Bidirectional Control of Mrna Translation and Synaptic Plasticity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Germline-Specific Isoform of Eif4e (IFE-1) Is Required for Efficient Translation of Stored Mrnas and Maturation of Both Oocytes and Sperm
Research Article 1529 A germline-specific isoform of eIF4E (IFE-1) is required for efficient translation of stored mRNAs and maturation of both oocytes and sperm Melissa A. Henderson1, Elizabeth Cronland1, Steve Dunkelbarger2, Vince Contreras1, Susan Strome2 and Brett D. Keiper1,* 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA 2Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 26 January 2009 Journal of Cell Science 122, 1529-1539 Published by The Company of Biologists 2009 doi:10.1242/jcs.046771 Summary Fertility and embryonic viability are measures of efficient germ CED-4/Apaf-1, and accumulated as multinucleate cells unable cell growth and development. During oogenesis and to mature to spermatids. A modest defect in oocyte development spermatogenesis, new proteins are required for both mitotic was also observed. Oocytes progressed normally through mitosis expansion and differentiation. Qualitative and quantitative and meiosis, but subsequent production of competent oocytes changes in protein synthesis occur by translational control of became limiting, even in the presence of wild-type sperm. mRNAs, mediated in part by eIF4E, which binds the mRNAs Combined gametogenesis defects decreased worm fertility by 5Ј cap. IFE-1 is one of five eIF4E isoforms identified in 80% at 20°C; ife-1 worms were completely sterile at 25°C. C. elegans. IFE-1 is expressed primarily in the germ line and Thus, IFE-1 plays independent roles in late oogenesis and associates with P granules, large mRNPs that store mRNAs. -
Late Calcium EDTA Rescues Hippocampal CA1 Neurons from Global Ischemia-Induced Death
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 3, 2004 • 24(44):9903–9913 • 9903 Neurobiology of Disease Late Calcium EDTA Rescues Hippocampal CA1 Neurons from Global Ischemia-Induced Death Agata Calderone, Teresa Jover,* Toshihiro Mashiko,* Kyung-min Noh, Hidenobu Tanaka,† Michael V. L. Bennett, and R. Suzanne Zukin Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461 Transient global ischemia induces a delayed rise in intracellular Zn 2ϩ, which may be mediated via glutamate receptor 2 (GluR2)-lacking AMPA receptors (AMPARs), and selective, delayed death of hippocampal CA1 neurons. The molecular mechanisms underlying Zn 2ϩ toxicity in vivo are not well delineated. Here we show the striking finding that intraventricular injection of the high-affinity Zn 2ϩ chelator calcium EDTA (CaEDTA) at 30 min before ischemia (early CaEDTA) or at 48–60 hr (late CaEDTA), but not 3–6 hr, after ischemia, afforded robust protection of CA1 neurons in ϳ50% (late CaEDTA) to 75% (early CaEDTA) of animals. We also show that Zn 2ϩ acts via temporally distinct mechanisms to promote neuronal death. Early CaEDTA attenuated ischemia-induced GluR2 mRNA and protein downregulation (and, by inference, formation of Zn 2ϩ-permeable AMPARs), the delayed rise in Zn 2ϩ, and neuronal death. These findings suggest that Zn 2ϩ acts at step(s) upstream from GluR2 gene downregulation and implicate Zn 2ϩ in transcriptional regulation and/or GluR2 mRNA stability. Early CaEDTA also blocked mitochondrial release of cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases/direct inhibitor of apoptosis protein-binding protein with low pI), caspase-3 activity (but not procaspase-3 cleavage), p75 NTR induction, and DNA fragmentation. -
Department of Neuroscience Faculty Research Interests at the Albert Einstein
Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Faculty Research Interests at the Albert Einstein DOBRENIS EMMONS ESKANDER COEN-CAGLI College of Medicine FISHMAN CHUA FRANCESCONI CASTILLO 2019–2020 FRENETTE BUSCHKE FRICKER GALANOPOULOU BUELOW GONÇALVES BERGMAN HALL BENNETT HÉBERT BATISTA-BRITO JORDAN BALLABH KHODAKHAH AUTRY ASCHNER AREZZO KURSHAN ALPERT AKABAS LACHMAN LAROCCA LEGATT LIPTON MEHLER MOLHOLM MOSHÉ NICOLA PEÑA PEREDA ROSS RUDOLPH SCHWARTZ SECOMBE SHARP SINGER SJULSON SOLDNER SPRAY STEINSCHNEIDER SUADICANI SUSSMAN VERSELIS WALKLEY WILSON YANG ZHENG ZUKIN Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Faculty Research Interests at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine 2019–2020 Myles Akabas, M.D., Ph.D. 1 Peri Kurshan, Ph.D. 68 Joseph C. Arezzo, Ph.D. 6 Herbert M. Lachman, M.D. 70 Michael Aschner, Ph.D. 8 Jorge N. Larocca, Ph.D. 73 Anita E. Autry, Ph.D. 10 Alan D. Legatt, M.D., Ph.D. 75 Praveen Ballabh, M.D. 12 Michael L. Lipton, M.D., Ph.D. 77 Renata Batista-Brito, Ph.D. 14 Mark F. Mehler, M.D. 81 Michael V. L. Bennett, D.Phil. 16 Sophie Molholm, Ph.D. 83 Aviv Bergman, Ph.D. 18 Solomon L. Moshé, M.D. 89 Herman Buschke, M.D. 24 Saleem M. Nicola, Ph.D. 93 Pablo E. Castillo, M.D., Ph.D. 25 José L. Peña, M.D., Ph.D. 96 Streamson C. Chua, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. 27 Alberto E. Pereda, M.D., Ph.D. 98 Ruben Coen-Cagli, Ph.D. 29 Rachel A. Ross, M.D., Ph.D. 100 Kostantin Dobrenis, Ph.D. 31 Stephanie Rudolph, Ph.D. 102 Scott W. -
