ACEC-Canada Highlights March 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ACEC-Canada Highlights March 2014 Strengthening Consulting Engineering in Canada Left to right: ACEC press conference, Parliament Hill Day 2013; ACEC and stakeholders with Prime Minister Stephen Harper at announcement of the New Building Canada Plan; ACEC Chair Jason Mewis What We Are Achieving March 2014 for Our Members ACEC advocates for a business and Highlights regulatory climate that recognizes and rewards our members’ expertise and their • Launching a New Building Canada contributions to society. To achieve these Plan goals, ACEC works closely with its provincial and territorial Member Organizations to • Making a Case for Northern educate and influence government and Infrastructure Investment other stakeholders on issues important to our members. ACEC also works closely with • Promoting Responsible Resource other organizations representing both public and private sector stakeholders such as the Development Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Mining • Fighting for Business Fairness Association of Canada and the Canadian Construction Association. • ACEC – A Nationally and Internationally Recognized Voice Learn more about ACEC’s successful and comprehensive advocacy program at www.acec.ca/advocacy. The Association of Consulting Engineering Companies - Canada (ACEC) is a business association representing nearly 500 consulting engineering firms. Consulting engineering is a $25.8 billion a year industry that directly employs more than 75,000 Canadians. The vision of the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies is a successful, trusted and sustainable consulting engineering industry. Launching a New Building Canada Plan The $53 billion New Building Canada Plan (NBCP) announced in February 2014 by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Minister of Infrastructure, Hon. Denis Lebel was welcome news for consulting engineers and their clients. ACEC’s leadership and credibility on the issue of long- term, sustainable funding contributed significantly to the ACEC representatives conveyed to parliamentarians the importance of investing in Canada’s infrastructure government’s renewed commitment to infrastructure. ACEC and its stakeholder partners have invested significant “ACEC’s leadership and credibility time, energy and resources in promoting infrastructure on the issue of long-term, investment by the federal government. Over the course of this journey, we have worked closely with the Federation sustainable funding contributed of Canadian Municipalities, the Canadian Construction significantly to the government’s Association, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and Engineers Canada, to name a few. renewed commitment to infrastructure.” In October 2013, ACEC held its annual Parliament Hill Day, the largest and most successful yet. ACEC representatives had over 65 meetings with parliamentarians to stress the urgency of Making a Case for launching the NBCP. Northern Infrastructure Following Parliament Hill Day, and leading up to the NBCP Investment announcement, ACEC President John Gamble met with representatives in Minister Lebel’s office and the Prime As part of Parliament Hill Day messaging, ACEC raised the Minister’s Office. Thanks to ACEC’s expertise, credibility and importance of supporting northern and remote infrastructure strong presence on Parliament Hill, the association clearly has for improving access to Canada’s natural resources and allowing the government’s attention on this critical issue. their transport to market. This will not only strengthen Canada’s economy, but it will also allow Canada’s resource sector to create skilled jobs and develop expertise while making public infrastructure for northern communities more affordable and effective. ACEC is collaborating directly with the Mining Association of Canada, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada and other resource sector stakeholders to study the unique challenges of doing business in the North and to identify possible policies and/or programs to encourage more investment. Investing in the North will strengthen Canada’s resource sector During ACEC’s Parliament Hill Day, representatives of the consulting and provide opportunities to improve community infrastructure engineering sector had over 65 meetings with Members of Parliament in remote regions of the country. Promoting Responsible Resource Development ACEC is actively engaged with the resource sector and is committed to providing more value and opportunity to members of the association in that sector through advocacy and other activities. Science-based environmental ACEC President John Gamble speaks out on energy infrastructure and the role of consulting engineers in addressing environmental and sustainability concerns reviews “ACEC is recognized as a ACEC partnered with the Mining Association of Canada and other stakeholders to challenge