DOCSLIB.ORG

Turquoise Coast Island Nature Reserves

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turquoise Coast Island Nature Reserves PREFACE All national parks, conservation parks and nature reserves in Western Australia are vested in the Conservation Commission of Western Australia (Conservation Commission) and are managed on its behalf by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). CALM prepares management plans on behalf of the Conservation Commission which issues draft plans for public comment and provides final plans for approval by the Minister for the Environment. The Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (CALM Act) specifies that management plans must contain: v a statement of the policies or guidelines proposed to be followed; and v a summary of operations proposed to be undertaken. In accordance with Section 55 of the CALM Act, the term of this plan will be ten years, or until such time that the plan is superseded by a new management plan. This management plan is for the 13 island nature reserves which represent a chain of approximately 40 islands off the Western Australian coast between Lancelin and Dongara. One island (Target Rock) is proposed for inclusion in the nature reserves. The reference to ‘the islands’ in this management plan refers to both the existing and proposed island nature reserves. This management plan should be viewed in conjunction with the management plan for the Jurien Bay Marine Park in which many of the islands lie. The planning process for both the islands and marine park was undertaken concurrently, and their management will be integrated and implemented together. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Turquoise Coast Island Nature Reserves Management Plan was prepared by Liesl Jonker (CALM’s Marine Conservation Branch) and Laurina Bullen (CALM’s Management Planning Unit). Many people provided valuable assistance in the preparation of this plan, including: v staff from CALM’s Midwest Region and Moora District, in particular Sue Hancock, Keith Hockey, Andrew Darbyshire, Peter Fishwick, Nigel Sercombe, Kelly Gillen, Anthony Desmond and David Rose (former District Manager, Moora); v staff from CALM’s Science Division; v staff from CALM’s Information Management Branch; and v Friends of Lancelin Island. NOMENCLATURE Inclusion of a name in this publication does not imply its approval by the relevant nomenclature authority. The word ‘Noongar’ can be spelt in numerous ways. The spelling of Noongar in this form should also be seen to encompass all other spellings. ii Table 1. Turquoise Coast Islands Access Summary Access Seabird Reserve Name Island Name Limited Prohibited Breeding Lancelin and Edwards Islands Nature Edwards Island ^ Reserve Lancelin Island ^ Wedge Island Nature Reserve Wedge Island ^ Proposed Nature Reserve Target Rock ^ Buller, Whittell and Green Islands South Green Island ^ Nature Reserve North Green Island ^ Whittell Island ^ Buller Island z ^ Cervantes Islands Nature Reserve South Cervantes Island ^ Middle Cervantes Island ^ North Cervantes Island ^ Ronsard Rocks Nature Reserve South Ronsard Rocks ^ North Ronsard Rocks Outer Rocks Nature Reserve South Outer Rocks ^ North Outer Rocks ^ Essex Rocks Nature Reserve South Essex Rocks ^ Middle Essex Rocks ^ North Essex Rocks ^ Escape Island Nature Reserve Escape Island ^ Boullanger, Whitlock, Favorite, Tern Whitlock Island ^ and Osprey Islands Nature Reserve Boullanger Island ^ Tern Island ^ Osprey Island ^ Favorite Island ^ Sandland Island Nature Reserve Sandland Island ^ Fisherman Islands Nature Reserve South Fisherman Island ¢ ^ North Fisherman Island z ^ Lipfert, Milligan and Snag Islands and Milligan Island ^ Webb Islet and Orton & Drummond Rocks Nature Reserve Orton Rock Lipfert Island ^ Webb Islet ^ Drummond Rock ^ Snag Island ^ Beagle Islands Nature Reserve South-West Beagle Island ^ East Beagle Island z ^ North-West Beagle Island ^ Note: limited access area prohibited access area z prohibited access area due to sea-lion breeding island ¢ prohibited access area due to proximity to sea-lion breeding island ^ seabirds use the island for breeding islands located within the Jurien Bay Marine Park iii CONTENTS PREFACE...............................................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................... ii PART A. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Key Values ........................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Public Participation ........................................................................................................................... 4 PART B. MANAGEMENT DIRECTIONS AND PURPOSE .....................................................5 4. Vision ................................................................................................................................................ 5 5. Legislative Framework...................................................................................................................... 5 6. Existing and Proposed Tenure........................................................................................................... 6 7. Management Arrangements with Aboriginal People ........................................................................ 7 8. Land Classification............................................................................................................................ 7 9. Performance Assessment................................................................................................................... 9 PART C. MANAGING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ....................................................10 10. Biogeography .................................................................................................................................. 