DOCSLIB.ORG

Attorney General Jeff Sessions Hearing Before Senate Intelligence Committee Talking Points Still No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Trump and the White House

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attorney General Jeff Sessions Hearing Before Senate Intelligence Committee Talking Points Still No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Trump and the White House Attorney General Jeff Sessions Hearing Before Senate Intelligence Committee Talking Points Still No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Trump and the White House Topline Messaging: Attorney General Jeff Sessions agreed to meet with the Senate Intelligence Committee in an open setting, showing just how eager the Trump Administration is to cooperate with the investigative process so it can finally come to an end. AG Sessions asked for his hearing with the Senate Intel committee to be OPEN, in full view of the American public; this is the action of a public servant with nothing to hide. AG Sessions is a public servant who has dedicated his life to this country. Attempts by the Left and the media to smear his reputation by drumming up interest in meetings between himself and Russian officials, which were completely normal for a sitting senator to conduct, are baseless and have no place in civilized discourse. Both Democrats and Republicans agree - there is no evidence of collusion. With no evidence of wrongdoing, collusion, or obstruction of justice, we need to get back to the issues Americans care about, like health care, tax reform, strengthening our infrastructure and creating jobs. No Wrongdoing by President Trump: Despite an ongoing months-long investigation, President Trump has done nothing wrong and there is still no evidence of collusion of any kind between the Trump campaign and Russia. Last week Former FBI Director James Comey confirmed multiple times that President Trump or White House staff did not ask him to stop the Russia investigation. It was also confirmed President Trump was not under investigation. Where we can agree with Director Comey is that so much of the reporting on the Russia investigation is dead wrong. Director Comey admitted that he leaked his memos about the president to the press, showing extreme political shrewdness on his part to clear his name but not President Trump’s. If Director Comey was so concerned about his conversations with President Trump, why didn’t he alert anyone to his concerns. His “I don’t know” answer should raise serious questions about just how legitimate the concerns were. AG Sessions Continues to be Open, Honest, and Transparent: AG Sessions has acted with honesty, integrity, and professionalism throughout this entire process. Almost immediately after being sworn in, AG Sessions consulted with career ethics attorneys at the Department of Justice, and shortly thereafter recused himself only because of his participation in President Trump’s campaign. Since the day he submitted his recusal, the attorney general has not been briefed on or participated in any investigation within the scope of his recusal. Director Comey stated in last week’s testimony that he was “not…aware of any kind of memorandum issued from the Attorney General or the DOJ to the FBI outlining parameters of [the Attorney General’s] recusal.” However, Director Comey and other relevant officials received an email from the Attorney General’s Chief of Staff on March 2, 2017. The email detailed the Attorney General’s decision to recuse himself and the extent of this recusal. These officials and their staff were told “not to brief the Attorney General…about, or otherwise involve the Attorney General…in, any such matters described.” At no time did Director Comey inform AG Sessions of his concerns about the substance of any one-on-one conversation he had with the President, something that Director Comey himself confirmed in his sworn testimony last week. When Director Comey did raise the issue of he and his FBI staff following proper communications protocol with the White House, the attorney general responded by saying that the FBI and DOJ needed to be careful about following appropriate policies regarding contacts with the White House. Meeting with Foreign Dignitaries is Standard Procedure: U.S. Senators meet with hundreds of foreign dignitaries and ambassadors as part of their duties as Members of Congress. In fact, Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and other Russian officials have met with dozens of Democrats in recent years, including Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Claire McCaskill, Maria Cantwell, Bob Casey, Jack Reed – the list goes on and on. AG Sessions’ meetings are hardly scandalous, despite efforts by Democrats to make them so. One of the meetings was an international outreach gathering that the Obama State Department organized for 80 diplomats during the Republican National Convention. In response to criticism that AG Sessions did not disclose certain meetings - The Attorney General's staff consulted with those familiar with the disclosure process, as well as the FBI investigator handling the background check, and was instructed not to list meetings with foreign dignitaries and their staff connected with his Senate activities. Kislyak even met with staff members of the Obama administration 22 times between 2009 and 2016. DOJ has consistently denied the existence of “third meeting” at the Mayflower Hotel with the Russian ambassador since March 2, 2017. Background on