Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Regular Board Meeting March 09, 2021, 8:30 AM NOTICE: Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting will be held entirely by web access and teleconference. The public can view or listen to the meeting and offer public comment by logging/calling into the following web address/conference line at the time the meeting is scheduled: Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/s/82838297904 Meeting ID: 828 3829 7904 Password: 013638 Telephone Dial-in: (669) 900-6833 Any changes to this information will be posted on the District’s website (www.rrbwsd.com) at or before the meeting is called to order. Please check the District’s website if you are unable to hear the meeting.

1. CONSENT ITEMS a) Regular Board Meeting Minutes- February 9, 2021 2. FINANCIAL REPORT a) Treasurer’s Report b) Accounts Payable c) Revenue and Expenditures Report 3. OPERATIONS REPORT a) District Groundwater Levels Report b) Operations Report c) Maintenance Report d) Consideration of Encroachment Permit 4. STATE WATER PROJECT ACTIVITIES a) Update on State Water Project Operations b) California Delta Conveyance Project 5. MANAGER’S REPORT a) Operational Exchange Agreement 6. ENGINEER’S REPORT a) Onyx Ranch i. Operations Report b) Drought Relief Project i. Status Report ii. Consideration of Pumping Plant Flow Meter Replacement c) Recharge and Conveyance Projects i. Consideration of SCADA Flow Measurement Improvements 7. COMMITTEE/SPECIAL PROJECT ACTIVITIES a) Groundwater Banking Authority b) James Groundwater Banking Authority c) Kern Groundwater Authority d) Rosedale Management Area Committee i. Ratification of Accounting Platform Technical Services Agreement ii. Evapotranspiration Calculation Comparison Report e) Kern Fan Monitoring Committee f) Cross Valley Canal Advisory Committee

1 | Page

g) Pioneer Project h) Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority (KRWCA) i) Kern Fan Authority j) Joint Operating Committee (JOC) – Consideration of Groundwater Model Update k) Committee for Delta Reliability l) South Valley Water Resources Authority m) Valley Ag Water Coalition n) Kern Integrated Regional Water Management Plan o) Sites Reservoir Project

8. ATTORNEY’S REPORT

a) Consideration of Engineer-Manager Employment Contract b) Consideration of Revisions to Annual Salary Schedule c) Consideration of Consulting Agreement d) Consideration of Appointment of District Representatives to Various Committees

9. OLD OR NEW BUSINESS a) Consideration of ACWA Region 7 Board of Directors Nomination 10. CORRESPONDENCE

11. PUBLIC COMMENT

12. CLOSED SESSION

a) Conference with legal counsel – Anticipated Litigation: Significant Exposure to Litigation – Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2): Two (2) Matters

b) Conference with legal counsel – Anticipated Litigation: Initiation of Litigation – Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4): Two (2) Matters

c) Public Employment / Appointment – Government Code Sections 54957: Position(s): Engineer-Manager / Water Resources Specialist / Undesignated Position

d) Conference with legal counsel – Pending Litigation – Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1): i. State Water Resources Control Board – Applications to Appropriate Kern River Water ii. City of Bakersfield v. Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District (McAllister CEQA) iii. Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District v. City of Bakersfield (Miscellaneous Contract) iv. Department of Water Resources v. All Persons Interested (Validation Action) v. City of Bakersfield / Kern County Water Agency vs. Rosedale, et al. (Kern Fan Project EIR) vi. Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District, et al. vs. Kern County Water Agency, et al. (CVC Litigation)

e) Conference with real property negotiator – Government Code Section 54956.8 – Negotiators: Eric Averett / Dan Bartel / Dan Raytis i. Property: Water Supply (Delta Conveyance). Negotiating parties: Various parties and Rosedale- Rio Bravo Water Storage District. Under negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment ii. Property: APN: 104-250-29. Negotiating parties: McCaslin River Ranch, LLC and Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District. Under negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment iii. Property: APNs: 104-240-22, 30 & 31. Negotiating parties: Bolthouse Land Company and

2 | Page

Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District. Under negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment iv. Property: APN: 104-291-07. Negotiating parties: Diamond M. Prop, LLC and Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District. Under negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment v. Property: APN: 104-270-28. Negotiating parties: Marc McCaslin and Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District. Under negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment vi. Property: APNs: 103-110-02; 103-110-04; 103-110-09; 103-120-14; 103-120-15; 103-120-16; 103- 120-17; 103-130-01; 103-130-03; 103-130-05; 103-130-07; 103-140-02; 103-140-05; 103-140-06; 103-140-12; 103-140-15; 103-140-16; 103-140-17; 103-140-18; 103-140-19; 103-180-01; 103-180- 05; 103-180-07; 103-190-13; 103-190-14; 103-200-23; 103-200-25; 103-200-26; 103-200-27; 103- 200-28; 103-200-29, County of Kern. Negotiating Parties: Belluomini Ranches, LP, Tech Ag Financial Group, Inc. and Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District. Under negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment vii. Property: Water Supply. Negotiating parties: Various parties and Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District. Under negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment

13. ADJOURNMENT DECLARATION OF POSTING: I, Megan Misuraca, declare under penalty of perjury, that I am employed by the Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District and I posted the foregoing Agenda at the District Office and on the District’s website (www.rrbwsd.com) on or before March 5, 2021. Requests for disability related modifications or accommodations, including auxiliary aids or services may be made by telephoning or contacting Megan Misuraca at [email protected]. Please attempt to make such requests known at least 24 hours before the scheduled meeting.

3 | Page

BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 09, 2021 8:30 a.m. NOTE: This meeting was conducted by teleconference pursuant to and in conformance with Executive Order N-29-20 relating to public meetings during the State of Emergency that was declared as a result of COVID-19.

DIRECTORS PRESENT Roy Pierucci, Gary Unruh, Jason Selvidge, Mitch Millwee and Barry Watts

DIRECTORS ABSENT None

OTHERS PRESENT District Staff / Consultants - Eric Averett, Dan Bartel, Zach Smith, Megan Misuraca, Markus Nygren, Rachelle Echeverria and Dan Raytis Public – Tim Gobler, Garrett Bush, Leta Spencer, Patty Poire, Rick Iger and Audrey Arnao

CALL TO ORDER President Pierucci called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m.

CONSENT ITEMS a) Regular Board Meeting Minutes – January 12, 2021 b) Special Board Meeting Minutes – January 22, 2021 c) Special Board Meeting Minutes – February 3, 2021

A motion was made by Director Unruh and seconded by Director Selvidge to adopt the Consent Items. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None FINANCIAL REPORTS

a) Treasurer’s Report – Mr. Averett reviewed the treasurers report with the Board. A motion was made by Director Millwee with a second by Director Watts to accept the treasurers report as presented. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None b) Accounts Payable/ January 09, 2021 through February 5, 2021 — Ms. Misuraca reviewed the accounts payable report with the Board. A motion was made by Director Watts and seconded

1

by Director Millwee to ratify and approve payment of the accounts payable in the total amount of $1,641,755.54. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None c) Revenue and Expenditures Report – Mr. Averett reviewed the current Revenue and Expenditures Report through 01/31/2021 with the Board. d) Consideration of Proposal for 2020 Audit – Ms. Misuraca reviewed the proposal to complete the District’s 2020 financial audit. The Board asked Ms. Misuraca to inquire as to why the amount did not decrease from last year prior to authorizing the work since it was the Board’s understanding that there were certain items that would only need to be addressed last year. A motion was made by Director Selvidge with a second by Director Unruh to approve the BHK Proposal for the District’s 2020 audit in an amount not to exceed $29,000, subject to an inquiry by Ms. Misuraca as to the amount necessary to complete this year’s audit. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None

DISTRICT OPERATIONS REPORT a) District Water Levels & Hydrographs Report – Mr. Nygren reviewed the current District water levels with the Board. b) Operations Report – Mr. Smith reviewed current operations and projected demands for the beginning of 2021. c) Maintenance Report – Mr. Smith reviewed maintenance projects that have taken place over the last month.

STATE WATER PROJECT ACTIVITIES UPDATE a) Update on State Water Project Operations – Water Management Amendment Presentation – Mr. Averett reviewed key elements in the SWP Water Management Amendment with the Board. No action was taken. b) Consideration of 2021 Turn-Back Pool Program – Mr. Averett reviewed the terms of the 2021 Turn-Back Pool Program with the Board. A motion was made by Director Selvidge with a second by Director Millwee to approve the District’s participation in the 2021 Turn-Back Pool Program and ratify the execution of the agreement. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None c) California Delta Conveyance Project – i. Consideration of IRWD Funding Agreement – Mr. Averett reviewed the terms of the agreement between Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District and Irvine Ranch Water District for Preliminary Planning and Design Costs Related to a Potential Delta Conveyance Project. A motion was made by Director Watts with a second by Director 2

Selvidge to approve the funding agreement and authorize staff to execute the agreement subject to approval of General Counsel. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None MANAGER’S REPORT a) Consideration of Water Program– Mr. Averett reviewed the long-term water agreement between Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD and San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors noting the substantial changes from the prior agreement. A motion was made by Director Selvidge with a second by Director Unruh to approve the agreement and authorize staff to execute. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None b) Consideration to Create and Fill New District Position - Resources Planner – Mr. Bartel discussed the need to create a new District position to assist with various administrative and resources needs of the District. A motion was made by Director Millwee and seconded by Director Watts to create a new position (Resources Specialist) and to offer the position to Ms. Rachelle Echeverria. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None

ENGINEERS / PROJECTS REPORT a) Onyx Ranch i. Operations Report – Mr. Bartel gave an update on staff activities including water operations and flows to the Board and noted that the CEQA Notice of Determination on the Final EIR was posted on January 13, 2021. b) Drought Relief Project i. Status Report – Mr. Nygren reviewed the Project Status Report covering the activities through the end of January 2021 noting staff is considering a change in flow meters as there have been multiple issues with the original flow meters. ii. Stockdale East Wells - Consideration of Pay Estimate – Mr. Bartel gave a brief report on Stockdale East Wells project activities noting the existing ag well will need a motor replacement. A motion was made by Director Millwee with a second by Director Watts to approve and pay Change Order No. 1 for $5,000 to replace the motor in the existing ag well, Pay Estimate No. 6 for $49,073.91 with $2,582.84 retention withheld, and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion subject to the satisfactory completion of the punch list items. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None 3

c) Recharge and Conveyance Projects – Mr. Bartel reported on the latest environmental compliance and design efforts.

COMMITTEE REPORTS a) Groundwater Banking Authority – No report. b) James Groundwater Banking Authority – Mr. Bartel gave a brief report on the latest James Water Bank Authority Operations Committee and Board meeting activities. c) Kern Groundwater Authority- No report. d) Rosedale Management Area Committee i. Request for White Land Inclusion in RRBMA – Mr. Averett briefed the Board on the request from Green Acres Farm to include 3,500 acres of land used for biosolid disposal to be included in RRBMA. The property is located West of I-5, South of Taft Hwy, and East of Enos Lane. Patty Poire from the Kern Groundwater Authority suggested that the Board defer taking any action on the request so that other entities can discuss and/or resolve the issue of inclusion within a management area with the property owner. The Board took no action on the request. ii. Consideration of request for White Land Exclusion in RRBMA – Mr. Bartel reviewed the letter received from Buena Vista WSD requesting the exclusion of a portion of APN: 159- 010-07 from the RRBMA. The remaining section will continue to be covered under the District’s plan. Mr. Bartel noted there would be costs involved to remove the section from our GSP and Buena Vista WSD would be responsible for those costs under the applicable agreement. Patty Poire from KGA noted that DWR has asked the Kern GSA to defer any boundary adjustments until at least September 2021 and that any changes will not be effective until boundary adjustments are made and processed. The Board took no action on the request. iii. Consideration of Managed Services Agreement for Water Accounting Platform – Mr. Nygren and Mr. Averett reviewed the terms of the Managed Services Agreement from Sitka Technologies to manage the Water Accounting Platform. A motion was made by Director Unruh with a second by Director Millwee to authorize staff to execute the annual managed services agreement in the amount of $12,000 covering March 1, 2021 through March 1, 2022. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None iv. Consideration of White Land Budget and Assessment – Mr. Bartel reviewed the 2021 GSP Budget noting the resulting $0 assessment to White Land Management Area landowners. A motion was made by Director Selvidge with a second by Director Unruh to approve the 2021 GSP Budget with $0 assessment to White Lands Management Area landowners for 2021. The motion was unanimously passed. AYES: Directors Pierucci, Unruh, Selvidge, Millwee and Watts NOES: None ABSTAINED: None e) Kern Fan Monitoring Committee – No report. 4

f) Cross Valley Canal Advisory Committee – No report. g) Pioneer Project – Mr. Bartel briefed the Board on the latest Pioneer Project activities. h) Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority (KRWCA) – Mr. Averett briefed the Board on the latest activities. i) Kern Fan Authority – No report. j) Banking Projects Joint Operating Committee (JOC) – No report. k) Committee for Delta Reliability – No report. l) South Valley Water Resources Authority – No report. m) Valley Ag Water Coalition – No report. n) Kern Integrated Regional Water Management Plan – No report.

ATTORNEY’S REPORT None.

OLD OR NEW BUSINESS None.

CORRESPONDENCE None.

PUBLIC COMMENT None.

CLOSED SESSION During the meeting, the Board met in closed session, as follows: At 10:20 a.m. Director Pierucci announced the Board would meet in closed session. At 12:10p.m., the Board reconvened to open session.

Mr. Raytis reported that the Board had directed the General Counsel to consult with an ad-hoc committee of the Board to prepare an employment contract for the Engineer-Manager position with Dan Bartel to be considered by the Board at a future meeting.

ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 12:13.

5

1:43 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/03/21 Accrual Basis RRB Monthly Board Cash Report As of February 28, 2021 Credit Debit Balance

10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo 2,229,290.18 Total 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo 184,612.31 1,444,134.33 969,768.16

10001 ꞏ Payroll- Wells Fargo 89,539.55 Total 10001 ꞏ Payroll- Wells Fargo 150,000.00 128,215.47 111,324.08

10100 ꞏ General County Fund # 60510 4,702,426.59 Total 10100 ꞏ General County Fund # 60510 340,560.83 0.00 5,042,987.42

10101 ꞏ Operations County Fund # 60520 41,590.86 Total 10101 ꞏ Operations County Fund # 60520 231.05 0.00 41,821.91

10102 ꞏ Bond Debt County Fund # 60526 4,971.74 Total 10102 ꞏ Bond Debt County Fund # 60526 14.55 0.00 4,986.29

10103 ꞏ Bond Reserve County Fund #60527 909.09 Total 10103 ꞏ Bond Reserve County Fund #60527 2.66 0.00 911.75

10501 ꞏ 2011 COP W.F. Trust Funds M.M. 4,545.92 Total 10501 ꞏ 2011 COP W.F. Trust Funds M.M. 0.00 4,545.92 0.00

10502 ꞏ 2013 COP W.F. Trust Funds M.M. 7,354.54 Total 10502 ꞏ 2013 COP W.F. Trust Funds M.M. 0.00 7,354.54 0.00

10503 ꞏ 2018 COP Reserve Fund Account 1,034,696.82 Total 10503 ꞏ 2018 COP Reserve Fund Account 1,034,696.82

10550 ꞏ Investment AMG - Wells Fargo 4,041,728.10 Total 10550 ꞏ Investment AMG - Wells Fargo 4,041,728.10

1,350,842.80 3,168,500.52

Total Cash 2/28/2021 11,248,224.53

10504 ꞏ 2020 COP W.F. Trust Funds M.M. 29,686.09 Total 10504 ꞏ 2020 COP W.F. Trust Funds M.M. 2.82 0.00 29,688.91

Total Cash Equivelent 29,688.91

Total Cash Position 2/28/2021 11,277,913.44

Page 1 of 1 2:23 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accounts Payable Report February 6 through March 5, 2021

Type Num Date Name Account Paid Amount

Check 02/11/2021 Wells Fargo 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Client Analysis Fee 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -0.11 TOTAL -0.11

Bill Pmt -Check 03/01/2021 SoCalGas 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 11021673006 Sept 20C 03/01/2021 SoCalGas 20000 ꞏ Accounts Payable 0.00 TOTAL 0.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15797 02/23/2021 ACE HARDWARE 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 58904 02/04/2021 61650 ꞏ Operating Supplies -22.83 TOTAL -22.83

Bill Pmt -Check 15798 02/23/2021 AE-COM Engineering Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 2000459462 02/10/2021 63004 ꞏ Engineering Services -294.84 TOTAL -294.84

Bill Pmt -Check 15799 02/23/2021 AECA 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 30510 Jan 21 02/01/2021 62005 ꞏ Dues and Membership -500.00 TOTAL -500.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15800 02/23/2021 Agri-Valley Irrigation, Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 1001031-IN 02/03/2021 61650 ꞏ Operating Supplies -1.67 TOTAL -1.67

Bill Pmt -Check 15801 02/23/2021 AmeriFuel 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 152267CT 02/15/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61800 ꞏ Fuel -415.87 61800 ꞏ Fuel -1,557.36 TOTAL -1,973.23

Bill Pmt -Check 15802 02/23/2021 AT&T Wireless 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 834339754X02152021 02/15/2021 66001 ꞏ Phone / Internet Expense -961.25 TOTAL -961.25

Bill Pmt -Check 15803 02/23/2021 BC Labortories Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill B406140 02/08/2021 61655 ꞏ Water Quality Testing -190.00 TOTAL -190.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15804 02/23/2021 Builders Mart 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 4612 Jan 2021 02/15/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61650 ꞏ Operating Supplies -283.16 TOTAL -283.16

Bill Pmt -Check 15805 02/23/2021 Cal Valley Equipment 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 1297604 02/08/2021 65201 ꞏ Well Maintenance Expense -2,421.28 TOTAL -2,421.28

Bill Pmt -Check 15806 02/23/2021 Esparza Enterprises, Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 92739 02/10/2021 RRBWSD-IRWD:Strand Ranch 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -902.44 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -902.43 Bill 92829 02/17/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -755.47 RRBWSD-IRWD:Strand Ranch 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -755.47 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -377.74 TOTAL -3,693.55

Bill Pmt -Check 15807 02/23/2021 GEI Consultants, Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 3084577 02/08/2021 CLWA = Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency:SCVW63004 ꞏ Engineering Services -134.26 TOTAL -134.26

Page 1 of 7 2:23 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accounts Payable Report February 6 through March 5, 2021

Type Num Date Name Account Paid Amount

Bill Pmt -Check 15808 02/23/2021 Hyatt Consulting Group 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 20210131 02/01/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -1,200.00 TOTAL -1,200.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15809 02/23/2021 JAMS, Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 5583816 02/18/2021 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -712.94 TOTAL -712.94

Bill Pmt -Check 15810 02/23/2021 Jim's Steel Supply 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 183206 02/09/2021 65100 ꞏ Building Maintenance -336.18 TOTAL -336.18

Bill Pmt -Check 15811 02/23/2021 Kern County Water Agency 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 37344 02/02/2021 RRBWSD:DRP-Drought Relief Project 70000 ꞏ Capital Water Structure Expense -101,682.35 Bill 37343 02/02/2021 RRBWSD-IRWD:Strand Ranch 70000 ꞏ Capital Water Structure Expense -27,417.78 TOTAL -129,100.13

Bill Pmt -Check 15812 02/23/2021 Kern Machinery 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 102-832299 02/01/2021 65001 ꞏ Equip. Maint. & Repair -1,909.14 Bill 103-837965 02/18/2021 65001 ꞏ Equip. Maint. & Repair -73.70 TOTAL -1,982.84

Bill Pmt -Check 15813 02/23/2021 Mission Uniform Service 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 514135337 02/05/2021 63500 ꞏ Janitorial Expense -89.63 Bill 514187781 02/12/2021 63500 ꞏ Janitorial Expense -89.63 Bill 514227832 02/19/2021 63500 ꞏ Janitorial Expense -89.63 TOTAL -268.89

Bill Pmt -Check 15814 02/23/2021 PACE TPA 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 59678 02/01/2021 60005 ꞏ Benefits Health,Dent.Life.Vis.D -210.00 TOTAL -210.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15815 02/23/2021 Peachy Clean 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill Feb 2021 02/01/2021 63500 ꞏ Janitorial Expense -400.00 TOTAL -400.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15816 02/23/2021 PG&E (0103917485-7) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 0103917485-7 Feb21 02/01/2021 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense -66,368.08 TOTAL -66,368.08

Bill Pmt -Check 15817 02/23/2021 PG&E (4831125987-2) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 4831125987-2 Feb21 02/01/2021 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense -68,042.02 TOTAL -68,042.02

Bill Pmt -Check 15818 02/23/2021 PG&E (5919499601-9) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 5919499601-9 Feb2021 02/12/2021 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense -31,101.92 TOTAL -31,101.92

Bill Pmt -Check 15819 02/23/2021 Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 83408 02/10/2021 RRBWSD:123-TCP Costs 63004 ꞏ Engineering Services -898.20 TOTAL -898.20

Bill Pmt -Check 15820 02/23/2021 Purchase Power 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 8107 Feb 21 02/12/2021 62009 ꞏ Postage and Delivery -93.00 TOTAL -93.00

Page 2 of 7 2:23 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accounts Payable Report February 6 through March 5, 2021

Type Num Date Name Account Paid Amount Bill Pmt -Check 15821 02/23/2021 Southern California Edison (2-35-795-5954 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 2-35-795-5954 Jan 21 02/05/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -236.04 TOTAL -236.04

Bill Pmt -Check 15822 02/23/2021 Southern California Edison 2-35-796-7561 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 2-35-796-7561 Feb21 02/04/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense -51.09 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -20.18 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -66.54 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense -75.35 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense -12.70 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -13.48 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -24.38 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -13.48 TOTAL -277.20

Bill Pmt -Check 15823 02/23/2021 Southern California Edison 2-41-976-7850 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 2-41-976-7850 Jan 21 02/04/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -50.18 TOTAL -50.18

Bill Pmt -Check 15824 02/23/2021 Spaletta Law 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 11368 02/01/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -4,712.50 Bill 11369 02/01/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -12,610.00 TOTAL -17,322.50

Bill Pmt -Check 15825 02/23/2021 Spectrum Enterprise 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 064166901020221 02/02/2021 66001 ꞏ Phone / Internet Expense -124.98 TOTAL -124.98

Bill Pmt -Check 15826 02/23/2021 Standard Insurance 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 006492990038 Mar 21 02/01/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 60005 ꞏ Benefits Health,Dent.Life.Vis.D -115.82 60005 ꞏ Benefits Health,Dent.Life.Vis.D -608.80 TOTAL -724.62

Bill Pmt -Check 15827 02/23/2021 SWCA Environmental Consultants 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 122460 02/10/2021 70201 ꞏ Capital Environmental Cons Exp. -4,416.00 TOTAL -4,416.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15828 02/23/2021 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 50015191 02/04/2021 65500 ꞏ Weed Contol/Chemicals -19.81 TOTAL -19.81

Bill Pmt -Check 15829 02/23/2021 TechnoFlo Systems 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 29531 02/09/2021 RRBWSD:DRP-Drought Relief Project 70100 ꞏ Capital Booster Pump -1,983.09 TOTAL -1,983.09

Bill Pmt -Check 15830 02/23/2021 Thomas Harder & Co., Inc. 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 20-054-127.1 02/05/2021 CLWA = Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency:SCVW63006 ꞏ Hydrogeology Consultants -5,050.00 Bill 20-054-123.6 02/05/2021 JOC:JOC 63006 ꞏ Hydrogeology Consultants -1,547.50 TOTAL -6,597.50

Bill Pmt -Check 15831 02/23/2021 United Rentals 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 190292032-001 02/01/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61500 ꞏ Equipment Rental Expense -694.73 61500 ꞏ Equipment Rental Expense -2,084.19 TOTAL -2,778.92

Bill Pmt -Check 15832 02/23/2021 US Irrigation 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill INVUSI-008085 02/02/2021 RRBWSD:DRP-Drought Relief Project 65201 ꞏ Well Maintenance Expense -107.06 TOTAL -107.06

Page 3 of 7 2:23 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accounts Payable Report February 6 through March 5, 2021

Type Num Date Name Account Paid Amount

Bill Pmt -Check 15833 02/23/2021 WestWater Research, LLC 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 29002 02/01/2021 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -2,833.75 TOTAL -2,833.75

Total AP to be ratified -348,662.03

Bill Pmt -Check 15834 03/05/2021 AmeriFuel 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 153320CT 02/28/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61800 ꞏ Fuel -345.30 61800 ꞏ Fuel -1,874.90 TOTAL -2,220.20

