Stories from Bosque Bello the Lives They Led… James Henry Hamilton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stories from Bosque Bello the Lives They Led… James Henry Hamilton Stories from Bosque Bello The lives they led… James Henry Hamilton The hospital ship, USS Solace , served in two wars. In the 1898 Spanish-American War, the ship returned wounded and sick soldiers from Cuba to the U.S. Following the April 6, 1917 U.S. declaration of war on Germany, the hospital ship served again, primarily at ports along the eastern seaboard from Rhode Island to Florida. It was also the ship where young James Henry Hamilton, Mess Attendant, 3 rd Class, United States Naval Reserve, died along with two other sailors on October 4, 1918. The U.S. military experience in World War 1 and the influenza pandemic are closely intertwined. Because of extremely crowded conditions at military facilities and on ships in both the U.S. and on the European battlefields during the height of the American military involvement in the war, the disease spread quickly. In the latter part of 1918 and into 1919, about a fifth of the world's population became infected by the influenza pandemic. It killed an estimated 50 million people. Approximately 675,000 Americans died of influenza during the pandemic. In fact, it killed more people than those that died in actual combat during World War I. About 40% of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard came down with the flu, while around 36% of the Army became sick. Hamilton was a Fernandina resident, son of Charles and Laura, who grew up on Division Street and later lived there with his wife, Pearl. In what would be a life changing decision for Hamilton, on June 1, 1918, at the age of 17, he walked to the Fernandina Navy Recruiting Station and enlisted. At that moment, he joined the ranks of about 380,000 other African-American men, who were either drafted or volunteered for military service. During the period that Hamilton joined up, the U.S. military was segregated. At that point in history, the Navy offered only very limited duty positions on ships for black sailors. Still, Hamilton was eager to join the "Great War" fight even though he wasn't yet of draft age. He probably could have waited the war out, which was slowly winding down, but he didn't; he volunteered. About 20 days after enlisting, he reported to Norfolk, Virginia, where he was assigned to the Fifth Naval District. He was then assigned to duty aboard the nearly 20-year-old battleship, USS Ohio , based in Norfolk and used exclusively for training new ship crews in battleship maneuvers and operations during World War 1. Naval records are unclear if he contracted the flu while with the USS Ohio and was then transferred to the hospital ship as a patient or whether he was reassigned as part of the USS Solace crew, and subsequently came down with the disease. However, just five months after he had entered the Navy to do his part in the "War to End All Wars," the armistice was signed, the conflict was over, and Hamilton, the very young sailor from Fernandina, was dead at 18. .
Recommended publications
  • August 2011 WWW
    THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF PERCH BASE, USSVI, PHOENIX, ARIZONA August 2011 WWW . PERCH - BASE . ORG Volume 17 - Issue 8 THE USSVI CREED GUIDES OUR EFFORTS AS PERCH BASE. SEE PAGE FOUR FOR THE FULL TEXT OF OUR CREED. A BOAT’S UNDERWATER “EYES” Featured Story It’s not a tube with prisms and mirrors any more! Page 11. What Else is “Below Decks” in the MidWatch Article Page Number Title and “What’s Below Decks”..................................................1 Less We Forget - Boats on Eternal Patrol..................................2 USSVI Creed - Our Purpose......................................................3 Perch Base Foundation Supporters...........................................3 Perch Base Offi cers...................................................................4 Sailing Orders (What’s happening with the Base)......................4 From the Wardroom - Base Commander’s Message.................5 Meeting Minutes - July 2011.......................................................5 Chaplain’s Column......................................................................8 “Binnacle List”.............................................................................8 What We’ve Been Up To.............................................................9 August Base Member Birthdays................................................10 What’s New Online....................................................................10 FEATURE: “A Boat’s Underwater Eye’s”......................................11 Lost Boat - USS Cochino (SS-345)..........................