DOCSLIB.ORG

Hoogbouw: Eisen En Richtlijnen Brandveiligheid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hoogbouw: Eisen En Richtlijnen Brandveiligheid analyse huidige praktijk hoogbouw: eisen en richtlijnen brandveiligheid datum : 30 januari 2003 V2B0 Advies dossier : HOOG Rijksstraatweg 269, nummer : 0244-01.R 3956 CP LEERSUM status : eindrapport telefoon: 0343-469929 fax: 0343-469977 in opdracht van het ministerie van VROM [email protected] 2 / 90 V2BO Advies V2BO Advies 3 / 90 0244-01/ brandveiligheidseisen hoogbouw V2BO Advies INHOUD 1 Inleiding ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Vraagstelling....................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Nadere afbakening............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Opbouw van het rapport .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.4 Verantwoording ................................................................................................................................................. 8 2 Ontwikkelingen in de Nederlandse hoogbouw.......................................................................................10 2.1 Aantal gebouwen en gebouwhoogte............................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Geografische spreiding.................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Bestemming en gebruik................................................................................................................................... 12 3 Landelijke Regelgeving en lokale richtlijnen............................................................................................ 14 3.1 Bouwbesluit en bouwverordening ................................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Invulling van lokaal beleid ............................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Rotterdam.......................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Amsterdam ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.3 Den Haag........................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.4 Vergelijking van lokale richtlijnen................................................................................................................. 17 4 Zes hoogbouwprojecten................................................................................................................................. 24 4.1 Mondriaan Toren in Amsterdam ................................................................................................................... 25 4.1.1 ontwerp ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 4.1.2 proces................................................................................................................................................................. 27 4.1.3 invulling brandveiligheidseisen..................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.4 brandveiligheidprofiel..................................................................................................................................... 30 4.2 Fortis Bank in Rotterdam ................................................................................................................................ 32 4.2.1 ontwerp ............................................................................................................................................................. 32 4.2.2 proces................................................................................................................................................................. 33 4.2.3 invulling brandveiligheidseisen..................................................................................................................... 35 4.2.4 brandveiligheidprofiel..................................................................................................................................... 36 4.3 Achmeatoren in Leeuwarden ......................................................................................................................... 38 4.3.1 ontwerp ............................................................................................................................................................. 38 4.3.2 proces................................................................................................................................................................. 40 4.3.3 invulling brandveiligheidseisen..................................................................................................................... 42 4.3.4 brandveiligheidprofiel..................................................................................................................................... 44 4.4 Leonardo da Vinci in Scheveningen .............................................................................................................. 45 4.4.1 ontwerp ............................................................................................................................................................. 45 4.4.2 proces................................................................................................................................................................. 46 4.4.3 invulling brandveiligheidseisen..................................................................................................................... 48 4.4.4 brandveiligheidprofiel..................................................................................................................................... 50 4.5 Hoge heren in Rotterdam................................................................................................................................ 