Agenda Kern Council of Governments Transportation Planning Policy Committee

Home , Buena Vista Canal, Calloway Canal, Fort Tejon

February Workshop

Roundabouts in Kern County Presented by John Liu

Thursday, February 20, 2020 6:00 PM to 6:25 PM in the KCOG Board Room

This workshop will be presented prior to the regularly scheduled Board meeting of the Kern Council of Governments.

AGENDA KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE

KERN COG CONFERENCE ROOM THURSDAY 1401 19TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR February 20, 2020 BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 6:30 P.M.

WEB SITE: www.kerncog.org 6:00 P.M. WORKSHOP:

Roundabouts in Kern – Presented by: John Liu

DISCLAIMER: This agenda includes the proposed actions and activities, with respect to each agenda item, as of the date of posting. As such, it does not preclude the Committee from taking other actions on items on the agenda, which are different or in addition to those recommended.

I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

II. ROLL CALL: Gurrola, B. Smith, Lessenevitch, Couch, Scrivner, Vallejo, Crump, Cantu, Mower, Alvarado, Krier, P. Smith, Reyna Congestion Management Agency Ex-Officio Members: Kiernan, Dermody, Gordon, Parra

III. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to address the Committee on any matter not on this agenda but under the jurisdiction of the Committee. Committee members may respond briefly to statements made or questions posed. They may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff for factual information or request staff to report back to the Committee at a later meeting. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES, WITH THE AUTHORITY OF THE CHAIR TO EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE FOR CONDUCTING THE MEETING. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD PRIOR TO MAKING A PRESENTATION.

Disabled individuals who need special assistance to attend or participate in a meeting of the Transportation Planning Policy Committee may request assistance at 1401 19th Street Suite 300; Bakersfield CA 93301 or by calling (661) 635-2900. Every effort will be made to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities by making meeting materials available in alternative formats. Requests for assistance should be made at least three (3) working days in advance whenever possible.

IV. CONSENT AGENDA/OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: All items on the consent agenda are considered to be routine and non-controversial by Kern COG staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Committee or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Committee concerning the item before action is taken. ROLL CALL VOTE.

A. Approval of Minutes – January 16, 2020

B. Response to Public Comments

C. FEBRUARY TDA PUBLIC TRANSIT AND STREETS AND ROADS CLAIMS FOR TEHACHAPI TOTALING $548,138 (Snoddy)

Comment: Review and recommendation of Tehachapi’s FY 2019-20 Public Transit and Street and Roads claims totaling $548,138. This item has been reviewed by the Transportation Technical

1 Advisory Committee.

Action: Approve Resolutions 20-06 and 20-07 supporting Tehachapi’s 2019-20 TDA Public Transit claim and Streets and Roads claim for $548,138 and authorize chair and the executive director to sign Resolutions 20-06 and 20-07.

D. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 OUTSTANDING PROJECT REPORT 2020 (Snoddy)

Comment: On January 7, 2020, Kern COG staff hosted a Project Delivery Update meeting with project managers throughout Kern County which included an estimated $1,563,731 of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 projects (pedestrian and sidewalk projects). The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee had reviewed this item.

Action: Reported latest Article 3 project information to staff at TTAC meeting.

E. UPDATE: SB 375 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION FROM PASSENGER VEHICLES AND ADOPTION TIMELINE FOR THE 2022 RTP (Ball)

Comment: The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is required to be updated every 4-years and contains a long range 24-year transportation expenditure portfolio fulfilling numerous policies and regulations including but not limited to public involvement, social equity, air quality conformity, congestion management, and Senate Bill (SB) 375 per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. This item is a regular update provided to the Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC).

Action: Information

F. FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019 FTA SECTION 5311 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS $1,581,646 (Snoddy)

Comment: Rural agencies providing public transportation services are eligible to apply for FY 2019/20 funding from the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) through the Section 5311 program. Nine local agencies are eligible to apply for a total of $1,581,646. This item has been reviewed by the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee.

Action: Adopt the FY 2019-20 FTA Section 5311 Kern Region Program of Projects by Resolution 20-08.

G. FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP) - AMENDMENT PROCEDURE UPDATE (Pacheco)

Comment: The Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) is a dynamic short-range list of transportation projects that is subject to change. The FTIP amendment process was last revised April 16, 2015. Additional revisions are needed to update language consistent with Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration revised procedures. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

Action: Approve revised FTIP Amendment Policy and authorize Chair to sign Resolution No. 20-05. ROLL CALL VOTE

H. PROJECT DELIVERY LETTERS – ATP, CMAQ, RSTP (Pacheco)

Comment: Presentation of project delivery letters for Active Transportation Program (ATP), Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program, and Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP). 16 projects have not yet submitted for funding authorization representing $10 million in

2 federal/state programming. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

Action: Information

I. PROJECT ACCOUNTABILITY TEAM REPORT (Pacheco)

Comment: January 7, 2020 Project Accountability Team meeting highlights and latest updates. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

Action: Information.

J. CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) – FINAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (Invina)

Comment: The Final CMAQ Program of Projects includes $22.3 million for member agency projects. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) has reviewed this item.

Action: Approve the Final CMAQ Program of Projects. VOICE VOTE

K. CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) – CONTINGENCY PROJECT POLICY AND PROJECT LIST (Invina)

Comment: Kern COG staff is proposing to add about $22 million of contingency CMAQ programming in FFY 22-23 and 23-24 in the event that projects for FFY 20-21 and 21-22 are not delivered. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) has reviewed this item.

Action: Approve the CMAQ Contingency Project Policy and CMAQ Contingency Project List. VOICE VOTE

L. REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) – FINAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (Invina)

Comment: The Final RSTP Program of Projects includes $23.9 million for member agency projects. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) has reviewed this item.

Action: Approve the Final RSTP Program of Projects. VOICE VOTE

M. KERN ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM - STATUS REPORT (Urata)

Comment: To help meet more stringent air standards, Kern COG promotes early deployment of alternative fuel vehicle technologies such as plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) and compressed natural gas-fueled vehicles. This report provides staff activity information, updates the quarterly inventory of EV charging spaces in Kern County, and provides funding information.

Action: Information.

N. FEDERAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT (PM1) “TOWARD ZERO” 2020 TARGET UPDATE (Flickinger)

Comment: Required federal process to annually monitor transportation safety performance measure progress, including encouragement of member agencies to improve safety on our streets with their transportation expenditures. This item was reviewed by the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee.

Action: Approve the 2020 Kern “Toward Zero” safety targets consistent with federal methodology and direct staff to work with member agencies and stakeholders to develop projects that will accelerate attainment of the targets.

3 O. LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) GRANTS UPDATE (Flickinger)

Comment: On October 8, 2019, Caltrans announced a Call for Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) grants. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

Action: Information.

P. BIENNIAL LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS SURVEY – FEBRUARY 2020 (Flickinger)

Comment: All Kern COG member agencies, be watching for the statewide biennial local streets and roads survey scheduled to be emailed out in early February 2020 to be used to help direct road maintenance funding to local jurisdictions. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

Action: Information.

Q. 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT UPDATE (Stramaglia)

Comment: Development of the Kern Council of Governments 2022 Regional Transportation Plan requires the review and update of the Capital Improvement Program. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

Action: Information.

*** END CONSENT CALENDAR - ROLL CALL VOTE **

V. PUBLIC WORKSHOP/PUBLIC COMMENT – 2020-2050 GROWTH FORECAST DRAFT REPORT (Raymond)

Comment: The 2020-2050 Growth Forecast Draft Report is available for review and public comment on Kern COG’s webpage https://www.kerncog.org/estimates-and-projections/. This item has been reviewed by the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee.

Action: Information.

VI. BOARD MEMBER’S MEETING REPORT: (None)

VII. CALTRANS’ REPORT: (Report on Projects in Progress)

VIII. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT: (Report on Projects and Programs in Progress)

IX. MEMBER STATEMENTS: On their own initiative, Council members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. In addition, Council members may ask a question of staff or the public for clarification on any matter, provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information, or request staff to report back to the Council at a later meeting concerning any matter. Furthermore, the Council, or any member thereof, may take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.

X. ADJOURNMENT- NEXT MEETING – The next scheduled meeting will be held March 19, 2020.

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE

Minutes of Meeting for January

KERN COG CONFERENCE ROOM THURSDAY 1401 19TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR January 16, 2020 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 6:30 P.M.

The meeting was called to order by Chair Bob Smith at approximately 6:45 p.m.

I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

II. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Crump, P. Smith, B. Smith, Krier, Reyna, Gurrola, Mower, Alvarado, Couch Congestion Management Agency Ex-Officio Members: Kiernan, Green, Gordon, Parra Members Absent: Cantu, Lessenevitch, Vallejo, Scrivner Others: John Spaulding, John Pallares, Karen King, Christine Knadler, Greg Garrett, Jay Schlosser, Troy Hightower Staff: Ahron Hakimi, Rob Ball, Becky Napier, Veronica McCulloch, Bob Snoddy, Rochelle Invina, Raquel Pacheco, Linda Urata

III. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to address the Committee on any matter not on this agenda but under the jurisdiction of the Committee. Committee members may respond briefly to statements made or questions posed. They may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff for information or request staff to report to the Committee at a later date. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD PRIOR TO MAKING A PRESENTATION

Karen King announced on behalf of Golden Empire Transit, from December 1st to the 30th the bus will be fare free. She encouraged everyone to save some money on gas and ride the bus.

A. Approval of Minutes – November 21, 2019

B. Response to Public Comments

C. PROGRESS REPORT FOR PROJECTS OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE JANUARY 2020

D. PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT-REGIONAL TRAFFIC COUNT PROGRAM E. FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) SECTION 5311 CALL FOR PROJECTS

F. REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) – DRAFT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS

G. CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) – DRAFT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS

H. CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) – CONTINGENCY PROJECT POLICY AND PROJECT LIST

MOTION BY DIRECTOR COUCH TO APPROVE AND SECONDED REYNA. MOTION CARRIED WITH A ROLL CALL VOTE.

V. FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM-DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.8

Ms. Pacheco addressed the committee with the following comment:

“Amendment No. 8 includes revisions to the Transit Program that include new projects for the City of Arvin, City of Delano, and Golden Empire Transit District. The public review period ends January 17. The Kern COG Executive Director will consider approval of the amendment on January 21. State and federal approval is required. At this time, I ask that the Chair please open the public hearing, allow for public comment, and then close the public hearing.”

