DOCSLIB.ORG

October 12, 2017 Notices to Airmen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October 12, 2017 Notices to Airmen U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International October 12, 2017 Next Issue November 9, 2017 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team JANUARY − 2017 FEBRUARY − 2017 MARCH − 2017 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT ËË ËËË 1 2 3 4ËËË5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 ËËË ËË ËËË 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 26 27 28 26 27 28 29 30 31 ËËË ËËË APRIL − 2017 MAY − 2017 JUNE − 2017 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13ÊÊÊ4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20ÊÊÊ11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ËËË 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 ËË25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ËËË ËË ËËË 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 ËËË 30 JULY − 2017 AUGUST − 2017 SEPTEMBER − 2017 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ËË ËËË ËË ËËË 16 17 18 19ËËË20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 24 25 26ËËË27 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30 31 OCTOBER − 2017 NOVEMBER − 2017 DECEMBER − 2017 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 2 ËË ËËË 8 9 10 11ËËË12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ËË ËËË 15 16 17 18ËËË19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 = Cutoff dates for submitting NOTAMs to AJV−21 for next publication. ËË= Effective dates and cutoff dates for submitting information to (Twenty−three (23) days before effective date.) the Publications Staff, AJV−8 for next publication. (Twenty− ËË eight (28) days before next effective date.) ËË NOTICES TO AIRMEN October 12, 2017 Flight Data Center (FDC) NOTAM information current as of September 20, 2017 FDC NOTAMs listed through 7/8518 dated September 20, 2017 Prior to flight, pilots should always check with Flight Service for current NOTAMs (1−800−WX−BRIEF). TABLE OF CONTENTS General Information Title Page Publication Schedule ................................................................. v Subscription Information .............................................................. vi Foreword (criteria and procedures for submitting data for publication)......................... vii Contractions ........................................................................ x NOTAM ......................................................................... x Weather ......................................................................... xii PART 1. FDC NOTAMs Section 1. Airway NOTAMs Airway NOTAMs (listed alphabetically by ARTCC)........................................ 1−AN−1 Section 2. Airport, Facility and Procedural NOTAMs Content Criteria Airport, Facility, and Procedural NOTAMs (listed alphabetically by state or territory)............. 1−AFPN−1 Section 3. General NOTAMs General NOTAMs (listed by NOTAM number, beginning with the most recent).................. 1−GN−1 PART 2. Part 95 Revisions Revisions to Minimum En Route IFR Altitudes & Changeover Points.......................... 1−IFR−1 i Table of Contents Notices to Airmen Title Page PART 3. International NOTAMs General ............................................................................ 3−INTL−3 International Notices ................................................................. 3−INTL−5 Section 1: Flight Prohibitions, Potentially Hostile Situations, and Foreign Notices.............. 3−INTL−5 Section 2: International Oceanic Airspace Notices........................................ 3−INTL−13 General ........................................................................ 3−INTL−14 Region Specific ............................................................ 3−INTL−15 PART 4. Graphic Notices (Notices are listed in categories. For information on submitting graphic notices for publication, see page viii.) Control No. Category Page No. Section 1. General GEN17000 Cold Temperature Restricted Airports .................................. 4−GEN−3 GEN17001 Removal of Takeoff Obstacle Notes from Instrument Departure Charts ........ 4−GEN−24 Section 2. Special Operations MIL00003 Oregon/Washington. Lights Out Military Helicopter Operations .............. 4−MIL−3 MIL02005 Texas. Central and Southwest Texas Lights Out Military Helicopter Operations . 4−MIL−4 MIL05007 Wisconsin. Lights Out/Low Level Military Helicopter Operations ............ 4−MIL−5 MIL06003 Various Locations. Lights Out Military Helicopter Operations ............... 4−MIL−6 MIL15006 Arizona. Lights Out Operations ....................................... 4−MIL−8 MIL17009 Oklahoma. Temporary Restricted Area R−5602 ........................... 4−MIL−9 Section 3. Airport and Facility Notices Northeast United States NE10002 Pennsylvania. Special Authorization to Conduct Simultaneous Approaches to Runway 26 and Departures from Runway 27R ............................ 4−NE−3 NE05001 Maryland. Baltimore−Washington International Airport Standard Taxi Routes . 4−NE−4 NE10001 Massachusetts. KBOS Land & Hold Short Operations ...................... 4−NE−5 NE11002 Pennsylvania. Philadelphia International Airport, Runway 35 Arrivals Procedures “Tall Ship” in River Channel ................................ 4−NE−6 NE17000 Massachusetts. Prototype Runway Status Lights (RWSL) at Boston Logan International Airport (BOS) ........................................... 4−NE−8 Southeast United States SE10000 Georgia. Atlanta Preferred Arrival Routes ............................... 