51 4.5.1 ontwerp ............................................................................................................................................................. 51 4.5.2 proces................................................................................................................................................................. 53 4.5.3 invulling brandveiligheidseisen..................................................................................................................... 54 4.5.4 brandveiligheidprofiel..................................................................................................................................... 56 4.6 Westpoint in Tilburg........................................................................................................................................ 57 4.6.1 ontwerp ............................................................................................................................................................. 57 4.6.2 proces................................................................................................................................................................. 59 4.6.3 invulling brandveiligheidseisen..................................................................................................................... 60 4.6.4 brandveiligheidprofiel..................................................................................................................................... 62 V2BO Advies 4 / 90 0244-01/ brandveiligheidseisen hoogbouw V2BO Advies 5 Uniformering en Instrumentarium.............................................................................................................. 64 5.1 Veranderd rollenpatroon ................................................................................................................................ 64 5.2 Meningen en standpunten .............................................................................................................................. 65 5.2.1 Standpunten van (belangen)organisaties...................................................................................................... 65 5.2.2 Uitspraken van gesprekspartners .................................................................................................................. 66 5.2.3 Meningen samengevat..................................................................................................................................... 69 5.3 Drie uitwerkingsrichtingen............................................................................................................................. 70 5.3.1 Scenario A: niets doen (voortzetting huidige praktijk) ............................................................................... 70 5.3.2 Scenario B: niet-wettelijke oplossing (landelijke praktijkrichtlijn) ........................................................... 70 5.3.3 Scenario C: wettelijke oplossing (prestatie-eisen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bijlage 1: Lijst Hoogbouw 70 Meter En Hoger Verdie- Nr
    Bijlage 1: Lijst hoogbouw 70 meter en hoger Verdie- Nr. Naam Stad Functie Bouwjaar pingen Hoogte 1 Montevideo Rotterdam Wonen 2005 43 152 2 Delftse Poort Rotterdam Kantoor 1991 41 151 3 Hoftoren Den Haag Kantoor 2003 29 142 4 Westpoint Tilburg Wonen 2004 48 142 5 Rembrandt Toren Amsterdam Kantoor 1995 35 135 6 Het Strijkijzer Den Haag Wonen 2008 41 132 7 Millennium Rotterdam Kantoor 2000 34 131 8 The Red Apple Rotterdam Wonen 2008 38 127 9 World Port Center Rotterdam Kantoor 2001 32 123 10 Mondriaan Toren Amsterdam Kantoor 2002 31 123 11 Achmea Leeuwarden Kantoor 2002 28 115 12 Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam Onderwijs 1968 26 112 13 Prinsenhof Den Haag Kantoor 2005 25 109 14 Waterstadtoren Rotterdam Wonen 2004 36 109 15 Fortis Bank Blaak Rotterdam Kantoor 1996 28 107 16 Weenatoren Rotterdam Wonen 1990 32 106 17 Coopvaert Rotterdam Wonen 2006 29 106 18 World Trade Center Tower 6 Amsterdam Kantoor 2004 27 105 19 ABN AMRO hoofdkantoor Amsterdam Kantoor 1999 24 105 20 De Admirant Eindhoven Wonen 2006 31 105 21 Symphony I Amsterdam Wonen 2008 29 105 22 Weenacenter Rotterdam Wonen 1990 32 104 23 Castalia Den Haag Kantoor 1998 20 104 24 Hoge Heren I Rotterdam Wonen 2000 34 102 25 Hoge Heren II Rotterdam Wonen 2000 34 102 26 Schielandtoren Rotterdam Wonen 1996 32 101 27 Provinciehuis Noord Brabant Den Bosch Kantoor 1971 23 101 28 De Stadsheer Tilburg Wonen 2007 31 101 29 Porthos Eindhoven Wonen 2006 31 101 30 Mahler 4 Amsterdam Kantoor 2005 25 100 31 Oosterbaken Hoogvliet Wonen 2006 32 99 32 Pegasus Rotterdam Wonen 2002 31 98 33 Millennium
    [Show full text]
  • The Volcanic Foundation of Dutch Architecture: Use of Rhenish Tuff and Trass in the Netherlands in the Past Two Millennia
    The volcanic foundation of Dutch architecture: Use of Rhenish tuff and trass in the Netherlands in the past two millennia Timo G. Nijland 1, Rob P.J. van Hees 1,2 1 TNO, PO Box 49, 2600 AA Delft, the Netherlands 2 Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands Occasionally, a profound but distant connection between volcano and culture exists. This is the case between the volcanic Eifel region in Germany and historic construction in the Netherlands, with the river Rhine as physical and enabling connection. Volcanic tuff from the Eifel comprises a significant amount of the building mass in Dutch built heritage. Tuffs from the Laacher See volcano have been imported and used during Roman occupation (hence called Römer tuff). It was the dominant dimension stone when construction in stone revived from the 10th century onwards, becoming the visual mark of Romanesque architecture in the Netherlands. Römer tuff gradually disappeared from the market from the 12th century onwards. Early 15th century, Weiberner tuff from the Riedener caldera, was introduced for fine sculptures and cladding; it disappears from use in about a century. Late 19th century, this tuff is reintroduced, both for restoration and for new buildings. In this period, Ettringer tuff, also from the Riedener caldera, is introduced for the first time. Ground Römer tuff (Rhenish trass) was used as a pozzolanic addition to lime mortars, enabling the hydraulic engineering works in masonry that facilitated life and economics in the Dutch delta for centuries. Key words: Tuff, trass, Eifel, the Netherlands, natural stone 1 Introduction Volcanic tuffs have been used as building stone in many countries over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Despite the Current Recession in the Dutch Building Industry, Construction