VI. BOARD MEMBER’S MEETING REPORT: (None)

VII. CALTRANS’ REPORT: (Report on Projects in Progress)

Ms. Laura Gordon from District 6 addressed the committee with the following information:

UPCOMING: Route 46 – at the Wye (Antelope Grade) – Project funded in ITOP for PS&E Route 46 Seg IV 4C – have developed a strategy and are submitting fort TCEP (Trade Corridor Funds)

Upcoming Construction Projects in Kern: We have 10 projects coming in, 06-0Q920 to lower the profile of 99 at Panama and white and a pavement rehabilitation coming out in September.

Kern 184 / Sunset roundabout in October

Derby Street Signalization in Arvin on 223 has an extension to advertise till June. Refresh stripping should be happening.

Lost Hills Rehab in August. Working on detour to reduce costs.

ONGOING

Laura Gordon stated she is new and to please let her or Ahron know if anyone has any questions or anything specifically to ask from Caltrans.

Route 46 Conventional Highway Segment 4A: Widen SR 46 from a 2-lane to a 4-lane conventional highway between Lost Hills Rd and I-5.

Constructing ramps NB on and off at 5

Completion June 2020

SR 99 Rehab: Pavement rehabilitation on SR 99 in Kern County from 0.3 mile south of Palm Ave OC to Beardsley Canal Bridge and on Route 178 at Route 99/178 Separation. Funding:

Work mainly in NB side of SR 99: Reconstruction work lane 3 and 4 Extended closures: SR 204 closed at Airport estimated to open early April NB on ramps at Airport Drive are closed.

Completion estimated Summer 2012

Summit OH Bridge Rails: Replace Bridge Rails on SR 58 near Tehachapi at Summit Overhead.

Lerdo Canal Median Gap Closure: Median deck closure near Bakersfield at the Lerdo Canal on SR 99. Continue work on widening the outside shoulders of the structure • Shoulder placement (AC / JPCP) • Extended shoulder closure will begin being picked up under night closure beginning this month

Belle Terrace Overcrossing: Construct Auxiliary Lane and Replace Belle Terrace Bridge on SR 99.

Continue construction the retaining wall on NB 99 No closures scheduled

I-5/99 Bridge Separation and Pavement rehabilitation on SR 99 I-5/SR 99 junction to the Panama Lane overcrossing. (Old US 99 Overcrossing)

Work currently scheduled:

• Lowering of lanes and shoulders (vertical clearance improvement) on SB 99 at Route 5 OC. • NB on / off ramps at Herring Road are closed for CRCP and anticipate re-opening late February

Stockdale/Enos Roundabout: Construct Roundabout at SR 43 and Stockdale Highway. Oversight Local funds

All legs open, continuing with stage construction. Power lines seem to be lower than design, so Permits is being notified. 24’ and 19’ vs. 25’. (estimated) Also, reviewing traffic flow and added some signs and temporary tape arrows.

119/43 Intersection Improvements: Construct a roundabout at intersection of SR 119/43.

Roundabout is open to traffic.

Gap Closure Rehab: Roadway Rehabilitation (3R). In Bakersfield from Route 58/99 Separation to Cottonwood Road.

Continue working on reinforced concrete pavement. EB and WB periodic closure for excavation and placement of pavement 10 PM to 5 AM

Estimated Completion December 2020

SR 178: Construct rock blanket at gore areas and maintenance vehicle pullouts

The rock blanket installation work continues. Two-week closure of 178 WB onramp from Union starting next week.

Cottonwood East Rehab: Pavement rehabilitation (2R) on SR 58 in Bakersfield from the Cottonwood Road undercrossing to just east of the SR 58/184 separation.

Project is out of time – liquidated damages. All striping done, and all lanes should be open by the end of next week. Contract Acceptance – Late January 2020

Bakersfield Freeway Connector Kern 58

Multiple structures under construction. Full direction closures of 99 over the next two weeks to place FW for the bridge widening for WB 58 / SB 99 connector

Working with Janet Wheeler in providing public information and notice.

Caltrans Executive Order N-23-20 – Homeless Crisis, Unsheltered Individuals

Working on an implementation plan for possible lease of state-owned land for public use. Of the 200 declared crisis cities, none are in Kern, however, a letter will be going out to all Cities soon.

Trash Pickup Partnership

Bakersfield / Kern-COG / CT partnership – collaboration since 2013 working with the homeless shelter is being used as a role mode to other COGS. Additionally, thank you to the County of Kern for picking up the Sherriff’s portion. Jason Miao is working on the agreement and hopes to have it out by February to avoid any interruption in pickup. It allows us to cover 5, 99, 58, 119, 223, 178, 43, 184, and 65 extend our coverage.

Brent Green provided the District 9 report:

Cache Creek is half-complete with an optimistic complete date of mid-summer. The actual completion date is November 1st.

A report was completed for additional closed-circuit cameras on SR58. They are going into construction this summer.

IX. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT: (Report on Projects and Programs in Progress)

• CTC Meeting in Riverside – December 4 & 5 – There were discussions about Route 46 in SLO, Highway 99 in Tulare and Madera. Without the valley coming together and voicing our concerns the Governor’s office would not have restored funding to those projects. Mr. Hakimi will attend the next meetings, he commended everyone that worked on this issue. • SJV Regional Policy Council/Multi Agency Working Group Meeting – January 17, 2020, Mr. Hakimi will be attending with Chairman Smith and Cathy Prout. • 2022 Regional Transportation Plan Stakeholder Meeting – January 22 from 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. at Kern COG, if you know any groups, companies or business interested please let us know. • January 29 & 30 – CTC Meeting in Sacramento (STIP Hearing) • Jay Schlosser was named Civil Engineer of the Year in the Public Sector for the State of California and will move on to compete nationally.

Chairman Smith requested an update on the bike path (near the roundabout). Mr. Hakimi stated construction will be started this summer. The construction should take 30-40 work days but will not be completed by “Lightning in a Bottle” in May.

Ms. Parra asked if there would be a call for TDA article 3 projects and asked if there a list of past projects to see where progress is with them. Mr. Hakimi stated with Pete Smith retiring, the person that’s handling this is finding that many projects need to be reconciled. All projects need to be billed or not be built. The money saved will go back into the pool. We had planned on not having a call for projects in the coming fiscal year and this will free up some money. This will go before TTAC (then ultimately the Board) to possibly fund some underfunded projects or have a new call for projects, and possibly put money into new bike and pedestrian facilities. This will play out in the next couple of months so stay tuned.

X. MEMBER STATEMENTS: On their own initiative, Council members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. In addition, Council members may ask a question of staff or the public for clarification on any matter, provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information, or request staff to report back to the Council at a later meeting concerning any matter. Furthermore, the Council, or any member thereof, may take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.

XI. ADJOURNMENT- NEXT MEETING – The meeting adjourned at 7:14. The next scheduled meeting will be held February 20, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

ATTEST: ______Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director ______Bob Smith, Chairman

DATE: ______

IV. C TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director

By: Robert M. Snoddy Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC AGENDA ITEM: IV C FEBRUARY TDA PUBLIC TRANSIT AND STREETS AND ROADS CLAIMS FOR TEHACHAPI TOTALING $548,138

DESCRIPTION:

Review and recommendation of Tehachapi’s FY 2019-20 Public Transit and Street and Roads claims totaling $548,138. This item has been reviewed by the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee.

DISCUSSION:

Below is a list of Public Transit and Streets and Roads claims received by September 21, 2019 TTAC agenda deadline:

Claimants LTF STA Regional Totals Tehachapi FY 2019-20 Public Transit $189,387 $0 $189,387 Tehachapi FY 2019-20 Streets and Roads $358,751 $0 $358,751

Regional Claims $548,138 $0 $548,138

These claims have been evaluated in accordance with the following criteria: 1) the maximum funding level does not exceed claimant’s deferred revenues, plus current year apportionments, less required public transit financing; 2) claimant has conducted a public meeting within its jurisdiction to receive testimony regarding unmet transit needs and has made an appropriate finding by resolution of its governing body; 3) project(s) proposed for funding is in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and 4) claimant has not requested or received funds in excess of its current year expenditure. Staff and the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee recommends approval.

Action:

Approve Resolutions 20-06 and 20-07 supporting Tehachapi’s 2019-20 TDA Public Transit claim and Streets and Roads claim for $548,138 and authorize chair and the executive director to sign Resolutions 20-06 and 20-07. Attachments: Resolutions 20-06, 20-07, and TDA Estimates for 2019-20. 1 Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Streets, Suite 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 661-635-2900 Facsimile 661-324-8215 TTY 661-832-7433 www.kerncog.org BEFORE THE KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN

RESOLUTION NO. 20-07

In the matter of:

FY 2019-20 TDA STREETS AND ROADS CLAIM – CITY OF TEHACHAPI

WHEREAS, The State of California has declared that public transportation is an essential component of a balanced transportation system and that it is desirable that public transportation systems be designed and operated so as to encourage maximum utilization of the service for the benefit of all the people of the state, including the elderly, handicapped, youth, and citizens of limited means of the ability to freely utilize the system (Section 99220, Public Utilities Code (PUC); and

WHEREAS, The Mills-Alquist-Deddeh Act, also known as the Transportation Development Act (TDA), established public funding for the support of public transportation systems and other purposes consistent with the Act, including local streets and roads, and facilities provided for exclusive use by pedestrians and bicycles (Section 99400(a) PUC); and

WHEREAS, The Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG), as the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency, is required to ensure that the following factors are identified and considered prior to the allocation of TDA funds for street and road claims or any other purposes not directly related to public transportation services (Section 99401.5, PUC):

1) Size and location of identifiable groups likely to be dependent upon transit, including but not necessarily limited to, the elderly, the handicapped and the poor; 2) Adequacy of existing public transportation services; and 3) Potential alternative public transportation and specialized transportation services, and service improvement that would meet travel demand; and

WHEREAS, Kern COG is further required to hold a public hearing to receive testimony identifying or commenting on unmet transit needs within the jurisdiction of claimants that might be reasonable to meet by establishing or contracting for new public transportation or specialized transportation services or expanding existing services (Section 99238.5, PUC); and

WHEREAS, The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), adopted by Kern COG, established goals, objectives, and policies for the implementation of public transportation systems in Kern County, and public testimony received at public hearings, evidence Kern COG's efforts to identify transportation needs pursuant to Section 99238.5, PUC; and

WHEREAS, The RTP, adopted by Kern COG, established goals, objectives, and policies for the implementation of public transportation systems in Kern County; and

WHEREAS, Claimant has filed a claim for street and road funds pursuant to Public Utilities Code Article 8 Section 99400(a); and

WHEREAS, Kern COG, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TDA and its own rules and regulations, has received and evaluated Claimant’s Article 8 street and road claim consistent with the provisions of Section 99400(a), Article 8 of the PUC, and Section 99313.3, Article 6.5 of the PUC; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 99238.5, PUC, Kern COG has held a public hearing to receive testimony identifying and commenting on unmet transit needs within the jurisdiction of claimant; and

WHEREAS, the proposed projects are consistent with claimant’s projected TDA revenues and the Regional Transportation Plan; and

WHEREAS, Claimant proposes to use the funds for projects shown on the claim submitted by claimant and filed in the Kern COG office.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The Council, after consideration of all available information, including the RTP, the Kern COG transportation needs studies, and testimony received at public hearings, finds that:

a) There are no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet within the jurisdiction of claimants. No additional unmet transit needs have been identified which can support a public transit service which meets the legally-required farebox recovery ratio (21 Cal. Admin. Code Section 6633.2-6633.9); and b) this claim on the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) for Article 8 is consistent with the RTP.