10 11. Climate, Geology and Geomorphology........................................................................................... 12 12. Native Plants and Plant Communities............................................................................................. 13 13. Native Animals and Habitats........................................................................................................... 15 14. Landscape........................................................................................................................................ 23 15. Fire................................................................................................................................................... 24 16. Environmental Weeds ..................................................................................................................... 25 17. Introduced and Other Problem Animals.......................................................................................... 28 PART D. MANAGING OUR CULTURAL HERITAGE..........................................................29 18. Cultural Heritage ............................................................................................................................. 29 PART E. MANAGING RECREATION AND TOURISM .......................................................32 19. Visitor Access.................................................................................................................................. 32 20. Recreation Use and Opportunities................................................................................................... 33 21. Tourism and Commercial Operations ............................................................................................. 35 22. Visitor Safety................................................................................................................................... 37 23. Domestic Animals........................................................................................................................... 38 Part F. MANAGING SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE USE........................................................39 24. Mineral and Petroleum Resources................................................................................................... 39 25. Commercial Fishing and Collection................................................................................................ 40 PART G. INVOLVING THE COMMUNITY..........................................................................42 26. Information, Education and Interpretation ...................................................................................... 42 27. Working with the Community......................................................................................................... 43 PART H. IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN .................................................................................45 28. Research .......................................................................................................................................... 45 29. Administration................................................................................................................................. 46 30. Term of the Plan.............................................................................................................................. 46 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptile-Like Physiology in Early Jurassic Stem-Mammals
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title: Reptile-like physiology in Early Jurassic stem-mammals Authors: Elis Newham1*, Pamela G. Gill2,3*, Philippa Brewer3, Michael J. Benton2, Vincent Fernandez4,5, Neil J. Gostling6, David Haberthür7, Jukka Jernvall8, Tuomas Kankanpää9, Aki 5 Kallonen10, Charles Navarro2, Alexandra Pacureanu5, Berit Zeller-Plumhoff11, Kelly Richards12, Kate Robson-Brown13, Philipp Schneider14, Heikki Suhonen10, Paul Tafforeau5, Katherine Williams14, & Ian J. Corfe8*. Affiliations: 10 1School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 3Earth Science Department, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 4Core Research Laboratories, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 5European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. 15 6School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 7Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 8Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 9Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 10Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 20 11Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Zentrum für Material-und Küstenforschung GmbH Germany. 12Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 13Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 14Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Occurrence Data Predict Genetic Diversity in a Species-Rich Clade of Australian Lizards Supplementary Online Material
