DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Exoplanet Populations with NASA's Kepler Mission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Exoplanet Populations with NASA's Kepler Mission SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE SPECIAL FEATURE: Exploring exoplanet populations with NASA’s Kepler Mission Natalie M. Batalha1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, 94035 CA Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board June 3, 2014 (received for review January 15, 2014) The Kepler Mission is exploring the diversity of planets and planetary systems. Its legacy will be a catalog of discoveries sufficient for computing planet occurrence rates as a function of size, orbital period, star type, and insolation flux.The mission has made significant progress toward achieving that goal. Over 3,500 transiting exoplanets have been identified from the analysis of the first 3 y of data, 100 planets of which are in the habitable zone. The catalog has a high reliability rate (85–90% averaged over the period/radius plane), which is improving as follow-up observations continue. Dynamical (e.g., velocimetry and transit timing) and statistical methods have confirmed and characterized hundreds of planets over a large range of sizes and compositions for both single- and multiple-star systems. Population studies suggest that planets abound in our galaxy and that small planets are particularly frequent. Here, I report on the progress Kepler has made measuring the prevalence of exoplanets orbiting within one astronomical unit of their host stars in support of the National Aeronautics and Space Admin- istration’s long-term goal of finding habitable environments beyond the solar system. planet detection | transit photometry Searching for evidence of life beyond Earth is the Sun would produce an 84-ppm signal Translating Kepler’s discovery catalog into one of the primary goals of science agencies lasting ∼13 h. population statistics requires corrections for in the United States and abroad. The goal Kepler’s pixel and flux measurements (2) observation and detection biases. This is a looms closer as a result of exoplanet discov- are publicly available at the Mikulski Archive work in progress. However, occurrence rate eries made by the National Aeronautics and for Space Telescopes (MAST) (http://archive. calculations based on subsets of the data al- Space Administration’s(NASA)10thDiscov- stsci.edu/kepler). Transit searches have been ready indicate that nature produces small ery Mission, Kepler. Launched in March performed on successively larger data volumes planets relatively efficiently in the warmer 2009, the Kepler spacecraft is exploring the yielding incremental planet candidate cat- environs of a planetary system. Giant planets diversity of planets and planetary systems alogs that are hosted at NASA’sExoplanet in such orbits are orders of magnitude less within one astronomical unit (AU). The pri- Archive (NEA) (http://exoplanetarchive.ipac. frequent than their sub-Neptunian counter- mary mission objective is to determine the parts. Ironically, the hot Jupiters that com- caltech.edu). To date, approximately three- prevalence of potentially habitable, Earth-size prised the very first Doppler and transiting quarters of the data have been thoroughly planets in the galaxy. Discovering exoterrans exoplanet discoveries are actually quite rare. in the habitable zone (HZ), characterizing searched. As of this writing (April 2014), the Current results for habitable-zone planets tell those that have habitable environments, and archive is host to over 3,500 viable planet us that we may not have to look very far be- then focusing on the signatures of biological candidates (with radii smaller than twice fore happening upon a planet similar to Earth. chemistry is a path of exploration that Jupiter). All have been subjected to a series A comprehensive review of Kepler exo- stretches decades into the future. It begins of statistical tests (based on the Kepler data planet science is beyond the scope of this by determining if planets like Earth are itself) that ensure a low rate of instrumental contribution. Here, I focus on the science abundant. and astrophysical false positives (3). leading to the determination of planet oc- Kepler has a follow-up observation pro- currence rates, from the discovery catalogs ’ NASA s 10th Discovery Mission gram to increase the reliability of the catalog to the first calculations of the prevalence of From 2009 to 2013, Kepler monitored a 115- even further by (i) improving the accuracy Earth-like planets. square-degree field in the constellations of the host star properties which in turn