DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Provided for Livestock Forests and Grasslands Highlights: Grazing, Mineral Extraction, 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Provided for Livestock Forests and Grasslands Highlights: Grazing, Mineral Extraction, 2 on all kinds of public and he mission of the private land stewardship U.S. Forest Service work across the state. is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity ● With the help of numerous of the nation’s forests and partners, we achieved all grasslands to meet the of our planned natural needs of present and future resource and public service generations. To implement this work for the benefit of mission, the U.S. Forest Service the public, including fire uses a five-year strategic plan stakeholders have made management, hazardous with specific direction for the toward achieving many fuels reduction, watershed agency. The plan contains four successes in caring for the land restoration, and fish outcome-oriented goals: and serving people. and wildlife habitat improvement. We also 1. Sustain Our National So here are a few 2017 provided for livestock Forests and Grasslands highlights: grazing, mineral extraction, 2. Deliver Benefits to the ● We worked closely with forest products, and People the State of Nevada, a variety of outdoor 3. Apply Knowledge the Bureau of Land recreation experiences. Globally Management (BLM), and We are proud and humbled 4. Excel as a High- the U.S. Fish and Wildlife to be entrusted with the Preforming Agency Service (USFWS) to stewardship of our public identify opportunities for We have worked hard on lands and look forward to developing credits under the Humboldt-Toiyabe another productive year in Nevada’s Conservation National Forest to meet the 2018 on the Humboldt-Toiyabe Credit System on public objectives for each goal since National Forest. the plan was introduced in lands to mitigate impacts to 2015. Featured in this “Year sage-grouse habitat. Sincerely, In Review”report are the ● We signed a Good Forest’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Neighbor Agreement with accomplishments toward the Nevada Departments those goals. I am very proud of Agriculture, Wildlife, of the tremendous efforts and Conservation and Bill Dunkelberger our dedicated employees, Natural Resources, enabling Forest Supervisor cooperators, partners, and enhanced collaboration Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Sustain Our National Forests and Grasslands Strategic Objectives: • Foster resilient and adaptive ecosystems • Mitigate wildfire risk • Conserve open space Deliver Benefits to the People Strategic Objectives: • Provide abundant clean water • Strengthen communities • Connect people to the outdoors Apply Knowledge Globally Strategic Objectives: • Advance knowledge • Transfer technology and applications • Exchange natural resource expertise Excel as a High-Preforming Agency Management Objectives: • Recruit a diverse workforce • Promote an inclusive culture • Attract and retain top employees U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. on forest, rangeland, and Service, BLM, USFWS, he Humboldt- watershed restoration projects scientists, landowners, Toiyabe National on more than 53 million acres conservation organizations, Forest is essential to the of federally managed lands in and many others. ecological, physical, biological, Nevada. economic, cultural, and social Project Decision Signed well-being of communities Credits Used in Nevada to The Forest issued a decision in Nevada and portions of Mitigate Sage-Grouse notice and final environmental eastern California. Through The State of Nevada released assessment on the Currant- direct natural resource the first credits for sale under Ellison Watershed Restoration management; the pursuit and its Conservation Credit System Project. The 185,000-acre exchange of new knowledge; to mitigate impacts to sage- project area is located on the and partnerships with private, grouse habitat. The system Ely Ranger District entirely county, state, and other was developed through a within the White Pine Range federal landowners, the Forest collaborative effort among about 30 miles southwest has the capability to support the State of Nevada, Forest of Ely, Nevada. The project sustainable will improve and stewardship. restore habitats for wildlife species Good Neighbor (e.g. sage-grouse, Authority Promotes desert bighorn Collaboration sheep, and mule deer) and important The State of vegetative Nevada, Forest communities (e.g. Service, and BLM sagebrush and signed a 10-year riparian areas). In Good Neighbor addition, it creates Authority Master (Top Photo) Nora Rasure, Forest Service Intermountain Regional Forester, signs fuel breaks and Agreement and the Good Neighbor Agreement at an event at the Galena Creek Visitor Center in reduces hazardous a Memorandum Reno, Nevada. (Bottom Photo) Other agency participants included (From Left To Right) Nora