a potentially precedent-setting balanced and credible voice decision by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency on the economic benefits (CEAA) that could adversely affect our members. of responsible resource ACEC and the stakeholder community sought an explanation development.” from Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver as to why a recent decision by the CEAA on an economically significant mining to Canadians but also the ability and expertise of consulting project apparently ignored engineered design features that engineers to help address environmental and sustainability would have considerably reduced the potential environmental concerns. impacts of the mine. ACEC and its partners opposed the CEAA’s decision as it could set a precedent that will Similarly, in December 2013, ACEC issued a press release significantly impact the viability of future mining and resource welcoming the work of an independent Joint Review Panel and development projects across Canada. its finding that the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline fits squarely within Canada’s national interest and is important to Economic benefits of energy Canada’s long-term prosperity. infrastructure Consulting engineers involved with such projects, directly or indirectly, conduct themselves in accordance with all statutory ACEC has also been recognized as a balanced and credible voice and regulatory requirements, applicable standards and their on the economic benefits of the proposed Northern Gateway professional obligations. and Keystone XL pipelines. This is an area in which consulting engineering firms will and must have an important role to play. ACEC-Canada and ACEC-US presented a unified voice in the fall of 2013 when they sent a joint letter to the U.S. and Canadian governments supporting approval of the Keystone XL pipeline which is considered critical energy infrastructure. As a result of the letter, ACEC President John Gamble has spoken to national media on this issue including CTV’s Don Martin on the national political affairs show Power Play. Mr. Gamble stressed not only the economic opportunities available The Association of Consulting Engineering Companies-Canada (ACEC) is made up of 12 provincial and territorial Member Organizations. For more information on how to reach our Member Organizations please visit www.acec.ca/about. Fighting for Business the Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) and the International Federation of Consulting Engineers Fairness (FIDIC). Protecting Statements of ACEC – A Nationally Limitations and Internationally Recognized Voice ACEC took a stand in the summer of 2013 when Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) informed ACEC is governed by its members. A Board of Directors its engineering consultants that it would no longer accept establishes strategic priorities and a full time staff is responsible reports containing Statements of Limitations. ACEC challenged for day-to-day operations of the association. this position, believing that PWGSC misunderstood the intent and use of such Statements of Limitations. After ACEC raised The ACEC staff, based near Parliament Hill in Ottawa, is made its concerns with senior officials, PWGSC issued a clarification up of government relations, communications and association on its position, advising they will continue to accept Statements management professionals. Services are provided to ACEC of Limitations that provide necessary contextual background members in either official language. ACEC staff are regarded for work undertaken by the consultant and guidance as to the as experts within their fields and are frequently invited to make context in which reports should be read. presentations on both industry and association issues, nationally and internationally. Fair business agreements ACEC is a recipient of the prestigious Associations Make We work with our members, insurance experts and leading a Better Canada award from the Canadian Society of industry lawyers to provide a suite of professional service Association Executives for an advertising campaign to promote agreements for consulting engineering companies and their Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS). clients. These documents are free to ACEC members. In addition to our full suite of ACEC professional service agreements, we are also an official supplier of documents from Left to right: Hon. Ralph Goodale, P.C., M.P. and ACEC Chair Jason Mewis; ACEC Chair-Elect Anne Poschmann, ACEC President John Gamble and Hon. Peter Van Loan P.C., M.P., Leader of the Government in the House of Commons; ACEC Past-Chair Murray Thompson, Mr. Corneliu Chisu, M.P. and ACEC Board member Shawn Gibbons 420-130 Albert Street, Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4 P.O. Box 1547, Station Main, Winnipeg, MB R3C 2Z4 Tel.: (613) 236-0569 Fax: (613) 236-6193 Tel: (204) 774-5258, Fax: (204) 779-0788 www.acec.ca www.acec-mb.ca.
