Report Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report Template BLM 2012 BLM 2011 3.14 Special Designations and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics 3.14.1 Affected Environment 3.14.1.1 Overview Special designation areas are units of land that federal or state agencies manage QUICK REFERENCE for the protection and enhancement of specific resource values. This land ACEC – Area of Critical includes wilderness, WSAs, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Environmental Concern (ACECs), and other special management areas (e.g., National Wildlife Refuges ACM – Applicant Committed [NWRs] and ranges). Protection Measures GIS – Geographic Information Wilderness areas are established by Congress in accordance with the System Wilderness Act of 1964. Wilderness Areas are managed to preserve wilderness ISA – Instant Study Area characteristics. WSAs contain wilderness characteristics and are managed to LWC – Lands with Wilderness preserve those values until Congress either designates them as a wilderness area Characteristics or releases them for other uses. Instant Study Areas (ISAs) are a type of WSA NDOW – Nevada Department of Wildlife that contains primitive and natural qualities but are generally not recommended RFFA – Reasonably for wilderness. When the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) Foreseeable Future Actions was passed in 1976, BLM was required to provide recommendations on RMP – Resource Management wilderness areas formally identified as “natural” or “primitive” prior to Nov. 1, Plan 1975 under Section 603 and those areas remain as ISAs. ACECs are BLM- ROW – Right-of-way designated areas where special management attention is required to protect and USFS – U.S. Forest Service prevent irreparable damage to important historic, cultural, or scenic values, fish USFWS – U.S. Fish and and wildlife resources, and other natural systems or processes. Many of the Wildlife Service special designations are managed to maintain wilderness characteristics and WSA – Wilderness Study Area cultural resources. In some instances, special designation areas promote the recovery of a specific species, such as the desert tortoise (BLM 2008, 1998; USFWS 2009). To identify special designations within the region of study, data were collected from the BLM, the USFS, and the National Atlas. The region of study includes all land within 5 miles of the ROWs and ancillary facilities, groundwater development areas, and the associated hydrologic basins. As noted in Table 3.14-1, the majority of special designations are either wilderness areas or ACECs. The special designations that are within the region of study are shown in Figures 3.14-1 and 3.14-2 and Figures F3.14-1 and F3.14-2 (Appendix F) and are listed in Table 3.14-2. There are no designated Wild and Scenic River segments in the region of study. However, there are two river segments on USFS lands in the northern part of the region of study identified as eligible for study under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Muncy Creek (wild) and Smith Creek (recreation, scenic, and wild). Table 3.14-1 Types and Occurrence of Special Designations Within the Region of Study Types of Special Designations1 Number of Special Designations Wilderness 29 ACECs 27 WSA/ISA 12 NWR/State Wildlife Management Areas 8 National Park/National Recreation Area 2 1 Does not include the Desert Biosphere Reserve and Experimental Range. Chapter 3, Section 3.14, Special Designations and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Chapter 3, Page 3.14-1 Affected Environment 2012 BLM 228 ALT 93 93 Elko County White Pine County 278 2 Callao Tooele County 489 Juab County Lander County Blue Mass Scenic Area 893 Gandy Mountain Caves Juab County 892 93 Eureka Millard County McGill Gandy Salt Marsh Delta 50 486 Swamp Cedar Honeymoon Ely Opt. 1 Rose Guano Bat Cave Eureka Hill / City County of Rocks Eskdale 6 White Pine County 487 159 Shoshone Ponds Baker Fossil Mountain Nye County Baker Garrison Archaeological Site Opt. 2 894 Snake Creek Wah Indian 318 Wah Mountains 15 Burial Cave Sevier Millard County County 6 Beaver County 21 White River Valley Baking Powder Flat 93 Opt. 3 Beaver County Iron County Highland Range Nye County Lincoln County Pioche 375 Lower Meadow Valley Wash Condor Canyon Garfield Mount Irish Panaca Schlesser Pincushion County 56 Pahroc Rock Art Iron County 318 120 Hiko Caliente Washington County Opt. 4 Upper Beaver Dam Wash 317 93 Alamo Kane County Shooting 89 Kane Springs Lower Meadow Valley Wash Project Components Gallery 15 Mormon Mesa - Ely Buried Storage Reservoir and Lower Meadow Valley Wash Nevada Utah Water Treatment Facility Construction Support Area Arizona Beatty Pressure389 Reducing Station Lincoln County Beaver Dam Slope Primary Electrical Substation Mormon Mesa Mesquite Clark County 15 168 Virgin River ACEC Secondary Electrical Substation Mormon Mesa/Arrow Canyon Virgin Mountains ACEC