DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of Bus-On-Shoulder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study of Bus-On-Shoulder Final Project Report Monterey Bay Area Feasibility Study of Bus on Shoulder Operations on State Route 1 and the Monterey Branch Line Monterey-Salinas Transit June 26, 2018 Acknowledgements Project Partners Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (METRO) California Highway Patrol (CHP) Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (SCCRTC) Technical Advisory Committee Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (METRO) Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (SCCRTC) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 5 California Highway Patrol (CHP) Divisions 720 & 730 Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) City of Marina City of Sand City City of Seaside City of Monterey Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction and Summary................................................................................1-1 Background – Legislation...............................................................................................................................................1-1 Plans and Policies – Monterey County ...........................................................................................................1-2 Plans and Policies – Santa Cruz County .........................................................................................................1-3 Purpose of the Study........................................................................................................................................................1-4 The Bus-on-Shoulder Concept...........................................................................................................................1-5 Monterey Branch Rail Line..................................................................................................................................1-5 Study Partners/Outreach...............................................................................................................................................1-6 Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................................1-7 Monterey County Alternatives...........................................................................................................................1-7 Santa Cruz County Alternatives......................................................................................................................1-12 Project Implementation and Next Steps.....................................................................................................1-17 Chapter 2 Literature Review..............................................................................................2-1 Bus-on-Shoulder ................................................................................................................................................................2-1 National Studies .......................................................................................................................................................2-1 State-Sponsored Studies.......................................................................................................................................2-2 TCRP Report 151 – A Guide for Implementing Bus-on-Shoulder (BOS) Systems.......................2-2 TCRP Synthesis 64 Bus Use of Shoulders – A Synthesis of Transit Practice..................................2-5 FHWA’s Use of Freeway Shoulders for Travel – A Guide for Planning, Evaluating, and Designing Part Time Shoulder Use as a Traffic Management Strategy............................................2-5 AASHTO Guide for Geometric Design of Transit Facilities on Highways and Streets ...............2-5 Minnesota Department of Transportation Bus Only Shoulder Guidelines.....................................2-6 Transit Lane Demonstration Pilot Report – San Diego...........................................................................2-7 I-55 Bus-on-Shoulder Demonstration – In the Spirit of Time..............................................................2-7 I-71 Cincinnati Left Shoulder Bus-on-Shoulder.........................................................................................2-8 Bus on Railroad Rights-of-Way ...................................................................................................................................2-8 Los Angeles Orange Line Busway.....................................................................................................................2-8 South Dade Busway................................................................................................................................................2-9 Hartford-New Britain Busway ........................................................................................................................2-10 Chapter 3 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................3-1 Background..........................................................................................................................................................................3-1 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................................3-1 Existing Traffic Conditions............................................................................................................................................3-4 Highway Configuration.........................................................................................................................................3-4 Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................................................3-4 Travel Times and Speeds .....................................................................................................................................3-8 Traffic Forecasts....................................................................................................................................................3-30 Existing Transit Conditions........................................................................................................................................3-32 Transit Services along Study Corridor ........................................................................................................3-32 Weekday Transit Operations...........................................................................................................................3-39 Transit Performance ...........................................................................................................................................3-42 Transit Ridership on SR 1 .................................................................................................................................3-43 i Table of Contents Geometric Design & Operating Guidelines ..........................................................................................................3-45 Forms of Bus-on-Shoulder Concept..............................................................................................................3-45 Existing Highway Geometrics..........................................................................................................................3-48 Monterey