2. This claim is approved, subject to the following conditions:

a) Claimant is herein allocated the LTF and STAF funds available for apportionment shown on Attachment "A," plus any interest and balance from prior years, for use on projects also shown on Attachment "A"); b) Before any streets and roads payments are made to claimant under Articles 8 or 6.5, those allocations approved by this Council for transit, Articles 4 and 6.5, shall be credited to claimant’s transit reserve account in trust fund #24075, Article 8, and #24076, Article 6.5; and c) Remaining Article 8 and 6.5 funds shall be credited to and retained in claimant’s non-transit streets and roads reserve account in trust fund #24075 and #24076 and shall be transferred or disbursed to claimant in accordance with Attachment "A" of this resolution and written instructions for disbursement issued by Kern COG staff.

3. The Chairman and Executive Director of Kern COG are hereby authorized to perform any and all acts necessary to accomplish the purpose of this resolution, including the submission of allocation instructions to the Kern County Auditor-Controller pursuant to 21 California Administrative Code, Section 6659.

AUTHORIZED AND SIGNED THIS 20th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

______

Bob Smith, Chair ATTEST: Kern Council of Governments

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution of the Kern Council of Governments duly authorized at a regularly-scheduled meeting held on the 20th day of February 2020.

Date:

Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director Res. 20-07 Kern Council of Governments TDA-S&R Tehachapi Page 2

BEFORE THE KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN

RESOLUTION NO. 20-06

In the matter of:

FY 2019-20 TDA PUBLIC TRANSIT CLAIM – CITY OF TEHACHAPI

WHEREAS, the Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) has received and evaluated a claim from the above-named claimant pursuant to the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and its own rules and regulations; and

WHEREAS, Kern COG is authorized by TDA to allocate monies from the Local Transportation Fund and the State Transit Assistance Fund and direct the Kern County Auditor-Controller to disburse said monies to eligible claimants in accordance with the provisions of this resolution, and approved claim, and written Kern COG allocation instructions; and

WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), adopted by Kern COG, has established goals, objectives, and policies for the implementation of transportation systems in Kern County; and

WHEREAS, a triennial performance audit and annual financial/compliance audit of claimant’s operations have been completed; and

WHEREAS, claimant’s claim, submitted and on file as part of the official Kern COG records, is made a part of this resolution by this reference.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. This allocation is made for the fiscal year 2019-20 to the claimant listed above and in accordance with Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part of this resolution by this reference; and

2. Kern COG hereby makes the following findings:

a) Claimant’s proposed transit services are responding to transit needs currently not being met in the area of apportionment; and

b) Claimant’s proposed transit services shall, if appropriate, be integrated with existing transit services; and

c) Claimant’s proposed budget, as itemized in the claim, designate revenues and expenses conforming with the RTP; and

d) The ratio of fare revenue to operating costs is sufficient to enable claimant to meet the requirements of California Public Utilities Code Sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, 99268.6, 99268.7, 99268.9, 99268.11, 99268.12, 99268.26, 99268.17, and 99268.19, as applicable; and

e) Claimant has made full use of federal funds available under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended; and

f) The sum of claimant’s allocation from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund does not exceed the amount eligible to be received during the fiscal year. Claimant may, however, be required to repay excess funds, pursuant to Title 21 California Code of Regulations Section 6735; and

g) Kern COG has considered claims to offset unanticipated increases in fuel costs, to enhance existing transit services, to meet high priority regional sub-regional transit needs; and

h) Claimant has made reasonable efforts to implement the productivity improvements developed pursuant to PUC section 99244; and

i) Claimant is not precluded by contract from employing part-time drivers or from contracting with common carriers operating under franchise or license; and

j) Claimant has received certification by the California Highway Patrol within the last thirteen months indicating that the operations are in compliance with California Vehicle Code Section 1808.1.

3. Claimant is allocated Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance fund monies in amounts not to exceed that listed on Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part of this resolution by this reference; and

4. Disbursement of transit monies, allocated for the regional planning process, shall be made from claimant’s Local Transportation Fund reserve accounts to the Kern COG planning account as the first priority payment; and

5. Disbursement of claimant’s remaining transit allocation to its local treasury shall be made as the second priority payment in mutually agreed installments; and

6. The Kern County Auditor-Controller is authorized to make disbursements of Local Transportation fund monies as they become available and in accordance with written Kern COG instructions; and

7. The Kern COG Executive Director is authorized to transmit a copy of this resolution to the Kern County Auditor-Controller in support of disbursements.

AUTHORIZED AND SIGNED THIS 20th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN: ______Bob Smith, Chair ABSENT: Kern Council of Governments

ATTEST:

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution of the Kern Council of Governments duly authorized at a regularly-scheduled meeting held on the 20th day of February 2020.

Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director Kern Council of Governments TDA-Transit–Tehachapi Resolution 20-06 Page 2 Kern Council of Governments Transportation Development Act -- "Schedule A" LTF STAF FUND ESTIMATE AND APPORTIONMENT FACTORS FY 2019/20

Revised: February 27, 2019

Prospective POPULATION POPULATION L.T.F. S.T.A.F. S.T.A.F. S.T.A.F. TOTAL Claimant BASIS RATIO POPULATION POPULATION REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE APPORTIONMENT 01/01/18 APPORTIONMENT APPORTIONMENT BASIS RATIO APPORTIONMENT ARVIN 21,696 2.40% $875,176.30 $210,514.68 54,160 0.70% $3,903.00 $1,089,593.98

BAKERSFIELD (1) 386,839 42.71% $14,824,147.62 $3,753,470.16 0 0.00% $0.00 $18,577,617.78

CALIFORNIA CITY 14,875 1.64% $600,029.84 $144,331.02 22,791 0.30% $1,642.00 $746,002.86

DELANO 53,276 5.88% $2,149,054.77 $516,933.08 171,562 2.23% $12,360.00 $2,678,347.85

GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANS (1) N/A 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 5,216,607 67.78% $375,840.00 $375,840.00

MARICOPA 1,156 0.13% $46,630.89 $11,216.58 0 0.00% $0.00 $57,847.47

MCFARLAND 15,105 1.67% $609,307.61 $146,562.70 16,480 0.21% $1,189.00 $757,059.31

RIDGECREST 28,822 3.18% $1,162,625.88 $279,657.73 372,125 4.83% $26,810.00 $1,469,093.61

SHAFTER 19,271 2.13% $777,356.30 $186,985.09 57,040 0.74% $4,110.00 $968,451.39

TAFT 9,482 1.05% $382,486.25 $92,003.14 354,385 4.60% $25,532.00 $500,021.39

TEHACHAPI 12,299 1.36% $496,118.79 $119,336.29 23,960 0.31% $1,726.00 $617,181.08

WASCO 27,691 3.06% $1,117,003.45 $268,683.72 141,482 1.84% $10,193.00 $1,395,880.17

KERN CO.-IN (1) 111,150 12.27% $4,259,405.10 $1,078,480.22 0 0.00% $0.00 $5,337,885.31

KERN CO.-OUT 204,139 22.54% $8,234,587.65 $1,980,745.59 1,265,929 16.45% $91,206.00 $10,306,539.25

METRO-BAKERSFIELD CTSA N/A N/A $1,004,397.51 $0.00 0 0.00% $0.00 $1,004,397.51 PROOF N/A $36,538,327.96 $8,788,920.00 7,696,521 $554,511.00 $45,881,758.96 TOTALS 905,801 100.00% $36,538,327.96 $8,788,920.00 7,696,521 100.00% $554,511.00 $45,881,758.96

KERN COG ADMINISTRATION N/A 1.00% $388,253.76 $0.00 N/A $0.00 $388,253.76 KERN PEDESTRIAN/BIKEWAY N/A 2.00% $768,742.44 $0.00 N/A $0.00 $768,742.44 KERN COG PLANNING (2) N/A 3.00% $1,130,051.38 $0.00 N/A $0.00 $1,130,051.38 ESTIMATED TOTAL N/A $38,825,375.53 $0.00 N/A $0.00 $48,168,806.53

$38,825,375.53 N O T E S:

(1) THE GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANSIT DISTRICT RETAINS CLAIMANT PRIORITY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND KERN-IN FUNDS. THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND COUNTY OF KERN SHALL FUND 77.68% AND 22.32% OF GET'S CLAIM, RESPECTIVELY.