Bill Pmt -Check 15835 03/05/2021 Bakersfield Well & Pump Inc. 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill SE Wells Pay App 8 02/23/2021 RRBWSD:DRP-Drought Relief Project 70101 ꞏ Capital Well Expenses -5,000.00 Bill SE Wells Pay App 7 03/01/2021 RRBWSD:DRP-Drought Relief Project 70101 ꞏ Capital Well Expenses -4,750.00 TOTAL -9,750.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15836 03/05/2021 Bank of America- (4339-9320-1030-0901) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 0901 Feb 2021 02/27/2021 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -59.69 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -16.22 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -30.64 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -16.25 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -17.41 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -10.90 TOTAL -151.11

Bill Pmt -Check 15837 03/05/2021 Bank of America- (4339 9316 1146 7887) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 7887 Feb 2021 02/27/2021 65000 ꞏ Auto and Truck Maint. & Repair -29.99 60200 ꞏ Licenses, Permits and Fees -19.95 65001 ꞏ Equip. Maint. & Repair -34.99 TOTAL -84.93

Bill Pmt -Check 15838 03/05/2021 Bank of America - (4339 9311 1205 9266) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 9266 Feb 2021 02/27/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61650 ꞏ Operating Supplies -86.59 TOTAL -86.59

Bill Pmt -Check 15839 03/05/2021 Bank of America - (4339 9314 8979 5617) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 5617 Feb 2021 02/27/2021 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -19.71 TOTAL -19.71

Bill Pmt -Check 15840 03/05/2021 Bank of America (4339 9314 3949 3081) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 3081 Feb 2021 02/27/2021 65000 ꞏ Auto and Truck Maint. & Repair -29.99 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -91.08 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions -59.98 61800 ꞏ Fuel -85.34 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions -359.88 TOTAL -626.27

Bill Pmt -Check 15841 03/05/2021 Bank of America (4339 9314 8551 8245) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 8245 Feb 21 02/27/2021 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -99.05 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -128.46 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions -84.00 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions -168.44 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions -24.00 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions -87.50 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -60.17 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -110.01 TOTAL -761.63

Page 4 of 7 2:23 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accounts Payable Report February 6 through March 5, 2021

Type Num Date Name Account Paid Amount

Bill Pmt -Check 15842 03/05/2021 Barnes Welding Supply 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 91534295 02/27/2021 61650 ꞏ Operating Supplies -31.46 TOTAL -31.46

Bill Pmt -Check 15843 03/05/2021 Barry Watts 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill Feb 2021 02/09/2021 62007 ꞏ Directors' Fees -100.56 TOTAL -100.56

Bill Pmt -Check 15844 03/05/2021 Belden Blaine Raytis, LLP 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 14696 03/05/2021 RRBWSD:CVC Litigation 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -553.00 Bill 14697 03/05/2021 Grounwater Banking JPA:Kern Fan Project 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -768.00 RRBWSD:CVC Litigation 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -4,112.00 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -3,584.00 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -16,576.00 RRBWSD:SGMA 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -256.00 James Water Bank Authority 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -384.00 Bill 14695 03/05/2021 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -5,186.20 Bill 14698 03/05/2021 Grounwater Banking JPA:Kern Fan Project 63000 ꞏ Legal Services -3,840.00 TOTAL -35,259.20

Bill Pmt -Check 15845 03/05/2021 Carroll's Tire Warehouse 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 73352 02/24/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 65000 ꞏ Auto and Truck Maint. & Repair -243.01 Bill 73532 03/05/2021 65000 ꞏ Auto and Truck Maint. & Repair -289.92 TOTAL -532.93

Bill Pmt -Check 15846 03/05/2021 CNH Capital 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 3557 Feb 2021 02/19/2021 65001 ꞏ Equip. Maint. & Repair -762.79 TOTAL -762.79

Bill Pmt -Check 15847 03/05/2021 Comptel Services 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 112021 02/15/2021 66001 ꞏ Phone / Internet Expense -92.00 TOTAL -92.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15848 03/05/2021 Esparza Enterprises, Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 92973 02/24/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -1,721.07 Bill 93171 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services -2,105.78 TOTAL -3,826.85

Bill Pmt -Check 15849 03/05/2021 Gary Unruh 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill Feb 2021 02/24/2021 62007 ꞏ Directors' Fees -623.07 TOTAL -623.07

Bill Pmt -Check 15850 03/05/2021 Greg Garcia Professional Window Washing 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 1167 02/25/2021 65100 ꞏ Building Maintenance -270.00 TOTAL -270.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15851 03/05/2021 Groundwater Banking JPA 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 2021-2 03/01/2021 Grounwater Banking JPA 61400 ꞏ Third Party Project Operations -2,500.00 TOTAL -2,500.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15852 03/05/2021 Jason Selvidge 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill Feb 21 02/09/2021 62007 ꞏ Directors' Fees -343.46 TOTAL -343.46

Bill Pmt -Check 15853 03/05/2021 Jordan Kaufman - KCTTC 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 04/12/21 160-010-42 03/03/2021 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -10,198.49 Bill 04/12/21 160-010-39 03/03/2021 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -5,278.69

Page 5 of 7 2:23 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accounts Payable Report February 6 through March 5, 2021

Type Num Date Name Account Paid Amount Bill 04/12/21 321-020-02 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -283.86 Bill 04/12/21 321-020-05 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -226.34 Bill 04/12/21 426-032-10 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -735.08 Bill 04/12/21 426-032-13 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -1,659.82 Bill 04/12/21 426-100-08 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -3,875.39 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-02 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -6,127.57 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-05 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -5,591.55 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-11 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -619.96 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-12 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -20.19 Bill 04/12/21321-030-13 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -5,705.52 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-15 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -83.32 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-16 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -2,916.84 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-17 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -6,506.58 Bill 04/12/21 321-030-21 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -5,350.43 Bill 04/12/21 321-040-03 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -3,743.29 Bill 04/12/21 321-040-04 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -840.50 Bill 04/12/21 321-040-10 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -353.98 Bill 04/12/21 321-061-01 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -132.05 Bill 04/12/21 321-061-05 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -299.26 Bill 04/12/21 321-181-01 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -403.44 Bill 04/12/21 426-032-11 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -2,074.38 Bill 04/12/21 426-032-12 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -5,352.71 Bill 04/12/21 426-032-14 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -4,063.27 Bill 04/12/21 426-034-10 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -147.98 Bill 04/12/21 426-035-02 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -695.17 Bill 04/12/21 426-080-04 03/03/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property -278.71 TOTAL -73,564.37

Bill Pmt -Check 15854 03/05/2021 Kern County Water Agency 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 37381 03/01/2021 61400 ꞏ Third Party Project Operations -535.00 Bill 37367 03/01/2021 61400 ꞏ Third Party Project Operations -78,626.00 TOTAL -79,161.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15855 03/05/2021 Kern Groundwater Authority 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill KG202159 02/25/2021 RRBWSD:SGMA 61450 ꞏ Regulatory Program Compliance -5,085.23 TOTAL -5,085.23

Bill Pmt -Check 15856 03/05/2021 L&M Lumber 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill K26330 02/28/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 65100 ꞏ Building Maintenance -45.83 TOTAL -45.83

Bill Pmt -Check 15857 03/05/2021 Martinez Gardening Service 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 222648 02/24/2021 65100 ꞏ Building Maintenance -200.00 TOTAL -200.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15858 03/05/2021 Mission Uniform Service 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 514273763 02/26/2021 63500 ꞏ Janitorial Expense -131.29 TOTAL -131.29

Bill Pmt -Check 15859 03/05/2021 Mitch Millwee 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill Feb 2021 02/09/2021 62007 ꞏ Directors' Fees -203.36 TOTAL -203.36

Bill Pmt -Check 15860 03/05/2021 Nestle Waters North America Inc. 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 11B0018605261 02/28/2021 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -3.22 TOTAL -3.22

Bill Pmt -Check 15861 03/05/2021 P & J Electric, Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 7041 02/23/2021 RRBWSD-IRWD:SUP Wells 70100 ꞏ Capital Booster Pump -1,274.55 TOTAL -1,274.55

Bill Pmt -Check 15862 03/05/2021 PG&E (4831125987-2) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Page 6 of 7 2:23 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accounts Payable Report February 6 through March 5, 2021

Type Num Date Name Account Paid Amount

Bill 4831125987-2 Mar21 03/02/2021 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense -36,211.63 TOTAL -36,211.63

Bill Pmt -Check 15863 03/05/2021 Rosedale-Rio Bravo W.S.D. Payroll 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill Mar 2021 Payroll 03/01/2021 10001 ꞏ Payroll- Wells Fargo -255,000.00 TOTAL -255,000.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15864 03/05/2021 ROSEDALE AUTOMOTIVE INC 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 74249 02/25/2021 65000 ꞏ Auto and Truck Maint. & Repair -115.00 TOTAL -115.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15865 03/05/2021 Roy Pierucci 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill Feb 2021 02/24/2021 62007 ꞏ Directors' Fees -1,173.25 TOTAL -1,173.25

Bill Pmt -Check 15866 03/05/2021 Safeguard Business Systems 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 034446163 02/25/2021 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense -460.61 TOTAL -460.61

Bill Pmt -Check 15867 03/05/2021 Sitka Technology Group 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 2101302 02/05/2021 RRBWSD:SGMA 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions -37,375.00 TOTAL -37,375.00

Bill Pmt -Check 15868 03/05/2021 SoCalGas 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 11021673006 Feb 21 02/19/2021 66000 ꞏ Utilities -80.35 TOTAL -80.35

Bill Pmt -Check 15869 03/05/2021 SUPERIOR SANITATION 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 13100301 03/01/2021 66000 ꞏ Utilities -188.89 TOTAL -188.89

Bill Pmt -Check 15870 03/05/2021 Thomas Harder & Co., Inc. 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 20-054-127.2 03/03/2021 CLWA = Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency:SCVW63006 ꞏ Hydrogeology Consultants -840.00 Bill 20-054-123.7 03/03/2021 JOC:JOC 63006 ꞏ Hydrogeology Consultants -2,507.50 TOTAL -3,347.50

Bill Pmt -Check 15871 03/05/2021 Thomas Refuse Service, Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 13101989 03/01/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -80.36 Bill 13101757 03/01/2021 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 66000 ꞏ Utilities -186.84 TOTAL -267.20

Bill Pmt -Check 15872 03/05/2021 Tyack's Tire Inc 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 205249 02/22/2021 65001 ꞏ Equip. Maint. & Repair -156.33 TOTAL -156.33

Bill Pmt -Check 15873 03/05/2021 United Rentals 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 190483866-001 02/21/2021 61500 ꞏ Equipment Rental Expense -4,632.60 RRBWSD:Onyx Ranch 61500 ꞏ Equipment Rental Expense -1,544.20 TOTAL -6,176.80

Bill Pmt -Check 15874 03/05/2021 ACWA - JPIA (BENEFITS) 10000 ꞏ General Account- Wells Fargo

Bill 0663629 02/27/2021 60005 ꞏ Benefits Health,Dent.Life.Vis.D -18,874.29 TOTAL -18,874.29

Total AP Current -577,138.46

Total AP Current + Ratified ‐925,800.49

Page 7 of 7 3:32 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accrual Basis Revenue and Expenditures January through February 2021

TOTAL Feb 21 Jan - Feb 21 Budget % of Budget Ordinary Income/Expense Income 40000 ꞏ Assesment Income 329,267.69 369,623.71 3,900,000.00 9.48% 40010 ꞏ Prior Year Assesment Income 890.64 1,907.26 11,000.00 17.34% 40501 ꞏ Water Sales 0.00 0.00 7,830,720.00 0.0% 40503 ꞏ SW Pumping Reimbursement 195,304.84 541,817.84 100,000.00 541.82% X 40506 ꞏ Groundwater Mitigation Income 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.0% 40507 ꞏ O & M Reimbursement Income 40,143.15 46,284.14 200,000.00 23.14% 40508 ꞏ Groundwater Banking Income 0.00 2,442,242.00 4,845,000.00 50.41% 40509 ꞏ Lease Income 30,785.20 55,936.08 80,000.00 69.92% 40510 ꞏ Groundwater Recovery Reimb. 109,447.51 109,447.51 4,000,000.00 2.74% 40600 ꞏ Interest Income 10,653.58 18,069.20 75,000.00 24.09% 41000 ꞏ Other Income 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.0% 41001 ꞏ Refunds and Credits 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.0% 41005 ꞏ Income from Sale of Asset 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.0% 41010 ꞏ Grant Income 0.00 0.00 700,000.00 0.0% 41050 ꞏ Resource Management Income 24,788.60 59,780.97 250,000.00 23.91% 45000 ꞏ Capital Reimbursement Income 1,079.96 453,527.54 100,000.00 453.53% Total Income 742,361.17 4,098,636.25 22,511,720.00 18.21% Gross Profit 742,361.17 4,098,636.25 22,511,720.00 18.21% Expense 60000 ꞏ Wages and Salaries Expense 104,360.78 209,970.19 1,600,000.00 13.12% 60001 ꞏ Payroll Expense 1,996.91 5,199.60 40,000.00 13.0% 60005 ꞏ Benefits Health,Dent.Life.Vis.D 34,916.80 50,005.95 185,000.00 27.03% 60006 ꞏ Benefits- CalPers Retirement 16,630.98 33,261.88 190,000.00 17.51% 60007 ꞏ Workers Compensation Insurance 2,110.43 4,284.57 34,500.00 12.42% 60008 ꞏ Retirement-457B Nationwide Exp 853.18 1,706.36 12,000.00 14.22% 60110 ꞏ Assesment Expense 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 0.0% 60200 ꞏ Licenses, Permits and Fees 19.95 3,565.20 8,000.00 44.57% 61000 ꞏ KCWA SWP Expense 0.00 2,378,746.00 4,200,000.00 56.64% 61001 ꞏ City of Bak. Basic Contract Exp 0.00 37,860.00 85,000.00 44.54% 61050 ꞏ Other Water Purch Expense 0.00 11,840.00 500,000.00 2.37% 61300 ꞏ SW Pumping Expense 98.44 16,542.48 200,000.00 8.27% 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense 476,096.23 890,438.95 5,200,000.00 17.12% 61350 ꞏ Groundwater Mitigation Expense 0.00 0.00 130,000.00 0.0% 61400 ꞏ Third Party Project Operations 0.00 582,225.43 1,649,000.00 35.31% 61450 ꞏ Regulatory Program Compliance 5,085.23 20,677.70 125,000.00 16.54% 61500 ꞏ Equipment Rental Expense 9,630.87 9,630.87 50,000.00 19.26% 61650 ꞏ Operating Supplies 425.71 1,820.90 30,000.00 6.07% 61655 ꞏ Water Quality Testing 190.00 5,889.00 55,000.00 10.71% 61660 ꞏ Property Lease Expense 0.00 296,697.32 100,000.00 296.7% 61800 ꞏ Fuel 4,278.77 12,969.88 75,000.00 17.29% 62000 ꞏ General Office Expense 1,123.53 3,613.35 20,000.00 18.07% 62001 ꞏ Printing & Reproduction 0.00 8,643.41 15,000.00 57.62% 62003 ꞏ Publications and Notices 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.0% 62005 ꞏ Dues and Membership 500.00 38,102.06 90,650.00 42.03% 62007 ꞏ Directors' Fees 2,443.70 7,324.92 35,000.00 20.93% 62008 ꞏ Educational Expenses 0.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.0% 62009 ꞏ Postage and Delivery 93.00 339.94 2,575.00 13.2% 63000 ꞏ Legal Services 54,130.69 54,130.69 650,000.00 8.33% 63002 ꞏ Audit and Accounting Services 0.00 360.00 36,225.00 0.99% 63004 ꞏ Engineering Services 1,327.30 1,327.30 50,000.00 2.66% 63005 ꞏ Environmental Consultants 11,507.50 24,691.00 150,000.00 16.46% 63006 ꞏ Hydrogeology Consultants 6,597.50 16,807.50 50,000.00 33.62% 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services 11,337.06 17,422.87 150,000.00 11.62% 63010 ꞏ GL/Property/Auto Insurance Prem 0.00 340.00 47,000.00 0.72% 63500 ꞏ Janitorial Expense 800.18 1,774.23 9,500.00 18.68%

Page 1 of 2 3:32 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accrual Basis Revenue and Expenditures January through February 2021

TOTAL Feb 21 Jan - Feb 21 Budget % of Budget

64000 ꞏ Water Transaction Fees 0.00 10,700.00 50,000.00 21.4% 65000 ꞏ Auto and Truck Maint. & Repair 417.99 1,659.48 30,000.00 5.53% 65001 ꞏ Equip. Maint. & Repair 2,936.95 8,333.89 45,000.00 18.52% 65002 ꞏ Mileage Reimbursement Expense 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.0% 65100 ꞏ Building Maintenance 852.01 1,152.01 15,000.00 7.68% 65101 ꞏ Water Structure Maintenance 0.00 224.50 20,000.00 1.12% 65200 ꞏ Booster Pump Maintenance Exp. 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.0% 65201 ꞏ Well Maintenance Expense 2,528.34 2,782.30 125,000.00 2.23% 65500 ꞏ Weed Contol/Chemicals 19.81 12,603.77 100,000.00 12.6% 66000 ꞏ Utilities 968.71 1,924.46 15,000.00 12.83% 66001 ꞏ Phone / Internet Expense 1,226.81 2,509.71 20,000.00 12.55% 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions 38,158.80 45,400.34 60,000.00 75.67% 67000 ꞏ Travel Expense 0.00 145.77 35,000.00 0.42% 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.0% 70000 ꞏ Capital Water Structure Expense 129,100.13 129,100.13 2,935,000.00 4.4% 70001 ꞏ Capital Building Expense 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.0% 70100 ꞏ Capital Booster Pump 3,257.64 3,257.64 25,000.00 13.03% 70101 ꞏ Capital Well Expenses 5,000.00 56,656.75 200,000.00 28.33% 70200 ꞏ Capital Engineering Consult Exp 0.00 5,999.50 420,000.00 1.43% 70201 ꞏ Capital Environmental Cons Exp. 4,416.00 4,416.00 50,000.00 8.83% 70500 ꞏ Capital - Auto and Truck Exp. 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.0% 70501 ꞏ Capital Equipment Expense 0.00 0.00 160,000.00 0.0% 70600 ꞏ Capital Office Equipment Expens 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.0% 70602 ꞏ Capital Land Expense 0.00 0.00 266,097.00 0.0% 88004 ꞏ 2020 COP- Debt Service Expense 133,752.90 267,505.80 3,931,523.00 6.8% 88100 ꞏ COP Administration Expense 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% Total Expense 1,069,190.83 5,302,581.60 24,627,570.00 21.53% Net Income -326,829.66 -1,203,945.35 -2,115,850.00 56.9%

Page 2 of 2 3:43 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Budget vs. Actual January through February 2021 Total Onyx Ranch (RRBWSD) Jan - Feb 21 Budget % of Budget

Ordinary Income/Expense Income 40509 ꞏ Lease Income 51,585.20 75,000.00 68.78% 41005 ꞏ Income from Sale of Asset 0.00 200,000.00 0.0% Total Income 51,585.20 275,000.00 18.76% Gross Profit 51,585.20 275,000.00 18.76% Expense 60000 ꞏ Wages and Salaries Expense 20,749.93 120,000.00 17.29% 60001 ꞏ Payroll Expense 572.27 2,500.00 22.89% 60005 ꞏ Benefits Health,Dent.Life.Vis.D 347.46 4,500.00 7.72% 60006 ꞏ Benefits- CalPers Retirement 0.00 4,000.00 0.0% 60007 ꞏ Workers Compensation Insurance 539.30 3,000.00 17.98% 60110 ꞏ Assesment Expense 0.00 500.00 0.0% 60200 ꞏ Licenses, Permits and Fees 3,495.25 500.00 699.05% 61300 ꞏ SW Pumping Expense 0.00 15,000.00 0.0% 61301 ꞏ GW Well Pumping Expense 279.49 1,000.00 27.95% 61500 ꞏ Equipment Rental Expense 2,238.93 5,000.00 44.78% 61650 ꞏ Operating Supplies 441.40 10,000.00 4.41% 61655 ꞏ Water Quality Testing 0.00 1,000.00 0.0% 61800 ꞏ Fuel 2,451.10 9,000.00 27.23% 62001 ꞏ Printing & Reproduction 0.00 500.00 0.0% 62003 ꞏ Publications and Notices 0.00 500.00 0.0% 62005 ꞏ Dues and Membership 0.00 200.00 0.0% 62009 ꞏ Postage and Delivery 0.00 500.00 0.0% 63000 ꞏ Legal Services 23,945.75 150,000.00 15.96% 63004 ꞏ Engineering Services 0.00 10,000.00 0.0% 63005 ꞏ Environmental Consultants 24,691.00 100,000.00 24.69% 63006 ꞏ Hydrogeology Consultants 0.00 10,000.00 0.0% 63007 ꞏ Other Contracted Services 3,676.54 80,000.00 4.6% 63500 ꞏ Janitorial Expense 0.00 600.00 0.0% 65000 ꞏ Auto and Truck Maint. & Repair 243.01 3,000.00 8.1% 65001 ꞏ Equip. Maint. & Repair 0.00 7,500.00 0.0% 65100 ꞏ Building Maintenance 45.83 9,000.00 0.51% 65101 ꞏ Water Structure Maintenance 224.50 65200 ꞏ Booster Pump Maintenance Exp. 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% 65201 ꞏ Well Maintenance Expense 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% 65500 ꞏ Weed Contol/Chemicals 0.00 1,000.00 0.0% 66000 ꞏ Utilities 1,363.94 7,000.00 19.49% 66001 ꞏ Phone / Internet Expense 83.71 700.00 11.96% 66011 ꞏ Technology Fees & Subscriptions 0.00 500.00 0.0% 67000 ꞏ Travel Expense 145.77 68000 ꞏ Taxes - Property 0.00 116,000.00 0.0% 70000 ꞏ Capital Water Structure Expense 0.00 15,000.00 0.0%

Page 1 of 2 3:43 PM Rosedale- Rio Bravo WSD 03/05/21 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Budget vs. Actual January through February 2021 Total Onyx Ranch (RRBWSD) Jan - Feb 21 Budget % of Budget

70001 ꞏ Capital Building Expense 0.00 10,400.00 0.0% 70100 ꞏ Capital Booster Pump 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% 70101 ꞏ Capital Well Expenses 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% 70200 ꞏ Capital Engineering Consult Exp 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% 70501 ꞏ Capital Equipment Expense 0.00 5,000.00 0.0% Total Expense 85,535.18 728,400.00 11.74%

Net Income -33,949.98 -453,400.00 7.49%

Page 2 of 2 0!2

0!1

0!3 0!4

05

! 1!6 06

1!8 08 ! 17 0!7 0!9 10 ! 31 15 13 1!9 2!4 1!4 1!2 3!0 ! 21 11 23 25 2!6 2!7 33 3!5 28 ! 34 3!7 22 3!2 3!6 ! 20 2!9 3!8

42 40 3!9 41

ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT µ MONTHLY GROUNDWATER LEVEL MONITORING RUN ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT MONTHLY GROUNDWATER DEPTHS 2021

Map No. Date Well Name JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Month Δ Year Δ