Indian Pumping Station and Primary Springs Coyote Gold Butte, Part A Electrical Substation 95 Arrow Canyon Springs Pressure Reducing Station and Secondary Electrical Substation Rainbow Gardens Pumping Station Mohave Regulating Tank Site County Pahrump Las Hidden Vegas Valley Gold Butte, Part B Proposed Power Line Centerline Proposed Pipeline Centerline 515 Boulder Groundwater Development Area 215 City 93 Coconino CountyAlternate Electrical Substation Site Califor Inyo County 15 Alignment Option ni Proposed Clark, Lincoln, and Natural Resources State Boundary OR ID White Pine Counties Groundwater Region of Study NV UT County Boundary Development Project Water Resources Region of Study Area of Critical Environmental Concern Figure 3.14-1 Interstate Highway US Highway Areas of Critical Environmental Concern CA Major Road 010 204060 Miles Kilometers 0315 060 AZ 1 inch equals 40 miles No Warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual use or aggregate use with other data. Chapter 3, Page 3.14-2 Chapter 3, Section 3.14, Special Designations and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Affected Environment BLM 2012 228 ALT 93 93 Elko County White Pine County Goshute Canyon 278 2 Callao Tooele County 489 Becky Peak Juab County Lander Fish Springs County National Wildlife Refuge 893 High Schells Wilderness Opt. 1 Juab County 892 93 Eureka Government Millard County Peak Bristlecone McGill Mount Delta Moriah 50 Shellback 486 White Mount Moriah Wilderness Ely Pine Range Wilderness Eureka Wilderness County Bald Mountain Wilderness Eskdale 6 White Pine County 487 159 Red Mountain Baker Garrison Nye County Wilderness Opt. 2 Currant 894 Highland Mountain Mount Ridge Wilderness 318 Grafton 15 South Egan Range Sevier Millard County County 6 Fortification Beaver County 21 Far South Egans Range Grant Range Wilderness 93 Parsnip White Quinn Canyon Wilderness Opt. 3 Peak Rock Beaver County Range Iron County Nye County Weepah Lincoln County Spring Pioche 375 Worthington Mountains Panaca Garfield County Big Rocks 56 Caliente Iron County 318 120 Hiko Washington County Mount Irish Tunnel Spring South Pahroc Range Opt. 4 317 Clover Pahranagat National 93 Alamo Mountains Wildlife Kane Refuge County Project Components89 Delamar 15 Mountains Buried Storage Reservoir and Meadow Nevada Water Treatment Facility Valley Mormon Utah Range Mountains Construction Support Area Arizona Beatty Pressure389 Reducing Station Desert National Lincoln County Meadow Valley Range Mesquite Wildlife Range Primary Electrical Substation Clark County 15 168 Secondary Electrical Substation Indian Moapa National Pumping Station and Primary Springs Arrow Canyon Wildlife Electrical Substation 95 Refuge Pressure Reducing Station and Secondary Electrical Substation Mount Pumping Station Charleston Lime Canyon Wilderness Muddy Mountains Mohave Regulating Tank Site LaMadre County Mountain Pahrump Las Jumbo Spring Wilderness Proposed Power Line Centerline Wilderness Vegas Proposed Pipeline Centerline 515 Boulder Groundwater Development Area 215 City 93 Coconino CountyAlternate Electrical Substation Site Califor Inyo County 15 Alignment Option ni Natural Resources NPS Wilderness Proposed Clark, Lincoln, and ID OR Region of Study BLM Wilderness White Pine Counties Groundwater NV UT Water Resources USFS Research Natural Area Development Project Region of Study USFS Wilderness Interstate Highway BLM Wilderness Study Areas Figure 3.14-2 US Highway BLM Instant Study Area Major Road Desert Biosphere Reserve Wilderness, WSAs, NWRs, and State Boundary and Experimental Range other Special Management Areas CA County Boundary National Wildlife Refuge/Range 010 204060 Rivers eligible for Study Miles Great Basin National Park Kilometers under the provisions of the 0420 080 AZ Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 1 inch equals 40 miles No Warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual use or aggregate use with other data. Chapter 3, Section 3.14, Special Designations and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Chapter 3, Page 3.14-3 Affected Environment 2012 BLM Table 3.14-2 Special Designations that Occur within the Region of Study Crossed by Within ROWs or Groundwater Responsible Total Acres Ancillary Development Agency Name Protected Resource of Area Facilities Areas BLM Arden ACEC /Desert Tortoise Historic railroad construction 1,480 No No Conservation Center and mining; desert tortoise BLM Arrow Canyon Wilderness Wilderness characteristics 27,530 No No BLM Baker Archaeological Site ACEC Cultural resources 80 No Yes BLM Baking Powder Flat ACEC Protected butterfly 13,640 No Yes BLM Becky Peak Wilderness Wilderness
Recommended publications
  • 1 Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain
    Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain, Co-Ordinator TrailSafe Nevada 1285 Baring Blvd. Sparks, NV 89434 [email protected] Nev. Dept. of Cons. & Natural Resources | NV.gov | Governor Brian Sandoval | Nev. Maps NEVADA STATE PARKS http://parks.nv.gov/parks/parks-by-name/ Beaver Dam State Park Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park Big Bend of the Colorado State Recreation Area Cathedral Gorge State Park Cave Lake State Park Dayton State Park Echo Canyon State Park Elgin Schoolhouse State Historic Site Fort Churchill State Historic Park Kershaw-Ryan State Park Lahontan State Recreation Area Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park Sand Harbor Spooner Backcountry Cave Rock Mormon Station State Historic Park Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort State Historic Park Rye Patch State Recreation Area South Fork State Recreation Area Spring Mountain Ranch State Park Spring Valley State Park Valley of Fire State Park Ward Charcoal Ovens State Historic Park Washoe Lake State Park Wild Horse State Recreation Area A SOURCE OF INFORMATION http://www.nvtrailmaps.com/ Great Basin Institute 16750 Mt. Rose Hwy. Reno, NV 89511 Phone: 775.674.5475 Fax: 775.674.5499 NEVADA TRAILS Top Searched Trails: Jumbo Grade Logandale Trails Hunter Lake Trail Whites Canyon route Prison Hill 1 TOURISM AND TRAVEL GUIDES – ALL ONLINE http://travelnevada.com/travel-guides/ For instance: Rides, Scenic Byways, Indian Territory, skiing, museums, Highway 50, Silver Trails, Lake Tahoe, Carson Valley, Eastern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southeast95 Adventure, I 80 and I50 NEVADA SCENIC BYWAYS Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Nevada Wilderness 2007 Stewardship Accomplishments
    Friends of Nevada Wilderness 2007 Stewardship Accomplishments The Friends of Nevada Wilderness Stewardship Program 249 volunteers completed 33 projects has two components – wilderness restoration and across Nevada to make 2007 a very monitoring, and wilderness education. Friends successful year for wilderness organizes volunteer restoration and monitoring projects stewardship. in coordination with our federal land management partners to help our wildlands heal from negative impacts such as damage caused by off-road vehicles, proliferation of invasive weeds, and lack of proper trail maintenance. Friends also helps our managing agencies with other data-collection needs such as recreational use and associated impacts. Our stewardship projects always include an educational component for our volunteers on the benefits of, and need to protect, wilderness in Nevada, along with updates to volunteers on current legislative activity concerning potential wilderness areas Volunteer crew © Photo by Brian Beffort and ways they can get involved. Wilderness Stewardship Program 2007 Accomplishments: Total Number of Restoration and Monitoring Projects: 33 Total Number of Volunteers: 249 Total Volunteer Hours Benefiting Wilderness: 6,048 Total Dollar Value In-Kind Labor: $85,193 Total Outreach Events/Educational Presentations: 21 Restoration & Monitoring Projects: Date: January 3, 2007 Project: OHV/snowmobile monitoring Location: Mt. Rose Wilderness and potential wilderness additions Agency and Other Partners: U.S. Forest Service and Snowlands Network Number of Volunteers: 3 Volunteer Hours: 9 In-Kind Labor: $135.00 Project Description: Friends of Nevada Wilderness volunteers snowshoed along the Mt. Rose Wilderness boundary and monitored illegal snowmobile intrusions into the wilderness and adjacent non-motorized roadless area through use of GPS and photographs, and reported findings to Forest Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • CR 21-14 Big Game Quotas for the 2021-2022 Season.Pdf
    State of Nevada Department of Wildlife Game Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste 120 ● Reno, NV 89511 (775) 688-1500 Fax (775) 688-1987 ____________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM April 20, 2021 To: Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners, County Advisory Boards to Manage Wildlife, and Interested Publics From: Mike Scott, Administrator, Game Division Title: Commission Regulation 21-14, 2021 Big Game Quotas for the 2021-2022 Season – For Possible Action Description: The Commission will establish regulations for the numbers of tags to be issued to mule deer, pronghorn antelope, elk, bighorn sheep, and mountain goats for the 2021-22 season Presenter: Wildlife Staff Specialists Cody Schroeder, Cody McKee, and Mike Cox Summary: Generally, the Game Division is recommending lower quotas than in 2020. Nevada is experiencing continued drought conditions which affect big game populations in predominantly negative ways. The Game Division follows the Guidelines for Harvest Management in Nevada to provide the proposed big game tag quotas for each species and Area, Unit, or Unit Group. Game biologists survey big game populations, analyze data, model populations, write status and trend reports for each species and provide quota recommendations for Interested Publics, County Advisory Board members, and Wildlife Commissioners to consider. The recommended quotas are intended to sustain a balance between male-to- female ratios in big game populations while providing recreational opportunity for the hunting public. Employing a team approach in generating quota recommendations, Game Division staff scrutinize survey data, harvest data, population models, and resulting quota recommendations ensuring post-season ratios or other metrics will be met within the harvest guidelines. Should ratios end up above or below the male-to- female ratio objective, adjustments to the quotas are made to address that discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3.14 Special Designations