    Museum occurrence data predict genetic diversity in a species-rich clade of Australian lizards Supplementary Online Material Sonal Singhal, Huateng Huang, Pascal O. Title, Stephen C. Donnellan, Iris Holmes, Daniel L. Rabosky March 9, 2017 Contents 1 Materials and Methods 2 1.1 Sampling . .2 1.2 Library Preparation and Sequencing . .2 1.3 Testing Methods for ddRAD data assembly . .2 1.4 Species Delimitation . .3 1.5 Measures of Genetic Diversity . .4 1.5.1 Generating Pseudo-reference Genomes . .4 1.5.2 Within-population p ......................................4 1.5.3 Species-wide p .........................................5 1.5.4 mtDNA p ............................................5 1.5.5 Calculating diversity . .5 1.6 Demographic Analyses . .5 1.6.1 Running ADMIXTURE . .5 1.6.2 Running ANGSD . .5 1.6.3 Running LAMARC . .6 1.7 Species Tree . .6 1.8 Collecting data on possible drivers of genetic diversity . .7 1.8.1 Proxies for census population size . .7 1.8.2 Environmental hetereogeneity . .9 1.8.3 Historical demography . .9 1.8.4 Possible confounders . .9 1.9 Model-Testing . 10 2 Figures and Tables 10 2.1 Tables . 10 2.2 Figures . 13 1 1 Materials and Methods 1.1 Sampling This study takes advantage of the numerous tissue samples accessioned in natural history museums across the United States and Australia. In this study, we sampled tissues from 8 museums: Australian Museum, Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates, Australian Biological Tissue Collection, Northern Territory Mu- seum, Queensland Museum, South Australian Museum, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, and Western Australian Museum. Species boundaries in the genus Ctenotus have been subject to sufficient revi- sion (1), and, like many squamate species, many Ctenotus species contain multiple, cryptic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing the Hydrodynamics of Jurien Bay, Western Australia
    Characterizing the Hydrodynamics of Jurien Bay, Western Australia Kellie Holloway June 2006 Professor Charitha Pattiaratchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Engineering (Applied Ocean Science) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract Abstract Jurien Bay is a small town on the Central West Coast of Western Australia. With an expanding economy based on fishing, aquaculture and tourism and proximity to Perth, Jurien Bay is expected to grow rapidly over the coming years. Increasing anthropogenic pressure has the potential to compromise the currently pristine natural environment. The livelihood of the town and the economy relies on the quality of the marine environment in particular; hence it is important to understand the dynamics of the system. This study investigates the characteristics of circulation in Essex Lagoon, a deep basin to the south of the main Jurien Bay settlement. This area is a particularly important for investigation due to the future impact of the adjacent Ardross Estates development and the aquaculture zone located within Essex Lagoon. An Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) was deployed in summer 2006 to obtain profiles of current velocity and magnitude over three weeks in Essex Lagoon. This data complemented similar data collected during winter 2002 in Essex Lagoon and was used to carry out a seasonal comparison of currents, to characterize circulation patterns and to examine the potential for outside forcing such as atmospheric pressure systems and the Leeuwin Current to influence circulation. A distinct seasonality was found in the circulation characteristics between summer and winter and this was primarily influenced by seasonality in the wind field.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurien Bay Marine Park & Turquoise Coast Islands
    Periodic Assessment Report – Jurien Bay Marine Park & Turquoise Coast Islands Conservation and Parks Commission - Function The Conservation and Parks Commission’s (Commission) periodic assessments are undertaken primarily to fulfil the functions described in section 19 (g) of the Conservation and Land Management Act 1984, that is to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of management plans by those responsible for implementing them. The assessments also inform the Commission’s policy advice function to the Minister for Environment on the development of policies, amongst others, on the achievement of the purpose of the reservation of the land, for the preservation of the natural environment and the provision of facilities for the enjoyment of that environment by the community; and conservation and management of biodiversity and biodiversity components throughout the State. The periodic assessment was undertaken in accordance with the Commission’s position statement and guidelines for periodic assessments. This document is available on the Commission’s website: www.conservation.wa.gov.au. Approved at Conservation and Parks Commission meeting 20th July 2018 Assessment number: CRMPPA–01/18 Conservation and Parks Commission Block 11, 17 Dick Perry Avenue Kensington WA 6151 The recommended reference for this report is: Conservation and Parks Commission (2018). Periodic assessment – Jurien Bay Marine Park and Turquoise Coast Island Nature Reserves. Conservation and Parks Commission, Kensington, WA. The use of Department of Biodiversity,
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors That Contribute to the Establishment of Marine Protected Areas in Western Australia
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2014 Factors that contribute to the establishment of marine protected areas in Western Australia Andrew Hill University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Hill, A. (2014). Factors that contribute to the establishment of marine protected areas in Western Australia (Doctor of Natural Resource Management). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/92 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Factors that Contribute to the Establishment of Marine Protected Areas in Western Australia Andrew Hill School of Arts and Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Australia Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Natural Resource Management May 2014 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any University or other institute of tertiary education. Information derived from published and unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text with references provided for that material.