Recommended publications
  • January 15, 2021 Mr. Terry Young Interim President and Chief
    Ministry of Energy, Ministère de l’Énergie, Northern Development du Développement du Nord and Mines et des Mines Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre 77 Grenville Street, 10th Floor 77, rue Grenville, 10e étage Toronto ON M7A 2C1 Toronto ON M7A 2C1 Tel.: 416-327-6758 Tél. : 416-327-6758 MC-994-2020-1089 January 15, 2021 Mr. Terry Young Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Independent Electricity System Operator 1600-120 Adelaide Street West Toronto ON M5H 1T1 Dear Mr. Young: I am writing in regard to the existing Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) between Atlantic Power and the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) for the Calstock generating facility. Earlier this year, the facility was granted a six-month extension until December 16, 2020, to address the substantial economic impact on the community of shutting down the facility. The government of Ontario recognizes the importance of the forestry sector and supports a longer-term transition plan to find alternative uses for the waste biomass, however this transition plan will take time to implement (i.e., approximately five-years). In light of the implementation considerations, I am asking the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) to enter into preliminary discussions with Atlantic Power and report back on potential options to contract the Calstock facility for five-years. These discussions should ensure ratepayer value while considering Atlantic Power’s revenue requirements. The IESO may also wish to consider reducing the generator output where feasible while considering impacts on local forestry operations. Re- contracting Calstock would help mitigate impacts to the waste biomass supply chain in northern Ontario, while they transition to alternative uses over the long-term.
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis Ashley Stewart Major Research
    Running head: NEWS MEDIA FRAMING OF BILL C-51 News Media Framing of Bill C-51: A Content Analysis Ashley Stewart Major research paper submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Communication Date: August 17, 2015 Department of Communication Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa Supervisor: Dr. Sherry Ferguson © Ashley Stewart, Ottawa, Canada, 2015 NEWS MEDIA FRAMING OF BILL C-51 i Abstract The government introduced a controversial new Anti-Terrorism Act (Bill C-51) on January 30, 2015, in response to the changing nature of threats to Canadians. This study sets out to examine how the mainstream media framed the debate over Bill C-51 from the introduction of the bill to the government’s introduction of amendments on March 31, 2015. Using agenda setting and framing theories, this study looks at the relationship between the media agenda and the policy agenda. The bill received significant coverage over this period, dominating the media agenda. Using content analysis, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of The Globe and Mail’s coverage of the issue to examine which stakeholders and opinion leaders were most frequently cited, the major arguments for the legislation and the perceived shortcomings and risks associated with the legislation, and the number and nature of the suggested solutions (to make the legislation more acceptable) that found their way into the government’s proposed amendments. Key findings indicate that, although the government introduced amendments that addressed some of the concerns expressed, these amendments did not include the most frequently mentioned concern: the lack of Parliamentary oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • SFU Thesis Template Files
    The Right to Authentic Political Communication by Ann Elizabeth Rees M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2005 B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1980 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Communication Faculty of Arts and Social Science Ann Elizabeth Rees 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2016 Approval Name: Ann Elizabeth Rees Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: The Right to Authentic Political Communication Examining Committee: Chair: Katherine Reilly, Assistant Professor Peter Anderson Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Catherine Murray Supervisor Professor Alison Beale Supervisor Professor Andrew Heard Internal Examiner Associate Professor Political Science Department Paul Thomas External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of Political Studies University of Manitoba Date Defended/Approved: January 22, 2016 ii Abstract Increasingly, governments communicate strategically with the public for political advantage, seeking as Christopher Hood describes it to “avoid blame” and “claim credit” for the actions and decisions of governance. In particular, Strategic Political Communication (SPC) is becoming the dominant form of political communication between Canada’s executive branch of government and the public, both during elections and as part of a “permanent campaign” to gain and maintain public support as means to political power. This dissertation argues that SPC techniques interfere with the public’s ability to know how they are governed, and therefore undermines the central right of citizens in a democracy to legitimate elected representation by scrutinizing government and holding it to account. Realization of that right depends on an authentic political communication process that provides citizens with an understanding of government. By seeking to hide or downplay blameworthy actions, SPC undermines the legitimation role public discourse plays in a democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..192 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 9.