DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Northeastern Minnesota Route Assessment and Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Northeastern Minnesota Route Assessment and Environmental North Country National Scenic Trail North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York National Park Service Draft Northeastern Minnesota Route Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior And Environmental Assessment 2 Chapter 1 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................7 1.1 Purpose and Significance of the North Country National Scenic Trail......................................7 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Route Assessment.............................................................................8 1.3 Decision to be Made...................................................................................................................8 1.4 Scoping and Public Involvement................................................................................................9 1.5 Primary Issues and Concerns....................................................................................................10 1.6 Impact Topics Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ............................................................11 1.6.1 Environmental Justice .........................................................................................................11 1.6.2 Soundscapes ........................................................................................................................11 1.6.3 Prime or Unique Farmland ..................................................................................................12 1.6.4 Northeastern Minnesota Air Quality ...................................................................................12 1.7 Availability of planning record ................................................................................................12 Chapter 2 Alternatives..........................................................................................................................13 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................13 2.2 No Action Alternative ..............................................................................................................14 2.3 Preferred Alternative ................................................................................................................14 2.3.1 Preferred Alternative Part 1-Designate Existing Trails as the route of North Country National Scenic Trail.......................................................................................................................................14 2.3.1.1 Jay Cooke State Park through Duluth to Existing Superior Hiking Trail ........................15 2.3.1.2 Superior Hiking Trail .......................................................................................................15 2.3.1.3 Border Route Trail............................................................................................................16 2.3.1.4 Kekekabic Trail ................................................................................................................16 2.3.2 Preferred Alternative-Part 2- Designate Trail Corridor for Connection to Existing Segment in Chippewa National Forest ................................................................................................................16 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Rejected-Specific Routes............................................................17 2.4.1 Mesabi Trail Corridor..........................................................................................................18 2.4.2 Echo Lake Corridor .............................................................................................................18 2.4.3 Middle Route Corridor ........................................................................................................18 2.4.4 Vermillion Lake Corridor....................................................................................................18 2.4.5 McCarthy Beach State Park to Grand Rapids .........................................................................19 2.5 Alternatives Considered but not Evaluated ..............................................................................19 Preferred Alternative Map............................................................................................................21 Chapter 3 Affected Environment........................................................................................................23 3.1 Location and Description of Preferred Alternative Route Corridor.........................................23 3.2 County Overview......................................................................................................................23 3.2.1 Aitkin County ......................................................................................................................23 3.2.3 Carlton County ....................................................................................................................23 3.2.3 Cass County.........................................................................................................................24 3.2.4 Cook County........................................................................................................................24 3.2.5 Itasca County.......................................................................................................................24 3.2.6 Lake County ........................................................................................................................24 3.2.7 St. Louis County..................................................................................................................25 3.3 Northeastern Minnesota Land Resources.................................................................................25 3.3.1 Landscape............................................................................................................................25 3.3.2 Geology ...............................................................................................................................25 3.3.3 Soils .....................................................................................................................................26 3.4 Northeastern Minnesota Water Resources .................................................................................26 3.4.1 Lake Basins .........................................................................................................................27 3 3.4.2 Wetlands..............................................................................................................................27 3.4.3 Water Quality ......................................................................................................................28 3.5 Northeastern Minnesota Visual Resources.................................................................................28 3.6 Northeastern Minnesota Biological Resources ..........................................................................28 3.6.1 Wildlife................................................................................................................................28 