    Rotterdam, CENTRAAL STATION (****– 2013) Architect: Team CS met Maarten Struijs 1 Address: Stationsplein 1 ZEECONTAINER RESTAURANT (2005) 15 Architect: Bijvoet architectuur & Stadsontwerp large and small Address: Loods Celebes 101 HOGE HEREN (2005) RED APPLE (2009) Architect: Wiel Arets Architects Address: Gedempte Zalmhaven 179 Despite the current recession in the Dutch building industry, Architect: KCAP Architects & Planners 10 construction – of both the large-scale high-rise projects typical 6 Address: Wijnbrugstraat 200 of this city and more modest ‘infill’ architecture – continues apace in Rotterdam. ACHTERHAVEN (2011) THE NETHERLANDS — TEXT: Emiel Lamers, photography: Sonia Mangiapane, Illustration: Loulou&Tummie Architect: Studio Sputnik 16 Address: Achterhaven otterdam is one of the few old cities line. Since the construction of the Erasmus No one arriving in Rotterdam by train can is regarded as a monument of the post-war n der Hoek in Europe characterized by massive Bridge in 1996, the centre has expanded miss the massive reconstruction of Centraal reconstruction of the city. If all goes according A rd v KUNSTHAL (1992) high-rise in the centre of the city. In across the river to the poorer, southern part of Station (1). The original station hall de- to plan, it will be integrated with the new mu- A R All Architect: Rem Koolhaas, Fumi Hoshino OMA SCHIEBLOCK (2011) one night of heavy bombing on 14 May 1940, the city where two new districts, Kop van Zuid signed by Sybold van Ravesteyn in 1957, has nicipal offices (4), scheduled to open here in Address: Westzeedijk 341 CULTUURCENTRUM WORM (2011) 11 at the beginning of World War II, Rotterdam and Wilhelminapier, now boast some impres- made way for a much more spacious, raked March 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA HPC 2017 Rotterdam City Brochure
    12th IEA HEAT PUMP CONFERENCE 2017 Rotterdam 12TH IEA HEAT PUMP CONFERENCE WORLD TRADE CENTER ROTTERDAM 15 - 18 MAY 2017 ‘We’re from Rotterdam - we’ll keep going!’ appeared on a placard just days after by combining heat pumps with thermal the city was devastated by the WWII aerial bombings on 14 May 1940. This motto energy storage (ATES) in principal in many ways typifies the resolute character of Rotterdam and its inhabitants. In always in combination with district the war’s aftermath, a buzzing metropolis was built literally on the post-blitz ruins, heating. including a heating-network throughout the center. Sustainability is an important element In Rotterdam today, immigrants from over 170 different nations help create the city’s of Rotterdam’s vision. The thermal open and cosmopolitan atmosphere. The resolute perseverance of Rotterdam’s energy plan for the underground makes citizens still defines the city’s continual push for innovation at all levels of business, room for heat pump projects. Room for government and community life. innovation, but also literally: room to prevent interference between different Rotterdam is synonymous with innovation, whether it is in architecture, the creative sector thermal storage projects. or the port. Home to Europe’s largest port, Rotterdam is often a trendsetter. Just think of the Maasvlakte II project, extending the port into the sea, and of the architectural tours Rotterdam shows that having district de force in the Kop van Zuid district. heating does not exclude heat pumps nor energy storage, having this base The city on the Maas river is home to the offices of many of the world’s leading load opens opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking in the Hague
    EN Walking in The Hague NINE CENTURIES OF HAGUE ARCHITECTURE A walking tour along historic and modern buildings in The Hague www.denhaag.com 1 Walking in The Hague Nine centuries of Hague architecture Welcome to The Hague. For over 400 years now, the city has been the seat of the Dutch government. Since 1981, it is a royal city again and a city of peace and justice. The Hague is more than 750 years old and has, over the last century-and-a-half, developed into a large urban conglomerate, with a great deal of activity, cultural facilities and first-rate shops. From a town of 75,000 inhabitants in 1850, The Hague has grown into the third largest city of the Netherlands with almost 500,000 inhabitants. Owing to this late but explosive growth, The Hague has very striking architecture from the 19th th and 20 century. The Hague Convention and Visitors Bureau has From 1900, the well-known architect H.P. Berlage created an interesting walk especially for lovers of (1856-1934) made his mark on the city. His brick architecture. You begin this walk of about two-and- buildings are sober in character; the decorations a-half hours on Hofweg, indicated on the map by a have been made subordinate to the architecture. We advise you to follow the route on the map. After Berlage, the architects of De Stijl and the New Of course, you can always take a break during your Realism strove for taut and functional architecture. walk for a visit to a museum or a nice cup of coffee.