United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions: At the age of 27, Jeff Sessions took his first oath, swearing to protect and uphold the Constitution when he joined the United States Army Reserve. He has proudly carried this sense of loyalty and duty to country during his time in the Army, as US Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama, as Alabama Attorney General, and as a United States Senator for 20 years. The notion that he would collude to undermine the country he has sworn to protect for almost 50 years is completely unsubstantiated. We Need More Answers on Lynch and Comey Interactions: Director Comey’s testimony was tough for a presidential administration, but not President Trump’s administration, rather President Obama’s. However, Director Comey confirmed he was very concerned about the Obama administration’s interference in the Clinton email investigation, including interference by Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Attorney General Lynch has a lot of explaining to do. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chronology Is Drawn from a Variety of Sources Including
    Chronology and Background to the Horowitz Report The chronology is drawn from a variety of sources including, principally, The Russia investigation and Donald Trump: a timeline from on-the-record sources (updated), John Kruzel, (Politifact, July 16, 2018). Spring 2014: A company, the Internet Research Agency, linked to the Kremlin and specializing in influence operations devises a strategy to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election by sowing distrust in both individual candidates and the American political structure. June 16, 2015: Donald Trump announces his candidacy for president. July 2015: Computer hackers supported by the Russian government penetrate the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer network. Summer and Fall of 2015: Thousands of social media accounts created by Russian surrogates initiate a propaganda and disinformation campaign reflecting a decided preference for the Trump candidacy. March 19, 2016: Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta, falls victim to an email phishing scam. March 2016: George Papadopoulos joins the Trump campaign as an adviser. While traveling in mid-March, Papadopoulos meets a London-based professor, Josef Mifsud, who Papadopoulos understands to have “substantial connections to Russian government officials.” March 21, 2016: Trump identifies Papadopoulos and Carter Page as members of his foreign policy team, in an interview with the Washington Post. March 29, 2016: Trump appointed Paul Manafort to manage the Republican National Convention for the Trump campaign. March 31, 2016: Following a meeting with Josef Mifsud in Italy, Papadopoulos tells Trump, Jeff Sessions, Carter Page and other campaign members that he can use his Russian connections to arrange a meeting between Trump and Putin.
    [Show full text]
  • Present at the Transformation: an Insider's Reflection on NATO
    Present at the Transformation 425 Chapter 18 Present at the Transformation: An Insider’s Reflection on NATO Enlargement, NATO-Russia Relations, and Where We Go from Here Alexander Vershbow It’s now twenty years since NATO’s first post-Cold War enlarge- ment when Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic became the 17th, 18th and 19th members of the Alliance in March 1999. This began a process that has added a total of 13 new democracies from Central and Eastern Europe to NATO’s ranks, with Northern Macedonia set to become the 30th member in 2019. NATO enlargement was only one dimension of U.S. and NATO policy at the end of the Cold War aimed at consolidating peace and security across Europe, overcoming the division of the continent im- posed by Stalin at the end of World War II and ratified at the 1945 Yalta Summit. The enlargement of NATO membership went hand in hand with the forging of a strategic partnership with Russia, formalized in the NATO-Russia Founding Act of 1997. A transformed NATO Al- liance and an institutionalized NATO-Russia partnership were envis- aged as the main pillars of a U.S.-led pan-European security system that sought to realize the vision of a Europe whole, free and at peace first articulated by President George H.W. Bush and reaffirmed by President Bill Clinton. The ensuing twenty years have witnessed a lot of second-guessing about the wisdom of the decision to open NATO to the East, with more and more critics arguing that it was the “original sin” that led to the confrontational relationship with Moscow that we are dealing with today.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:17-Cv-00163-RC Document 18-3 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 316
