Placement of Items on Uniform

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Appendix G Placement of Items on Uniform The photos below are intended to serve as guidance for all employees wearing uniforms in the placement of various insignia and items on the uniform. The two general set ups are shown below. If uniform items will not fit as pictured, the optional items should not be worn so that there is adequate room for required items to be worn as pictured. The set up shown below also needs to be followed when wearing an external carrier. Police Officer/Law Enforcement Dispatcher Uniform Whistle Chain Collar Brass Flag or Awareness Pin Special Unit Insignia (s) Name Plate Badge Years of Service Award Ribbons Tie Tack Appendix G Security Officer Uniform Collar Brass Whistle Chain Flag or Awareness Pin Special Unit Insignia (S) Name Plate Badge Years of Service Award Ribbons Tie Tack Appendix G Multiple Awards Devices Valor Merit Lifesaving Excellent Community Award Ribbon w/star Ribbon w/star Ribbon Ribbon Ribbon 1st w/cross w/number w/shield Award Two Stars Two Stars Two Crosses #2 #2 2nd Award One Big Star One Big Star Three Crosses #3 #3 3rd Award Four Crosses #4 #4 4th Award 1 Cross w/blue #5 #5 5th boarder Award #6 #6 6th Award #7 #7 7th Award #8 #8 8th Award #9 #9 9th Award #10 #10 10th - 14th Award +15th Award Appendix G Award Ribbon Order of Precedence Meritorious Service Award (2) Commendation for Valor (1) Community Service Commendation Excellent Service Award (4) Lifesaving Award (3) (5) Sample of Five Awards Five Awards – Situated above the right breast pocket, highest award is closest to the heart. Highest Lowest Four Awards Highest Appendix G Lowest Three Awards Lowest Highest Two Awards Lowest Highest Reviewed 05/08 Revised 10/17 Reviewed 10/18 Revised 11/19 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

UNIFORM STANDARDS of the LONE STAR GRAND COMMANDERY ORDER of the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR (PRINCE HALL AFFILIATED)
UNIFORM STANDARDS Of the LONE STAR GRAND COMMANDERY ORDER of the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR (PRINCE HALL AFFILIATED) To: R: E: Grand Commander Ronald Gerac, In turn: The Uniform Committee of the Lone Star Grand Commandery, Order of the Knights Templar of the Jurisdiction of Texas. Submitted November 2011 TO: All Grand Commandery Officers, Eminent Commanders, Generalissimos, Captain Generals, and Sir Knights of their Constituent Commanderies Subject: Uniform Codes Rational: All Sir Knights within the jurisdiction of the Lone Star Grand Commandery pledged to obtain their full uniform within two (2) years of joining the Order. If you have not done so and it has been more than two (2) years since you were dubbed a Knight Templar, you are in violation of your pledge to the Lone Star Grand Commandery. Addendum: edict 20110213-02; The first three constitutionally-elected officers of a constituent Commandery, namely the Eminent Commander, Generalissimo, and Captain-General, must, within ninety (90) days of their election, secure (or be in the process of securing) a regulation uniform to include chapeau, dress uniform, sword, sword belt, and buff gloves. Should one of these officers not be in right standing with this edict, said officer shall be subject to removal from office and replaced with a Sir Knight who shall make himself amenable to the 90-day mandate as well Dress Uniform (Frock Coat/Short Coat): Frock coat (18 buttons) Short coat (12 buttons) The Dress Uniform is a black frock coat or regular black suit coat (or nehru style stand up collar) with two rows of gold Knights Templar Buttons.
