Oil Shale, Part II: Geology and Mineralogy of the Oil Shales of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah and Wyoming

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oil Shale, Part II: Geology and Mineralogy of the Oil Shales of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah and Wyoming Article Oil shale, part II: geology and mineralogy of the oil shales of the Green River formation, Colorado, Utah and Wyoming JAFFE, Felice Reference JAFFE, Felice. Oil shale, part II: geology and mineralogy of the oil shales of the Green River formation, Colorado, Utah and Wyoming. Colorado School of Mines Mineral Industries Bulletin, 1962, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 1-16 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:152772 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 b ~L~ ~· () ~~ ,~Ov. (i) ~ COLORADO SCHOOL OF MIN~JT\-:-~----~1 Mi n e r a I/I nd u s t r, ie s B.u 11 e.t i n The Colorado School of Mines Mineral Industries Bulletin is published every other month by the Colorado School of Mines Research Foundation to inform those interested in the mineral industry regarding the elements of the geology and mineral resources, mining operations, metal markets, production statistics, economics, and other aspects of the mineral industry. This publication may be obtained for a yearly subscription charge af $1.00 for the six issues pub- lished from July through May of the following year. Past issues still in print may be had for 25c each. Address your order to the Department of Publica- tions, Colorado School af Mines, Golden, Colorado. Entered as second class matter at the Post Office at Golden, Colorado, under Act of Congress, July 16, 1894. Copyright 1962 by The Colorado School of Mines. All rights reserved. This publication or any part of it may not be reproduced in any form without written permission of the Colorado School af Mines. Volume 5 May, -1962 Number 3 OIL SHALE Part II GEOLOGY AND MINERALOGY OF THE OIL SHALES OF THE GREEN RIVER FORMATION, COLORADO, UTAH AND WYOMING By Felix C. Jaffe' Colorado School of Mines Research Foundation, Inc. Colden, Colorado INTRODUCTION been, up to now, a major deterrent for the establishment of a healthy domestic oil-shale industry. To a certain extent, oil In a previous Mineral i11d11stties Bulletin on oil shale shales also suffer from the conservative approach which has (Volume 5, Number 2) the nature of different oil shales and been prevailing in the mining industry in recent years and, related, oil-yielding, sedimentary roc:ks was described. Known indeed, a certain amount of courage is required to enter into oil-shale rese1·ves of the major districts were indicated, and a completely new field, in which many technical, pxoduction, oil-shale CAl>loitation in several countries of the Eree world and and marketing problems am as yet unsolved. Howeve1·, exploita- the communist bloc was briefly reviewed. In this study, of tion of oil shale is becoming increasingly competitive, as general nature, the conclusion was reached that oil shales are domestic peb·oleum reserves are being rapidly depleted and a raw material of signilicant and rapidly increasing importance, exploration and production costs are constantly rising. and that they can be mined, retorted, and refined under favor- able economic conditions. Quantitative predictions of future production of oil from oil shales liave been disproved to such an extent that it does In the United States, past exploitation efforts have been not seem advisable to repeat similar errors in this study. The only of a sporadic and limited nature, and at present no in- fact remains that truly enormous reserves of oil shale are in dustrial activity can be reported in this field . However, this existence, and that the inception of their commercial exploita- country occupies a privileged position for future production tion is only a matter of time. In Colorado, in particular, oil of oil from oil shale, since the largest known .reserves of the shale is definitely a major resource of the future. world are concentrated in the western part of its territory, The purpose of this Bulletin is to gather in one single principally in the Green River formation. Over 16,000 square publication the essential information published on the Green miles are underlain by oil shale.