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 142 Ï NUMBER 028 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, November 30, 2007 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1569 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, November 30, 2007 The House met at 10 a.m. were able to eliminate the national deficit and pay down the national debt. The present government has inherited a very strong fiscal framework, all due to good Liberal management. Prayers The one area that the Conservative government has failed on, and I am glad to see that the minister is here today, is the urban Ï (1005) community agenda. [English] In 1983 the Federation of Canadian Municipalities proposed an CRIMINAL CODE infrastructure program to deal with decaying infrastructure in (Bill C-376. On the Order. Private Members' Bills:) Canada. However, in 1984, the new Conservative government let it lay dormant for 10 years. I know something about this because I Second reading of Bill C-376, An Act to amend the Criminal was president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities at one Code (impaired driving) and to make consequential amendments to time. other Acts—Mr. Ron Cannan. Mr. Tom Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of There seems to be a pattern here. When we came into office, we the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for brought in a national infrastructure program. We dealt with cities and Democratic Reform, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Shuffle Fallout Harper's Ministry Canada's North
    CANADA’S HARPER’S SHUFFLE NORTH MINISTRY FALLOUT The Hill Times’ extensive policy Get all you need to know about PM Post-shuffle, Tory staffers are upset briefing on Canada’s North. p. 15-29 Harper’s shuffle. p. 1, 3, 4, 6, 10 with the PMO’s HR management. p. 34 EIGHTEENTH YEAR, NO. 901 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2007 $4.00 Harper’s MacKay and Cabinet shuffle Bernier the plays well in new stars of Quebec, says Cabinet, but new poll did MacKay get Of all the moves, Chuck promotion? Strahl’s jump into indian and northern affairs is seen least ‘If MacKay doesn’t carry Afghani- favourably by the public stan, defence and so on, and shore up some support in Atlan- By BEA VONGDOUANGCHANH tic Canada, Harper fails. And I The Conservatives made suspect Harper...has figured that inroads in Quebec with its Cabinet out,’ says Prof. Donald Savoie shuffle last Tuesday, according to a new poll by Innovative Research Group for The Hill Times, which By CHRISTOPHER GULY shows that, as a result of the shuf- Photograph by Jake Wright, The Hill Times fle, Quebecers are twice as likely Cabinet shuffle time should be happy time, people: From left to right: Indian and Northern Affairs Minister Chuck Peter MacKay and Maxime Ber- to be more favourable to the gov- Strahl, Defence Minister Peter MacKay, National Revenue Minister Gordon O’Connor, International Cooperation nier—the young, handsome, telege- ernment than the rest of Canada. Minister Bev Oda, Industry Minister Jim Prentice, and Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..182 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 14.00)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 044 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, November 4, 2011 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 2961 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, November 4, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. Mr. Chris Alexander: Mr. Speaker, I rise again in support of the bill that addresses the urgent need to ensure the proper functioning of our military justice system. Prayers The bill comes to us in the context of two facts that I think all hon. members will recognize. One, a legal circumstance that places GOVERNMENT ORDERS additional pressure on all of us to ensure the smooth functioning of our military justice system, one that has served Canada well for Ï (1005) decades. We just celebrated the centenary of the Office of the Judge Advocate General without a challenge to its constitutionality. I will [English] come back to that issue and delve into the circumstances that have SECURITY OF TENURE OF MILITARY JUDGES ACT led to a danger of that happening. Hon. Bev Oda (for the Minister of National Defence) moved that Bill C-16, An Act to amend the National Defence Act (military judges), be read the second time and referred to a committee. This is a measure that has been considered in the House three times during three previous Parliament when bills were brought Mr. Chris Alexander (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister forward that provided for exactly the very limited measures that are of National Defence, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Oil's Oily Grasp
    Big Oil’s Oily Grasp The making of Canada as a Petro-State and how oil money is corrupting Canadian politics Daniel Cayley-Daoust and Richard Girard Polaris Institute December 2012 The Polaris Institute is a public interest research organization based in Canada. Since 1997 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies to take action on major public policy issues, including the corporate power that lies behind public policy making, on issues of energy security, water rights, climate change, green economy and global trade. Polaris Institute 180 Metcalfe Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone: 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org Cover image by Malkolm Boothroyd Table of Contents Introduction 1 1. Corporations and Industry Associations 3 2. Lobby Firms and Consultant Lobbyists 7 3. Transparency 9 4. Conclusion 11 Appendices Appendix A, Companies ranked by Revenue 13 Appendix B, Companies ranked by # of Communications 15 Appendix C, Industry Associations ranked by # of Communications 16 Appendix D, Consultant lobby firms and companies represented 17 Appendix E, List of individual petroleum industry consultant Lobbyists 18 Appendix F, Recurring topics from communications reports 21 References 22 ii Glossary of Acronyms AANDC Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada CAN Climate Action Network CAPP Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CEPA Canadian Energy Pipelines Association CGA Canadian Gas Association DPOH