(2) PURSUANT TO P.U.C. SECTION 99262, CLAIMANTS MAY DESIGNATE FUNDING FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING PROCESS. SEE SCHEDULE "B" FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS AMOUNT BY AREA OF APPORTIONMENT. Kern Council of Governments Transportation Development Act -- "Schedule A" LTF STAF FUND ESTIMATE AND APPORTIONMENT FACTORS FY 2019/20 Kern Council of Governments

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT

SCHEDULE "B" PLANNING CONTRIBUTIONS BY AREA OF APPORTIONMENT Fiscal Year 2019-2020

Revised: February 27, 2019 Prospective POPULATION POPULATION PLANNING Claimant BASIS RATIO CONTRIBUTION at 01/01/18 ARVIN 21,696 2.40% $27,067

CALIFORNIA CITY 14,875 1.64% $18,558

DELANO 53,276 5.88% $66,466

GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANSIT 497,989 54.98% $621,277

MARICOPA 1,156 0.13% $1,442

MCFARLAND 15,105 1.67% $18,845

RIDGECREST 28,822 3.18% $35,958

SHAFTER 19,271 2.13% $24,042

TAFT 9,482 1.05% $11,829

TEHACHAPI 12,299 1.36% $15,344

WASCO 27,691 3.06% $34,546

KERN TRANSIT 204,139 22.54% $254,678 - - - PROOF $1,130,051 TOTALS 905,801 100.00% $1,130,051 IV.D TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director

By: Robert M. Snoddy, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TTAC AGENDA ITEM: IV D TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 OUTSTANDING PROJECT REPORT 2020

DESCRIPTION:

On January 7, 2020, Kern COG staff hosted a Project Delivery Update meeting with project managers throughout Kern County which included an estimated $1,563,731 of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 projects (pedestrian and sidewalk projects). The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee had reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

Immediately following the January 7, 2020 meeting, Kern COG staff began contacting member agencies to learn estimated project completion schedules. Below is a list of estimated project values outstanding reported by the agencies:

Arvin – Arvin’s oldest project was reported in Septemeber of 2013 and most its recent project in September of 2018. To date, Arvin has five outstanding projects estimated to be worth $181,000.

Bakersfield - Bakersfield’s oldest project was reported in August of 2015 and its most recent project in September 2019. To date, Bakersfield has twenty two (22) outstanding projects estimates to be worth $622,302.

California City- California City’s oldest project was reported in September 2007 and its most recent project in September 2019. To date, California City has two (2) outstanding projects estimated to be worth $21,000.

1 Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Streets, Suite 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 661-635-2900 Facsimile 661-324-8215 TTY 661-832-7433 www.kerncog.org Kern County – Kern County’s oldest project was reported September 2016 and its most recent projects in September 2019. To date, Kern County has completed their projects and submitted invoices for reimbursement..

Maricopa- Maricopa’s oldest project was reported September 2016 and has no other project on record. Maricopa’s outstanding project is estimated to be worth $1,000.

McFarland- McFarland’s oldest project was reported in September 2016 and its most recent in September 2019. To date, McFarland has four (4) outstanding projects estimated to be worth $25,000.

Ridgecrest- Ridgecrest’s oldest project was reported in September and is Ridgecrest’s only outstanding project. Ridgecrest’s outstanding project is estimated to be worth $125,000.

Taft- Taft’s oldest project was reported in September 2013 and its most recent in September 2019. To date, Taft has five (5) outstanding projects estimated to be worth $160,526.

Tehachapi- Tehachapi’s oldest project was reported September 2017 and its most recent project September 2019. To date, Tehachapi has five (5) outstanding projects estimated to be worth $360,903.

Wasco- Wasco’s oldest project was reported Septmeber 2016 and its most recent project September 2019. To date, Wasco has five (5) outstanding projects estimated to be worth $67,000.

A spreadsheet detailing each specific outstanding project is attached to this staff report. Staff requests an update on every project scope and timeline. Aslo, if a project has been inactive for over four years or has been determined to be undeliverable, please inform Kern COG staff. Any project funding over four years old and has not been started or deemed to be undeliverable by an agency will be returned to the regional Article 3 account.

Action: Reported latest Article 3 project information to staff at TTAC meeting.

Attachment: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Program Spreadsheet

2 Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Streets, Suite 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 661-635-2900 Facsimile 661-324-8215 TTY 661-832-7433 www.kerncog.org Transportation Development Act Article 3 Program Project Status Status Code: 1=Not Started 2=Under Construction 3=Completed

Status Jurisdiction Auth. Auth Project Name Funding Code Date Order

Arvin 9/19/2013 M0#13-03 Bike Rack $1,000 2 Provide Arvin with application information Arvin 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 South "A" at Langford Pedestrian Improvements (I of Ill) $90,000 1 Arvin 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 South "A" at Langford Pedestrian Improvements (II of Ill) $90,000 1 Arvin 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Bike Parking $3,000 3 Awaiting invoice Arvin 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Bike Safety $2,000 2 Will deliver project on April 20, 2020

Project not deliverable - funds will be returned to Arvin 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Bikepath on Derby between Haven and Schnipper (Phase I of II) region pot Arvin total $181 ,000

Complete Billed $11 ,612 to kcog 2/7/2017 Balance is Bakersfield 8/20/2015 M0#15-04 Downtown Bicycle Parking si~OQ2] 3 $0 Bakersfield 8/20/2015 M0#15-04 Countdown heads at 50 locations (II of Ill) $61,970 2 • See note below Bakersfield 8/20/2015 M0#15-04 Brundage Lane Class 111/"A"Street Class II $138,QOCl_ 2 All funds available Bakersfield 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 SW bike lanes on Various Streets (Ill of Ill) 3 Complete billed to kcog 7/1/2016 - balance is $0 *total $123,940: Approved $69,760 to projects: At time of 2018, appropriation $54,180 was identified as reverts back to kcog; billed $20,773; TK201 & TK202 are fianalled; T8K201 & T8K202 are complete - final Bakersfield 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Countdown heads at 50 locations (Ill of 111) $61 ,970 2 invoice pending Complete billed to kcog 1/11/2018 & 2/7/2018; $0 Bakersfield 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Kern River Bike Path Rehab: Buena Vista to Coffee of 3 Project balance (Total funding $125k) (11 11) - ~ Bakersfield 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Bakersfield College area Bikelanes (I of II) $85,81 1 1 Bakersfield 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Bakersfield College area Bikelanes (II of II $21,639 1 Total $107,450 All funds available in Design phase; pr Billed $2,072.38 on 7/25/2018; $1,824 in FY 2019/20 Bakersfield 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Downtown Bicycle Parking $6,000 2 balance Bakersfield 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Build-a-Bike Program $6,000 2 Billed $3,175 6/27/2019 Billed $9,899 6/27/2019: Savings $30,080 to Bakersfield 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Bikepath between Kern River Bikepath and 21st Street ~ 3 Bikepath rehab AH to Paladino to Morning T9k228 All funds avaialble; City Streets division starting Bakersfield 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Bikepath rehab from Manor Street to Alfred Harrel Highway $102,589 2 project Jan 2020 Bakersfield 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Ped Improvements on Brundage from Oak to Pine and H to Chester (I of II $17,195 1 Bakersfield 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Ped Improvements on Brundage from Oak to Pine and H to Chester (II of I $48,103 1 $65,298 All funds avaialable. Project in design. Bakersfield 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Downtown Bicycle Parking $12,000 1 Carried over to 2019-20 Bakersfield 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Build-a-Bike Program $8,000 2 $3,175 still available $108,417 project was complete in FY 2018/19. Included $30,080 tranfer from T8k233. Billed to kcog Bakersfield 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Bikepath rehab from CALM to Paladino and Morning (Phase I of II) '8,__37£1 3 6/27/201 . balance $0 All funds available; General Services will complete Bakersfield 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Lights in Stockdale and Allen Road tunnel on Kern River Bikepath $55,000 1 project. Bakersfield 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Ped improvements on L Street from Truxtun to 23rd Street (Phase I of II) $48,934 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Program Project Status Status Code: 1=Not Started 2=Under Construction 3=Completed

Status Jurisdiction Auth. Auth Project Name Funding Code Date Order Bakersfield 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Ped improvements on L Street from Truxtun to 23rd Street (Phase II of II) $48,931 Total $95,865; $95,815 available. Project in design. Bakersfield 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Downtown Bicycle Parking $2,000 A total of $16,854 available Bakersfield 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Bike Education and Community Outreach $3,000 All funds available. Bakersfield 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Pedestrian Countdown timers $56,100 $56,100 All funds available Not available untill FY 2020/21 when $200k Bakersfield 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Beach Park to Manor KRP Rehab (Phase I) $100,000 additional funding is added Bakersfield total $622,302

California City 9/20/2007 M0#07-03 Bike Safety Program 1 requested project update - Jan 8, 2020 California City 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Sidewalk in-fill on Heather Ave (I of II) 3 Completed and Paid California City 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Sidewalk in-fill on Heather Ave (II of II) ~33.,614 3 Completed and Paid California City 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Sidewalkk Infill on Heather (I of II) $20,000 1 request project update - Jan 8, 2020 California City total $21,000

Delano (No Projects)

Kern County 8/20/2015 M0#15-04 Bicycle Parking $3,000 3 Payment in Process Dec 13, 2019 Kern County 8/20/2015 M0#15-04 North Chester Ave Pedestrian Improvements $160,000 3 Payment in Process Dec 13, 2019 Kern County 8/20/2015 M0#15-04 Niles Street Pedestrian Improvements $100?-000 3 Payment in Process Dec 13, 2019 Kern County 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Beale Ave/River Blvd Ped Improvements (I of Ill) $18,567 3 awaiting invoices - Jan 7, 2020 Kern County 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Beale Ave/River Blvd Ped Improvements (II of Ill) $95,333 3 KCOG needs to pay invoices Kern County 9/20/2018 M0-19-01 Beale Ave/River Blvd Ped Improvements (Ill of Ill) $95,334 3 KCOG needs to pay invoices Kern County 9/19/2019 M0-19-03 Bike Safety $8,000 3 KCOG needs to pay invoices Kern County 9/19/2019 M0-19-03 Bike Parking $12,000 3 KCOG needs to pay invoices Kern County 9/19/2019 M0-19-03 Lake Ming/KR Golf Course Extension (I of Ill) ,20:g 3 KCOG needs to pay invoices Kern County total $0

Maricopa 9/15/2011 M0#11-01 Bike Safety Program $1,000 requested project update informantion - Jan 8, 2020 Maricopa total $1 ,000

McFarland 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Browning Road Bikelanes $20,250 1 McFarland 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Bicycle Safety E;OOO 2 Partial billing of $904.30 on July 27, 2018 McFarland 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Bike Parking $3,000 1 McFarland 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Bike Safety Projgram $2,000 1 McFarland 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 West Kern Ave and 6th Street Curbs (I of II) $20,000 1 McFarland total $25,000

Ridgecrest 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Bowman Road Class I rehab and shade structure $125,000 Ridgecrest total $125,000

Taft 9/19/2013 M0#13-03 Bike Rack $1 ,000 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Program Project Status Status Code: 1=Not Started 2=Under Construction 3=Completed

Status Jurisdiction Auth. Auth Project Name Funding Code Date Order Taft 8/15/2016 M0#16-05 Bike Parking $3,000 Taft 8/15/2016 M0#16-05 Main Street to Rails-to-Trails Connection (I of II) $68,263 Taft 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Main Street to Rails-to-Trails Connection (II of II) $68,263 Taft 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 South 4th Street Pedestrian Improvements (I of II) $20,000 Taft total $160,526