Kepler Transforms the Discovery Space Cygnus and Lyra, collecting ultrahigh pre- improves the accuracy of the planet proper- Exoplanet discoveries trickled in at a steady cision photometry of over 190,000 stars si- ties (or changes the interpretation altogether) multaneously at a 30-min cadence. Nearly rate in the latter half of the 1990s. Approxi- and (ii) identifying bound stellar companions uninterrupted photometry is possible due mately 30 were reported with sizes ranging and line-of-sight neighbors that might in- to a heliocentric orbit and off-ecliptic point- from 0.4 to 8 Jupiter masses and orbital ing. The observations yield an evenly sam- dicate an astrophysical false positive. Ground- periods ranging from 3 to 3,800 d. Heralding pled, minimally gapped flux time series that and space-based telescopes with apertures in the new millennium, the first transiting can be searched for periodic diminutions of ranging from 1.5 to 10 m are being used to acquire high-resolution spectroscopy and light due to the transit of an exoplanet Author contributions: N.M.B. designed research, performed re- across the stellar disk in an aligned ge- high-contrast/high-spatial resolution images. search, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. ometry. The photometer was engineered to Strategic high-precision Doppler measure- The author declares no conflict of interest. achieve 20-ppm relative precision in 6.5 h ments are providing planet masses in an This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. A.S.B. is a guest editor for a 12th magnitude G-type main-sequence effort to delineate the transition between invited by the Editorial Board. star (1). For reference, the Earth orbiting terrestrial and giant planets. 1Email: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1304196111 PNAS | September 2, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 35 | 12647–12654 Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 exoplanet was discovered (4, 5). The timing detections), they are estimated using a poly- 2,658 stars based on 1.5, 13, 16, 22, and 34.5 was a boon for Kepler as it was proposing to nomial fit to solar system planets (R = M0.4854) of the ∼48 mo of data acquired during the use this detection technique from space. In (6). Shown here are 3,553 Kepler discoveries primary mission (7–11). Kepler data in the 2000, Kepler was one of the three Discovery associated with 2,658 stars. Approximately prime mission were downlinked monthly but Mission proposals invited to submit a Con- 22% of the Kepler host stars are known to processed on a quarterly basis. Transit searches cept Study Report. It was selected for flight harbor multiple planet candidates. The over- and the associated planet candidate catalogs on December 20, 2001. all reliability of the catalog (80–90%) is are, therefore, referred to by the quarters As Kepler was being designed and built, discussed below. bracketing the data. The most recent planet exoplanet discoveries were growing at an The demographics of the observed pop- candidates were identified in a search of 12 accelerated pace. By the eve of Kepler’s ulation has changed remarkably. Kepler has quarters of data (Q1–Q12) where the first is launch, over 300 discoveries had been re- increased the roster of exoplanets by nearly only slightly longer than one month in du- ported including nearly 70 transiting systems. 400%. More remarkable still is the change in ration (hence the 34.5-mo time span). All non-Kepler discoveries up through April the distribution: 86% of the non-Kepler dis- Previously detected candidates are reex- 2014 are shown in Fig. 1, Left, in a plot of coveries have masses larger than Neptune amined as larger data volumes become avail- mass (or minimum mass for nontransiting whereas 85% of the Kepler discoveries have able. However, this does not occur with every planets) versus orbital period with symbols radii smaller than Neptune. Kepler is filling catalog release. Some of the candidates in the color-coded by the discovery method. (Meth- in an area of parameters space that was not cumulative archive at the NEA were discov- odologies with small numbers of discoveries previously accessible. The increase in sensi- ered with less than 34.5 mo of data and have have been left out for clarity). Collectively, tivity afforded us by Kepler has opened the not yet been reexamined. This nonuniformity there are 697 (non-Kepler)exoplanets(with floodgates to the small planets so difficult to will be resolved as Kepler completes its final a measured orbital period and radius or mass) detect from ground-based surveys. The most search and vetting of the entire 17 quarters associated with 583 unique