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Launches Permanent Commemorative Photo Exhibit Celebrating Icao Presence in Montréal
    CANADA LAUNCHES PERMANENT COMMEMORATIVE PHOTO EXHIBIT CELEBRATING ICAO PRESENCE IN MONTRÉAL MONTRÉAL, 25 September 2013 – ICAO Secretary General, Raymond Benjamin, was joined today by the Honourable Denis Lebel, Minister of Infrastructure, Communities, and Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec, on behalf of the Honourable Lisa Raitt, Federal Minister of Transport, at the unveiling of a new photo exhibit at the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO’s) Headquarters in Montréal entitled: “Montréal and ICAO: A Panoramic View of our History” The 30-panel photo exhibit donated by the Government of Canada provides a historical view of Montréal’s contribution to international civil aviation since 1907. It also marks 2013 as the 30th time Canada has hosted an Assembly on behalf of the Organization, which now comprises 191 Member States. “ICAO is very grateful to Canada for this excellent exhibit which will now be permanently located within our Montréal Headquarters,” commented ICAO Secretary General, Raymond Benjamin. “Its depictions of ICAO’s long history here in Montréal are particularly fitting given Canada’s strong historic commitment to our Organization and, by extension, to the entire global civil aviation community we serve.” “Canada is proud of its rich history with this important UN organization, in particular, our contribution through government support at various levels as well as synergies with private industry and academia. The new photo exhibit celebrates this history, while motivating us to keep that legacy going forward,” said Minister Lebel. “As an international leader in aviation safety and security, Canada supports ICAO’s efforts to ensure aviation worldwide is not only safe and secure, but also economically and environmentally sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Falling Short: Suboptimal Outcomes in Canadian Defence Procurement
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-09-26 Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement MacMillan, Ian MacMillan, I. (2018). Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/33132 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108780 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement by Ian MacMillan A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2018 © Ian MacMillan 2018 Abstract Why do Canada’s military procurement projects often fall short of their primary goals? Otherwise known as a suboptimal result, defence acquisitions regularly fall short of established delivery schedules, accruing cost-overruns, sometimes resulting in cancellation of key materiel. One-hundred percent of the twenty-five Major Crown Projects at the Department of National Defence have experienced delays in achieving key milestones. Aside from cost, suboptimal results are injurious to Canada’s tri-force military. Fortunately, the matter has not gone unchecked. A fairly recent surge in procurement research has generated a critical mass of Canadian-focused literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived .Pdf
    Yves Côté Commissioner of Canada Elections c/o Elections Canada 30 Victoria Street Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0M6 RE: Questions about the relationship between Ethical Oil and the Conservative Party of Canada that we believe merit investigation April 7, 2014 Dear M. Côté, I am writing with regards to the activities of the Ethical Oil Institute (Ethical Oil) and the Conservative Party of Canada (Conservative Party). A. Summary of questions we believe merit investigation Ethical Oil states on its website that it receives donations from businesses, and possibly also donations in excess of $1,200 annually from individuals. Given the many ties between Ethical Oil and the Conservative Party, I believe that this situation raises questions that merit investigation to determine if Ethical Oil is colluding with the Conservative Party to violate the measures in the Canada Elections Act (S.C. 2000, c. 9 -- CEA) that prohibit donations to federal political parties from businesses, and possibly also violating the measure in the CEA that prohibits donations to parties in excess of $1,200 annually from individuals. B. Evidence that Ethical Oil Institute receives donations from businesses The Ethical Oil Institute does not publicly disclose its funding sources, but its website states that it does “accept donations from Canadian individuals and companies, including those working to produce Ethical Oil.” This indicates clearly that the organization receives corporate contributions. C. Evidence of ties between Ethical Oil and the Conservative Party There is compelling evidence of a direct relationship and a coordinated communications strategy between the Ethical Oil Institute and the CPC, including mirrored messaging from the Ethical Oil Institute and Conservative Cabinet Ministers, and crossover between the Ethical Oil Institute staff and Ministerial staff.
