DOCSLIB.ORG

U C Berkeley 2009-2019 Capital Financial Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

U C BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN NOVEMBER 2009 UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN CONTENTS Preface Executive Overview 1 Goals & Priorities 3 Life Safety 4 Campus Growth & New Initiatives 6 Intellectual Community 8 Campus Environment 9 Capital Renewal 10 Operation & Maintenance 11 Sustainable Campus 12 Capital Approval Process 15 Capital Resources 17 State Funds 19 Gift Funds 21 Campus Funds 22 Capital Program 2009-2019 25 Project Details 35 UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN PREFACE In March 2008, The Regents authorized the ‘pilot phase’ of a major reconfiguration of the capital projects approval process: the pilot phase would entail an initial test of the redesign in order to examine its logistics and impacts, prior to full implementation. In general, the new process would delegate much more authority to the campus for project approval, and would limit project-specific review by The Regents to very large and complex projects. Each campus would prepare a set of ‘framework’ plans that outline its capital investment strategy and physical design approach. Once those plans are approved by The Regents, then as long as a project meets certain thresholds, and conforms to the framework plans, it could be approved by the Chancellor, subject to a 15 day review by OP. One of these thresholds is dollar value: the currently proposed figure is $60 million or less. The framework plans for Berkeley include 3 documents: • The 2020 Long Range Development Plan provides a land use policy framework, within which projects can be prioritized and planned. • The Physical Design Framework describes the current state of the campus physical environment alongside our design objectives, and prescribes guidelines and review protocols to ensure projects in the capital plan meet the design objectives. • The 2009-2019 Capital Plan outlines both how the capital investment program would meet the campus’ academic and strategic objectives, and how the campus intends to fund the program. The Plan describes present conditions, outlines the campus’ objectives and priorities for the capital program, and details the campus’ financial strategy to meet those objectives. Like the 2020 LRDP, the 2009-2019 Capital Plan excludes University Village Albany and Richmond Field Station, as well as remote field stations and other properties lying entirely outside the City of Berkeley. UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW As the original campus of the University of California, Berkeley today The 2009-2019 Capital Plan would achieve these objectives in support of remains a leader in education, research, and public service. Over the the Berkeley Strategic Academic Plan and 2020 Long Range Development years, our performance has not only equaled but often outpaced the Plan: nation’s elite private universities, while we have also ensured a UC Life Safety. The 2009-2019 Capital Plan would replace or renovate over Berkeley education remains within reach of every deserving student. 1,300,000 gsf of space with seismic and life safety deficiencies, and would Over the past decade, this mandate has led to an increase of 14% in fall raise the percentage of space completed or underway from 66% to 81%. enrollment to keep pace with demographic trends. Campus Growth & New Initiatives. The 2009-2019 Capital Plan would But enrollment is only one of many drivers of investment at UC Berkeley. increase program space at Berkeley by over 800,000 new gsf, to New academic initiatives and continued growth in research also create accommodate program and enrollment growth as well as growth in demand for more space on and around campus. While some of this extramural research. demand can be met through renovation of existing buildings, new Intellectual Community. The 2009-2019 Capital Plan includes a major buildings are also required, particularly for programs that demand high new multi-disciplinary research complex devoted to instruction, research, performance infrastructure and other advanced features renovated space and practice in the health sciences; the redesign and renovation of Moffitt can not provide. We must strive to ensure the course of future research Library and Hearst Gymnasium as active, welcoming centers of student is driven by its value to the university and society, not by the physical life; and nearly 900 new student housing beds and up to 150 new units of constraints of the campus. faculty housing within walking distance of campus. Research is also fundamental to our mission of education as a research Renewal & Maintenance. The 2009-2019 Capital Plan would combine university: critical inquiry, analysis, and discovery are integral to the state and campus funds into an ongoing, designated fund for capital coursework. Our students expect to play an active role in research, renewal. The Plan also includes the comprehensive renewal or under the guidance of faculty who are themselves engaged in creating, not replacement of over 1,200,000 gsf of program space and nearly 700 merely imparting, new