3.6.2 Fisheries...............................................................................................................................29 3.6.3 Threatened and Endangered Species...................................................................................29 3.6.4 State Threatened and Endangered Species..........................................................................30 3.6.5 Critical Habitat ....................................................................................................................31 3.7 Northeastern Minnesota Cultural Resources............................................................................31 3.7.1 Historical Sites and Structures.............................................................................................32 3.7.2 Number of Known Historical Districts, Sites or Structures in Project Area- Listed by County ..........................................................................................................................................32 3.8 Northeastern Minnesota Community Resources......................................................................32 3.8.1 Communities and Businesses ..............................................................................................32 3.8.2 Tourism and Hiking.............................................................................................................33 3.9 Northeastern Minnesota Land Use and Ownership..................................................................33 3.9.1 Ceded Lands ........................................................................................................................33 3.9.2 Land Values.........................................................................................................................33 3.9.3 Ownership............................................................................................................................33 3.9.4 Land Use..............................................................................................................................33 3.10 Northeastern Minnesota Recreation Resources......................................................................34 3.10.1 State Parks, State Wayside Parks, State Forests..............................................................34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness T R I P P L a N N I N G G U I D E
    BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE AREA WILDERNESS T RIP P LANNING G UIDE Your BWCAW Adventure Starts Here… Share the Experience, Peter Nelson GREAT GLACIERS carved the physical Provincial Parks and is bordered on the What’s Inside… features of what is today known as west by Voyageurs National Park. The Page 2 . Planning your BWCAW Trip the Boundary Waters Canoe Area BWCAW contains over 1200 miles of Page 2 . Superior National Forest Wilderness (BWCAW) by scraping and canoe routes, 12 hiking trails and over Recreation Alternatives gouging rock. The glaciers left behind 2000 designated campsites. This area was Page 3 . Reservation & Permit Basics Page 4 . Leave No Trace rugged cliffs and crags, canyons, gentle set aside in 1926 to preserve its primitive Page 5 . BWCAW Rules and Regulations hills, towering rock formations, rocky character and made a part of the Page 6 – 7 . Smart and Safe Wilderness shores, sandy beaches and thousands National Wilderness Preservation System Travel Page 8-9 ����������� BWCAW Entry Points of lakes and streams, interspersed with in 1964 with subsequent legislation in Page 10 . The BWCAW Past and Present islands and surrounded by forest. 1978. Page 10 . The BWCAW Act The BWCAW is a unique area Wilderness offers freedom to those Page 11 . Fire in the Wilderness located in the northern third of the who wish to pursue an experience Page 12 – 13 . Protecting Your Natural Resources Superior National Forest in northeastern of expansive solitude, challenge and Page 14 . Special Uses Minnesota. Over 1 million acres in personal connection with nature. The Page 15 . Youth Activity Page size, it extends nearly 150 miles along BWCAW allows visitors to canoe, Page 16 .
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Regions of Minnesota: Level III and IV Maps and Descriptions Denis White March 2020
    Ecological Regions of Minnesota: Level III and IV maps and descriptions Denis White March 2020 (Image NOAA, Landsat, Copernicus; Presentation Google Earth) A contribution to the corpus of materials created by James Omernik and colleagues on the Ecological Regions of the United States, North America, and South America The page size for this document is 9 inches horizontal by 12 inches vertical. Table of Contents Content Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Geographic patterns in Minnesota 1 Geographic location and notable features 1 Climate 1 Elevation and topographic form, and physiography 2 Geology 2 Soils 3 Presettlement vegetation 3 Land use and land cover 4 Lakes, rivers, and watersheds; water quality 4 Flora and fauna 4 3. Methods of geographic regionalization 5 4. Development of Level IV ecoregions 6 5. Descriptions of Level III and Level IV ecoregions 7 46. Northern Glaciated Plains 8 46e. Tewaukon/BigStone Stagnation Moraine 8 46k. Prairie Coteau 8 46l. Prairie Coteau Escarpment 8 46m. Big Sioux Basin 8 46o. Minnesota River Prairie 9 47. Western Corn Belt Plains 9 47a. Loess Prairies 9 47b. Des Moines Lobe 9 47c. Eastern Iowa and Minnesota Drift Plains 9 47g. Lower St. Croix and Vermillion Valleys 10 48. Lake Agassiz Plain 10 48a. Glacial Lake Agassiz Basin 10 48b. Beach Ridges and Sand Deltas 10 48d. Lake Agassiz Plains 10 49. Northern Minnesota Wetlands 11 49a. Peatlands 11 49b. Forested Lake Plains 11 50. Northern Lakes and Forests 11 50a. Lake Superior Clay Plain 12 50b. Minnesota/Wisconsin Upland Till Plain 12 50m. Mesabi Range 12 50n. Boundary Lakes and Hills 12 50o.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 46 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2013 Numbers Article 7 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2013 April 2013 Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota David B. MacLean Youngstown State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation MacLean, David B. 2013. "Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 46 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol46/iss1/7 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. MacLean: Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Po 104 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 46, Nos. 1 - 2 Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota David B. MacLean1 Abstract Collections of aquatic invertebrates from the Grand Portage Indian Res- ervation (Cook County, Minnesota) during 2001 – 2012 resulted in 9 families, 43 genera and 112 species of aquatic and semiaquatic Coleoptera. The Dytisci- dae had the most species (53), followed by Hydrophilidae (20), Gyrinidae (14), Haliplidae (8), Chrysomelidae (7), Elmidae (3) and Curculionidae (5). The families Helodidae and Heteroceridae were each represented by a single spe- cies. Seventy seven percent of species were considered rare or uncommon (1 - 10 records), twenty percent common (11 - 100 records) and only three percent abundant (more than 100 records).