[Show full text]
State of Oklahoma
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Session of the 43rd Legislature (1991) HOUSE BILL NO. 1647 BY: HEFNER AS INTRODUCED AN ACT RELATING TO THE MILITIA; AMENDING 44 O.S. 1981, SECTION 195.5, AS AMENDED BY SECTION 8, CHAPTER 210, O.S.L. 1986 (44 O.S. SUPP. 1990, SECTION 195.5), WHICH RELATES TO AWARDS AND DECORATIONS BESTOWED UPON THE NATIONAL GUARD; PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL AWARDS, MEDALS AND RIBBONS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: SECTION 1. AMENDATORY 44 O.S. 1981, Section 195.5, as amended by Section 8, Chapter 210, O.S.L. 1986 (44 O.S. Supp. 1990, Section 195.5), is amended to read as follows: Section 195.5 The following awards and decorations are hereby created and established and shall be bestowed upon the federally recognized officers, warrant officers, and enlisted personnel of the Oklahoma National Guard under the conditions and in the manner provided in this act. (a) An Oklahoma Distinguished Service Cross which may be awarded to any eligible person who shall perform at great personal danger and risk of life or limb in the line of military duty any act of heroism designed to protect life or property or who while on active state duty during a period of martial law shall perform such acts over and beyond the call of duty which act, danger or risk he could have failed to perform or incur without being subject to censure for neglect of duty. (b) An Oklahoma Distinguished Service Medal which may be awarded to any eligible person who, as a member of the Oklahoma National Guard, shall perform unusually distinguished and meritorious service which to a marked degree is reflected in the increased efficiency and growth of the Oklahoma National Guard or which brings exceptional honor and credit to the Oklahoma National Guard and commands the attention and respect of the citizens of the state and of members of the military establishment of the United States.
[Show full text]
On the Concepts of 'Sovereign' and 'Great' Orders
ON THE CONCEPTS OF ‘SOVEREIGN’ AND ‘GREAT’ ORDERS Antti Matikkala The only contemporary order of knighthood to include the word ‘sovereign’ in its name is the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and Malta. Sovereignty is here heraldically exemplified by the Grand Master’s use of the closed crown. Its Constitutional Charter and Code explains that the order ‘be- came sovereign on the islands of Rhodes and later of Malta’, and makes the follow- ing statement about its sovereignty: ‘The Order is a subject of international law and exercises sovereign functions.’1 However, the topic of this article is not what current scholarship designates as military-religious orders of knighthood, or simply military orders, but monarchical orders. To quote John Anstis, Garter King of Arms,2 a monarchical order can be defined in the following terms: a Brotherhood, Fellowship, or Association of a certain Number of actual Knights; sub- jected under a Sovereign, or Great Master, united by particular Laws and Statutes, peculiar to that Society, not only distinguished by particular Habits, Ensigns, Badges or Symbols, which usually give Denomination to that Order; but having a Power, as Vacancies happen in their College, successively, of nominating, or electing proper Per- sons to succeed, with Authority to assemble, and hold Chapters. The very concept of sovereignty is ambiguous. A recent collection of essays has sought to ‘dispel the illusion that there is a single agreed-upon concept of sovereignty for which one could offer of a clear definition’.3 To complicate the issue further, historical and theoretical discussions on sovereignty, including those relating to the Order of Malta, concentrate mostly on its relation to the modern concept of state, leaving the supposed sovereignty of some of the monarchical orders of knighthood an unexplored territory.
[Show full text]
Green Ribbon Schools: Highlights from the 2018 Honorees
Highlights from the 2018 Honorees U.S. Department of Education - 400 Maryland Ave, SW - Washington, DC 20202 www.ed.gov/green-ribbon-schools - www.ed.gov/green-strides Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 7 Honorees at a Glance .............................................................................................. 13 2018 Director’s Award .............................................................................................. 14 2018 U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools ................................... 15 Alabama ..................................................................................................................... 15 Legacy Elementary School, Madison, Ala. .............................................................. 15 Woodland Forrest Elementary School, Tuscaloosa, Ala. ........................................ 17 Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, Ala. ..................................................... 19 California .................................................................................................................... 23 Monterey Road Elementary School, Atascadero, Calif. ........................................... 23 Top of the World Elementary School, Laguna Beach, Calif. .................................... 26 Maple Village Waldorf School,
[Show full text]
The Striking of Proof and Pattern Coins in the Eighteenth Century
THE STRIKING OF PROOF AND PATTERN COINS IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY G. P. DYER AND P. P. GASPAR THIS paper records the results of a study of proof, pattern, and currency pieces of the early milled period and of an examination of the surviving tools and dies from that period held by the Royal Mint. These two lines of inquiry began separately, but as the work progressed their inter-relationship became clear and the two finally merged, enabling us not only to formulate objective criteria for the identification of proof strikings but also to postulate a method of production for proof and pattern pieces different from that employed for ordinary coins. In this period proof and pattern coins are, of course, very often readily distinguish- able from their currency counterparts. Patterns by definition present few problems of identification, while on proofs the details of the design are normally more sharply defined and the field is generally superior as a result of the more careful polishing of the surface of the dies. Moreover, in the case of proofs of gold and silver coins, the edge is likely to be plain instead of grained or lettered. Closer examination, however, shows that these visible differences on patterns and proofs can be supplemented by others, less obvious perhaps but arguably more significant for the light they throw on the method of production. The most important of these additional differences relates to the lettering. Attention has often been drawn to the fact that on currency pieces letters with uprights have bases that are frequently fishtailed or bifurcated, and indeed this type of lettering is regarded as one of the most characteristic features of the eighteenth-century coinage.1 By contrast, on proofs and patterns the letter bases are usually square and unindented and seldom show the exaggerated serifs associated with currency pieces.