4−SE−3 SE10001 Georgia. Atlanta TRACON Visual Separation for Aircraft Transitioning between Atlanta ATCT and Atlanta Approach/Departure Control .................... 4−SE−4 SE11004 Georgia. Atlanta Tracon/Atlanta ARTCC/Augusta Approach Control Realign- ment of Airspace ................................................... 4−SE−6 SE11005 Georgia. ATL Reduced Divergence Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard Instrument Procedure ................................................ 4−SE−7 East Central United States ii Notices to Airmen Table of Contents EC08000 Ohio. Cleveland Hopkins International Airport Standard Taxi Route .......... 4−EC−3 EC10000 Michigan. Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport Standard Taxi Routes . 4−EC−5 EC14000 Illinois. Midway Airport (MDW) New RNAV Approaches to Runway 22L ..... 4−EC−7 EC15000 Illinois. Chicago O’Hare Runway 10R/28L Opens ......................... 4−EC−8 South Central United States SC09002 Louisiana. Non−Movement Area at Baton Rouge Metropolitan (BTR) Airport . 4−SC−3 SC11002 Texas. Houston Intercontinental ATC Tower and Houston Tracon Visual Separation Procedures ............................................... 4−SC−4 SC17000 Texas. Prototype Runway Status Lights (RWSL) at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) .......................................... 4−SC−5 North Central United States NC11001 Missouri. Visual Separation Procedures at Lambert−St. Louis ................ 4−NC−3 NC12001 Minnesota. Visual Separation Procedures at Minneapolis ATCT/ARTCC ....... 4−NC−4 Northwest United States NW03002 Washington. Concurrent Operations to Spokane International Airport and Fairchild Air Force Base ............................................. 4−NW−3 NW11001 Washington. Seattle Approach Control (S46) Concurrent Operations to Boeing Field (BFI) and Seattle−Tacoma International Airport ...................... 4−NW−5 Southwest United States SW01003 California. Los Angeles Center Limited Radar Services .................... 4−SW−3 SW04001 California. San Francisco SOIA/PRM .................................. 4−SW−4 SW10000 Colorado. Denver Standard Taxi Routes ................................. 4−SW−5 SW10001 California. Los Angeles (KLAX) Standard Taxi Routes .................... 4−SW−7 SW11002 California. VNY Simultaneous Same Direction Operations .................. 4−SW−8 SW13000 California. San Francisco Int’l Visual Flight Procedures .................... 4−SW−9 SW14000 California. LAX Noise Abatement Procedures ............................ 4−SW−11 SW17000 California. LAX Runway Status Lights (RWSLs) ......................... 4−SW−12 SW17001 California. Prototype Runway Status Lights (RWSL) at San Diego International Airport (SAN) ..................................................... 4−SW−14 SW17002 California. San Diego International Airport (SAN) Concurrent Operations to Naval Air Station North Island (NZY) .................................. 4−SW−15 SW17003 California. Jack Northrop Field/Hawthorne Municipal Airport (HHR) IFR Departures and Los Angeles Airport (LAX) IFR Arrivals ................... 4−SW−16 Alaska and Hawaii AH01001 Alaska. Anchorage Merrill Field Mode C Intruder Alert Services ............. 4−A&H−3 AH01009 Alaska. Lake Hood Seaplane Base Mode C Intruder Alert Services ........... 4−A&H−4 AH01010 Alaska. Point Mackenzie Area Mode C Intruder Alert Services .............. 4−A&H−5 AH03004 Alaska. Implementation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5. Airport Roles
    5. AIRPORT ROLES As part of GDOT’s prior airport system plans, criteria were identified to assign each airport in the state system to a role or level. In Georgia, airport levels generally reflect the type of users each airport accommodates and the facilities and services that the airport has in place. Levels also typically reflect the airport’s relative importance, as it relates to meeting the state’s transportation and economic needs and objectives. Further, airport levels are often matched to the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the communities the airport serves. This chapter of the update to the Georgia Statewide Airport System Plan (GSASP) provides the following: • Review of current airport roles. • Comparison of Georgia state airport levels/roles to roles for Georgia airports established by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in their ASSET Study or National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). • Discussion of the need to consider change to current airport levels. • Recommendations for changes to current airport levels. Chapter 6, Airport Facility and Service Objectives, examines the ability of each airport to meet facility and service objectives that are applicable to each airport’s recommended level. 5.1 Factors That Influence Current Roles for Georgia Airports Levels for Georgia airports were established in the 2002 GSASP; the following factors were considered in the 2002 system plan to assign Georgia airports to a level: • Coverage: Percentage of the state contained in an airport service area. This factor included the establishment of a 30-minute service area for each airport via a geographic information system (GIS) drive time analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Area Mobilization Center Guide