01 29S/24E-02J01 Bushnell 323.1 321.4 327.5 -6.1 ---

02 29S/25E-05C01 Haag 320.6 318.2 318.1 0.1 1.9

03 29S/25E-03N01 L.R. Stout 302.8 304.6 306.4 -1.8 -1.4

04 29S/25E-02Q Rosedale Auto ------0.0 ------

05 29S/25E-11H RBG School 281.3 281.2 282.0 -0.8 1.2

06 29S/25E-14C01 P. Enns Domestic 270.0 271.0 278.0 -7.0 -6.4

07 29S/26E-19G Gardiner NEW 235.0 234.9 238.8 -3.9 -8.0

08 29S/26E-17R Unruh 228.7 227.7 229.0 -1.3 ---

09 29S/26E-23J01 Chet Reed 185.2 185.0 183.4 1.6 2.3

10 29S/26E-24L Brock North 184.4 184.0 182.7 1.3 0.3

11 29S/26E-25G Brock South 178.0 179.0 176.7 2.3 -0.9

12 29S/26E-28E Ron Bartel 196.6 195.9 196.5 -0.6 -5.5

13 29S/26E-29B Home Place 214.4 213.6 216.3 -2.7 -7.3

14 29S/26E-29E Wyer --- 195.0 197.8 -2.8 ---

15 29S/25E-27A McCaslin Home 203.0 204.1 211.9 -7.8 -26.7

16 29S/25E-18B01 Section 18 265.1 266.5 268.5 -2.0 5.8

17 29S/24E-24F BLACCO HQ - NEW 248.0 249.5 249.8 -0.3 5.2

18 29S/24E-21A01 Cauzza 262.2 262.5 266.7 -4.2 -1.7

19 29S/24E-28L Parsons 211.7 211.3 219.3 -8.0 -4.8

20 29S/24E-36R01 West I-5 197.4 200.0 201.0 -1.0 -3.6

21 29S/25E-29Q WB-1 Prod. 297.1 302.0 304.0 -2.0 ---

22 29S/25E-36E01 Virgil Bussell 183.8 187.3 191.8 -4.5 -1.3

23 29S/25E-28N WB-2 Prod. 206.4 254.0 257.0 -3.0 ---

24 29S/25E-28L Blacco Well 197.4 196.0 206.0 -10.0 -41.0

25 29S/25E-28P WB-3 Prod. 282.0 287.3 295.3 -8.0 ---

29S/25E-27N01 27N Mayer Deep-W 209.7 219.5 233.5 -14.0 -31.7 26 29S/25E-27N02 27N Mayer Shal.-E 181.8 185.0 191.7 -6.7 -37.7

27 29S/25E-34C Fast Domestic 170.3 174.1 182.0 -7.9 -44.0

29S/25E-34A ENNS-01 Prod. 182.0 323.9 320.0 3.9 ---

28 29S/25E-34A2 ENNS-02 Prod. 210.0 292.8 308.3 -15.5 ---

29S/25E-34H ENNS-03 Prod. 167.7 265.0 290.6 -25.6 ---

1 of 2 ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT MONTHLY GROUNDWATER DEPTHS 2021

Map No. Date Well Name JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Month Δ Year Δ

29 29S/25E-34R Richard Enns 172.2 181.6 192.2 -10.6 -55.9

29S/25E-25M01 25M Enos Deep-W 258.2 263.0 278.9 -15.9 -63.0 30 29S/25E-25M02 25M Enos Shal.-E 177.0 178.7 183.3 -4.6 -43.3

31 29S/25E-24N Golden Bull 210.5 211.5 215.7 -4.2 -34.7

29S/26E-31H01 31H Greeley Deep-E 200.0 214.1 244.0 -29.9 -68.6 32 29S/26E-31H02 31H Greeley Shal-W 179.9 186.2 203.8 -17.6 -50.5

33 29S/26E-33F Dave Williams --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---

34 29S/26E-33D Duhn ------0.0 ------

35 29S/26E-33B 4D Ranch 189.0 191.0 197.8 -6.8 -18.0

36 29S/26E-34M01 Harvest Ranch 166.2 171.8 176.8 -5.0 -22.8

29S/26E-35H01 Shop ------0.0 ------

37 29S/26E-35H03 35H Shop Deep-SE 161.8 165.0 162.0 3.0 -1.2

29S/26E-35H04 35H Shop Shal-NW 159.1 163.7 159.0 4.7 -2.0

38 29S/26E-35R01 Stockdale Ranchos 153.6 167.7 154.0 13.7 3.4

39 30S/25E-02J03 Strand Old Ag 121.4 126.8 136.4 -9.6 -70.4

30S/25E-02E SREX-01 Prod. 288.7 313.7 327.8 Pumping -128.8

30S/25E-02D SREX-02 Prod. 315.8 335.6 340.7 Pumping -55.7 40 30S/25E-02G SREX-03 Prod. 343.7 357.6 368.0 Pumping -55.0

30S/25E-02A SREX-04 Prod. 381.6 0.0 400.0 Pumping -44.9

30S/25E-02L SREX-05 Prod. 323.5 348.7 378.0 Pumping -66.0 41 30S/25E-02J04? SREX-07 Prod. 319.0 333.8 357.0 Pumping -6.3

30S/25E-03--- SWEX-1 343.0 361.0 367.4 Pumping ---

42 30S/25E-03--- SWEX-2 217.7 242.0 260.3 -18.3 -72.5

30S/25E-03--- SWEX-3 390.0 0.0 374.6 Pumping 29.4 Monthly Average > 246.3 ft. True Monthly Δ > -4.8 ft.

2 of 2 R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E ÿÿ|ÿ99 RRBMA MONITORING ZONES FOR WATER LEVEL WELLS

Shafter A! Water Level Well )A! RRBMA Water Level Well T28S Fr ia T28S nt-Ke |ÿ65 Proposed Monitoring Zones rn C ÿÿ ana l East Zone

South Zone

A! Central Zone

North Zone )A! )A! South of River Zone )A! All Other Features )A! )A! Highway Bakersfield A Waterway T29S )! ÿÿ|ÿ58 A! )A! A! T29S )A! A! A! A! )A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! ) A! )A! A! A! ) A! A! ÿÿ|ÿ43 A! )A! )A! A! )A! )A! A! )A! A! r A!A!A!A!A! A! Rive A! A! Cross Valley Canal ern A! A! K

A rv in A! - E ¯± d i

T30S s o n 0 1.5 3 6 C T30S Extensometer a n Miles al )A! Kern River Rosedale-Rio Bravo Management Area Kern County, California ¨¦§5 ÿÿ|ÿ119 )A! Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD

t uc ued Aq T31S nia lifor T31S Ca

DECEMBER 2019 FIGURE 1

31-May-2019 Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd RS Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd 31-May-2019 R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E RMW-052 North Monitoring Zone 29S25E03N001M L.R. Stout 450.0

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION (ft, msl) 350.0 MINIMUM THRESHOLD (MT) MEASUREABLE OBJECTIVE (MO)

250.0

150.0

50.0 Groundwater Elevation (feet, msl) (feet, Elevation Groundwater

-50.0

-150.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 WATER YEAR R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E ÿÿ|ÿ99 RRBMA MONITORING ZONES FOR WATER LEVEL WELLS

Shafter A! Water Level Well )A! RRBMA Water Level Well T28S Fr ia T28S nt-Ke |ÿ65 Proposed Monitoring Zones rn C ÿÿ ana l East Zone

South Zone

A! Central Zone

North Zone )A! )A! South of River Zone )A! All Other Features )A! )A! Highway Bakersfield A Waterway T29S )! ÿÿ|ÿ58 A! )A! A! T29S )A! A! A! A! )A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! ) A! )A! A! A! ) A! A! ÿÿ|ÿ43 A! )A! )A! A! )A! )A! A! )A! A! r A!A!A!A!A! A! Rive A! A! Cross Valley Canal ern A! A! K

A rv in A! - E ¯± d i

T30S s o n 0 1.5 3 6 C T30S Extensometer a n Miles al )A! Kern River Rosedale-Rio Bravo Management Area Kern County, California ¨¦§5 ÿÿ|ÿ119 )A! Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD

t uc ued Aq T31S nia lifor T31S Ca

DECEMBER 2019 FIGURE 1

31-May-2019 Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd RS Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd 31-May-2019 R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E RMW-055 Central Monitoring Zone 29S25E18B001M Section 18 450.0

400.0 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION (ft, msl) MINIMUM THRESHOLD (MT) 350.0 MEASUREABLE OBJECTIVE (MO)

300.0

250.0

200.0

150.0 Groundwater Elevation (feet, msl) (feet, Elevation Groundwater

100.0

50.0

0.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 WATER YEAR

R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E ÿÿ|ÿ99 RRBMA MONITORING ZONES FOR WATER LEVEL WELLS

Shafter A! Water Level Well )A! RRBMA Water Level Well T28S Fr ia T28S nt-Ke |ÿ65 Proposed Monitoring Zones rn C ÿÿ ana l East Zone

South Zone

A! Central Zone

North Zone )A! )A! South of River Zone )A! All Other Features )A! )A! Highway Bakersfield A Waterway T29S )! ÿÿ|ÿ58 A! )A! A! T29S )A! A! A! A! )A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! ) A! )A! A! A! ) A! A! ÿÿ|ÿ43 A! )A! )A! A! )A! )A! A! )A! A! r A!A!A!A!A! A! Rive A! A! Cross Valley Canal ern A! A! K

A rv in A! - E ¯± d i

T30S s o n 0 1.5 3 6 C T30S Extensometer a n Miles al )A! Kern River Rosedale-Rio Bravo Management Area Kern County, California ¨¦§5 ÿÿ|ÿ119 )A! Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD

t uc ued Aq T31S nia lifor T31S Ca

DECEMBER 2019 FIGURE 1

31-May-2019 Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd RS Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd 31-May-2019 R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E RMW-060 South Monitoring Zone 29S25E36E001M Virgil Bussell 450.0

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION 400.0 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION (ft, msl) MINIMUM THRESHOLD (MT) MEASUREABLE OBJECTIVE (MO) 350.0

300.0

250.0

200.0

150.0 Groundwater Elevation (feet, msl) (feet, Elevation Groundwater

100.0

50.0

0.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 WATER YEAR R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E ÿÿ|ÿ99 RRBMA MONITORING ZONES FOR WATER LEVEL WELLS

Shafter A! Water Level Well )A! RRBMA Water Level Well T28S Fr ia T28S nt-Ke |ÿ65 Proposed Monitoring Zones rn C ÿÿ ana l East Zone

South Zone

A! Central Zone

North Zone )A! )A! South of River Zone )A! All Other Features )A! )A! Highway Bakersfield A Waterway T29S )! ÿÿ|ÿ58 A! )A! A! T29S )A! A! A! A! )A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! ) A! )A! A! A! ) A! A! ÿÿ|ÿ43 A! )A! )A! A! )A! )A! A! )A! A! r A!A!A!A!A! A! Rive A! A! Cross Valley Canal ern A! A! K

A rv in A! - E ¯± d i

T30S s o n 0 1.5 3 6 C T30S Extensometer a n Miles al )A! Kern River Rosedale-Rio Bravo Management Area Kern County, California ¨¦§5 ÿÿ|ÿ119 )A! Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD

t uc ued Aq T31S nia lifor T31S Ca

DECEMBER 2019 FIGURE 1

31-May-2019 Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd RS Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd 31-May-2019 R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E RMW-065b East Monitoring Zone 29S26E31H001M Greeley Deep 450.0

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION 400.0 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION (ft, msl) MINIMUM THRESHOLD (MT) MEASUREABLE OBJECTIVE (MO) 350.0

300.0

250.0

200.0

150.0 Groundwater Elevation (feet, msl) (feet, Elevation Groundwater

100.0

50.0

0.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 WATER YEAR R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E ÿÿ|ÿ99 RRBMA MONITORING ZONES FOR WATER LEVEL WELLS

Shafter A! Water Level Well )A! RRBMA Water Level Well T28S Fr ia T28S nt-Ke |ÿ65 Proposed Monitoring Zones rn C ÿÿ ana l East Zone

South Zone

A! Central Zone

North Zone )A! )A! South of River Zone )A! All Other Features )A! )A! Highway Bakersfield A Waterway T29S )! ÿÿ|ÿ58 A! )A! A! T29S )A! A! A! A! )A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! ) A! )A! A! A! ) A! A! ÿÿ|ÿ43 A! )A! )A! A! )A! )A! A! )A! A! r A!A!A!A!A! A! Rive A! A! Cross Valley Canal ern A! A! K

A rv in A! - E ¯± d i

T30S s o n 0 1.5 3 6 C T30S Extensometer a n Miles al )A! Kern River Rosedale-Rio Bravo Management Area Kern County, California ¨¦§5 ÿÿ|ÿ119 )A! Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD

t uc ued Aq T31S nia lifor T31S Ca

DECEMBER 2019 FIGURE 1

31-May-2019 Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd RS Z:\Projects\1605450_RRBWSD_ET_Parcel\RRBMA_WaterLevelWells_8x11.mxd 31-May-2019 R23E R24E R25E R26E R27E RMW-069b South of River Zone 30S26E28J002M 28J Triple (middle) 450.0

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION 400.0 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION (ft, msl) MINIMUM THRESHOLD (MT) MEASUREABLE OBJECTIVE (MO) 350.0

300.0

250.0

200.0

150.0 Groundwater Elevation (feet, msl) (feet, Elevation Groundwater

100.0

50.0

0.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 WATER YEAR ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT PROJECTED SUPPLY AND DEMAND 2021 (3/3/2021) All values in acre-feet 2021 SUPPLIES Source JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL 2020 Carryover 3,072 ------3,072 2021 SWP Table A 2,990 ------2,990 Recovered Groundwater 6,049 6,590 9,296 8,780 8,865 8,376 7,107 3,642 2,073 6,119 4,888 4,542 76,327 ------Monthly Supplies > 12,111 6,590 9,296 8,780 8,865 8,376 7,107 3,642 2,073 6,119 4,888 4,542 82,389

2021 PROJECTED DEMAND Return Partner JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL SCVWA/BVWSD - - 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 - - 1,100 1,100 1,000 650 8,250 SCVWA Banking 1,949 2,046 2,198 2,064 2,069 1,942 732 - - - - - 13,000 IRWD/BVWSD 2,560 121 ------2,681 Irvine Ranch WD - - - 1,500 1,000 - - 1,500 819 4,819 Delano-Earlimart ID - - 1,230 1,190 1,230 1,190 1,230 1,230 1,190 1,230 280 - 10,000 Arvin-Edison WSD - - 1,230 1,190 1,230 1,190 1,230 1,230 1,190 1,230 280 - 10,000 Kern-Tulare WD - - 922 893 922 893 922 922 893 922 893 818 9,000 San Joaquin River EC - - - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,015 - - - - - 4,015 Coachella Valley WD 2,375 2,375 ------2,375 2,375 9,500 Monthly Deliveries > 6,884 4,542 6,680 8,937 8,551 7,315 5,129 4,882 4,373 4,482 4,828 4,662 71,265

Monthly Change in Storage > (835) 2,048 2,616 (157) 314 1,061 1,978 (1,240) (2,300) 1,637 60 (120) SLR Balance @ Month End > 5,227 7,275 9,891 9,734 10,048 11,109 13,087 11,847 9,547 11,184 11,244 11,124

TO: Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Board of Directors Agenda Item 3.c

FROM: Zach Smith

DATE: March 9, 2021

RE: Maintenance Report

Discussion: Staff worked on several maintenance projects throughout the District in February. Specifically: • Herbicide applied in multiple locations throughout the District. • Staff continued to use Bobcat and tractor to clean channel from Wegis to Nord and the West Basins. • Backhoe and dozer used to clean and reshape slopes in Wes Selvidge Basin area. • Northern property line in Wes Selvidge Basin area was cleaned. Landowners asked to clean debris from District property. • Rye planting was completed on February 25th. Areas include portions of North and South Strand, Matuk, Enns, and West Basins. Approximately 500 acres planted. • Staff completed cleanup of panels on all recovery wells.

Cleaning and reshaping of basin area downstream of Houghton Weir.

Tumbleweed cleanup upstream of Nord Crossing – Before

Upstream of Nord Crossing - After

ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-01

DATE: March 09, 2021

Permittee: City of Bakersfield

Pursuant to your request, District hereby grants to the above-named permittee, to the extent its right, title and interest will allow, a non-exclusive and fully revocable permit to use and occupy certain real property (herein called "premises") for the purposes hereinafter stated and subject to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and provisions contained herein and in PART 1 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS and PART 2 - GENERAL PROVISIONS, each of which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.

This permit is to be strictly construed as to work and location, and no encroachment other than that specifically described herein is authorized hereby.

This permit is expressly conditioned upon the performance of the work in accordance with the specifications referenced herein. Failure to so perform shall constitute an immediate forfeiture of this permit without further notice.

ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT

BY:______

READ AND ACCEPTED:

BY:______Permittee

DATE:______

1 of 8 ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-01

PART 1 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS

1. Purpose: Encroaching on District property and installing a flowmeter at Rosedale Rio Bravo’s Kern River Intake for purposes of accurately measuring flowrates of surface water deliveries to the Goose Lake Slough, located east of Jewetta Ave and north of Stockdale Highway. 2. Location: Section 1, T30S, R26E Kern County, CA 3. Effective Date/Revocability: This encroachment permit will not become effective unless and until fully executed by all parties and returned to the District. District may completely revoke this encroachment permit at any time and for any purpose, with or without cause for revocation. 4. Completion of Construction: No work may commence until an encroachment permit has been fully executed and returned to the District. 5. Term: This encroachment permit is for flow meter installation operations only and will terminate at the completion of work and restoration of the property to the satisfaction of the District. 6. Surety Bond(s): None required. 7. Insurance: Bodily injury coverage shall be for not less than $1,000,000.00 per person and not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. Property damage coverage shall be for not less than $1,000,000.00. 8. Monetary Consideration: $500.

2 of 8

PART 1 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS (CONT.)

9. Requirements: a. This Permit allows Permittee to encroach upon District’s easement and facilities only. Permittee is responsible for independently obtaining its own easement rights, if necessary, from the owner(s) of the underlying fee simple interest as provided in Paragraph 18 of PART 2 – GENERAL PROVISIONS. b. Permittee to provide dust control, if necessary.

3 of 8 PART 2 - GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. Acceptance of Provisions: Permittee agrees that the performance of any work under this permit shall constitute an acceptance by Permittee of the provisions thereof. 2. Surety Bond(s): A Surety Bond or Bonds in such form and amounts as are satisfactory to the District may be required to insure performance in accordance with all the terms, conditions and restrictions hereof. Amounts of Bonds, if required, shall be as set forth in PART 1 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 3. Insurance: Permittee shall obtain and maintain during the term of this permit, at Permittee's sole cost and expense, public liability and property damage insurance, and any other insurance required by the District, in the amounts set forth in PART 1 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS. Said insurance shall be in a form and with companies satisfactory to District, shall cover the liability of Permittee under this permit, and shall name Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District, its officers, agents, servants and employees as additional insureds. 4. Consideration: As consideration for this encroachment permit, Permittee shall pay to District the amount or amounts set forth in PART 1 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS in the manner provided therein. 5. Notice: Prior to commencing any work at any site authorized herein, Permittee shall give at least three (3) days' notice to the District's Operations Manager or representative. 6. Permit on Work Site: This permit shall be kept on the premises during construction and upon request must be shown to any representative of District. 7. Satisfaction of District: All work to be performed hereunder shall be performed to the satisfaction of District.

4 of 8 PART 2 - GENERAL PROVISIONS (CONT.)

8. Protection of District Facilities: Permittee shall construct, maintain and repair any facilities authorized hereunder and shall exercise reasonable care in inspecting for and immediately repairing any injury to District facilities which occurs as a result of the existence of said encroachment or as the result of any work performed hereunder. 9. Handling District Surface Waters: Permittee is advised and understands that District's facilities may be used for delivering surface water as part of its groundwater recharge projects. Permittee shall be responsible for restoring District facilities so the handling of such flows to and through the premises is at no cost to the District. 10. Indemnification: Permittee agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District and its officers, agents, servants and employees free and harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, liens, demands and causes of action of every kind and character (including the amount of judgment, penalties, interest, court costs and legal fees incurred by District or its officers, agents, servants and employees in defense thereof) arising in favor of any party (including governmental agencies or bodies) on account of taxes, claims, liens, debts, personal injuries, or death (including injury to or death of officers, employees, servants and agents of District) or damages to property (including property of District and, without limitation by enumeration, all other claims or demands of every character occurring or in anywise incident to, in connection with, or arising directly or indirectly out of performance or non-performance by Permittee hereunder); excepting only claims arising out of accidents resulting from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of District. In the event of any damage caused by the concurring negligence or wrongful acts of the parties, the damage resulting therefrom shall be apportioned in accordance with the principles of comparative negligence. Permittee further agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, provide defense for and defend any such claim, demand or suit at its sole cost and expense, and agrees to bear all other costs and expenses related thereto even if the claim, demand or suit is groundless, false or fraudulent.

5 of 8 PART 2 - GENERAL PROVISIONS (CONT.)

11. Hazardous Material Cleanup, Indemnification, and Notice Permittee shall be solely responsible for the payment of all remediation and cleanup costs associated with the release, spill, or discharge of any hazardous substance upon the premises including, but not limited to, any oil or gas leak, spill or release. Permittee shall also be responsible for any and all cleanup costs necessary for compliance with any applicable State or Federal environmental law or regulation that arises as a result of Permitee's discharge, release or spill of a hazardous substance upon the premises. Permittee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District from and against all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, and costs, foreseen or unforeseen, including without limitation counsel, engineering, and other professional or expert fees, that either such entity may incur by reason of any release, spill, leak or discharge, and subsequent cleanup or remediation, of any hazardous substance upon the premises. Permittee shall promptly supply District with copies of all notices, reports, correspondence, and submissions made by Permittee to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or any other local, state, or federal authority that requires submission of any information concerning environmental matters or hazardous wastes or substances, Permittee shall also supply District with written confirmation of any notices or reports regarding releases of hazardous wastes or substances that Permittee makes orally or by telephone to any such governmental agency. 12. Restoration: Permittee shall restore the premises (including fencing) as nearly as possible to the same state they were in prior to any activity undertaken hereunder and, in any event, to a condition fully satisfactory to District. Said restoration shall be accomplished in a manner which does not adversely affect the capacity or flow characteristics and/or safety of District's facilities and rights of way.

6 of 8 PART 2 - GENERAL PROVISIONS (CONT.)

13. Relocation: At such time or times as, in the reasonable opinion of the District, the facilities constructed or installed hereunder interfere with District's reasonable use of or operations upon its rights of way or District desires to relocate or enlarge its facilities thereon, Permittee shall, at its own risk and expense, within forty-eight (48) hours after notice from District, relocate and/or reconstruct said facilities as specified by District in its notice and Permittee shall immediately thereafter restore the premises as provided in Paragraph 12 hereof. 14. Removal: Permittee agrees that, in the event this permit is terminated as provided in Paragraph 17 hereof, it will, upon request and at its sole expense and risk, remove all facilities placed by it in, over or upon the premises, and Permittee shall immediately thereafter restore said premises as provided in Paragraph 12 hereof. 15. No Interest in Real Property: It is agreed and understood that no interest in real property is conveyed hereby but merely the right of encroachment on the surface of the premises for the purposes stated herein. 16. No Precedent: This permit is granted with the understanding that no precedent shall be established with regard to permitting any certain kind of encroachment within District rights of way. 17. Termination: District may, at any time and upon twenty-four (24) hours’ notice, revoke and terminate this permit for any reason, with or without cause, as determined in the sole discretion of District.

7 of 8 PART 2 - GENERAL PROVISIONS (CONT.)

18. Other Permits: Permittee shall secure, whenever required by law, a written order or consent to performance of the work contemplated hereunder from any public board or body having jurisdiction, and this permit shall not be valid or effective until such order or consent is obtained. In addition, Permittee shall secure, whenever necessary the written permission of any other persons or entities having or claiming to have an interest in the premises prior to the start of construction, it being understood that District does not warrant or guaranty its title to said property nor the nature of its interest therein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this agreement the day and year first above written.

ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT

BY:______

APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:

BY:______Permittee

DATE:______

THE FULLY EXECUTED ORIGINAL MUST BE RETURNED TO THE OFFICE OF ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT BEFORE THIS PERMIT BECOMES EFFECTIVE

8 of 8 BENCH MARK CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 1. BRASS CAP STAMPED "CVC-26" ON THE SOUTH CORNER OF THE EAST ABUTMENT OF THE NORD ROAD BRIDGE OVER THE CROSS VALLEY CANAL, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SACRAMENTO ELEVATION=350.44 NGS, NAVD88. 2. USCGS BRASS

CAP STAMPED "X67 RESET", (FU1745) ON THE TOP OF SAN FRANCISCO CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CURB ON N.E. CORNER OF OAK STREET AND 19TH STREET, ELEVATION=403.74, NAVD88. PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FRESNO

BASIS OF BEARING KERN RIVER SCADA PROJECT KERN COUNTY

THE BASIS OF BEARING IN THE CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (NAD83), ZONE 5.