    [Show full text]
  • 10-125E-2011-12-13 Letter from AANDC Minister Re Review.Pdf
    Mlnistre des Affaires autochtones Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and ct du developpement du Nord Northern Development Ottawa. Canada K1A OH4 DEC 13 2011 Mr. Ron Roach Chairperson Nunavut Pfanning Commission RANKIN INLET NU XOC OGO Dear Mr. Roach: Thank you for your letters of October 20 and November 29, 2011, pertaining to your Commission's land use planning process. As you are aware, I was also copied on your October 25, 2011 letter on the same topic to each of the Honourable Daniel Shewchuk, then Minister of the Environment for the Government of Nunavut, and Ms. Cathy Towtongie, President of Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., respectively. I am pleased that your Commission has agreed to participate in a third-party review of the planning process. Consistent with our ongoing engagement, the Department remains ready to collaborate on the development of the land use plan. However, I note with considerable concem the Implication repeated in each of your letters that deficiencies in the process, to date, lie principally with the governments of Canada and Nunavut, or with Nunavut Tunngavlk Inc. It is important to remember that, as an administrative tribunal, the Commission should be open to reconsideration of the procedural fairness and effectiveness of the processes. You Indicated that the rationale provided to your Commission for the third-party review is that Canada, the Government of Nunavut and Nunavut Tunngavik Inc... are unable to determine whether the land use planning prooess is appropriate." Canada has assessed the present process and has raised serious concerns. Most recently, on October 11, 2011, I wrote to you to highlight that the planning process was Inadequate and have identified the need for a "fundamental change in the approach to the planning process." ' understand from the previous correspondence that the Government of Nunavut and Nunavut Tunngavik Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Choice Mps
    2015 Canada Election Results – Anti-choice MPs October 21, 2015 (Revised April 25, 2016 to remove Jim Hillyer; deceased) (Revised May 3 to move Tom Kmiec from Unknown to Anti-choice because he supports Bill C-225) (Revised May 30 to move Cathy McLeod from Unknown to Anti-choice because she supports Bill C-225) By Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada History: Prior to 2015 election (last updated Feb 2015) After May 2011 election (last updated Sept 2012) After 2008 election (last updated April 2011) Past sources are listed at History links. Anti-choice Anti-choice Total Pro-choice Unknown Incumbents Who Party Anti-choice MPs** Incumbents Seats MPs*** Stance Resigned Defeated Before Election Liberal 184 7* (4%) 177* (96%) not counted* 0 0 Conservative 98 55 (56%) 4 (4%) 39 (40%) 35 28 NDP 44 0 44 0 0 0 Bloc 10 0 10 0 0 0 Quebecois Green 1 0 1 0 0 0 Independent 0 0 0 0 1 1 Total 337 62 (18%) 236 (70%) 39 (11.5%) 36 29 (Excluding Libs: 16%) *All Liberal MPs have agreed and will be required to vote pro-choice on any abortion-related bills/motions. Also, Trudeau won’t likely allow anti-choice MPs to introduce their own bills/motions, or publicly advocate against abortion rights. Therefore, these MPs should not pose any threat, although they should be monitored. Likewise, Liberal MPs not on this 2014 pro-choice list may warrant monitoring to ensure they adhere to the party’s pro-choice policy. **Anti-choice MPs are designated as anti-choice based on at least one of these reasons: Voted in favour of Bill C-484 and/or Bill C-510 and/or Motion 312 Opposed the Order of Canada for Dr.
    [Show full text]