~ in the states of Colorado, Utah River oil shales since the classical investigations of Bradley, and Wyoming. The Piceance Creek D<1sin, Colorado, is without some thirty years ago. doubt the largest single l·nown oil-shale deposit of the world. Pertinent data on other oil-shale districts will be men- The availability of sufficient quantities of oil products, at tioned, where a better understanding of the western oil-shale competitive prices, from conventional petroleum sources has field can be obtained thereby. ,I I. THE GREEN RIVER FORMATION Piceance Basin is, reservewise, the largest known oil shale deposit of the world (Jaffe', 1962). General description Each lake has its own particular sedimentation features. The Green River form::ition is composed of a sequence of For instance, trona, a naturnl sodium sesquicarbonate (Na~CO~ · predominately lacustrlne sediments, with inteifi11gering of NHC0,1• 2H~O) is found in commercial quantities onJy in the fluviatile sediments. It extends over approximately 16,400 Wyoming trona district which lies in western Sweetwater square miles, and is some 1,500 to 2,000 feet thick. Several County. In this area, beds of solid trona are known to extend thin analcitized tuff layers are intercalated in this sequence. over 1,000 square miles, but onJy a part of the area, approxi- The formation lies confonnably over the Tertiary Wasatch mately 100 square miles, is of potential commercial value formation, which is composed principally of fluviatiJe secli- (Mannion and Jefferson, 1962). According to Fahey (1962), ments, and, in turn, is overlain conformably by younger forma- the b·ona of the Green River formation will probably be a tiol')s, i:n which a fluviatile type of deposition is again pre- sow·ce of soda ash for hundreds of years1 • Each square mile of dom.i1iant. It is of interest to note that oil shnles of the other b·ona bed contains more than 16 million tons of trona, from major districts of the world were generally deposited in a whicl1 it is estimated that about nine million tons of soda ash marine environment. can be produced, after deducting for impurities in the trona Three different lakes were in existence at apl.)l'Oximately bed, and the incomplete recovery by room-and-pilJar mining. the same time in the lacustrine phase of the Green River Current production is estimated at 900,000 tons of soda ash formation: Lake Uinta, the largest one, lying south of the per year, which corresponds to approximately 15 percent of Uinta Mountains, Gosiute Lake, in Wyoming, and a third, as the total domestic nntmal and synthetic soda ash production. yet unnamed lake, tl1at occupied a relatively small basin in Recent mineralogical studies have confirmed subtle differ- the exb·eme west of Wyoming, now refened to as the Fossil ences of sedimentation and environment in the different basins Syncline (fig. 1). Lake Uinta. was subdivided into two basins: of the Green River formation (Milton and others, 1960). the large Uinta Basin in Utah, and the relatively small Piceance Creek Basin in Colorado. These two basins were The topography of the region occupied by the Green connected by a narrow isthmus, which was in existence at least River formation, in Colorado and Utah in particular, is char- at the time of the Parachute Creek member deposition (Bradley, acterized by high steep-sided plateaus, with steep outward- 1948). fncing escarpments several thousand feet high. Precipitous cliffs are common. The streams which flow over the rocks of During Eocene times, the Uinta-Piceance Basin was a the Green R.iver formation have cut nanow, steep-sided valleys subsiding basin filled with sediments derived from actively or deep canyons with abrupt walls. Vegetation other than rising positive areas suuounding it, notably the Uinta Moun- ground cover is frequently scant, except for tl1e canyon bottoms. tains. It bas been considered as a b·ue zeugogeosyncline (Jones, However, spruce and aspen forests are in existence on many 1957). mesas. Two areas in the Green River formation have been de- Swface occupied by the Green River formation: scribed in detail recently. The Cathedral Bluff area is situated State and County Square miles in the western part of the Piceance Creek Basin, and occupies Colorado an area of approximately 385 square miles. (Donnell and Garfield, Mesa and Rio Blanco................ 2,592 others, 1953). The Bonanza-Dragon area is located in the Utah Uinta Basin, on the Colorado-Utah boundary (Uintah County, Uintah, Duchesne, Carbon and Wasatch 4,680 Wyoming Utah, and Rio Blanco County, Colorado) . It occupies an area Uinta, Sweetwater and Lincoln................ 9,192 of approximately 500 square miles. Many veins in this area are filled with gilsonite, which is a particular variety of Total .................. .............................. 16,464 asphaltite. In fact, most of the gilsonite veins of the Uinta Source of data: Belser, 1949. Basin are within the Bonanza-Dragon area (Barb and Ball, In comparison, the Estonian oil-shale field, which has been 1944; Hunt and others, 1954; Cashion and Brown, 1956; in exploitation since 1918, only occuoies an area of approxi- Pruitt, 1961). Gilsonite is mined underground by hydraulic jet mately 1,400 square miles (von Winkler, 1930; Luts, 1938). cutting and the slurry is transp01ted by a 72-mile long pipe line The Lothian oil-shale field, Scotland, is still much smaller. It to the refining plant near Grand Junction, Colorado (Lenhardt, covers an area of approximately 100 square miles ( Greensroith, 1958; Baker, 1959). 1957). Oil-shale mines have been in ex.istence in Scotlru1d for over a century. The three Green River formation lakes are characterized by similar pattems of evolution.