Branch Line ........................................................................................................................................3-58 Chapter 4 Project Alternatives...........................................................................................4-1 Monterey County ...............................................................................................................................................................4-1 Segment I: Reservation Road/SR 1 to Fremont Boulevard/SR 1......................................................4-2 Segment II: Fremont Boulevard/SR 1 to SR 218 ......................................................................................4-6 Segment III: SR 218 to Del Monte Avenue ................................................................................................4-10 Segment IV: Casa Verde Way/SR 1 to Fremont Boulevard/SR 1....................................................4-12 Santa Cruz County ..........................................................................................................................................................4-15 Right-Shoulder Alternatives ............................................................................................................................4-15 Left-Side Alternative ...........................................................................................................................................4-24 Cost Estimates..................................................................................................................................................................4-26 Methodology ...........................................................................................................................................................4-26
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sand City Sustainable Transportation Plan
    EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Sand City Sustainable Transportation Plan July 29, 2020 Prepared by EMC Planning Group EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT SAND CITY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN PREPARED FOR SAND CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Charles Pooler, City Planner 1 Pendergrass Way Sand City CA 93955 Tel 831.394.3054 PREPARED BY EMC PLANNING GROUP INC. 301 Lighthouse Avenue, Suite C Monterey, CA 93940 Tel 831.649.1799 Fax 831.649.8399 Richard James, AICP, MUP [email protected] www.emcplanning.com July 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ..........................................................................1-1 Policy Context .......................................................................................... 1-1 Local Setting ............................................................................................. 1-2 2.0 Background and Local Policy ...............................................2-1 Transit ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Bicycle and Pedestrian ............................................................................. 2-2 Impaired Mobility ...................................................................................... 2-4 Other Forms of Transportation .............................................................. 2-4 3.0 Current Conditions ...............................................................3-1 Transit .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tamcmonterey.Org
    TTAAMMCC Regional Transportation Planning Agency - Local Transportation Commission Monterey County Service Authority for Freeways & Expressways - Email: [email protected] AGENDA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAYS EMERGENCIES AND MONTEREY COUNTY REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JOINT POWERS AGENCY Wednesday, December 4, 2019 Agricultural Center Conference Room 1428 Abbo Street Salinas, California **9:00 AM** FOR WIRELESS INTERNET, CONNECT TO: ABBOTT CONF-GUEST PASSWORD: 1428AGGUEST (Agendas are on display and are posted 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeng at the Transportaon Agency office and at these public libraries: Carmel, Monterey, Salinas Steinbeck Branch, Seaside, Prunedale, King City, Hartnell College, Monterey Peninsula College, and Cal State University Monterey Bay. Any person who has a queson concerning an item on this agenda may call the Transportaon Agency office at 831-775-0903 to make inquiry concerning the nature of the item described on the agenda.) The agenda and all enclosures are available on the Transportaon Agency website: www.tamcmonterey.org, by clicking on Transportaon Agency Board, meengs and agendas, click on agenda item and open it, click on report aachments listed at end of report. 1. QUORUM CHECK – CALL TO ORDER Transportaon Agency by-laws require a quorum of a minimum of 9 vong members, including a minimum of 7 city representaves and 1 county representave. If you are unable to aend, please contact your alternate. Your courtesy to the other Transportaon Agency Board members to assure a quorum is appreciated. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Page 1 of 146 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person may address the Transportaon Agency Board at this me.
    [Show full text]
  • Calam Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project Draft
    4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Sections Figures Tables 4.7.1 Setting 4.7-1 Environmental Cases Near 4.7-1 Open Environmental Cases Identified 4.7.2 Regulatory Framework Project Components – Within 0.25 Mile of the Project Area Northern Portion 4.7.3 Impacts and Mitigation 4.7-2 Schools in the Vicinity of Project Measures 4.7-2 Environmental Cases Near Components Project Components – 4.7-3 Applicable State, Regional, and Local Southern Portion Plans and Polices Relevant to Hazards and Hazardous Materials 4.7-4 Summary of Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts 4.7-5 MPWSP Desalination Plant (9.6 mgd) - Water Treatment Chemicals This section presents an evaluation of the potential for hazards and hazardous materials impacts related to the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP or proposed project). Existing conditions in the project area and the regulatory requirements pertaining to hazardous materials management are discussed. This section evaluates potential hazardous materials and health and safety impacts, including the potential for hazardous materials to be encountered during project construction, for hazardous materials and/or hazardous wastes to be released into the environment during project construction and operation, and for project implementation to result in increased hazards related to wildland fires. The potential for project operations to interfere with ongoing remediation activities is addressed in Section 4.4, Groundwater Resources. The term “hazardous materials” refers to both hazardous substances and hazardous wastes. Under federal and state laws, certain materials, including wastes, may be considered hazardous if they are specifically listed by statute as such or if they are poisonous (toxicity); can be ignited by open flame (ignitability); corrode other materials (corrosivity); or react violently, explode, or generate vapors when mixed with water (reactivity).
