DOCSLIB.ORG

Dose-Dependent Effects of Lesogaberan on Reflux Measures In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dose-Dependent Effects of Lesogaberan on Reflux Measures In Miner et al. BMC Gastroenterology 2014, 14:188 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/14/188 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Dose-dependent effects of lesogaberan on reflux measures in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled study Philip B Miner Jr1*, Debra G Silberg2, Magnus Ruth3, Frank Miller4 and John Pandolfino5 Abstract Background: The γ-aminobutyric acid type B-receptor agonist lesogaberan (AZD3355) has been developed for use in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (partial responders). This study aimed to explore the dose–response effect of lesogaberan on reflux episodes in partial responders. Methods: In this randomized, single-centre, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study, partial responders taking optimised PPI therapy were given 30, 90, 120 and 240 mg doses of lesogaberan. Each dose was given twice (12 h apart) during a 24-h period, during which impedance–pH measurements were taken. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in the efficacy analysis and 27 in the safety analysis. The effect of lesogaberan on the mean number of reflux episodes was dose-dependent, and all doses significantly reduced the mean number of reflux episodes relative to placebo. Lesogaberan also dose-dependently reduced the mean number of acid reflux episodes (except the 30 mg dose) and weakly acid reflux episodes (all doses) significantly, relative to placebo. Regardless of dose, lesogaberan had a similar effect on the percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 [mean reduction: 68.5% (30 mg), 54.2% (90 mg), 65.9% (120 mg), 72.1% (240 mg); p < 0.05 except 90 mg dose]. No adverse events led to discontinuation and no serious adverse events occurred during active treatment. Conclusions: Lesogaberan inhibited reflux in a dose-dependent manner in partial responders taking optimised PPI therapy, and these effects were significant versus placebo. All lesogaberan doses were well tolerated and were not associated with clinically relevant adverse events. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01043185. Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux, Lower esophageal sphincter, GABA-B agonist, Dose–response, Clinical study Background pharmacological treatments for GERD focus on the Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is widespread, suppression of gastric acid secretion by the use of proton affecting approximately 10–20% of people in Europe and pump inhibitors (PPIs). Although PPI therapy is effective in North America [1]. The primary symptoms of GERD – most patients with GERD, approximately 20–30% continue heartburn and regurgitation – are thought to occur because to experience reflux symptoms despite PPI treatment [3]. the lower esophagus is exposed to the acid contents of the TLESRs are thought to be responsible for about 80% of stomach, predominantly as a result of transient lower reflux episodes in patients with GERD, and are therefore a esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) [2]. Current suitable target for treatment [4,5]. This strategy may be particularly appropriate for patients who have reflux symp- * Correspondence: [email protected] toms despite taking a PPI because such symptoms, when 1Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, 535 NW 9th Street, Suite 325, not attributed to suboptimal PPI therapy and/or poor PPI Oklahoma City, OK, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2014 Miner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Miner et al. BMC Gastroenterology 2014, 14:188 Page 2 of 12 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/14/188 treatment adherence, may be elicited by exposure of the have a narrow therapeutic window (such as warfarin or esophagus to weakly acid or non-acid reflux [3,6-8]. digoxin) or that could interfere with the pharmacody- The stimulation of γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptors namic effects of lesogaberan (such as baclofen or supple- (GABAB), both peripherally and centrally, has been shown ments containing GABA), alter gastrointestinal symptoms to inhibit TLESRs [9]. The GABAB agonist baclofen has (such as type 2 histamine receptor agonists) or damage been used to inhibit TLESRs and reflux episodes, both in the mucosal lining of the gastrointestinal tract (such as healthy individuals and in patients with GERD, but the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or acetylsalicylic central effects of tiredness and sleepiness have prevented acid in doses > 162 mg/day). Individuals were also ex- widespread use of this drug [10-13]. cluded if they had clinically significant disorders that The novel GABAB agonist lesogaberan (AZD3355) could interfere with the study or compromise patients’ significantly inhibits TLESRs and reflux episodes in safety (e.g. cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, meta- humans, but has been assessed only as a single 0.8 mg/ bolic, psychiatric or neurological disorders, or gastrointes- kg dose and a twice-daily 65 mg dose [14,15]. The aim tinal disorders besides GERD), or had a history of syncope, of this study was to explore the dose–response effects heart disease, malignant disease, drug addiction or abuse, of lesogaberan, relative to placebo, on reflux variables, electrolyte imbalances or severe allergic or hypersensitive and on the pharmacokinetics, and safety and tolerability