[Show full text]
The Livery Collar: Politics and Identity in Fifteenth-Century England
The Livery Collar: Politics and Identity in Fifteenth-Century England MATTHEW WARD, SA (Hons), MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy AUGUST 2013 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, lS23 7BQ www.bl.uk ANY MAPS, PAGES, TABLES, FIGURES, GRAPHS OR PHOTOGRAPHS, MISSING FROM THIS DIGITAL COPY, HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED AT THE REQUEST OF THE UNIVERSITY Abstract This study examines the social, cultural and political significance and utility of the livery collar during the fifteenth century, in particular 1450 to 1500, the period associated with the Wars of the Roses in England. References to the item abound in government records, in contemporary chronicles and gentry correspondence, in illuminated manuscripts and, not least, on church monuments. From the fifteenth century the collar was regarded as a potent symbol of royal power and dignity, the artefact associating the recipient with the king. The thesis argues that the collar was a significant aspect of late-medieval visual and material culture, and played a significant function in the construction and articulation of political and other group identities during the period. The thesis seeks to draw out the nuances involved in this process. It explores the not infrequently juxtaposed motives which lay behind the king distributing livery collars, and the motives behind recipients choosing to depict them on their church monuments, and proposes that its interpretation as a symbol of political or dynastic conviction should be re-appraised. After addressing the principal functions and meanings bestowed on the collar, the thesis moves on to examine the item in its various political contexts.
[Show full text]
Annual Report and Accounts for 2014
The Learned Society of Wales Report and Accounts for the period 1 August 2014 to 31 July 2015 Registered Charity Number 1141526 Company Number 7256948 The Learned Society of Wales (a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee) Report and Accounts for the period 1 August 2014 to 31 July 2015 Contents Page Legal and Administrative Information 1 Structure, Governance and Management 2 Objectives and Activities, Achievements and Performance 5 Financial Review 10 Responsibilities of the Council 11 Declaration 12 Auditors’ Report 13 Statement of Financial Activities 15 Balance Sheet 16 Notes Forming Part of the Accounts 17 Legal and Administrative Information Charity Name: The Learned Society of Wales Welsh name of Charity: Cymdeithas Ddysgedig Cymru Charity Registration Number: 1141526 Company Number: 7256948 Registered Office and operational address: The University Registry King Edward VII Avenue Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NS Website: www.learnedsociety.wales Members of Council (Charity Trustees and Directors) Professor Jane Aaron (until 20 May 2015) Professor Roger Owen Professor David Boucher Professor Ole Petersen Professor Michael Charlton Professor Keith G Robbins Professor Kenneth Dyson Professor Alan Shore (until 20 May 2015) Professor Dianne Edwards Professor Keith Smith Professor David Evans Professor M Wynn Thomas Professor Robert Evans Professor John Tucker Sir Roger Jones Professor Peter Wells Sir Emyr Jones Parry Professor Robin H Williams Professor John Wyn Owen Professor John Jones (from 20 May 2015) Professor Judith Phillips (from 20 May 2015) Professor Nancy Edwards (from 22 October 2014) Except where indicated, the persons listed above served as Charity Trustees and Directors throughout the period covered by this Report (1 August 2014 to 31 July 2015) and occupied these positions on the date (13 January 2016) on which the Report was approved.
