DOCSLIB.ORG

Planetary Formation and Migration of Hot Jupiters: Possibility of Harboring Earth-Like Planets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planetary Formation and Migration of Hot Jupiters: Possibility of Harboring Earth-Like Planets Planetary Formation and Migration of Hot Jupiters: Possibility of Harboring Earth-Like Planets A. B. Bhattacharya1, S. Mondal2, and B. Raha1 1Department of Physics, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, India 2Department of Physics, Darjeeling Government College, Darjeeling, India International Journal of Research in Sciences Volume 2, Issue 2, July-December, 2014, pp. 16-27 DOA : 26112014, © IASTER 2014, www.iaster.com ABSTRACT Discovery of new exoplanet “hot Jupiters”, with anomalous inflated size, high temperature and low density relative to our solar planetary Jupiter has evoked the exoplanet as prime searching target. In this paper we have critically examined the formation of the family of hot Jupiters with their characteristics emphasizing the characteristics due to location of hot Jupiter as well as the transit timing variations. Possibilities of detectable radio flux with observational limits are focused with some interesting findings. We have further considered the structure and evolution of hot Jupiters besides their atmospheres and associated albedos. Keywords: Exoplanet, Hot Jupiters, Jupiter, Earth-like planet. 1. INTRODUCTION Hot Jupiter, a class of extra solar planets that are being discovered where the planet is really close to the parent star which is only a few stellar radii away and has an orbital period of three days or may be even one and a half days for some cases, while our solar system Jupiter with a fairly cold weather has a very long period of about 12 years orbits at ~5 AU from the Sun. Being close to parent star, temperature of hot Jupiter lies in between 1000 and 2000 K. They have the largest gravitational pull on their stars, so their name in the Doppler method of planet detection is the strongest. In 1995, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz [1] discovered the first planet and hot Jupiter around a Sun-like star using the radial-velocity technique. They used the spectrum of the star 51 Pegasi for detecting periodic Doppler shifts caused by the planet's gravitational pull on the star. This technique contributed towards finding hot Jupiters around less massive stars. Hot Jupiters have an orbital period of a few days and are much easier to detect than Earth-size planets very far from their stars [2]. In this paper we have first critically examined the formation of hot Jupiters and its characteristics. Possibilities of detectable radio flux from hot Jupiters with observational limits are then focused with some interesting findings. 2. FAMILY OF HOT JUPITERS Until a few decades ago, exoplanets and their solar systems were the matter of theory and assumptions. As our knowledge of the Universe moved from the area of guess work to hard data, we came to see our Sun as one of countless stars. In 1995, first hot Jupiter 51 Peg b was discovered from the spectrum of the star 51 Pegasi to detect periodic Doppler shifts caused by the planet's gravitational pull on the star [1]. 16 International Journal of Research in Sciences Volume 2, Issue 2, July-December, 2014, www.iaster.com Till now more than 415 hot Jupiters have been discovered [2]. Fig. 1 shows an artist's impression of a gas- giant exoplanet transiting across the face of its star. Figure 1 Artist's Impression of a Gas-Giant Exoplanet Transiting Across The Face of its Star [3] Most of the discovered exoplanets have been detected by radial velocity studies of the host star. The second-largest group has been detected through planetary transits. Twenty six planets have been detected by imaging and 12 have been discovered through planet-lens signatures detected during gravitational lensing events in which the host star serves as the primary lens. In 2006 the European Space Agency launched the COROT spacecraft, which was the first satellite used for searching extrasolar planets. The COROT spacecraft has discovered successfully many extrasolar planets. Subsequently, in 2009, NASA has launched Kepler spacecraft which also discovered more than 25 confirmed planets and around 1250 eligible candidates [4]. Both of these missions used the transit method when the planet passing in front of its star, blocking a very small proportion of the starlight [5]. Lensing method provides a potentially important complement to the radial-velocity and transit studies that have already been discovering hot Jupiters. It allows planet discovery even if the central star is too dim for detailed spectral studies and for all orbital inclinations, in contrast to transit studies. Furthermore, lensing provides a direct measure of the lens mass, at least in cases in which the mass of the central star can