DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement of Federal Funds 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement of Federal Funds 2008 Statement of Federal Funds FISCAL YEARS 2008-2010 JANICE K. BREWER GOVERNOR STATEMENT OF FEDERAL FUNDS FISCAL YEARS 2008-2010 JANICE K. BREWER GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA Provisions for Individuals with Disabilities If individuals with disabilities require reasonable accommodation in order to use this document, please contact the Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning & Budgeting at (602) 542-5381. Janice K. Brewer GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF John Arnold Governor STRATEGIC PLANNING AND BUDGETING Director 1700 West Washington, Suite 500, Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-5381 • FAX: (602) 542-0868 March 2010 The Honorable Janice K. Brewer, Governor of Arizona and Honorable Members of the Arizona State Legislature: This annual report on federal programs administered by state agencies was prepared in accordance with A.R.S. § 41-723 and covers the state fiscal year ending June 30, 2008. Fourty-seven state agencies reported actual federal revenue or expenditure data for fiscal year 2008 as well as estimates for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The data contained in Figure 1 the following report is compiled by agencies and Federal Funding Trend Including Estimates for FY '09 and FY '10 submitted to OSPB. Specific questions on the reported Agency Estimates information should be directed to the reporting $12.0 25% Actual agency. $10.0 20% HISTORY $8.0 15% Figure 1 demonstrates the trend in actual federal funds receipts by state agencies since fiscal year 1992 $6.0 10% as well as the percentage change in receipts from year to year. It also includes agency-reported estimates for $4.0 5% Percent Change fiscal years 2009 and 2010. Total Revenue (in Billions) $2.0 0% $0.0 -5% FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 (Est.) FY 10 (Est.) State Fiscal Year The Honorable Janice K. Brewer, Governor of Arizona and Honorable Members of the Arizona State Legislature March 2010 FISCAL YEAR 2008 PICTURE The $9.37 billion received in FY 2008 represents a Figure 2 significant increase over the $8.31 billion reported for FY 2008 Federal Revenues by Area of Government fiscal year 2007. The largest increase is accounted for by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Health and Welfare (AHCCCS) due to a $477 million increase. This increase in 73.7% receipts stems from Medicaid caseload and inflationary and capitation growth. In FY 2008, AHCCCS caseloads and inflationary costs brought in $192 million more for Acute Care, $148 million for Prop 204 services, $118 million more for Long-Term Care, and $8.4 million in the Children’s Health Insurance General Government Inspection and Regulation Program (CHIP) over FY 2007. 1.1% Education 0.1% 16.5% Transportation The agency with the second largest increase was the 6.2% Natural Resources Protection and Safety 0.4% Arizona Department of Transportation at $179.4 million. 2.2% The increased amounts were primarily used for the Federal Highway system . And the third largest increase was for the Arizona Department of Economic Security at $175.5 million. The largest components of this increase can be attributed to the Food Stamp and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families programs as well as a variety of social service “safety net” programs. As Figure 2 demonstrates, Health and Welfare constitutes 73.7% or $6.9 billion of the total amount received by the state from the federal government in fiscal year 2008. Another two primary components of the federal funds total can be attributed to Transportation at 6.2% and Education at 16.5%. FUTURE OUTLOOK The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Federal Stimulus Program passed in early calendar 2009) was established to push many federal dollars through the states to create and retain jobs. The next report will demonstrate how much has been accomplished and much will be accomplished through the existence of the program. The Honorable Janice K. Brewer, Governor of Arizona and Honorable Members of the Arizona State Legislature March 2010 While the Federal Government has tightened the eligibility requirements for many entitlement programs and while there has been a slow erosion to the economy through FY 2009 and into FY 2010, the ARRA programs will significantly increase the volume of federal dollars over FY 2008. The stimulation from the federal dollars will be seen in many areas including education, public health and social services, transportation and investment in energy conservation. The information contained in this document is complied from data provided by state agencies through the normal budget process. It is anticipated that more detailed reporting from the data provided by state agencies will be disseminated in future years. Specific grant information is available for review at individual state agencies and at the Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting (contact: Norm Selover at 602-542-6198). Respectfully submitted, John Armold Director Statement of Federal Funds Table of Contents Summary Assumptions and Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Summary of Federal Revenue by Area of Government .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Federal Revenue by Agency ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary of Federal Expenditures by Area of Government .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Summary of Federal Expenditures by Agency......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Federal Funds Revenue by Function........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Federal Funds Expenditures by Function................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 Federal Operating Budget Detail Administration, Arizona Department of ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Agriculture, Department of....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Arts, Commission on the ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Attorney General – Department of Law.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 35 Commerce, Department of ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 39 Corporation Commission .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Corrections, Department of....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Criminal Justice Commission, Arizona.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Deaf and the Blind,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Police State" Climate in Arizona