[Show full text]
Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding
REPORT OF THE BLUE RIBBON PANEL ON PUBLIC PENSION PLAN FUNDING AN INDEPENDENT PANEL COMMISSIONED BY THE SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES FEBRUARY 2014 © 2014© 2014 Society Society of of Actuaries, Actuaries, Schaumburg, Schaumburg, Illinois Illinois Table Of Contents Letter From The Panel Chair 5 Summary Of Recommendations 6 Panel Charter 10 Background 12 Funding Principles 19 Recommendations 21 Endnotes 34 References 36 Appendices I: Overview Of Panel Process 39 II: Sample Historical Disclosures 46 III: Standardized Contribution Benchmark 48 IV: Sample Stress Testing Disclosure 52 V: Glossary 60 3 © 2014 Society of Actuaries, Schaumburg, Illinois Letter From The Panel Chair To the Society of Actuaries’ (SOA’s) Board of Directors and Members: On behalf of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pension Plan Funding (“the Panel”), I am pleased to submit the attached report of our findings and recommendations. Consistent with our charter, the Panel focused on the development of recommendations for strengthening public plan funding. From my perspective, the Panel’s principal objective was to identify effective and practical recommendations for enhancing the ability of plan sponsors to keep the contractual benefit promises that they negotiated with plan participants. The timing of this undertaking was appropriate as the information considered by the Panel suggests that the financial condition of public pension trusts has weakened during the last 15 years, while its exposure to future financial and other risks has increased, possibly materially. Self-reported funded ratios, the history of sponsors’ payment of recommended contributions, greater levels of investment risk taking, and funding analyses that may not have adequately captured the changing economic outlook support this view and have been noted in the Panel’s report.
[Show full text]
Creation of Order of Chivalry Page 0 of 72
º Creation of Order of Chivalry Page 0 of 72 º PREFACE Knights come in many historical forms besides the traditional Knight in shining armor such as the legend of King Arthur invokes. There are the Samurai, the Mongol, the Moors, the Normans, the Templars, the Hospitaliers, the Saracens, the Teutonic, the Lakota, the Centurions just to name a very few. Likewise today the Modern Knight comes from a great variety of Cultures, Professions and Faiths. A knight was a "gentleman soldier or member of the warrior class of the Middle Ages in Europe. In other Indo-European languages, cognates of cavalier or rider French chevalier and German Ritter) suggesting a connection to the knight's mode of transport. Since antiquity a position of honor and prestige has been held by mounted warriors such as the Greek hippeus and the Roman eques, and knighthood in the Middle Ages was inextricably linked with horsemanship. Some orders of knighthood, such as the Knights Templar, have themselves become the stuff of legend; others have disappeared into obscurity. Today, a number of orders of knighthood continue to exist in several countries, such as the English Order of the Garter, the Swedish Royal Order of the Seraphim, and the Royal Norwegian Order of St. Olav. Each of these orders has its own criteria for eligibility, but knighthood is generally granted by a head of state to selected persons to recognize some meritorious achievement. In the Legion of Honor, democracy became a part of the new chivalry. No longer was this limited to men of noble birth, as in the past, who received favors from their king.
[Show full text]
Sir Knights of Indiana Honoring Sir Knight Paul A
Lawrence J. Williams, R.E.G.C. Grand Commandery Knights Templar Of Indiana November 2017 To be removed from this mailing list send a reply with “Remove” in the subject line and you will immediately be removed. www.indianaknightstemplar.com Sir Knights of Indiana Honoring Sir Knight Paul A. Cole, KCT, PGC at his Masonic Memorial Service October 23rd, 2017 in Shelbyville, Indiana November Birthdays: Phillip W. Stroud, 11/1 Lady Donna Clutter, widow of Willard R. Clutter, PGC, PDC, 11/1 Rev. Janice Yvonne Akers-Du Bois, wife of Brian Du Bois, 15, 11/2 Burnell R. Davis, 11/4 Lady Jane Stevens, wife of John V. Stevens, KCT, PGC, 11/4 Lloyd E. Atterson, Sr., PGHP, 67, 11/5 Rudell “Sarge” Wilburn, PMIGM, 3, 11/5 Lady Vicki Deutscher, wife of Larry Deutscher, PWGP, 12, 11/5 Rodney A. Mann, MWGM, 11/6 Lady Deborah Bolinger, wife of James Bolinger, GC, 11/6 Bradley C. Wooten, 39, 11/8 Lady Ruth Wilburn, wife of Sarge Wilburn, 11/8 Lady Lynnette Begue, wife of Kurt Begue, Aide, Webmaster, 11/9 Dwight E. Lanman, Jr., KCT, PGC, 11/14 David C. Willoughby, 65, 11/16 Lady Barbara Kester, wife of Mark A. Kester, Sr., Rec. 16, 11/15 Christopher L. Hodapp, KCT, 11/17 Lady Amy Frazer wife of Bruce Frazer, 67, 11/17 Michael F. Robbins, 11/19 Elijah C. Mills, 11/19 Terry L. Turner, 1, 11/22 Kevin J. Scott, 62, 11/24 Gerald W. Cook, 28, 11/25 Nathan C. Brindle, 11/26 Lady Karen Ingles, wife of George A.