be determined. Lensing searches for hot Jupiters can be effective for nearby stars [6], allowing detailed follow-up studies. Companions of different hot Jupiters are shown in Table 1 with reference to their distances and associated semi major axis, orbital period as well as the corresponding temperature. Table 1 Hot Jupiters with Companions Semi Orbital Distance Temperature Planet major period M (M ) (pc) p J (K) axis (AU) Porb (days) Sources with eccentricities less than or equal to 0.1 HD 187123b 48.26 0.042 3.10 0.51 1320 HD 209458b 49.63 0.047 3.52 0.69 1316 55 Cnc b 12.34 0.116 14.65 0.84 661 55 Cnc b 12.34 0.240 44.3 0.84 661 HAT-P-13b 214 0.0426 2.91 0.85 1504 ρ CrB b 17.24 0.226 39.84 1.06 - 17 International Journal of Research in Sciences Volume 2, Issue 2, July-December, 2014, www.iaster.com u And e 13.47 5.25 3848 1.06 376 HD 189733b 19.45 0.031 2.22 1.13 1100 υ And b 13.49 0.059 4.62 1.4 1440 Qatar-2b 1.14 0.0215 1.33 2.49 1180 HD 195019b 38.52 0.137 18.20 3.58 - τ Boo b 15.62 0.048 3.31 6.5 6375 Sources with eccentricities greater than 0.1 HAT-P-17b 90.0 0.088 10.3 0.53 707 HIP 14810 d 52.9 1.9 962 0.57 175.6 HD 38529b 39.28 0.131 14.31 0.86 - HIP 14810 c 52.9 0.55 147.73 1.3 327 HAT-P-17c 90.0 2.75 1798 1.400 127.5 HD 217107b 19.72 0.073 7.12 1.85 960 HD 187123c 48.26 4.89 3810 1.990 122.7 HAT-P-31b 354 0.055 5.00 2.2 1325 HD 217107c 19.72 5.27 4210 2.5 111.1 HD 37605b 43.98 3.82 54.23 2.86 414 HD 37605c 43.98 0.261 2720 3.38 116.7 HIP 14810 b 52.9 0.069 6.67 3.9 918 HD 178911 Bb 42.59 0.345 71.48 7.29 470 70 Vir b 22.0 0.484 116.69 7.46 479 HD 114762b 39.5 0.363 83.89 11.68 487 HAT-P-13c 214 1.19 448.2 14.5 276 Recent analysis on Kepler-13Ab (= KOI-13.01) reveled that it is one of very few known short-period planets orbiting a hot A-type star, making it one of the hottest planets currently known. The availability of Kepler data allows measuring the planet’s occultation and phasing curve in the optical range as observed by warm Spitzer at 4.5 μm and 3.6 μm and a ground-based occultation observation in the Ks band (2.1 μm). Day-side hemisphere temperature is obtained as 2750 ± 160 K as the effective temperature of a black body thus showing the same occultation depths as reported [7]. The revised stellar parameters when combined with other measurements, leading to revised planetary mass and radius which can be estimated as, Mp = 4.94-8.09 M J and Rp = 1.406 ± 0.038 R J Kepler mid-occultation time was measured as (34.0 ± 6.9) s earlier than expected based on the mid-transit time and the delay due to light-travel time [7]. 2.1 Planet Jupiter of Sun vis-à-vis hot Jupiter and its Parent Stars Scientists have found that most known exoplanets have many similarities with the Jovian planets in our solar system, such as size, density, and composition. Exoplanets are probably made of hydrogen and helium gas. These planets are very close to the star, they experience a high surface temperature than on the Jovian planets [8]. Table 2 shows comparison between the planet Jupiter of the solar system and "hot Jupiters" as exoplanet. 18 International Journal of Research in Sciences Volume 2, Issue 2, July-December, 2014, www.iaster.com Table 2 Comparative studies between Jupiter and “Hot Jupiters” Dominant Jupiter “Hot Jupiters” Features Appearance Composition Composed primary of H and He Composed primary of H and He Distance and 5 AU from the Sun; orbital period: As closes as 0.03 AU to their stars; Orbit 10475.8 Jupiter solar days orbit as short as 1.2 Earth days Cloud top ~130 K Up to 1300 K temperatures Cloud Clouds of various H compounds Mainly consists of “rock dust” composition Radius 1 Jupiter radius Up to 1.3 Jupiter radii Mass 1 Jupiter mass 0.2 to 2 Jupiter masses Average density 1.33 g/cm3 As low as 0.3 g/cm3 Moons, rings, Present Unknown magnetosphere It appears from the table that the distance of planet Jupiter is much greater than the distance of hot Jupiter from their corresponding parent star while the cloud top temperature of Jupiter is only about one-tenth of that of the exoplanet hot Jupiter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INFORMATION CIRCULAR No. 185 (FEBRUARY 2015)
    INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION COMMISSION 26 (DOUBLE STARS) INFORMATION CIRCULAR No. 185 (FEBRUARY 2015) NEW ORBITS ADS Name P T e Ω(2000) 2015 Author(s) α2000δ n a i ! Last ob. 2016 32 STF 3056 AB 545y 2142.0 0.670 136◦4 141◦9 000709 ZIRM 00047+3416 0◦6606 000623 99◦4 119◦6 2009.8 141.9 0.708 147 BU 255 245. 2067.2 0.960 166.1 66.3 0.445 ZIRM 00118+2825 1.4694 0.661 116.0 265.4 2008.8 65.9 0.442 285 AC 1 525. 1820.1 0.600 107.5 288.7 1.839 ZIRM 00209+3259 0.6857 1.234 84.0 26.8 2012.1 288.8 1.841 363 A 431 AB 53.56 2003.58 0.644 25.5 329.5 0.172 SCARDIA 00271-0753 6.7214 0.364 109.0 293.0 2013.573 321.9 0.168 et al. (*) 1081 STF 113 A-BC 650. 1686.0 0.640 87.2 20.4 1.637 ZIRM 01198-0031 0.5538 1.324 43.5 106.7 2013.9 20.6 1.638 - MCA 7 3.800 2010.280 0.017 145.0 47.8 0.030 DOCOBO 02366+1227 94.737 0.077 112.7 3.7 2010.718 322.9 0.078 et al. (**) - FIN 333 83.73 1998.06 0.423 34.1 34.1 0.462 DOCOBO 02434-6643 4.300 0.509 90.0 269.2 2013.737 34.1 0.457 et al. (**) 2524 A 2909 11.345 2013.744 0.507 16.2 23.1 0.129 DOCOBO 03244-1539 31.732 0.172 71.3 283.0 2013.737 3 38.4 0.125 et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved Astrometric Binary Stars Brian D. Mason