knowledge. It is a goal of the Berkeley Strategic student bed spaces. Academic Plan to integrate research-based learning into undergraduate as Campus Environment. The 2009-2019 Capital Plan proposes a special well as graduate education. To do so, we must expand the scope of our gift fund designated for the campus landscape to preserve, restore, and research programs, and must provide suitable space to house them. enhance the landscape as a place of both contemplation and interaction. But, as the oldest campus of the university, many of Berkeley’s older Sustainable Campus. The 2009-2019 Capital Plan includes the ongoing buildings are unable to meet modern standards for life safety, power implementation of the campus Strategic Energy Plan as well as the campus systems, climate and vibration controls, and safety and environmental objective to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2014. protocols. Moreover, the entire campus has been transformed by the Tables A1 and A2 summarize the capital investment program, with revolution in information technology: the infrastructure to support high projects organized by type of project and type of use, respectively. A performance networks has become a necessity in every discipline. detailed year-by-year breakdown of the capital program is presented in the section ‘Capital Program 2009-2019’. 1 UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Table A1. Projects by Type ($000) Proj Cost Table A2. Projects by Use ($000) Proj Cost Const Begins CCCI 5565 Const Begins CCCI 5565 Seismic Replacement Instruction & Research Campbell Hall Replacement 2010-2011 87,400 West Energy Research Facility 2009-2010 143,800 New Berkeley Art Museum 2010-2011 191,000 East Energy Research Facility 2010-2011 54,400 2223 Fulton Seismic Demolition 2013-2014 3,000 Campbell Hall Seismic Replacement 2010-2011 87,400 Lower Sproul Project TBD TBD Community Health Campus # 1 2011-2012 100,800 Seismic Renovation Chang-Lin Tien Center #2 2011-2012 50,000 King Union Seismic Retrofit 2009-2010 7,900 Tolman Hall Seismic Renovation 2012-2013 133,900 Eshleman Hall Partial Retrofit 2009-2010 1,200 2223 Fulton Demolition 2013-2014 3,000 2111 Bancroft Partial Retrofit 2009-2010 2,200 Community Health Campus # 2 2015-2016 88,200 Memorial Stadium Seismic Renovation 2010-2011 321,000 Lewis Hall Seismic Renovation 2015-2016 38,500 Greek Theater Partial Retrofit 2010-2011 4,000 Mulford Hall Seismic Renovation 2016-2017 52,700 Tolman Hall Seismic Renovation 2012-2013 133,900 Dwinelle Annex Seismic Renovation 2016-2017 4,700 Old Art Museum Seismic Renovation 2015-2016 83,600 Hearst Gym Seismic Renov/Expansion 2017-2018 98,200 Lewis Hall Seismic Renovation 2015-2016 38,500 Gateway Building (Capital Lease) 2010-2011 * 60,500 Mulford Hall Seismic Renovation 2016-2017 52,700 Lab Surge Facility 2015-2016 TBD Dwinelle Annex Seismic Renovation 2016-2017 4,700 I & R Support Hearst Gym Seismic Renov/Expansion 2017-2018 98,200 New Berkeley Art Museum 2010-2011 191,000 Lab Surge Facility 2015-2016 TBD Moffitt Library Renovation 2011-2012 55,000 Other Renovation Old Art Museum Seismic Renovation 2015-2016 83,600 Moffitt Library Renovation 2011-2012 55,000 Student Life Bowles Res Hall Renovation 2012-2013 41,700 King Union Seismic Retrofit 2009-2010 7,900 Stern Res Hall Renovation 2014-2015 37,100 Greek Theater Partial Retrofit 2010-2011 4,000 Kerr Campus Renovation # 3 2015-2016 29,000 2111 Bancroft Partial Retrofit 2009-2010 2,200 Other New Facilities Eshleman Hall Partial Retrofit 2009-2010 1,200 West Energy Research Facility 2009-2010 143,800 Lower Sproul Project TBD TBD East Energy Research Facility 2010-2011 54,400 Housing Gateway Building (Capital Lease) 2010-2011 * 60,500 Anna Head West Student Housing 2010-2011 69,900 Anna Head West Student Housing 2010-2011 69,900 Smyth Faculty Apartments 2011-2012 57,700 Community Health Campus # 1 2011-2012 100,800 Bowles Res Hall Renovation 2012-2013 41,700 Chang-Lin Tien Center #2 2011-2012 50,000 Stern Res Hall Renovation 2014-2015 37,100 Smyth Faculty Apartments 2011-2012 57,700 Kerr Res Campus Renovation # 3 2015-2016 29,000 Community Health Campus # 22015-2016 88,200 Ellsworth Student Housing 2016-2017 88,000 Ellsworth Student Housing 2016-2017 88,000 Athletics Downtown Parking Facility TBD TBD Memorial Stadium Seismic Renovation 2010-2011 321,000 Infrastructure & In-Year Parking Capital Renewal 106,500 Downtown Parking Facility TBD TBD Strategic Energy Projects 24,900 Infrastructure & In-Year Intracampus Communication System 7,400 Capital Renewal 106,500 Other Campus Projects < $5M 147,000 Strategic Energy Projects 24,900 Campus Landscape Fund 25,000 Intracampus Communication System 7,400 2,216,200 Other Campu sProjects < $5M 147,000 List excludes projects expected to start construction prior to 2009-2010 Campus Landscape Fund 25,000 * Capital lease includes payments within timeframe of 2009-2019 Capital Plan 2,216,200 2 UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN GOALS & PRIORITIES Capital investment at Berkeley is guided by the Strategic Academic Plan and • Capital Renewal.
Recommended publications
  • The Green Book a Collection of USCA History