SAN DIEGO

CITY STANDARDS STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE FOLLOWING CITY STANDARDS DRAWINGS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED AS A PART OF THESE PLANS: ST-11 PAVEMENT PATCH

Basin 8 Headgate Basin 9 Culverts Basin 10 Headgate South

Aera Park Turnout Rosedale-Rio Bravo Canal Measuring Weir 2nd Point of Measurement Basin 2 Headgate Pioneer Canal Measuring Station First Point of Measurement Basin 1 Headgate Calloway Canal Measuring Station Berrenda Mesa Turnout Beardsley Measuring Point Alternate Second Point Levee 1 Measuring Station Reclamation Weir

River Canal Headgate Eastside Canal Headgate Farmers-Stine-Anderson Measuring Station

Stine Canal Measuring Station Buena Vista Canal Measuring Station Kern Island Canal Measuring Station N

CONSTRUCT KERN RIVER SCADA Site Name 2000 0 4000 8000 FACILITIES AT LOCATIONS LOCATION MAP Meter Point (Not a part of Project) DENOTED WITH STAR NOT TO SCALE 4000 1000 LIST OF DRAWINGS SHEET NUMBER SITES SHEET TITLE SHEET T1 ALL COVER AND TITLE SHEET LEGEND SHEET T2 ALL PROJECT KEY MAP SHEET G1 1ST POINT OF MEASUREMENT & BEARDSLEY MEASURING POINT GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITES "A" & "B" SECTION LINE BEARING AND DISTANCE SHEET G2 RECLAMATION WEIR & EASTSIDE CANAL HEADWORKS GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITES "C" & "E" CENTER LINE KERN ISLAND CANAL MEASURING STATION & CALLOWAY CANAL SHEET G3 GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITES "F" & "G" RIGHT-OF-WAY OR PROPERTY LINE MEASURING STATION SPECIFIED ELEVATION 100% PLAN RELEASE : 2-16-21 EXISTING FENCE FARMER-STINE-ANDERSON MEASURING STATION & STINE CANAL 2.00% FINISHED GRADE SLOPE SHEET G4 GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITES "H" & "I" EXISTING BLOCK WALL MEASURING STATION (2:1) SIDESLOPE RATE DESIGNATION (H:V) SHEET G5 RIVER CANAL HEADGATE GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITE "J" EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR 353 PIONEER CANAL MEASURING STATION, BERRENDA MESA TURNOUT & 11 SHEET G6 GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITE "L" EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY STATIONING LINE WITH STATION LABLE ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO CANAL MEASURING POINT EXISTING PAVEMENT EDGE PROPOSED INSTRUMENTATION CONDUIT AND CABLE(S) SHEET G7 BUENA VISTA CANAL MEASURING STATION & ALTERNATE 2ND POINT GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITES "K" & "S" SHEET PP1 EASTSIDE CANAL HEADWORKS EASTSIDE CANAL HEADGATE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY PROPOSED PULL BOX RECLAMATION WEIR, EASTSIDE CANAL HEADWORKS, KERN ISLAND CANAL EXISTING TOP OF BANK PROPOSED SONIC SENSOR MEASURING STATION, CALLOWAY CANAL MEASURING STATION, SHEET SB1 FARMER-STINE-ANDERSON MEASURING STATION, (PIONEER CANAL BLOCKHOUSE DETAILS APPROVED BY: PROPOSED SCADA BUILDING, SIZE SPECIFIED MEASURING STATION, BERRENDA MESA TURNOUT & ROSEDALE-RIO EXISTING TREE BRAVO CANAL MEASURING POINT - One Building) RECLAMATION WEIR, EASTSIDE CANAL HEADWORKS, KERN ISLAND CANAL PROPOSED OUTDOOR SCADA PANEL MEASURING STATION, CALLOWAY CANAL MEASURING STATION, SUBMITTED BY: EXISTING PIPELINE TOP OF BANK SHEET SB2 FARMER-STINE-ANDERSON MEASURING STATION, (PIONEER CANAL BUILDING DETAILS MEASURING STATION, BERRENDA MESA TURNOUT & ROSEDALE-RIO PROPOSED EMBANKMENT SLOPE BRAVO CANAL MEASURING POINT - One Building) ART CHIANELLO DATE EXISTING STRUCTURE WATER RESOURCES MANAGER TOE OF BANK BEARDSLEY MEASURING POINT, STINE CANAL MEASURING STATION & OUTDOOR SCADA PANEL AND CONDUIT RICHARD MEYER, R.C.E. 28104 DATE SHEET SB3 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ROCK RIPRAP BUENA VISTA CANAL MEASURING STATION TRENCH IN RIVER CHANNEL: USE ONLY VIRGIN QUARRIED ROCK 1ST POINT OF MEASUREMENT, BEARDSLEY MEASURING POINT, APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: OFF RIVER: SOUND BROKEN CONCRETE WITHOUT REBAR MAY BE USED RECLAMATION WEIR, EASTSIDE CANAL HEADWORKS, KERN ISLAND CANAL ABBREVIATIONS SECTION DESIGNATION: SHEET SW1 MEASURING STATION, CALLOWAY CANAL MEASURING STATION, STINE STILLING WELL MODIFICATIONS FL FLOWLINE EXIST. EXISTING SECTION LETTER CANAL MEASURING STATION, RIVER CANAL HEADGATE, PIONEER CANAL TC TOP OF CURB FG FINISHED GRADE A MEASURING STATION & BUENA VISTA CANAL MEASURING STATION R/W RIGHT OF WAY INV. INVERT SHEET MT1 BERRENDA MESA TURNOUT BMWD METER MANHOLE KRISTINA BUDAK DATE P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT F.F. FINISHED FLOOR SHEET WHERE SECTION IS 2 SHOWN EASTSIDE CANAL HEADWORKS, FARMER-STINE-ANDERSON MEASURING WATER RESOURCES DIRECTOR D.I. DUCTILE IRON M MATCH SHEET MT2 STATION, RIVER CANAL HEADGATE, BERRENDA MESA TURNOUT & SONIC IQ INSTALLATIONS File Name: WML20001TS1 RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE SCH. SCHEDULE DETAIL DESIGNATION: RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE C.M.LC. CEMENT MORTAR LINED & COATED ALTERNATE 2ND POINT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD S.D. STORM DRAIN HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYELTHYLENE DETAIL LETTER RRBWSD INTAKE SONTEK SL O A SHEET MT3 ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO CANAL MEASURING POINT Meyer WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT N T1 EL. ELEVATION O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER INSTALLATION Civil Engineering, Inc. OF ELEV. ELEVATION I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER KERN RIVER SCADA PROJECT SHEET WHERE DETAIL IS 2 8224 Espresso Dr., Ste. 100, Bakersfield, CA 93312 17 SHOWN CITY PROJECT NO: E9J105 Phone 661-836-9834 FAX 661-836-9761 CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHEETS KERN RIVER SCADA PROJECT - NO. E9J105 ROSEDALE-RIO 21 BRAVO INTAKE

CHANNEL INSTALL NEW ACOUSTIC SONTEC SL METER ON Date CANAL FLOW WEST WALL OF BOX

20 PER DETAIL A MT3

EXISTING 7' HIGH X 22' WIDE BOX CULVERT

19 IC

376 373 374 375 372 364 365 371 366 370 367 369368 374 368 PROVIDE PULL BOX

SEE DETAIL D Richard D. Meyer RCE 28104 18 366 365 364 MT1 367

360 363 362 361 EXISTING 24" RCP

IC 17

CROSS VALLEY CANAL IC 16

360

361 366

367

368 365 364 362 373 369

372 Civil Engineering, Inc. 374 Meyer

15 371

363 370 IC

364 365 366 367 368 14 369 370 KCWA PROPERTY 374 INSTALL CONDUIT FROM 371372 Phone 661-836-9834 FAX 661-836-9761 373 ACOUSTIC METER TO BLOCK 8224 Espresso Dr., Ste. 100, Bakersfield, CA 93312 374 370 373 IC HOUSE PER DETAIL F SB2 372

371 IC

13 374 PROVIDE PULL BOX 373 RDM RDM 370 SEE DETAIL D 372 371 MT1 IC 2316916.219 N 6224590.415 E FINISH FLOOR ELEV. 371.50

IC

12 CONSTRUCT NEW 100 SF BLOCK HOUSE ON IC USE "LB" FITTING KCWA PROPERTY 370 PREPARED BUILDING PAD WITH USE "LB" FITTING WITH PER DETAIL G UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND 371 SB1 SWEEP

INSTALL CONDUIT FROM STILLING 369 SWEEP IC WELL TO BLOCK HOUSE PER DETAIL F 374 369

11 SB2 373 RUN RIGID SURFACE CONDUIT 370 372

IC 369 371 OVER EXISTING WALKWAY, CLAMP 370 368 368 369 SECURELY TO WALKWAY 367 367 368 368 367 366 367 366 366 365 365 364 366 363 365 364 IC 362361 365 364 364 360 363 363 EXISTING AERA PARK KCWA PROPERTY 359358 362

10 362 HEADGATE

357 PIONEER CANAL PIONEER INTAKE EXISTING PIONEER CANAL 358 EXISTING PIONEER CANAL 362 CANAL FLOW

SHARP CRESTED WEIR HEADGATE CHANNEL FLOW IC

9 362 RUN RIGID SURFACE CONDUIT 363

OVER EXISTING WALKWAY, CLAMP 21 2-16-21 1-20-21 100% Plan Release 70% Design Submittal 358 364 IC 359 365 SECURELY TO WALKWAY 366 Rev. No. Date Revision Description Approved By 360361 367 368 362 363 369370 364 365 371 367 366 8 368 369 RDM INSTALL NEW SHAFT ENCODER IN RDM 370 2-16-21 EXISTING 12" DIAMETER STILLING WELL, WML-20-002

MODIFY EXISTING WELL PER DETAIL EXISTING BERRENDA WML20002BLD2 A AutoCAD File: File No: PM: Date: SW1 MESA HEADGATE Drawn By:

USE "LB" FITTING WITH IC 7 UNDERGROUND SWEEP

6 IC

INSTALL CONDUIT IN TRENCH FROM METER MANHOLE TO BLOCK HOUSE PER DETAIL F

5 SB2 IC 24' 4

BORE UNDER BIKE PATH. PROVIDE 30" MINIMUM COVER EXISTING BERREBDA MESA PIPELINE

3 EXISTING BIKE PATH IC

PROVIDE SAFE SAFETY SIGNAGE DURING CROSSING CONSTRUCTION KERN RIVER SCADA PROJECT N 2 USE "LB" FITTING WITH

UNDERGROUND SWEEP INSTALL NEW ACOUSTIC SONTEC PIPE GENERAL PLAN - PROJECT SITES "L" & "M" IQ IN EXIST. METER MANHOLE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WATER RESOURCES DEPT. EXISTING BIKE PATH PER DETAIL A MT1 SHEET NO. 1 SCALE: 1"=20' G6 10 0 20 40 PIONEER CANAL MEASURING STATION, BERRENDA MESA TURNOUT L OF 20 5 and ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO CANAL MEASURING POINT G6 17 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 0 3/8 3/16 3/32 1 0 2 3/8

N 3 3/4 MT3 B 4 5 6

SONIC BEAM

PLAN -RRBWSD INTAKE SONIC BEAM SONIC 7 EXIST. JOINT EXIST. JOINT PLAN -FOUNDATION SCALE: 3/8"= 1'-0" 8 END OF7'X22'BOXCULVERT SENSOR, SONTEKSLS.S.BRACKETSAND EXIST. REBARINBOXLID SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" FURNISH ANDINSTALLSONICFLOW FLOW 9". EPOXYDOWNLEGINTOEXISTING 5 EA.#5BARS"L"SPACEDAT 9 #5 BARS@12"EW-EF S.S. CONCRETEANCHORS EXIST. PICKPOINTS BOX CULVERTTOP8"MIN. 10 MT3 A MT3 D 11 12 5'-3"

C

MT3 1'-10 4 3 " 13

Ø2'-0" CORE DRILL 3" NEW MANHOLEFOUNDATION ROUTE CONDUITTHROUGH 14 14'-0" or AS REQUIRED BY HYDROGRAPHER 3'-0" SEE DETAIL PULL BOX,PLACE SOUTH OFFENCE 6'-0" BANK EXISTING TOPOF 15 SW1 D 16 17 18 FLOW SENSOR,SONTEKSLWITH FURNISH ANDINSTALLSONIC 7'-0" SONTEK GUIDERAILSYSTEM

1'-0" NEW MANHOLEFOUNDATION ROUTE CONDUITTHROUGH 19 REPLACE ROCKRIPRAP #5 BARS@12"EW-EF 20 EXISTING BOXINVERT 7' X22'BOXTOP 21 2'-0" COREDRILL SECTION -RRBWSDINTAKE 22 EXISTING TOPOFBANK

SECTION -RRBWSD INTAKE EXIST. JOINT MAX. FLOWW.S.(600CFS) 4'-0" 3

23 3'-2 "

8 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" 2'-0" 9'-5" NO FLOWW.S. SCALE: 3/8"= 1'-0" 22'-3 22'-0" 20'-0" EXIST. JOINT 2 1 ELEV. 356.80 " 9". EPOXYDOWNLEGINTOEXISTING MARKED "METER",AFFIXWITH CONTINUOUS SILICONGLUE/CAULKING CITY STD.MANHOLEANDFRAME, 5 EA.#5BARS"L"SPACEDAT HIGH STRENGTHMORTAR 24 1'-0" CONTINUOUS SILICONGLUE/CAULKING 6" GRADERINGS,AFFIXWITH SEAL CABLETOCONDUITEND

#5 BARS@12"EW-EF 8'-8" 1'-0" 1'-0" FLOW SENSOR,SONTEKSLWITH WITH WATERPROOFCLAMP BOX CULVERTTOP,8"MIN. FURNISH ANDINSTALLSONIC SONTEK GUIDERAILSYSTEM ELEV. 360.00

25 JUNCTION BOX SLOPE EMBANKMENT ADJACENT MT3 C FLOW MT3 B 7' X22'BOXTOP 26 1'-3" RAD. 27 2'-0" DIA.

28 END OF BOX CULVERT

1'-8" DOUBLE NUTTOPLUMBRAIL SYSTEM ANCHORS, 3"EMBEDMENT. ALL-THREAD S.S.EPOXY 1" RECESS MANHOLE FOUNDATION ROUTE 1"CONDUIT THROUGH NEW 29 PULL BOX,PLACE SOUTH OFFENCE 30

PM:

MT3 RDM SHEET NO. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WATER RESOURCES DEPT. Drawn By: RDM 17

OF Meyer AutoCAD File: KERN RIVER SCADA PROJECT WML20002BMW Civil Engineering, Inc. File No: 3 2-25-21 Revised per RRBWSD Comments RDM WML-20-002 2 2-16-21 100% Plan Release RDM 8224 Espresso Dr., Ste. 100, Bakersfield, CA 93312 RRBWSD INTAKE SONTEK SL INSTALLATION Date: 1 1-20-21 70% Design Submittal RDM Phone 661-836-9834 FAX 661-836-9761 Richard D. Meyer RCE 28104 Date 2-26-21 Rev. No. Date Revision Description Approved By DocuSign Envelope ID: 94DC6319-5E9C-4FCA-907B-ECACB7892017

AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 23rd day of February 2021, by and among Rosedale Rio- Bravo Water Storage District (Rosedale), Kern Delta Water District (Kern Delta), and Arvin-Edison Water Storage District (Arvin).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Kern Delta has an obligation to return up to 50,000 acre-feet of water to The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD); and

WHEREAS, Rosedale and Arvin have executed an Agreement for Storage and Extraction of Water (Arvin/Rosedale Agreement) dated October 1, 2009 that provides for the Return of Arvin Stored Water of up to 10,000 acre-feet to Arvin in 2021; and

WHEREAS, Kern Delta and Arvin have executed an Agreement Between Kern Delta Water District and Arvin- Edison Water Storage District for Construction, Ownership, and Operation of Groundwater Recovery Wells (Kern Delta/Arvin Agreement) dated January 1, 2009 that provides Kern Delta conveyance in Arvin’s Intake Canal; and

WHEREAS, Kern Delta, Rosedale, and Arvin desire to enter into an operational exchange of an equal amount of water to facilitate the obligations of Kern Delta and Rosedale.

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned agree as follows:

1. Kern Delta will cause up to 10,000 acre-feet of Kern Delta water to be delivered to the Arvin Intake Canal via AE2 and the Kern Island Canal within the boundary of Kern Delta (Kern Delta Point of Delivery), or any other point of delivery mutually agreeable to the parties within the boundaries of Kern Delta, at no cost to Rosedale. Kern Delta will schedule said deliveries with Arvin during the months of April through September. Kern Delta will pay all of its delivery costs to deliver water to Arvin’s Intake Canal (Arvin Point of Delivery). No fees will be charged to Kern Delta or Rosedale by Arvin. Kern Delta will file the Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) TRF and pay the associated TRF fees.

2. Rosedale will cause up to 10,000 acre-feet of Rosedale water to be delivered to the California Aqueduct via the Cross Valley Canal (Rosedale Point of Delivery), or any other point of delivery mutually agreeable to the parties, at no cost to Kern Delta. Rosedale will schedule said deliveries with Kern Delta and KCWA during the months of April through December. Rosedale will pay all of its pumping and delivery costs to deliver water to Kern Delta in the California Aqueduct. All terms of the Arvin/Rosedale Agreement shall remain the same as if Arvin was directly receiving water from Rosedale via the Cross Valley Canal.

3. The operational exchange does not need to be instantaneous. By December 30, 2021, operational exchange totals will be equal at the parties’ respective Points of Delivery.

4. Kern Delta will cause up to 10,000 acre-feet of MWD’s previously stored water to be delivered to growers within Kern Delta. Kern Delta will pay all of its pumping costs to deliver water to its growers.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 94DC6319-5E9C-4FCA-907B-ECACB7892017

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement on the day and year first hereinabove set forth.

ROSEDALE RIO-BRAVE WATER ARVIN-EDISON WATER STORAGE DISTRICT STORAGE DISTRICT

By: ______By:______General Manager Engineer-Manager

KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT

By: ______General Manager

TO: Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Board of Directors Agenda Item 6.a.i

FROM: Dan W. Bartel

DATE: March 9, 2021

RE: Onyx Ranch Operations Report

Discussion: Staff has been working to implement an interim operations plan considering the District’s developing goals and objectives on the Ranch. Specifically, staff has: • Continued operation of conveyance system. • Staff worked on removing old parasite infested landscape around headquarters. • Staff completed annual ditch cleaning. Permits and Access letters with DFW have all been received and report prepared. • Staff assisted with mowing operations at the District. • The CEQA team distributed the FEIR including responses to comments on 12/30/2020 and the Board Certified the document on 1/12/2020. Staff has began the effort to coordinate operations with the Kern River Interests.

Onyx Ranch diverted 0 AF in February. Monthly demands were down from previous years due to field transitions, ditch cleaning efforts, and low flow conditions, wells were not operated to supplement the available surface water supplies. South Fork flows downstream of Bloomfield averaged 29 cfs for the month with a peak of 34 cfs, below the long-term median of about 60 cfs.

South Fork Kern River Monthly Measurement Report

Daily values in SFD = Second Foot Days, Monthly total in AF = Acre-Feet Feb-21 Date South Fork D.Prince (4,5,17,20-22,37) Hafenfeld (5) RRBWSD (1,3,6,7,12, Wirth1, 30,33, Boone) J.Nicoll (3) Audubon Smith Total Diverted South Fork (4,5,9,Wirth1,17,18) (Smith) (20-22,Wirth2,27,29,37) USGS - Onyx Mill/Hillside Miller Prince Miller Landers Cottonwood Scodie/Mack Landers Nicoll Nicoll Cottonwood Nicoll Smith Sierra Way "Flow" 1 28 7.0 7 Yes 2 30 7.0 7 Yes 3 30 0.3 6.2 7.0 13 Yes 4 28 0.3 5.4 7.0 13 Yes 5 26 0.3 6.4 7.0 14 Yes 6 27 0.3 6.5 7.0 14 Yes 7 28 0.3 6.5 7.0 14 Yes 8 28 0.3 6.0 8.7 15 Yes 9 28 10.0 7.6 8.7 26 Yes 10 32 10.0 8.4 8.7 27 Yes 11 30 10.0 7.3 8.7 26 Yes 12 31 10.0 10.0 8.7 29 Yes 13 34 12.0 8.6 8.7 29 Yes 14 30 12.0 8.5 8.7 29 Yes 15 28 11.0 6.4 9.0 26 Yes 16 30 7.0 9.2 9.0 25 Yes 17 29 5.0 8.3 9.0 22 Yes 18 28 7.0 5.4 9.0 21 Yes 19 27 5.0 9.6 9.0 24 Yes 20 28 5.0 11.5 9.0 26 Yes 21 28 5.0 10.0 9.0 24 Yes 22 27 5.0 10.4 7.6 23 Yes 23 27 0.5 12.0 7.6 20 Yes 24 28 2.0 7.5 10.1 7.6 27 Yes 25 28 3.0 6.0 3.0 7.5 6.7 3.5 7.6 37 Yes 26 28 3.9 6.0 3.9 7.1 7.2 3.0 7.6 39 Yes 27 28 3.7 4.0 3.7 7.5 7.7 3.4 7.6 38 Yes 28 29 4.6 4.0 4.6 7.3 7.6 3.3 7.6 39 Yes

SFD 806 0 15 138 15 0 0 0 0 0 37 209 13 227 655 0 AF 1,599 0 30 274 30 0 0 0 0 0 73 415 26 450 1,298 0 29 304 30 0 73 441 476 23 Note: ROSEDALE‐RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT ‐ ONYX RANCH MONTHLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING RUN FEB

2021 Well Name DATE Depth to Water (ft) Notes Onyx Store ‐ Domestic 2/26/2021 42.3 Ranch HQ ‐ Domestic 2/26/2021 16.4 Landers Sand ‐ Old Ag Well 2/26/2021 19.4 Onyx Store ‐ Old Ag Well 2/26/2021 20.8

Mack Well 2/27/2021 21.6 Nicoll Field ‐ Old Ag Well 2/26/2021 14.8 Mack Field West ‐ Domestic 2/26/2021 12.5 Gibboney‐2 Piezo 2/27/2021 6 Gibboney‐3 Piezo 2/26/2021 6 Boone Piezo 2/26/2021 8.4 Lieb Piezo 2/26/2021 8.4 Pruitt Piezo 2/26/2021 15 Scodie Well 2/26/2021 24.8 Pruitt Well 2/26/2021 16.4 Nicoll Well 2/26/2021 15.7 Mack Piezo 2/26/2021 18.4

1 of 1

D.R.P. STATUS REPORT

TO: Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency (SCVW, prev. CLWA), Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)

FROM: Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District (RRBWSD or District)

DATE: March 9th, 2021

SUBJECT: Drought Relief Project - Status Report (January 2021)

PROGRESS This Project Status Report covers activities for the subject project for the month of January. Below is a summary of work that was completed for each project task.

Task 1 – Project Administration: ▪ Total project expenditures through January 31st , 2021 amount to $33,597,848.16. Please refer to the attached table for a summary of expenditures through the period ending January 31st, 2021 relative to the project budgets. Task 2 – Environmental: ▪ CEQA. (Complete) ▪ Environmental Mitigation. (Complete) Task 3 – Rights-of-Way/Easements ▪ Landowner negotiations. (Complete) ▪ PG&E’s Consent to Common Use Agreement. (Complete) ▪ PG&E Service Agreements Stockdale East. (Complete) Task 4 – Permits ▪ KWBA-Pioneer Canal Crossing License Agreement. (Complete) ▪ Kern County Encroachment Permit – Stockdale Crossing. (Complete) ▪ Kern County Encroachment Permit – Brimhall Crossing. (Complete) ▪ Railroad Encroachment Permit. (Complete) ▪ Superior Road Crossing Permit. (Complete) ▪ Matuk Well Permit. (Complete) ▪ Kern County Water Agency Encroachment Permit. (Complete) ▪ Stockdale East 1 & 2 Well Permit (Complete)

Task 5 – Design and Engineering

Phase 1 – Drilling and Equipping of Wells ▪ Superior Well Equipping (Complete) ▪ Stockdale East Wells (Complete) Phase 2 – Conveyance Facilities ▪ CVC Turnout Plans (Complete) ▪ Central Intake Pipeline Design (Complete) ▪ Stockdale East Pipeline (Complete) Phase 3 – Recharge Facilities-Stockdale East Ponds and P.P. Phase 2 ▪ Grant administration ▪ Pumping Plant Design Phase 2 o Pump and Motor Procurement (Complete) o Pump and Motor Installation (Complete) Task 6 – Bid Phase ▪ Notice to Proceed was issued to Bakersfield Well and Pump Company for the Stockdale East Well Drilling and Equipping Project. ▪ Agreement signed by both parties. Task 7 – Construction

Phase 1 – Drilling and Equipping of Wells: ▪ Construction activities included the following: o Western Wellfield Drilling and Equipping (Complete). o Superior Wellfield Drilling 1,2,4,5,6, and Matuk (Complete). o Superior Well Field Equipping (Complete). o Stockdale East Well Drilling and Equipping ▪ Notice to Proceed was issued to Bakersfield Well and Pump.

