VILLAGE of DEEP CREEK ★★★ the Dismal Swamp Rangers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

VILLAGE OF DEEP CREEK ★★★ The Dismal Swamp Rangers Before you is the Deep Creek Lock to Fort Boykin on Burwell’s Bay until it crossed the James River to serve of the Great Dismal Swamp Canal. in the Confederate Warwick River defenses. The Peninsula Campaign took The canal was an important thor- a toll on this small company of 68 men. At the Battle of Frazer’s Farm oughfare, connecting the North (Glendale) on June 30, 1862, it suffered 22 killed and wounded. One soldier, Carolina Sounds with Hampton Private Maurice Liverman, was mortally wounded during the battle, yet Roads and the Chesapeake Bay. turned to his comrades and said, “Boys, I can’t live much longer, so hold me The Dismal Swamp Canal is up so that I can fire one more shot and kill one more Yankee before I die, the oldest operating artificial water- to get even with them for my own death.” His fellow soldiers complied. The Village of Deep Creek, c. 1890. way in the United States. Construc- The Dismal Swamp Rangers continued to serve in the Army of tion was authorized by the Virginia legislature in 1787 and subsequently by Northern Virginia after the Peninsula Campaign. The unit fought at Second North Carolina in 1790. Both Union and Confederate strategists recognized Manassas, Antietam, Fredericksburg, Gettysburg, Dinwiddie Court House, the canal’s importance and sought to control the waterway. and Five Forks. Two members of the Rangers surrendered at Appomattox. One commercial center that grew along the canal during the ante- Passage of Union boats through the Dismal Swamp Canal. bellum era is the Village of Deep Creek. By 1850 Deep Creek had become a village of about fifty houses and served as the main depot for the lumber taken from the Dismal Swamp. Even though Deep Creek was thinly populated, local patriotism for the Southern rights prompted the organization of a militia company known as the Dismal Swamp Rangers in 1856. When Virginia left the Union, the Rangers rushed to Portsmouth to occupy the Gosport Navy Yard and then the Portsmouth Naval Hospital. The unit was mustered into Confederate service shortly thereafter as Company A, Third Virginia Regiment. After building batteries to defend Norfolk and Portsmouth, the company was sent.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology
i BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH CAROLINA UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Barbara Lynn Brooks, Ann M. Merriman, Madeline P. Spencer, and Mark Wilde-Ramsing Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives and History April 2009 ii FOREWARD In the forty-five years since the salvage of the Modern Greece, an event that marks the beginning of underwater archaeology in North Carolina, there has been a steady growth in efforts to document the state’s maritime history through underwater research. Nearly two dozen professionals and technicians are now employed at the North Carolina Underwater Archaeology Branch (N.C. UAB), the North Carolina Maritime Museum (NCMM), the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and East Carolina University’s (ECU) Program in Maritime Studies. Several North Carolina companies are currently involved in conducting underwater archaeological surveys, site assessments, and excavations for environmental review purposes and a number of individuals and groups are conducting ship search and recovery operations under the UAB permit system. The results of these activities can be found in the pages that follow. They contain report references for all projects involving the location and documentation of physical remains pertaining to cultural activities within North Carolina waters. Each reference is organized by the location within which the reported investigation took place. The Bibliography is divided into two geographical sections: Region and Body of Water. The Region section encompasses studies that are non-specific and cover broad areas or areas lying outside the state's three-mile limit, for example Cape Hatteras Area. The Body of Water section contains references organized by defined geographic areas.