TLN Agenda-101507
Fall 2007 Janelia Conference: Translation at the Synapse Full Schedule Sunday, October 21st 3:00 pm Check-in 6:00 pm Reception 7:00 pm Dinner 8:00 pm Session 1 (chair - Kevin Moses) 8:00 pm Oswald Steward, University of California, Irvine Mechanisms underlying the selective localization of Arc mRNA at active synapses 8:30 pm James Eberwine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Molecular Biology of the Neuronal Dendrite 9:00 pm Robert Singer, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Following single mRNAs from birth to translation 9:30 pm Erin Schuman, California Institute of Technology/HHMI Visualization of dendritic protein synthesis 10:00 pm Refreshments available at Bob’s pub Fall 2007 Janelia Conference: Translation at the Synapse Monday, October 22nd 7:30 am Breakfast 8:30 am Session 2 (chair - Erin Schuman) 8:30 am Michael Kiebler, Medical University of Vienna The role of Staufen in dendritic RNP transport and dendritic spine morphogenesis 9:00 am Nobutaka Hirokawa, University of Tokyo Intracellular transport of mRNA and kinesin superfamily proteins, KIFs 9:30 am Mark F. Bear, Massachusetts Institute of Technology/HHMI Fragile X syndrome: A disease of synaptic protein synthesis 10:00 am Suzanne Zukin, Albert Einstein College of Medicine AMPA receptor mRNA trafficking in dendrites and synaptic plasticity: dysregulation in Fragile X 10:30 am Break and Group Photo 11:00 am Gary J. Bassell, Emory University School of Medicine Dysregulated mGluR-dependent translation of AMPA receptor and PSD- 95 mRNAs in fragile x syndrome 11:30 am Tom Jongens, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Regulation of the Drosophila Fragile X mental retardation gene by the siRNA pathway 12:00 pm Claudia Bagni, University of Rome Translational control at synapses and mental retardation: new insights into the Fragile X Syndrome 12:30 pm Lunch 1:00 pm Tour 2:00 pm Session 3 (chair - Mark F. -
WCBR Program3
Welcome to the Thirty-Fifth Annual Winter Conference on Brain Research The Winter Conference on Brain Research (WCBR) was founded in 1968 to promote free exchange of information and ideas within neuroscience. It was the intent of the founders that both formal and informal interactions would occur between clinical and laboratory based neuroscientists. During the past thirty years neuroscience has grown and expanded to include many new fields and methodologies. This diversity is also reflected by WCBR participants and in our program. A primary goal of the WCBR is to enable participants to learn about the current status of areas of neuroscience other than their own. Another objective is to provide a vehicle for scientists with common interests to discuss current issues in an informal setting. On the other hand, WCBR is not designed for presentations limited to communicating the latest data to a small group of specialists; this is best done at national society meetings. The program includes panels (reviews for an audience not neces- sarily familiar with the area presented), workshops (informal discussions of current issues and data), and a number of posters. The annual conference lecture will be presented at the Sunday breakfast on Sunday, January 27. Our guest speaker will be Dr. Donald Kennedy, Editor-in-Chief of Science. On Tuesday, January 29, a town meeting will be held for the Aspen/Snowmass commu- nity at which Dr. George Ricaurte, and WCBR participants will discuss drug addiction and toxicity of addictive drugs. Also, participants in the WCBR Outreach Program will present sessions at local schools throughout the week to pique students’ interest in science. -
Direct Effects of Heat Stress During Meiotic Maturation on Bovine Oocyte and Cumulus RNA
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2009 Direct Effects of Heat Stress During Meiotic Maturation on Bovine Oocyte and Cumulus RNA Rebecca R. Payton University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Payton, Rebecca R., "Direct Effects of Heat Stress During Meiotic Maturation on Bovine Oocyte and Cumulus RNA. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2009. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/628 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Rebecca R. Payton entitled "Direct Effects of Heat Stress During Meiotic Maturation on Bovine Oocyte and Cumulus RNA." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Animal Science. J. Lannett Edwards, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Cheryl Kojima, Arnold Saxton, F. Neal Schrick, Neal Stewart Accepted for the Council: Carolyn -
WCBR Program 04