Phase 2 – Conveyance Facilities: ▪ Construction activities included the following: o Western Wellfield Pipeline (Complete) o Superior Wellfield Pipeline (Complete) o Central Intake Pipeline (Complete) o Pumping Plant Phase 1 (Complete) o CVC Turnout (Complete)

Phase 3 – Recharge Facilities-Stockdale East Ponds and P.P. Phase 2 ▪ Construction activities included the following: o Stockdale East Ponds (Complete) o Pump and Motor Procurement ▪ Training course to be conducted by pump and motor supplier. o Pump and Motor Installation ▪ SCI and their subcontractors installed flowmeter velocity sensors, installed pressure instruments, continued startup and testing at the Pump Station. ▪ At the Stockdale East Pipeline, the 12” turnout to pond 2, 21” butterfly valve, air release valves, and bollards were installed. The pipeline was also pressure tested.

▪ Cascade Pump and BWP have worked together to solve harmonic vibration issue running at a high frequency (Pumps 1 & 5). (complete)

o Stockdale East Drilling and Equipping ▪ Change order on existing Ag. well has been processed. ▪ Notice of completion has been signed and sent out (02/24) ▪ SE-01 and SE-02 have been operated since 12/5/20. ▪ SE-01 flowrate = 2470 GPM = 5.5 CFS ▪ SE-02 flowrate = 2960 GPM = 6.6 CFS

Task 8 – Construction Management and Administration

Phase 1 – Drilling and Equipping of Wells: ▪ Construction management activities included the following: o Superior Wellfield Equipping (Complete)

Phase 2 – Conveyance Facilities: o Pumping Plant Phase 1 (Complete) o CVC Turnout (Complete)

Phase 3 – Recharge Facilities-Stockdale East Ponds and P.P. Phase 2 o Pumping Plant Phase 2 ▪ District has ordered a new flowmeter to combat Mace meter down comings, Seametrics Adjustable Depth Insertion Magmeter (seen below) said to be more reliable and customer support close (Porterville, CA) ▪ Update: Flowmeter has been installed and is working within 2% accuracy to the pump curve. (see below) ▪ District plans to order four (4) more for remaining pump discharges, and two (2) for Central Intake and Stockdale East Ponds.

Task LC – Labor Compliance (Complete)

Figure 1 Previous meter installed Figure 2 New meters to be installed throughout Pumping Plant Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District 2014 Drought Relief Project Summary of Project Costs

Expenses from Expenses YTD Expenses FY Original Revised Expenses thru Remaining Budget Remaining Budget Task No./Description January 1, 2021 Expenses To-Date2 (Jan. 2021 - (Oct. 2020- Budget Budget December 31, 2020 (Original Budget) (Revised Budget) thru January 31, 2021 Dec. 2021) Sept. 2021)

Task 1 - Project Administration $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $359,556.72 $2,003.04 $361,559.76 -$111,559.76 -$111,559.76 $2,003.04 $12,219.59 Task 2 - Environmental $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $29,665.68 $0.00 $29,665.68 $20,334.32 $20,334.32 $0.00 $0.00 Task 3 - Rights of Way/ Easements3 $325,000.00 $325,000.00 $442,838.31 $0.00 $442,838.31 -$117,838.31 -$117,838.31 $0.00 $0.00 Task 4 - Permits4 $123,000.00 $123,000.00 $62,820.53 $0.00 $62,820.53 $60,179.47 $60,179.47 $0.00 $0.00 Task 5 - Design and Engineering5 $1,094,200.00 $1,094,200.00 $1,538,435.63 $0.00 $1,538,435.63 -$444,235.63 -$444,235.63 $0.00 $332.50 Task 6 - Bid Phase Support $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $183,071.89 $0.00 $183,071.89 -$83,071.89 -$83,071.89 $0.00 $0.00 Task 7 - Construction1 Phase 1: Extraction West Wellfield: 3 Wells 9 $3,487,613.00 $3,487,613.00 $3,659,466.62 $0.00 $3,659,466.62 -$171,853.62 -$171,853.62 $0.00 $0.00 Stockdale East Wellfield: 2 Wells 10 $2,332,917.00 $2,332,917.00 $1,664,540.53 $49,073.91 $1,713,614.44 $619,302.56 $619,302.56 $49,073.91 $648,760.70 Superior Wellfield: 6 Wells 11 $7,302,755.00 $9,120,754.77 $9,608,368.34 $0.00 $9,608,368.34 -$2,305,613.34 -$487,613.57 $0.00 $0.00 CVC Turnout $1,219,935.00 $1,219,935.00 $1,136,819.51 $0.00 $1,136,819.51 $83,115.49 $83,115.49 $0.00 $0.00 Central Intake Pipeline $4,991,374.00 $5,269,322.00 $5,349,430.44 $0.00 $5,349,430.44 -$358,056.44 -$80,108.44 $0.00 $0.00 Pumping Plant- Phase 1 $1,029,444.00 $1,029,444.00 $943,933.34 $0.00 $943,933.34 $85,510.66 $85,510.66 $0.00 $0.00 Phase 2: Recharge Stockdale East Ponds $1,547,006.00 $1,547,006.00 $1,244,172.19 $0.00 $1,244,172.19 $302,833.81 $302,833.81 $0.00 $0.00 Pumping Plant-Phase 2 $2,405,359.00 $2,405,359.00 $4,534,689.26 $0.00 $4,534,689.26 -$2,129,330.26 -$2,129,330.26 $0.00 $7,500.00

Task 8 - Construction Management and Administration6 $1,215,820.00 $1,215,820.00 $2,536,791.68 $0.00 $2,536,791.68 -$1,320,971.68 -$1,320,971.68 $0.00 $13,762.00

Task LC - Labor Compliance12 - $128,410.53 $0.00 $128,410.53 - - $0.00 $0.00 Task PT - Packer Testing Construction - $123,760.00 $0.00 $123,760.00 - - $0.00 $0.00 Grand Total7 $27,474,423.00 $29,570,370.77 $33,546,771.21 $51,076.95 $33,597,848.16 -$5,871,254.63 -$3,775,306.86 $51,076.95 $682,574.79 Notes: 1 Amounts from Engineer's Estimate provided by Zeiders Consulting, Inc., dated August 19, 2014. 2 Project expenditures from start of project thru May 31, 2020. 3 Reflects payment to landowners for acquisition of easements for Central Intake Alignment. Amounts are from preliminary appraisal reports prepared by Alliance Appraisals dated September 2014. 4 Environmental Compliance and Permitting. 5 Estimate based on 4.5% of Construction Costs. 6 Estimate based on 5% of Construction Costs. 7 Reflects max of project options. 8 Not aplicable this month. 9 Reflects costs from PG&E incurred in December invoice. 10 Reflects costs from PG&E inccurred in December invoice. Until such time as the Stockdale Integrated agreement is complete, Stockdale East costs shall be accounted to RRBWSD. 11 Reflects costs from PG&E incurred in December invoice. 6 wells will be constructed. 12 Reflects costs for labor compliance (CLWA). Note, in August 2017 Inv. For LC from DIR request shared amongst all partners. 13Reflects 90-percent cost estimate for equipping, estimate for drilling Matuk Well and actual costs for Superior Well Drilling.

TO: Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Board of Directors Agenda Item 6.b.ii

FROM: Dan Bartel, Markus Nygren

DATE: March 9, 2021

RE: Consideration of Pumping Plant Flow Meter Replacement

Discussion: Staff has been working to solve lingering pumping plant issues. • Pump 1 and 5 vibration issues have been resolved and Cascade is scheduling painters. • Pump 4 flow meter shows “sensor error” • Pump 2 flow meter shows 235 cfs, with the pumps off. • Central Intake flow meter is an important backup to the CVC Turnout flow meter during recharge operation but also in recovery. Has not been working consistently. • PLC programming cannot be complete until the plant has all flowmeters working and operational.

Through trial-and-error staff has concluded that Mace Flow Meters will not reliably operate the pumping plant. Just prior to equipping of the pumping plant In-Situ acquired Mace and since that time the quality of product and customer service greatly declined. District staff investigated and piloted the Seametrics EX210S as an alternative and have had success solving the sensor error issue on Pump #4. The District would like to replace the remaining 6 flowmeters at the pumping plant (four on pump discharges, one on Stockdale East, one on the Central Intake) to preclude the constant troubleshooting of the Mace flow meters.

Recommendation: Authorize staff to complete the retrofit of the remining 6 flow meters at a cost not to exceed $22,000.

TechnoFlo Systems SALES ORDER PO Box 1448 Porterville, CA 93258-1448 Date SO #

2/23/2021 15907 SO Phone 559-783-1207 Fax 559-783-1209 Bill To Ship To

Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD Attn: Markus Nygren 849 Allen Rd 849 Allen Rd Bakersfield, CA 93314 Bakersfield, CA 93314

P.O. Number Terms Rep Est. Ship Date Ship Via F.O.B.

Verbal - Markus022321 Net 30 SV 3/10/2021 UPS Origin

Qty. Item Code Description Price Each Amount 5EX210S 10"-48" Seametrics Adjustable Depth 1,274.40 6,372.00T Stainless Steel Insertion Magmeter w/ 18' output cable (#100852 for extra cable) 12-24 Vdc Powered (Saddle or Threaded Fitting not Included) 5FT440W-126 Seametrics Rate/Total Indicator - Wall Mounted 549.00 2,745.00T 12-24 Vdc Powered Pulse & 4-20 mA Outputs w/ Display Cover

1EX210S 10"-48" Seametrics Adjustable Depth 1,274.40 1,274.40T Stainless Steel Insertion Magmeter w/ 18' output cable (#100852 for extra cable) 12-24 Vdc Powered (Saddle or Threaded Fitting not Included) 115 Reverse Flow Output - EX Meters 150.30 150.30T 172 12" Extension of Shaft (EX or IP) 306.00 306.00T **To install on 63" HDPE pipe ** 2FT440W-126 Seametrics Rate/Total Indicator - Wall Mounted 549.00 1,098.00T 12-24 Vdc Powered Pulse & 4-20 mA Outputs w/ Display Cover

Subtotal $11,945.70

Sales Tax (8.25%) $985.52

Total $12,931.22 James Water Bank Authority – Operations Committee Regular Meeting February 18, 2021, 10:30 AM NOTICE: Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting will be held entirely by web access and teleconference. The public can view or listen to the meeting and offer public comment by logging/calling into the following web address/conference line at the time the meeting is scheduled: Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83389497055?pwd=ejlXWEcrUWg4WFBEWGptM0JJeUN5UT09 Telephone Dial-in: (669) 900-6833 Meeting ID: 833 8949 7055 Password: 641947 Any changes to this information will be posted on the District’s website (www.rrbwsd.com) at or before the meeting is called to order. Please check the District’s website if you are unable to hear the meeting.

AGENDA

This meeting is held in accordance with the Brown Act pursuant to Section 54956 of the California Government Code and the James Water Bank Authority Joint Powers Agreement.

1. Roll Call In the absence of a quorum of the Board the meeting will be adjourned.

2. Public Input This portion of the meeting is set aside to provide the public an opportunity to bring to the attention of the Board matters of which the Board may not be aware and which are not on the current agenda. No action can be taken on any matter raised during this portion of the meeting; however, a Board member may request that the matter be placed on any future agenda for further review and possible action.

3. Approval of Minutes DNR/ISL a. December 21, 2020

4. Financial Matters TA a. Bank Account(s) – Status b. Accounts Payable

5. Reports on Pending Activities a. IRWMP Grant Opportunity TA b. CEQA i. DEIR TA ii. Technical Studies DWB c. Maintenance and Operations DWB d. Consideration of Technical Services Agreement

6. New Business This portion of the meeting is set aside to provide each Board member an opportunity to bring to the attention of other Board members and the public matters which have come to their attention and/or which may be appropriate for future consideration. No action can be taken on any matter raised during this portion of the meeting, however, a Board member may request that the matter be placed on any future agenda for further review and possible action. 7. Closed Session DNR/ISL a. Conference with legal counsel – existing litigation [Cal. Govt. Code § 54956.9(a)] 1. City of Bakersfield v. BVWSD & RRBWSD; Kern Co. Superior Court Case No.: S- 1500-CV-274238-RST b. Conference with legal counsel – potential litigation [Cal. Govt. Code § 54956.9(b) & (c)] - One (1) Matter c. Conference with legal counsel – real property negotiations [Cal. Govt. Code §54956.8]

8. Adjournment

Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chapter for the ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO Management Area Annual Report 2020 Kern Groundwater Authority Groundwater Sustainability Agency Kern County Sub-basin 5-22.14, California

Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms 5

Executive Summary 7

1. Administrative Information 8 1.1 General Information 8 1.2 Agency Information 8

2. Basin Setting 11 2.1 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model - Local Refinements 11 2.2 Groundwater Level Monitoring Network 11 2.3 Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network 14

3. Projects, Management Actions, and Adaptive Management 16 3.1 Project Implementation 16 3.2 Management Action Implementation 24 3.3 Adaptive Management 25 3.4 Summary 25

Appendices Appendix A Groundwater Level Hydrographs

Appendix B RRBWSD Operational Logs

March 5, 2021 Page 2 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update Abbreviations and Acronyms

AF Acre-Feet AFY Acre-Feet per Year APN Assessor Parcel Number B Billion BVWSD Buena Vista Water Storage District cfs cubic ft per second CASGEM California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System COC Constituents of Concern CVC Cross Valley Canal CVP Central Valley Project CWC California Water Code DWR Department of Water Resources EIR Environmental Impact Report ET Evapotranspiration ft feet ft/yr feet per year Grat Groundwater Recharge Assessment Tool GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan I-5 Interstate Highway 5 ID4 Improvement District No. 4 IRWD Irvine Ranch Water District IRWMP Integrated Regional Water Management Plant ITRC Irrigation Training and Research Center JPA Joint Powers Authority JURP Joint Use Recovery Project KCWA Kern County Water Agency KGA Kern Groundwater Authority KRCWA Kern River Coalition Authority KWB Kern Water Bank KWBA Kern Water Bank Authority M Million MCL Maximum Contaminant Level mg/ℓ milligram per liter µg/ℓ Microgram per liter MMRP Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Plan MOU Memorandum of Understanding O&M Operations and Maintenance ppm parts per million RRBDL Rosedale-Rio Bravo District Land Sub-Management Area

March 5, 2021 Page 3 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update RRBMA Rosedale-Rio Bravo Management Area RRBWL Rosedale-Rio Bravo White Land Sub-Management Area RRBWSD Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District SGMA California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act SOD South of Delta SWP State Water Project TDS Total Dissolved Solids USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WRSP Western Rosedale Specific Plan

March 5, 2021 Page 4 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update Executive Summary The Rosedale-Rio Bravo Management Area (RRBMA) generally covers about 48,610 acres west of Bakersfield within the Kern County Sub-basin which has been categorized as severely over drafted and a high priority towards sustainability. This Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP), has a 20-year implementation schedule and a 50-year planning horizon, includes a physical description of the basin, including groundwater levels, groundwater quality, subsidence, information on groundwater-surface water interaction, data on historical and projected water demands and supplies, monitoring and management provisions.

The RRBMA relies heavily on groundwater and has approximately 350 extraction wells of which approximately half are agricultural and the other half banking, municipal, and domestic. In order to support the groundwater extraction, the Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District was formed in 1959 over most of the RRBMA area in order to import surface water supplies to reduce the rapid water level declines that were being experienced at the time. From the late 1970’s to the late 2000’s water levels stabilized, however, as a result of extreme drought conditions and regulatory restrictions on imported water supplies the decline has resumed at a rate of 3-6 ft/yr. At the low point of the 2012-2016 drought the average depth to groundwater in the RRBMA had fallen to historic lows at about 264 ft.

Favorable hydrology from 2017-2019 coupled with aggressive groundwater recharge activities and the implementation of projects and management actions has resulted in groundwater levels rising to 171 ft by the end of 2019. However unfavorable hydrology coupled with groundwater recovery activities have resulted in groundwater levels decreasing by 20 ft, since the start of SGMA implementation. The resultant 2017-2020 water level change has been +72 Ft. As of the end of 2020, the East, and South of the River Monitoring Zones have recovered to nearly the Measurable Objectives. The North, South, and Central Monitoring Zones are near or exceed the established water level Minimum Thresholds. This has not yet triggered an undesirable result as defined in the RRBMA plan.

The RRBMA has a projected a potential long-term water supply deficiency of about 20,116 AFY. The RRBMA seeks to eliminate that shortage over the next 20 years in a regressive fashion (aggressive in first 10 years) by a combination of projects and water management actions. Projects include water supply transfers, construction of direct recharge projects, and demand reduction. Costs of these projects are estimated at $10M per year. Due to aggressive adaptive management actions the RRBMA has exceeded its reduction in water deficit milestone by 1,500 AFY.

March 5, 2021 Page 5 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

March 5, 2021 Page 6 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update 1. Administrative Information 1.1 General Information The purpose of this chapter is to describe the RRBMA compliance with the requirements of the California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) developed in coordination of the Kern Groundwater Authority Groundwater Sustainability Agency (KGAGSA). This GSP has a 20-year implementation schedule and a 50-year planning horizon, includes a physical description of the basin, including groundwater levels, groundwater quality, subsidence, information on groundwater-surface water interaction, data on historical and projected water demands and supplies, monitoring and management provisions.

The Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District (RRBWSD or District) operates primarily as a groundwater replenishment district similar to a traditional groundwater bank. Direct surface water deliveries to beneficial uses are minimal with most in-District deliveries via direct groundwater recharge. RRBWSD landowners recover water for multiple beneficial uses via private and public groundwater extraction wells. RRBWSD, since its inception, has implemented several projects and acquired water supplies sufficient to provide for overlying demands. 1.2 Agency Information RRBWSD is a public agency organized in accordance with California Water Storage District Law (Division 14, commencing with §39000 of the California Water Code) for the purpose of acquiring, storing, distributing, and replenishing water supplies within its boundaries in Kern County, California. There is a board of five elected members that govern the District. It is operated by Engineer-Manager, Dan Bartel who is tasked with implementing the District’s activities, including the District’s activities under this plan; Mr. Bartel is the District’s Plan Manager for purposes of this chapter. Ultimately it is the elected Board of Directors of RRBWSD that is responsible for the RRBMA SGMA implementation. The elected board approves all final documents, updates, CEQA findings, procedures, and policies with respect to SGMA RRBMA activities

Physical Address: 849 Allen Road, Bakersfield CA, 93314 Email: [email protected] Phone: 661 589-6045

The RRBMA has actively sought to solicit public engagement by means of a its local stakeholder groups. While the RRBMA is governed by the RRBWSD, a RRBMA Stakeholder Advisory Group (Stakeholder Group) has been established to provide stakeholders within the RRBMA an opportunity to participate in the development of the GSP and to review and provide comment as the GSP is developed. This Stakeholder Group is made up of representatives from four key interests within the RRBMA: Agricultural, Urban, White Lands, and Groundwater Banking. Meetings are held the 4th Tuesday of each month or as needed and geared towards discussions surrounding the development and implementation of the RRBMA SGMA GSP. The RRBWSD has designated representatives from each group. Meetings are posted and open to all stakeholders within the RRBMA and key documents are posted on the District website. https://www.rrbwsd.com/rrbma

The District maintains a website (www.rrbwsd.com); the District regularly posts materials regarding SGMA and conducts outreach to all stakeholders using the website. The RRBWSD has extensively participated in an exchange of information with other members of the KGA. Informal comments on this

March 5, 2021 Page 7 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update information were received and discussed at Stakeholder workshops. In addition, the RRBWSD Board of Directors has discussed SGMA topics at many of its regular and special meetings during the past few years. At the RRBMA Stakeholder meetings, scores of topics have been covered including but not limited to: decision making process, public engagement, schedule, process, thresholds, undesirable results, projects and management action implementation, CEQA, basin coordination, sustainable yield, water balance, budgets, and consumptive use.

March 5, 2021 Page 8 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update 2. Basin Setting 2.1 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model – Local Refinements As part of the RRBWSD’s efforts to manage groundwater and evaluate impacts of neighboring groundwater banking projects a numerical groundwater flow model was developed in 2011 and has been updated and refined each year since. The tool has been essential in identifying and mitigating groundwater level impacts from banking project recovery as well as evaluating future groundwater levels relative to future projects and management actions. For the RRBMA this tool was used to evaluate the adequacy of projects and management actions to effect compliance with minimum thresholds and measurable objectives. Throughout 2020 Thomas Harder and Associates (model developer) implemented various model improvements (incorporation of METRIC ET data), stressor updates, and recalibration. It is planned that the model will be updated during 2021 to include 2020 data and projected 2021 operations. 2.2 Groundwater Level Monitoring Network The RRBMA has implemented a robust water level monitoring network given that this is an important method to measuring groundwater sustainability in the area. Groundwater levels are monitored monthly in 20 locations (Figure 1), six of these locations are multi completion monitor wells at various depth intervals so that water level information is also available vertically within the aquifer. The wells are a combination of agricultural, domestic and dedicated monitor wells of known well construction. The current wells offer reliable long-term data. Long‐term groundwater hydrograph plots of potentiometric surfaces are shown in Figures 2-6 for each of the zones (North, Central, South, East and South of River). To the extent that two of the North, Central, and South of River zones exceed this criterion, the RRBMA will consider it an undesirable result. To the extent that either the South or East zones exceed this criterion, the RRBMA will consider it an undesirable result. No water level undesirable results are present at this time (see Figure 1)

It is noteworthy that the North and Central Zones show a muted impact from recharge and recovery operations on the banking projects to the south and indicate a steady decline but have leveled out in the 2017-2021 period. Levels in the North Zone are below the GSP established Minimum Thresholds and levels in the Central Zone are above therefore this is not considered an undesirable result according to the RRBMA plan criteria.

The South and East Zones however depict large fluctuations consistent with large recharge and recovery cycles on the Kern River Fan. Levels were at the GSP established Minimum Thresholds in 2016-17 but in the East zone appear to now be rising and approaching the Measurable Objectives. The South Zone, under more duress from recovery operations has fluctuated between measurable objectives and minimum threshold.

The South of River Zone also depicts large fluctuations consistent with large recharge and recovery cycles on the Kern River Fan. Levels were at the GSP established Minimum Thresholds in 2016-17 but since SGMA implementation have begun to rise and are approaching the Measurable Objectives.

March 5, 2021 Page 9 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

Figure 1. Monitoring Zones with MT’s and Dec 2020 Average Measurements

March 5, 2021 Page 10 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

March 5, 2021 Page 11 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

March 5, 2021 Page 12 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

Figure 2-6. Monitoring Zone Hydrographs

2.3 Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network The RRBMA has implemented a robust water quality monitoring network. Groundwater quality is monitored annually in 35 locations, six of these locations are multi completion monitor wells at various depth intervals so that water level information is also available vertically within the aquifer. The wells are a combination of agricultural, domestic and dedicated monitor wells of known well construction. The current wells offer reliable long-term data. Data collection has commenced but results have not yet been analyzed; a detailed discussion of water quality conditions will be included in the 2021port. The following constituents of concern will be sampled and tested for:

COCs Beneficial Uses by Monitoring Zone

Arsenic Drinking Water/Banking Chromium (Total Chromium) Drinking Water/Banking Hexavalent Chromium Drinking Water/Banking Nickel Drinking Water/Banking pH Ag/Drinking Water/Banking TDS Ag/Drinking Water/Banking Specific Conductance Ag/Drinking Water/Banking Chloride Ag/Drinking Water/Banking

March 5, 2021 Page 13 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update Sulfate Drinking Water/Banking Uranium Drinking Water/Banking Low Level Bromide Drinking Water/Banking Low Level 1,2,3-TCP Drinking Water/Banking Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) Drinking Water/Banking Nitrate as NO3 Drinking Water/Banking

March 5, 2021 Page 14 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update 3.0 Projects, Management Actions, and Adaptive Management 3.1 Project Implementation RRBWSD is developing several projects in order to meet its measurable objectives and achieve sustainability. All the considered projects and management actions help the RRBMA achieve its measurable objectives for chronic lowering of groundwater levels, reduction in groundwater storage, degraded water quality, and land subsidence. Project and management action implementation will be subject to CEQA requirements for implementation and the associated public noticing, regulatory, and permitting requirements. It is expected that RRBWSD will serve as the lead agency for these actions. RRBWSD is a public agency organized in accordance with California Water Storage District Law (Division 14, commencing with §39000 of the California Water Code) for the purpose of acquiring, storing, distributing, and replenishing water supplies within its boundaries in Kern County, California.