    Appendix F3.14 Special Designations Clark, Lincoln, and White Pine Counties Groundwater Development Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement 228 ALT 93 93 Elko County White Pine County 278 Tooele County 2 Callao 489 Juab County Blue Mass Scenic Area 893 Gandy Salt Marsh Juab County 892 93 Millard County Eureka Opt. 1 McGill Delta Gandy Mountain Caves 50 486 Swamp Cedar Ely Rose Guano Bat Cave Baker Eureka Honeymoon Archaeological Site County Hill / City of Rocks Eskdale 6 White Pine County 487 159 Baker Snake Creek Nye County Shoshone Ponds Garrison Indian Burial Cave Fossil Mountain Opt. 2 894 Wah Baking Powder Flat Wah 318 Mountains 15 Sev Millard County Coun 6 Beaver County 21 White River Valley 93 Beaver County Iron County Opt. 3 Nye County Highland Range Lincoln County 375 Pioche Condor Canyon Panaca Garfield County Pahroc Rock Art Schlesser Mount Irish Pincushion 56 Iron County 318 Caliente 120 Hiko Washington County Opt. 4 317 93 Alamo Shooting Upper Beaver Kane Gallery Lower Meadow Dam Wash Valley Wash County Lower Meadow 89 Valley Mormon Wash 15 Mesa - Ely Nevada Utah Kane Springs Mormon Mesa - Ely Arizona 389 Lincoln County Mesquite Beaver Dam Slope Mormon Mesa Clark County 15 168 Virgin River Mormon Mesa/Arrow Canyon Virgin Mountains Project Components Gold Buried Storage Reservoir and Indian Coyote Arrow Canyon Springs Butte, Water Treatment Facility Springs 95 Part A Construction Support Area Pressure Reducing Station Primary Electrical Substation Hidden Secondary Electrical Substation Valley Pumping Station and Primary
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, and DE- VELOPMENT Subtitle A—Land Disp
    G:\COMP\109\WHITE PINE COUNTY CONSERVATION, RECREATION, A....XML White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 [Title III of division C of Public Law 109–432] [As Amended Through P.L. 116–9, Enacted March 12, 2019] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of the text of Public Law 109–432. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, * * * * * * * DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS * * * * * * * TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, AND DE- VELOPMENT SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec- essary to carry out this title. SEC. 302. ø16 U.S.C. 1241 note¿ SHORT TITLE This title may be cited as the ‘‘White Pine County Conserva- tion, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln County Conservation, Recreation and Development Act Of
    H. R. 4593 One Hundred Eighth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four An Act To establish wilderness areas, promote conservation, improve public land, and pro- vide for the high quality development in Lincoln County, Nevada, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act. SEC. 2. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lincoln County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2004’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 2. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—LAND DISPOSAL Sec. 101. Definitions. Sec. 102. Conveyance of Lincoln County land. Sec. 103. Disposition of proceeds. TITLE II—WILDERNESS AREAS Sec. 201. Findings. Sec. 202. Definitions. Sec. 203. Additions to National Wilderness Preservation System. Sec. 204. Administration. Sec. 205. Adjacent management. Sec. 206. Military overflights. Sec. 207. Native American cultural and religious uses. Sec. 208. Release of wilderness study areas. Sec. 209. Wildlife management. Sec. 210. Wildfire management. Sec. 211. Climatological data collection. TITLE III—UTILITY CORRIDORS Sec. 301. Utility corridor and rights-of-way. Sec. 302. Relocation of right-of-way and utility corridors located in Clark and Lin- coln counties in the State of Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shrinking Sagebrush Sea
