IG XII 9.212: a MACEDONIAN OFFICER at ERETRIA Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 96 (1993) 249–257

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IG XII 9.212: a MACEDONIAN OFFICER at ERETRIA Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 96 (1993) 249–257 RICHARD A. BILLOWS IG XII 9.212: A MACEDONIAN OFFICER AT ERETRIA aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 96 (1993) 249–257 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 249 IG XII 9.212: A Macedonian Officer at Eretria IG XII 9.212 is a decree of the city of Eretria on Euboia, honoring a Macedonian officer named Arrhidaios son of Alexandros as a public benefactor. It was first published by A. Wil- helm in "Epigraphai ex Euboias", EA 1892, 126-33 no. 3, with a facsimile and commentary. The text given by Ziebarth in IG XII 9 differs slightly from that of Wilhelm in the reconstruc- tions proposed for lines 10-13, but is otherwise that of Wilhelm as Ziebarth never saw the in- scription itself. Wilhelm concluded from the letter forms that the inscription probably dated from the first half of the 3rd century BC. In the opening lines of the decree mention is made of a basileus Alexandros, whom Wilhelm sought to identify in order to date the inscription more closely. He noted two rulers named Alexandros in the first half of the 3rd century: the son of the famous king Pyrrhos of Epeiros, whom it would be difficult, however, to associate with Eretria; and the less well known Alexandros Kraterou, nephew and viceroy over Greece of the famous Macedonian king Antigonos Gonatas. This latter Alexandros ca. 250 rebelled against his uncle and made himself an independent ruler in central Greece, and he is in fact mentioned in the Suda s.v. Euphorion as ÉAlejãndrou toË ba!ileÊ!anto! EÈbo¤a!, ufloË d¢ KrateroË. As he is thus specifically associated with Euboia, Wilhelm tentatively identi- fied him as the king Alexandros of the Eretrian decree, which he consequently dated to ca. 250.1 This assumption of Wilhelm's has found universal assent; as far as I have been able to discover only one scholar, R. Urban, has expressed any reservations, though Wilhelm him- self proposed his theory with a certain diffidence.2 In point of fact IG XII 9.212 has been largely ignored by modern scholars, the only dis- cussion of any length devoted to it being that of O. Picard in his book cited in n. 1 at pp. 272- 74. There are, however, serious problems with the interpretation of it proposed by Wilhelm and Picard, which merit more careful examination than they have yet received. At lines 10-13 the text, though somewhat broken, certainly praises Arrhidaios for helping the Greeks to ex- pel garrisons from their cities. Picard concludes from this that Alexandros Kraterou, Arrhi- daios' putative master, had a policy of removing the Macedonian garrisons of his uncle Anti- 1 See further Wilhelm RE s.v. Alexandros no. 15; O. Picard, Chalkis et la confédération eubéenne (BEFAR 234, 1979) 272-74. The date of his rebellion is disputed and cannot be gone into here; his death oc- curred about 245—see Plutarch, Aratos 17.1-18.1 recounting how Antigonos recaptured Korinthos after reput- edly having Alexandros poisoned. 2 R. Urban, Wachstum und Krise des Achaiischen Bundes (Historia Einzelschriften 35, Wiesbaden 1979) 22 n. 87 remarks that the attribution to Alexandros Kraterou cannot be regarded as proven. The attribution is accepted without comment by e.g. W.S. Ferguson, Hellenistic Athens (London 1911); W.W. Tarn, Antigonos Gonatas (Oxford 1914) 355 n. 35; and Ed. Will, Histoire politique du monde hellénistique I (Nancy 1966) 286- 87. Wilhelm himself stated that Alexandros was the king of this inscription "katå tØn gn≈mhn mou" (EA 1892 p. 131), and in his RE article he drew conclusions from IG XII 9.212 with the caution "wenn dieselbe richtig auf diesen Alexandros [sc. Kraterou] bezogen wird." 250 Richard A. Billows gonos from the Greek cities, renewing in this the propaganda about liberating the Greeks spread by his step-grandfather (and Antigonos Gonatas' father) Demetrios Poliorketes.3 Con- sideration of the nature of Alexandros' power and position, however, renders such a conclu- sion highly suspect. Alexandros had been placed by Antigonos in command of the Macedonian garrisons in Greece, especially at Chalkis, Korinthos, and perhaps Athens, the three main bastions of An- tigonos' power in Greece. We may ask ourselves how he went about rebelling against Anti- gonos, and on what he thereafter based his own power as ruler: the Macedonian garrisons could not simply be told to go away without some counterforce to back up the command, and with the garrisons gone Alexandros' power would have been gone too without some other force to rely upon. We know in fact that Alexandros, as independent ruler, had military