    UC Berkeley Berkeley Undergraduate Journal Title Raising Arizona: How 9/11 Gave Rise to a "Police State" Climate in Arizona Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53m3r58p Journal Berkeley Undergraduate Journal, 24(1) ISSN 1099-5331 Author Umali, Lenine B Publication Date 2011 DOI 10.5070/B3241007692 Peer reviewed|Undergraduate eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Raising Arizona: How 9/11 Gave Rise to a "Police State" Climate in Arizona Lenine B. Umali INTRODUCTION: RAISING ARIZONA “I’m glad I’ve already seen the Grand Canyon,” wrote New York Times reporter Linda Greenhouse, “Because I’m not going back to Arizona as long as it remains a police state.” The Huffington Post ’s Deepak Bhargava expressed similar concerns: “So we find ourselves on the verge of converting Arizona, which has one of the largest Latino populations in America, into a police state.” All you have to do is ring up the words “Arizona police state” on Google to see the slew of allegations being hurled against the state ever since it began actively passing some of the nation’s most stringent and overtly anti-immigrant legislation. It may be that the claims are made by people with the sincere belief that there is an Arizona police state, but the accusation is an extreme one. Greenhouse herself invokes (somewhat exaggeratedly) images of Soviet Russia and apartheid South Africa in her outrage over the state of life in Arizona. 1 Yet the same Google search reveals that the amount of people alleging that Arizona has become a police state only came in droves after the world got wind of Arizona’s recent attempt to give local and state police officers the power to arrest and detain any person suspected of being undocumented.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Files: Subject Files: "A"S Abortion
    Vertical Files: Subject Files: "A"s Abortion Accountancy, Board of Adams Digging Adamsville Adjunctant General Administration, Arizona State Department of Adobe House - Florence Adobe Mountain Railroad Park - Glendale Adobe Mountain Rifle Range ADONDE African American Multicultural Museum - Scottsdale AFSCME Agriculture - Clippings Agriculture - Articles, Newsletters, Press Releases Agriculture - Clippings Agriculture and Horticulture, Arizona Commission of Agribusiness Agricultural Inspection Stations Agua Caliente 1 Agua Caliente 2 - Brochures Agua Fria Freddie Agua Fria Conservation Area Agua Fria National Monument Agua Fria Watercourse AHCCCS - Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Ahwatukee (Phoenix) AIMS Test Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Air Crash - KC135A Jet Tanker & Small Plane Collide - Perryville (March 3, 1982) Air Force Bases Air Products Chandler Air Quality Air Transportation, Aviation & Airports Airlines Crash over Grand Canyon - June 30, 1965 Airplane House - Phoenix Ajo 1 - Clippings Ajo 2 - Pamphlets, Brochures, Memos to Governor Thomas Campbell Ak-Chin Indian Community Ak-Chin Him-Dak Eco Museum - Maricopa Al Qaeda in Arizona Alamo Dam Alamo Wildlife Area (including Alamo Lake) Alexandra (Yavapai County) Alfalfa Algodones Land Grant Alhambra Village - Phoenix Alien Trust Law - Japanese Alliant Techsystems (ATK) - Mesa Alpacas Alpine Alson House - Mesa Alternate Project Delivery Method (APDM) Aho Ambassador Manor - Phoenix Amendments to U.S. Constitution by Arizona America West Arena American Association of
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JuDIcIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2 SUMMER/FALL 1999 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7462. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100- $249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25449; Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright, 01999, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • How Arizona Compares: Research Team
    • arizona’ s land and people • crime and punishment • APC car health and health ARIZONA POLICY CHOICES onment e • education • b • education • e ansportation • envir • ansportation How Arizona usiness futur usiness e • housing • tr • housing • e Compares Real Numbers and Hot Topics es JANUARY 2005 arts and cultur and arts • government • income and families • SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS / COLLEGE OF PUBLIC PROGRAMS w arizona compar es: real numbers and hot topics • ho • how arizona compar How Arizona Compares: Research Team Morrison Institute for Public Policy Morrison Institute for Public Policy is pleased to present How Arizona Rob Melnick Compares: Real Numbers and Hot Topics, the 5th edition of Arizona Policy Nancy Welch Choices. The only publications of their kind in Arizona, previous issues include: Bill Hart With Assistance From David Berman > Balancing Acts: Tax Cuts and Public Policy in Arizona Laura Davis > Growth in Arizona: The Machine in the Garden Richard Heffernon Eugene Slechta > The New Economy: A Guide for Arizona Suzanne Taylor > Five Shoes Waiting to Drop on Arizona’s Future Richard Toon Walter Valdivia Suzanne Ernstein The Arizona Policy Choices volumes seek to do more than report. They are Nielle McCammon designed to assist decision making, stimulate debate, and serve as references. Dennis Mitchell Azadeh Osanloo Cherylene Schick Arizona Policy Choices volumes have gained notice in Arizona and across Alice Willey the country for creative content and clear communication. This tradition Gwen Wisneski continues with How Arizona Compares: Real Numbers and Hot Topics. The Tracy Clark Bank One Economic Outlook Center publication offers comparative data and analysis on 10 public policy Arizona State University issues.