[Show full text]
A Contribution Towards a Vascular Flora of the Great Dismal Swamp
- i -. A Contribution towards a Vascular Flora of the Great Dismal Swamp LYTTON J. MUSSELMAN, DANIEL L. NICKRENT, AND GERALD F. LEVY r Reprinted from RHODORA, Vol. 79, No. 818, April 1977 pages 240-268 - A CONTRIBUTION TOW ARDS A VASCULAR FLORA OF THE GREAT DISMAL SWAMP LYTTON J. MUSSELMAN, DANIELL. NICKRENT,1 AND GERALD F. LEVY This flora is an enumeration of the vascular plants growing without cultivation in the Great Dismal Swamp. It is hoped that this work will be of value to the rapidly increasing number of persons visiting the swamp, particularly since the establishment of the Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge in 1973. Great pains have been taken to ensure completeness of the inventory presented here. Yet, the Dismal Swamp is difficult to botanize, and additional species will undoubtedly be added to the present list. Previous botanical work in the swamp is listed in Kirk et al. (in press). LOCATION AND EXTENT OF AREA The Great Dismal Swamp, which occupies about 104,000 ha. of North Carolina and Virginia (Figure 1), is one of the largest remaining swamp forests on the Coastal Plain. Although the swamp is considered to be centered around Lake Drummond in the Virginia cities of Suffolk and Chesapeake, it extends into the North Carolina counties of Currituck, Camden, Perquimans, Gates, and Pasquotank. Except for the western edge, which is delimited by the Suffolk Escarpment (Henry, 1970), the boundaries of the swamp are not sharply defined. TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The Dismal Swamp is situated on a low, poorly drained flat marine terrace which ranges from 4.5 to 7 m.
[Show full text]
Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862
Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862 Table of Contents User Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Container List Processed by Emily Hershman 27 June 2011 Thomas Balch Library 208 W. Market Street Leesburg, VA 20176 USER INFORMATION VOLUME OF COLLECTION: 2 folders COLLECTION DATES: 1862 PROVENANCE: W. Roger Smith, Midland, TX. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: Collection open for research USE RESTRICTIONS: No physical characteristics affect use of this material. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from Thomas Balch Library. CITE AS: W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection, 1862 (SC 0084), Thomas Balch Library, Leesburg, VA. ALTERNATE FORMATS: None OTHER FINDING AIDS: None TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: None RELATED HOLDINGS: None ACCESSION NUMBERS: 1995.0046 NOTES: Formerly filed in Thomas Balch Library Vertical Files 2 HISTORICAL SKETCH From its organization in July 1861, the Army of the Potomac remained the primary Union military force in the East, confronting General Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) Army of Northern Virginia in a series of battles and skirmishes. In the early years of the Civil War, however, the Army of the Potomac suffered defeats at the Battle of the First Bull Run in 1861, the Peninsula Campaign and the Battle of Fredericksburg in 1862, as well as the Battle of Chancellorsville in 1863. Historians attribute its initial lack of victories to poor leadership from a succession of indecisive generals: Irvin McDowell (1818-1885), George McClellan (1826-1885), Ambrose Burnside (1824-1881), and Joseph Hooker (1814-1879). When General George Meade (1815-1872) took command of the Army of the Potomac in June 1863, he was successful in pushing the Army of Northern Virginia out of Pennsylvania following the Battle of Gettysburg.
[Show full text]
The Battle of Sailor's Creek
THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
[Show full text]
1 Longstreet, James. from Manassas to Appomattox: Memoirs of the Civil
Longstreet, James. From Manassas to Appomattox: Memoirs of the Civil War in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2020. Hardback: $75.00; Paperback $25.00 . ISBN: 978-0-253-04706-9. Much detail on various commands, and units; much matter of fact accounts and description, often impersonal; good deal of the quoting from the Official records; mild and often indirect in any criticisms of Lee; some sly anti-Jackson comments; much attention to vindicating his performance at Gettysburg; Introduction by James I. Robertson, Jr. 1. Long controversy about Longstreet at Gettysburg 2. Notes Freeman reduced criticism of Longstreet 3. Imposing physically, some deafness, sparse conversation 4. Three children died of scarlet fever early in 1862 5. More dependable than brilliant, not suited for independent command 6. Limited insight but stubbornness 7. Close relationship with Lee 8. Calming influence 9. Favored the defensive 10. Did well at Chickamauga 11. Failure in independent command at Knoxville 12. Ruinous decision to become a Republican 13. Mixed performance at Gettysburg—not good at defending himself after the war 14. Memoir is “unbalanced, critical, and sometimes erroneous,” p. xxiii 15. Mixed record of a dependable general, Lee’s war horse Forward by Christopher Keller ` 1. indispensable narrative about the Army of Northern Virginia 2. praises great eye for detail 3. compares well with Grant’s and Sherman’s memoirs Background, planter’s son, 13 Not much of an academic at West Point, 15-16 Service in regular army, 17ff Mexican War, 19-28 New Mexico, 29-30 Cheering on way to Richmond, 32 Bull Run, Manassas campaign, McDowell and Beauregard criticized, 33-58 Siege of the Potomac, 59ff Richardson invited Longstreet to a dinner party, 59 Skirmishes, 60ff Defenses of Richmond, 64-65 Council of war, Davis, Lee, opinion of McClellan.