    The Green Book a Collection of USCA History

    The Green Book A Collection of U.S.C.A. History Guy Lillian and Krista Gasper 1971, 2002 Last Edited: March 26th, 2006 ii Contents I Cheap Place to Live 1 1 1933–1937 5 2 1937–1943 27 3 1943–1954 37 4 1954–1963 51 5 1964–1971 75 II Counterculture’s Last Stand 109 6 Introduction 113 7 What Was the U.S.C.A.? 115 8 How Did Barrington Hall Fit In? 121 9 What Were the Problems? 127 10 What is Barrington’s Legacy? 153 III Appendix 155 A Memorable Graffiti from Barrington Hall 157 B Reader Responses 159 iii iv CONTENTS About This Book The Green Book is a compilation of two sources. The first, Cheap Place to Live, was completed in 1971 by Guy Lillian as part of a U.S.C.A. funded project during the summer of 1971. The second, Counterculture’s Last Stand, was completed in 2002 by Krista Gasper as part of her undergraduate studies at Berkeley. Additional resources can be found at: • http://www.barringtonhall.org/ - A Barrington Hall web site run by Mahlen Morris. You can find a lot of pictures and other cool stuff here. • http://www.usca.org/ - The official U.S.C.A. web site. • http://ejinjue.org/projects/thegreenbook/ - The Green Book homepage. Warning: This book is not intended to be a definitive, com- plete and/or accurate reference. If you have any comments, suggestions or corrections, please email them to [email protected]. John Nishinaga Editor v vi CONTENTS Part I Cheap Place to Live 1 Introduction and Acknowledgments This history of the University Students Cooperative Associa- tion (U.S.C.A.) was funded through a grant by the Berkeley Consumers Cooperative to the U.S.C.A.
  • Edwards Stadium

    Edwards Stadium

    The University of California, Berkeley Edwards Stadium Historic structure report The University of California, Berkeley Edwards Stadium HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT Contents IntroductIon .................................................................................07 descrIptIon & condItIons assessment ...................65 purpose and scope ................................................................. 10 site and Landscape .................................................................66 subject of this study ............................................................. 10 Landscape Around the stadium .......................................67 Methodology .................................................................................11 Landscape inside the stadium ..........................................75 exterior Description ................................................................78 HIstorIcal context ..................................................................17 interior Description ..................................................................87 early History of Berkeley: 1820-1859 ...............................18 Materials and Features ...........................................................92 college of california: 1860-1868 ........................................19 condition ......................................................................................99 early physical Development of the Berkeley campus ..................................................................... 20 analysIs of HIstorIcal
  • Records of the Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley, 1952-[Ongoing]