reactions. Pregnant or breastfeeding women were also profiles, in patients with GERD who have symptoms excluded from the study (women of childbearing age were despite PPI therapy. required to use effective contraceptive measures). Methods Study drugs, design and ethics Study participants This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, This study was carried out at a single centre in the USA four-way crossover, phase 2a study. An outline of the study (Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research) and all design is shown in Figure 1. Patients were randomized to patients gave written, informed consent before entering receive one of 10 treatment sequences each consisting of the study. placebo and three of the four different lesogaberan doses Participants were all patients with GERD who had a par- (30, 90, 120 and 240 mg). These were given on different tial response to PPI treatment. Criteria used to identify days, each separated by a 7–28-day washout period. This this group of men and women were: a history of GERD washout period far exceeds the likely maximum duration symptoms of at least 6 months in addition to ongoing of pharmacological activity, which is conventionally esti- symptoms [defined as ≥ 3 days with at least moderate mated as five times the pharmacological half-life of a drug heartburn (burning feeling behind the breastbone) or ≥ (which, for lesogaberan, is approximately 11–13 h) [16], 3 days with at least moderate regurgitation (unpleasant meaning that at maximum only 0.01% of the peak concen- movement of material upwards from the stomach)] tration (Cmax) remains at the end of the wash-out period. reported in the 7-day recall Reflux Symptom Question- Each dose was given twice over a 24-h period in the form naire (RESQ-7) administered within 21 days of study of modified-release capsules: one taken 1 h before break- entry; continuous treatment in the 4 weeks before fast after fasting the night before, and the other taken 1 h enrolment with daily, optimized and unchanged PPI ther- before dinner. (Note that patients fasted overnight before apy, with doses according to the US label for any GERD each study period: no food after 22:00 and no fluids indication (an optimized PPI treatment is a treatment that, after 24:00.) Treatment with patients’ usual, regular and according to the investigator’sjudgement,cannotbe optimized dose of PPI was continued throughout the improved further by changing brand or dose regimen); study. and completion of 8 weeks of treatment with a PPI in The study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01043185) patients with reflux esophagitis verified by endoscopy in was designed and performed in accordance with ethical the 8 weeks before enrolment. Participants were also principles originating in the Declaration of Helsinki, required to be healthy (other than having GERD) men or and the study was consistent with guidelines of the women, aged 18–70 years, with a body mass index (BMI) International Conference on Harmonisation and Good of 18.5–35.0 kg/m2, and with clinically normal physical Clinical Practice, regulatory requirements, and the findings and laboratory values at the pre-entry visit. In AstraZeneca policy on bioethics and human biological addition, participants had to have a PPI prescription with samples. In addition, the University of Oklahoma Health refills covering the entire study period, or physician instruc- Sciences Centre’s Institutional Review Board approved the tions to use equivalent over-the-counter PPI medication. study protocol. The investigator obtained signed informed Patients were excluded if they had shown no improve- consent from the potential patients, assigned them unique ment in GERD symptoms during PPI therapy. Other enrolment numbers, determined patient eligibility and exclusion criteria were the concomitant use of drugs that assigned eligible patients unique randomization codes. Miner et al. BMC Gastroenterology 2014, 14:188 Page 3 of 12 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/14/188 Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4 Visit 5 Visit 6 > 21 days 7–28 days 7–28 days 7–28 days 5–10 days Pre-entry Study period 1 Study period 2 Study period 3 Study period 4 Follow-up Placebo or Placebo or Placebo or Placebo or R 30 mg or 30 mg or 30 mg or 30 mg or 90 mg or 90 mg or 90 mg or 90 mg or 120 mg or 120 mg or 120 mg or 120 mg or 240 mg 240 mg 240 mg 240 mg Figure 1 Study design.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GABA Receptors
    D Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews Review No.7 / 1-2011 GABA receptors Wolfgang Froestl , CNS & Chemistry Expert, AC Immune SA, PSE Building B - EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Phone: +41 21 693 91 43, FAX: +41 21 693 91 20, E-mail: [email protected] GABA Activation of the GABA A receptor leads to an influx of chloride GABA ( -aminobutyric acid; Figure 1) is the most important and ions and to a hyperpolarization of the membrane. 16 subunits with γ most abundant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian molecular weights between 50 and 65 kD have been identified brain 1,2 , where it was first discovered in 1950 3-5 . It is a small achiral so far, 6 subunits, 3 subunits, 3 subunits, and the , , α β γ δ ε θ molecule with molecular weight of 103 g/mol and high water solu - and subunits 8,9 . π bility. At 25°C one gram of water can dissolve 1.3 grams of GABA. 2 Such a hydrophilic molecule (log P = -2.13, PSA = 63.3 Å ) cannot In the meantime all GABA A receptor binding sites have been eluci - cross the blood brain barrier. It is produced in the brain by decarb- dated in great detail. The GABA site is located at the interface oxylation of L-glutamic acid by the enzyme glutamic acid decarb- between and subunits. Benzodiazepines interact with subunit α β oxylase (GAD, EC 4.1.1.15). It is a neutral amino acid with pK = combinations ( ) ( ) , which is the most abundant combi - 1 α1 2 β2 2 γ2 4.23 and pK = 10.43.