Rasure; Randy Moore, Forest Service Pacific Southwest Regional fuels to increase the of Understanding Forester; Sheila Anderson, Policy Advisor for the Office of Governor Brian success of managing making it easier for Sandoval; Jim Barbee, Nevada Department of Agriculture Director; Marci L. Todd, BLM Acting State Director; Brad Crowell, Nevada Department of Conservation wildfires within state and federal and Natural Resources Director; and Tony Wasley, Nevada Department of Wildlife and adjacent to the agencies to partner Director. project area. umboldt-Toiyabe National Forest employees and over 20 volunteers gathered at Sweetwater Flat on the Bridgeport Ranger District to remove pinyon pine and juniper seedlings, and small trees from important Bi-State sage-grouse breeding and nesting habitat. Volunteers were from the Sierra Club, Audubon Society, Eastern Sierra Interpretive Association, Eastern Sierra Land Trust, and surrounding communities. The Bridgeport Ranger District’s wilderness and trail crew were also on hand. “We worked in a unit that had been treated around 10 years ago, and it was a good time to go back to remove new conifer growth,” said Monique Nelson, Sage-Grouse Coordinator for the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. “Pinyon and juniper grow on lands managed by the Forest Service, with above the low sagebrush providing perches another 280,000 acres of habitat managed by for predators like ravens and hawks that the BLM. watch for sage-grouse moving in the “This project was part of a greater effort to sagebrush. Sage-grouse nestlings and eggs preserve sage-grouse populations and prioritize are vulnerable to these predators.” conservation efforts across the Bi-State sage- “This project provided a great opportunity grouse range,” said Nelson. for a diverse group of people to come “Proactive conservation efforts like this help together and spend a day outside making to keep Bi-State sage-grouse off of the a difference,” added Nelson. “There were Endangered Species List,” said Susanna people from Reno, Carson City, Gardnerville, Danner, Land Conservation Program Director for Yerington, Bridgeport, Lee Vining, and Eastern Sierra Land Trust. elsewhere.” “Restoring habitat for sage-grouse also helps The Bi-State sage-grouse is a distinct us learn about our shared public lands and the population segment of the greater sage- wildlife that depends on them,” said Danner. grouse. Most of its habitat is found in “When people are connected to the land it Douglas, Esmeralda, Lyon, and Mineral is good for communities, and good for the Counties in Nevada, and Alpine, Inyo, and habitat. Ranchers, hunters, and birdwatchers Mono Counties in California. About 426,000 all can embrace the concept of a healthy sage acres of the bird’s sagebrush habitat is found ecosystem.” Photo: A YCC crew plants willow stakes as a part of the West Fork Carson Watershed Restoration Project in Hope Valley, California. he Humboldt-Toiyabe central Nevada; and working subject matter experts from National Forest plays a with Natural Resources other local, state, and federal pivotal role in providing Conservation Service. agencies. The goal of the a wide range of benefits meeting was to generate Stream Restoration Work to the American people. creative ideas and dialog Continues Land management that is about how private, non-profit, sustainable enables the Forest The Santa Rosa Ranger and government sectors to produce goods and services District continues to restore can collectively improve to meet multiple public meadows in the 23,720-acre management of the National demands. Managing complex North Fork Little Humboldt Recreation Area’s recreation land uses is a challenge, but River priority watershed in opportunities for the benefit of working collaboratively helps northern Humboldt County in the visiting public. the Forest be successful. Nevada. The District restored hydrologic function through Big Springs Mine Project Approved by Forest Watershed Management multiple treatment methods Team Receives Award in seven meadows including The Mountain City-Ruby The Forest’s Watershed stabilizing headcuts and Mountains-Jarbidge Ranger Management Team was raising grade level. The largest District approved Anova awarded the Soil and Water meadow treated was 60 acres. Metals USA LLC to begin Conservation Society’s Merit The District also started phase mining for gold at the former Award. The team received two of the planned restoration Big Springs Mine site, which this award for their work work the Holloway Meadow. was mined between 1987 protecting and enhancing These meadows are important and 1993. The mine is located watersheds on the Forest. habitat for sage-grouse and approximately 63 miles Specific accomplishments other wildlife. northwest of Elko, Nevada. include increasing stream The signed Big Springs Mine Community Recreation function at Hope
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain
    Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain, Co-Ordinator TrailSafe Nevada 1285 Baring Blvd. Sparks, NV 89434 [email protected] Nev. Dept. of Cons. & Natural Resources | NV.gov | Governor Brian Sandoval | Nev. Maps NEVADA STATE PARKS http://parks.nv.gov/parks/parks-by-name/ Beaver Dam State Park Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park Big Bend of the Colorado State Recreation Area Cathedral Gorge State Park Cave Lake State Park Dayton State Park Echo Canyon State Park Elgin Schoolhouse State Historic Site Fort Churchill State Historic Park Kershaw-Ryan State Park Lahontan State Recreation Area Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park Sand Harbor Spooner Backcountry Cave Rock Mormon Station State Historic Park Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort State Historic Park Rye Patch State Recreation Area South Fork State Recreation Area Spring Mountain Ranch State Park Spring Valley State Park Valley of Fire State Park Ward Charcoal Ovens State Historic Park Washoe Lake State Park Wild Horse State Recreation Area A SOURCE OF INFORMATION http://www.nvtrailmaps.com/ Great Basin Institute 16750 Mt. Rose Hwy. Reno, NV 89511 Phone: 775.674.5475 Fax: 775.674.5499 NEVADA TRAILS Top Searched Trails: Jumbo Grade Logandale Trails Hunter Lake Trail Whites Canyon route Prison Hill 1 TOURISM AND TRAVEL GUIDES – ALL ONLINE http://travelnevada.com/travel-guides/ For instance: Rides, Scenic Byways, Indian Territory, skiing, museums, Highway 50, Silver Trails, Lake Tahoe, Carson Valley, Eastern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southeast95 Adventure, I 80 and I50 NEVADA SCENIC BYWAYS Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Nevada Wilderness 2007 Stewardship Accomplishments
    Friends of Nevada Wilderness 2007 Stewardship Accomplishments The Friends of Nevada Wilderness Stewardship Program 249 volunteers completed 33 projects has two components – wilderness restoration and across Nevada to make 2007 a very monitoring, and wilderness education. Friends successful year for wilderness organizes volunteer restoration and monitoring projects stewardship. in coordination with our federal land management partners to help our wildlands heal from negative impacts such as damage caused by off-road vehicles, proliferation of invasive weeds, and lack of proper trail maintenance. Friends also helps our managing agencies with other data-collection needs such as recreational use and associated impacts. Our stewardship projects always include an educational component for our volunteers on the benefits of, and need to protect, wilderness in Nevada, along with updates to volunteers on current legislative activity concerning potential wilderness areas Volunteer crew © Photo by Brian Beffort and ways they can get involved. Wilderness Stewardship Program 2007 Accomplishments: Total Number of Restoration and Monitoring Projects: 33 Total Number of Volunteers: 249 Total Volunteer Hours Benefiting Wilderness: 6,048 Total Dollar Value In-Kind Labor: $85,193 Total Outreach Events/Educational Presentations: 21 Restoration & Monitoring Projects: Date: January 3, 2007 Project: OHV/snowmobile monitoring Location: Mt. Rose Wilderness and potential wilderness additions Agency and Other Partners: U.S. Forest Service and Snowlands Network Number of Volunteers: 3 Volunteer Hours: 9 In-Kind Labor: $135.00 Project Description: Friends of Nevada Wilderness volunteers snowshoed along the Mt. Rose Wilderness boundary and monitored illegal snowmobile intrusions into the wilderness and adjacent non-motorized roadless area through use of GPS and photographs, and reported findings to Forest Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3.14 Special Designations
    Appendix F3.14 Special Designations Clark, Lincoln, and White Pine Counties Groundwater Development Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement 228 ALT 93 93 Elko County White Pine County 278 Tooele County 2 Callao 489 Juab County Blue Mass Scenic Area 893 Gandy Salt Marsh Juab County 892 93 Millard County Eureka Opt. 1 McGill Delta Gandy Mountain Caves 50 486 Swamp Cedar Ely Rose Guano Bat Cave Baker Eureka Honeymoon Archaeological Site County Hill / City of Rocks Eskdale 6 White Pine County 487 159 Baker Snake Creek Nye County Shoshone Ponds Garrison Indian Burial Cave Fossil Mountain Opt. 2 894 Wah Baking Powder Flat Wah 318 Mountains 15 Sev Millard County Coun 6 Beaver County 21 White River Valley 93 Beaver County Iron County Opt. 3 Nye County Highland Range Lincoln County 375 Pioche Condor Canyon Panaca Garfield County Pahroc Rock Art Schlesser Mount Irish Pincushion 56 Iron County 318 Caliente 120 Hiko Washington County Opt. 4 317 93 Alamo Shooting Upper Beaver Kane Gallery Lower Meadow Dam Wash Valley Wash County Lower Meadow 89 Valley Mormon Wash 15 Mesa - Ely Nevada Utah Kane Springs Mormon Mesa - Ely Arizona 389 Lincoln County Mesquite Beaver Dam Slope Mormon Mesa Clark County 15 168 Virgin River Mormon Mesa/Arrow Canyon Virgin Mountains Project Components Gold Buried Storage Reservoir and Indian Coyote Arrow Canyon Springs Butte, Water Treatment Facility Springs 95 Part A Construction Support Area Pressure Reducing Station Primary Electrical Substation Hidden Secondary Electrical Substation Valley Pumping Station and Primary