    [Show full text]
  • VIII-17 West-Central Australian Shelf: LME #44
    VIII East Asian Seas 321 VIII-17 West-Central Australian Shelf: LME #44 T. Irvine, J. Keesing, N. D’Adamo, M.C. Aquarone and S. Adams The West-Central Australian Shelf LME extends off Western Australia (WA) from Cape Leeuwin (~34.5°S) to Northwest Cape (~22°S). This LME owes much of its biogeographic unity to the respective connecting influences of the West Australian Current, a northward flow coming from the circulation pattern of the counterclockwise Indian Ocean gyre, and the Leeuwin Current (LC), the only west coast poleward-flowing eastern boundary current in the southern hemisphere. The LC is a major southward flow of warm, low nutrient, buoyant tropical water along this LME’s relatively narrow continental shelf, and is responsible for tropical reefs and associated marine flora and fauna flourishing further south than anywhere else in the world (CALM, 1994). In addition to these regional scale currents, there are wind-driven coastal counter currents dominating the circulation close to shore mainly during the austral spring/summer period (Pattiaratchi, 2006). Relatively high energy from sea and swell is a major feature of this LME, but there are embayments and lagoons where waves are restricted or effectively blocked, with sheltered highly biodiverse protected habitats occurring behind offshore limestone reefs in many localities (CALM, 1994). The LME has an extremely narrow shelf, in some areas being merely 40 km wide, and covers an area of nearly 550,000 km2, about 2% of which is gazetted as a marine protected area (MPA) that contains 0.37% of the world’s coral reefs (CALM, 2005a; Sea Around Us, 2007; www.dec.wa.gov.au).
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.
    [Show full text]
  • (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) Species Group and a New Species of Immediate Conservation Concern in the Southwestern Australian Biodiversity Hotspot
    Zootaxa 3390: 1–18 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular phylogeny and morphological revision of the Ctenotus labillardieri (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) species group and a new species of immediate conservation concern in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot GEOFFREY M. KAY & J. SCOTT KEOGH 1 Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Ctenotus is the largest and most diverse genus of skinks in Australia with at least 97 described species. We generated large mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data sets for 70 individuals representing all available species in the C. labillardieri species- group to produce the first comprehensive phylogeny for this clade. The widespread C. labillardieri was sampled extensively to provide the first detailed phylogeographic data set for a reptile in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot. We supplemented our molecular data with a comprehensive morphological dataset for the entire group, and together these data are used to revise the group and describe a new species. The morphologically highly variable species C. labillardieri comprises seven well-supported genetic clades that each occupy distinct geographic regions. The phylogeographic patterns observed in this taxon are consistent with studies of frogs, plants and invertebrates, adding strength to emerging biogeographic hypotheses in this iconic region. The species C. catenifer, C. youngsoni, and C. gemmula are well supported, and despite limited sampling both C. catenifer and C. gemmula show substantial genetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • No Evidence for the 'Rate-Of-Living' Theory Across the Tetrapod Tree of Life
    Received: 23 June 2019 | Revised: 30 December 2019 | Accepted: 7 January 2020 DOI: 10.1111/geb.13069 RESEARCH PAPER No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life Gavin Stark1 | Daniel Pincheira-Donoso2 | Shai Meiri1,3 1School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Abstract 2School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s Aim: The ‘rate-of-living’ theory predicts that life expectancy is a negative function of University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom the rates at which organisms metabolize. According to this theory, factors that accel- 3The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel erate metabolic rates, such as high body temperature and active foraging, lead to organismic ‘wear-out’. This process reduces life span through an accumulation of bio- Correspondence Gavin Stark, School of Zoology, Faculty of chemical errors and the build-up of toxic metabolic by-products. Although the rate- Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, of-living theory is a keystone underlying our understanding of life-history trade-offs, 6997801, Israel. Email: [email protected] its validity has been recently questioned. The rate-of-living theory has never been tested on a global scale in a phylogenetic framework, or across both endotherms and Editor: Richard Field ectotherms. Here, we test several of its fundamental predictions across the tetrapod tree of life. Location: Global. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Land vertebrates. Methods: Using a dataset spanning the life span data of 4,100 land vertebrate spe- cies (2,214 endotherms, 1,886 ectotherms), we performed the most comprehensive test to date of the fundamental predictions underlying the rate-of-living theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biological Invasion Risk from Vertebrate Species in Zoos ⇑ Phillip Cassey A, , Carolyn J
    Biological Conservation 181 (2015) 18–26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Escaping captivity: The biological invasion risk from vertebrate species in zoos ⇑ Phillip Cassey a, , Carolyn J. Hogg b a School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia b Zoo and Aquarium Association Australasia, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia article info abstract Article history: Worldwide, invasive alien species increasingly contribute to environmental change and are a massive Received 6 August 2014 drain on social and economic resources. In Australia, the detection of new vertebrate incursions (i.e., alien Received in revised form 17 October 2014 species not currently established) has increased over the last decade. In other parts of the world, zoos Accepted 21 October 2014 have been identified as one of the influential pathways for the establishment of alien vertebrate species. We quantified the number of vertebrate species released (escaped and stolen) from Australian zoos between 1870 and 2010. The majority of reported releases (185 out of 230) have occurred since 1985. Keywords: Most of the species (77.9%), which have escaped, or been stolen, from Australian zoos have only ever been Biological invasions released once. In sum, escapes were much more common (89%) than thefts. Compared to the other three Biosecurity Risk assessment vertebrate classes (amphibians, birds, mammals) reptiles experienced a significantly greater proportion Vertebrate pests of thefts than expected by chance. Almost half of all escapes (46%) were bird species. Birds also had Zoological parks the lowest retrieval rate, and therefore posed the greatest potential risk to establishment and subsequent invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Flinders Council Planning Scheme 2012
    Joins Map 57 Beagle Island Little Goose Island Goose Island Boxen Island Legend Draft Flinders Council 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Scheme Overlays Land Titles Metres Planning Scheme 2012 - Overlays Airport Buffer Roads Map Scale 1 : 25,000 when printed at A3 1:25000 Series Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55 Buffer/Attenuation Map 56 of 81 Local Scenic Management Area Base data from theLIST, © State of Tasmania Regional Model Overlays Land title data current as of 30/04/2012 Flood Risk Priority Habitat Before taking any action based on data shown on this map Acid Sulfate Soil Probability it should first be verified with a Planning Officer of Date: 16/05/2012 Flinders Council. Doc. Version: 0 Prepared by Joins Map 55 Badger Island Little Badger Island Joins Map 56 Legend Draft Flinders Council 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Scheme Overlays Land Titles Metres Planning Scheme 2012 - Overlays Airport Buffer Roads Map Scale 1 : 25,000 when printed at A3 1:25000 Series Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55 Buffer/Attenuation Map 57 of 81 Local Scenic Management Area Base data from theLIST, © State of Tasmania Regional Model Overlays Land title data current as of 30/04/2012 Flood Risk Priority Habitat Before taking any action based on data shown on this map Acid Sulfate Soil Probability it should first be verified with a Planning Officer of Date: 16/05/2012 Flinders Council. Doc. Version: 0 Prepared by Joins Map 53 Vansittart Island Pelican Island Cape Barren Island Puncheon Island Joins Map 62 Legend Draft Flinders Council 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
    [Show full text]