    Resolved Astrometric Binary Stars Brian D. Mason 9/12/2012 U.S. Naval Observatory 1 Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Image: http://vega.lpl.arizona.edu/sirius/A5.html U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Due to stellar types (main- sequence and white dwarf) motion affect significant, but Image: http://vega.lpl.arizona.edu/sirius/A5.html companion hard to detect. • Sirius B first resolved in 1862 by Alvan Graham Clark (right) testing 18.5 ” Clark refractor. U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Due to stellar types (main- sequence and white dwarf) motion affect significant, but companion hard to detect. • Sirius B first resolved in 1862 by Alvan Graham Clark (right) testing 18.5 ” Clark refractor. • Procyon B first resolved in 1896 by John Martin Schaeberle with Lick 36 ” Clark refractor. U.S. Naval Observatory CurrentCurrent Orbit: Orbit: Procyon Sirius AB AB • Broken line is line of nodes. • Green plus signs and asterisks: micrometry. • Pink asterisks: photography • Blue circles: HST/WFPC2 • Scales on axis are in arcseconds. • Direction of orbital motion at lower right. • Sirius Period = 50.090y. • Procyon Period = 40.82y. U.S. Naval Observatory Orbits • The 6 th Catalog of Orbits of Visual Binary Stars has 2298 orbits of 2187 systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets
    Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets1 R. P. Butler2, J. T. Wright3, G. W. Marcy3,4, D. A Fischer3,4, S. S. Vogt5, C. G. Tinney6, H. R. A. Jones7, B. D. Carter8, J. A. Johnson3, C. McCarthy2,4, A. J. Penny9,10 ABSTRACT We present a catalog of nearby exoplanets. It contains the 172 known low- mass companions with orbits established through radial velocity and transit mea- surements around stars within 200 pc. We include 5 previously unpublished exo- planets orbiting the stars HD 11964, HD 66428, HD 99109, HD 107148, and HD 164922. We update orbits for 90 additional exoplanets including many whose orbits have not been revised since their announcement, and include radial ve- locity time series from the Lick, Keck, and Anglo-Australian Observatory planet searches. Both these new and previously published velocities are more precise here due to improvements in our data reduction pipeline, which we applied to archival spectra. We present a brief summary of the global properties of the known exoplanets, including their distributions of orbital semimajor axis, mini- mum mass, and orbital eccentricity. Subject headings: catalogs — stars: exoplanets — techniques: radial velocities 1Based on observations obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated jointly by the Uni- versity of California and the California Institute of Technology. The Keck Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. arXiv:astro-ph/0607493v1 21 Jul 2006 2Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institute of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015-1305 3Department of Astronomy, 601 Campbell Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132 5UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 6Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Time: Planet Finding
    Last Time: Planet Finding • Radial velocity method • Parent star’s Doppler shi • Planet minimum mass, orbital period, semi- major axis, orbital eccentricity • UnAl Kepler Mission, was the method with the most planets Last Time: Planet Finding • Transits – eclipse of the parent star: • Planetary radius, orbital period, semi-major axis • Now the most common way to find planets Last Time: Planet Finding • Direct Imaging • Planetary brightness, distance from parent star at that moment • About 10 planets detected Last Time: Planet Finding • Lensing • Planetary mass and, distance from parent star at that moment • You want to look towards the center of the galaxy where there is a high density of stars Last Time: Planet Finding • Astrometry • Tiny changes in star’s posiAon are not yet measurable • Would give you planet’s mass, orbit, and eccentricity One more important thing to add: • Giant planets (which are easiest to detect) are preferenAally found around stars that are abundant in iron – “metallicity” • Iron is the easiest heavy element to measure in a star • Heavy-element rich planetary systems make planets more easily 13.2 The Nature of Extrasolar Planets Our goals for learning: • What have we learned about extrasolar planets? • How do extrasolar planets compare with planets in our solar system? Measurable Properties • Orbital period, distance, and orbital shape • Planet mass, size, and density • Planetary temperature • Composition Orbits of Extrasolar Planets • Nearly all of the detected planets have orbits smaller than Jupiter’s. • This is a selection effect: Planets at greater distances are harder to detect with the Doppler technique. Orbits of Extrasolar Planets • Orbits of some extrasolar planets are much more elongated (have a greater eccentricity) than those in our solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival of Satellites During the Migration of a Hot Jupiter: the Influence of Tides