stars. Approxi- common type of planet known to us is a (48 mo) of data acquired during its primary ’ mately 16% of these host stars are known to population that does not exist in ourown solar mission lifetime. Kepler splanetcandidate harbor multiple planets. system: the super-Earths and mini-Neptunes catalog is also known as the Kepler Object of Fig. 1, Right,showsthesamepopulation between1and4Earthradii. Interest (KOI) Catalog. However, KOIs also together with the Kepler planet candidate include events that are classified as false discoveries in the cumulative table at NEA Status of Kepler’s Discovery Catalogs alarms or astrophysical false positives. Only as of April 2014. Detections are plotted as Catalogs of Kepler’s viable planet candidates those flagged as planet candidates in the planet radius versus orbital period, and the have been released periodically since launch NEA cumulative catalog are shown in Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Discovery of Exoplanets
    L'Univers, S´eminairePoincar´eXX (2015) 113 { 137 S´eminairePoincar´e New Worlds Ahead: The Discovery of Exoplanets Arnaud Cassan Universit´ePierre et Marie Curie Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris 98bis boulevard Arago 75014 Paris, France Abstract. Exoplanets are planets orbiting stars other than the Sun. In 1995, the discovery of the first exoplanet orbiting a solar-type star paved the way to an exoplanet detection rush, which revealed an astonishing diversity of possible worlds. These detections led us to completely renew planet formation and evolu- tion theories. Several detection techniques have revealed a wealth of surprising properties characterizing exoplanets that are not found in our own planetary system. After two decades of exoplanet search, these new worlds are found to be ubiquitous throughout the Milky Way. A positive sign that life has developed elsewhere than on Earth? 1 The Solar system paradigm: the end of certainties Looking at the Solar system, striking facts appear clearly: all seven planets orbit in the same plane (the ecliptic), all have almost circular orbits, the Sun rotation is perpendicular to this plane, and the direction of the Sun rotation is the same as the planets revolution around the Sun. These observations gave birth to the Solar nebula theory, which was proposed by Kant and Laplace more that two hundred years ago, but, although correct, it has been for decades the subject of many debates. In this theory, the Solar system was formed by the collapse of an approximately spheric giant interstellar cloud of gas and dust, which eventually flattened in the plane perpendicular to its initial rotation axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Super-Earth Atmospheres in Preparation for Upcoming Extremely Large Telescopes
    Modeling Super-Earth Atmospheres In Preparation for Upcoming Extremely Large Telescopes Maggie Thompson1 Jonathan Fortney1, Andy Skemer1, Tyler Robinson2, Theodora Karalidi1, Steph Sallum1 1University of California, Santa Cruz, CA; 2Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ ExoPAG 19 January 6, 2019 Seattle, Washington Image Credit: NASA Ames/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle Roadmap Research Goals & Current Atmosphere Modeling Selecting Super-Earths for State of Super-Earth Tool (Past & Present) Follow-Up Observations Detection Preliminary Assessment of Future Observatories for Conclusions & Upcoming Instruments’ Super-Earths Future Work Capabilities for Super-Earths M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Research Goals • Extend previous modeling tool to simulate super-Earth planet atmospheres around M, K and G stars • Apply modified code to explore the parameter space of actual and synthetic super-Earths to select most suitable set of confirmed exoplanets for follow-up observations with JWST and next-generation ground-based telescopes • Inform the design of advanced instruments such as the Planetary Systems Imager (PSI), a proposed second-generation instrument for TMT/GMT M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Current State of Super-Earth Detections (1) Neptune Mass Range of Interest Earth Data from NASA Exoplanet Archive M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Current State of Super-Earth Detections (2) A Approximate Habitable Zone Host Star Spectral Type F G K M Data from NASA Exoplanet Archive M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Atmosphere Modeling Tool Evolution of Atmosphere Model • Solar System Planets & Moons ~ 1980’s (e.g., McKay et al. 1989) • Brown Dwarfs ~ 2000’s (e.g., Burrows et al. 2001) • Hot Jupiters & Other Giant Exoplanets ~ 2000’s (e.g., Fortney et al.