    Records of the Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley, 1952-[Ongoing]

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3d5nb07z No online items Guide to the Records of the Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley, 1952-[ongoing] Processed by The Bancroft Library staff University Archives University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: 510) 642-2933 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/BANC/UARC © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. CU-149 1 Guide to the Records of the Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley, 1952-[ongoing] Collection number: CU-149 University Archives University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: 510) 642-2933 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/BANC/UARC Finding Aid Author(s): Processed by The Bancroft Library staff Finding Aid Encoded By: GenX © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Records of the Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley Date: 1952-[ongoing] Collection Number: CU-149 Creator: University of California, Berkeley. Office of the Chancellor Extent: circa 200 boxes Repository: The University Archives. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: 510) 642-2933 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/BANC/UARC Abstract: The Records of the Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley, 1952-[ongoing], includes records for the chancellorships of Clark Kerr, Glenn T. Seaborg, Edward W. Strong, Martin Meyerson, Roger Heyns, and Albert H. Bowker.
  • Higher Education in Brazil: the Expansion of Public 3-Year

    Higher Education in Brazil: the Expansion of Public 3-Year

    Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.1.11 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY http://cshe.berkeley.edu/ ONE UNIVERSITY: THE EVOLUTION OF AN IDEA January 2011 Patricia A. Pelfrey Center for Studies in Higher Education Berkeley, California Copyright 2011 Patricia A. Pelfrey ABSTRACT The one-university idea—that the University of California is a single institution whose campuses are united in the pursuit of a common mission and common standards of quality—has been a guiding organizational principle since UC President Robert Gordon Sproul first articulated it in the 1930s. This paper examines the origins of the one-university idea in the Sproul era, the role it has played in UC’s institutional development through waves of decentralization and campus expansion, and whether it remains relevant today. We are building one great university in California. Let no small mind direct you along the paths of suspicion, distrust, or jealousy. President Robert Gordon Sproul to the students of UCLA, September 27, 1932 President Sproul’s admonition to UCLA’s students came at a sensitive moment in the history of the University of California. In 1932 the Los Angeles campus—long fought for by southern California citizens and interest groups, long delayed by University leaders in the north, and only recently settled in the hills of Westwood where it stands today—had recently made UC the nation’s first multicampus university.1 UCLA was a fledgling institution at that point, very much in the shadow of its distinguished older sibling four hundred miles away at Berkeley. Sproul’s remark was an attempt to lift morale and instill a sense of solidarity between north and south.
  • The Richard Aoki Case: Was the Man Who Armed the Black Panther Party an FBI Informant?

    The Richard Aoki Case: Was the Man Who Armed the Black Panther Party an FBI Informant?

    THE RICHARD AOKI CASE: WAS THE MAN WHO ARMED THE BLACK PANTHER PARTY AN FBI INFORMANT? by Natalie Harrison A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences with a Concentration in History Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, Florida April 2013 THE RICHARD AOKI CASE: WAS THE MAN WHO ARMED THE BLACK PANTHERS AN FBI INFORMANT? by Natalie Harrison This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. Christopher Strain, and has been approved by the members of her supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ____________________________ Dr. Christopher Strain ___________________________ Dr. Mark Tunick ____________________________ Dr. Daniel White ____________________________ Dean Jeffrey Buller, Wilkes Honors College ____________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank, first and foremost, Dr. Strain for being such a supportive, encouraging and enthusiastic thesis advisor – I could not have done any of this had he not introduced me to Richard Aoki. I would also like to thank Dr. Tunick and Dr. White for agreeing to be my second readers and for believing in me and this project, as well as Dr. Hess for being my temporary advisor when I needed it. And finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for all their support and for never stopping me as I rattled on and on about Richard Aoki and how much my thesis felt like a spy movie.
  • 100 Strong Sproul Plaza 4Corners Christian Fellowship Sproul Plaza