    [Show full text]
  • This Page Left Blank for Printing Purposes. Director’S Message
    This page left blank for printing purposes. Director’s message The mission of the Arizona Department of Public Safety is to protect human life and property by enforcing state laws, deterring criminal activity, assuring highway and public safety and provid- ing vital scientific, technical and op- erational support to other criminal jus- tice agencies. Dear Governor Napolitano and the citizens of Arizona: It is my privilege to submit to you the Arizona Department of Public Safety’s annual report for fiscal year 2006. The activities and major accomplishments contained in this report reflect the quality and dedication of the members of the Arizona Department of Public Safety. Although one of our primary missions is focused on highway safety throughout Arizona, this report demonstrates the wide array of comprehensive services and programs we provide for our citizens and those visiting the state. Members of the Arizona Department of Public Safety are dedicated professionals who take tremendous pride in their work, although their labors may go unnoticed. This report is a summary of their efforts to improve public safety and enhance the quality of life in Arizona. Thank you for your support and assistance during 2006. The Arizona Department of Public Safety will continue to be a leader in the law enforcement community; driven by our dedication to professional service, our core values, and our commitment to the citizens we serve. Sincerely, Roger Vanderpool Director Arizona Department of Public Safety 1 This page left blank for printing purposes. Table of Contents ○○○○○○○ Introduction○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Page 5 ○○○○○○○○○ Office of the Director○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Page 14 ○○○○○○○ Highway Patrol Division○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Page 20 Criminal Investigations Division○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Page 40 ○○○○○○ Agency Support Division○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Page 64 Criminal Justice Support Division○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Page 78 Department Awards○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Page 100 3 This page left blank for printing purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in Arizona: an Overview
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. CRIME IN ARIZONA: AN OVERVIEW A REPORT FROM THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS CENTER ARIZONA STATE JUSTICE PLANNING AGENCY ( ".~;.~ .. INi.l ~J~ R';~...•' CRIME IN Atfr£6NA~' ~ .,_: :; AN OVERVIEW A REPORT FROM THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS CENTER JULY 1977 Arizona State Justice Planning Agency Ernesto G. Munoz, Executive Director Statistical Analysis Center David L. Anderson, Director 5119 North 19th Avenue Sarah Weissinger, Staff Phoenix, Arizona 85015 Eunice Habets, Staff The preparation ofthls report has been financed by LEAA Discretionary Grant7S-SS-09-Q009. -1- CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................ CHARACTERISTICS OF ARIZONA. .. .. 3 Geography ............ .. 3 Population . .. 4 Tourism .................................... 4 Narcotics. .. 5 Indian Reservations .......................... 6 Community Involvement. .. 6 CRIME MEASUREMENTS .................. 9 Uniform Crime Reports. .. 9 Reported Crime and Crime Rates .............. 10 Violent Crime ............................... 11 Property Crime .............................. 12 Distribution of Violent and Property Crime ..... 13 Arrests ...................................... 14 ORGANIZED CRIME ........................ 15 Drug Trafficking ............................. 15 Land Fraud ................................. 16 REGIONAL CRIME ANALYSIS ............ 17 Region I - Maricopa County ................. 17 Region II -' Pima County .................... 18 Region III ................................... 18 Region
    [Show full text]
  • Local Immigration Prosecution: a Study of Arizona Before Sb 1070