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Subject index Note: page numbers in italics refer to fi gures, those in bold refer to tables Abbreviations used in subentries abdominal mass patterns 781–782 GERD – gastroesophageal refl ux disease choledochal cysts 1850 perception 781 IBD – infl ammatory bowel disease mesenteric panniculitis 2208 periodicity 708–709 mesenteric tumors 2210 peripheral neurogenic 2429 A omental tumors 2210 pharmacological management 714–717 ABCB1/MDR1 484 , 633 , 634–636 abdominal migrane (AM) 712 , 2428–2429 physical examination 709–710 , 710 ABCB4 abdominal obesity 2230 postprandial 2498–2499 c h o l e s t e r o l g a l l s t o n e s 1817–1818 , abdominal pain 695–722 in pregnancy 842 1819–1820 a c u t e see acute abdominal pain prevalence 695 functions 483–484 , 1813 acute cholecystitis 784 rare/obscure causes 712–713 , 712 intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy 848 acute diverticulitis 794–796 , 795 , 1523–1524 , red fl ags 713 low phospholipid-associated 1527 relieving/aggravating factors 709 cholelithiasis 1810 , 1819–1820 , 2393 acute mesenteric ischemia 2492 right lower quadrant 794 m u t a t i o n p h e n o t y p e s 2392 , 2393 a c u t e p a n c r e a t i t i s 795 , 1653 , 1667 right upper quadrant 794 progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis-3 acute suppurative peritonitis 2196 sickle cell crisis 2419 494 adhesions 713 s i t e 703 , 708 ABCB11 see bile salt export pump (BSEP) AIDS 2200 special pain syndromes 718–720 ABCC2/MRP2 485 , 494 , 870 , 1813 , 2394 , 2395 anxiety 706–707 sphincter of Oddi dysfunction 1877 ABCG2/BCRP 484–485 , 633
    [Show full text]
  • New and Future Drug Development for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    J Neurogastroenterol Motil, Vol. 20 No. 1 January, 2014 pISSN: 2093-0879 eISSN: 2093-0887 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2014.20.1.6 JNM Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility Review New and Future Drug Development for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Carla Maradey-Romero and Ronnie Fass* The Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Medical therapy remains the most popular treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Whilst interest in drug devel- opment for GERD has declined over the last few years primarily due to the conversion of most proton pump inhibitor (PPI)’s to generic and over the counter compounds, there are still numerous areas of unmet needs in GERD. Drug development has been focused on potent histamine type 2 receptor antagonist’s, extended release PPI’s, PPI combination, potassium-competitive acid blockers, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation reducers, prokinetics, mucosal protectants and esophageal pain modulators. It is likely that the aforementioned compounds will be niched for specific areas of unmet need in GERD, rather than compete with the presently available anti-reflux therapies. (J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;20:6-16) Key Words Erosive esophagitis; Gastroesophageal reflux; Heartburn; Proton pump inhibitors Most patients with GERD fall into 1 of 3 categories: non- erosive reflux disease (NERD), erosive esophagitis (EE), and Introduction Barrett’s esophagus (BE). The 2 main phenotypes of GERD, Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common con- NERD and EE, appear to have different pathophysiological and dition that develops when reflux of stomach contents cause trou- clinical characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrazeneca Lesogaberan AZD3355
    AstraZeneca AZD3355/Lesogaberan Mechanism of Action Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor B (GABAB) agonist http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2550; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/9568 2+ AZD3355 increased intracellular Ca with an EC50 of 8 nM in CHO cells transfected with human GABAB1a/2 and displaced radioactive GABA binding from rat brain membranes with an IC50 of 2 nM. In a broad enzyme and receptor screen, AZD3355 Overview (10 μM) was only found to also interact significantly with GABAA (600 more selective for GABAB) receptors. In the dog, when administered directly into the stomach, AZD3355 reduced transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), producing approximately 50% inhibition at 3 mg/kg (compound levels of about 600 times the EC50 in plasma). AZD3355 has been administered to healthy volunteers in single doses of up to 500 mg and in multiple ascending doses of up to 130 mg per day for 7 days. Clinically relevant increases in liver enzymes have been reported in two 28-day Phase 2 studies, which returned to normal values after dosing was stopped. Safety/Tolerability Preclinical studies of up to 12-month duration and lifetime bioassays in rat and mouse have been performed. Collectively they present a benign toxicity profile with no indication of hepatic effect. AZD3355 has been shown to induce decreased body weight and decreased food consumption. A dose-dependent diuretic effect was also noted in rats. In healthy volunteers, AZD3355 dosed at 0.8 mg/kg produced a 36% reduction in TLESRs at plasma compound concentrations of approximately 120 times the EC50.