[Show full text]
RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Stewart L
RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director HISTORICAL HANDBOOK NUMBER THIRTY-THREE This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service of the United States Department of the Interior. It is printed by the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington 25, D.C. Price 25 cents. RICHMOND National Battlefield Park Virginia by Joseph P. Cullen NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL HANDBOOK SERIES NO. 33 Washington, D.C., 1961 The National Park System, of which Richmond National Battlefield Park is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and inspiration of its people. Contents Page Richmond 1 The Army of the Potomac 2 PART ONE THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN, SUMMER 1862 On to Richmond 3 Up the Peninsula 4 Drewry's Bluff 5 Seven Pines (Fair Oaks) 6 Lee Takes Command 9 The Seven Days Begins 12 Beaver Dam Creek (Ellerson's Mill) 13 Gaines' Mill 16 Savage Station 18 Glendale (Frayser's Farm) 21 Malvern Hill 22 End of Campaign 24 The Years Between 27 PART TWO THE FINAL STRUGGLE FOR RICHMOND, 1864-65 Lincoln's New Commander 28 Cold Harbor 29 Fort Harrison 37 Richmond Falls 40 The Park 46 Administration 46 Richmond, 1858. From a contemporary sketch. HE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR was unique in many respects. One Tof the great turning points in American history, it was a national tragedy op international significance.
[Show full text]
Another Look at Mcclellan's Peninsula Campaign
Kevin Dougherty. The Peninsula Campaign of 1862: A Military Analysis. Michael Moore. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2005. ix + 183 pp. $45.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-57806-752-7. Reviewed by Bruce Tap Published on H-CivWar (August, 2007) Although not as popular as such major Civil Manassas Junction in Virginia, McClellan would War battles as Gettysburg, Antietam, or Freder‐ initiate a turning movement, transporting Union icksburg, the Peninsula Campaign has attracted forces from Annapolis, Maryland, via the Chesa‐ the attention of a number Civil War and military peake Bay, to Urbanna, Virginia on the Rappahan‐ historians in the last several years. In addition to nock River. From there, it was a quick march to the work of Stephen Sears, both Thomas Rowland Richmond. If Confederate forces under Joseph and Ethan Rafuse have written major works on Johnston withdrew from Manassas and were able George McClellan that have dealt extensively with to occupy Richmond prior to McClellan's army, the Peninsula Campaign.[1] Although slimmer Union forces would cross to the south bank of the and far less scholarly in terms of archival sources, James River and operate against Richmond from Kevin Dougherty and J. Michael Moore provide a the south. McClellan believed his plan was faster succinct summary of the Peninsula Campaign that than the overland route and less costly because it offers both a comprehensive treatment of the would most likely avoid dangerous frontal as‐ campaign's major battles as well as a penetrating saults--the Confederate army would probably be analysis of the significance of both Union and forced to attack McClellan in an effort to drive Confederate operations during this campaign.
[Show full text]
Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge
To Williamsburg U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge 10 664 58 3100 Desert Road 32 Suffolk, VA 23434 264 64 757/986 3705 Great Dismal To Norfolk s www.fws.gov/refuge/Great_Dismal_Swamp ypas 337 64 and 58 B 58 Virginia 460 58 Chesapeake Old Beach Federal Relay Service 460 Mill 17-Bus 460 Road Swamp 13 Martin for the deaf and hard-of-hearing Johnson Road 1 800/877 8339 ss ypa Suffolk 8 B 5 Big Entry Ditch 17 National Wildlife 58 Williamson Ditch 165 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service New Ditch 1 800/344 WILD Jericho 32 Lane Hudnell Ditch Hudnell Ditch http://www.fws.gov Refuge 13 Bypass Rosemary 17 13 d Jericho Ditch Ditch a 64 Gloucester 13 April 2016 o R East Ditch East h Portsmouth Ditch Trails s Williamsburg r Northeast Ditch a ynn Ditch Hampton L 13 M Camp Ditch Wakefield rail e 17 460 t 642 Norfolk i Virginia h Middle Ditch Windsor Beach 32 Franklin 64 165 604 W 58 Suffolk Chesapeake Virginia 13 168 N. Carolina S. 258 Sunbury Washington Ditch Elizabeth Refuge City Office Railroad Ditch 17 Dismal Swamp Canal T 604 Lake N Drummond Feeder Ditch 0 Miles 3 642 Interior Ditch ack R Ballah oa d 0 2 est Ditch est W Kilometers Road South Ditch Virginia Great Dismal Swamp North Carolina Desert National Wildlife Refuge DanielsRd. Dismal Swamp 17 Legend State Park Refuge Office Parking Area Auto Tour Route by Permit Trail Entrance Dismal Swamp Canal Swamp Dismal Refuge Area 32 Hiking / Biking Trail Pas qu South Boat Access Area ota nk Mills 158 R Pier iv er Sunbury 158 17 158 To Outer Banks Foggy morn This blue goose, designed by J.N.