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated February 26, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Columbia (SSBN-826) class program is a program to design and build a class of 12 new ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 aging Ohio-class SSBNs. The Navy has identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy wants to procure the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021. Research and development work on the program has been underway for several years, and advance procurement (AP) funding for the first boat began in FY2017. The Navy’s proposed FY2021 budget requests $2,891.5 million in procurement funding, $1,123.2 million in advance procurement (AP) funding, and $397.3 million in research and development funding for the program. The Navy’s FY2021 budget submission estimates the total procurement cost of the 12-ship class at $109.8 billion in then-year dollars. A May 2019 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report assessing selected major DOD weapon acquisition programs stated that the estimated total acquisition (development plus procurement) cost of the Columbia-class program as of June 2018 was $103,035.2 million (about $103.0 billion) in constant FY2019 dollars, including $13,103.0 million (about $13.1 billion) in research and development costs and $89,932.2 million (about $89.9 billion)
    [Show full text]
  • The Panama Canal
    www.PDHcenter.com www.PDHonline.org Table of Contents Slide/s Part Description 1N/ATitle The 2 N/A Table of Contents 3~41 1 A Place of Many Fishes 42~172 2 The French Era Pana 173~372 3 Essayons 373~547 4 Gatun 548~631 5 Making the Cut ma 632~680 6 On to the Pacific 681~722 7 A Path Between the Seas 723~823 8 Strategically & Otherwise 824~853 9 Something Must Be Done Canal 854~900 10 A Canal for the 21st Century A Land Divided, A World1 2 United In1494–twoyearsafterhe set out for the East-Indies by sailing westward, master mariner and navigator Cristobol Colon (a.k.a. Part 1 Christopher Columbus), in service to the Spanish crown, announced his discovery of a “New World.” His four voyages (1492– A Place of Many Fishes 1493, 1493–1496, 1498–1500 and 1502–1504) would open the way for European exploration, exploitation, and colonization. 3 4 “…On September 25, 1513, Vasco Nunez de Balboa “…From where Balboa stood his new ocean lay directly climbed the peaks of the Continental Divide and south, because of the S-shaped twist of the Isthmus…When discovered the Pacific Balboa’s report of his discovery reached Spain, it was Ocean, which he named ‘The accompanied by the recommendation that a canal be South Sea…’” immediately dug across the Isthmus. What the explorer had Popular Mechanics, Dec. 1913 RE: the idea of digging a water in mind was a sea-level canal, for although Leonardo Da passage across the Isthmus of Vinci, the great Italian painter-engineer, had recently invented Panama to connect the Atlantic the hydraulic lock now generally used for lifting vessels over and PifiPacific O/Ocean/s emerged in the early 16th century, when elevations, it had not become widely known.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Board and the Panama Canal 1903-1919:Unfulfilled Hope
    RECALL USS Missouri and USS Ohio in the lower chambers of Miraflores Locks of the Panama Canal, 1915 Download as wallpaper at ndupress.ndu.edu Unfulfilled Hope Naval Historical Center The Joint Board and the Panama Canal, 1903–1919 By JASON R. GODIN t is a fundamental principle,” the documents outlined a new “joint plan an effort to avoid the inter-Service rivalry wrote Acting Secretary of the Navy making body” composed of representa- displayed at the Santiago campaign in Cuba Franklin Roosevelt to Secretary tives from the State Department, Army during the 1898 Spanish-American War, I of State Robert Lansing on May General Staff, and Navy General Board. Secretary of War Elihu Root and Secretary 1, 1919, “that the foreign policy of our In the end, however, the civilian Service of the Navy William Moody created in July Government is in the hands of the State secretaries never translated the inter- 1903 an inter-Service body called the Joint Department. It is also an accepted agency plan into institutional practice. Army and Navy Board “for the purpose of fact that the foreign policy of a govern- The Secretary of State failed to acknowl- conferring upon, discussing, and reaching ment depends for its acceptance by other edge the memorandum, appearing never common conclusions regarding all matters nations upon the naval and military force to have opened it. calling for the cooperation of the two Ser- that is behind it.”1 In an effort to add Ironically, Secretary Lansing’s inaction vices.”2 More commonly called the Joint military muscle to civilian diplomacy, the proved the culmination of an unfulfilled Board, its creation marked the first formal future President submitted with his mem- hope that was born over 15 years before.