    [Show full text]
  • The GABAB Receptor—Structure, Ligand Binding and Drug Development
    molecules Review The GABAB Receptor—Structure, Ligand Binding and Drug Development Linn Samira Mari Evenseth * , Mari Gabrielsen and Ingebrigt Sylte Molecular Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway; [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (I.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editor: Mercedes Alfonso-Prieto Received: 29 May 2020; Accepted: 6 July 2020; Published: 7 July 2020 Abstract: The γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABAB-R) belongs to class C of the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Together with the GABAA receptor, the receptor mediates the neurotransmission of GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). In recent decades, the receptor has been extensively studied with the intention being to understand pathophysiological roles, structural mechanisms and develop drugs. The dysfunction of the receptor is linked to a broad variety of disorders, including anxiety, depression, alcohol addiction, memory and cancer. Despite extensive efforts, few compounds are known to target the receptor, and only the agonist baclofen is approved for clinical use. The receptor is a mandatory heterodimer of the GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits, and each subunit is composed of an extracellular Venus Flytrap domain (VFT) and a transmembrane domain of seven α-helices (7TM domain). In this review, we briefly present the existing knowledge about the receptor structure, activation and compounds targeting the receptor, emphasizing the role of the receptor in previous and future drug design and discovery efforts. Keywords: GABAB receptors; orthosteric binding site; allosteric binding site; structural mechanisms; drug development; baclofen 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Abacavir Abacavirum Abakaviiri Abagovomab Abagovomabum
    A abacavir abacavirum abakaviiri abagovomab abagovomabum abagovomabi abamectin abamectinum abamektiini abametapir abametapirum abametapiiri abanoquil abanoquilum abanokiili abaperidone abaperidonum abaperidoni abarelix abarelixum abareliksi abatacept abataceptum abatasepti abciximab abciximabum absiksimabi abecarnil abecarnilum abekarniili abediterol abediterolum abediteroli abetimus abetimusum abetimuusi abexinostat abexinostatum abeksinostaatti abicipar pegol abiciparum pegolum abisipaaripegoli abiraterone abirateronum abirateroni abitesartan abitesartanum abitesartaani ablukast ablukastum ablukasti abrilumab abrilumabum abrilumabi abrineurin abrineurinum abrineuriini abunidazol abunidazolum abunidatsoli acadesine acadesinum akadesiini acamprosate acamprosatum akamprosaatti acarbose acarbosum akarboosi acebrochol acebrocholum asebrokoli aceburic acid acidum aceburicum asebuurihappo acebutolol acebutololum asebutololi acecainide acecainidum asekainidi acecarbromal acecarbromalum asekarbromaali aceclidine aceclidinum aseklidiini aceclofenac aceclofenacum aseklofenaakki acedapsone acedapsonum asedapsoni acediasulfone sodium acediasulfonum natricum asediasulfoninatrium acefluranol acefluranolum asefluranoli acefurtiamine acefurtiaminum asefurtiamiini acefylline clofibrol acefyllinum clofibrolum asefylliiniklofibroli acefylline piperazine acefyllinum piperazinum asefylliinipiperatsiini aceglatone aceglatonum aseglatoni aceglutamide aceglutamidum aseglutamidi acemannan acemannanum asemannaani acemetacin acemetacinum asemetasiini aceneuramic
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Current Pharmacological Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Gastroenterology Research and Practice Volume 2013, Article ID 983653, 12 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/983653 Review Article Current Pharmacological Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Yao-Kuang Wang,1 Wen-Hung Hsu,1,2 Sophie S. W. Wang,1,3 Chien-Yu Lu,1,4 Fu-Chen Kuo,5 Yu-Chung Su,4,6 Sheau-Fang Yang,7 Chiao-Yun Chen,3,8 Deng-Chyang Wu,1,2,3,4 and Chao-Hung Kuo1,3,4 1 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 2 Division of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 3 Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 4 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 5 Department of Health Management, I-Shou University, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 6 Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 7 Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 8 Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Correspondence should be addressed to Chao-Hung Kuo; [email protected] Received 7 May 2013; Accepted 3 June 2013 Academic Editor: Ping-I Hsu Copyright © 2013 Yao-Kuang Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a common disorder with troublesome symptoms caused by reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, has adverse impact on quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Lääkeaineiden Yleisnimet (INN-Nimet) 31.12.2019