    Case 1:17-cv-00163-RC Document 18-3 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 316 Exhibit 1 Case 1:17-cv-00163-RC Document 18-3 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 316 Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution 6 January 2017 Case 1:17-cv-00163-RC Document 18-3 Filed 07/25/17 Page 3 of 316 Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment that has been provided to the President and to recipients approved by the President. ñ The Intelligence Community rarely can publicly reveal the full extent of its knowledge or the precise bases for its assessments, as the release of such information would reveal sensitive sources or methods and imperil the ability to collect critical foreign intelligence in the future. ñ Thus, while the conclusions in the report are all reflected in the classified assessment, the declassified report does not and cannot include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence and sources and methods. The Analytic Process The mission of the Intelligence Community is to seek to reduce the uncertainty surrounding foreign activities, capabilities, or leaders’ intentions. This objective is difficult to achieve when seeking to understand complex issues on which foreign actors go to extraordinary lengths to hide or obfuscate their activities. ñ On these issues of great importance to US national security, the goal of intelligence analysis is to provide assessments to decisionmakers that are intellectually rigorous, objective, timely, and useful, and that adhere to tradecraft standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Ambassador Michael Mcfaul1
    Testimony of Ambassador Michael McFaul1 Hearing of the House Permanent Select Committee of Intelligence Putin’s Playbook: The Kremlin’s Use of Oligarchs, Money and Intelligence in 2016 and Beyond March 28, 2019 When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the worldwide ideological struggle between communism and liberalism – in other words, freedom, democracy, capitalism – also ended. Thankfully, the ideological contest between Moscow and Washington that shaped much of world politics for several decades in the twentieth century has not reemerged. However, for at least a decade now, Russian president Vladimir Putin has been waging a new ideological struggle, first at home, and then against the West more generally, and the United States in particular. He defines this contest as a battle between the decadent, liberal multilateralism that dominates in the West and his brand of moral, conservative, sovereign values. I define this contest as one between autocracy, corruption, state domination of the economy, and indifference to international norms versus democracy, rule of law, free markets, and respect for international law. This new ideological struggle is primarily being waged not between states, but within states. At home, Putin has eroded checks and balances on executive power, undermined the autonomy of political actors, regional governments, the media, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and strengthened state ownership throughout the Russian economy. To propagate his ideas and pursue his objectives abroad, Putin has invested in several powerful instruments of influence, many of which parallel those used for governing within Russia, including traditional media, social media, the weaponization of intelligence (doxing), financial support for allies, business deals for political aims, and even the deployment of coercive actors abroad, including soldiers, mercenaries, and assassins.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 216 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ) Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-03501 ) JURY DEMAND Plaintiff, ) ) SECOND AMENDED v. ) COMPLAINT ) COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION; ) ACT (18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)) ARAS ISKENEROVICH AGALAROV; ) RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)) EMIN ARAZ AGALAROV; ) ) RICO CONSPIRACY (18 U.S.C. JOSEPH MIFSUD; ) § 1962(d)) WIKILEAKS; ) WIRETAP ACT (18 U.S.C. JULIAN ASSANGE; ) §§ 2510-22) DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.; ) ) STORED COMMUNICATIONS DONALD J. TRUMP, JR.; ) ACT (18 U.S.C. §§ 2701-12) PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR.; ) DIGITAL MILLENNIUM ROGER J. STONE, JR.; ) COPYRIGHT ACT (17 U.S.C. ) JARED C. KUSHNER; § 1201 et seq.) GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS; ) ) MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE RICHARD W. GATES, III; ) SECRETS UNDER THE DEFEND ) TRADE SECRETS ACT (18 U.S.C. Defendants. ) § 1831 et seq.) ) INFLUENCING OR INJURING ) OFFICER OR JUROR GENERALLY ) (18 U.S.C. § 1503) ) ) TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS, ) VICTIM, OR AN INFORMANT (18 ) U.S.C. § 1512) ) WASHINGTON D.C. UNIFORM ) TRADE SECRETS ACT (D.C. Code ) Ann. §§ 36-401 – 46-410) ) ) TRESPASS (D.C. Common Law) ) CONVERSION (D.C. Common Law) ) TRESPASS TO CHATTELS ) (Virginia Common Law) ) ) ) Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 216 Filed 01/17/19 Page 2 of 111 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TRESPASS TO CHATTELS (Virginia Common Law) CONVERSION (Virginia Common Law) VIRGINIA COMPUTER CRIMES ACT (Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-152.5 et seq.) 2 Case 1:18-cv-03501-JGK Document 216 Filed 01/17/19 Page 3 of 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page NATURE OF ACTION .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Policies Towards NATO
    Working paper Research Unit Russia/CIS Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Hannes Adomeit Inside or Outside? Russia’s Policies Towards NATO Paper Delivered to the Annual Conference of the Centre for Russian Studies at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) on “The Multilateral Dimension in Russian Foreign Policy,” Oslo, October 12-13, 2006, Revised December 20, 2006 FG 5 2007/01 January 2007 Working papers are papers in the subject area of a Research Unit which are not officially published by SWP. These papers are either preliminary studies that later become papers published by SWP or papers that are published elsewhere. Your comments are always welcome. INSIDE OR OUTSIDE? RUSSIA’S POLICIES TOWARDS NATO “Russia closely follows the process of NATO transformation and counts on the complete removal of direct and indirect components of its anti-Russian orientation from military planning and the political declarations of the member countries of the alliance.” (Russian Defense Ministry.)1 “We are concerned over the process of NATO expansion. This organization has been and remains a military and political bloc with all the set of threats that any formation of this type involves.” (Putin.)2 “Is it possible that Russia will ever join NATO?” Putin: “Why not? I do not rule out such a possibility. I repeat, on condition that Russia's interests are going to be taken into account, if Russia becomes a full-fledged partner.”3 The problem at issue can be stated very simply: Can Russia’s