    100 Strong Sproul Plaza 4Corners Christian Fellowship Sproul Plaza

    100 Strong Sproul Plaza 4Corners Christian Fellowship Sproul Plaza Acts2Fellowship Sproul Plaza Adventist Christian Fellowship Sproul Plaza AFX Dance Sproul Plaza Aletheia Collective Sproul Plaza Alpha Epsilon Zeta Sproul Plaza Alpha Kappa Psi Sproul Plaza Alpha Sigma Phi Sproul Plaza Ambassadors of Opportunity at Berkeley Sproul Plaza Ambience Sproul Plaza American Medical Student Association Sproul Plaza American Red Cross at Cal Sproul Plaza American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Sproul Plaza Ark College Group Sproul Plaza Armenian Student Association Sproul Plaza Ascend Sproul Plaza Asian American Pacific Islander Health Research Group (AAPIHRG-S) Sproul Plaza ASUC SUPERB Sproul Plaza ASUC Sustainability Team (STeam) Sproul Plaza Atheists and Skeptics Society at Berkeley Sproul Plaza Azaad Sproul Plaza Ballet Company at Berkeley Sproul Plaza BARE Magazine Sproul Plaza Bay Area Environmentally Aware Consulting Network (BEACN) Sproul Plaza BEAM (Berkeley Engineers and Mentors) Sproul Plaza Bears for UNICEF Sproul Plaza BERCU Sproul Plaza Berkeley ABA Sproul Plaza Berkeley Advertising Agency Sproul Plaza Berkeley Anti-Trafficking Coalition Sproul Plaza Berkeley Business Society Sproul Plaza Berkeley College Republicans Sproul Plaza Berkeley Consulting Sproul Plaza Berkeley Cru Sproul Plaza Berkeley Forum Sproul Plaza Berkeley Indonesian Student Association (BISA) Sproul Plaza Berkeley Model UN Sproul Plaza Berkeley National Organization for Women Sproul Plaza Berkeley Organization for Animal Advocacy Sproul Plaza Berkeley Political
  • Adjustments to 2020-21 Capital Outlay Proposal

    Adjustments to 2020-21 Capital Outlay Proposal

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT— OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 1111 Franklin Street, 6th Floor Oakland, California 94607-5200 510/987-9029 April 7, 2020 The Honorable Holly J. Mitchell Chair, Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Phil Ting Chair, Assembly Committee on Budget State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Ms. Keely Bosler Director of Finance State Capitol, Room 1145 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator Mitchell, Assembly Member Ting, and Director Bosler: On August 30, 2019 in accordance with Sections 92493 through 92496 of the Education Code, the University of California submitted for your review and approval the University’s 2020-21 State Capital Outlay proposal totaling $551.4 million. UC submitted detailed information on the proposal’s $300 million 2020-21 UC State Seismic Program on January 13, 2020. Based on these submissions the Department of Finance issued a preliminary approval for UC’s State Capital Outlay proposal on February 14, 2020. With Public Preschool, K-12, and College Health and Safety Bond Act of 2020 (Proposition 13) not passing, the University is requesting some adjustments to its 2020-21 State Capital Outlay proposal. As originally proposed, the $80 million 2020-21 Planning for Future State Capital Outlay program would fund preliminary plans for critical high priority State-eligible major capital projects. With the exception of the San Diego campus’ Revelle College Seismic project, these projects relied on funding from Proposition 13. Accordingly, the University is proposing the revisions to the 2020-21 State Capital Outlay proposal as discussed as follows.
  • Albany Contra Costa County Oakland Emeryville