forces and engaged in warfare and the garrisoning of Greek cities: warfare is attested against the Macedonian garrison at Athens, which remained loyal to Antigonos, and it is certain that Alexandros maintained a garrison in Korinthos.4 We may be sure, in fact, that far from ex- pelling the Macedonian garrisons of Chalkis and Korinthos, a proceeding which would have been difficult and dangerous if not impossible, Alexandros based his own power upon these very garrison troops, whom he merely seduced from their loyalty to Antigonos; in short that Alexandros' rebellion from Antigonos simply involved refusing to accept or follow orders from Antigonos and in future ruling his cities and garrisons in his own interest. The other in- formation we possess about Alexandros shows him to have been very far from the sort of ruler to be making propaganda about Greek liberty and freedom from garrisons (see n. 4 above). The difficulties justify a fresh look at the inscription, its date, the identify of king Alexander, and the historical and political background. I. The Inscription (see pl. VII) The height of the stele is 64 cm., and the inscribed text of 26 lines covers roughly the top three quarters of the surface. The surface of the stone is in a very poor condition: badly battered at the edges and worn as well as chipped in the centre, where much of the text is lost. This was already the case in Wilhelm's day, but the 3 Demetrios Poliorketes married Phila, the widow of Alexander's famous general Krateros (Plut. Dem. 14.2). Phila was the mother of Krateros by Krateros, and of Antigonos Gonatas by Demetrios (see Plut. Moralia 486a where Krateros jr. and Antigonos Gonatas are cited as a case of devoted brothers; cf. R.A. Billows, Antigonos the One-Eyed and the Creation of the Hellenistic State (Berkeley 1990) app. 3 nos. 10 and 60). Alexandros was thus the half-nephew of Gonatas, and the step-grandson of Poliorketes. 4 That Alexandros Kraterou maintained a garrison on Akrokorinthos appears from Plutarch, Aratos 17.1- 18.2, which describes how Antigonos Gonatas captured this garrison by surprise shortly after Alexandros' death; that he had a garrison at Chalkis is not specifically attested, but may be regarded as virtually certain, for Chalkis appears to have been, as it were, his second capital (cf. the anecdote preserved by the Suda s.v. Eupho- rion), and it is not clear how else he could have maintained his power there in the face of the perennial Greek preference for freedom. In addition, it appears that Alexandros installed a man named Nikokles as tyrant of Sikyon, which led to bad blood between himself and Aratos, who managed to depose Nikokles (see on this Will, Histoire politique I 288-90; and cf. Plut., Aratos 18.2 mentioning an attack on Korinthos by Aratos when Alexandros was still in charge there). Though Alexandros did later have an alliance with the Achaian League (Plut. ibid.), there is no evidence to suggest that he was regarded as a champion of Greek freedom, or that he led an alliance of "the Greeks" (he was in fact at war with Athens and Argos; see IG II2 774 and 1225). IG XII 9.212: A Macedonian Officer at Eretria 251 stone has deteriorated further since then, and some of the letters read by Wilhelm are no longer visible (these are underlined in the text below). The first three lines, which are entirely preserved and have 30, 27 and 28 let- ters respectively, indicate ca. 30 as the number of letters per line. However, the writing is uneven and untidy, the letter-size and spacing varying quite widely; in places the writing went right up to the very right edge of the stone as the cutter sought either to avoid having to break up a word, or at least to break it syllabically; and in the latter portions of the inscription the lines are somewhat longer as the stone widens slightly towards the bottom (it is ca. 28.5 cm. wide just above the first line of text, and 30 cm. wide just below the last line). In addition, the letters tend overall to be slightly smaller in the latter part of the inscription. Consequently, there is quite a wide variation in the number of letters per line (between 27 and 34). After each line I give in paren- theses the number of letters in it. The stone is stored in the Eretria Museum with the inventory n. 1152, as I learned from Professor Denis Knoepfler of the Université de Neuchatel. Thanks to the kind co-operation of the Chalkis Ephoreia of the Greek Archaeological Service, and of the guards of the Eretria Museum, I was able to inspect the inscription in 1983 and again in 1987, when I was also able to photograph it.5 My inspection confirmed most of Wilhelm's readings, at least wherever the letters still survive, except at one crucial point at the end of line 6, where Wil- helm overlooked the worn and partially destroyed last letter of the line.