Recommended publications
  • Barite (Barium)
    Barite (Barium) Chapter D of Critical Mineral Resources of the United States—Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply Professional Paper 1802–D U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Periodic Table of Elements 1A 8A 1 2 hydrogen helium 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lithium beryllium boron carbon nitrogen oxygen fluorine neon 6.94 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 sodium magnesium aluminum silicon phosphorus sulfur chlorine argon 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B 8B 11B 12B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.06 35.45 39.95 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 potassium calcium scandium titanium vanadium chromium manganese iron cobalt nickel copper zinc gallium germanium arsenic selenium bromine krypton 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.93 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.64 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.79 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 rubidium strontium yttrium zirconium niobium molybdenum technetium ruthenium rhodium palladium silver cadmium indium tin antimony tellurium iodine xenon 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.96 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 cesium barium hafnium tantalum tungsten rhenium osmium iridium platinum gold mercury thallium lead bismuth polonium astatine radon 132.9 137.3 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 192.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (209) (210)(222) 87 88 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Flotation of Witherite from Calcite Using Potassium Chromate As a Depressant
    Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 55(2), 2019, 565-574 Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing ISSN 1643-1049 http://www.journalssystem.com/ppmp © Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Received May 31, 2018; reviewed; accepted September 2, 2018 Selective flotation of witherite from calcite using potassium chromate as a depressant Yangshuai Qiu 1, Lingyan Zhang 1,2, Xuan Jiao 1, Junfang Guan 1,2, Ye Li 1,2, Yupeng Qian 1,2 1 School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China 2 Hubei Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Processing & Environment, Wuhan 430070, China Corresponding author: [email protected] (Lingyan Zhang) Abstract: Witherite has been widely used as an industrial and environmental source of barium, with calcite being the primary associated carbonate mineral. However, few studies have been conducted to effectively concentrate witherite from barium ores. In this work, with the treatment of potassium chromate (K2CrO4) and sodium oleate (NaOL), witherite was selectively separated from calcite through selective flotation at different pH conditions. In addition, contact angle, Zeta potential, adsorption and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements were performed to characterize the separation mechanisms. The results demonstrated that NaOL had a strong collecting ability for both witherite and calcite; nevertheless, witherite could be effectively selected from calcite with the highest recovery at pH 9 in the presence of K2CrO4. From the XPS measurements, NaOL and K2CrO4 were found to be primarily attached to the surfaces of witherite and calcite through chemisorption. The presence of K2CrO4 on the surface of calcite adversely influenced the NaOL adsorption, which could make the flotation separation efficient and successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrare D Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Minerals
    Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s G. C. Jones Department of Mineralogy The Natural History Museum London, UK and B. Jackson Department of Geology Royal Museum of Scotland Edinburgh, UK A collaborative project of The Natural History Museum and National Museums of Scotland E3 SPRINGER-SCIENCE+BUSINESS MEDIA, B.V. Firs t editio n 1 993 © 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Chapman & Hall in 1993 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1993 Typese t at the Natura l Histor y Museu m ISBN 978-94-010-4940-5 ISBN 978-94-011-2120-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2120-0 Apar t fro m any fair dealin g for the purpose s of researc h or privat e study , or criticis m or review , as permitte d unde r the UK Copyrigh t Design s and Patent s Act , 1988, thi s publicatio n may not be reproduced , stored , or transmitted , in any for m or by any means , withou t the prio r permissio n in writin g of the publishers , or in the case of reprographi c reproductio n onl y in accordanc e wit h the term s of the licence s issue d by the Copyrigh t Licensin g Agenc y in the UK, or in accordanc e wit h the term s of licence s issue d by the appropriat e Reproductio n Right s Organizatio n outsid e the UK. Enquirie s concernin g reproductio n outsid e the term s state d here shoul d be sent to the publisher s at the Londo n addres s printe d on thi s page.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborite Namgf3
    Neighborite NaMgF3 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic, pseudocubic. Point Group: 2/m 2/m 2/m. As pseudo-octahedral or pseudocubic crystals, to 3 mm, and as oblong to rounded grains. Twinning: Polysynthetic and interpenetrant, complex but poorly defined. Physical Properties: Fracture: Uneven. Hardness = 4.5 D(meas.) = 3.03(3) D( calc.) = 3.08 Optical Properties: Transparent to opaque. Color: Colorless, cream, pink, red, brown, may be zoned. Luster: Vitreous to dull, greasy. Optical Class: Isotropic, with birefringence = ~0.003. n = 1.364(2) Cell Data: Space Group: Pbnm. a = 5.352(1) b = 7.485(1) c = 7.663(2) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: South Ouray, Utah, USA. 1.918 (100), 2.71 (50) ,3.83 (35), 2.30 (25), 1.556 (25), 2.23 (18), 2.20 (13) Chemistry: (1) (2) Fe2O3 0.17 MgO 39.36 38.65 CaO 1.10 Na2O 27.02 29.71 K2O 0.77 F 54.76 54.65 H2O 0.25 - O = F2 [23.06] 23.01 Total [100.37] 100.00 (1) Ural Mountains, Russia; original total given as 100.49%; corresponds to (Na0.87K0.02)Σ=0.89 (Mg0.98Ca0.02)Σ=1.00F2.97. (2) NaMgF3. Occurrence: An authigenic mineral, formed under aluminum-deficient conditions in dolomitic oil shale (South Ouray, Utah, USA); in metamorphosed tuff and clayey carbonate sediments (Ural Mountains, Russia); in miarolitic cavities in peralkalic granite (Lake Gjerdingen, Norway); in cavities in pegmatite and hornfels in an alkalic gabbro-syenite complex (Mont Saint- Hilaire). Association: Burbankite, nahcolite, wurtzite, barytocalcite, garrelsite, pyrite, calcite, quartz (South Ouray, Utah, USA); quartz, aegirine, rhodochrosite, zircon, fluorite, gagarinite, monazite-(Ce), galena, sphalerite, molybdenite, brookite (Gjerdingen, Nordmarka, Norway).
    [Show full text]
  • A Specific Gravity Index for Minerats
    A SPECIFICGRAVITY INDEX FOR MINERATS c. A. MURSKyI ern R. M. THOMPSON, Un'fuersityof Bri.ti,sh Col,umb,in,Voncouver, Canad,a This work was undertaken in order to provide a practical, and as far as possible,a complete list of specific gravities of minerals. An accurate speciflc cravity determination can usually be made quickly and this information when combined with other physical properties commonly leads to rapid mineral identification. Early complete but now outdated specific gravity lists are those of Miers given in his mineralogy textbook (1902),and Spencer(M,i,n. Mag.,2!, pp. 382-865,I}ZZ). A more recent list by Hurlbut (Dana's Manuatr of M,i,neral,ogy,LgE2) is incomplete and others are limited to rock forming minerals,Trdger (Tabel,l,enntr-optischen Best'i,mmungd,er geste,i,nsb.ildend,en M,ineral,e, 1952) and Morey (Encycto- ped,iaof Cherni,cal,Technol,ogy, Vol. 12, 19b4). In his mineral identification tables, smith (rd,entifi,cati,onand. qual,itatioe cherai,cal,anal,ys'i,s of mineral,s,second edition, New york, 19bB) groups minerals on the basis of specificgravity but in each of the twelve groups the minerals are listed in order of decreasinghardness. The present work should not be regarded as an index of all known minerals as the specificgravities of many minerals are unknown or known only approximately and are omitted from the current list. The list, in order of increasing specific gravity, includes all minerals without regard to other physical properties or to chemical composition. The designation I or II after the name indicates that the mineral falls in the classesof minerals describedin Dana Systemof M'ineralogyEdition 7, volume I (Native elements, sulphides, oxides, etc.) or II (Halides, carbonates, etc.) (L944 and 1951).