Welcome to the Thirty-Seventh Annual Winter Conference on Brain Research The Winter Conference on Brain Research (WCBR) was founded in 1968 to promote free exchange of information and ideas within neuroscience. It was the intent of the founders that both formal and informal interactions would occur between clinical and laboratory-based neuroscientists. During the past thirty years neuroscience has grown and expanded to include many new fields and methodologies. This diversity is also reflected by WCBR participants and in our program. A primary goal of the WCBR is to enable participants to learn about the current status of areas of neuroscience other than their own. Another objective is to provide a vehicle for scientists with common interests to discuss current issues in an informal setting. On the other hand, WCBR is not designed for presentations limited to communicating the latest data to a small group of specialists; this is best done at national society meetings. The program includes panels (reviews for an audience not neces- sarily familiar with the area presented), workshops (informal discussions of current issues and data), and a number of posters. The annual conference lecture will be presented at the Sunday breakfast on January 25. Our guest speaker will be The Honorable John Edward Porter, former Congressman from Illinois and Chair of the House Appropriations Committee. The title of his talk will be What’s Going on in Washington: We Need to Talk! On Tuesday, January 27, a town meeting will be held for the Copper Mountain community, at which Dr. Michael Zigmond, Director of the Morris K. -
CPEB3 Inhibits Translation of Mrna Targets by Localizing Them to P Bodies
CPEB3 inhibits translation of mRNA targets by localizing them to P bodies Lenzie Forda,b,c,1, Emi Linga,d,1, Eric R. Kandela,b,c,e,2, and Luana Fioritia,f,2 aDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; bMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; cHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815; dDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142; eKavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; and fDulbecco Telethon Institute, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, 20156 Milan, Italy Contributed by Eric R. Kandel, June 28, 2019 (sent for review September 20, 2018; reviewed by Cristina M. Alberini and Sathyanarayanan V. Puthanveettil) Protein synthesis is crucial for the maintenance of long-term of CPEB3. Soluble CPEB3 inhibits target mRNA translation while memory-related synaptic plasticity. The cytoplasmic polyadenyla- oligomeric, partially insoluble CPEB3 promotes the translation of tion element-binding protein 3 (CPEB3) regulates the translation of target mRNA (4). several mRNAs important for long-term synaptic plasticity in the As neurons are polarized structures, we presume that mRNAs hippocampus. In previous studies, we found that the oligomeri- involved in the maintenance of long-term memory will be under zation and activity of CPEB3 are controlled by small ubiquitin-like strict spatial control. Indeed, intracellular transport of mRNA modifier (SUMO)ylation. In the basal state, CPEB3 is SUMOylated; and local translation play a key role in neuronal physiology. it is soluble and acts as a repressor of translation. -
The CPEB3 Ribozyme Modulates Hippocampal-Dependent Memory 3 4 Authors 1 2 2 2† 3 4 5 Claire C
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.426448; this version posted May 5, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 2 The CPEB3 ribozyme modulates hippocampal-dependent memory 3 4 Authors 1 2 2 2† 3 4 5 Claire C. Chen , Joseph Han , Carlene A. Chinn , Xiang Li , Mehran Nikan , Marie Myszka , Liqi 5 2† 2* 1,4,6* 6 Tong , Timothy W. Bredy , Marcelo A. Wood , Andrej Lupták 7 Affiliations 1 8 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, 9 United States. 2 10 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 11 University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. 3 12 Ionis Pharmaceuticals, 2855 Gazelle Court, Carlsbad, CA 92010, USA. 4 13 Department of Chemistry, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. 5 14 Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California–Irvine, 15 Irvine, California 92697, United States. 6 16 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, 17 California 92697, United States 18 *Correspondence to: Andrej Lupták. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of 19 California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. [email protected]. Marcelo A. Wood. 20 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 21 University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. -
Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation Element Binding Protein (CPEB): a Prion-Like Protein As a Regulator of Local Protein Synthesis and Synaptic Plasticity