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation
    Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation MURP Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Urban and Regional Planning Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Tom Holmes Jake Knight Darin Newman Xinyi Wu May 20, 2016 Date of oral presentation: Approval date of final paper: May 6, 2016 May 20, 2016 Capstone Instructor: Dr. Greg Lindsey, Professor Photo credit: www.flickr.com/photos/zavitkovski/6266747939/ Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation Prepared for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Tom Holmes Jake Knight Darin Newman Xinyi Wu May 20, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Greg Lindsey Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Urban and Regional Planning Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails | MURP Capstone Paper Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Project Methodology 3 2. Project Context 5 2.1. Historical DNR Trail Surveys 5 2.2. Project Purpose 7 2.3. Project Scope 7 3. Counting Methods 9 3.1. Duration 9 3.2. Visits 10 3.3. Traffic 10 3.4. Case Study 1: Differentiating Duration, Visits, and Traffic on the Gateway State Trail 12 3.5. Recommendation: Traffic Counts 13 4. Considerations for Automated Traffic Counts 15 4.1 How to Implement Automated Traffic Counts 15 4.2. Case Study 2: Gateway and Brown’s Creek State Trail AADT 17 4.3. Seven Decisions for Program Design 20 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    2011 Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2014 PROJECT TITLE: Scientific and Natural Areas Acquisition and Restoration PROJECT MANAGER: Margaret (Peggy) Booth AFFILIATION: DNR Scientific & Natural Area Program MAILING ADDRESS: 500 Lafayette Rd N, Box 25 CITY/STATE/ZIP: St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 PHONE: 651-259-5088 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.mndnr.gov/snas FUNDING SOURCE: Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund) LEGAL CITATION: M.L. 2011, First Special Session, Chp. 2, Art.3, Sec. 2, Subd. 04e APPROPRIATION AMOUNT: $1,640,000 Overall Project Outcome and Results The biologically significant 900-acre Badoura Jack Pine Forest SNA was acquired in part through appropriation. Twenty-two conservation easement baseline property reports at 11 SNAs are completed. The SNA Strategic Land Protection Plan has been completed which prioritizes places of ecological importance for protection as SNAs and by partners. Habitat restoration and enhancement actions are increasing the quality of habitat on SNAs through achieving: restoration of about 30 acres at 4 SNAs; woody invasive species control on 610 acres at 19 SNAs, herbaceous invasive species treatment on 487 acres at 33 SNAs, and installation of invasives control bootbrush kiosks at 6 SNAs; about 36 miles of burn breaks at 21 SNAs and completion of 1,190 acres of prescribed burns at 25 SNAs; and site development work (e.g. entry and boundary signs, new gates, and site cleanup) at 35 SNAs. Conservation Corps Minnesota was involved in 51 of these projects. Substantial monitoring was completed of pollinators at 10 SNAs, of snakes at 1 SNA, and of native plant communities at 2 SNAs.