    [Show full text]
  • Monterey-Salinas Transit District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
    MONTEREY-SALINAS TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA May 10, 2021 Time: 10:00 AM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Governor Newsom’s COVID-19 Executive Order N-25-20 allows MST to hold meetings via teleconference and to make meetings accessible electronically to protect public health. The May 10, 2021 will be held via Zoom conference. There will be NO physical location of the meeting. The public is asked to use the Zoom app for best reception. There may only be limited opportunity to provide oral comments during the meeting. Persons who wish to make public comment on an agenda item are encouraged to submit comments in writing by email to MST at [email protected] by 3:00 pm on Friday, May 7, 2021; those comments will be distributed to the legislative body before the meeting. Members of the public participating by Zoom are instructed to be on mute during the proceedings and to speak only when public comment is allowed, after requesting and receiving recognition from the Chair. Prior to the meeting, participants should download the Zoom app at: https://zoom.us/download A link to tutorials for use of the Zoom app is: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/206618765-Zoom-Video-Tutorials and https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/209743263-Meeting-and-Webinar-Best- Practices-and-Resources REMOTE CONFERENCE ONLY Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/93499251302?pwd=KzhhdGp2SlluS0VkV0VZUGwvWGlRdz09 Meeting ID: 934 9925 1302 Password: 132854 One tap mobile +16699006833,,93499251302#,,,,0#,,132854#
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter May 8
    LINGUISTIC AND SPATIAL PRACTICE IN A DIVIDED LANDSCAPE by Abigail Sone A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of PhD Graduate Department of Anthropology University of Toronto © Copyright by Abigail Sone 2009 LINGUISTIC AND SPATIAL PRACTICE IN A DIVIDED LANDSCAPE Abigail Sone Department of Anthropology University of Toronto PhD 2009 Abstract of Thesis This dissertation demonstrates how changes in spatial boundaries map on to changes in the boundaries of national belonging through an ethnography of linguistic and spatial practice in a divided landscape. In Israel, as in many places around the globe, new forms of segregation have emerged in recent years, as violence and the fear of violence become increasingly bound up with the production of social difference and exclusion. In Wadi Ara, a valley in the north of the country where my fieldwork was based, segregation between Jewish and Palestinian citizens has dramatically increased since the fall of 2000, as the place of Palestinians in a Jewish state is being reconfigured. In this dissertation I focus on the changing movements and interactions of Jewish Israelis in Wadi Ara as they articulate with changes in the ways difference, belonging, and citizenship are organized on a national scale. I examine how increased hostility, fear, and distrust have become spatialized; how narratives of the past shape contemporary geographies; how competing ways of interpreting and navigating the landscape are mediated; and how particular forms of encounter are framed. My central argument is that through daily linguistic and spatial practice people in Wadi Ara do more than just make sense of shifting boundaries; they bring these boundaries into being and, in the process, they enact both self‐definition and exclusion, reflecting and circumscribing ii the changing place of Palestinians in Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • MTP 2010 Projects
    The Long Range Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Monterey Bay Area How will people and goods move throughout the Monterey Bay Area from 2010 to 2035? The following document sets forth the plan to improve regional mobility by 2035. Monterey Bay Area Mobility 2035 The preparation of this plan was fi nanced, in part, by grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration, under the SAFETEA-LU act, and the local governments of the Monterey Bay Region. AMBAG Staff AMBAG Board of Directors John Doughty, Executive Director Patricia Stephens, President Randy Deshazo, Principal Planner Stephany Aguilar, Vice-President Bhupendra Patel, Senior Transportation Modeler Ed Laverone, 2nd Vice-President Sasha Tepedelenova, TDM/Planner Linda Meckel, Planner Ronald Graves, City of Capitola Steph A. Nelson, Planner Ken Talmage, City of Carmel-by-the-Sea David Johnston, GIS Coordinator Michael Zuccaro, City of Del Rey Oaks Anais Schenk, Intern Scott Funk, City of Gonzales Eugenia Sanchez, City of Hollister with contributions from: Jeff Pereira, City of King SBtCOG Staff Frank O’Connell, City of Marina Lisa Rheinheimer, Executive Director Libby Downey, City of Monterey Mary Gilbert, Transportation Planning Manager Carmelita Garcia, City of Pacifi c Grove Veronica Lezama, Transportation Planner Janet Barnes, City of Salinas Ed Laverone, City of San Juan Bautista SCCRTC Staff David Pendergrass, City of Sand City George Dondero, Executive Director Lynn Robinson, City of Santa Cruz Rachel