    Southern Area Mobilization Center Guide GEOGRAPHIC AREA MOBILIZATION CENTER ACTIVATION COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS The decision to activate a Geographic Area Mobilization Center will generally be a collaborative effort by the Region 8 Assistant Director, Operations, and the Southern Area Coordinator. A Geographic Area Mobilization Center may be activated when the following impacts are occurring: � ITEM Initials Date It’s March 20 and fires are occurring in the mountains (North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia). Deployment of 2 Teams has occurred. It’s October 22 and fires are occurring in the mountains. Deployment of 2 Teams has occurred. A Category IV or V hurricane is projected to hit the mainland within the next 3 days. Projected impact sites may include one or more states. 2 Teams are committed in the Southern Area and potential exists to stage additional Teams for deployment. This may include all-risk incidents. Several days (10-12) of multiple small fires have occurred in several States. Initial attack resources are becoming fatigued. A need to supplement Southern Area ground forces with crews and smoke-chasing squads is identified. Crews will be placed into Mobilization Centers, available for initial attack, as allocated by SACC/MAC. Southern crews are being mobilized outside the Southern Area and there is a need to bring them to a central location for jet transport. LOCATION CONSIDERATIONS: DRAFT Incident Management TeamsDRAFT can best be facilitated at a Mobilization Center established in Marietta, Georgia. Rationale includes: 1. Centrally located in the in the Southern Area 2. Close proximity to Region 8 Operations, SACC, Incident Business Advisor, and Safety for Team in-briefings and out-briefings 3.
    [Show full text]
  • March 30, 2017 NOTAM
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International March 30, 2017 Next Issue April 27, 2017 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team JANUARY − 2017 FEBRUARY − 2017 MARCH − 2017 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT ËË ËËË 1 2 3 4ËËË5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 ËËË ËË ËËË 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 26 27 28 26 27 28 29 30 31 ËËË ËËË APRIL − 2017 MAY − 2017 JUNE − 2017 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13ÊÊÊ4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20ÊÊÊ11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ËËË 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 ËË25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ËËË ËË ËËË 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 ËËË 30 JULY − 2017 AUGUST − 2017 SEPTEMBER − 2017 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ËË ËËË 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Purpose and Need
    Environmental Assessment for Atlanta Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex 2 Purpose and Need The FAA is preparing this EA to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of new RNAV-defined IFPs for the Atlanta Metroplex (Proposed Action). According to the CEQ regulations implementing NEPA, the purpose of and need for the action being proposed must be described in the EA.21 The following sections discuss the need for and the purpose of the Proposed Action. Following this discussion, the Proposed Action is described in detail. 2.1 The Need for the Proposed Action In the context of an EA, “need” refers to the problem that the Proposed Action intends to resolve. By law, the FAA must “develop plans and policy for the use of navigable airspace and assign by regulation or order the use of the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace.”22 Although RNAV based SIDs and STARs have been in effect in the Atlanta Metroplex since 2005, these procedures can be improved to increase efficient use of the airspace. For example, under current conditions, single departure routes rely upon a greater degree of divergence than necessary. This requires aircraft to fly more miles than necessary before diverging towards the exit points from A80 airspace. In addition, separation between traffic flows can be improved to increase lateral and vertical separation between traffic flows. Furthermore, several STARs lack defined transitions to specific runways, requiring controllers to use vectoring and speed adjustments to manage traffic. This leads to increased controller and pilot workload.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Aviation Activity Forecast – Silver Comet Field at Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport
    APPENDIX C AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECAST – SILVER COMET FIELD AT PAULDING NORTHWEST ATLANTA AIRPORT SILVER COMET FIELD AT PAULDING NORTHWEST ATLANTA AIRPORT Aviation Activity Forecast This aviation activity forecast is prepared in conjunction with the Environmental Assessment (“EA”) being conducted to assess the potential effects associated with the proposed Part 139 certification and other airport improvement projects at Silver Comet Field at the Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport ( the “Airport” or “KPUJ”). The Airport is currently a public use, general aviation airport located 24 miles northwest of Atlanta, officially opened in late 2008 with a 5,505 foot runway, the culmination of construction that began in mid-2006. Its 23,000 square foot state-of-the-art terminal building was completed in late 2009. The terminal facility has only a single boarding gate, and Paulding County has no plans to expand the facility. The Airport is owned by Paulding County and is administered through the Paulding County Airport Authority (PCAA). The Airport sustained significant damage in a March, 2012 EF-3 tornado. The terminal sustained roof and window damage. A large hangar was destroyed, and 18 of the 23 aircraft based at the Airport were destroyed. Repairs to the hangar and terminal were completed in the Fall of 2012. In addition to the Part 139 project, the airport improvement projects involve among other things, extending the runways and widening the taxiways. In October, 2013 the Airport entered into an agreement with Propeller Investments to manage the terminal building. Propeller Investments has initiated talks with carriers regarding potential commercial service at the Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Aviation System Plan