    [Show full text]
  • What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H
    A publication oF the Superior Hiking TrAil AssoCiation SUmmEr 2019 What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H o im Malzhan iS the trail operations director T o for our sister trail organization the ice Age B y Fr Trail Alliance in Wisconsin. Doing business as esh T “Trail Eyes,” Tim was one of four entities the SHTA Tr hired in the fall of 2018 to evaluate and recom- ac mend renewal strategies for what we have dubbed k S mE D “The Big Bad Five,” those sections of the SHT most damaged from heavy use and old age (or both). i A Though all four evaluators—malzhan, Critical Connections Ecological Services (Jason and Amy Husveth), the north Country Trail Association, and (Continued on page 2) What the “Trail Eyes” Taught Us About the SHT (continued from cover) Great Lakes Trail Builders (Wil- lie Bittner)—did what we asked (provide specific prescriptions for the Big Bad Five), their ex- pert observations gave us much more: they shed light on the en- tire Superior Hiking Trail. In other words, what they saw on the Split Rock River loop, or the sections from Britton Peak to Oberg Mountain and Oberg to the Lutsen ski complex, or the proposed reroute of the SHT north of Gooseberry Falls State Park, were microcosms of bigger, more systemic issues with the SHT. ❚ “keep people on the Trail and water off of it.” This suc- cinct wisdom comes from Matt no bridge is not the only problem at the Split rock river loop.
    [Show full text]
  • Boarder Route Trail (BRT) BOARDER ROUTE TRAIL BRT Spurs Superior Hiking Trail !9 Campgrounds !I Parking
    Boarder Route Trail (BRT) BOARDER ROUTE TRAIL BRT Spurs Superior Hiking Trail !9 Campgrounds !i Parking Rose Lake East South Lake Clearwater Lake West Trailhead Crab Lake Topper Lake Gogebic Lake Pine Ridge Loon Lake Pine Lake Loon Lake Landing Clearwater Road McFarland Lake Crab Lake Trailhead South Lake Trailhead Portage Brook Otter Lake Trailhead East Trailhead Otter Lake 0 15 30 60 90 120 Miles ´ The Border Route Trail is a 65-mile long hiking trail that crosses the The Border Route Trail is a rugged Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) in the far northeast wilderness hiking trail that follows corner of Minnesota (Arrowhead) and follows the international border ridge-lines and the top of high cliffs between Minnesota and Ontario, Canada. It connects with the Superior wherever feasible. Therefore, hiking Hiking Trail on its eastern terminus and with the Kekekabic Trail on its the trail offers expansive views across western end at the Gunflint Trail (Cook Cty. Road 12). The closest towns the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in are Grand Marais (beginning of Gunflint Trail, County Rd 12) and Hovland Minnesota and Quetico Provincal Park (beginning of Arrowhead Trail, County Road 16). In addition to the in Canada. eastern and western termini, the Border Route Trail can be accessed through several spur and connecting trails, allowing for hiking trips ranging from short day-hikes to multiday backpacking expeditions. http://www.borderroutetrail.org/ Sources: Boarder Route Trail Association, Esri, MN DNR, BWCA photos.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Federal Recreational Trail Grant Awards
    FEDERAL RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROGRAM 2019 Funded Grants Project # Applicant Organization Project Title Project Description Type of Use Total Project Cost Award Amount To purchase groom tracks; LTB maintains 52 miles of rough 0001-19-2C Cook County Tracks for groomers terrain with multiple access points to the State trail and Motorized $26,487.84 $19,865.88 businesses for lodging, food, and fuel. To purchase one snowmobile with light bar, bumper, winch, 0004-19-2C Town of Fredenberg Arctic Cat Bearcat Purchase and rear plate to be used to perform snowmobile trail Motorized $15,299.00 $11,474.25 maintenance. Josephine Nunn Trail Reconstruction To reclaim and reconstruct a 10' wide trail, to replace existing, 0006-19-3B City of Champlin Non-motorized $87,500.00 $63,000.00 Project poor condition 25-year old asphalt trail. To purchase equipment to maintain trails and pack trails for 0007-19-2A Itasca County Maintenance equipment Motorized $25,527.41 $19,145.56 winter riding To purchase equipment for grooming early season, 120 miles 0009-19-1C Lake of the Woods County Lightweight Snowmobile Trail Groomer Motorized $35,620.00 $26,715.00 of wooded and cross-country ski trails Trail & Campground Improvement & To help maintain and improve trails and campgrounds in parks 0011-19-S Minnesota Trail Riders Association Joint $46,000.00 $34,500.00 Maintenance and forests for all users. Cross Country Ski Trail Grooming To purchase equipment to groom the four GIA ski trails with 0012-19-1A Cass County Non-motorized $35,304.00 $26,478.00 Equipment over 63km