[Show full text]
Confederate Invasions – the Union in Peril Part 1 – the Maryland Campaign: Antietam and Emancipation Class Notes
Confederate Invasions – The Union In Peril Part 1 – The Maryland Campaign: Antietam and Emancipation Class Notes Lecture 2 – “You Are All Green Alike”: Campaigns of 1861-1862 A. Both Sides Mobilize • North has advantages in manpower; manufacturing; and railroad network • South has advantages in 3.5 million slaves; armed state militias; geography • U.S. military has only 15,000 men; 42 ships (only 3 ready on 15 Apr) • Many Southern officers resign, join Confederacy • Lee turns down command of Federal forces; Goes with Virginia B. Political & Military Strategies • Lincoln and Davis – contrasting Commanders-in-Chief • Union Strategy: Scott’s Anaconda Plan – Subdue south with minimum of bloodshed • Southern Strategy: Defend the homeland and erode Union public support • Northern Pressure to Act: On to Richmond C. Eastern Theater – First Manassas; McClellan’s Peninsula Campaign • First Manassas/Bull Run (21 July 1861) – demolishes many myths • Rise of McClellan - “Little Napoleon” • Lincoln forced to become his own general-in-chief • Peninsula Campaign (April-May 1862) – plan to flank Confederate defenses • Army of Potomac, 100,000 strong, advances slowly, cautiously • Battle of Seven Pines – Johnston wounded; Lee assumes command • Jackson’s Valley Campaign – one bright spot for Confederacy D. Western Theater – 1862 Early Union Successes – Grant Emerges • Grant captures Forts Henry & Donelson in February 1861 • Nashville is abandoned by retreating Confederates • Battle of Pea Ridge (8 March): Union victory • Battle of Shiloh (6-7 April): Grant again victorious • New Orleans falls to Admiral Farragut on 25 April • Halleck’s Union forces capture Memphis on 6 June E. Political Dimension • Despite Union successes in the Western Theater, the key to victory in the Civil War is the public’s “will to continue” in the face of mounting costs.
[Show full text]
Civil War Battles, Campaigns, and Sieges
Union Victories 1862 February 6-16: Fort Henry and Fort Donelson Campaign (Tennessee) March 7-8: Battle of Pea Ridge (Arkansas) April 6-7: Battle of Shiloh/ Pittsburg Landing (Tennessee) April 24-27: Battle of New Orleans (Louisiana) September 17: Battle of Antietam/ Sharpsburg (Maryland) October 8: Battle of Perryville (Kentucky) December 31-January 2, 1863: Battle of Stone’s River/ Murfreesboro (Tennessee) 1863 March 29- July 4: Vicksburg Campaign and Siege (Mississippi)- turning point in the West July 1-3: Battle of Gettysburg (Pennsylvania)- turning point in the East November 23-25: Battle of Chattanooga (Tennessee) 1864 May 7-September 2: Atlanta Campaign (Georgia) June 15-April 2, 1865: Petersburg Campaign and Siege (Virginia) August 5: Battle of Mobile Bay (Alabama) October 19: Battle of Cedar Creek (Virginia) December 15-16: Battle of Nashville (Tennessee) November 14-December 22: Sherman’s March to the Sea (Georgia) 1865 March 19-21: Battle of Bentonville/ Carolinas Campaign (North Carolina) Confederate Victories 1861 April 12-14: Fort Sumter (South Carolina) July 21: First Battle of Manassas/ First Bull Run (Virginia) August 10: Battle of Wilson’s Creek (Missouri) 1862 March 17-July: Peninsula Campaign (Virginia) March 23-June 9: Jackson’s Valley Campaign (Virginia) June 25-July 2: Seven Days Battle (Virginia) August 28-30: Second Battle of Manassas/ Second Bull Run (Virginia) December 11-13: Battle of Fredericksburg (Virginia) 1863 May 1-4: Battle of Chancellorsville (Virginia) September 19-20: Battle of Chickamauga (Georgia)
[Show full text]