    [Show full text]
  • Guía-8-G2004-.Nl-.De-.Dk-.Se-.No .Pdf
    PAÍSES BAJOS (NEDERLANDS) Breda 3 Rotterdam. 6 ne Delft 19 La Haya (Den Haag) 20 Amsterdam 27 Almere 54 Utrecht 56 Hilversum 60 Arnheim 63 Ede 64 Otterloo 64 Maastricht 65 Eindhoven 67 ALEMANIA (DEUTSCHLAND) Duisburg 71 Essen. 71 de Munster 73 Osnabrück 73 Hannover 74 Wolfsburg 74 Hamburg 75 DINAMARCA (DanmaRK) Copenague (Kovenhavn) 83 Rødrove. 95 dk Aarhus 96 SUECIA (SVERIGE) Malmö 98 Gotemburgo (Göteborg). 99 se Estocolmo (stockholm) 101 NORUEGA (NORGE) Oslo 110 Hamar. 115 no Fjærland 116 Alvdal 116 1 .ne 2 breda La antigua base militar Chassé, situada en el centro de Breda, ha sido recuperada para la ciudad. El plan director trazado por OMA establece una batería de intervenciones, edificios residenciales, edificios públicos, aparcamien- tos, espacios públicos y una serie de funciones adicionales que generan un nuevo paisaje dentro del contexto urbano. El diseño se basa en el modelo de campus universitario, como disparador para generar una vida urbana abierta. Esto se debe a las condiciones particulares del sitio: un espacio vacío en el centro de la compacta ciudad de Breda, pero que también forma parte de un bolsón verde que sirve de recueste a la ciudad y que está definido por tres parques: el parque de Deportes, el parque Wilhemina y el parque Brabant. El espacio verde funciona como unificador de los diversos edificios que se erigen espaciados en el sitio. Además del plan, OMA proyecto uno de los bloques de viviendas y el aparcamiento. Este conjunto se resuelve mediante un borde de manzana macizo, que se conforma a partir del encastre y apilamiento de tres bloques, donde se desarrollan las viviendas y un volumen central vacío.
    [Show full text]
  • Defensie- En Oorlogsschade in Kaart Gebracht (1939-1945)
    Defensie- en oorlogsschade IN KAART GEBRACHT (1939-1945) Elisabeth van Blankenstein MEI 2006/ZEIST In opdracht van het Projectteam Wederopbouw van de Rijksdienst voor de Monumentenzorg 2 Inhoudsopgave Inhoudsopgave 3 Ten geleide 5 Inleiding 7 A. Toelichting gebruikte bronnen 9 B. Voorkomende begrippen en termen 11 Deel 1 13 Algemene overzichten defensie-, oorlogsgeweld- en bezettingschade 1) Woningen 14 2) Boerderijen 18 3) Schadecijfers woningen, boerderijen, bedrijven, kerken, scholen, enzovoort 22 4) Spoorweggebouwen 24 5) Spoor- en verkeersbruggen 25 6) Vaarwegen, sluizen, stuwen en havens 29 7) Molens 31 8) Bossen 33 9) Schade door inundaties 35 10) Schade door Duitse V-wapens 41 11) Schadeoverzichten per gemeente 42 12) Stagnerende woningbouw en huisvestingsproblematiek 1940 - 1945 49 13) Industriële schade door leegroof en verwoesting 50 14) Omvang totale oorlogsschade in guldens 51 Deel 2 53 Alfabetisch overzicht van defensie-, oorlogs en bezettingsschade in provincies, regio’s, steden en dorpen in Nederland Bijlage 1 Chronologisch overzicht van luchtaanvallen op Nederland 1940-1945 219 Colofon 308 3 4 Ten geleide In 2002 werd door het Projectteam Wederopbouw van de Rijksdienst voor de Monumentenzorg (RDMZ) een eerste aanzet gegeven tot een onderzoek naar de oorlogsschade in het buitengebied. Het uiteindelijke doel was het opstellen van een kaart van Nederland met de belangrijkste wederopgebouwde en heringerichte gebieden van Nederland. Belangrijkste (eerste) bron voor het verkennend onderzoek was uiteraard Een geruisloze doorbraak. De ge- schiedenis van architectuur en stedebouw tijdens de bezetting en wederopbouw van Nederland (1995) onder redactie van Koos Bosma en Cor Wagenaar. Tijdens het verkennend onderzoek door stagiaire Suzanne de Laat bleek dat diverse archieven niet bij elkaar aansloten, met betrekking tot oorlogsschade slecht ontsloten waren, verschillende cijfers hanteerden en niet altijd eenduidig waren.