    [Show full text]
  • The Shrinking Sagebrush Sea
    MISSION STATEMENT WildEarth Guardians protects and restores the wildlife, wild places and wild rivers of the American West. Inquiries about this report and WildEarth Guardians' work can be made directly to: Mark Salvo, WildEarth Guardians 503-757-4221, [email protected] Cartography and analyses: Kurt Menke, Bird's Eye View GIS Front cover photo: James Ownby © WildEarth Guardians All rights reserved. No part of this report may be used in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, except in the case of brief quotations. Inquires should be addressed to: 312 Montezuma Avenue, Santa Fe, NM 87501 The Shrinking Sagebrush Sea Executive Summary In the sagebrush lands of the West… the natural landscape is eloquent of the interplay of forces that have created it. It is spread before us like the pages of an open book in which we can read why the land is what it is and why we should preserve its integrity. But the pages lie unread. Rachel Carson ● Silent Spring (1962) Despite its size, the Sagebrush Sea (scientifically known as “sagebrush steppe”) is one of the most endangered landscapes in North America. The Sagebrush Sea has been reduced in area by as much as 50 percent since European settlement. Livestock grazing, natural gas and oil development, agricultural conversion, roads, fences, powerlines and pipelines, off-road vehicle use, urban sprawl, mining, unnatural fire, and invasive weeds are fragmenting or degrading much of what remains. Greater sage-grouse are a sagebrush obligate species whose range has been significantly reduced with the loss of sagebrush steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Toiyabe National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Table of Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture NATIONAL FOREST PREFACE This National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) was developed to direct the management of the Toiyabe National Forest. The goal df the Plan is to provide a management program reflective of a mixture of management activities that allow use and protection of Forest resources; fulfill legislative requirements; and address local, regional, and national issues and concerns. To accomplish this, the Forest Plan: SPECIFIES THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES AND THE APPROXIMATE TIMING AND VICINITY OF THE PRACTICES NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THAT DIRECTION; AND ESTABLISHES THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT THE DIRECTION IS CARRIED OUT AND TO DETERMINE HOW WELL OUTPUTS AND EFFECTS WERE PREDICTED. The Forest Plan will be reviewed (and updated if necessary) at least every five years. It will be revised on a IO- to 15-year cycle. Preparation of the Forest Plan is required by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA). Assessment of its environmental impacts is required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the implementing regulations of NFMA (36 WR 219). The Forest Plan replaces all previous resource management plans prepared for the Toiyabe National Forest. Upon approval of the Forest Plan, all subsequent activities affecting the Forest must be in compliance with the Forest Plan. In addition, all permits, contracts and other instruments for the use and 0 occupancy of National Forest System lands mst be in conformance with the Forest Plan. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNINC LEVELS Development of this Forest Plan occurs within the framework of Forest Service regional and national planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Wilderness in Nevada's Rural Counties
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2001 Challenges for the New West: Economic impacts of wilderness in Nevada's rural counties Lesley Regina Argo University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Argo, Lesley Regina, "Challenges for the New West: Economic impacts of wilderness in Nevada's rural counties" (2001). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/h3uf-jcn9 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm m aster. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may b e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submltlod. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough. substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sage-Grouse Recovery Alternative This Document Offers