For each project conservative assumptions as to average annual yield are provided recognizing that there will be more competition for supplies moving forward than in the past. For direct recharge projects average annual yield is based on expected recharge rates multiplied by the anticipated surface area multiplied by 150 days of usage, two years out of ten. This equals about 8% opportunity time; RRBWSD’s past recharge operations have been about 40%. Direct recharge projects also typically provide demand reduction benefits that are also considered in project supplies. A pre-project demand of 2.3 AF/Acre is assumed. See project evaluation matrix in Appendix K.

3.1.1 Recharge Basin Improvement Projects (Enns) The Enns Basins Improvement Project was added to this component in 2019 as an adaptive management action to add an additional 195-acre project west of Bakersfield. The Enns Basins are designed to recharge, store and recover water to provide a cost-effective and reliable water supply for landowners within the RRBWSD as shown in Figure 10. RRBWSD purchased a portion of the properties in 2019 and proceeded with environmental analysis and grant funding applications in 2020. An addendum to a previous conjunctive-use EIR was adopted November 2020 and a WaterSmart USBR award agreement was executed in September 2020 providing $750,000 of federal drought resiliency funding towards development and construction costs. in This project will be designed with the potential to recharge up to 30,500 AF of water in wet years. This could provide the RRBWSD with up to 2,500 AFY. Project construction is slated for 2021 at a total capital cost of approximately $9.5M; annual O&M costs are estimated to be $30,000 Total annualized cost is $515,000, or $147/AF (plus water cost).

Figure 10. Enns Basin Improvements

March 5, 2021 Page 15 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

3.1.4 Onyx Ranch The RRBWSD owns several parcels of land and the associated water rights for the Onyx Ranch and the Smith Ranch. These parcels are located along the South Fork of the Kern River in the Kern River Valley, in and around the communities of Weldon and Onyx, in an unincorporated area of northeastern Kern County. These parcels together comprise the 4,109.18-acre project site. The RRBWSD is currently conducting an analysis of a proposed change in the point of diversion and place of use of the water rights associated with these parcels so that the water can be delivered in the RRBWSD service area on the San Joaquin Valley floor and used for irrigation and groundwater recharge. The net increase in water supplies to the RRBWSD’s service area as a result of the proposed project would help mitigate the shortages in RRBWSD’s contracted State Water Project (SWP) water supply from the State of California, which has steadily reduced due to environmental constraints in the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta. The proposed project could provide the RRBWSD with approximately 6,500 AFY. The project is currently undergoing an environmental analysis; a Draft EIR was completed and circulated May 2020. Responses to comments were circulated December 2020 and the FEIR was certified January 2021. The project could be on-line as early as 2021. Estimated total capital cost is $30M; annual O&M costs are estimated to be $450,000. Annualized cost is $2.3M, or $356/AF. See Figure 16.

Figure 16. Onyx Ranch Project Site

3.1.5 James Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project The James Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project is a proposed 2,070-acre project in southwest Bakersfield designed to recharge, store and recover water to provide a cost-effective and reliable water supply for landowners within the RRBWSD (and elsewhere). Rosedale and Buena Vista Water Storage District jointly purchase the property in 2011. This project has the potential to recharge up to 150,000 AF of water in wet years. This could provide the RRBWSD with up to 3,000 AFY. A conceptual design

March 5, 2021 Page 16 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update and feasibility analysis was completed in 2019 as well as a tentative award of grant funds. Environmental analysis was re-initiated with the distribution of a Notice of Preparation of and EIR in June 2020 and completion of the EIR anticipated in 2021. This project could be online as early as 2025. Estimated total capital cost is $6.8M; annual O&M costs are estimated to be $200,000. Annualized cost is $700,000, or $235/AF (plus water costs). See Figure 17.

Figure 17. James Project

3.1.6 Kern Fan Groundwater Storage Project. The District has evaluated a conceptual Kern Fan Groundwater Storage Project (Kern Fan Project). This project would serve to develop a regional water bank in the Kern Fan to capture and store Article 21 water via the State Water Project (SWP) during conditions when surface water is abundant. On July 24, 2018 the California Water Commission approved $2.7B of Proposition 1 funding to eight water storage projects, including $67.5M towards the Districts sponsored Kern Fan Groundwater Storage Project. This could provide the RRBWSD with up to 10,000 AFY. Project status is as follows: feasibility analysis was completed in March 2020; DEIR was circulated October 2020 and FEIR certified December 2020. During 2021 property acquisition, permitting and design efforts will commence. This project could be on-line as early as 2028. Estimated total capital cost is $45M; annual O&M costs are estimated to be $1.35M. Annualized cost is $4.7M or $468/AF (plus water costs). See Figure 18.

March 5, 2021 Page 17 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

Figure 18. Kern Fan Project

3.1.7 Western Rosedale In-Lieu Service Area The Western Rosedale Lands In-Lieu Service Area Project (the Project) includes construction and operation of up to ten miles of water conveyance pipelines, including appurtenant facilities (such as pumps and valves), and a joint service area agreement between RRBWSD and BVWSD in order to provide surface water to agricultural water users within the portion of RRBWSDs service area located westerly of Interstate 5 in close proximity to Buena Vista Water Storage Districts East Side Canal. This could provide the RRBWSD with up to 1,000 AFY. Project status is shovel ready; feasibility and environmental analysis is complete. This project could be on-line as early as 2035. Estimated total capital cost is $5.1M; annual O&M costs are estimated to be $152,000. Annualized cost is $526,000, or $467/AF (plus water costs). See Figure 19.

March 5, 2021 Page 18 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update Figure 19. Western Rosedale In-Lieu Service Area

3.1.8 Ten Section Water Recharge Project The owners of Ten Section located within the South of the River Monitoring Zone are currently studying the feasibility of a 200+ acre groundwater recharge, storage and recovery project as shown on Figure 20. It is estimated that approximately 2,200 AF/month could be recharged into the aquifer. No implementation date is known at this time.

Figure 20. Ten Section Groundwater Recharge Project

March 5, 2021 Page 19 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update 3.2 Management Action Implementation 3.2.1 Water Charge Demand Reduction The District may consider implementing a water charge that would be imposed on the use of water by a landowner over a certain level. A water charge would be expected to result in demand reduction in the RRBWSD. For market reasons it is probable that landowners will opt to fallow ground in order to trade water supplies to other District landowners, as well as fallow lands (or limit double cropping) to avoid the Water Charge all together. With an agricultural water consumptive-use demand of about 84,000 AFY, the District conservatively expects a 5% demand reduction as a result of the water charge which results in about 4,000 AFY of reduced demand. This management action also provides funding for projects previously described. Environmental analysis is scheduled for 2021 and a water charge could be implemented prior to 2025. A web-based water budget platform was completed in December 2020 to allow users to begin tracking usage and water budget balances for background information for the 2025 implementation. 3.2.2 RRBWL (White Land) Water Supplies and Demand Imbalance Reduction White Lands (non-RRBWSD lands) within the RRBMA that are not used for groundwater banking will correct the water supply imbalance on a linear basis over the planning period of 2020-2040. The total annual demand for white lands in the RRBMA is about 10,822 AFY with a water supply imbalance (or deficit) of 5,198 AFY. The average agricultural demand is 2.6 AF/acre according to METRIC studies. While agricultural demands in the White Lands range from 1.4-4.9 AF/acre the initial allowable demand will be the average demand of 2.6 AF/acre. It is expected that white lands would seek to acquire water supplies for in-lieu and direct groundwater recharge via banking agreements with RRBWSD or others to offset demands. Demand reduction will occur as follows over the 2020-2040 period; the imbalance will be reduced by 1/20 of the current imbalance each year (5%) as shown on Table 1 on a 5-year basin. To the extent the imbalance is not met during the current year it will be deducted from the subsequent. To the extent that white land landowners import water supplies their respective farming unit net demands are offset.

Native Yield + Precipitation + Imported Supply = Sustainable Yield - Demand = Imbalance

1,022 AFY + 2,436 AFY + 2,165 AFY = 5,623 AFY - 10,822 AF = 5,199 AF

0.15 AF/acre + .42 AF/acre + 0 AF/acre = 0.57 AF/acre - 2.6 AF/acre = 2.03 AF/acre

Allowable Imbalance Allowable Demand

Allowed 2020 Imbalance = 2.03 x 20/20 = 2.03 AF/acre 2.6 AF/acre

Allowed 2021 Imbalance = 2.03 x 19/20 = 1.92 AF/acre 2.5 AF/acre

Allowed 2022 Imbalance = 2.03 x 18/20 = 1.82 AF/acre 2.4 AF/acre

Allowed 2023 Imbalance = 2.03 x 17/20 = 1.72 AF/acre 2.3 AF/acre

Allowed 2024 Imbalance = 2.03 x 16/20 = 1.62 AF/acre 2.2 AF/acre

Allowed 2020-2024 Imbalance = 9.11 AF/acre 12.0 AF/acre Allowed 2040 Imbalance = 2.3 x 0/20 = 0.0 AF/acre 0.57 AF/acre Table 1. Projected RRBWL Demand Reduction Milestones

March 5, 2021 Page 20 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update This approach will result in about 260 AF of imbalance reduction each year and 2,600 AFY by 2030 and a total of 5,199 AFY by the 2040 sustainability planning period. Environmental analysis is scheduled for 2021 and will be implemented on a voluntary basis in 2020. A web-based water budget platform was completed in December 2020 to allow users to begin tracking usage and water budget balances for 2020-2024 reduction requirements. 3.2.3 RRBWD 3rd Party Recharge and Storage Program The RRBWSD will assist 3rd parties (white lands, districts, and private parties) in recharging water supplies for use in the RRBMA or other down gradient areas in the Kern Sub-basin. RRBWSD would offer existing conveyance and recharge facilities in exchange for a portion of the imported water supply and payments of yet-to-be developed costs and/or fees. It is expected that the RRBWSD would provide this service in exchange for 20-33% of the imported water supply and that an average amount of 5000 AFY would be imported. This management action could bring an additional supply of 1,250 AFY to RRBDL lands. Environmental analysis is scheduled for 2020-2021 and could be on-line as early as 2021. 3.3 Adaptive Management To the extent that projects and management actions are unable to prevent undesirable effects that are caused by RRBMA activities, further actions will be evaluated and considered. For example, if either the projects or management actions are unable to produce the projected supplies, or other more cost- effective options are found the RRBMA may deviate from the actions as described above. For example, the District adaptively added the Superior and Enns Basins Improvement projects as part of this adaptive management strategy. The goal of the RRBMA is to enact projects and actions to accomplish at least a linear path to sustainability. RRBWLs Water Supplies and Demand Imbalance Reduction. Because the White Lands are located outside of the political boundaries of the RRBWSD, assessment and water charges are not likely to be imposed unless voluntarily created by those landowners. Currently, there is a contractual relationship with the RRBWSD and the specific landowners that provides the landowners with a method to comply with SGMA. Compliance with demand reduction management action(s) will initially be voluntary in nature. However, to the extent that a landowner refuses to comply, the RRBWSD may terminate the contractual relationship that provides the landowner with SGMA compliance and remove the landowner from the RRBMA. The RRBMA will be performing annual demand estimates and will evaluate RRBWL compliance each year. The RRBWSD may provide the RRBWLs with opportunities to participate in water supply programs in the future; there will likely be opportunities for those lands and landowners to generate additional water supplies through these efforts. During January 2020 RRBWSD offered groundwater for transfer from a potential land fallow program. No RRBWL participants opted to participate.

3.4 Summary 2020 Projects. The RRBMA had planned to develop projects capable of 5,000 AFY by 2020, but due to its adaptive management actions it has developed approximately 6,500 AFY of additional supply by 2020; those adaptive management actions included the West Basins and Superior Basins Improvements and Stockdale East projects. Total capital cost are approximately $15.9M and annual O&M costs are approximately $416,000. Total annualized cost is $1,509,000 or $232/AF (plus water cost).

March 5, 2021 Page 21 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update 2020 Management Actions. It is estimated that the RRBWL demand reductions described above will result in approximately 217 AFY of demand reduction starting in 2020. This approach would result in an imbalance reduction of 2,167 AFY by 2030 and a total of 4,335 AFY by the 2040 sustainability planning period.

It is estimated that the RRBMA 3rd party recharge and storage program will result in approximately 1,250 AFY of new supplies for the RRBMA starting in 2020. See Table 2. for 5-year milestones.

Projects Management Actions Total

Actual Milestone Actual Milestone Actual Milestone

2020 6,500 AFY 5,000 AFY 1,250 AFY 1,250 AFY 7,750 AFY 6,250 AFY

2021 6,500 AFY 5,000 AFY 1,467 AFY 1,467 AFY 7,967 AFY 6,467 AFY 2025 11,500 AFY 5,300 AFY 16,800 AFY

2030 10,000 AFY 1,300 AFY 11,300 AFY

2035 1000 AFY 1,300 AFY 2,300 AFY

2040 0 AFY 1,300 AFY 1,300 AFY

Table 2. Projected Project and Management Action Milestones

March 5, 2021 Page 22 RRBMA 2020 Annual Update

TO: Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Board of Directors Agenda Item 6b.ii.

FROM: Markus Nygren

DATE: March 9, 2021

RE: Budget Augmentation and Support Budget

Discussion: 1. In October 2020, the Board gave staff direction to proceed with improvements and modifications to the water accounting platform. After further discussion in the following months, staff request that an additional $13,000 be approved to facilitate bulk account creation and user onboarding. This was a very important item to grow the Accounting Platform as this created the budget for verification key registration. 2. District Staff recommends approving a budget for two (2) hours per month of on-call support as needed at $135/hr. = $3,240 for the year.

Recommendation: Approve budget augmentation to increase user onboarding budget and for limited on call support through 2021 for a total of $16,240.

Sitka Technology Group, LLC 525 3rd Street #229 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 503-808-1220

MANAGED SERVICES ORDER FORM

Prepared By: John Burns Quote Expiration Date: 3/15/2021

Customer Information

Billing Contact Administrative Contact (if different)

Name: Eric Averett Name:

Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Agency: Agency: Storage District

Address: PO Box 20820 Address: City: Bakersfield City: State: CA State: Zip: 93390-0820 Zip: Telephone: 661-589-6045 Telephone: Email: [email protected] Email:

Terms and Conditions

Start Date: 3/1/2021 Billing Frequency: Annual Initial Term: 12 months Payment Terms: NET30

Services provided under this Managed Services Order Form (“Order”) are governed by the terms of the Managed Services Agreement (“Agreement”), which is provided as Attachment 2 to this order form. Any additional terms described in this Order shall apply to products or services ordered in this Order only, unless otherwise specified, and shall supersede any conflicting terms in the Agreement. If there are no terms inserted in the Additional Terms section below, the Agreement is unchanged for this Order. Upon signature and submission of this Order by the Customer, this Order shall become legally binding. By signing this Order, you warrant that you are authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of your Company.

Additional Terms:

Agreement is for 12 months of application management for the Water Accounting Platform. See details in Application Management and Hosting Service Description (Attachment 1 included with this order form).

Also includes 10 hours / month of on-call support including implementing small features requests, bug fixes, training, backlog management.

Confidential Information | Page 1 of 16

Services and Fee Schedule

Application Name Unit Unit Price Quantity Total Water Accounting Platform, 1-year Application Management and Year $12,000.00 1.00 $12,000.00 Hosting

On-call support, as needed up to 10 hours / month @ $135 / hour Hours $135.00 120.00 $16,200.00

Total (USD): $28,200.00

Signatures

Customer Sitka Technology Group

Name: Eric Averett Name: Keith Steele

Title: General Manager Title: Managing Partner

Date: Date:

Signature: Signature:

Confidential Information | Page 2 of 16

TO: Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Board of Directors Agenda Item 6bii

FROM: Markus Nygren

DATE: March 9, 2021

RE: Evapotranspiration Comparison

Discussion District staff thought it beneficial to compare different methods of ET. Due to constraints with LandIQ, only limited sections were available for comparison. The three methods evaluated are OpenET, LandIQ, and Metric ITRC. The first two comparisons are sections in the northwest part of the District, consisting of a variety of row crops (i.e., Potatoes, wheat alfalfa, carrots, etc.). The second comparison looks at an individual alfalfa field, but as you can see only two ET methods were available for comparison (LandIQ and OpenET). Methods deviate from the average by about 1-6%, from each other by 2-12%. There was no trend as to which method runs higher or lower based on the sample size.

2019 Open ET vs LandIQ vs Metric ITRC APN 103-160-04 OPEN ET LAND IQ Metric ITRC MONTH (ET Acre-Ft) (ET Acre-Ft) (ET Acre-Ft) JAN 52.3 51.4 25.2 FEB 59.8 62.4 49.1 MAR 85.4 104.0 85.3 APR 147.0 170.4 206.9 MAY 198.5 216.9 224.7 JUN 255.7 286.6 258.6 JUL 287.2 302.5 330.2 AUG 162.5 131.6 163.0 SEP 130.6 102.3 145.8 OCT 90.1 74.7 84.2 NOV 58.4 42.0 58.1 DEC 50.2 43.5 24.0 Total 1577.7 1588.2 1654.8 Deviation from avg. 1.9% 1.2% 2.9% *Crop type is a roation of potatoes, wheat, fallowed land, and carrots 2019 Open ET vs LandIQ vs Metric 29S 24E 23 OPEN ET LAND IQ Metric ITRC MONTH (ET Acre-Ft) (ET Acre-Ft) (ET Acre-Ft) JAN 52.7 54.4 27.6 FEB 63.3 71.1 46.6 MAR 92.8 119.7 94.6 APR 108.5 158.6 137.1 MAY 112.2 149.2 90.0 JUN 193.5 246.5 184.9 JUL 231.5 235.8 227.2 AUG 201.8 194.6 214.6 SEP 147.0 142.5 150.8 OCT 84.1 71.5 76.2 NOV 42.4 24.8 28.9 DEC 41.2 18.6 22.9 Total 1371.0 1487.1 1301.4 Deviation from avg. 1.1% 6.8% 6.5%

2019 ALFALFA OPEN ET VS LAND IQ COMPARISON APN 103-160-13 OPEN ET LAND IQ MONTH (ET Acre-Ft) (ET Acre-Ft)

JAN 7.9 7.1

FEB 10.1 12.0 MAR 16.7 22.1 APR 20.5 36.4 MAY 22.9 26.6 JUN 35.9 41.7 JUL 37.5 39.1 AUG 35.4 36.8 SEP 29.5 29.5

OCT 18.2 16.1

NOV 4.8 1.8 DEC 5.2 3.5 Total 244.6 272.6 Deviation from avg. 5.7% 5.1%

KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY CROSS VALLEY CANAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE

MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA Stuart T. Pyle Water Resources Center 3200 Rio Mirada Drive Bakersfield, California

February 24, 2021

Conference Line: 1 (872) 240-3412 Access Code: 594-821-381# https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/594821381

Agenda

1. Call to order – 1:30 p.m.

2. Cross Valley Canal Advisory Committee Members Report

3. Public Comment

4. Approval of Cross Valley Canal Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes

Regular Meeting – December 14, 2020

5. Report of the Water Resources Manager a. Update on Cross Valley Canal Construction/Maintenance Projects

6. Report on Cross Valley Canal Operations and Deliveries a. Operations and Maintenance Activity b. Year-to-Date Deliveries

7. Update on Aggregated Hydraulic Analysis

8. Recommendation to Execute a Task Order Under the Kern County Water Agency Agreement for Professional Consulting Services with GEI Consultants, Inc.

9. Adjourn

NOTICE: This meeting is being conducted primarily by telephone conference. Conference Line:1 (872) 240-3412/ Access Code: 594-821-381#/ https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/594821381

Requests for a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to attend or participate in a meeting should be made to the CVC Secretary in advance of the meeting to ensure availability of the requested service or accommodation. Attachment 5

Cross Valley Canal Pump and Flow Configuration Last Updated on February 15, 2021

'A' Pumping Plants 'B' Pumping Plants Total Total Total A B C D E F G H J cfs K L M N cfs cfs Estimated Pumping Plant No. 1 Horsepower 100 250 565 565 565 565 250 100 800 800 800 Estimated Flow Rate (cfs) 31 70 180 180 180 180 70 31 922 167 167 167 500 1,422 Estimated Pumping Plant No. 2 Horsepower 100 250 565 565 400 565 250 100 700 700 700 Estimated Flow Rate (cfs) 31 70 180 180 140 180 70 31 882 167 167 167 500 1,382 Estimated Pumping Plant No. 3 Horsepower 100 250 565 565 565 250 100 250 100 700 700 700 Estimated Flow Rate (cfs) 31 70 180 180 180 70 31 70 31 843 167 167 167 500 1,343 Estimated Pumping Plant No. 4 Horsepower 100 250 565 565 565 250 100 250 100 700 700 700 Estimated Flow Rate (cfs) 31 70 180 180 180 70 31 70 31 843 167 167 167 500 1,343 Estimated Pumping Plant No. 5 Horsepower 100 250 565 565 565 250 100 250 100 700 700 700 Estimated Flow Rate (cfs) 31 70 180 180 180 70 31 70 31 843 167 167 334 1,177 Estimated Pumping Plant No. 6 Horsepower 100 250 565 565 565 250 250 100 200 600 600 350 Estimated Flow Rate (cfs) 31 70 180 180 180 70 70 31 812 40 193 193 90 495 1,307 Estimated Pumping Plant No. 7 Horsepower 100 250 250 250 250 100 Estimated Flow Rate (cfs) 31 70 70 70 70 311 311 Cross Valley Canal (CVC) Hydraulic Improvements Project Hydraulic Model Aggregation

February 25, 2021 Progress Summary

Kern County Water Agency GEI Consultants Inc. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. David Rogers 1 Model Aggregation Added Pumps Verification Conditions Combined Geometry Boundary Boundary Model Model New New Combined individual models into one into models individual Combined stationing Global Horiz locations structure and alignment Georeferenced field data field and results model individual to model aggregated Comparing Pumping plantwater levels to adjust pump curves (recommended) level water downstream ft 9 Downstream: Rev. Upstream: Water (299.75 Levels Aqueduct CA operating Max/Min Agency Supplied limits testing pump from curves Pump pump of analysis Extensive in ‘A’ pumps Added plants ‘B’ and pumping : NAD83; Vert:: NAD83; NAVD88 2 headloss characteristics – 300.75) Pool 2 Model Verification

Pool 1

o Maximum discrepancy is 6 inches – at GBTO

o Generally within 2 inches o Results identical when controlling for boundary conditions and pump curves

3 Model Simulations

1. High discharge (~1,080 cfs) 2. Moderate discharge (~700 cfs) 3. Low discharge (~300 cfs) 4. Power outage scenario (~1,080 cfs abruptly dropping to no flow) 5. All pumps operating 6. A-Plants only operation (typical operations)

4 Model Results

5 Model Results

6 Model Results

Downstream Pumping Plant 1A – Power Failure

7 Next Steps • Decide: o Freeboard target o Pump submergence

8 Next Steps • Evaluate o Raise liner, evaluate extent of improvements o Additional capacity from lower submergence limits at pumping plants o Alternative pumping configurations o Impact of adjusted CA Aqueduct water levels on canal capacity (modified operating levels to address subsidence) o Reduced dependency on CA Aqueduct operations o Approach channel hydraulics and water fluctuations o VFD (not possible in HEC-RAS software) o Explore other possibilities to reduce flow instabilities

9

MEMORANDUM 20.2.1

TO: Cross Valley Canal Advisory Committee Agenda Item No. 8

FROM: Martin Varga

DATE: February 24, 2021

SUBJECT: Recommendation to Execute a Task Order Under the Kern County Water Agency Agreement for Professional Consulting Services with GEI Consultants, Inc.

Issue: Recommend authorizing execution of a task order under the Kern County Water Agency Agreement for Professional Consulting Services with GEI Consultants, Inc.

Recommended Motion: Recommend execution of a task order under the Kern County Water Agency Agreement for Professional Consulting Services with GEI Consultants, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $95,000, subject to approval of General Counsel as to legal form, as outlined in the February 25, 2021 staff memorandum to the Cross Valley Canal Committee, Agenda Item No. 3.