Tehachapi 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Antelope Run Class I Bikepath Extension (I of Ill) $35,976 2 9-Jan-20 Tehachapi 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Antelope Run Class I Bikepath Extension (II of Ill) $136,104 2 9-Jan-20 Tehachapi 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Antelope Run Class I Bikepath Extension (Ill of Ill) $136,104 2 9-Jan-20 Tehachapi 9119/2019 M0#19-03 Bicycle Parking $3,000 1 9-Jan-20 Tehachapi 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Bicycle Safety Program ~ 3 Payment in Process Dec 13, 2019 Tehachapi 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 West Park Frontage Improvements (I oflll) $49,719 1 9-Jan-20 Tehachapi total $360,903

Wasco 9/15/2016 M0#16-05 Bike Safety Program $2,000 1 Wasco 9/21/2017 M0#17-03 Palm Avenue Bike and Pedestrian Improvements $25,000 1 Wasco 9/20/2018 M0#19-01 Bike Safety Program $2,000 1 Wasco 9120/2018 M0#19-01 Sidewalks around St. John's School $33,000 1 Wasco 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Bicycle Parking $3,000 1 Wasco 9/19/2019 M0#19-03 Bicycle Safety Program $2,000 1 Wasco total $67,000

Current outstanding Article 3 project dollars unreported or uncompleted $1,563,731 IV.E TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director

By: Rob Ball, Deputy Director/Planning Director

SUBJECT: TPPC AGENDA ITEM: IV E UPDATE: SB 375 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION FROM PASSENGER VEHICLES AND ADOPTION TIMELINE FOR THE 2022 RTP

DESCRIPTION:

The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is required to be updated every 4-years and contains a long range 24-year transportation expenditure portfolio fulfilling numerous policies and regulations including but not limited to public involvement, social equity, air quality conformity, congestion management, and Senate Bill (SB) 375 per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. This item is a regular update provided to the Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC).

DISCUSSION:

This periodic update report chronicles, development and implementation of the SB 375 process in Kern with recent activity listed first. The report also includes a timeline with upcoming events.

January 22, 2020 – A 2022 RTP/Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) Stakeholder Roundtable was held at Kern COG to garner input on the 2022 RTP/SCS public outreach process. Twenty- two (22) participants attended the meeting from various interest areas in the community including the Tejon Indian Tribe, Lamont/Weedpatch Family Resource Center, Caltrans, Kern County Black Chamber of Commerce, League of Women Voters, Valley Fever Awareness & Resources, Golden Empire Transit, Project Clean Air, Tejon Ranch, Leadership Council for Justice and

Accountability, Troy Hightower International, Senator Melissa Hurtado’s Office, California Alliance for Retired Americans, Congressman TJ Cox’s Office, and the cities of Bakersfield, Taft, Shafter, Tehachapi and California City. Participants provided input about how Kern COG can improve the outreach process. Recommendations included: 1) Continue the Kern County Fair Booth; 2) Mini Grant Outreach – consider providing tools to stakeholders to go into communities to gather input rather than a having a formal meeting; 3) Use Interactive Social Media; 4) Use Parent Centers connected to the Bakersfield City School District; 5) Use Advisory Councils associated with schools; 6) Provide information to the Kern County Network for Children; 7) Consider going to McDonalds Play Areas – free Wi-Fi for adults and play space for children; 8) Community events such as Taft Oildorado, California City Tortoise Days and other community festivals.

January 21, 2020 2019 - ARB emailed that the Kern 2018 SCS Technical Evaluation should be complete by ARB in mid-February 2019.

January 14, 2020 – San Joaquin Valley Inter-Agency Consultation (IAC) group, quarterly conference call, California Air Resources Board (ARB) announced that the Kern COG 2018 SCS Technical Evaluation should be completed any day now. Of the eight SCS under review, Fresno COG was completed in September, and 4 more are just beginning their review this month.

November 5, 2019 - ARB emailed that the 2018 SCS Technical Evaluation should be complete by ARB in mid-December 2019.

October 14- November 3, 2019 – 12 public workshops/events were held in 8 outlying communities with transit operators (Arvin, Lost Hills, McFarland, Shafter, Wasco, Taft, Tehachapi, and Ridgecrest) on the Long-Range Rural Transit Plan where participants were invited to also provide input on 2022 RTP/SCS principles using an online survey tool open till Nov. 8. The Plan will be used in development of the RTP/SCS to identify new rural transit projects such as Miocar – rural car sharing, EV intercity/dial-a-ride service, “Uber/Lyft” style micro transit and a new volunteer driver program.

October 10, 2019 – At a joint meeting of the ARB and the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in Modesto, Kern COG and Valley MPOs presented an update on the SCS Implementation in the Valley. View webcast recording online at: https://catc.ca.gov/meetings-events/joint-carb-meetings . Time stamp: 2:34-3:30 – Kern COG and Valley MPOs presentation (related Q&A in afternoon session as well).

October 1, 2019 – Fresno COG received their SCS Technical Evaluation from ARB which “accepted” Fresno COG’s determination that their SCS would meet the 5 and 10 percent reduction targets compared to 2005 levels, when fully implemented. The Technical Evaluation is posted online at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/fresno-council-governments-fcog . Kern COG’s SCS Technical Evaluation will be posted on line at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/kern-council-governments-kerncog when ARB has completed it. At the time of the writing of this staff report the 2018 Technical Evaluation for Kern was still under review by ARB management.

September 18-27, 2019 – Outreach booth at the Kern County Fair promoted an interactive online survey on the transportation planning principles for the 2022 RTP/SCS and has received over 200 respondents. The online survey was open from Sept. 18 – Nov. 8.

September 5, 2019 – Met with ARB staff in Modesto to discuss new SB 375 Sustainable SCS guidelines requirement for a plan over plan analysis for the 3 largest Valley MPOs along with the 4 largest state MPOs. Since that meeting ARB revised the guidelines to require the plan over plan analysis for all Valley MPOs regardless of size even though some Valley MPOs are smaller than small MPOs outside the Valley that are not required to do this analysis. Note that these guidelines are administrative and will not be adopted by the ARB. Final Draft Evaluation Guidelines are now available online at - https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/scs-evaluation-resources .

August 21, 2019 – ARB Technical Evaluation of Kern’s 2018 SB 375 SCS is currently being reviewed by ARB management. As soon as they have an update on timeline they will let us know. Fresno COG is at about the same place and staff has indicated that they both appear to be passing. Note: SCS technical reviews are administrative and not adopted by ARB. Kern COG’s evaluation will be posted online at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/kern-council-governments-kerncog .

August 19, 2019 – Indication is that ARB will still require the plan over plan analysis for the 3 largest MPOs in the Valley, San Joaquin, Fresno and Kern.

June 3, 2019 – Kern COG staff met with Mary Nichols in Modesto to discuss issues with several new requirements under the guidelines including: 85% elasticity threshold and a new requirement for plan-over-plan analysis.

May 1, 2019 – Kern Transportation Foundation hosted an industry outreach event in Bakersfield on goods movement, garnering input on freight projects in Kern to help inform development of the 2022 RTP/SCS. The event was attended by 90 business/industry stakeholders.

February 25, 2019 – Kern COG staff’s third conference call with California Air Resources Board (ARB) staff on Kern COG’s December 11, 2018 submittal of the 2018 RTP technical evaluation data requested by ARB for making their determination whether the SCS, if implemented, would meet the ARB GHG reduction targets set back in 2011. ARB is still reviewing the data and asking questions after two months and three conferences calls. The previous two calls were on January 14 & 29, 2019. The seven other Valley COGs are seeing similar levels of examination from ARB staff. ARB has two months to make their determination after they deem the submittal complete.

February 14, 2019 – San Diego Association of Governments announces they can NOT meet their new SCS GHG targets and ask for two more years to develop their 3rd cycle SCS. https://www.voiceofsandiego.org/topics/government/san-diego-cant-hit-state-climate-goals-without-major-transportation-changes/ .

February 7, 2019 – ARB Deputy Exec. Ofc. Steven Cliff, met w/ the eight San Joaquin Valley COG directors on concerns about the Draft ARB SB 375 SCS Evaluation Guidelines https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/scs-evaluation-resources.

January 31, 2019 – Valley COG directors met with ARB member Alexander Sherriffs on the non- responsiveness of ARB staff about Valley comments on the SB 375 SCS Evaluation Guidelines.

January 3, 2019 – The Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC) and the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) were presented this update on SB 375 implementation in Kern along with a copy of the SB 375 data submittal to ARB.

December 11, 2018 - Kern COG staff submitted the technical evaluation data requested for making a determination whether the SCS, if implemented, would meet the ARB targets set back 2011. The data request took nearly 4 months to fulfil.

December 4, 2018 - Kern COG Executive Director Ahron Hakimi provided verbal comments on the SB 150 report to a joint meeting of ARB and the California Transportation Commission (CTC) http://www.catc.ca.gov/meetings/ (video not posted yet at the time this staff report was written). The report shows that although SCS targets are being met, overall emissions per capita from gasoline sales are on the rise. For more info on SB 150 report go to: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/Final2018Report_SB150_112618_02_Report.pdf

On December 3, 2018, Kern COG received federal approval of the 2018 RTP air quality conformity analysis concurring that planned RTP expenditures will NOT delay air district attainment plans.

October 9, 2018 - Kern COG submitted comments on the Draft SCS Evaluation Guidelines.

August 20, 2018 - Kern COG staff had a conference call with ARB staff on the process for ARB’s SCS evaluation and began preparing the requested data.

August 15, 2018 - the Kern COG Board adopted the 2018 RTP/SCS and associated documents.

Table 1 – 2011 & 2018 SB 375 Targets for the Kern Region Per Capita GHG Reduction Target/ 2020 2035 Targets for 2014 & 18 RTP/SCS (set in 2011 by ARB)* -5% -10% 2018 RTP/SCS demonstration (August 15, 2018)* -12.5% -12.7% Targets for 2022 RTP/SCS (set March 22, 2018 by n.a. -15% ARB, effective October 1, 2018) *Note: as required by ARB, the target demonstration methodology changed significantly between 2014 and 2018 even though the targets remained the same as allowed under SB 375. This makes comparison of the 2014 target demonstration results (not reported here) incompatible with these 2018 results. For a full explanation of this issue see the discussion on pages B79-84 of ARB’s 2022 SB 375 Target setting staff report Appendix B. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/appendix_b_mpo_scenario_and_data_submittals.pdf

March 22, 2018 - ARB adopted new SB375 Targets for the third cycle RTP/SCS to be effective October 1, 2018. Next ARB target setting will be during the 2022-2026 window.

