Refuting the Oppression, Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Refuting the Oppression, Page 1 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM ﻢﺴﺑ ﷲ ﻦﻤﺣﺮﻟا ﻢﯿﺣﺮﻟا Refuting the Oppression, Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) Part One Re: “Muhammad Ibn Hadi’s Allegations and the Response of the Major Scholars in Light of the Manhaj of the Salaf” by Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid on the 24th of September 2018. Allah the Most High says, “Verily, Allah does not set right the work of Al-Mufsidun (the evil-doers, corrupts, etc.).” (10:81). Allah the Exalted says, “And, verily! Allah guides not the plot of the betrayers.” (12:52). Allah the Mighty and Majestic says, “And verily, this is my Straight Path, so follow it, and follow not (other) paths, for they will separate you away from His Path. This He has ordained for you that you may become Al-Muttaqun.” (6:153). Refuting the Oppression, Page 2 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM Allah The Most High says, “And follow not your desire for it will mislead you from the Path of Allah.” (38:26) Al-Hudhayfah bin al-Yamaan - may Allah be pleased with him - said, "Know that misguidance, true misguidance is that you acknowledge what you used to reject and you reject what you used to acknowledge. And beware of changing colours in the religion, for indeed the Deen of Allah is only one." (Al- Ibaanah Al-Kubra, 1/89). To proceed: Recently Abu Khadeejah – who is a toddler in comparison to Al-Allamah Muhammad bin Hadi - wrote an article in an attempt to refute the noble Shaykh, Al-Allamah Muhammad bin Hadi al- Madkhali, may Allah preserVe him. This article howeVer has only further exposed the oppressiVe and deceptiVe nature of Abu Khadeejah and has highlighted his ignorance regarding issues connected to the Deen of Allah. Abul-Qaasim Ibn Asaakir – may Refuting the Oppression, Page 3 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM Allah have mercy on him – said, “The flesh of the scholars – may Allah have mercy on them – is poisonous. And Allah’s way of exposing those who speak ill of the scholars is well-known.” The reader will also – by the permission of Allah – come to learn about how Abu Khadeejah plays with the Deen of Allah and how he changes his stances in accordance with his desires. In addition, what is really astonishing is his lack of fear of Allah and his shameless behaviour when speaking about the Awliya of Allah, the Salafi scholars. We adVise this repulsiVe indiVidual to fear Allah and know his small station and not fabricate falsehood against the mountains of knowledge. A small goat that butts its head against a mountain should have mercy on its own head more than on the mountain! In this short report, we will – by the permission of Allah – focus only on one of the sections in the aboVe- mentioned article written by Abu Khadeejah. The section which we would like to shed some light on for the one seeking the truth is “Allamah Rabee Refuting the Oppression, Page 4 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM Al-Madkhali Refutes and Rebukes Muhammad Ibn Hadi in the Issue of Iman and the Accusation of Irja”. Further refutations of the other blunders found within his eVil article will follow shortly by the permission of Allah. A Brief History : The Halabi Papers On the 12th of September 2000, the Lajnah Ad- Daaimah (the Permanent Committee) consisting of the Mufti of Saudi Arabia (Shaykh Abdul-Azeez Aal ash-Shaykh), Shaykh Saleh Al-Fawzaan, Shaykh Abdullah Al-Ghudayaan and Shaykh Bakr Abu Zayd issued a Verdict refuting two books written by Ali Hasan Al-Halabi. The Permanent Committee stated that these books called to the Madhhab of Irjaa and opposed Ahlus-Sunnah in the issues of Imaan and Kufr. The Permanent Committee also said that these books were not permissible to be printed, distributed or spread due to what they contained of falsehood and distortion. This then led to the dispute and debate between the Permanent Committee and Refuting the Oppression, Page 5 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM Al-Halabi. A very important fact to remember at this point is that the position of Imam Al-Fazwaan and the Permanent Committee on the issue of Imaan is that the person who abandons actions altogether is not a Muslim and the one who claims that he is a Muslim has fallen into Irjaa. Noble reader, please note that this is the Very same position as Shaykh Muhammad bin Haadi on the issue of Imaan as well as other respectable