    [Show full text]
  • USS Ohio (BB-12) Being Launched at the Union Iron Works, San Francisco, Calif., 18 May 1901
    USS Ohio (BB-12) being launched at the Union Iron Works, San Francisco, Calif., 18 May 1901. USS Ohio was a Maine-class Battleship 65 66 67 Drydocked at Hunter's Point, San Francisco, California, on 19 July 1904. 68 Picture postcard, USS Ohio (BB-12) USS Ohio (BB-12) pictured at Mare Island shortly after being commissioned, 4 October 1904. Picture postcard, USS Ohio (BB-12) 69 The Ohio (BB-12) all dressed up for the Empress of China while with the "Great White Fleet" in November 1908. Picture postcard, USS Ohio (BB-12) 70 Picture postcard of Ohio (BB-12) underway. 71 12"/40 guns of the ship's forward gun turret, photographed circa 1907- 1908. Note Sailors strolling on deck; bell mounted on the pilothouse face; and 3-pounder guns mounted on the superstructure. Postcard with USS Ohio ship cancel, 1909 72 The 12"/40 guns of the Ohio's (BB-12) forward turret, photographed circa 1907-1908. This view may have been taken during the "Great White Fleet" World cruise. 73 "Cleaning the big guns". Crew members polishing the muzzles and tompions of the forward turret 12"/40 guns on the USS Ohio (BB-12), circa 1907-1908. This view may have been taken during the "Great White Fleet" World cruise. 74 Ohio (BB-12), California (ACR-6) and South Dakota (ACR-9) between May 1908 and July 1908 at Mare Island Navy Yard while assigned to the "Great White Fleet". The cruisers are moored next to the yard's coal sheds. This picture shows the coal handling equipment installed by the Brown Hoisting Machinery Company in 1904 seen above the coal sheds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jerseyman
    3rdQuarter “Rest well, yet sleep lightly and hear the call, if 2006 again sounded, to provide firepower for freedom…” THE JERSEYMAN END OF AN ERA… BATTLESHIPS USS MAINE USS TEXAS US S NO USS INDIANA RTH U DAK USS MASSACHUSETTS SS F OTA LORI U DA USS OREGON SS U TAH IOWA U USS SS W YOM USS KEARSARGE U ING SS A S KENTUCKY RKAN US USS SAS NEW USS ILLINOIS YOR USS K TEXA USS ALABAMA US S S NE USS WISCONSIN U VAD SS O A KLAH USS MAINE USS OMA PENN URI SYLV USS MISSO USS ANIA ARIZ USS OHIO USS ONA NEW U MEX USS VIRGINIA SS MI ICO SSI USS NEBRASKA SSIP USS PI IDAH USS GEORGIA USS O TENN SEY US ESS USS NEW JER S CA EE LIFO USS RHODE ISLAND USS RNIA COL ORAD USS CONNECTICUT USS O MARY USS LOUISIANA USS LAND WES USS T VI USS VERMONT U NORT RGIN SS H CA IA SS KANSAS WAS ROLI U USS HING NA SOUT TON USS MINNESOTA US H D S IN AKOT DIAN A USS MISSISSIPPI USS A MASS USS IDAHO US ACH S AL USET ABAMA TS USS NEW HAMPSHIRE USS IOW USS SOUTH CAROLINA USS A NEW U JER USS MICHIGAN SS MI SEY SSO USS DELAWARE USS URI WIS CONS IN 2 THE JERSEYMAN FROM THE EDITOR... Below, Archives Manager Bob Walters described for us two recent donations for the Battleship New Jersey Museum and Memorial. The ship did not previously have either one of these, and Bob has asked us to pass this on to our Jerseyman readers: “Please keep the artifact donations coming.
    [Show full text]
  • Rickover and the Nuclear Navy Rickover and the Nuclear Navy
    The Preface on pages xvii-xix has been altered to correct a typesetting error in the printed book. All of the text is unchanged, but sections of the text have been rearranged to place paragraphs in the proper order. Rickover and the Nuclear Navy Rickover and the Nuclear Navy THE DISCIPLINE OF TECHNOLOGY by Francis Duncan Naval Institute Press Annapolis, Maryland Published 1989 by the United States Naval Institute Annapolis, Maryland Copyright © 1989 on the foreword All rights reserved. Prepared by the Department of Energy; work made for hire. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Duncan, Francis, 1922- Rickover and the nuclear navy : the discipline of technology / by Francis Duncan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-87021-236-2 1. Rickover, Hyman George. 2. Nuclear submarines—United States— History. 3. Admirals—United States—Biography 4. United States. Navy—Biography. I. Title. V63.R54D86 1989 359.3'2574'0973—dc20 89-39097 CIP This edition is authorized for sale only in the United States, its territories and possessions, and Canada. Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 First printing Contents Foreword vii Preface xvii Acknowledgments xxv 1. Common Denominators 1 2. Submarines 17 3. Thresher 52 4. Surface Ships—First Battles 99 5. Surface Ships—The Alliance with Congress 115 6. Surface Ships—Legislating Nuclear Power into the Fleet 147 7. Technology and Diplomacy: The Multilateral Force 170 8. Shippingport 190 9. The Devil Is in the Details 232 10. Independence and Control 252 11. Discipline of Technology 279 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • John T. Scott Photograph Collection, 1856-1923
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8qc04xk No online items A guide to the John T. Scott photograph collection, 1856-1923 Processed by: L. Bianchi and Amy Croft, February 2013. San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-7030 Fax: 415-556-3540 [email protected] URL: http://www.nps.gov/safr 2013 A guide to the John T. Scott P79-072a (SAFR 23362) 1 photograph collection, 1856-1923 A Guide to the John T. Scott photograph collection P79-072a San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, National Park Service 2013, National Park Service Title: John T. Scott photograph collection Date: 1856-1923 Date (bulk): 1890-1905 Identifier/Call Number: P79-072a (SAFR 23362) Creator: Scott, John T. Physical Description: 795 items. Repository: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, Historic Documents Department Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Abstract: The John T. Scott photograph collection, 1856-1923, bulk 1890-1905 (SAFR 23362, P79-072a) is comprised of a photograph album and loose photographic prints primarily relating to the Union Iron Works of San Francisco, California. The photographs show various vessels and pieces of machinery built by the company. The collection has been processed to the File Unit level, with some Items listed, and is open for use. Physical Location: San Francisco Maritime NHP, Historic Documents Department Language(s): In English. Access This collection is open for use unless otherwise noted. Publication and Use Rights Some material may be copyrighted or restricted. It is the researcher's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other case restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in the collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Asians and Pacific Islanders in the Civil War March 2015 Note: This Is a Working Document