Luana Fioriti Research Associate Scholar The Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America at Columbia University Weekly Seminar of the Fellows Program April 11th, 2007 Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein (CPEB): a prion-like protein as a regulator of local protein synthesis and synaptic plasticity 1.INTRODUCTION With this paper I would like to describe you what is my research project here at Columbia and how I am trying to address the many questions underlying my project by working everyday in the lab. But before doing this I feel somehow obliged to give you an introduction on the basic concepts of neurobiology. Therefore we will start with a brief definition and description of what is a neuron, how neurons interact to form synapse and neural circuits, how synapse activity can be modified and finally how these changes in synaptic activity underlie high cognitive processes such as learning and memory. After providing you this, I hope not too boring introduction, I will go deeper into the molecular aspects of these phenomenon and I will illustrate you the main goal of my research, which is to characterize the role of a particular protein called Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation Element Binding protein with respect to the morphological and physiological changes that occur at the synapse after neuronal stimulation. Memory In psychology, memory is an organism's ability to store, retain, and subsequently recall information. Although traditional studies of memory began in the realms of philosophy, the late nineteenth and early twentieth century put memory within the paradigms of cognitive psychology. In recent decades, it has become one of the principal pillars of a new branch of science called cognitive neuroscience, a marriage between cognitive psychology and neuroscience. -
The CPEB3 Ribozyme Modulates Hippocampal-Dependent Memory
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.426448; this version posted January 24, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. The CPEB3 ribozyme modulates hippocampal-dependent memory Claire C. Chen1, Joseph Han2, Carlene A. Chinn2, Xiang Li2†, Mehran Nikan3, Marie Myszka4, Liqi Tong5, Timothy W. Bredy2†, Marcelo A. Wood2*, Andrej Lupták1,4,6* 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. 2 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. 3 Ionis Pharmaceuticals, 2855 Gazelle Court, Carlsbad, CA 92010, USA. 4 Department of Chemistry, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. 5 Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California– Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. 6 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States *Correspondence to: Andrej Lupták. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. [email protected]. Marcelo A. Wood. Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States. [email protected]. † Present address: Cognitive Neuroepigenetics Laboratory, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Keywords: ribozyme, splicing, self-scission, polyadenylation, local translation 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.426448; this version posted January 24, 2021. -
RNA-Binding Profiles of Drosophila CPEB Proteins Orb and Orb2
RNA-binding profiles of Drosophila CPEB proteins Orb and Orb2 Barbara Krystyna Stepiena,1,2, Cornelia Oppitza,3, Daniel Gerlacha,3,4, Ugur Dagb, Maria Novatchkovaa, Sebastian Krüttnera,5, Alexander Starka, and Krystyna Kelemana,b,1 aThe Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, 1030 Vienna, Austria; and bHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA 20147 Edited by Eric C. Lai, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10065, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Kathryn V. Anderson September 26, 2016 (received for review March 8, 2016) Localized protein translation is critical in many biological contexts, zinc finger (Znf) region (12). Most CPEB proteins exist in mul- particularly in highly polarized cells, such as neurons, to regulate tiple isoforms (11). Orb2 has two variants, Orb2A and Orb2B (12), gene expression in a spatiotemporal manner. The cytoplasmic which differ in the composition of the N terminus preceding the polyadenylation element-binding (CPEB) family of RNA-binding poly-Q and share a common RBD (12). The poly-Q is required proteins has emerged as a key regulator of mRNA transport and exclusively for LTM, whereas the RBD is required for both de- local translation required for early embryonic development, synap- velopment and LTM (20), and its mutations are lethal (12, 13). tic plasticity, and long-term memory (LTM). Drosophila Orb and Moreover, the RBD of Orb2 can be functionally replaced by the Orb2 are single members of the CPEB1 and CPEB2 subfamilies of RBD of mouse CPEB2 (mCPEB2) but not by that of Orb or the CPEB proteins, respectively. At present, the identity of the mCPEB1, suggesting the conservation of target specificity within mRNA targets they regulate is not fully known, and the binding but not between the CPEB subfamilies, at least in regard to specificity of the CPEB2 subfamily is a matter of debate.