    [Show full text]
  • The Crystal Structure of Alstonite, Baca(CO3)2: an Extraordinary Example of ‘Hidden’ Complex Twinning in Large Single Crystals
    Mineralogical Magazine (2020), 84, 699–704 doi:10.1180/mgm.2020.61 Article The crystal structure of alstonite, BaCa(CO3)2: an extraordinary example of ‘hidden’ complex twinning in large single crystals Luca Bindi1* , Andrew C. Roberts2 and Cristian Biagioni3 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Firenze, Via G. La Pira 4, I-50121 Firenze, Italy; 2Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada; and 3Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via S. Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy Abstract Alstonite, BaCa(CO3)2, is a mineral described almost two centuries ago. It is widespread in Nature and forms magnificent cm-sized crystals. Notwithstanding, its crystal structure was still unknown. Here, we report the crystal-structure determination of the mineral and discuss it in relationship to other polymorphs of BaCa(CO3)2. Alstonite is trigonal, space group P31m, with unit-cell parameters 3 a = 17.4360(6), c = 6.1295(2) Å, V = 1613.80(9) Å and Z = 12. The crystal structure was solved and refined to R1 = 0.0727 on the σ c basis of 4515 reflections with Fo >4 (Fo) and 195 refined parameters. Alstonite is formed by the alternation, along , of Ba-dominant and Ca-dominant layers, separated by CO3 groups parallel to {0001}. The main take-home message is to show that not all structure determinations of minerals/compounds can be solved routinely. Some crystals, even large ones displaying excellent diffraction quality, can be twinned in complex ways, thus making their study a crystallographic challenge. Keywords: alstonite, carbonate, barium, calcium, crystal structure, twinning (Received 11 June 2020; accepted 25 July 2020; Accepted Manuscript published online: 29 July 2020; Associate Editor: Charles A Geiger) Introduction b = 17.413(5), c = 6.110(1) Å and β = 90.10(1)°, with a unit-cell volume 12 times larger than the orthorhombic cell proposed by Alstonite, BaCa(CO ) , is polymorphous with barytocalcite, para- 3 2 Gossner and Mussgnug (1930).
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Group
    MINERALS SORTED BY MINERAL GROUP Most minerals are chemically classified as native elements, sulfides, sulfates, oxides, silicates, carbonates, phosphates, halides, nitrates, tungstates, molybdates, arsenates, or vanadates. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). NATIVE ELEMENTS (DIAMOND, SULFUR, GOLD) Native elements are minerals composed of only one element, such as copper, sulfur, gold, silver, and diamond. They are not common in Kentucky, but are mentioned because of their appeal to collectors. DIAMOND Crystal system: isometric. Cleavage: perfect octahedral. Color: colorless, pale shades of yellow, orange, or blue. Hardness: 10. Specific gravity: 3.5. Uses: jewelry, saws, polishing equipment. Diamond, the hardest of any naturally formed mineral, is also highly refractive, causing light to be split into a spectrum of colors commonly called play of colors. Because of its high specific gravity, it is easily concentrated in alluvial gravels, where it can be mined. This is one of the main mining methods used in South Africa, where most of the world's diamonds originate. The source rock of diamonds is the igneous rock kimberlite, also referred to as diamond pipe. A nongem variety of diamond is called bort. Kentucky has kimberlites in Elliott County in eastern Kentucky and Crittenden and Livingston Counties in western Kentucky, but no diamonds have ever been discovered in or authenticated from these rocks. A diamond was found in Adair County, but it was determined to have been brought in from somewhere else. SULFUR Crystal system: orthorhombic. Fracture: uneven. Color: yellow. Hardness 1 to 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Barytocalcite Baca(CO3)2 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Barytocalcite BaCa(CO3)2 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m. Typically as elongated crystals, short to long prismatic and striated parallel [101], to 5 cm, or equant, showing large {100}, {111}, {131}, {210}, minor {001},{110}, {101}; may be massive, cleavable. Physical Properties: Cleavage: On {210}, perfect; on {001}, imperfect. Fracture: Uneven to subconchoidal. Hardness = 3.5–4 D(meas.) = 3.66–3.71 D(calc.) = 3.72 Pale yellowish to red fluorescence under SW and LW UV. Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Colorless to white, pale gray, bright to pale green, pale yellow; colorless in transmitted light. Luster: Vitreous to resinous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Orientation: Z = b; X ∧ c =64◦; Y ∧ c = –26◦. Dispersion: r> v, weak. α = 1.525 β = 1.684 γ = 1.686 2V(meas.) = 15◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 21/m. a = 8.092(1) b = 5.2344(6) c = 6.544(1) β = 106.05(1)◦ Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Alston, England. (ICDD 15-285). 