[Show full text]
United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Ribbons and Medals October 2016
United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Ribbons and Medals October 2016 2 Authority to Wear Ribbons and Medals • Auxiliary uniforms are similar to those worn by Coast Guard officers. Auxiliarists may wear authorized emblems, insignia and ribbons. 3 General Information About Ribbons and Medals • Not all ribbons have a corresponding medal • Ribbons and medals are always worn in specific order of precedence • If two ribbons or medals have the same precedence level, they are worn in the order in which they were awarded • Ribbons and medals may have attachment devices for a variety of purposes including indication of subsequent awards • Auxiliarists are not authorized to wear anchors, the letters “X” and “V”, and numerals on any Coast Guard or Auxiliary ribbons. 4 Authorized Ribbons of the Auxiliary 5 Authorized Ribbons of Other Services* * Examples: some but not all. Individual Awards and Medals • CG AUXILIARY DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARD • AUXILIARY LEGION OF MERIT • PLAQUE OF MERIT • AUXILIARY MERITORIOUS SERVICE AWARD (“O” Device Option) • AWARD OF OPERATIONAL MERIT • AUXILIARY COMMENDATION AWARD • AUXILIARY ACHIEVEMENT AWARD (“O” Device Option) • AUXILIARY COMMANDANT LETTER OF COMMENDATION (“O” Device Option) 5/16” Gold Star = Additional Award 5/16” Silver Star = 5 Gold Stars 7 Coast Guard Sustained Auxiliary Service Award • SUSTAINED AUXILIARY SERVICE AWARD (750 Hours) 3/16” Bronze Star = Additional Award 3/16” Silver Star = 5 Bronze Stars (sixth award) Bronze Hourglass = 7,500 Hours Gold Hourglass = 15,000 Hours Silver Hourglass = 25,000
[Show full text]
19101 Through the Supporting Installation
Department of the Army – Medal of Heroism Medal of Heroism Medal of Heroism, is a U.S. military decoration awarded by the Department of the Army (DA) to a JROTC cadet who performs an act of heroism. The achievement must be an accomplishment so exceptional and outstanding that it clearly sets the individual apart from fellow students or from other persons in similar circumstances. The performance must have involved the acceptance of danger and extraordinary responsibilities, exemplifying praiseworthy fortitude and courage. Nominations will be: • Initiated by the SAI based on achievements described in a above. Such acts may have been accomplished while on or off the institution property. • Submitted by the SAI to the appropriate subordinate commander concerned for approval or disapproval. A DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) or a letter will be used. Statements of eyewitnesses (preferably in the form of certificates, affidavits, or sworn statements), extracts from official records, sketches, maps, diagrams, or photographs will be attached to support and amplify stated facts. The final approval authority is the Brigade Commander. Requisitions for the medals may be submitted to Defense Personnel Support Center, ATTN: DPSC–T, 2800 South 20th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19101 through the supporting installation. Presentation of this award will be made during an appropriate ceremony by a general officer or other senior officer of the Active Army. Department of the Army – Superior JROTC Cadet Superior Cadet - JROTC Superior Cadet Decoration, is an U.S. military decoration awarded by DA and limited to one outstanding cadet in each LET level in each JROTC institution. To be considered eligible for this award, an individual must be: • A JROTC cadet.
[Show full text]