    LOCAL IMMIGRATION PROSECUTION: A STUDY OF ARIZONA BEFORE SB 1070 * Ingrid V. Eagly Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070 has focused attention on whether federal law preempts the prosecution of state immigration crime in local criminal courts. Absent from the current discussion, however, is an appreciation of how Arizona’s existing body of criminal immigration law—passed well before SB 1070 and currently in force in the state—functions on the ground to regulate migration. Drawing on statistical data, prosecution policies, trial-level court records, and interviews with stakeholders, this Article is the first to investigate the practice of local immigration prosecution. It does so in the hotbed of immigration enforcement—Maricopa County, Arizona—through a detailed case study of the implementation of a 2005 Arizona alien smuggling law. Specifically, this Article reveals four key aspects of the national immigration system that have shifted in the face of state criminalization: the functional definition of immigration crime, the breadth of state immigration enforcement authority, the allocation of federal resources for criminal prosecution, and the exercise of executive control over immigration policy. Through this analysis, this Article shows how Arizona, despite the formal prohibition on state and local immigration regulation, has redefined and restructured the federal system for punishing immigration crime. In so doing, this Article fosters a richer and more accurate understanding of the role of the local prosecutor in immigration federalism. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report.Indd
    Arizona Town Hall Annual Report 2011 2 Pictured in this report: Front Cover: Row 1, Board Members Zoe Richmond and Gilbert Davidson at 2011 Annual Meeting; Row 2, Participants of the Energy Town Hall; Row 3, Fall Luncheon speaker Hugh Downs with students; and Fall Luncheon attendees Devan and Joanne Wastchak; Row 4, Participants of the Energy Town Hall Jennifer Frownfelter and Steven Eddy. Page 2: (left to right) Hank Peck, Michelle De Blassi, Lee Allison, Dennis Redmond Page 3: (left to right) Susan Bitter Smith, Stephen Jennings, Katosha Nakai, Scott Rhodes Page 4: (clockwise from upper left) Community Outreach Programs in Wickenburg, Kingman, and Phoenix Page 6: (clockwise from upper left) Arts Town Hall: Report editor Betsey Fahlman addresses participants at Monday’s Author’s Breakfast; Panel Chair Mike Widener joins fellow Hedgehogs in a special performance at the Plenary Session; Sue Sisley and fellow members of Panel Ocotillo discuss the issues Page 8: (clockwise from upper left) Energy Town Hall: Student participants report on the recommendations from the Youth Town Hall; Spencer Plumb proposes a change during the plenary session; Jennifer Frownfelter and fellow Participants work through proposed changes during the Plenary Session; Observer Amelia Huggins and Participant Mathew Buchwald at the Plenary Session Page 10: (clockwise from upper left) Members at 2011 Annual Meeting discuss future Town Hall topics; Members listen to speakers present potential topics; NAU President John Haeger presents potential future topic “Higher Education”;
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report
    STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Public Safety 200520052005 AnnualAnnualAnnual RRReporteporteport Janet Napolitano GOVERNOR Roger Vanderpool DIRECTOR For printing purposes, this page contains no information. Please move to the next page. The Honorable Janet A. Napolitano Governor of Arizona State Capitol 1700 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Governor Napolitano: On behalf of the Arizona Department of Public Safety, it is a privilege to present our agency’s annual report for fiscal year 2005, highlighting the Department’s achievements and contributions accomplished during this period. Although some of the activities detailed in this report occurred prior to my appointment as the DPS Director in March 2005, I take great pride in the Department’s achievements that could not have been attained without dedicated commitment by some 2,040 DPS employees, both commissioned and civilian. For 36 years, the Department has committed itself to excellence and fiscal year 2005 was not an exception. A major accomplishment was the completion of the statewide Arizona Counter Terrorism Information Center in September 2004. Of significance, DPS seized 6,497 pounds of marijuana during a single traffic stop on I-40 near the Sanders Port of Entry. DPS eradicated 7,000 marijuana plants located on Tonto National Forest. The DNA database solved 24 violent crimes in a single week (the highest number of DNA database “hits” in the history of the Arizona DNA Identification System). And the Department met the challenges impacting our department budget with the increase in fuel prices. In keeping with our mission to serve and protect the citizens of this state, in April 2005, the Department played a vital support role during the “Minuteman Project.” This was a citizens’ project along the U.S./ Mexico border to address the illegal immigration problem in southern Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Maricopa County