    [Show full text]
  • MTP 2010 Projects
    The Long Range Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Monterey Bay Area How will people and goods move throughout the Monterey Bay Area from 2010 to 2035? The following document sets forth the plan to improve regional mobility by 2035. Monterey Bay Area Mobility 2035 The preparation of this plan was fi nanced, in part, by grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration, under the SAFETEA-LU act, and the local governments of the Monterey Bay Region. Amendment No. 2 to the 2010 MTP Text Page # Current Text, Table or List Amended Text, Table or List Description 74 This group includes over 411 projects This group includes over 411 projects totaling $8.02 billion, including those that totaling over $8.019 billion, including those are already programmed and scheduled for that are already programmed and scheduled construction in the short term, projects that for construction in the short term, projects could be funded by a future local half cent that could be funded by a future local half sales tax measure, and other planned cent sales tax measure, and other planned projects which could be financially feasible projects which could be financially feasible to construct anytime within the 2010 MTP to construct anytime within the 2010 MTP full time line (2010-2035). full time line (2010-2035). 74 Unconstrained Projects — Given the Unconstrained Projects — Given the limited limited amount of funding available for amount of funding available for transportation projects and programs, there transportation projects and programs, there are over 464 projects totaling over $4.3 are over 463 projects totaling over $4.299 billion that cannot be implemented over the billion that cannot be implemented over the next twenty-five years unless there is next twenty-five years unless there is additional funding available for additional funding available for transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the Monterey Peninsula Light Rail Project
    TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE MONTEREY PENINSULA LIGHT RAIL PROJECT November 16, 2010 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PHASE MONTEREY PENINSULA LIGHT RAIL PROJECT TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY (TAMC) MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 16, 2010 Copyright 2010 Kleinfelder All Rights Reserved Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited by anyone other than the client for the specific project. 109205/GEOL (SAL10R205)/es Page i of v November 16, 2010 © 2010 Kleinfelder TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 3 2.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................. 3 2.2 SUMMARY OF KEY PROJECT FEATURES ............................................ 4 2.2.1 Track Restoration or Replacement, and Street/Grade Crossings ... 4 2.2.2 Bridges / Track Structures ............................................................... 5 2.2.3 Passenger Stations / Stops ............................................................. 6 2.2.4 Maintenance Facility and Operations Center .................................. 7 2.2.5 Recreation Trail Restoration ........................................................... 8 2.3 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS .................................................... 9 3
    [Show full text]
  • Mauerberger Building Technion City, Haifa 32000 By
    1. Getting to the Technion The Technion International School is located at: Mauerberger Building Technion City, Haifa 32000 By Car From Ben-Gurion Airport turn off the Tel Aviv/Haifa coastal Highway 2 at the first exit for Haifa (sign posted Haifa South, MATAM, Tirat Hacarmel). Bear left and at the first traffic light, turn right. Make a left turn at the next traffic light. You are now on Flieman Street. You will pass the Haifa Mall (Canyon Haifa) and Castra shopping mall on your right and the Congress Center on your left. Go straight through two sets of traffic lights and drive up the Carmel Mountain for 3 km. Halfway up, the road is renamed Weinshal and renamed again Freud Street towards the top. Near the top of the hill, drive straight through another set of traffic lights. At the top of the hill, Freud St. ends at a T-junction with traffic lights. At the junction, there are two lanes for turning left and one slip lane for turning right. As you approach these lights, stay in the center lane. At the lights, make a left turn and an immediate right turn at the next light onto Pica Road. Mercaz Horev Shopping Center will be on your immediate right. Driving down Pica Road, you will drive through four sets of traffic lights. Stay in the right-hand lane as you approach the yellow Paz gas station, and exit right down the slip lane, which is sign posted Neve Shaanan, Technion. Continue straight on this road (Hankin) staying in the left lane, and drive through a short tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Harakevet133.Pdf