    Albany Contra Costa County Oakland Emeryville

    W G I R L IZ D ZL C Y A PE T AK C B A LV N D Y O N R City of Berkeley D WOO DH AV E N R D CCoonnttrraa CCoossttaa Historic Resources Spring Estate Sutcliff Picnic Rock County 224 County W I L D C A T C AN YO N R as of March 16, 2016 The Donald and D Helen Olsen House The MacGregor House John Hinkel Park E U F.A. Thomas House C L I D Historic Resources A Thousand Oaks V School E Landmarks / Structure of Merit Oaks Theatre Perry / Bell House T C O H L E U ³ S A S Features A OLANO AVE L A Elmer Buckman House V A T E U M L A E Everett Glass House R D E Districts A A V E Northbrae Public Ralph White House Demolished Improvements S U 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 T A T Partially Demolished R F E C R R H E S S S Feet T N T O A V E SON OMA AVE North Branch Berkeley Berkeley Municipal ICE ST Public Library EUN Rose Garden AAllbbaannyy Byrne House and Grounds, Napoleon Bonaparte John Galen ST S Howard House IN PK HO Rose Walk Captain Maury The Maybeck House Scarich Hunrick The Wallace Greenwood Samuel Hume House House Sauer House Grocery Common T OSE S R Daggett House Maybeck Cottage Carrick House La Loma Steps La Loma Park & Cottages Tuft's House #3 Former Garfield Historic District M C School Lawson G Annie Maybeck E House E House A Bonita House Berkeley Municipal V Nixon / Kennedy E Incinerator EBMUD Vine Street House Hillside School Temple of Wings Pumping Plant O X F O R Squires Block D Ashkenaz S T N ST Café E MA V IL A G I 8 A Swink House, Cottage Jensen House B 0 T Captain Boudrow L U E and Garden C A Edgar Jensen House A House H R Jefferson School S A E T N P Hillside Club A M N C T M S S I T E Daleys Scenic Tract L OS Grace North Church L Manasse Block R IA Street Improvements N Tannery Co.
  • Spring 1965 an Analytic and Autobiographical Account (2008)

    Spring 1965 an Analytic and Autobiographical Account (2008)

    one Spring 1965 An Analytic and Autobiographical Account (2008) in january 1965, in the wake of the turbulent Free Speech Movement on the Berkeley campus and the demise of its chancellor, Edward Strong, the new acting chancellor, Martin Meyerson, asked me to join his staff as a special assistant in the area of student political activity. This was the hottest seat in the chancellor’s offi ce at that moment, given the political fragility of the campus. I served eight months in that capacity until a new chancellor, Roger Heyns, was appointed and I took a scheduled sabbatical leave. Those months were a tense and uncertain period that resulted in an unsteady but palpable restoration of authority on the Berkeley campus and a few steps toward campus “normalcy.” They also constituted a period of rapid and mandatory political learning on my part and one of the most demanding seasons of my life. Over the years many colleagues have asked me to write about this important transitional period, both because it has received less attention than the historic Free Speech Movement days of late 1964 and because I had an “insider’s” point of view; now, in 2008, I have fi nally acceded to those requests. I have returned to the archives of the chancellor’s offi ce, to accounts of the events in the press, and to my personal recollections. The staff of the Bancroft Library were very helpful in supplying materials relevant to the Meyerson administration from the fi les of the chancellor’s offi ce. I also benefi ted from the research assistance of Ziza Delgado and Catherine Shepard-Haier.
  • Clark Kerr's World of Higher Education Reaches the 21St Century