Recommended publications
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts
    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing the Dog: Naturalistic Canine Representations from Greek Art
    arts Article Seeing the Dog: Naturalistic Canine Representations from Greek Art Kenneth F. Kitchell Department of Classics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA; [email protected] Received: 13 November 2019; Accepted: 10 January 2020; Published: 30 January 2020 Abstract: This study attempts to demonstrate that ancient Greek authors and vase painters (mostly of the late sixth and early fifth centuries) were well attuned to the many bodily gestures and positions exhibited by dogs in real life and utilized this knowledge in producing their works. Once this is clear, it becomes evident that the Greek public at large was equally aware of such canine bodily gestures and positions. This extends the seminal work on gestures of Boegehold and Lateiner to the animal world and seeks also to serve as a call for further study of similar animals throughout ancient Greek times. Keywords: animal studies; dogs in antiquity; animals in antiquity; Greek vases; body language Despite the recent increased interest in animal studies, the dedicated work of scholars such as Liliane Bodson, and the publication of several handbooks and guides to animals in Greco-Roman antiquity, there are still significant gaps in our knowledge of the role of animals in material culture.1 As Harden(2014, p. 24) recently pointed out, Animals frequently go unrecorded in publications and museum captions ::: [and] rarely are individual species indexed in publications ::: The art of the ancient Mediterranean is replete with images of animals, and much Classical art features animals prominently, but there are very few modern scholarly works that seek to analyze the semiotics of the depicted animal.2 Until the recent increase in ancient animal studies, animals remained in the background, both literally and figuratively.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Practices in Ancient Macedonia from the Neolithic to the Roman Period
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Hellenic University: IHU Open Access Repository Agricultural practices in ancient Macedonia from the Neolithic to the Roman period Evangelos Kamanatzis SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) in Black Sea and Eastern Mediterranean Studies January 2018 Thessaloniki – Greece Student Name: Evangelos Kamanatzis SID: 2201150001 Supervisor: Prof. Manolis Manoledakis I hereby declare that the work submitted is mine and that where I have made use of another’s work, I have attributed the source(s) according to the Regulations set in the Student’s Handbook. January 2018 Thessaloniki - Greece Abstract This dissertation was written as part of the MA in Black Sea and Eastern Mediterranean Studies at the International Hellenic University. The aim of this dissertation is to collect as much information as possible on agricultural practices in Macedonia from prehistory to Roman times and examine them within their social and cultural context. Chapter 1 will offer a general introduction to the aims and methodology of this thesis. This chapter will also provide information on the geography, climate and natural resources of ancient Macedonia from prehistoric times. We will them continue with a concise social and cultural history of Macedonia from prehistory to the Roman conquest. This is important in order to achieve a good understanding of all these social and cultural processes that are directly or indirectly related with the exploitation of land and agriculture in Macedonia through time. In chapter 2, we are going to look briefly into the origins of agriculture in Macedonia and then explore the most important types of agricultural products (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Boeotia Archaeological Project Is a Synergasia of The
    EBAP 2007 Report to Teiresias The Eastern Boeotia Archaeological Project is a synergasia of the Canadian Institute in Greece (Brendan Burke, University of Victoria, Bryan Burns, University of Southern California, and Susan Lupack, University College London) and Vassilis Aravantinos (Director of the Thebes Museum and the 9th Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities). The long-term goals of the Eastern Boeotia Archaeological Project (EBAP) are to document and interpret the evidence for the land use, settlement patterns and burial practices resulting from the human occupation of eastern Boeotia over an extended chronological period. We have located our study specifically on the plains surrounding the modern villages of Arma, Eleon, and Tanagra, which are bounded by the heights of Mount Teumessos