    [Show full text]
  • PEAS: the PLANET AS EXOPLANET ANALOG SPECTROGRAPH. E. C. Martin1 and A
    Exoplanets in our Backyard 2020 (LPI Contrib. No. 2195) 3006.pdf PEAS: THE PLANET AS EXOPLANET ANALOG SPECTROGRAPH. E. C. Martin1 and A. J. Skemer1, 1Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA ([email protected]) Introduction: Exoplanets are abundant in our Galaxy • Produce 2D surface maps of Venus, Mars, Jupi- and yet characterizing them remains a technical chal- ter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune lenGe. Solar System planets provide an opportunity to • Produce fiducial measurements that will be used test the practical limitations of exoplanet observations to plan instruments for future exoplanet mis- with hiGh siGnal-to-noise data, and ancillary data (such sions, such as HabEx/LUVOIR and TMT. as 2D maps and in situ measurements) that we cannot Long term: access for exoplanets. However, data on Solar System • Time-series observations of Solar System plan- planets differ from exoplanets in that Solar System ets to explore variability and weather patterns planets are spatially resolved while exoplanets are all on planets unresolved point-sources. • Comparison to historical data (e.g. [4]) There have been several recent efforts to validate techniques for interpreting exoplanet observations by • Study planetary seismoloGy (oscillation modes) binning images of Solar System planets to a single of Solar System planets pixel: For example, Cowan et al. [1] used images from the EPOXI mission to study Earth’s Globally averaGed PEAS Instrument Design Planetary light collect- properties as it rotated; MayorGa et al. [2] used data ed by the telescope will be split into a spectroGraph from the Cassini spacecraft’s fly-by of Jupiter to ob- system and an imaGinG system for simultaneous obser- serve Globally averaGed reflected liGht phase curves; vations.
    [Show full text]
  • First Results from Planet Hunters: Exploring the Inventory of Short Period Planets from Kepler
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 6, EPSC-DPS2011-1226, 2011 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 c Author(s) 2011 First Results from Planet Hunters: Exploring the Inventory of Short Period Planets from Kepler C. J. Lintott (1,2), M. E. Schwamb(3,4), D. A. Fischer(5), M. J. Giguere(5), S. Lynn(1), J. M. Brewer(5), K. Schawinski(3,4), R. J. Simpson(1), A. Smith(1), J. Spronck(5) (1) Department of Physics, University of Oxford, (2) Adler Planetarium, Chicago, (3) Department of Physics, Yale University, (4) Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Yale University, (5) Department of Astronomy, Yale Abstract suited to picking out outliers and can find most transits that cannot be detected in periodograms and We present the first results and planet candidates identify transit signals that may be missed by the from Planet Hunters, part of the Zooniverse sophisticated TPS. It is unrealistic to expect a single collection of citizen science projects. [3,4]. Planet individual or a small group of experts to review the Hunters enlists more than 40,000 members of the entire Kepler dataset, but with over 40,000 volunteers general public to visually identify transits in the examining the light curves on the Planet Hunters publicly released Kepler data via the World Wide interface, we have the ability to visually inspect the Web in order to provide a completely independent entire public dataset for signatures of exoplanet assessment of planet frequencies derived from the transits. Kepler light curves. We examine the abundance of large planets (> 2 earth radii) on short period (< 15 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Time: Planet Finding
    Last Time: Planet Finding • Radial velocity method • Parent star’s Doppler shi • Planet minimum mass, orbital period, semi- major axis, orbital eccentricity • UnAl Kepler Mission, was the method with the most planets Last Time: Planet Finding • Transits – eclipse of the parent star: • Planetary radius, orbital period, semi-major axis • Now the most common way to find planets Last Time: Planet Finding • Direct Imaging • Planetary brightness, distance from parent star at that moment • About 10 planets detected Last Time: Planet Finding • Lensing • Planetary mass and, distance from parent star at that moment • You want to look towards the center of the galaxy where there is a high density of stars Last Time: Planet Finding • Astrometry • Tiny changes in star’s posiAon are not yet measurable • Would give you planet’s