June 13, 2017 - ARB released proposed targets that were 2 percentage points higher than what Kern COG recommended for 2035. The related ARB documents are available online at https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375.htm . Kern COG’s April target recommendation letter is located on page B-143 of the ARB 2022 target setting staff report at https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/appendix_b_mpo_scenario_and_data_submittals.pdf . Kern COG and the 8 San Joaquin Valley COG’s prepared individual letters and a joint comment letter.

April 20, 2017 - the Kern COG Transportation Planning Policy Committee (TPPC) recommendation to ARB was unchanged from the December 2016 submittal at -9% and -13% reduction in per capita GHG consistent with the RPAC recommendation.

Preliminary Adoption Timeline 2022 RTP/SCS

• August 15, 2018 – Adopted 2018 RTP/SCS • October 1, 2018 - Effective Date for 3rd Cycle SCS Target (-15%/capita reduction by 2035) • Spring 2019 to Spring 2022 – Annual Community Phone Surveys - Ongoing • Spring 2019 – Adopt Public Involvement Procedure for 2022 RTP/SCS - Complete • Spring 2019 – Spring 2022: RTP/SCS Public Outreach Process • Fall 2019 – Adopt Regionjal Growth Forecast Update • October 14 – November 3 – Rural Long Range Transit Plan & RTP/SCS Workshops • Fall 2019 to Fall 2021 – Fairs/Festivals/Farmer’s Market Outreach • January 22, 2020 – 1st stakeholder roundtable sessions to vet outreach and performance measures process. • March 2020 (tent.) – 2nd stakeholder roundtable session to review adjustments to outreach and performance measure process • Summer 2020 – Begin Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) update process • Fall 2020 to Spring 2021 – Mini-Grant Stakeholder Hosted Workshops • Spring 2021 – U.S. Census population voting district file available • Winter 2021/22 – Release of RTP/SCS environmental document • Spring 2022 – Publicly agendized meetings with all 11 City Councils and the County Board of Supervisors • Summer 2022 Adopt RTP/SCS, RHNA, environmental document and associated documents

ACTION: Information

` IV.F TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi Executive Director

By: Robert M. Snoddy Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV F FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019 FTA SECTION 5311 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS $1,581,646

DESCRIPTION:

Rural agencies providing public transportation services are eligible to apply for FY 2019/20 funding from the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) through the Section 5311 program. Nine local agencies are eligible to apply for a total of $1,581,646.

DISCUSSION:

Caltrans notified Kern COG staff of fiscal year FY 2019-20 FTA Section 5311 funding for the Kern region of $1,581,646. Nine Kern COG member agencies are currently eligible for 5311 funding including the cities of Arvin, California City, McFarland, Ridgecrest, Shafter, Taft, Tehachapi, Wasco, and the County of Kern (Kern Transit). Kern COG staff apportioned fiscal year 2019-20 5311 funds by population and notified member agencies of this year’s 5311 apportionment amount.

Below is each 5311 eligible member agency’s FY 2018-19 apportionment:

Recipient Project FY 2019-20 5311 Local Share Net Project Cost Description Share Arvin Operating Cost $73,230 $716,596 $789,826 California City Operating Cost $49,347 $250,414 $299,761 McFarland Operating Cost $51,562 $71,772 $123,334 Ridgecrest Operating Cost $98,062 $610,619 $708,681 Shafter Operating Cost $65,322 $188,811 $254,133 Taft Operating Cost $32,899 $370,000 $402,899 Tehachapi Operating Cost $42,546 $227,341 $269,887 Wasco Operating Cost $93,317 $223,421 $316,738 Kern Transit Operating Cost $1,075,361 $7,205,530 $8,280,891 Regional Total $1,581,646 $9,864,504 $11,446,150

5311 eligible member agencies may submit one grant application. Obviously, the local match for both fiscal years must be estimated. Caltrans staff will be available to answer specific questions about the 5311 grant application process and the new “required” Transit Asset Management (TAM). For Caltrans District 6 and District 9, the contact is Katherine Pongratz, phone ` number is (916) 654-9955. Katherine’s E-mail address is [email protected] Kern COG staff will assist eligible member agencies with Federal Transportation Improvement Program information and signature documents.

ACTION:

Adopt the FY 2019-20 FTA Section 5311 Kern Region Program of Projects by Resolution 20-08.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF RAIL & MASS TRANSPORTATION Rural Transit and Intercity Bus Branch

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) SECTION 5311 REGIONAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP)

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019 - 2020

All Section 5311, 5311(f), and Rural CMAQ Transit Applications and POPs are due February 12, 2020.

However, if there are issues meeting the deadlines, please notify your HQ Liaison as soon as possible.

County/Region: Kern District: 6&9 Original Submission Date: 2/6/2020 Revision No. Revision Submission Date:

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2020 Section 5311 Program of Projects (POP) Regular 5311 CMAQ (A) Available Funding: Carryover (Must specify FFY): (+) 0 Estimated Apportionment [FFY 2020 ]: (+) $1,581,646 (A) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: = $1,581,646

(B) Programming (POP): Complete Parts I and II Federal Share Part I. Operating Assistance - Total: (+) $1,581,646 Part II. Capital - Total: (+) $0 (B) Total [Programmed]: (=) $1,581,646

(C) Balance Federal Share (A) Total Funds Available: (+) $1,581,646 (B) Total [Programmed]: (-) $1,581,646 * Balance: (=) $0

*BALANCE – Regional Apportionment Funds ONLY: o Please Note - . funds must be programmed in subsequent year . final approval to be determined by the Department o Request/Letter to carryover funds should include - . justification for programming postponement . purpose and project plan . letter of support from local Transportation Planning Agency

(D) Flexible Funds (CMAQ, STP or Federalized STIP): Complete Part III (For reference only). Request for transfer will be applied for directly through the District Federal Share - Local Assistance District Engineer, and Headquarters’ Division of Local Assistance. Division of Rail & Mass Transportation will (D) Part III. Flex Fund - Total: $0 receive a conformation once the transfer is completed.

FUNDING SUMMARY Federal Share (B) Regional Apportioned - Total [Programmed]: (+) $1,581,646 (D) Flex Fund - Total: (+) $0 GRAND TOTAL [Programmed]: (=) $1,581,646

Contact Person/Title: Bob Snoddy Date: 2-10-2020 Phone Number: 661-635-2916

Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) – All federal funds to be used for transit projects must be included in a federally approved STIP. A Transportation Planning Agency (TPA) must ensure that Section 5311 projects are included in the Department of Transportation’s (Department) Statewide Transportation Federal Improvement Program (FSTIP), which is jointly approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and FTA.

A copy of the federally approved STIP Page must be attached for all projects to be programmed through the Section 5311 program. The project description and associated dollar amounts must be consistent with the federally approved STIP information.

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are responsible for programming projects within their jurisdiction. Upon receiving the POPs from the Districts, Rural Transit & Procurement staff will submit Non-MPO / Rural Transportation organizations projects directly to the Department’s Division of Transportation Programming for inclusion into the FSTIP.

For further guidance see the Department’s Division of Transportation Programming website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/fedpgm.htm

PART I. Regional Apportionment - Operating Assistance For all Operating Projects - a complete application MUST be submitted with this POP. Carryover Funds Local Federal Utilized Share PROGRAM Share (Must (Excluding Toll OF PROGRAMMED (2020 specify Toll Credit Net Project PROJECTS DATE OR Subrecipient Project Description Funds) FFY) Credit) Amount Cost DOC YR AMENDMENT # Arvin Operating Assistance $73,230 $0 $716,596 $0 $789,826 FY 2019-20 March 2020 California $0 City Operating Assistance $49,347 $250,414 $0 $299,761 FY 2019-20 March 2020 Kern County Operating Assistance $1,075,361 $0 $7,205,530 $0 $8,280,891 FY 2019-20 March 2020 McFarland Operating Assistance $51,562 $0 $71,772 $0 $123,334 FY 2019-20 March 2020 Ridgecrest Operating Assistance $98,062 $0 $610,619 $0 $708,681 FY 2019-20 March 2020 Shafter Operating Assistance $65,322 $0 $188,811 $0 $254,133 FY 2019-20 March 2020 Taft Operating Assistance $32,899 $0 $370,000 $0 $402,899 FY 2019-20 March 2020 Tehachapi Operating Assistance $42,546 $0 $227,341 $0 $269,887 FY 2019-20 March 2020 Wasco Operating Assistance $93,317 $0 $223,421 $0 $316,738 FY 2019-20 March 2020

Operating $0 Assistance Funds Total $1,581,646 $9,864,504 $0 $11,446,150 PART II. Regional Apportionment – Capital For all Capital Projects - a complete application MUST be submitted with this POP.

Carryover Funds Local Federal Utilized Share PROGRAM Share (Must (Excluding Toll OF PROGRAMMED (2020 specify Toll Credit Net Project PROJECTS DATE OR Subrecipient Project Description Funds) FFY) Credit) Amount Cost DOC YR AMENDMENT # N/A

Capital Funds Total

PART III. FLEX FUNDS (i.e. CMAQ, STP, or Federalized STIP*) if applicable For Flex Fund Projects - a complete application MUST be submitted with this POP. *Federalized STIP projects must complete CTC allocation process.

Carryover Funds Local Utilized Share PROGRAM (Must (Excluding Toll Net OF PROGRAMMED Fund Federal specify Toll Credit Project PROJECTS DATE OR Subrecipient Project Description Type Share FFY) Credit) Amount Cost DOC YR AMENDMENT #

N/A

Capital Funds Total

PART IV. Vehicle Replacement Information

State Contract Local Purchase Piggyback Other Explain: ______

Vehicle Description

Type Number of Fuel Length VIN. # In Current/End Disposition Passengers Type Service Mileage Date INSTRUCTIONS Date PART I – Operating N/A Assistance

• Do not list previously approved projects (i.e. projects listed in a prior grant). • Funding split: 44.67% Local Share and 55.33% Federal Share. • Third Party Contract Requirement – all third party contracts must contain federal clauses required under FTA Circular 4220.1E and approved by the State prior to bid release. . • Net project cost does not include ineligible cost (i.e. farebox, other revenues, etc.).