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-1590-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Survival of satellites during the migration of a Hot Jupiter: the influence of tides Emeline Bolmont (1), Apurva V. Oza (2), Sergi Blanco-Cuaresma (3), Christoph Mordasini (2), Pierre Auclair-Desrotour (2), Adrien Leleu (2) (1) Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland ([email protected]) (2) Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bern, Gesellschaftsstr. 6, 3012, Bern, Switzerland (3) Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract 2. The model We explore the origin and stability of extrasolar satel- lites orbiting close-in gas giants, by investigating if the Tidal interactions 1 M⊙ satellite can survive the migration of the planet in the 1 MIo protoplanetary disk. To accomplish this objective, we 1 MJup used Posidonius, a N-Body code with an integrated tidal model, which we expanded to account for the migration of the gas giant in a disk. Preliminary re- Inner edge of disk: ain sults suggest the survival of the satellite is rare, which Type 2 migration: !mig would indicate that if such satellites do exist, capture is a more likely process. Figure 1: Schema of the simulation set up: A Io-like satellite orbits around a Jupiter-like planet with a solar- 1. Introduction like host star. Satellites around Hot Jupiters were first thought to be lost by falling onto their planet over Gyr timescales (e.g. [1]). This is due to the low tidal dissipation factor of Jupiter (Q 106, [10]), likely to be caused by the 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Exoplanet Populations with NASA's Kepler Mission
    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE SPECIAL FEATURE: Exploring exoplanet populations with NASA’s Kepler Mission Natalie M. Batalha1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, 94035 CA Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board June 3, 2014 (received for review January 15, 2014) The Kepler Mission is exploring the diversity of planets and planetary systems. Its legacy will be a catalog of discoveries sufficient for computing planet occurrence rates as a function of size, orbital period, star type, and insolation flux.The mission has made significant progress toward achieving that goal. Over 3,500 transiting exoplanets have been identified from the analysis of the first 3 y of data, 100 planets of which are in the habitable zone. The catalog has a high reliability rate (85–90% averaged over the period/radius plane), which is improving as follow-up observations continue. Dynamical (e.g., velocimetry and transit timing) and statistical methods have confirmed and characterized hundreds of planets over a large range of sizes and compositions for both single- and multiple-star systems. Population studies suggest that planets abound in our galaxy and that small planets are particularly frequent. Here, I report on the progress Kepler has made measuring the prevalence of exoplanets orbiting within one astronomical unit of their host stars in support of the National Aeronautics and Space Admin- istration’s long-term goal of finding habitable environments beyond the solar system. planet detection | transit photometry Searching for evidence of life beyond Earth is the Sun would produce an 84-ppm signal Translating Kepler’s discovery catalog into one of the primary goals of science agencies lasting ∼13 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Exomoons and the Characterization of Exoplanet Atmospheres
    Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Astronomia e Astrofisica The search for exomoons and the characterization of exoplanet atmospheres Relatore interno : dott. Alessandro Melchiorri Relatore esterno : dott.ssa Giovanna Tinetti Candidato: Giammarco Campanella Anno Accademico 2008/2009 The search for exomoons and the characterization of exoplanet atmospheres Giammarco Campanella Dipartimento di Fisica Università degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza” Associate at Department of Physics & Astronomy University College London A thesis submitted for the MSc Degree in Astronomy and Astrophysics September 4th, 2009 Università degli Studi di Roma ―La Sapienza‖ Abstract THE SEARCH FOR EXOMOONS AND THE CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOPLANET ATMOSPHERES by Giammarco Campanella Since planets were first discovered outside our own Solar System in 1992 (around a pulsar) and in 1995 (around a main sequence star), extrasolar planet studies have become one of the most dynamic research fields in astronomy. Our knowledge of extrasolar planets has grown exponentially, from our understanding of their formation and evolution to the development of different methods to detect them. Now that more than 370 exoplanets have been discovered, focus has moved from finding planets to characterise these alien worlds. As well as detecting the atmospheres of these exoplanets, part of the characterisation process undoubtedly involves the search for extrasolar moons. The structure of the thesis is as follows. In Chapter 1 an historical background is provided and some general aspects about ongoing situation in the research field of extrasolar planets are shown. In Chapter 2, various detection techniques such as radial velocity, microlensing, astrometry, circumstellar disks, pulsar timing and magnetospheric emission are described. A special emphasis is given to the transit photometry technique and to the two already operational transit space missions, CoRoT and Kepler.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Brown Dwarfs Survive on Close Orbits Around Convective Stars? C
    A&A 589, A55 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527100 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics Can brown dwarfs survive on close orbits around convective stars? C. Damiani1 and R. F. Díaz2 1 Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, UMR8617, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Observatoire astronomique de l’Université de Genève, 51 ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] Received 1 August 2015 / Accepted 23 February 2016 ABSTRACT Context. The mass range of brown dwarfs extends across the planetary domain to stellar objects. There is a relative paucity of brown dwarfs companions around FGKM-type stars compared to exoplanets for orbital periods of less than a few years, but most of the short-period brown dwarf companions that are fully characterised by transits and radial velocities are found around F-type stars. Aims. We examine the hypothesis that brown dwarf companions could not survive on close orbit around stars with important convec- tive envelopes because the tides and angular momentum loss, the result of magnetic braking, would lead to a rapid orbital decay with the companion being quickly engulfed. Methods. We use a classical Skumanich-type braking law and constant time-lag tidal theory to assess the characteristic timescale for orbital decay for the brown dwarf mass range as a function of the host properties. Results. We find that F-type stars may host massive companions for a significantly longer time than G-type stars for a given orbital period, which may explain the paucity of G-type hosts for brown dwarfs with an orbital period less than five days.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Based Secondary Eclipse Detection of the Very-Hot Jupiter OGLE-TR-56B
    A&A 493, L31–L34 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811268 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Letter to the Editor Ground-based secondary eclipse detection of the very-hot Jupiter OGLE-TR-56b D. K. Sing1 and M. López-Morales2, 1 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS/UPMC, 98bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Carnegie Institution of Washington, Dept. of Terrestrial Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 31 October 2008 / Accepted 21 November 2008 ABSTRACT We report on the detection of the secondary eclipse of the very-hot Jupiter OGLE-TR-56b from combined z-band time series pho- tometry obtained with the VLT and Magellan telescopes. We measure a flux decrement of 0.0363 ± 0.0091% from the combined +127 Magellan and VLT datasets, which indicates a blackbody brightness temperature of 2718−107 K, a very low albedo, and a small in- cident radiation redistribution factor, indicating a lack of strong winds in the planet’s atmosphere. The measured secondary depth is consistent with thermal emission, but our precision is not sufficient to distinguish between a black-body emitting planet, or emission as predicted by models with strong optical absorbers such as TiO/VO. This is the first time that thermal emission from an extrasolar planet is detected at optical wavelengths and with ground-based telescopes. Key words. binaries: eclipsing – planetary systems – stars: individual: OGLE-TR-56 – techniques: photometric 1. Introduction Here we present the results of the follow-up observations to test that prediction.
    [Show full text]