Salafi scholars. This will insha’Allah be further elaborated on during this article. Immediately after the Verdict of the Lajnah, Salafi Publications (SP) began its staunch defence of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi against Shaykh Saleh Al-Fawzaan and against the Permanent Committee. They issued a three part series entitled “The Halabi Papers”. Part 1 consisting of 16 pages was published by SP on the 20th of September 2000 just days after the refutation of the Permanent Committee against Al-Halabi. During the “Introduction” of Part 1, SP state: Refuting the Oppression, Page 6 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM And there is no doubt that the Permanent Committee and its members, in our View, are people of knowledge and excellence, who are deserVing of respect and loVe – but that does not at the same time necessitate that they are free from error and that their sayings are representatiVe of the absolute truth – since consideration is giVen to eVidence and as the reader will see in what is yet to come (of Shaikh Ali’s reply in the next Paper) – the eVidence is actually with Shaikh Ali Hasan – and his View is but the View of the two notable Imams of the Era on the issues of Imaan and Kufr and Takfir and the Secular Laws and the likes. From the aboVe quote, one can clearly see that SP have declared Ali Hasan to be correct “on the issues of Imaan and Kufr and Takfir and the Secular Laws and the likes” and the Permanent Committee to be wrong. SP further go on to say that the position of Ali Hasan on the aforementioned issues conforms to the stance of Imam Al-Albaani and Imam Bin Baaz, may Refuting the Oppression, Page 7 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM Allah have mercy on them. On a side note, another interesting point to reflect upon from the aboVe quote is that SP mention that despite the fact that the members of the Permanent Committee are respectable scholars, they are not free from error and that consideration must be giVen to the evidence. Furthermore, on page eight, SP mention a statement of Imam Bin Baaz where he said: Muhammad bin Ibrahim [the Mufti before Shaykh Bin Baz] is not infallible (Ma’soom), he is but a scholar from amongst the scholars, he is sometimes correct and sometimes in error and he is not a Prophet nor a Messenger. Likewise, Shaikh ul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn ul-Qayyim, Ibn Kathir and other scholars. All of them are sometimes correct and they sometimes err. But only what conforms to the truth is taken from their statements and as for what opposes the truth, then it is rejected from the one who said it. Refuting the Oppression, Page 8 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM This is in fact contrary to what SP are upon today in that nowadays they are continuously calling the Salafis to blind-follow the noble Shaykh, the Muhaddith, Al-Allamah Rabee bin Hadi Al-Madkhali, and they have disregarded all eVidence against the Sa’afiqah. MoreoVer, if a Salafi makes a statement such as “Shaykh Rabee is not free from mistake”, SP accuse him of belittling Shaykh Rabee and accuse him of trying to bring down the Shaykh. HoweVer, when it agreed with their desires, they quite boldly said that the Permanent Committee are not free from error, i.e. they are humans who can make a mistake. We can therefore deduce from the aboVe that SP are a people who change their stances in accordance with their desires and they apply the Ahkaam of the Sharee’ah as and when it suits them. That is to say that at times SP propagate – rightfully so – that scholars are humans and they can err. And at other times, they equate such statements to belittling the scholars and to bringing them down! This is why Hudhayfah bin al-Yamaan - may Allah be pleased Refuting the Oppression, Page 9 Deception and Ignorance of Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Wahid (SP) www.Sa’āfiqah.com | @SaafiqahCOM with him – said, "Know that misguidance, true misguidance is that you acknowledge what you used to reject and you reject what you used to acknowledge. And beware of changing colours in the religion, for indeed the Deen of Allah is only one." We say: This point about scholars making mistakes is the absolute truth which is proven by the Qur’an, the Sunnah, the intellect and the reality, and no one denies this “except him who befools himself”. Part 2 of “The Halabi Papers” which is titled “A Response to the Permanent Committee’s Verdict” was published by SP on the 22nd of September 2000.