    [Show full text]
  • The Russiagate Hysteria: a Case of Severe Russophobia
    EMBASSY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE RUSSIAGATE HYSTERIA: A CASE OF SEVERE RUSSOPHOBIA APRIL 18, 2019 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 TIMELINE OF MAIN EVENTS 7 MAIN DIPLOMATIC ACTIONS BY THE EMBASSY 20 EXAMPLES OF BASELESS ACCUSATIONS BY MEDIA 27 EXAMPLES OF GROUNDLESS ACCUSATIONS BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS 77 EXAMPLES OF GROUNDLESS ACCUSATIONS BY EXPERTS 89 DEBUNKING KEY CLAIMS OF “RUSSIGATE” 101 CONCLUSION 119 3 HYSTERIA "If American democracy is destroyed within the next generation, it will not be destroyed by the Russians or the Chinese but by ourselves, by the very means we use to defend it". Senator J. WILLIAM FULBRIGHT “American Militarism”, 1970, Epilogue “It is an attempt to lay the blame at someone else’s door. This is not our problem. The problem is in US politics… The other team lost. They are reluctant to acknowledge the mistake. It is easier to say, “We are not to blame, the Russians are to blame, they interfered in our election.” It reminds me of anti-Semitism: the Jews are to blame for everything. We know what such sentiments can lead to. They lead to nothing good. The thing to do is simply to work and think of how to get things right”. VLADIMIR PUTIN President of the Russian Federation, (in response to a question from American journalist Megyn Kelly at the plenary meeting of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, June 2, 2017) 4 “I believe that this problem is rooted in the domestic developments in the United States. We are not enjoying the current developments, but we did not start it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of U.S.–Russia Relations
    POLICY BRIEF 31 / 2020 The Future of U.S.–Russia Relations Oleg Shakirov RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL BOARD OF TRUSTEES PRESIDIUM Sergey Lavrov – Chairman Mikhail Margelov Petr Aven of the Board of Trustees Yury Osipov Igor Ivanov – President Herman Gref Sergey Prikhodko Andrey Kortunov – Director General Aleksandr Dzasokhov Anatoly Torkunov Fyodor Lukyanov Leonid Drachevsky Andrey Fursenko Igor Morgulov Aleksandr Dynkin Aleksandr Shokhin Dmitry Peskov Mikhail Komissar Igor Yurgens Konstantin Kosachev Editors: Ivan Timofeev, Ph.D. in Political Science Natalia Viakhireva, Ph.D. in Political Science Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC) is a membership-based non-profit Russian organization. RIAC’s activities are aimed at strengthening peace, friendship and solidarity between peoples, preventing international conflicts and promoting crisis resolution. The Council was founded in accordance with Russian Presidential Order No. 59-rp ”On the Creation of the Russian International Affairs Council non- profit partnership,” dated February 2, 2010. FOUNDERS Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs Interfax News Agency RIAC MISSION The mission of RIAC is to promote Russia’s prosperity by integrating it into the global world. RIAC operates as a link between the state, scholarly community, business and civil society in an effort to find solutions to foreign policy issues. The views expressed
    [Show full text]
  • The Unruly Transition
    April 25, 2017 www.citizen.org The Unruly Transition Trump’s Transition Team Failed to Curtail Influence of Lobbyists and Other Special Interests Despite Candidate’s Boisterous Promises Acknowledgments This report was written by Congress Watch Research Director Taylor Lincoln. Heath Brown, assistant professor of public policy at the City University of New York, John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center, provided expert input. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 400,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org © 2017 Public Citizen. Public Citizen The Unruly Transition he work of a presidential transition team is one of the most important facets of an T administration, even though it is not officially part of an actual presidency. Transition teams formulate policy details and perform the all-important function of vetting potential appointees to staff the next administration. Transition teams have long had quasi-governmental status. Since the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, transition teams of the president-elect have received public funding and office space. Amendments to that act in 2010 and 2015 provided funding for transition teams of presidential nominees for work prior to Election Day, and the laws formalized processes for handoffs between incoming and outgoing administrations.1 Despite the government’s role in funding transitions, laws to ensure transparency and deter conflicts of interest that cover ordinary government work generally do not apply to transition teams.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcfarland's Testimony About Russia Contacts Is Questioned