and the Soros range along the south and the Ipatos Mountains on the north, partially because of the intrinsically interesting sites they contain (Eleon and Tanagra) and partially because this area connected the Boeotian center of Thebes to the eastern sea and was therefore a major route for external contact, Our primary research interests focus on developments during the Late Bronze Age, for which evidence in the region is clearly present, yet our methods of study include a broader analysis of the region's long-term history. We are therefore pursuing documentation and study of all periods. Our initial field work in June 2007 proved very successful in terms of locating, collecting, and analyzing surface material which we found to represent activity from the Neolithic through early modern periods. In 2008 we plan to expand our collection zones, refine our interpretation of the ceramic evidence, continue mapping architectural features on the acropolis of Eleon and elsewhere, and to document the funerary landscapes of both Tanagra and Eleon.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandrine Huber, Eretria XIV. L'aire Sacrificielle Au Nord Du Sanctuaire D
    Sandrine Huber, Eretria XIV. L’Aire sacrificielle au nord du Sanctuaire d’Apollon Daphnéphoros. Un rituel des époques géométrique et archaïque, avec une contribution de Isabelle Chenal-Velarde et Jaqueline Studer, Gollion 2003. 189 + 72 p. 4 tables, 142 plates. In 1978 to 1981, the Swiss archaeological school resumed excavations at the sanctuary of Apollo Daphnephoros at Eretria to explore the northern and eastern limits of the sanctuary, with additional investigations undertaken in 1990. To the north of the temple of the god the excavations revealed an area of cult, l’Aire sacrificielle Nord, with an immensely rich votive deposit, consisting of several thousand miniature hydrias and other ceramic vessels, as well as objects from Italy, the Syro-Phoenician sphere and Luristan. The deposit also contained a large number of animal bones. The results of these investigations are published and analysed by Sandrine Huber in two excellent volumes of text and images. This study greatly enriches our knowledge not only of Geometric-Archaic Eretria, but also of Greek religion at large, as it consists of the earliest cult attested in an urban sanctuary in the Greek world. The Introduction (p. 19-25) sets out the aims of the study: to place the Aire sacrificielle Nord within its larger context, and to try to determine its function, the rituals performed at the site, the identity of both the divinity and the worshippers, and its relation to the area dedicated to Apollo Daphnephoros. The sacrificial area was located on the northern bank of a small seasonal stream, facing the sanctuary of Apollo.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Th a F a I G E Art of Ancient Greece (Iron Age)
    Chapter 5 The Art of A nci ent G reece (Iron Age) Famous Greeks: Playwriters: Aeschylus (“father of Greek tragedy”), Sophocles (Antigone, Oedipus), Euripides, Aristophanes (Comedies. Lysistrata) Philosophers: Heraclitus (“You can never step into the same river twice”) Plato,,, Socrates, Aristotles Mathematicians and scientists: Archimedes, Pythagoras, Aristotles, Euclid Authors and poets: Homer (Odyssey and Iliad), Sappho of Lesbos, Aesop Historians: Herodotus ("The Father of History,"). Thucydides The Greek World GtiPid(9Geometric Period (9-8th c. BCE) Early Geometric Krater. C. 800 BCE Krater A bowl for mixing wine and water Greek key or Meander An ornament consisting of interlocking geometric motifs. An ornamental pattern of contiguous straight lines joined usually at right angles. Geometric krater, from the Dipylon cemetery, Athens, Greece, ca. 740 BCE. Approx. 3’ 4 1/2” high. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Geometric krater, from the Dipylon cemetery. Detail. Hero and Centaur (Herakles and Nessos? Achilles and Chiron?) ca. 750–730 BCE. Bron ze, a pprox. 4 1/2” high. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Geometric krater, from the Dipylon cemetery, Athens, Greece, ca. 740 BCE. Approx. 3’ 4 1/2” high. Hero and Centaur (Herakles and Nessos? Achilles and Chiron?) ca. 750–730 BCE. Bronze, approx. 4 1/2” high. Greek Vase Painting Orientalizing Period (7th c. BCE) Pitcher (olpe) Corinth, c. 600 BCE Ceramic with black-figure decoration, height 11½ " British Mus . London Rosette: A round or oval ornament resembling a rose Comppyarison: Assyrian.. Lamassu, ca. 720–705 BCE. Pitcher (olpe) Corinth, c. 600 BCE Ceramic with black-figure decoration, height 11½" British Mus.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International