3.125 (100), 3.140 (90), 4.018 (40), 4.345 (25), 2.157 (25), 2.512 (20), 2.379 (20) Chemistry: (1) (2) CO2 29.95 29.59 MgO 0.50 CaO 18.75 18.85 SrO 1.81 BaO 48.92 51.56 Total 99.93 100.00 (1) Vuoriyarvi massif, Russia; corresponds to Ba0.92Ca1.03Sr0.08Mg0.03(CO3)2.00. (2) BaCa(CO3)2. Polymorphism & Series: Trimorphous with alstonite and paralstonite. Occurrence: A relatively uncommon accessory mineral in metallic veins, formed by reaction of hydrothermal fluids with limestone; however it may be the dominant barium-bearing species; rarely in carbonatites and Alpine veins.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Earth Elements (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and Sm) from a Carbonatite Deposit: Mineralogical Characterization and Geochemical Behavior
    minerals Article Rare Earth Elements (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and Sm) from a Carbonatite Deposit: Mineralogical Characterization and Geochemical Behavior Mohamed Edahbi 1 ID , Benoît Plante 1,* ID , Mostafa Benzaazoua 1 ID , Lori Kormos 2 and Mia Pelletier 3 1 Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), 445 boul. de l’Université, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada; [email protected] (M.E.); [email protected] (M.B.) 2 XPS Consulting & Testwork Services, 6 Edison Road, Falconbridge, ON P0M1S0, Canada; [email protected] 3 Ressources Géoméga, Boucherville, QC J4B 6Y4, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 December 2017; Accepted: 2 February 2018; Published: 8 February 2018 Abstract: Geochemical characterization including mineralogical measurements and kinetic testing was completed on samples from the Montviel carbonatite deposit, located in Quebec (Canada). Three main lithological units representing both waste and ore grades were sampled from drill core. A rare earth element (REE) concentrate was produced through a combination of gravity and magnetic separation. All samples were characterized using different mineralogical techniques (i.e., quantitative evaluation of minerals by scanning electron microscopy (QEMSCAN), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy with X-ray microanalysis (SEM-EDS)) in order to quantify modal mineralogy, liberation, REE deportment and composition of REE-bearing phases. The REE concentrate was then submitted for kinetic testing (weathering cell) in order to investigate the REE leaching potential. The mineralogical results indicate that: (i) the main REE-bearing minerals in all samples are burbankite, kukharenkoite-Ce, monazite, and apatite; (ii) the samples are dominated by REE-free carbonates (i.e., calcite, ankerite, and siderite); and (iii) LREE is more abundant than HREE.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Matter in Coal - Tang Xiuyi
    COAL, OIL SHALE, NATURAL BITUMEN, HEAVY OIL AND PEAT – Vol. I -Mineral Matter in Coal - Tang Xiuyi MINERAL MATTER IN COAL Tang Xiuyi Department of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Huainan Institute of Technology, China Keywords: Minerals, Mineral matter, Terrigenous, detritus, Authigenic minerals, Syngenetic minerals, Epigenetic minerals, Low-temperature ash, Tonstein, Trace elements, Organic association, Organometallic complex, Macerals Clay, minerals, Kaolinite, Quartz, Pyrite,Calcite, Dolomite, Siderite, Ankerite, Coalbed gas, Oxid minerals, Hydoxide minerals, Sulfide minerals, Carbonate minerals. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Minerals in coal 2.1 Minerals identified in coal 2.2 Occurrence of minerals in coal 2.3 Modes of formation for minerals in coal 2.4 Common minerals in coal 2.4.1 Clay minerals 2.4.2 Oxide and hydroxide minerals 2.4.3 Sulfide minerals 2.4.4 Carbonate minerals 2.4.5 Other common minerals 3. Trace elements in coal 3.1 Trace elements identified in coal 3.2 Occurrence modes of trace element in coal 4. Origin of mineral matter in coal 5. Methods of analysis and determination of mineral matter in coal 6. Significance of research on mineral matter in coal Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS Mineral matter in coal includes minerals and other inorganic materials in, and associated with,SAMPLE macerals. There are more CHAPTERSthan 150 species of minerals already identified in coal. However, the species of common minerals found in most coals are few. Clay minerals are spread most widely and are of the highest content. Relatively common minerals found are quartz, pyrite, calcite, dolomite, siderite, and ankerite, etc. Other minerals are seldom found in coal.