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT Welcome to The North Country Trail Association WELCOME TO THE North Country Trail Association The North Country National Scenic Trail (NCNST) is the longest hiking path in America’s National Trails System stretching more than 4,600 miles across eight states. In 1981, the North Country Trail Association (NCTA) was incorporated as the official ‘friends’ organization of the Trail. Working alongside the National Park Service the Association is the Trail’s steward, providing experiences that celebrate nature, promote physical health and build community connections. Today, we are thousands strong. We are a united community of individuals and partners who embrace the spirit, peace, and beauty found along the Trail. TOGETHER WE... Hike it Build it Love It Photo: John Day MISSION OUR COMMUNITY’S CORE VALUES The North Country Trail Association develops, maintains, • Accountability We take ownership and responsibility for protects and promotes the North Country National Scenic our actions, policies and decisions. We engage in wise Trail as the premier hiking path across the northern tier of stewardship of public and private resources. the United States through a trail-wide coalition of volunteers • Collaboration We value the spirit of cooperation between and partners. staff, volunteers, all partners and landowners and are committed to building and maintaining this culture of VISION collaboration. Service is the backbone of our organization. Our vision for the North Country Trail is that of the premier footpath of national significance, offering a superb experience • Excellence We strive for exceptional quality and safety, for hikers and backpackers in a permanently protected both in the work we do in building and maintaining the Trail corridor, traversing and interpreting the richly diverse and in the experiences of the users of this world-class trail.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation
    NPS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service WAV 141990' National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Multiple Property Documentation Form REGISTER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Cobscook Area Coastal Prehistoric Sites_________________________ B. Associated Historic Contexts ' • The Ceramic Period; . -: .'.'. •'• •'- ;'.-/>.?'y^-^:^::^ .='________________________ Suscruehanna Tradition _________________________ C. Geographical Data See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in j£6 CFR Part 8Q^rjd th$-§ecretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. ^"-*^^^ ~^~ I Signature"W"e5rtifying official Maine Historic Preservation O ssion State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this
    [Show full text]
  • O V E R N I G H T P a D D Le O N Ly
    he map and chart on this page are intended to provide a general idea of where Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness entry points and Forest Service permit issuing stations are located on the Superior National TForest, as well as some basic information about each entry point. When planning your trip we highly BWCAW recommend that you supplement this information with maps, guidebooks, and the advice of your outfitter and/or guide, if you decide to use one. Maps and guidebooks are available from the following list of sources. A list of organizations that will assist you in locating guides and outfitters in the area you plan to visit is provided. You will find a detailed list of outfitters and guides on page 14. Eastern National Grand Marais Visitor Information Center Tower-Soudan Chamber of Commerce Maps & Publications Provides quality educational products and PO Box 1048 Box 776 Detailed canoe route maps are available services to the Superior National Forest. Grand Marais, MN 55604 Tower, MN 55790 from outfitters in communities near the 877-628-7275 888-922-5000 (218) 753-2301 • 800-869-3766 BWCAW or directly from these sources. www.easternnational.org. www.grandmarais.com www.lakevermilionchamber.com W.A. Fisher Co. Gunflint Trail Association 123 Chestnut, PO Box 1107 Area Guides PO Box 205 Info for Travel to Virginia, MN 55792 & Outfitters Grand Marais, MN 55604 Quetico (218) 741-9544 800-338-6932 www.wafishermn.com Cook Chamber of Commerce www.gunflint-trail.com Quetico Provincial Park PO Box 296, District Manager McKenzie Maps Cook, MN 55723 Lutsen-Tofte Tourism Assoc.
    [Show full text]