    ANCIENT EUBOEA: STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF A GREEK ISLAND FROM EARLIEST TIMES TO 404 B.C. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Vedder, Richard Glen, 1950- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 05:15:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/290465 INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: a Socio-Cultural Perspective
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective Nicholas D. Cross The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1479 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INTERSTATE ALLIANCES IN THE FOURTH-CENTURY BCE GREEK WORLD: A SOCIO-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE by Nicholas D. Cross A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 Nicholas D. Cross All Rights Reserved ii Interstate Alliances in the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________ __________________________________________ Date Jennifer Roberts Chair of Examining Committee ______________ __________________________________________ Date Helena Rosenblatt Executive Officer Supervisory Committee Joel Allen Liv Yarrow THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross Adviser: Professor Jennifer Roberts This dissertation offers a reassessment of interstate alliances (συµµαχία) in the fourth-century BCE Greek world from a socio-cultural perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Eretrian Ceramic Production Through Time: Geometric to Hellenistic Periods ⁎ X
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep Eretrian ceramic production through time: Geometric to Hellenistic periods ⁎ X. Charalambidoua,b, , E. Kiriatzia, N.S. Müllera, S. Müller Celkab,c, S. Verdanb, S. Huberb,d, K. Gexb, G. Ackermannb, M. Palaczykb, P. Maillardb a Fitch Laboratory, British School at Athens, 52 Souedias Street, 10676 Athens, Greece b Swiss School of Archaeology in Greece, Skaramanga 4B, 10433 Athens, Greece c CNRS, UMR 5133-Archéorient/Lyon 2 University, France d Université de Lorraine, EA 1132 Hiscant-MA, Campus Lettres et Sciences humaines, Nancy, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Eretria, in the centre of the Aegean (Greece), has been the focus of an interdisciplinary programme that combines Eretria macroscopic, petrographic and elemental analysis in a diachronic investigation of pottery production and supply Euboea on the site from the early third millennium (Early Bronze Age) to the end of the first millennium BCE (Hellenistic Central Aegean period). This paper reviews the preliminary results of the analyses of the pottery of historical times, mainly from Geometric to Hellenistic periods the Geometric to the Hellenistic periods (phase II of the Eretria pottery project). It presents the compositional Local production and technological characteristics of the local fabrics and offers examples of how continuity and innovation Thin section petrography ff ff Elemental analysis characterise di erent aspects of Eretria's pottery production. In addition, di erent categories of imported vessels that arrived in Eretria are investigated in order to recognize the origin of these specific products.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of Greek Cities in the First Millennium BC
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The growth of Greek cities in the first millennium BC Version 1.0 December 2005 Ian Morris Stanford University Abstract: In this paper I trace the growth of the largest Greek cities from perhaps 1,000- 2,000 people at the beginning of the first millennium BC to 400,000-500,000 at the millennium’s end. I examine two frameworks for understanding this growth: Roland Fletcher’s discussion of the interaction and communication limits to growth and Max Weber’s ideal types of cities’ economic functions. I argue that while political power was never the only engine of urban growth in classical antiquity, it was always the most important motor. The size of the largest Greek cities was a function of the population they controlled, mechanisms of tax and rent, and transportation technology. © Ian Morris. [email protected] 1 The growth of Greek cities in the first millennium BC Ian Morris (Stanford) 1. Introduction Greece in 1000 BC was a world of villages. Most people lived in communities of just a few dozen souls; even the largest settlement, Athens (Figure 1), was probably just 3,000 to 4,000 strong. But at the millennium’s end, the Greek east Mediterranean boasted some of the largest cities in pre-industrial history. Alexandria, Antioch, and Seleucia-on-the- Tigris probably each had 250,000-500,000 inhabitants. Figure 1. Sites in the Aegean mentioned in this chapter In this chapter I discuss the size of Greek cities and the implications of their growth. I identify three major transitions: 2 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]