    Last Updated Summer 2003 GEORGIA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Acknowledgment This document was produced under the auspices of the GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION J. Tom Coleman, Jr., Commissioner OFFICE OF INTERMODAL PROGRAMS Hal Wilson, Administrator AVIATION PROGRAMS Edward S. Ratigan, Manager GEORGIA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE Thomas B. Carr, Jr., Project Manager STATE TRANSPORTATION BOARD 1st District – Harry Dixon 7th District – Steve Reynolds 2nd District – W. P. “Billy” Langdale 8th District – Sam Wellborn 3rd District – Ward Edwards 9th District – Jimmy Lester 4th District – Brad Hubbert 10thDistrict – Mike Evans 5th District – Emory C. McClinton 11thDistrict – David Doss 6th District – Johnny Gresham 12thDistrict – Jon Burns 13thDistrict – Dana L. Lemon Introduction Georgia is served by one of the most comprehensive and progressive aviation systems in the United States. To prepare a long-term plan to guide the development of this aviation system, it was necessary to follow an approach that will keep Georgia airports at the forefront of aviation. This executive summary highlights the findings from the Georgia Aviation In late 2001, Aviation Programs, Georgia Department of Transportation, began an update to its System Plan, as well as the Air statewide aviation system plan. It had been almost 10 years since the Georgia Aviation System Plan Service/Passenger Demand Analysis. had last been updated. This document is a summary of the technical report that was prepared to A separate study was conducted to document the System Plan. analyze the condition of pavements The update to the Georgia Aviation System Plan contained four components: at all Georgia airports. The Pavement Management Study outlines airport • THE SYSTEM PLAN specific actions that are needed to • AN AIR SERVICE/PASSENGER DEMAND ANALYSIS maintain and enhance the condition of • A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STUDY runways, taxiways, and apron areas • AN AVIATION TAX REVENUE STUDY at all system airports.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Airport Facility and Service Objectives Analysis
    6. AIRPORT FACILITY AND SERVICE OBJECTIVES ANALYSIS As part of the Georgia Statewide Aviation System Plan (GSASP), target objectives were established to enable airports to best fulfill their assigned level in the state airport system. Recommended levels for all system airports were identified in Chapter 5, Airport Roles. Facility and service objectives apply to airports in each of the following categories: Level I, Level II, and Level III. For this report, Level III airports have been separated into two categories, Commercial Service (Level III - Commercial Service) and General Aviation (Level III - General Aviation). Facility and service objectives are based on those established as part of the 2002 GSASP. They have been updated in some cases to reflect industry, technology, and regulatory changes. The facility and service adequacies and deficiencies identified in this chapter provide the foundation for final system recommendations, as well as for recommendations for individual study airports. It is possible that the recommendations from local airport master planning efforts could result in additional and/or different improvements other than those identified through this system plan. It is also worth noting that GSASP facility objectives reflect, by role, development that is considered desirable at each airport. It is possible that airport-specific conditions may justify development that exceeds an airport’s objectives identified in the GSASP. It is also possible that airport-specific conditions or constraints could prohibit an airport from achieving all of its GSASP-related objectives. Facility and service objectives for Georgia airports, by level, are presented in Table 6-1. This chapter analyzes and summarizes existing airside facilities, landside facilities, and services at 102 system airports.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement ......................................................................................A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, May 15, 2013 .................................................................................. A-3 A.1.2 Comments from the Early Notification Announcement ........................................................ A-15 A.2 Section 106 Consultation .................................................................................................. A-19 A.2.1 Section 106 Consultation Letter, December 2, 2013 ........................................................... A-21 A.2.2 Comments from the Section 106 Consultation Letter .......................................................... A-65 A i March 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 March 2014 Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK A-2 March 2014 Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, May 15, 2013 A-3 March 2014 Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK A-4 March 2014
    [Show full text]