mass, orbit, and eccentricity One more important thing to add: • Giant planets (which are easiest to detect) are preferenAally found around stars that are abundant in iron – “metallicity” • Iron is the easiest heavy element to measure in a star • Heavy-element rich planetary systems make planets more easily 13.2 The Nature of Extrasolar Planets Our goals for learning: • What have we learned about extrasolar planets? • How do extrasolar planets compare with planets in our solar system? Measurable Properties • Orbital period, distance, and orbital shape • Planet mass, size, and density • Planetary temperature • Composition Orbits of Extrasolar Planets • Nearly all of the detected planets have orbits smaller than Jupiter’s. • This is a selection effect: Planets at greater distances are harder to detect with the Doppler technique. Orbits of Extrasolar Planets • Orbits of some extrasolar planets are much more elongated (have a greater eccentricity) than those in our solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exoplanet Revolution
    FEATURES THE EXOPLANET REVOLUTION l Yamila Miguel – Leiden Observatory, Leiden, The Netherlands – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2019506 Hot Jupiters, super-Earths, lava-worlds and the search for life beyond our solar system: the exoplanet revolution started almost 30 years ago and is now taking off. re there other planets like the Earth out discovered the astonishing number of 4000 exoplanets, there? This is probably one of the oldest and counting. Every new discovery shows an amazing questions of humanity. For centuries and diversity that impacts in the perception and understand- Auntil the 90s, we only knew of the existence ing of our own solar system. of 8 planets. But today we live in a privileged time. For the first time in history we know that there are other How to find exoplanets? planets orbiting distant stars. Finding exoplanets is an extremely difficult task. These The first planet orbiting a star similar to the Sun was planets shine mostly due to the reflection of the stellar . Artist’s impression discovered in 1995 -only 24 years ago- and it started light in their atmospheres and their light is incredibly of COROT-7b. a revolution in Astronomy. Today astronomers have weak compared to that of their host stars. For this reason, © ESO/L. Calçada EPN 50/5&6 41 FEATURES THE Exoplanet REVolution observing exoplanets directly is extremely difficult and allows astronomers to calculate the planet’s density, astronomers had to develop indirect techniques that infer important to start assessing planetary compositions the presence of the planet. and diversity. Two of the most successful techniques to discov- er exoplanets are the "Transits" and "Radial Veloci- The Exoplanet Zoo ties" techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Refereed Publications That Name
    59 Refereed Publications Since 2011 with Named Co-Authors who are NASA Citizen Scientists Compiled by Marc Kuchner February 2021 Authors in bold are citizen scientists. Aurorasaurus Semeter, J., Hunnekuhl, M., MacDonald, E., Hirsch, M., Zeller, N., Chernenkoff, A., & Wang, J. (2020). The mysterious green streaks below STEVE. AGU Advances, 1, e2020AV000183. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000183 Hunnekuhl, M., & MacDonald, E. (2020). Early ground‐based work by auroral pioneer Carl Størmer on the high‐altitude detached subauroral arcs now known as “STEVE”. Space Weather, 18, e2019SW002384. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002384 S. B. Mende. B. J. Harding, & C. Turner. “Subauroral Green STEVE Arcs: Evidence for Low- Energy Excitation” Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 46, Issue 24, Pages 14256-14262 (2019) http://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086145 S. B. Mende. & C. Turner. “Color Ratios of Subauroral (STEVE) Arcs” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics),Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 5945-5955 (2019) http://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026851 Y. Nishimura, Y., B, Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Y, Zou, E. Mishin, D.J. Knudsen, E. F. Donovan, V. Angelopoulos, R. Raybell, “Magnetospheric Signatures of STEVE: Implications for the Magnetospheric Energy Source and Interhemispheric Conjugacy” Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 46, Issue 11, Pages 5637-5644 (2019) Elizabeth A. MacDonald, Eric Donovan, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Nathan A. Case, D. Megan Gillies, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, William E. Archer, Emma L. Spanswick, Notanee Bourassa, Martin Connors, Matthew Heavner, Brian Jackel, Burcu Kosar, David J. Knudsen, Chris Ratzlaff and Ian Schofield, “New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere” Science Advances, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumbinary Habitable Zones in the Presence of a Giant Planet