    Series 35#2 Issue 133 June 2021 ����� ISSN - 0964-8763 133:02 133:04. (i). ELECTRIFICATION WORKS CONTINUE. Without wishing to get too morbid, the last issue was put together just as the Editor had lost his mother at the age of 96 and as Steve, who does so Israel Railways Ltd. announced on their website that due to track upgrading much for the layout, printing and despatch had lost his brother aged 88. While works the line between Beer-Sheva and Dimona would be closed for passenger we both struggled with other emotions we were exchanging e-mails, hunting traffic from Sunday 07.03.2021 at 05:00 until Sunday 14.03.2021 at 05:00. maps that got 'lost' in the system, correcting typos and so forth. And this is Due to electrification works, there are some changes to timetables of trains meant to be a 'hobby'! on the Ashkelon – Ashdod – Tel-Aviv – Herzliya line, at the stations of Rehovot Work on this issue went ahead rather placidly with much help from several and Rishon-LeZion HaRishonim and with some direct trains between Tel-Aviv people in several countries who sent information, but then in mid-May all hell and Haifa from 03.03.2021 between 05:00 and 06:00 and between 19:00 broke out once again with rocket attacks from Gaza into Central Israel, and and 20:00, so it will hardly disrupt passenger services. disturbances on top of this, affecting Tel Aviv, Lod, Modiin, Beersheba and more. At the time of writing the scene remains very confused, all we can say is that despite the mayhem and bloodshed there is as yet no information on (ii).
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for Transbay Terminal Caltrain Extension
    BayRail Alliance http://www.bayrailalliance.org No. 2004-2 September-November 2004 Editorial: New Caltrain Battle for Transbay Terminal Schedule Doesn’t Benefit All...2 Speed Up Your Caltrain Trip........3 VTA PR Plan Won’t Deliver...........4 Caltrain Extension continues Board Elections.............................4 Caltrain and Bikes .......................4 The fight for the Transbay Terminal Myers refused an offer of more than Monterey County Rail Plans........5 Project (TBTP) is by no means com- $32 million (fair market value) by the County Transportation Authority plete. We are still working hard to en- TJPA for the vacant land as well as of- (SFCTA) that proposed an “engineer- sure that the future underground tracks fers to find another suitable location to ing solution” to accommodate both for the Caltrain Downtown Extension construct his building. He is demand- projects. It calls for excavating the site, (DTX) to the new Transbay Terminal ing $175 million for the parcel — $143 installing engineered fill to replace the (TBT) are not blocked by a high-rise million over fair market value! He has unstable mud fill, building the 80 condominium tower that a private de- also refused to work with the TJPA to Natoma tower, and then later tunneling veloper, Jack Myers, plans to build on design his building in tandem with the under it removing over 80% of its foun- a vacant plot of land at 80 Natoma DTX tunnel to ensure that it could be dation on one side to build Caltrain Street in San Francisco. built without affecting the structural in- tegrity of his building.
    [Show full text]
  • Elle Flanders
    WHAT ISN’T THERE IMAGING PALESTINE Elle Flanders A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN VISUAL ARTS YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO MAY 2014 © Elle Flanders, 2014 i Abstract What Isn’t There is a research project that considers the possibility of creating an image of Palestine by documenting the 418 Palestinian villages that were erased with the establishment of the State of Israel. The work has taken many forms over a twenty-year period including: photography, film, sound and installation. At the heart of this project is a set of interwoven questions: Is an image of Palestine possible and what would constitute such an image? how do we consider the image if, as I argue, the realms of politics and art are not separate? in a world saturated by mediated images, what are the interventions we can make as artists not only to make meaning, but to make meaning matter? The film installation accompanying this dissertation is a four-screen film projection situated in an outdoor urban garden. The installation immerses the viewer in fifteen distinct landscapes that were once the locations of Palestinian villages. While these sites often contain little that reveal their origins, the placement of the installation, the repetition and juxtaposition of images all point to the imaging of Palestine. ii For my love, Tamira, who has traveled the land with me and knows it now as I do. iii Acknowledgments To acknowledge is to accept or admit the existence or the truth of something.
    [Show full text]