Discussion: On April 26, 2018, the Kern County Water Agency (Agency) Board of Directors authorized the General Manager to retain GEI Consultants, Inc. (GEI) to provide hydraulic analyses, prepare design memoranda, develop contract bidding documents for canal and pumping plant facilities infrastructure improvements, and provide technical oversight of construction projects for the Cross Valley Canal (CVC) Hydraulic Improvements Project (Project) and the two remaining projects from the CVC Expansion Project mitigation of the motor start voltage flicker issue at Pumping Plant No. 3B and completion of pumping plant forebay vortexing mitigation. Agency staff has identified additional work to be performed by GEI that is not part of the Project, and has received the following task proposal:

Task J – Evaluation of the CVC channel freeboard and pump submergence. $95,000 Evaluate the feasibility and potential risks of reducing the minimum pump submergence for infrequent operations when the CVC is approaching its flow capacity as a method of increasing the freeboard resulting in potentially increased canal capacity.

The proposed task order is for an amount not to exceed $95,000 and will be incorporated as Exhibit J to the agreement between the Agency and GEI. Costs for Task J will be paid by the Integrated Canal Participants. The proposed task order is provided as Attachment 1.

Attachment 1 EXHIBIT J (Scope of Work)

Hydraulic Improvement Project- Scope of Work for Task Order J The scope for the CVC Hydraulic Improvement Project – Evaluation to Review the CVC Channel Freeboard and Pump Submergence is as follows:

Task 1 – Project Management Project management services will include conducting a project kick-off meeting to review project requirements and expectations; monitoring schedule and budget; reviewing and issuing monthly invoices with progress summaries and conducting updates during bi-weekly conference calls with KCWA to provide status updates.

Task 2 – Conceptual Design Review of A-Plant Forebays The ‘A’ Pumping Plant capacity was increased to 922 cfs (pump impellers were modified to increase capacity in late 1990’s). However, based on the available information, a review of the pump intake hydraulics was not completed at the time of this capacity increase.

As a component of the analyses to evaluate the feasibility of adopting lower minimum shutoff levels at the pumping plants, NHC will conduct a conceptual level hydraulic design review of the ‘A’ Pumping Plant wet well based on the Hydraulic Institute (HI) Pump Intake Design Standard (ANSI/HI 9.8-2018) published literature, and NHC’s experience in pump station and wet well hydraulics, pump station physical modeling, and pump station troubleshooting. The review will be used to assess the extent of deviations from the HI Standard, identify possible performance issues, and to inform recommendations for conceptual level modifications to the wet well to minimize flow circulation around the pumps, minimize the formation of vortices, and provide reasonably uniform flow to the pumps.

NHC will review of the relevant project information provided by the Agency; conduct a hydraulic design review of the pump station wet well design and prepare a draft and final technical memorandum (PDF format) to summarize the findings of the conceptual-level design review.

Task 3 – Pump Submergence Assessment Both GEI and NHC will coordinate to provide an assessment of the minimum pump submergence. The assessment will include estimation of the minimum required submergence over the pump suction bells to minimize the potential for strong air core surface vortices, discuss potential impacts of debris accumulation at the pumping station trash racks on pump submergence, potential adverse impacts to pumps due to the lack of recommended submergence, and potential improvements to allow for improved approach flow hydraulics at the minimum pump submergence. GEI will coordinate with KCWA to determine if all the required pump information is available to assess the existing pump performance to assess the damage. GEI and NHC prepare a draft and final technical memorandum (PDF format) to summarize the findings of the minimum pump submergence assessment.

At this time, the review will not include an assessment of the potential increase in the water level fluctuations approaching the pumping plants if a lower minimum operating level is instituted. As discussed in the CVC Plant B Water Fluctuation Assessment – (Revision 1 August 2018) Technical Memorandum by GEI / NHC team verification that the cause of the water level fluctuations is related to the hydraulic flow patterns at the bifurcation (flow split) within the canal to the ‘B’ Pumping Plants, and development of a design modification to resolve the flow instability at each of the six plants would require analysis tools such as computational fluid dynamics or physical modeling.

1

Attachment 1 Task 4 – Channel Freeboard Evaluation The one-dimensional hydraulic model of the CVC system that has been aggregated to include Pools 1 through 6 and Pumping Plants 1 through 5, will be used to evaluate three modeling scenarios to determine water surface elevations upstream and downstream in each of the pools. It is anticipated that the results of Tasks 2 and 3, described above, will help inform the Agency as to the minimum feasible submergence level that they would like evaluated in the numerical model. It has been assumed that the Agency will define the operating scenario for each model test such as the target flow rate, water level at the upstream boundary (CA Aqueduct), water level at the downstream boundary (forebay for Pumping Plants 2 through 5), potential or preferential pump combinations for each target flow, and the target freeboard.

Note that an iterative process is required through adjustment of the pumps as necessary to adjust the flow rate and attain a stable simulation (e.g. water surface profile for all six pools cease fluctuating). This process makes it impractical to exactly match the specified target flow rate. In addition, if an acceptable (stable) simulation cannot be reached with the defined upstream boundary, then the water level at the CA Aqueduct or pump combination may require adjustment until an acceptable simulation is achieved. NHC will prepare a draft and final technical memorandum (PDF format) to summarize the numerical model results.

Compensation

Compensation for Task J will not exceed $95,000 without authorization from the Engineering & Groundwater Services Manager, or such other person or officer whom the Agency or the General Manager may designate and will be consistent with the described scope in Exhibit J.

Schedule This effort will be completed by June 1, 2021. Changes to the schedule will require authorization from the Engineering & Groundwater Services Manager, or such other person or officer whom the Agency or the General Manager may designate. Terms and Conditions All work performed under Exhibit J will be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement for Professional Consulting Services between the Agency and GEI Consultants, Inc. dated November 14, 2018.

2

January 20, 2021

Mr. Eric Averett Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District 849 Allen Road Bakersfield, CA 93302-0867

Re: Proposed Scope of Work and Cost Estimate to Update the Groundwater Flow Model and Prepare 2021 Groundwater Level Projections

Dear Eric,

Thomas Harder & Company (TH&Co) has prepared this proposed scope of work and cost estimate to update the Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District (RRBWSD) groundwater flow model with actual data through December 2020 and analyze projected groundwater levels based on pumping and recharge projections for 2021 using the model. The proposed model update includes the following:

• Updating the groundwater production and recharge input to the model through December 2020, • Developing model simulated 2020 groundwater levels using the updated calibrated model, • Analyzing projected 2021 groundwater levels, • Developing eight No Project scenarios using the updated model: o Kern Water Bank (KWB) No Project o Pioneer No Project o RRBWSD No Project o All Projects Off o RRBWSD and KWB Off o RRBWSD and Pioneer Off o BM, ID4, and Pioneer Off o Strand Ranch No Project

Thomas Harder & Co. 1260 N. Hancock St., Suite 109 Anaheim, California 92807 (714) 779-3875 Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Update the Groundwater Flow Model for 2021 Groundwater Level Projections 20-Jan-21

Our detailed scope of work is as follows:

Scope of Work

Task 1 – Update the Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Model with Actual Data through December 2020 TH&Co will update the existing RRBWSD groundwater flow model with actual groundwater production and recharge data through December 2020.

Subtask 1.1 – Coordinate Compilation and Posting of Groundwater Production and Recharge Data TH&Co will coordinate with RRBWSD to update groundwater production and recharge for the model area for 2020. As in the previous years, it is assumed that RRBWSD, Kern Water Bank Authority (KWBA), and Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) will update Excel files with monthly well by well production data for January through December 2020. The updated files will be posted on the Joint Operating Committee (JOC) Drop Box account. TH&Co will convert the Excel files into model input files, as described in Subtasks 1.2 through 1.6.

Subtask 1.2 – Assign Agricultural Production to Individual Wells Agricultural water demand for the model area will be developed by TH&Co based on 2020 Mapping of EvapoTranspiration with Internal Calibration (METRIC) land use information. TH&Co will obtain 2020 METRIC data from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo to assign 2020 agricultural groundwater production to individual wells within the model area to simulate agricultural pumping.

Subtask 1.3 – Prepare Production Input Files TH&Co will convert Excel file spreadsheet data of groundwater production, as updated by RRBWSD, KWBA and KCWA through December 2020, into a file structure necessary for import into the model. As per Task 1, it is assumed that all 2020 production data including the area projects (Kern Water Bank, Pioneer Project, Berrenda Mesa, etc.), City of Bakersfield, Vaughn Water Company, West Kern Water District, and other production data will be entered into the spreadsheets by either RRBWSD or KCWA. As per recent agreement, these spreadsheets will be posted on the JOC Drop Box account for use by both RRBWSD and KWBA consultants.

2

Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Update the Groundwater Flow Model for 2021 Groundwater Level Projections 20-Jan-21

Subtask 1.4 – Prepare Recharge Input Files TH&Co will convert Excel file spreadsheet data of area project artificial recharge, as updated by RRBWSD, KWBA and KCWA through December 2020, into a file structure necessary for import into the model. As per Task 1, it is assumed that all 2020 recharge data for area projects including RRBWSD, Kern Water Bank, Pioneer Project, Berrenda Mesa, City of Bakersfield, West Kern Water District, and other artificial recharge data will be entered into the spreadsheets by either RRBWSD or KCWA. As per agreement, these spreadsheets will be posted on the JOC Drop Box account for use by both RRBWSD and KWBA consultants.

Subtask 1.5 – Update Other Recharge Features It will be necessary to update the recharge, losses and return flow for other recharge features within the model area through December 2020. These include (but are not limited to) canal losses (Buena Vista, Eastside, Outlet, KWB main), agricultural return flow, City of Bakersfield 2800 Acres recharge distribution, septic return flow, municipal return flow, and Kern River losses.

Subtask 1.6 – Prepare Updated Calibration Hydrographs It will be necessary to update the hydrographs for the 30 calibration reference wells and model boundary control wells through December 2020. The budget for this task assumes that all data is readily available and will be supplied by the KCWA.

Subtask 1.7 – Validate the Updated Groundwater Flow Model Once the model input files have been completed and entered into the model, TH&Co will run the model and compare model-generated groundwater levels with those measured in monitoring wells. It is anticipated that this will be a validation exercise whereby 2020 simulated groundwater levels are confirmed to be acceptably close to measured groundwater levels. As such, the budget for this task assumes that additional calibration will not be necessary.

The results of the updated and calibrated groundwater model will provide the baseline for comparison with the No Project scenarios described in Task 4.

Task 2 – Analyze Projected 2021 Groundwater Levels TH&Co will append the updated groundwater model with one year of potential groundwater pumping and recharge that reflect different hydrologic conditions that could occur in 2021.

3

Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Update the Groundwater Flow Model for 2021 Groundwater Level Projections 20-Jan-21

Subtask 2.1 – Prepare Model Input Files for 2021 Projected Recharge and Recovery TH&Co will prepare input files for the projection scenario. The projection scenario incorporates the Kern Fan Area Projects’ predicted recharge and recovery for 2021. The budget for this task assumes that projected monthly pumping and recharge will be provided by RRBWSD, KCWA, or others.

Subtask 2.2 – Update the 2020 No Project Model Input Files and Analyze Eight Scenarios Using the Model TH&Co will prepare No Project input files for each of the following No Project scenarios:

1. KWB Off 2. Pioneer Off 3. RRBWSD Off 4. All Projects Off 5. RRBWSD plus KWB Off 6. RRBWSD plus Pioneer Off 7. BM, ID4, and Pioneer Off 8. Strand Ranch Off

Upon completion, the revised input files will be imported into the model for analysis. Each No Project scenario will be analyzed using the updated groundwater flow model. Results from each No Project scenario will then be compared to the model calibration run (all projects on) for use in evaluating the model-wide groundwater level impacts associated with each project or combination of projects.

The budget for this task assumes preparation of model input files and analyses of eight No Project scenarios.

Subtask 2.3 – Prepare Model Output Maps and Graphics TH&Co will run the model forward in time through the end of 2021. Upon completion of the analysis, TH&Co will generate a map showing the groundwater level differences across the model area between the calibration run (all projects on) and the combined projects off scenario. TH&Co will also generate relative difference hydrographs for landowners with private wells that submitted groundwater level impact claims prior to and in 2021 (67 wells). The groundwater level impacts will be summarized in tables that show the projected impact at the end of 2021 or other time period as specified by RRBWSD.

4

Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Update the Groundwater Flow Model for 2021 Groundwater Level Projections 20-Jan-21

Task 3 – Meeting Attendance Budget is included to attend one meeting at RRBWSD near Bakersfield.

Task 4 – Optional Model Runs In the event that additional model analyses are necessary, a budget is included to analyze additional scenarios (e.g. additional with/without projects) on a per-scenario basis.

Cost Estimate The estimated cost to complete the non-optional tasks of the above scope of work (Tasks 1 through 3) is $41,155, as shown in Table 1. Analysis of additional scenarios to those included in the scope of work can be conducted for $3,430 per scenario.

I appreciate the opportunity to provide consulting services to Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District. If you have any questions, please call me at (714) 779-3875.

Sincerely,

Thomas Harder, P.G., C.HG. Principal Hydrogeologist

5

Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District TABLE 1

Cost Estimate for Hydrogeological Services Groundwater Flow Model Update and 2021 Model Projections

Principal Senior Hydro- Hydro- Staff Hydro- Reimbursable Task Description Geologist Geologist Geologist Graphics Clerical Total Labor Expenses1 Total Cost $200/hr $150/hr $100/hr $90/hr $65/hr

1 Update the Groundwater Flow Model with Actual Data through December 2020 Coordinate input file updates with 1.1 2 RRBWSD staff 4 8 $2,000 $2,000

Assign agricultural production to 1.2 individual wells in the model 4 12 24 $5,000 $5,000 Prepare production input files (through 1.3 December 2020) 1 4 12 $2,000 $2,000 Prepare recharge input files (through 1.4 December 2020) 1 4 12 $2,000 $2,000 1.5 Update other recharge features 2 4 20 $3,000 $3,000 Prepare updated calibration/boundary 1.6 wells hydrographs 1 8 24 $3,800 $3,800 Validate the updated groundwater flow 1.7 model 4 8 $2,000 $2,000 Subtotal Task 1 $19,800 $0 $19,800

1 of 3 20-Jan-21 Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District TABLE 1

Cost Estimate for Hydrogeological Services Groundwater Flow Model Update and 2021 Model Projections

Principal Senior Hydro- Hydro- Staff Hydro- Reimbursable Task Description Geologist Geologist Geologist Graphics Clerical Total Labor Expenses1 Total Cost $200/hr $150/hr $100/hr $90/hr $65/hr

2 Analyze Projected 2021 Groundwater Levels Prepare model input files for 2021 2.1 projected recharge and recovery 2 4 8 $1,800 $1,800 Update the 2020 No Project model 2.2 input files and analyze eight scenarios using the model 2 32 64 $11,600 $11,600 Prepare model output maps and graphics (one with/without project color 2.3 flood map; summary table of impacts; relative difference hydrographs for 67 wells) 4 8 40 2 $6,180 $6,180

Subtotal Task 2 $19,580 $0 $19,580

3 Meeting Attendance Attend one meeting in Rosedale to report results of model projections and answer questions 8 $1,600 $175 $1,775

Total Cost Tasks 1 - 3 $40,980 $175 $41,155

2 of 3 20-Jan-21 Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District TABLE 1

Cost Estimate for Hydrogeological Services Groundwater Flow Model Update and 2021 Model Projections

Principal Senior Hydro- Hydro- Staff Hydro- Reimbursable Task Description Geologist Geologist Geologist Graphics Clerical Total Labor Expenses1 Total Cost $200/hr $150/hr $100/hr $90/hr $65/hr

4 Optional Model Runs

Prepare model input files for one 4.1 project operational scenario 1 4 8 $1,600 $1,600 Prepare model output maps and graphics for one project operational scenario (one with/without project color 4.2 flood map; update summary table of impacts; relative difference hydrographs for nine wells) 1 3 10 2 $1,830 $1,830 Subtotal Task 4 $3,430 $0 $3,430

1 Reimbursable expenses include driving mileage 2 Assumes that all groundwater production and recharge data for 2020 will be compiled into Excel spreadsheets by RRBWSD staff or others.

3 of 3 20-Jan-21 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT

THIS CONSULTANT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 10th day of March, 2021 (“Effective Date”), by and between ERIC AVERETT, an individual, hereinafter referred to as “Consultant,” and ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT, a California water storage district, hereinafter referred to as “Client.”

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, Client is a public agency providing water management, recharge, recovery, storage, and related services;

WHEREAS, Client desires to retain Consultant to perform the services described herein;

WHEREAS, Consultant has specialized knowledge in the area of water management, recharge, recovery, storage, and related services, and has established various contacts who work in such areas;

WHEREAS, Consultant has been employed as the General Manager of Client for more than a decade, and plans to be separated from his employment with Client as of the effective date of this Agreement;

WHEREAS, Client and Consultant desire to enter into this Agreement providing for, among other things, retention of Consultant’s services by Client upon the terms and conditions hereinafter specified; and

NOW, THEREFORE, Client and Consultant agree as follows:

1. Agreement. Client shall retain Consultant, and Consultant shall assist Client by providing Client with transitional services related to Consultant’s departure from employment with Client. In this capacity, Consultant may be called upon by Client to assist Client’s current and future employees and consultants by establishing and developing contacts with other persons and entities (both public and private) that provide water management services (such as water consultants, water districts, water related associations, and the like), by attending meetings related to water management when Consultant’s knowledge of a particular subject matter to be discussed is necessary to further Client’s interests, and by responding to inquiries from Client’s existing and future employees and consultants on matters where Consultant’s knowledge of Client’s operations, programs, and prior actions will assist with the efficient operation of Client’s business affairs. Notwithstanding the specificity in the foregoing, Consultant may be called upon to perform any services requested by Client that are reasonably related Client’s water management and business activities generally.

CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 1 of 4

2. Term/Termination. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the day and date first written above, and shall terminate six months thereafter. The parties may mutually agree in writing to extend the term of this Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, with or without cause, upon fifteen (15) days’ written notice to the other party.

3. Duties of Consultant; Client Contact. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have the obligation and responsibility to perform the services described in this Agreement. Consultant shall perform such services as requested in response to either oral or written direction from Client, including its current and future employees and consultants. Consultant’s primary contact for receiving direction from Client shall be the Engineer- Manager or any member of the Board of Directors.

4. Time Requirements. Consultant will be expected to be available to devote to Client at least the specific amount of time specified in paragraph 5 as the basis for Consultant’s retainer. Notwithstanding the amount of time specified as the basis of Consultant’s retainer, Consultant shall devote such additional time, energy, and skill as is reasonably necessary to perform Consultant’s duties hereunder; however, it is understood that Consultant is free to dispose of Consultant’s remaining time, energy and skill in such manner as Consultant deems advisable.

5. Compensation to Consultant. Client shall pay to Consultant two-thousand-five-hundred- dollars ($2500.00) per month as a retainer for up to 10 hours of service each month. For each hour of service provided by Consultant in excess of ten (10) hours in any month, Client shall pay the Consultant two-hundred-fifty-dollars ($250.00) per hour. Consultant shall, on a monthly basis and during the term of this Agreement and any extension thereof, provide an invoice to Client indicating amounts owed to Consultant by Client.

6. Relation of the Parties. Consultant is retained by Client only for the purposes and to the extent set forth in this Agreement and Consultant’s relationship to Client shall, during the term of this Agreement, be that of an Independent Contractor. In this regard, Consultant shall provide the services hereunder according to his own methods and is not subject to the Client’s control as to the end product, final result of work, or manner and means by which the work is performed. Client shall not withhold from sums becoming payable to the Consultant hereunder, any amounts for State or Federal Income Tax, or for FICA (Social Security) Taxes, or any other sums required to be or typically withheld on behalf of employees. Consultant shall not be considered as having an employee status or as being entitled to participate in any plans, arrangements or distributions by Client pertaining to or in connection with any benefit plans or payments extended to Client’s employees, including but not limited to any contributions or benefits related to Client’s participation in the CalPERS retirement program.

CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 2 of 4

7. Professional Responsibility. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to interfere with or otherwise affect the rendering of services by Consultant in accordance with Consultant’s independent and professional judgment. Consultant shall perform all services in accordance with generally accepted practices and principles of Consultant’s trade or profession, and Consultant shall at all times perform Consultant’s duties in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the practice of such trade or profession in the State of California.

8. Confidential Information.

a. Client and Consultant acknowledge that during the term of this Agreement and in the course of the discharge of Consultant’s duties hereunder, Consultant may have access to and become acquainted with confidential plans, programs, data, strategy, or other information provided by or obtained on behalf of Client, and that all such information is confidential unless disclosure is specifically authorized by Client. Consultant specifically agrees that he will not misuse, misappropriate, or disclose in writing, orally or by electronic means, any confidential information provided by or obtained on behalf of Client, directly or indirectly, to any other person or entity, or use such information in any way, either during the term of this agreement or at any other time thereafter, except as is required in the course of work hereunder.

b. Client and Consultant acknowledge that all files, records, documents, drawings, specifications, and similar items provided by or obtained on behalf of Client, whether maintained in hard copy, on computers, or on line and relating to work performed pursuant to this Agreement, are and shall remain the property of Client and shall be returned and delivered to Client upon the completion of work.

c. Client and Consultant acknowledge that all work product created by Consultant and paid for by Client shall belong to Client.

9. Notice. Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be deemed given on the third (3rd) business day following mailing of any such notice, postage paid, to the address set out hereinabove or such other address as a party may designate in the manner herein provided, or upon the same day if given by facsimile with a transmission receipt acknowledgement.

10. Income Tax Designation. In the event that the Internal Revenue Service should determine that Consultant is, according to I.R.S. guidelines, an employee subject to withholding and social security contributions, Consultant shall acknowledge, as the Consultant acknowledges herein, that all payments to Consultant hereunder are gross payments, and Consultant is responsible for all income taxes, other withholdings which are typically the responsibility of an employee, and social security payments thereon.

CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 3 of 4

11. License/Insurance. At all times during which Consultant is performing work under the terms of this Agreement, Consultant will maintain a valid California driver’s license and such other licenses as are necessary or appropriate in the performance of Consultant’s duties. Consultant shall, upon request, provide Client with any information reasonably requested by Client pertaining to such license(s). Consultant shall immediately notify Client of any lapse or revocation of any such license(s). Consultant shall at all times during the performance of work under this Agreement maintain at least statutorily required automobile liability insurance coverage.

12. Consultant CalPERS Status. Consultant represents that he shall not enter retirement status or receive any CalPERS retirement allowance during the term of this Agreement; Consultant shall provide Client with at least thirty (30) days’ written notice of any change in his retirement status during the term of this Agreement.

13. Controlling Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any legal action is instituted to interpret or enforce this Agreement, venue of such action shall be in Kern County, California.

14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the hiring of Consultant for the services described herein, and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to that subject matter in any manner whatsoever. This Agreement shall not be changed or superseded except in writing by one party and agreed to in writing by the other party to this Agreement. There are no other applicable terms or conditions than those which are a part of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

CLIENT: ROSEDALE-RIO BRAVO WATER STORAGE DISTRICT

By:______Roy Pierucci

CONSULTANT: ERIC AVERETT

By:______Eric Averett

CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 4 of 4

TO: Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Board of Directors Agenda Item 8.d.

FROM: Dan Raytis

DATE: March 9, 2021

RE: Consideration of Appointment of Engineer-Manager as District Representative to Various Committees

Background

Due to the departure of the District’s General Manager, there are several board and committee positions that the District will need to fill with existing District staff or Board members.

Recommended Motion

Staff recommends that the Board appoint the following individuals as the District’s representative to the various boards and committees upon which the District has representatives at the following entities:

• Dan Bartel, District Engineer-Manager:

• Kern Fan Authority • Sites Project Authority • South Valley Water Resources Authority • James Water Bank Authority • Cross Valley Canal Advisory Committee • Pioneer Project Committee

• Markus Nygren, Engineer-Tech:

• Kern Fan Monitoring Committee • Semitropic Monitoring Committee

• Zach Smith, Operations Manager:

• Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority

Region 3

MEMORANDUM

Date: February 17, 2021

To: Region 7 Member Agency Presidents and General Managers (sent via e-mail)

From: ACWA Region 7 Board

The Region 7 Board is looking for ACWA members who are interested in leading the direction of ACWA Region 7 for the remainder of the 2020-2021 term. The Board is seeking candidates from Region 7 to fill two board vacancies.

The leadership of ACWA’s ten geographical regions is integral to the leadership of the Association as a whole. The Chair and Vice Chair of Region 7 serve on ACWA’s Statewide Board of Directors and recommend all committee appointments for Region 7. The members of the Region 7 Board determine the direction and focus of region issues and activities. Additionally, they support the fulfillment of ACWA’s goals on behalf of members.