    Lääkealan turvallisuus- ja kehittämiskeskus Säkerhets- och utvecklingscentret för läkemedelsområdet Finnish Medicines Agency Lääkeaineiden yleisnimet (INN-nimet) 31.12.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Lesogaberan, a Novel GABAB-Receptor Agonist, On
    Effect of lesogaberan, a novel GABAB-receptor agonist, on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations in male subjects Guy E Boeckxstaens, Hans Rydholm, Aaltje Lei, John Adler, Magnus Ruth To cite this version: Guy E Boeckxstaens, Hans Rydholm, Aaltje Lei, John Adler, Magnus Ruth. Effect of lesogaberan, a novel GABAB-receptor agonist, on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations in male sub- jects. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Wiley, 2010, 31 (11), pp.1208. 10.1111/j.1365- 2036.2010.04283.x. hal-00552541 HAL Id: hal-00552541 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00552541 Submitted on 6 Jan 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Effect of lesogaberan, a novel GABAB-receptor agonist, on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations in male subjects For Peer Review Journal: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Manuscript ID: APT-0981-2009.R1 Manuscript Type: Original Scientific Paper Date Submitted by the 26-Feb-2010 Author: Complete List of Authors: Boeckxstaens, Guy;
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Receptors and the Immune System
    GABA receptors and the immune system Arne Lucas ten Hoeve 3384004 Bachelor Biomedical Sciences 2011 Utrecht University Supervisor: dr. P.A.J. Henricks 1 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 3 PART 1. THE GABA SYSTEM ............................................................................................................... 3 GABA synthesis and transport ...................................................................................................... 3 GABAA receptors ........................................................................................................................... 5 Structure................................................................................................................................... 5 Function and distribution ......................................................................................................... 6 GABAB receptors ........................................................................................................................... 8 Structure and signaling ............................................................................................................ 8 Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 10 GABA and the immune system ....................................................................................................... 11 Cells
    [Show full text]
  • Lesogaberan), for the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis
    Repositioning of a Novel GABA-B Receptor Agonist, AZD3355 (Lesogaberan), for the Treatment of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Dipankar Bhattacharya Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Christine Becker Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Benjamin Readhead Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Nicolas Goossens Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Jacqueline Novik Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Maria Isabel Fiel Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Leslie P. Cousens Emerging Innovations, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, Björn Magnusson Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg Anna Backmark Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg Ryan Hicks BioPharmaceuticals R&D Cell Therapy, Research and Early Development, Cardiod Metabolism (CVRM), BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg Joel T. Dudley Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Scott L. Friedman ( [email protected] ) Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Research Article Keywords: Fibrosis, NAFLD, hepatic stellate cell, drug repurposing, informatics, therapeutics Posted Date: April 12th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-386482/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/25 Abstract Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a rising health challenge, with no approved drugs. We used a computational drug repositioning strategy to uncover a novel therapy for NASH, identifying a GABA-B receptor agonist, AZD3355 (lesogaberan) previously evaluated as a therapy for esophageal reux. AZD3355’s potential ecacy in NASH was tested in human stellate cells, human precision cut liver slices (hPCLS), and in vivo in a well-validated murine model of NASH.
    [Show full text]