    Asians and Pacific Islanders in the Civil War March 2015 Note: This is a working document. The names noted in bold designate soldiers and sailors whose service has been confirmed and corroborated by various sources. The names not listed in bold are strong leads that require continued investigation to definitively confirm their service and ethnicity. This may be the largest repository of API servicemen in existence, but it is not comprehensive. There are likely more servicemen who have been discovered by other researchers, and still others whose stories have yet to be recovered. Information on Servicemen Tannroi Acoaw, born Canton, China; enlisted August 14, 1862, aged 23, at New Orleans, for three years; personal details at the time of enlistment shown as black eyes, black hair and dark complexion; previous occupation, cook; served as officers’ cook on the USS Pinola. [Muster Roll.] Pedro Acow (surname also shown as Accao), born Canton, China, about 1834; previous occupation, labourer; enlisted as private in company K, 2nd Louisiana (United States) Infantry, at the age of 28, at New Orleans, on September 30, 1862; personal details at the time of enlistment shown as black hair, gray eyes, dark complexion, and standing at 5 feet 6 inches tall; deserted at Algiers City, April 14, 1863; enlisted and mustered about the same time as fellow Chinese born soldiers, John Francis and John Hussey. [Compiled Military Service Record at FOLD3.com.] John Adams, Ward Room Cook, USS Antona, aged 44, resident of Massachusetts, enlisted November 18, 1864, for 3 years, at New Orleans. Born Hindostan [India]. (Muster Roll.) Pedro Aelio (? - surname on register is actually quite illegible), Landsman, aged 29, occupation Cook, enlisted March 15, 1865, for 2 years, at New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Edit Smaller
    PB 1 ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM SPONSORS DIAMOND General Dynamics Electric Boat Lockheed Martin Newport News Shipbuilding a Division of Huntington Ingalls Industries PLATINUM General Dynamics Mission Systems L3Harris Technologies Northrop Grumman Raytheon Technologies GOLD BWX Technologies Leonardo DRS Teledyne Brown SILVER Carahsoft HDR Oceaneering International Sheffield Forgemasters Sonalysts Systems Planning and Analysis The Boeing Company VACCO 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS MONDAY AGENDA ......................................................................................................................................................5 TUESDAY AGENDA .....................................................................................................................................................6 WEDNESDAY AGENDA ................................................................................................................................................7 SPEAKERS RDML Edward Anderson, USN .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 FORCM(SS) Steve Bosco, USN ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Hon. Kenneth Braithwaite ...................................................................................................................................................................... 10 ADM Frank Caldwell,
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Nuclear Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN)
    SECRET SECRET SECRET (U) Results in Brief (U) Evaluation of Nuclear Ballistic Missile Submarine Sustainment June 15, 2018 (U) Background (cont’d) (U) Objective • (U) Incremental Refit. This 35-day maintenance (U) Our objective was to determine whether the Navy can period consists of scheduled repairs, maintenance, sustain the current Ohio-class Nuclear Ballistic Missile and inspections, as well as unscheduled repairs Submarines (SSBNs) until the replacement Columbia-class and minor modernization tasks such as sonar, SSBNs are fielded. torpedo fire control, and navigation systems. • (U) Extended Refit Period. This 7- to 8-month (U) Background maintenance period replaces and refurbishes the (U) The United States maintains a nuclear triad consisting major components of the hull and internal of manned bombers, land-based intercontinental ballistic systems. missiles, and ballistic missile submarines capable of • (U) Engineered Refueling Overhaul (ERO). This delivering nuclear weapons. Our review focused on Ohio- 27-month overhaul occurs around the 20-year class SSBN sustainment. point for the Ohio-class SSBN and includes (S) extensive inspections, structural repairs, and a nuclear reactor refueling to extend the submarines service life. (U) Finding (U) The Navy decided in 1998 to extend the original 30- (U) The Navy has taken action to sustain the Ohio-class year service life of the Ohio-class to 42 years. The first SSBNs at the minimum USSTRATCOM requirements until Ohio-class SSBN is scheduled to be retired in 2027; the the replacement Columbia-class SSBNs are fielded. remaining 13 are scheduled to be retired one per year (U) In order to maintain USSTRATCOM requirements, the until 2040.
    [Show full text]