If you, or someone within your agency, are interested in serving in a leadership role within ACWA by becoming a Region 7 Board Member, please familiarize yourself with the Role of the Regions and Responsibilities; and the Region 7 Rules and Regulations HERE and complete the following steps:

. Complete the Nomination Form HERE . Obtain a Resolution of support from your agency’s Board of Directors (sample resolution HERE ) (The Resolution may be submitted following the appointment by the Region Board) . Submit the requested nomination form to ACWA by 5:00 p.m. March 18, 2021

The Region 7 Board will make their appointment shortly thereafter and will inform the region of the results.

If you have any questions, please contact ACWA Senior Regional Affairs Representative Michael Cervantes at [email protected],or call (916) 441- 4545.

REGION BOARD CANDIDATE NOMINATION FORM

Name of Candidate: ______Agency: ______Title:______Agency Phone:______Direct Phone:______E-mail: ______ACWA Region:______County: ______Address: ______

Agency Function(s): (check all that apply) Wholesale Sewage Treatment Flood Control Urban Water Supply Retailer Groundwater Management / Replenishment Ag Water Supply Wastewater Reclamation Other:

Describe your ACWA-related activities that help qualify you for this office:

In the space provided, please write or attach a brief, half-page bio summarizing the experience and qualifications that make you a viable candidate for ACWA Region leadership. Please include the number of years you have served in your current agency position, the number of years you have been involved in water issues and in what capacity you have been involved in the water community.

I acknowledge that the role of a region board member is to actively participate on the Region Board during my term, including attending region board and membership meetings, participating on region conference calls, participating in ACWA’s Outreach Program, as well as other ACWA functions to set an example of commitment to the region and the association. I hereby submit my name for consideration by the Nominating Committee. (Please attach a copy of your agency’s resolution of support/sponsorship for your candidacy.)

______Signature Title Date

Submit completed form to Petra Rice at [email protected].

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE (DISTRICT NAME) PLACING IN NOMINATION (NOMINEE NAME) AS A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES REGION ___ (POSITION)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF (DISTRICT NAME) AS FOLLOWS:

A. RecitalsU

(i) The Board of Directors (Board) of the (District Name) does encourage and support the participation of its members in the affairs of the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA).

(ii) (Nominee Title), (Nominee Name) is currently serving as (Position) for ACWA Region ___ and/or

(iii) (Nominee Name) has indicated a desire to serve as a (Position) of ACWA Region ____.

B. ResolvesU

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF (DISTRICT NAME),

(i) Does place its full and unreserved support in the nomination of (Nominee Name) for the (Position) of ACWA Region ____.

(ii) Does hereby determine that the expenses attendant with the service of (Nominee Name) in ACWA Region ____ shall be borne by the (District Name).

Adopted and approved this ____ day of ____ (month) 2021.

______(Nominee Name), (Title) (SEAL) (District Name)

December 11, 2018

ATTEST:

______(Secretary Name), Secretary

I, (SECRETARY NAME), Secretary to the Board of Directors of (District Name), hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said District, held on the ____ day of ____ (month) 2021, and was adopted at that meeting by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:

______(Secretary Name), Secretary to the Board of Directors of (District Name)

December 11, 2018

THE ROLE OF THE REGIONS

GENERAL DUTIES / RESPONSIBILITIES FOR ACWA Regions provide the REGION OFFICERS grassroots support to advance Region Chair ACWA’s legislative and Serves as a member of the ACWA Board of Directors at regulatory agenda. bimonthly meetings at such times and places as the Board may determine. The Chair will also call at least two Region membership meetings to be held at each of the ACWA Conferences and periodic Region Board meetings. Background Serves as a member of ACWA’s Outreach Program, and As a result of ACWA’s 1993 strategic planning encourages region involvement. Appoints Outreach Captain process, known as Vision 2000, ACWA to help lead outreach effort within the region. modified its governance structure from one Presides over all region activities and ensures that such activities that was based on sections to a regional- promote and support accomplishment of ACWA’s Goals. based configuration. Ten regions were established to provide geographic balance Makes joint recommendations to the ACWA President and to group agencies with similar interests. regarding regional appointments to all ACWA committees. Appoints representatives in concurrence of the region board, Primary Charge of Regions to serve on the region’s nominating committee with the To provide a structure where agencies approval of the region board. can come together and discuss / resolve Facilitates communication from the region board and the issues of mutual concern and interest region membership to the ACWA board and staff. and based on that interaction, provide representative input to the ACWA board. Region Vice Chair To assist the Outreach Task Force in Serves as a member of the ACWA Board of Directors at building local grassroots support for the bimonthly meetings at such times and places as the Board ACWA Outreach Program in order to may determine. The Vice Chair will also participate in at least advance ACWA’s legislative and regulatory two Region membership meetings to be held at each of the priorities as determined by the ACWA ACWA Conferences and periodic Region Board meetings. Board and the State Legislative, Federal Performs duties of the Region Chair in the absence of the chair. Affairs or other policy committees. Serves as a member of ACWA’s Outreach Program, and To provide a forum to educate region encourages region involvement. members on ACWA’s priorities and issues of local and statewide concern. Makes joint recommendations to the ACWA president regarding regional appointments to all ACWA committees. To assist staff with association membership recruitment at the regional level. Region Board Member To recommend specific actions to the ACWA Board on local, regional, state and Participate in at least two Region membership meetings to be federal issues as well as to recommend held at each of the ACWA Conferences and periodic Region endorsement for various government Board meetings. offices and positions. Supports program planning and activities for the region. Region chairs and vice chairs, with support Actively participates and encourages region involvement in from their region boards, provide the ACWA’s Outreach Program. regional leadership to fulfill this charge. May serve as alternate for the chair and/or vice chair in their Note: Individual region boards CANNOT take absence (if appointed) to represent the region to the ACWA positions, action or disseminate communication Board. on issues and endorsements without going through the ACWA Board structure.

ACWA Region 7 Rules & Regulations

Each region shall organize and adopt rules and regulations for the conduct of its meetings and affairs not inconsistent with the Articles of Incorporation or bylaws of the Association (ACWA Bylaw V, 6.).

Officers

The chair and vice chair shall be from different counties.

There shall be no more than three directors elected to the Region 7 board from either county. The chair will appoint a secretary to the Board if one is deemed necessary.

The chair and vice chair shall serve for one two-year term, and they shall not serve consecutive terms in the same position.

The chair and vice chair shall each individually appoint their alternate from among the Region 7 board.

Meetings

A Region 7 board meeting will be called by the chair or vice chair of the region to consider recommendations to the Region 7 membership regarding issues impacting the region.

The chair will determine if and when non-members should be invited to regional activities or events.

Attendance

If a region chair or vice chair is no longer allowed to serve on the Board of Directors due to his / her attendance, the region board shall appoint from the existing region board a new region officer. (ACWA Policy & Guideline Q, 1.) If a region chair or vice chair misses three consecutive region board / membership meetings, the same process shall be used to backfill the region officer position. (ACWA Policy & Guideline Q, 1.) If a region board member has three consecutive unexcused absences from a region board meeting or general membership business meeting, the region board will convene to discuss options for removal of the inactive board member. If the vacancy causes the board to fail to meet the minimum requirement of five board members, the region must fill the vacancy according to its rules and regulations. (ACWA Policy & Guideline Q, 3.)

Elections

All nominations received for the region chair, vice chair and board positions must be accompanied by a resolution of support from each sponsoring member agency, signed by an authorized representative of the Board of Directors. Only one individual may be nominated from a given agency to run for election to a region board. Agencies with representatives serving on the nominating committees should strive not to submit nominations for the region board from their agency. (ACWA Policy & Guideline P, 2.)

Election ballots will be e-mailed to ACWA member agency general managers and presidents.

Electing the Region 7 board members: When possible, the two individuals receiving the most votes from Tulare County and the two individuals receiving the most votes from Kern County will fill the first four Region 7 board positions. The individual with the next highest number of votes will become the fifth Region 7 board member, regardless of county designation.

See current region election timeline for specific dates.

The nominating committee shall consist of four individuals; no more than two individuals from each county.

The nominating committee should pursue qualified members within the region to run for the region board, and should consider geographic diversity, agency size and focus in selecting a slate.

Endorsements

ACWA, as a statewide organization, may endorse potential nominees and nominees for appointment to local, regional, and statewide commissions and boards. ACWA’s regions may submit a recommendation for consideration and action to the ACWA Board of Directors to endorse a potential nominee or nominee for appointment to a local, regional or statewide commission or board. (ACWA Policy & Guideline P, 3.)

Committee Recommendations & Representation

All regions are given equal opportunity to recommend representatives of the region for appointment to a standing or regular committee of the Association. If a region fails to provide full representation on all ACWA committees, those committee slots will be left open for the remainder of the term or until such time as the region designates a representative to complete the remainder of the term. (ACWA Policy & Guideline P, 4. A.) At the first region board / membership meeting of the term, regions shall designate a representative serving on each of the standing and regular committees to serve as the official reporter to and from the committee on behalf of the region to facilitate input and communication. (ACWA Policy & Guideline P, 4. B.)

Tours

ACWA may develop and conduct various tours for the regions. All tour attendees must sign a “release and waiver” to attend any and all region tours. Attendees agree to follow environmental guidelines and regulations in accordance with direction from ACWA staff; and will respect the rights and privacy of other attendees. (ACWA Policy & Guideline P, 6.)

Finances

See “Financial Guidelines for ACWA Region Events” document.

Amending the Region Rules & Regulations

ACWA policies and guidelines can be amended by approval of the ACWA Board of Directors. The Region 7 Rules & Regulations can be amended by a majority vote of those present at any Region 7 meeting as long as a quorum is present.

Region 7

ACWA Region 7 Board 2020-2021 Term

Chair: Justin Mendes, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage David G. Bixler, Kaweah River Power Authority District 3143 W. Zumwalt Ave. 1001 Chase Ave Tulare, CA 93274 Corcoran, CA 93212 Phone: (559)737-8696 Phone: (559) 992-4217 Email: [email protected] Direct: (559) 707-8866 Position: Vice Chair Email: [email protected] Position: Regulatory Specialist

Vice Chair: Byron Glennan, Rosamond Community Services District P.O Box 817 Rosamond, CA 93560 Phone: (661)256-3411 Cell: (661)256-2889 Email: [email protected] Position: Director

Board Members: Johnny Amaral, Friant Water Authority 854 N. Harvard Avenue Lindsay, CA 93247 Phone: (559) 562-6305 Cell: (559) 799-6192 Email: [email protected] Position: Chief of External Affairs

Tom Barcellos, Lower Tule River Irrigation District 14851 Road 168 Porterville, CA 93257 Phone: 559.686.4716 Cell: (559)730-6895 Email: [email protected] Position: Director

Michael Cervantes, Regional Affairs Representative, [email protected] 980 9th Street, Suite 1000, Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916.441.4545 www.acwa.com REGION MAP

Jennifer Rotz Del Norte REGIONS Regional Affairs Representative  Siskiyou 1, 3, 5 Modoc [email protected]

Michael Cervantes REGIONS Senior Regional Affairs Representative Shasta 2, 6, 7 Trinity Lassen Humboldt [email protected]

Tehama Ana Javaid 1 Plumas REGION 4 Region & Member Engagement Specialist II  Butte Glenn Sierra [email protected] Mendocino 3 Nevada

Colusa Sutter Yuba Placer Lake 2 Augustine Han REGIONS Regional Affairs Representative  El Dorado Yolo 8, 9, 10 Sonoma Napa Alpine [email protected]

Amador Sacramento

Solano Calaveras

Marin Tuolumne San Contra Mono 4Costa Joaquin San Francisco» Alameda Mariposa Stanislaus San Mateo

Santa Clara Merced Santa Cruz Madera Fresno

San Inyo Benito

Tulare Monterey 5 6Kings

San Luis Kern Obispo 7

San Bernardino Santa Barbara

Ventura

Los Angeles

8 Riverside Orange 9

Imperial

San Diego Rev. 6/2/20 10

ACWA Public Water Agency Members by County

Alameda Boron Community Services District Madera Irrigation District Mission Springs Water District Central San Joaquin Water Stanislaus Alameda County Water District Buena Vista Water Storage District Madera Water District Palo Verde Irrigation District Conservation District City of Modesto, Utilities Department City of Pleasanton Cawelo Water District Madera-Chowchilla Water and PA Pinyon Pines County Water District Mountain House Community Del Puerto Water District Dublin San Ramon Services District City of Tehachapi Rancho California Water District Services District Lake Don Pedro Community Services Marin East Bay Municipal Utility District Delano-Earlimart ID Groundwater Riverside County Flood Control & North San Joaquin Water District Bolinas Community PUD Zone 7 Water Agency Sustainability Water Conservation District Conservation District Modesto Irrigation District Marin Municipal Water District Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District Riverside Public Utilities Pescadero Reclamation District Oakdale Irrigation District Alpine North Marin Water District Frazier Park Public Utilities District Salton Sea Authority #2058 Patterson Irrigation District Kirkwood Meadows PUD Stinson Beach County Water Golden Hills CSD San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency Reclamation District #2026 Stanislaus Regional Water Authority District Amador Greenfield County Water District Santa Ana Watershed Project South San Joaquin Irrigation Turlock Irrigation District Amador Water Agency Indian Wells Valley Water District Mariposa Authority District West Stanislaus Irrigation District Kern County Water Agency Mariposa Public Utilities District Santa Rosa Regional Resources Stockton East Water District Sutter Butte Kern Delta Water District Authority The West Side Irrigation District Brophy Water District Butte Water District Kern Tulare Water District Mendocino Western Municipal Water District Woodbridge Irrigation District Feather Water District Ducor Community Services District Lost Hills Water District Brooktrails Township Community San Mateo Reclamation District #1500 Paradise Irrigation District Mojave PUD Services District Sacramento Bay Area Water Supply & South Sutter Water District Reclamation District #2047 North Kern WSD Calpella County Water District American River Flood Control Conservation Agency Sutter Extension Water District Richvale Irrigation District Rand Communities WD Laytonville County Water District District Coastside County Water District Tehama South Feather Water and Power Rosamond CSD Mendocino County Russian River Carmichael Water District Mid-Peninsula Water District Corning Water District Agency Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD Flood Control & Water Thermalito Water & Sewer District Millview County Water District Citrus Heights Water District Montara Water & Sanitary District Semitropic WSD Trinity Western Canal Water District Redwood Valley County WD City of Folsom North Coast County Water District Shafter-Wasco ID Weaverville Community Services Upper Russian River Water Agency City of Sacramento - Dept. of San Francisquito Creek Joint Calaveras Southern San Joaquin MUD District Willow County Water District Utilities Powers Authority Calaveras County Water District Tehachapi-Cummings County WD Del Paso Manor Water District Westborough Water District Tulare Calaveras Public Utility District West Kern WD Merced Delta Conveyance Design and Alpaugh Community Services District San Andreas Sanitary District Westside Water Authority Central California Irrigation District Santa Barbara Construction Authority Alpaugh Irrigation District Utica Water Power Authority Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa WSD Delhi County Water District Cachuma Operation and Elk Grove Water District, Dept. of Alta Irrigation District Eastside Water District Maintenance Board Colusa Kings FRCD County of Tulare, County East Turlock Subbasin Carpinteria Valley Water District Colusa County Water District Angiola Water District Fair Oaks Water District Administration Office Groundwater Sustainability Agency Central Coast Water Authority Knights Landing Ridge Drainage Atwell Island Water District North Delta Water Agency Deer Creek & Tule River Authority Grassland Water District City of Buellton District Corcoran Irrigation District Omochumne-Hartnell WD Eastern Tule GSA JPA Henry Miller Rec. District #2131 City of Santa Barbara Princeton-Codora-Glenn Irrigation Deer Creek Storm Water District Reclamation District #1000 Exeter Irrigation District Le Grand Community Services Goleta Water District District El Rico GSA Rio Linda/Elverta Community WD Friant Power Authority District Los Alamos Community Services Reclamation District #1004 Empire West Side Irrigation District Sacramento County Water Agency Friant Water Authority Merced Integrated Regional Water District Reclamation District #108 Green Valley Water District Sacramento Suburban WD Ivanhoe Irrigation District Management Authority Mission Hills Community Services Sacramento River West Side Levee Kings County Water District South Yuba Water District Ivanhoe Public Utilities District Merced Irrigation District District District Lakeside Irrigation Water District Kaweah Delta Water Conservation Planada Community Services San Benito Montecito Sanitation District Sites Project Joint Powers Authority Tri-County Water Authority District District City of San Juan Bautista Montecito Water District Tulare Lake Basin WSD Kaweah River Power Authority San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water San Benito County Water District Santa Ynez River Water Contra Costa W.H. Wilbur Rec. District #825 Kings River East Groundwater Authority Sunnyslope County Water District Conservation District Improvement Byron Bethany Irrigation District Sustainability Agency Lake San Luis Water District District No. 1 Contra Costa Water District San Bernardino Kings River Water District Clearlake Oaks County Water Vandenberg Village Community Diablo Water District Apple Valley Foothill County WD Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District District Mono Services District East Contra Costa Irrigation District Apple Valley Heights County WD Lower Tule River Irrigation District Hidden Valley Lake Community Mammoth Community WD El Dorado Big Bear City Community Services Santa Clara Lower Tule River Irrigation District Services District Monterey El Dorado County Water Agency District City of Mountain View GSA Aromas Water District El Dorado Irrigation District Los Angeles Big Bear Municipal Water District Purissima Hills Water District Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Castroville Community Services Georgetown Divide PUD Antelope Valley State Water Chino Basin Water Conservation Valley Water Sustainability Agency Contractors District District Orosi Public Utilities District South Tahoe Public Utilities District Santa Cruz Antelope Valley-East Kern WA Marina Coast Water District Chino Basin Watermaster Pixley Irrigation District Central Water District Fresno Azusa Light & Water Monterey One Water City of Rialto/Rialto Utility Pixley Irrigation District GSA City of Santa Cruz Water Dept. City of Fresno Central Basin MWD Monterey Peninsula Water Authority Porterville Irrigation District City of Watsonville Water Consolidated Irrigation District Cresenta Valley Water District Management District Crestline Village Water District Saucelito Irrigation District Department Dudley Ridge Water District City of Compton Pebble Beach Community Services Crestline-Lake Arrowhead WA South Valley Water Association Pajaro Valley Water Management Firebaugh Canal Water District City of Glendora-Water Division District Cucamonga Valley Water District South Valley Water Banking Authority Agency Free Water County Water District City of La Verne East Valley Water District St. Johns Water District Napa Pajaro/Sunny Mesa Community Fresno Irrigation District City of Long Beach Water Dept. Hi-Desert Water District Stone Corral Irrigation District Circle Oaks County Water District Services District Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control Devils Den Water District Inland Empire Utilities Agency Terra Bella Irrigation District Scotts Valley Water District District Foothill Municipal Water District Nevada Joshua Basin Water District Tri-Valley Water District Fresno Slough Water District Nevada Irrigation District Soquel Creek Water District Glendale Water & Power Mariana Ranchos County WD Tulare Irrigation District Friant North Authority Kinneloa Irrigation District San Juan Ridge County WD Mojave Water Agency Shasta Tuolumne James Irrigation District La Canada Irrigation District Sierra Lakes County Water District Monte Vista Water District Anderson-Cottonwood ID Tri-Dam Project Kings River Water District La Puente Valley County WD Truckee Donner PUD San Bernardino Valley Municipal Bella Vista Water District Laguna Irrigation District Tuolumne County Water Agency Las Virgenes Municipal WD Orange Water District Centerville Community Services Laton Community Service District Tuolumne Utilities District Littlerock Creek Irrigation District City of Newport Beach San Bernardino Valley Water District Malaga County Water District Los Angeles County Waterworks City of Santa Ana Conservation District City of Redding Water Utility Ventura McMullin Area Groundwater Districts City of Seal Beach Twentynine Palms Water District City of Shasta Lake Arroyo Santa Rosa GSA Sustainability Agency Los Angeles Dept. of Water Power East Orange County Water District West Valley Water District Clear Creek Community Services Calleguas Municipal Water District Mid-Valley Water District Main San Gabriel Basin District Camrosa Water District El Toro Water District San Diego Orange Cove Irrigation District Watermaster Cottonwood Water District Casitas Municipal Water District Irvine Ranch Water District Borrego Water District Pacheco Water District Metropolitan Water District of Fall River Valley Community Channel Islands Beach Community La Habra Heights County Water Carlsbad Municipal Water District Panoche Drainage District Southern California Services District Services District District City of Escondido Panoche Water District Orchard Dale Water District Mountain Gate Community County of Ventura Public Works Laguna Beach County Water City of Oceanside-Water Utilities Pinedale County Water District Palm Ranch Irrigation District Services District Pleasant Valley County Water District District Dept. Raisin City Water District Palmdale Water District Rio Alto Water District Triunfo Water & Sanitation District Mesa Water District City of San Diego Public Utilities Reclamation District #1606 Pasadena Water & Power Shasta Community Services District United Water Conservation District Moulton Niguel Water District Fallbrook Public Utility District Riverdale Irrigation District Pico Water District Shasta County Water Agency Ventura County, Public Works MWD of Orange County Helix Water District Root Creek Water District Pomona-Walnut-Rowland JWLC Ventura River Water District Orange County Water District Lakeside Water District Sierra Sierra Cedars Community Services Puente Basin Water Agency Ventura Water, City of Ventura Santa Margarita Water District Majestic Pines Community Services District Quartz Hill Water Districts Sierra County WWD #1 Santiago Aqueduct Commission Tranquillity Irrigation District District Yolo Rowland Water District Serrano Water District Siskiyou Westlands Water District Olivenhain Municipal Water Dunnigan Water District San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Montague Water Conservation South Coast Water District District Reclamation District #2035 Authority District Glenn Trabuco Canyon Water District Otay Water District Reclamation District #307 San Gabriel County Water District Scott Valley Irrigation District Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District West Orange County Water Board Padre Dam Municipal Water Reclamation District #744 San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water Tulelake Irrigation District Glide Water District Yorba Linda Water District District Reclamation District #999 District Kanawha Water District Rainbow Municipal Water District Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Placer Solano Woodland Davis Clean Water Agency Orland-Artois Water District Ramona Municipal Water District SCV Groundwater Sustainability City of Roseville City of Fairfield Yolo County Flood Control and Water Provident Irrigation District Rincon del Diablo Municipal Water Agency Midway Heights County WD City of Vacaville, Utilities Conservation District Reclamation District #2047 Placer County Water Agency District Department Tehama Colusa Canal Authority South Montebello Irrigation Yuba San Diego County Water Authority City of Vallejo District San Juan Water District Browns Valley Irrigation District San Dieguito Water District Maine Prairie Water District Humboldt Three Valleys Municipal WD Tahoe City Public Utilities District Camp Far West Irrigation District Santa Fe Irrigation District Reclamation District #2068 Humboldt Bay Harbor Rec. & CD Upper San Gabriel Valley MWD Cordua Irrigation District Riverside South Bay Irrigation District Rural North Vacaville Water Humboldt Bay Municipal WD Upper Santa Clara Valley Joint North Yuba Water District Beaumont-Cherry Valley WD Sweetwater Authority District Humboldt CSD Power Authority Ramirez Water District Benford-Coldwater Groundwater Upper San Luis Rey RCD Solano County Water Agency McKinleyville CSD Valley County Water District Yuba County Water Agency Sustainability Agency Vallecitos Water District Walnut Valley Water District Solano Irrigation District Imperial City of Corona Dept. of Water & Valley Center Municipal Water Water Replenishment District of Suisun-Solano Water Authority Bard Water District Power District Southern California Imperial Irrigation District Coachella Valley Water District Vista Irrigation District Sonoma West Basin Municipal Water Coachella Water Authority Bodega Bay PUD Inyo Wynola Water District District Desert Water Agency City of Santa Rosa - Water Dept. Wheeler Crest CSD Yuima Municipal Water District Madera Eastern Municipal Water District Forestville Water District Sierra Highlands CSD San Francisco Sonoma Mountain County WD Chowchilla Water District Elsinore Valley MWD San Francisco Public Utility Kern Gravelly Ford Water District Idyllwild Water District Sonoma Valley Groundwater Arvin-Edison Water Storage District Indio Water Authority Commission Sustainability Agency Le Grand-Athlone Water District Belridge Water Storage District Madera County Water and Natural Jurupa Community Services District San Joaquin Sonoma Water Berrenda Mesa Water District Resources Lake Hemet Municipal WD Valley of the Moon Water District Banta-Carbona Irrigation District

Last Updated: May 7, 2020