    The Sage-grouse Recovery Alternative This document offers general comments and presents the Sage-Grouse Recovery Alternative for inclusion as a complete alternative in Bureau of Land Management environmental impact statements and resource management plans to conserve and recover Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus ) ( see 76 Fed. Reg. 77008; 77 Fed. Reg. 7178). The comments and alternative are also applicable to U.S. Forest Service land and resource use plans that will be amended as part of the announced planning process. We recommend that the Bureau and Land Management and Forest Service incorporate the planning issues, planning criteria, recommended land designations, and management stipulations described in this document in all environmental impact statements and land use plans that affect sage-grouse. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. XX II. GENERAL COMMENTS .................................................................................................. XX III. SAGE-GROUSE CONSERVATION PLANNING ........................................................... XX A. PLANNING PROCESS AND COMPONENTS B. PLANNING CRITERIA C. PLANNING ISSUES 1. Habitat Designations 2. Threats a. Vegetation Management b. Livestock Grazing c. Mineral Development d. West Nile Virus e. Roads and Off-Highway Vehicles f. Utility Corridors g. Fire h. Invasive Plants i. Conifer Encroachment j. Wind Energy Development k. Climate Change 3. Sagebrush
    [Show full text]
  • South Twin River Near Round Mountain, Nevada (Station 10249300)
    Hydrologic Benchmark Network Stations in the Western U.S. 1963-95 (USGS Circular 1173-D) Abstract and List of all HBN Introduction to Analytical Map Index Stations Circular Methods South Twin River near Round Mountain, Nevada (Station 10249300) To download a printer friendly PDF version of this information click here. This report details one of the approximately 50 stations in the Hydrologic Benchmark Network (HBN) described in the four-volume U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1173. The suggested citation for the information on this page is: Mast, M.A., and Clow, David W., 2000, Environmental characteristics and water-quality of Hydrologic Benchmark Network stations in the Western United States, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1173-D, 115 p. All of the tables and figures are numbered as they appear in each circular. Use the navigation bar above to view the abstract, introduction and methods for the entire circular, as well as a map and list of all of the HBN sites. Use the table of contents below to view the information on this particular station. Table of Contents 1. Site Characteristics and Land Use 2. Historical Water Quality Data and Time-Series Trends 3. Synoptic Water Quality Data 4. References and Appendices Site Characteristics and Land Use The South Twin River HBN Basin is in the Basin and Range physiographic province in the central part of Nevada (Figure 14. Map showing the study area in the South Twin River Basin and photograph showing the basin landscape). The topography of the area is Figure 14. Map showing the study area in the South Twin River Basin and photograph showing the basin landscape characterized by north- to northeast-trending mountain ranges separated by long alluviated valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    BLM 2012 BLM 2011 3.14 Special Designations and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics 3.14.1 Affected Environment 3.14.1.1 Overview Special designation areas are units of land that federal or state agencies manage QUICK REFERENCE for the protection and enhancement of specific resource values. This land ACEC – Area of Critical includes wilderness, WSAs, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Environmental Concern (ACECs), and other special management areas (e.g., National Wildlife Refuges ACM – Applicant Committed [NWRs] and ranges). Protection Measures GIS – Geographic Information Wilderness areas are established by Congress in accordance with the System Wilderness Act of 1964. Wilderness Areas are managed to preserve wilderness ISA – Instant Study Area characteristics. WSAs contain wilderness characteristics and are managed to LWC – Lands with Wilderness preserve those values until Congress either designates them as a wilderness area Characteristics or releases them for other uses. Instant Study Areas (ISAs) are a type of WSA NDOW – Nevada Department of Wildlife that contains primitive and natural qualities but are generally not recommended RFFA – Reasonably for wilderness. When the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) Foreseeable Future Actions was passed in 1976, BLM was required to provide recommendations on RMP – Resource Management wilderness areas formally identified as “natural” or “primitive” prior to Nov. 1, Plan 1975 under Section 603 and those areas remain as ISAs. ACECs are BLM- ROW – Right-of-way designated areas where special management attention is required to protect and USFS – U.S. Forest Service prevent irreparable damage to important historic, cultural, or scenic values, fish USFWS – U.S. Fish and and wildlife resources, and other natural systems or processes.
    [Show full text]