    MISSION STATEMENT WildEarth Guardians protects and restores the wildlife, wild places and wild rivers of the American West. Inquiries about this report and WildEarth Guardians' work can be made directly to: Mark Salvo, WildEarth Guardians 503-757-4221, [email protected] Cartography and analyses: Kurt Menke, Bird's Eye View GIS Front cover photo: James Ownby © WildEarth Guardians All rights reserved. No part of this report may be used in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, except in the case of brief quotations. Inquires should be addressed to: 312 Montezuma Avenue, Santa Fe, NM 87501 The Shrinking Sagebrush Sea Executive Summary In the sagebrush lands of the West… the natural landscape is eloquent of the interplay of forces that have created it. It is spread before us like the pages of an open book in which we can read why the land is what it is and why we should preserve its integrity. But the pages lie unread. Rachel Carson ● Silent Spring (1962) Despite its size, the Sagebrush Sea (scientifically known as “sagebrush steppe”) is one of the most endangered landscapes in North America. The Sagebrush Sea has been reduced in area by as much as 50 percent since European settlement. Livestock grazing, natural gas and oil development, agricultural conversion, roads, fences, powerlines and pipelines, off-road vehicle use, urban sprawl, mining, unnatural fire, and invasive weeds are fragmenting or degrading much of what remains. Greater sage-grouse are a sagebrush obligate species whose range has been significantly reduced with the loss of sagebrush steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Q Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
    APPENDIX Q AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN APPENDIX Q APPENDIX Q AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (ACECs) The ACEC designation is an administrative designation used by the BLM that is accomplished through the land use planning process. It is unique to the BLM in that no other agency uses this form of designation. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act states that the BLM will give priority to the designation and protection of ACECs in the development and revision of land use plans. BLM regulations (43 Code of Federal Regulations part 1610) define an ACEC as an area “within the public lands where special management attention is required (when such areas are developed or used or where no development is required) to protect and prevent irreparable damage to important historic, cultural, or scenic values, fish and wildlife resources, or other natural systems or processes, or to protect life and safety from natural hazards.” Private lands and lands administered by other agencies are not included in the boundaries of ACECs. ACECs differ from other special management designations such as wilderness study areas in that designation by itself does not automatically prohibit or restrict other uses in the area (with the exception that a mining plan of operation is required for any proposed mining activity within a designated ACEC). In order to be designated, special management beyond standard provisions established by the plan must be required to protect the relevant and important values. RELEVANCE AND IMPORTANCE CRITERIA Relevance An area meets the relevance criteria if it contains one or more of the following: • A significant historic, cultural, or scenic value (including but not limited to rare or sensitive archeological resources and religious or cultural resources important to American Indians).
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Washoe Wild
    Frontlines 2 Spring Breakers Defend the Desert 3 WSAs Under Threat & Wall Canyon 4-5 Desert Refuge Updates 6 Wildlife & Mt. Charleston 7 INSIDE Stewardship & Public Lands Defense 8-9 Washoe Cont’d & Who’s New at FNW 10-11 SPRING/SUMMER 2018 NEVADAWILDERNESS.ORG KEEPING WASHOE WILD ashoe County is blessed with an abundance of public lands that provide sweeping vistas, expansive sagebrush seas, andW healthy populations of pronghorn, bighorn sheep, numerous reptiles, song birds and a stronghold for the Greater Sage-Grouse. In this wild region stretching north of Pyramid Lake to the Oregon border, the roads are dirt, there is little cell phone coverage, and nature rules. Unfortunately, the Washoe County Commissioners seem more interested in development than conservation and they are proposing to eliminate protections that have been in place since 1980 for many of these wild places. Their proposal to strip protections for 62% of our county’s Wilderness Study Areas is appalling. Fortunately during the public hearings held April 24th and 26th, your voices were heard loud and clear standing up for Wilderness and open space. The need for Wilderness - protected lands where the forces of nature are allowed the opportunity to operate, uninhibited from human interference – becomes more and more pressing as the population of the Truckee Meadows swells. Our quality of life, including a broad range of outdoor recreation opportunities and beautiful backcountry are what makes living in Washoe County special. Friends of Nevada Wilderness has been invested in working alongside local legislators and various stakeholders to help find a balance Continued on Page 10 A storm rolls in over Massacre Rim Wilderness Study Area.
    [Show full text]