    Circumbinary habitable zones in the presence of a giant planet Nikolaos Georgakarakos 1;2;∗, Siegfried Eggl 4;5;6;7 and Ian Dobbs-Dixon 1;2;3 1 Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE 2Center for Astro, Particle and Planetary Physics (CAP3), New York University Abu Dhabi,UAE 3Center for Space Sciences, New York University Abu Dhabi,UAE 4Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 5Vera C. Rubin Observatory, Tucson, Arizona, USA 6Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Chicago at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA 7IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, Paris, France Correspondence*: Nikolaos Georgakarakos [email protected] ABSTRACT Determining habitable zones in binary star systems can be a challenging task due to the combination of perturbed planetary orbits and varying stellar irradiation conditions. The concept of “dynamically informed habitable zones” allows us, nevertheless, to make predictions on where to look for habitable worlds in such complex environments. Dynamically informed habitable zones have been used in the past to investigate the habitability of circumstellar planets in binary systems and Earth-like analogs in systems with giant planets. Here, we extend the concept to potentially habitable worlds on circumbinary orbits. We show that habitable zone borders can be found analytically even when another giant planet is present in the system. By applying this methodology to Kepler-16, Kepler-34, Kepler-35, Kepler-38, Kepler-64, Kepler-413, Kepler-453, Kepler-1647 and Kepler-1661 we demonstrate that the presence of the known giant planets in the majority of those systems does not preclude the existence of potentially habitable worlds.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival of Satellites During the Migration of a Hot Jupiter: the Influence of Tides
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-1590-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Survival of satellites during the migration of a Hot Jupiter: the influence of tides Emeline Bolmont (1), Apurva V. Oza (2), Sergi Blanco-Cuaresma (3), Christoph Mordasini (2), Pierre Auclair-Desrotour (2), Adrien Leleu (2) (1) Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland ([email protected]) (2) Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bern, Gesellschaftsstr. 6, 3012, Bern, Switzerland (3) Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract 2. The model We explore the origin and stability of extrasolar satel- lites orbiting close-in gas giants, by investigating if the Tidal interactions 1 M⊙ satellite can survive the migration of the planet in the 1 MIo protoplanetary disk. To accomplish this objective, we 1 MJup used Posidonius, a N-Body code with an integrated tidal model, which we expanded to account for the migration of the gas giant in a disk. Preliminary re- Inner edge of disk: ain sults suggest the survival of the satellite is rare, which Type 2 migration: !mig would indicate that if such satellites do exist, capture is a more likely process. Figure 1: Schema of the simulation set up: A Io-like satellite orbits around a Jupiter-like planet with a solar- 1. Introduction like host star. Satellites around Hot Jupiters were first thought to be lost by falling onto their planet over Gyr timescales (e.g. [1]). This is due to the low tidal dissipation factor of Jupiter (Q 106, [10]), likely to be caused by the 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Hunters, Zooniverse Evaluation Report