    [Show full text]
  • New Occurrences from the Postmasburg Manganese Field, Northern Cape Province, South Africa
    981 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 53, pp. 981-990 (2015) DOI: 10.3749/canmin.1500063 TOKYOITE, As-RICH TOKYOITE, AND NOÉLBENSONITE: NEW OCCURRENCES FROM THE POSTMASBURG MANGANESE FIELD, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA GELU COSTIN Department of Geology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa Department of Earth Science, MS-126 Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77005, USA § BRENTON FAIREY AND HARILAOS TSIKOS Department of Geology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa ARNOLD GUCSIK Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa ABSTRACT Samples of manganese-rich rock containing two compositional varieties of tokyoite in association with noélbensonite were retrieved from a drill core obtained from the Postmasburg area in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. The samples consist of fine-grained braunite, hematite, and hausmannite. Within this material abundant vugs are observed that are filled with witherite, baryte, and barytocalcite. In addition, As-rich tokyoite, tokyoite, and noélbensonite occur in the center of the vugs, in fine aggregates 0.1 to 1 mm in size. Individual As-rich tokyoite grains are typically 20–200 mm in size. The outer walls of the vugs are lined with microcrystalline K-feldspar, witherite, and/or sérandite. Textural evidence of the Ba-rich mineral phases in association with As-rich tokyoite suggest an epigenetic mode of formation of the observed assemblages, caused by V- and As-bearing alkali-rich fluids interacting with pre-existing Mn-rich minerals. Electron microprobe analysis (EMPA), electron backscatter diffraction analysis (EBSD), and Raman spectroscopy show that the As-rich tokyoite is a mineral belonging to the brackebuschite mineral group.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Montviel Alkaline-Carbonatite Complex By
    OREGEO-01625; No of Pages 20 Ore Geology Reviews xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Evolution of Montviel alkaline–carbonatite complex by coupled fractional crystallization, fluid mixing and metasomatism — part I: Petrography and geochemistry of metasomatic aegirine–augite and biotite: Implications for REE–Nb mineralization Olivier Nadeau a,⁎, R. Stevenson b, M. Jébrak b a Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada b Département des Sciences de la Terre et de l'Atmosphère, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, H2X 3Y7, Canada article info abstract Article history: Magmatic volatiles are critically important in the petrogenesis of igneous rocks but their inherent transience Received 31 July 2015 hampers the identification of their role in magmatic and mineralization processes. We present evidence that Received in revised form 17 September 2015 magmatic volatiles played a critical role in the formation of the 1894 Ma Paleoproterozoic Montviel alkaline– Accepted 21 September 2015 carbonatite complex, Canada, and the related carbonatite-hosted REE–Nb deposit. Field and drill core relation- Available online xxxx ships indicate that lithological units of the complex were emplaced in the following order: clinopyroxenites, Keywords: melteigites, ijolites, melanosyenites, leucosyenites, granites, lamprophyric silicocarbonatites, rare magne- Alkaline and carbonatite magmas siocarbonatites, calciocarbonatites, ferrocarbonatites, late mixed carbonatites, kimberlitic silicocarbonatites and Assimilation, fractional crystallization and polygenic breccias. Magmatic minerals within these units were systematically metasomatized. In undersaturated metasomatism silicate rocks, augite recrystallized to aegirine–augite and aegirine, plagioclase recrystallized to albite, and neph- Magmatic–hydrothermal evolution eline recrystallized with analcime, cancrinite and albite.
    [Show full text]