PART II – Capital (Vehicles, Construction, Preventive Maintenance and Planning)

• All vehicles procured with Section 5311 program funds must be ADA accessible regardless of service type (fixed route or demand-response service). • Capital projects must contain a full description of project: A PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY (PES) is required for Capital projects other than vehicle procurement.(i.e. facility or shelter - include specifics, planning studies, preventative maintenance). The PES does not satisfy the requirements for environmental review and approval. When the agency prepares the documentation for a categorical exclusion, the Environmental Justice Analysis must be included. • Funding split: 11.47% Local Share and 88.53% Federal Share. • Procurement Contract Requirement – all documents used for procuring capital projects must contain federal clauses required under FTA Circular 4220.1E and approved by DRMT prior to bid release.

PART III. Section 5311 FLEXIBLE FUNDS [i.e. CMAQ, STP, or Federalized STIP*] if applicable:

• Request for transfer will be applied for directly through the District - Local Assistance District Engineer, and Headquarters’ Division of Local Assistance. Division of Rail & Mass Transportation (DRMT) will receive a confirmation once the transfer is completed.

• Funding split: 11.47% Local Share and 88.53% Federal Share. CMAQ may be funded up to 100% at the discretion of the Regional Planning Agency/MPO.

PART IV. Vehicle Replacement

• For each vehicle identified as replacement and/or expansion of fleet in sections II and/or III the following information is required: type (van, bus, trolley, type 1, 2, 3, 4, etc), vehicle identification number (VIN #), vehicle length (i.e. 35 ft.), passenger capacity, fuel type, in service date, current/end mileage, disposition date, and procurement type (i.e. State contract, local procurement, piggyback, etc).

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2020: All Flexible (CMAQ) CAPITAL funded projects - a complete 5311 application is required at the time a POP is submitted. POP and application should be submitted by February 12, 2020. Part II of the application (Regional Certifications and Assurances) must be complete (i.e. signature, specific project programming information).

BEFORE THE KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN

Resolution No. 20-08

In the matter of:

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SECTION 5311 AND 5311(f) PROGRAMS

WHEREAS, the Section 5311 and 5311 (f) programs of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) provides assistance to public agencies; and

WHEREAS, the FTA Section 5311 and 5311 (f) programs are intended to provide improved transportation services for rural public transportation agencies; and

WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Plan adopted by Kern COG actively promotes public transit services for rural communities:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

1. Kern COG endorses the Kern region Federal Fiscal Year 2019 apportionment of $1, 581,646 to provide assistance to agencies providing transportation services to residents in rural Kern County and directs staff to prepare an annual program of projects (POP); and

2. Kern COG hereby certifies that the recommended program of projects will meet the conditions for the 5311 program, are consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan and Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan; and

3. Kern COG assures that the operational and capital projects finally recommended for funding will be in the Federal Transportation Improvement Plan (FTIP).

ADOPTED, SIGNED, AND APPROVED THIS 20th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

______Bob Smith, Chair Kern Council of Governments

ATTEST:

I hereby certify that the forgoing is a true copy of a resolution of the Kern Council of Governments duly adopted at a regular scheduled meeting held on the 20th day of February 2020.

______Date: ______Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director Kern Council of Governments IV.G

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Raquel Pacheco, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV G FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP) - AMENDMENT PROCEDURE UPDATE

DESCRIPTION: The Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) is a dynamic short-range list of transportation projects that is subject to change. The FTIP amendment process was last revised April 16, 2015. Additional revisions are needed to update language consistent with Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration revised procedures. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION: Caltrans, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Metropolitan Planning Organizations continue to work together to clarify how to manage the FTIP. In an effort to offer greater flexibility FHWA and FTA expanded the parameters of an administrative modification. An administrative modification is a minor change to the FTIP that does not require a conformity determination, a demonstration of fiscal constraint, public review and comment, or federal approval.

Kern COG is required to incorporate these revisions into Kern COG’s “Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Policy.” There are several proposed updates to the policy but the following items are the major changes for administrative modifications:

• Threshold for adding funding to an individually listed project is limited to the lesser of 50% of the total project cost or $20 million; and • No limit on adding funds to a group project listing. Funding capacity must be available in the FSTIP/FTIP prior to processing programming changes and it must be stated in the supporting documentation.

Kern COG staff supports the changes, as they will allow more FTIP revisions to be processed quickly. The Draft Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Policy includes additional language as part of this update (see attachment). Once approved, this document will be sent to Caltrans, FHWA, and FTA for their use.

The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee recommends approval.

Attachment: Draft Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Policy

ACTION: Approve revised FTIP Amendment Policy and authorize Chair to sign Resolution No. 20-05. ROLL CALL VOTE BEFORE THE KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN Resolution No. 20-05 In the matter of:

REVISED FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMENDMENT POLICY

WHEREAS, the Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) and a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO); and

WHEREAS, the MPO is required to develop, maintain and endorse the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) with a Biannual Program of Projects for federal funding assistance; and

WHEREAS, the FTIP for the Kern region is a four-year schedule of multi modal transportation project improvements of major freeways, expressways, arterials, urban collectors, bikeways, transit, rail and aviation facilities; and

WHEREAS, in cooperation with federal, state, and local agencies, FTIP amendments must be reviewed for project content, financial constraint and air quality conformity; and

WHEREAS, revisions are made to the FTIP Amendment Policy to update language consistent with Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration administrative modification procedures.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

Kern Council of Governments adopts the revised Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Policy attached and made a part of Resolution No. 20-05 by this reference.

AUTHORIZED AND SIGNED THIS 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Bob Smith, Chair Kern Council of Governments ATTEST:

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution of the Kern Council of Governments duly authorized at a regularly scheduled meeting held on the 20th day of February 2020.

______Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director Date Kern Council of Governments

Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Policy

INTRODUCTION

Administrative Modifications or Amendments to the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) shall be submitted to Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) in writing (on agency letterhead). The request shall show all recommended changes including a description of the revision. Kern COG staff shall determine if an Administrative Modification or Amendment is necessary for the requested revision. That determination shall be made in writing by Kern COG staff prior to presenting the requested revision to the Kern COG governing Board.

The following procedures are applicable for processing amendments and administrative modifications to the Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP). In accordance with the provisions of 23 CFR 450, and FTIP. developed by Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are incorporated into the FSTIP and as such, these procedures are also applicable to TIP modifications.

In accordance with 23 CFR 450.216(n), projects in any of the first four years of the FSTIP may be moved to any other of the first four years of the FSTIP subject to the project selection requirements of 23 CFR 450.220. Such revisions do not require approval, provided expedited project selection procedures have been adopted in accordance with 23 CFR 450.220 and the required interagency consultation or coordination is accomplished and documented.

Projects programmed in the FSTIP may be delivered in any of the recognized program years of the FSTIP provided Expedited Project Selection Procedures have been adopted in accordance with 23 CFR 450 and the required interagency consultation or coordination is completed and documented. Such revisions do not require an administrative modification or an amendment if the change does not require an air quality conformity determination.

1) DEFINITIONS:

A) Administrative Modifications or administrative actions are minor changes to the FSTIP/FTIP that do not require a conformity determination, a demonstration of fiscal constraint, public review and comment, or federal approval:

1. Revise a project description of individually listed projects without changing the project scope or conflicting with the approved environmental document; 2. Revise the description of grouped project listings, as defined in 23 CFR Part 450.326(h), if it is consistent with the Programming Grouped Project Listings in Air Quality Non-Attainment or Maintenance Areas guidance. 3. Revise the funding amount listed for a project’s or a project phases: a. Additional funding to an individually listed project is limited to the lesser of 40 50 percent of the total project cost or $10 $20 million and programming capacity has to be available in the FSTIP/FTIP prior to programming the modification, and documented in the support materials; b. No limit on adding funds to a grouped project listing. Funding capacity must be available in the FSTIP/FTIP prior to processing programming changes and it must be stated in the supporting documentation. (Note: Updated FTIP financial plans may be requested by Caltrans to validate fiscal constraint if an MPO has processed only administrative modifications for a period of six months or more.) 4. Program preliminary engineering (PE) phase, provided the right-of-way and/or construction phase(s) are already programmed in the current FSTIP/FTIP and additional funding amounts stay within the limits specified in Section 23 above; 5. Cost decreases have no cap, however, the request to reduce the cost must originate from the project sponsor and include an explanation for the decrease; the reduction in cost does not result in deletion of a project or a phase, and the affected project phase is still fully funded; 6. Change the source of funds; 4/16/15 2/20/2020 Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 1

Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Policy

7. Change a project lead agency; 8. Program federal funds for Advance Construction conversion provided that programming capacity is available in the FSTIP/FTIP prior to programming the conversion; 9. Change program year of funds within the 4-year current FSTIP/FTIP, provided Expedited Project Selection Procedures are in place; 10. Split or combine individually listed projects; as long as cost, provided schedule, and scope remain unchanged; 11. Change required information for grouped or lump sum project listings; or, 12. Add or delete projects from grouped or lump sum project listings provided the funding amounts stay within the funding change guidelines above (see Section 2). 13. Program emergency repair projects on the state and local highways caused by as a result of a natural disaster or catastrophic failure from an external cause, and that are not covered by the Emergency Relief Program, provided that these projects are and exempt from air quality conformity requirements; 14. Re-program a project for which FHWA funds were transferred to FTA in the prior FSTIP/FTIP and the FTA had not approved the grant yet cycle but has not received grant approval from the FTA. The project can be programmed in the current FSTIP/FTIP via administrative modification as long as there is no change in the provided original scope or cost remain unchanged. and the project needs to be programmed with Use the type “FTA 5307 (FHWA Transfer Funds)” to program in the FSTIP/FTIP. 15. Program FTA projects from the prior FSTIP/FTIP into the current FSTIP/FTIP via administrative modification as long as there is no change in the provided original scope or cost remain unchanged. Prior year funding must be differentiated from the current year funding by including narrative in the project description (or in “CTIPS MPO Comments” section) stating the year, amount and type of the prior year funds. 16. Make minor changes to the FTA funded grouped project listings. Minor changes include changing the number of transit vehicles purchased by 20% or less and changes to the fuel type of transit vehicles. Kern COG needs to take the change through its must conduct an interagency consultation procedures to confirm that the change in scope is deemed minor.

Administrative modifications can be processed in accordance with these procedures provided that:

1. It does not affect the air quality conformity determination, including timely implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs), and

2. It does not impact financial constraint.

B) Amendments are all other modifications to FSTIP/FTIP that are not Administrative Actions Modifications. Examples include:

1. Introduction of a new project;

2. Scope changes that affect the approved air quality conformity analysis;

3. Funding changes that exceed 40% 50% of individually listed projects or impact the financial constraint of the funding program.