    Clark Kerr's World of Higher Education Reaches the 21St Century

    Clark Kerr’s World of Higher Education Reaches the 21st Century HIGHER EDUCATION DYNAMICS VOLUME 38 Series Editor Peter Maassen, University of Oslo, Norway, and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands Johan Müller, Graduate School of Humanities, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa Editorial Board Alberto Amaral, CIPES and Universidade do Porto, Portugal Akira Arimoto, Hiroshima University, Japan Nico Cloete, CHET, Pretoria, South Africa David Dill, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA Jürgen Enders, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands Patricia Gumport, Stanford University, USA Mary Henkel, Brunel University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom Glen Jones, University of Toronto, Canada SCOPE OF THE SERIES Higher Education Dynamics is a bookseries intending to study adaptation processes and their outcomes in higher education at all relevant levels. In addition it wants to examine the way interactions between these levels affect adaptation processes. It aims at applying general social science concepts and theories as well as testing theories in the fi eld of higher education research. It wants to do so in a manner that is of relevance to all those professionally involved in higher education, be it as ministers, policy-makers, politicians, institutional leaders or administrators, higher education researchers, members of the academic staff of universities and colleges, or students. It will include both mature and developing systems of higher education, covering public as well as private institutions. For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/6037 Sheldon Rothblatt Editor Clark Kerr’s World of Higher Education Reaches the 21st Century Chapters in a Special History Editor Sheldon Rothblatt Department of History University of California Berkeley, CA, USA ISSN 1571-0378 ISBN 978-94-007-4257-4 ISBN 978-94-007-4258-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4258-1 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012941831 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 This work is subject to copyright.
  • A New Starr in Berkeley's Firmament

    A New Starr in Berkeley's Firmament

    — Not for citation without permission — A New Starr in Berkeley’s Firmament: The Dedication of the C. V. Starr East Asian Library and the Chang-Lin Tien Center for East Asian Studies Opening of the C. V. Starr East Asian Library University of California, Berkeley October 17, 2007 Berkeley, California Pauline Yu President, American Council of Learned Societies As you may know, I received my doctorate—a few years ago, now—from Stanford University, fierce rival of Berkeley at Big Game every fall. And I spent almost 10 years as dean at the University of California, Los Angeles, which has chafed at being considered this campus’s ”Southern Branch” since its founding in 1919. So why am I here? There are extremely compelling reasons for me to resist participating in the dedication of yet another splendid building on this already impossibly beautiful campus with every fiber of my being. And yet, to the contrary, I am both pleased and honored to take part in this morning’s program along with my distinguished colleagues. We’re here, after all, to celebrate something whose significance transcends even the noblest of petty rivalries, a true milestone in the academic world: the construction of the first freestanding East Asian library in North America. It will also house the Chang-Lin Tien Center for East Asian Studies, named for Chancellor Tien, who was so devoted to his engineering lab he often made it—and not his home—his first stop after returning to Berkeley from a trip. This morning we inaugurate a great laboratory for the humanities and social sciences.
  • Campus Parking Map

    Campus Parking Map

    Campus Parking Map 1 2 3 4 5 University of Mediterranean California Botanical Garden of PARKING DESIGNATION Human Garden Asian Old Roses Bicycle Dismount Zone Genome Southern Australasian South 84 Laboratory Julia African American (M-F 8am-6pm) Morgan New World Central Campus permit Rd Hall C vin Desert al 74 C Herb Campus building 86 83 Garden F Faculty/staff permit Cycad & Chinese Palm Medicinal Garden Herb Construction area 85 Garden S Student permit Miocene Eastern Mexican/ 85B Central Forest North P Botanical American American a Visitor Information n Disabled (DP) parking Strawberry Garden o Botanical r Entrance Lot Mather Californian a Redwood Garden m Entrance ic Grove Emergency Phone P Public Parking (fee required)** A l l P A i a SSL F P H V a c r No coins needed - Dial 9-911 or 911e Lower T F H e Lot L r Gaus e i M Motorcycle permit s W F a Mathematical r Molecular e y SSL H ial D R n Campus parking lot Sciences nn Foundry d a Upper te National 73 d en r Research C o RH Lot Center for J Residence Hall permit Institute r Electron Lo ire Tra e Permit parking street F i w n l p Microscopy er 66 Jorda p 67 U R Restricted 72 3 Garage entrance 62 MSRI P H Hill Area permit Parking 3 Garage level designation Only Grizzly 3 77A rrace Peak CP Carpool parking permit (reserved until 10 am) Te Entrance Coffer V Dam One way street C 31 y H F 2 Hill 77 Lot a P ce W rra Terrace CS Te c CarShare Parking 69 i Streetm Barrier V e 1 a P rrac Lots r Te o n a V Visitor Parking on-campus P V Lawrence P East Bicycle Parking - Central Campus Lot 75A