    12/6/2017 McFarland’s Testimony About Russia Contacts Is Questioned - The New York Times McFarland’s Testimony About Russia Contacts Is Questioned K.T. McFarland, President Trump’s former deputy national security adviser, during her confirmation hearing to be ambassador to Singapore in July. Gabriella Demczuk for The New York Times By Michael S. Schmidt (http://www.nytimes.com/by/michael‑s‑schmidt) and Sharon LaFraniere (http://www.nytimes.com/by/sharon‑lafraniere) Dec. 4, 2017 WASHINGTON — A leading Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee questioned on Monday whether a high‑ranking official in Donald J. Trump’s transition team had been deceptive over the summer about her knowledge of discussions between Michael T. Flynn, the former national security adviser, and a former Russian ambassador. K. T. McFarland served on the presidential transition team before becoming the White House deputy national security adviser. In July, she was questioned in writing by Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey, on whether she had ever spoken to Mr. Flynn about his contacts with Sergey I. Kislyak, who was then the Russian ambassador to Washington, before Mr. Trump took office. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/us/politics/kt-mcfarland-flynn-russia-emails-congressional-testimony.html 1/9 12/6/2017 McFarland’s Testimony About Russia Contacts Is Questioned - The New York Times “I am not aware of any of the issues or events described above,” Ms. McFarland wrote in response, sidestepping a direct answer to the question. An email exchange obtained by The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/russia‑mcfarland‑flynn‑trump‑ emails.html) indicates that Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Trump Aide's Email Draws New Scrutiny in Russia Inquiry - Cnnpolitics
    8/24/2017 Exclusive: Top Trump aide's email draws new scrutiny in Russia inquiry - CNNPolitics Exclusive: Top Trump aide's email draws new scrutiny in Russia inquiry By Manu Raju and Marshall Cohen, CNN Updated 7:48 AM ET, Thu August 24, 2017 Source: CNN Top White House official draws new scrutiny in Russia inquiry 03:40 Washington (CNN) — Congressional investigators have unearthed an email from a top Trump aide that referenced a previously unreported eort to arrange a meeting last year between Trump campaign ocials and Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to sources with direct knowledge of the matter. The aide, Rick Dearborn, who is now President Donald Trump's deputy chief of sta, sent a brief email to campaign ocials last year relaying information about an individual who was seeking to connect top Trump ocials with Putin, the sources said. The person was only identified in the email as being from "WV," which one source said was a reference to West Virginia. It's unclear who the individual is, what he or she was seeking, or whether Dearborn even acted on the request. One source said that the individual was believed to have had political connections in West Virginia, but details about the request and who initiated it remain vague. http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/23/politics/donald-trump-rick-dearborn-email-russia-investigation/index.html?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaiThe same source said Dearborn in the email appeared … 1/4 8/24/2017 Exclusive: Top Trump aide's email draws new scrutiny in Russia inquiry - CNNPolitics The same source said Dearborn in the email appeared skeptical of the requested meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Day That Set in Motion Michael Flynn's Guilty Plea
    The Washington Post Politics Inside the day that set in motion Michael Flynn’s guilty plea By Michael Kranish December 8 On the day that set in motion former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s guilty plea and cooperation with the special counsel, President-elect Donald Trump was ensconced at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla., contending with the latest news from the Obama White House. It was Dec. 29, 2016, and President Barack Obama had just imposed sanctions against Russia for its alleged interference in the election. Trump aides were trying to decide how to respond. Trump’s incoming national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, was on vacation in the Dominican Republic, so the president- elect was scheduled to be briefed by Flynn’s top deputy, Kathleen Troia “K.T.” McFarland. A crucial chain of events unspooled over the day, according to court filings, congressional documents and people familiar with the interactions: Flynn and McFarland discussed by phone that Trump’s transition team did not want Russia to escalate the situation. McFarland told other Trump advisers Flynn was reaching out to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn called the ambassador, urging Moscow not to retaliate — and Russia later surprisingly agreed. Whether Trump knew of the back channel with Kislyak and whether he urged Flynn to discuss the sanctions are questions that loom before special counsel Robert S. Mueller III as he investigates contacts between Russia and the Trump operation. Some legal experts say the special counsel could be examining whether Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak violated the Logan Act, a 1799 law that prohibits private citizens from conducting U.S.
    [Show full text]