ITEM #12: for YOUR INFORMATION A. HRTPO Letter of Support to The
ITEM #12: FOR YOUR INFORMATION A. HRTPO Letter of Support to the Virginia Outdoors Foundation Attached is a letter, dated April 2, 2021, from Mr. Robert A. Crum, Jr., HRTPO Executive Director, to Ms. Emily White, Virginia Outdoors Foundation Conversation Grant Program Manager, supporting the East Coast Greenway Alliance’s application for Advancing the East Coast Greenway by Connecting the Great Dismal Swamp Canal Trail. Attachment 12A B. Resolution of Appointment to the HRTPO Board Attached is a resolution, dated April 20, 2021, from the Gloucester County Board of Supervisors, appointing Ms. Carol E. Steel as Acting County Administrator, and thereby, in said position, the non-voting representative to the Board of the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO). Attachment 12B C. Letter of Appointment to the HRTPO Board Attached is a letter, dated April 29, 2021, from Ms. Sandra M. Madison, Chesapeake City Clerk, to the Honorable Richard W. West, Chesapeake City Mayor, notifying him of his appointment as the City’s voting representative to the Board of the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO). Attachment 12C D. VDOT’s HRTAC Program Development Monthly Executive Report VDOT provides monthly reports to the Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission (HRTAC) staff on the status of the Regional Priority Projects. Attachment 12D HRTPO Board Meeting │ May 20, 2021│ Agenda Donnie R. Tuck, Chair; Richard W. “Rick” West, Vice-Chair Robert A. Crum, Jr., Executive Director April 2, 2021 Ms. Emily White Conservation Grant Program Manager Virginia Outdoors Foundation 900 Natural Resources Drive, Suite 800 Charlottesville, VA 22903 SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL RE: Advancing the East Coast Greenway by Connecting the Great Dismal Swamp Canal Trail – Chesapeake, Virginia Dear Ms.
[Show full text]
Veterans' Memorials Located in the City of Chesapeake
’ Compiled by Chris Mulholland Commander, VFW Post 2894 Commissioner, Mayor’s Commission on Veterans Affairs As of 20 May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Chesapeake Veterans’ Memorial / SSG Jonathan K Dozier 1 Battlecross 2. Lakeside Veterans Park 3 3. Veterans Bridge 5 4. Gold Star Memorial Bridge 6 5. Blue Star Memorial Highway 7 6. Chesapeake and Norfolk County Marine Memorial 8 7. LCpl Cody Childers Battle Cross 9 8. PFC Andrew Tuazon Memorial 10 9. Afro-Norfolk County WWII and Korean War Era Veterans 11 Memorial 10. Great Bridge High School WWII Memorial 12 11. South Norfolk WWII Roll of Honor Plaque 13 12. Captain Frederic E. Consolvo, Jr., Park 14 13. Unknown and Known Afro-Union Civil War Soldiers Memorial 15 / Sergeant March Corprew Cemetery 14. Jackson Greys Confederate Monument 16 15. Wallaceton Historical Plaque 17 16. Battle of Great Bridge Memorial 18 17. Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR) Battle of Great 20 Bridge Memorial VETERANS MEMORIALS IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA 1. Chesapeake Veterans’ Memorial / SSG Jonathan K. Dozier Battlecross – City Hall, 306 Cedar Road, Chesapeake, 23322 a. The Chesapeake Veterans' Memorial commemorates the service and sacrifice of Chesapeake citizens and loved ones who are serving or who have served in all branches of the military. The memorial is located on the municipal center grounds and consists of a marble structure and more than 1,800 individual memorial pavers. b. In the front of the memorial stands a Battle Cross dedicated to the memory of SSG Jonathan K. Dozier, USA killed in Iraq in 2008.
[Show full text]