    [Show full text]
  • Fachexkursion Nach Holland / Belgien
    Fachexkursion nach Holland / Belgien Erasmusbrücke, UN Studio, 1996 / De Rotterdam, Rem Koolhaas – OMA, 2013 (Foto: © mihaiulia – fotolia.com) Hauptbahnhof Rotterdam Centraal, Benthem Crouwel Architects / Meyer en Van Schooten Architecten / West 8, 2014 ( Foto: © dglavinova – fotolia.com) Kongresszentrum Mons, Daniel Libeskind, 2015 (Foto: © CCM – Georges De Kinder) .............................................................................................................................................................. Termin: Mittwoch, 15. – Sonntag, 19. Juni 2016 Fachliche Reiseleitung: DI Michael Koller Architect – Urban Planner – Journalist Hooftskade 50, NL – 2526 KA Den Haag www.atelierkoller.com Organisation: Timea Üveges ZIVILTECHNIKER-FORUM für Ausbildung und Berufsförderung Schönaugasse 7, 8010 Graz Veranstalter: Reisebüro und Verkehrsunternehmen P. Springer & Söhne Plüddemanngasse 104, 8042 Graz .............................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................... 1.Tag – Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2016 Graz / Klagenfurt / Wien – Amsterdam Den Haag – Rotterdam Austrian Airlines: 06.00 – 06.35 Uhr Flug Graz – Wien 06.00 – 06.35 Uhr Flug Klagenfurt – Wien 07.20 – 09.15 Uhr Flug Wien – Amsterdam Treffpunkt aller TeilnehmerInnen in der Ankunftshalle Begrüßung durch den fachlichen Reiseleiter Architekt
    [Show full text]
  • ROTTERDAM SPECIAL September 2015 a City Re-Inventing Itself This Publication This Document Was Published in September 2015
    ROTTERDAM SPECIAL September 2015 A city re-inventing itself This publication This document was published in September 2015. The data used in the charts and tables is the latest available at the time of going to press. Sources are included for all the charts. We have used a standard set of notes and abbreviations throughout the document. September 2015 Actions speak louder than words Rotterdam can easily be regarded as the most dynamic city of the Netherlands. It is the only Dutch city with a true skyline. A skyline that will only get denser in CONTENTS the years to come as more and more high-rise buildings are delivered. It is a city where architecture is used to enhance the quality of life and to revive parts of the city which were lagging behind. It is a city where institutional, top-down schemes METROPOLITAN AREA go well together with smaller, local and often private contributions. A city where page 04 the slogan “actions speak louder than words” is central in its thinking. And thus a city that continuously invests in itself, not in order to compete with other cities, but simply because it has to; it is in its DNA. POPULATION Savills hope you will find valuable information in this report. Information which page 06 might make you consider investing in Rotterdam and become part of this dynamic city. ECONOMY page 08 EDUCATION page 10 RESIDENTIAL MARKET page 12 OFFICE MARKET page 14 RETAIL page 16 HOTEL page 18 INVESTORS IN ROTTERDAM page 20 WORLD CITY RANKINGS page 22 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE page 24 savills.com/research 03 Rotterdam Special Metropolitan Area Rotterdam, which has the largest port in Europe, is an international centre of transport and industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban and Cultural Climate of Rotterdam Changed Radically Between 1970 and 2000. Opinions Differ About What the Most Importa