    OMB Approval No, 0348-0043 APPLICATION FOR 2. DATE SUBMITTED II APPLlCAnON IDENTIFIER f_ 05/16/2009 :,1 YPE OF SUBMISSION --------+-3,-D-A-T-E-R-ECE-IY-E-'D-BY S"TA-'C'rEC"-------+-S-T A-T-E-:-A-P-PLICA TION IDENTIFIER App\rcatlOD Non-Constl llctlOn _____, ________ 4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY FEDERAL IDENTIFIER ,5,1 APPLfCAN I INFORMA-T-rc3N- -,-,~,- -------- ;;::::1 Legal Name ----~'~-~Tgani~ati~nal Unit ,,-"---~~,~ County of Maricopa _._" ____,,J_ Maricopa County Justice Systems Planning :Address (city, state, and zip code) I Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on matte~-i~olving 1301 W Jefferson St this application 110th Floor Alice Bustillo iPhoenix, Arizona (602) 372,7059 ~5003-2148 ,-'---'''-------- '-c----- 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT ,16. EMPLOYER fDEI\TtFICATrON NUMBER (EIN) I 86,6000476 ~ C,unty _____ 18, TYPE OF APPLICATiON I 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY i New Bureau of Justice Assistance .1~CA':·i'ALOG OF FEDERAL-DOMESTIC ASSIST AN-C-E---+II-I. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF AP-P-L-IC-A-N-T-'S-PR-O-J-E-C-T-"~--,--,----j Number: 16,804 Maricopa County 2009 Local Justice Assistance Grant (Recovery) CFDA Title: 16.804 - Recovery Act - Justice Assistance Grants - Localities 12, AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT Maricopa County, Arizona ,---- 13, PROPOSED PROJECT I 14, CONGRESSI~NAL DlSTR!CT(S) OF 1I~a~~ate: I En;i-,-g-D-'-to-,---+-a, Applicant i b, Project . 103/01/2009 1°2/2812013 AZ02 I AZ02,AZOJ,AZ04,AZ05,AZ06,AZ07 I i I 115.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of ARIZONA Department of Public Safety 200520052005 Annualannualannual Rrreporteporteport
    STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Public Safety 200520052005 AnnualAnnualAnnual RRReporteporteport Janet Napolitano GOVERNOR Roger Vanderpool DIRECTOR For printing purposes, this page contains no information. Please move to the next page. The Honorable Janet A. Napolitano Governor of Arizona State Capitol 1700 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Governor Napolitano: On behalf of the Arizona Department of Public Safety, it is a privilege to present our agency’s annual report for fiscal year 2005, highlighting the Department’s achievements and contributions accomplished during this period. Although some of the activities detailed in this report occurred prior to my appointment as the DPS Director in March 2005, I take great pride in the Department’s achievements that could not have been attained without dedicated commitment by some 2,040 DPS employees, both commissioned and civilian. For 36 years, the Department has committed itself to excellence and fiscal year 2005 was not an exception. A major accomplishment was the completion of the statewide Arizona Counter Terrorism Information Center in September 2004. Of significance, DPS seized 6,497 pounds of marijuana during a single traffic stop on I-40 near the Sanders Port of Entry. DPS eradicated 7,000 marijuana plants located on Tonto National Forest. The DNA database solved 24 violent crimes in a single week (the highest number of DNA database “hits” in the history of the Arizona DNA Identification System). And the Department met the challenges impacting our department budget with the increase in fuel prices. In keeping with our mission to serve and protect the citizens of this state, in April 2005, the Department played a vital support role during the “Minuteman Project.” This was a citizens’ project along the U.S./ Mexico border to address the illegal immigration problem in southern Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Wellbeing in Northern Arizona: a Regional Health Equity Assessment September 6, 2017
    Advancing Wellbeing in Northern Arizona: A Regional Health Equity Assessment September 6, 2017 This report was prepared by the Northern Arizona University Center for Health Equity Research 1395 S. Knoles Dr. Flagstaff AZ, 96011 Phone: (928) 523-9188; Fax: (928) 523-4648 Email: [email protected] Report Contributors: Katharine Sanderson, MA, Heather J. Williamson, DrPH, Emery Eaves, PhD, Steven Barger, PhD, Crystal Hepp, PhD, Kristan Elwell, PhD, Ricky Camplain, PhD, Kyle Winfree, PhD, Robert T. Trotter, PhD, and Julie A. Baldwin, PhD This report was commissioned by The NARBHA Institute in partnership with the Northern Arizona Healthcare Foundation. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. vii Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Northern Arizona Regional Overview .................................................................................................. 1 Geographic Overview ................................................................................................................... 2 Demographic
    [Show full text]