    Planet Hunters | Evaluation Report 2019 Planet Hunters, Zooniverse Evaluation report Authored by Dr Annaleise Depper Evaluation Officer, Public Engagement with Research Research Services, University of Oxford 1 Planet Hunters | Evaluation Report 2019 Contents 1. Key findings and highlights ..................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 3. Evaluating Planet Hunters ....................................................................................... 5 4. Exploring impacts and outcomes on citizen scientists ............................................. 6 4.1 Increased knowledge and understanding of Astronomy ..................................................................... 7 4.2 An enjoyable and interesting experience ......................................................................................... 12 4.3 Raised aspirations and interests in Astronomy ................................................................................ 13 4.4 Feeling of pride and satisfaction in helping the scientific community ............................................... 17 4.5 Benefits to individual wellbeing ...................................................................................................... 19 5. Learning from the evaluation ................................................................................ 20 5.1 Motivations for taking part in Planet Hunters
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Hunters. VI: an Independent Characterization of KOI-351 and Several Long Period Planet Candidates from the Kepler Archival Data
    Accepted to AJ Planet Hunters VI: An Independent Characterization of KOI-351 and Several Long Period Planet Candidates from the Kepler Archival Data1 Joseph R. Schmitt2, Ji Wang2, Debra A. Fischer2, Kian J. Jek7, John C. Moriarty2, Tabetha S. Boyajian2, Megan E. Schwamb3, Chris Lintott4;5, Stuart Lynn5, Arfon M. Smith5, Michael Parrish5, Kevin Schawinski6, Robert Simpson4, Daryll LaCourse7, Mark R. Omohundro7, Troy Winarski7, Samuel Jon Goodman7, Tony Jebson7, Hans Martin Schwengeler7, David A. Paterson7, Johann Sejpka7, Ivan Terentev7, Tom Jacobs7, Nawar Alsaadi7, Robert C. Bailey7, Tony Ginman7, Pete Granado7, Kristoffer Vonstad Guttormsen7, Franco Mallia7, Alfred L. Papillon7, Franco Rossi7, and Miguel Socolovsky7 [email protected] ABSTRACT We report the discovery of 14 new transiting planet candidates in the Kepler field from the Planet Hunters citizen science program. None of these candidates overlapped with Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) at the time of submission. We report the discovery of one more addition to the six planet candidate system around KOI-351, making it the only seven planet candidate system from Kepler. Additionally, KOI-351 bears some resemblance to our own solar system, with the inner five planets ranging from Earth to mini-Neptune radii and the outer planets being gas giants; however, this system is very compact, with all seven planet candidates orbiting . 1 AU from their host star. A Hill stability test and an orbital integration of the system shows that the system is stable. Furthermore, we significantly add to the population of long period 1This publication has been made possible through the work of more than 280,000 volunteers in the Planet Hunters project, whose contributions are individually acknowledged at http://www.planethunters.org/authors.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2019, the Role of Citizen Scientists in New Discoveries
    Astrobiology News January 2019: The Role of Citizen Scientists in New Discoveries Zooniverse is the world’s largest and most popular platform for online citizen science.1 Last month, I mentioned the launch of Planet Hunters TESS; this month, I want to tell you about two exciting new discoveries by citizen scientists participating in Exoplanet Explorers, which uses data from the Kepler Observatory’s Second Mission.2 Both discoveries are described extensively in Zooniverse blogs posted on January 7th.3 Exoplanet K2-288b orbits in the habitable zone of the smaller of two low- mass red dwarf stars that form a binary system. Its size places it in a rare category of planets being dubbed “sub-Neptunes” – worlds thought to lie in a transition region between potentially habitable “super-Earths” and worlds more like the gas giants in our Solar System. K2-138g, just a bit smaller than Neptune, is the 6th planet discovered in the K2-138 system, which harbors a somewhat more massive “orange dwarf” star. The K2- 138 system shares some similarities with the TRAPPIST-1 system, which you can read more about in the Astrobiology News posts from March and May 2017.4 What makes the K2-138 and TRAPPIST-1 systems similar is that the planets all orbit close to their stars, with very short periods. Five of the 6 planets in K2-138, and all 7 planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, form a so- called resonant chain, where the planet orbits are related by the ratios of small integers. The orbiting bodies in such systems exert periodic gravitational influence on each other.
    [Show full text]