    The urban and cultural climate of Rotterdam changed radically between 1970 and 2000. Opinions differ about what the most important changes were, and when they occurred. Imagine a Metropolis shows that it was first and foremost a new perspective on Rotterdam that stimulated the development of the city during this period. If the Rotterdam of 1970 was still a city with an identity crisis that wanted to be small rather than large and cosy rather than commercial, by 2000 Rotterdam had the image of the most metropolitan of all Dutch cities. Artists and other cultural practitioners – a group these days termed the ‘creative class’ – were the first to advance this metropolitan vision, thereby paving the way for the New Rotterdam that would begin to take concrete shape at the end of the 1980s. Imagine a Metropolis goes on to show that this New Rotterdam is returning to its nineteenth-century identity and the developments of the inter-war years and the period of post-war reconstruction. For Nina and Maria IMAGINE A METROPOLIS ROTTERDAM’S CREATIVE CLASS, 1970-2000 PATRICIA VAN ULZEN 010 Publishers, Rotterdam 2007 This publication was produced in association with Stichting Kunstpublicaties Rotterdam. On February 2, 2007, it was defended as a Ph.D. thesis at the Erasmus University, Rotterdam. The thesis supervisor was Prof. Dr. Marlite Halbertsma. The research and this book were both made possible by the generous support of the Faculty of History and Arts at the Erasmus University Rotterdam, G.Ph. Verhagen-Stichting, Stichting Kunstpublicaties Rotterdam, J.E. Jurriaanse Stichting, Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds Zuid-Holland and the Netherlands Architecture Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The Internal Structure of Cities: Koster, H.R.A. 2013 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Koster, H. R. A. (2013). The Internal Structure of Cities: The Economics of Agglomeration, Amenities and Accessibility. Tinbergen Institute. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 Is the sky the limit? 4 High-rise buildings and office rents * 4.1 Introduction In contemporary cities, skyscrapers are an increasingly common sight in areas where rents are high. Urban economists usually assume that high density buildings are merely the result of a high price for land, which provides an incentive to economise on land and to increase expenditure on building capital (Mills, 1967; Fujita, 1989; Lucas and Rossi-Hansberg, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Hoogbouw in De Ruimte
    Master Thesis Economische Geografie Hoogbouw in de Ruimte Rinse Gorter Augustus 2008 Studentnr: 1300083 Begeleider: Prof. Dr. P.H. Pellenbarg Opleiding: Economische geografie 2 -2- Voorwoord Voor u ligt het onderzoek dat ik gedaan heb ter afronding van de masteropleiding Economische Geografie aan de RijksUniversiteit te Groningen. In een paar zinnen voorafgaande aan het werkelijke onderzoek wil ik graag alle mensen in mijn omgeving bedanken voor hun bijdrage, hulp en steun. In het bijzonder wil ik mijn vader bedanken voor zijn op- en aanmerkingen die mij vaak verder hielpen in het schrijfproces. Daarnaast wil ik Prof. Dr. P.H. Pellenbarg bedanken die mij begeleid heeft bij het schrijven van mijn masterthesis. Verder wil ik Dhr. A. Edzes bedanken voor het vervullen van de taak als tweede begeleider. Natuurlijk zijn ook vrienden en andere familieleden onmisbaar geweest bij het tot stand komen van dit eindproduct. Rinse Gorter, 10 juli 2008 3 -3- Abstract This thesis, written in the finalizing stage of the master’s degree in Economic Geography at the RijksUniversiteit Groningen, is about high-rise buildings in the Netherlands. The title ‘Hoogbouw in de Ruimte’ would literally be translated in English as ‘High-rise buildings in Space’ but (because mankind is still not able to build on the moon) should be read as ‘high- rise buildings and their environment’. High-rise buildings in the Netherlands are starting to play an increased role in Dutch municipal policy. Because of the lack in national high rise building policy, most of the major cities have developed their own policy on skyscrapers. When we look at the history of the skyscraper in the Netherlands, there has been a shift from public development before the 1980’s to private development after 1990.
    [Show full text]