2) PROCEDURES:

A) Administrative Modifications (Administrative Actions) Kern COG’s Executive Director has delegated authority to approve Administrative Modifications to the FSTIP/FTIP. Once approved by the Kern COG Executive Director, the Administrative Modification will be deemed part of the California FSTIP. No State or Federal action will be required. Each Kern COG approved administrative action modification will be forwarded to Caltrans Headquarters, Division of Transportation Programming, FHWA, and FTA. If needed, Kern COG will demonstrate in a subsequent amendment that the net 4/16/15 2/20/2020 Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 2

Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Policy financial change from each modification has been accounted.

B) Amendments Amendments to the FSTIP must be developed in accordance with the provisions of 23 CFR 450.326 and/or 23 CFR 450.216, and approved by the Federal agencies FHWA and/or FTA in accordance with 23 CFR 450.218 and 23 CFR 450.328. Kern COG’s Executive Director has been delegated to approve Amendment Types* 2 and 3 at the Executive Director’s discretion. Each Kern COG approved TIP amendment will be forwarded to Caltrans Headquarters, Division of Transportation Programming for approval on behalf of the Governor. To expedite processing, Kern COG will also forward a copy of the amendment to FHWA and FTA at the same time the amendment is sent to Caltrans. Once approved by Caltrans, on behalf of the Governor, Caltrans will forward the amendment to FHWA and/or FTA for Federal approval. Once approved by FHWA and/or FTA the amendment will be incorporated into California's FSTIP. The FHWA and/or FTA approval will be addressed to Caltrans, with copies to Kern COG.

*Transportation Conformity Types 2 & 3 – amendments not requiring conformity or regional transportation plan revisions.

3) DISPUTE RESOLUTION If a question arises on the interpretation of the definition of an administrative action (modification), Caltrans, Kern COG, FHWA and FTA (the parties) will consult with each other to resolve the question. If after consultation, the parties disagree on the definition of what constitutes an administrative action (modification), the final decision rests with the FTA for transit projects and FHWA for highway projects.

4/16/15 2/20/2020 Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 3

IV.H

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Raquel Pacheco, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV H PROJECT DELIVERY LETTERS – ATP, CMAQ, RSTP

DESCRIPTION:

Presentation of project delivery letters for Active Transportation Program (ATP), Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program, and Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP). 16 projects have not yet submitted for funding authorization representing $10 million in federal/state programming. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

Background The Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) projects in fiscal year 19/20 were originally approved by the Kern COG Board on February 15, 2018. The RSTP and CMAQ projects were then incorporated into the 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Amendment 14 that was federally approved April 26, 2018. The projects were eligible for funding authorization as of April 27, 2018.

Cycle 2 Active Transportation Program (ATP) project in FY 19/20 was approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on January 21, 2016 (MPO component). The project was then incorporated into 2015 FTIP Amendment 15 that was federally approved February 17, 2016.

Cycle 3 Active Transportation Program (ATP) projects in FY 19/20 were approved by the CTC on December 7, 2016 (Statewide component) and March 15, 2017 (MPO component). The projects were then incorporated into 2017 FTIP Amendment 1 that was federally approved February 22, 2017 and 2017 FTIP Amendment 3 that was federally approved April 3, 2017.

Cycle 3 Active Transportation Program (ATP) augmentation projects in FY 19/20 were approved by the CTC on October 18, 2017 (Statewide component). The projects were then incorporated into 2017 FTIP Amendment 11 that was federally approved December 14, 2017.

Cycle 4 Active Transportation Program (ATP) projects in FY 19/20 were approved by the CTC on January 30, 2019 (Statewide component). The projects were then incorporated into 2019 FTIP Amendment 3 that was federally approved April 24, 2019.

Page 2 / Project Delivery Letters

Project Delivery Letters Project delivery letters for fiscal year 19/20 were discussed at the February 5, 2020 Transportation Technical Advisory Committee meeting. As part of “Kern COG’s Project Delivery Policies and Procedures Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview”, local agencies are to submit for funding authorization by the end of January. If an agency does not, then they are required to send a revised submittal schedule to Kern COG. As shown in the summary table below, all letters were received. In total, 16 projects have not yet been submitted for funding authorization representing $10 million in federal/state programming.

Project Delivery

Policy - Review of Projects Taft Arvin

GET Wasco Wasco Delano

Shafter

in FY 19/20 of the Ridgecrest

Tehachapi McFarland Bakersfield Kern COG Kern Kern County

California City

2019 FTIP

No. of projects 4 8 1 3 1 2 13 1 1 1 1 2 1 Projects submitted or approved 0 3 1 3 1 2 9 0 1 0 1 1 1 Letters received 4 5* 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 1 0 Letters needed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Note *: Arvin letter included three projects and a Bakersfield letter includes two projects.

Caltrans Obligational Authority Management Policy Regions can only use their own obligational authority until May 1st, then it is “first-come-first- served” until the obligational authority is gone. Last year, obligational authority was gone by April.

Attachments: Fiscal Year 19/20 project list dated January 24, 2020 Project Delivery Letters

ACTION: Information.

Draft FY 19/20 ATP, CMAQ, RSTP project list Draft FY 19/20

Federal/ Federal/ Project No./ Fiscal State State Date Expect Note Lead PIN Grant No. Description Year PE CON Total to Submit HAVEN DRIVE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE FY 19/20 $92,000 $551,000 $643,000 1 Arvin KER161009 IMPROVEMENTS Arvin KER161010 VARSITY ROAD PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECT FY 19/20 $119,000 $0 $119,000 1 FRANKLIN STREET PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FY 19/20 $50,000 $0 $50,000 1 Arvin KER171002 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (Derby St ‐ FY 19/20 $0 $335,619 $390,619 1 Arvin KER180507 Haven Dr to Schipper Ave) Bakersfield KER161011 DOWNTOWN BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY PROJECT FY 19/20 $0 $1,110,000 $1,367,000 Jan 2020 2a GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION Bakersfield KER180403 Brundage Ln ‐ Washington St to Oswell St FY 19/20 $0 $2,390,921 $2,700,691 Feb 2020 1 F St ‐ 24th St to State Route 204 FY 19/20 $0 $1,523,133 $1,900,000 Jan 2020 2 BAKERSFIELD: MING AVE AT STINE RD; CONSTRUCT LEFT FY 19/20 $0 $265,590 $300,000 Feb 2020 1 Bakersfield KER180506 TURN LANES GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Ming Ave at Allen Rd FY 19/20 $0 $440,463 $497,530 Feb 2020 1 CML‐ Rosedale Hwy ‐ Verdugo Ln to Jet Way FY 19/20 $0 $336,214 $379,775 April 2020 1 Bakersfield KER180507 5109(260) Brimhall Rd ‐ Calloway Dr to Jewetta Ave FY 19/20 $0 $360,950 $407,715 April 2020 1 CML‐ FY 19/20 $0 $376,482 $425,260 CON ‐ done 3 5109(259) Hosking Ave ‐ Stine Rd to S H St GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR KER180403 RSTPL‐ REHABILITATION (Hacienda Blvd ‐ S. Loop Blvd to Eucalyptus FY 19/20 $0 $360,194 $412,100 Jan 2020 2 Cal. City 5399(028) Ave) ATPL‐ FY 19/20 $0 $466,000 $609,000 PE ‐ done 2a Delano KER161004 5227(060) DELANO ATP3 SRTS: SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE ATPL‐ DELANO ATP3 SRTS: INTERSECTION ENHANCEMENT AND FY 19/20 $0 $563,000 $669,000 PE ‐ done 2a Delano KER161005 5227(061) EDUCATION PROJECT GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR STPL‐ REHABILITATION (Albany St ‐ 20th Ave to County Line Rd; FY 19/20 $0 $563,473 $636,477 Jan 2020 2 5227(063) Princeton St ‐ Cecil Ave to 20th Ave; Schuster ‐ S. Lexington St Delano KER180403 to Browning Rd) Golden Empire FTACML‐ METRO BAKERSFIELD PROGRAM FOR FREE TRANSIT FARE FY 19/20 $0 $301,735 $340,829 CON ‐ done 3 Transit KER180503 6285(017) TRIPS DURING UNHEALTHY AIR QUALITY DAYS Project funding authorization request (i.e. E-76, grant): 1. Not submitted; 2. Submitted; or 3. Approved. 2a. Allocation request to CTC. NOTES A. Amendment pending.

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 1 Janaury 24, 2020 Draft FY 19/20 ATP, CMAQ, RSTP project list Draft FY 19/20

Federal/ Federal/ Project No./ Fiscal State State Date Expect Note Lead PIN Grant No. Description Year PE CON Total to Submit STPLNI‐ KCOG KER180401 IN KERN COUNTY: REGIONAL TRAFFIC COUNT PROGRAM FY 19/20 $0 $79,677 $90,000 CON ‐ done 3 6087(064) CMLNI‐ KER180501 IN KERN COUNTY: COMMUTEKERN'S RIDESHARE PROGRAM FY 19/20 $0 $190,960 $215,701 Jan 2020 2 KCOG 6087(065) ATP‐ IN KERN COUNTY: KERN RIVER PARKWAY; CONSTRUCT BIKE FY 19/20 $0 $3,049,000 $3,049,000 Dec 2019 2a Kern Co. KER161001 5950(441) TRAIL WESTERN EXTENSION PHASE I ROSAMOND BOULEVARD PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT FY 19/20 $200,000 $0 $317,000 PE/RW‐done 3 Kern Co. KER161008 (FY 19/20 PE/RW) GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION Kern Co. KER180403 Buttonwillow: Brite Rd ‐ Buttonwillow Dr to Wasco Way FY 19/20 $0 $2,585,000 $4,020,800 Jan 2020 2 Buttonwillow: Mirasol Ave ‐ Brite Rd to SR 58 FY 19/20 $0 $3,260,100 $4,505,200 Jan 2020 2

GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Bakersfield: Fairfax Rd at Zephyr Ln FY 19/20 $0 $561,300 $634,100 Jan 2020 2 Kern Co. KER180507 Rosamond: Rosamond Blvd, 30th St W, 25th St FY 19/20 $0 $1,139,100 $1,286,700 Jan 2020 2 FY 19/20 $0 $539,500 $825,900 Jan 2020 2 Buttonwillow: Brite Rd ‐ Buttonwillow Dr to Wasco Way ROSAMOND: HOLIDAY AVE BETWEEN 65TH ST W AND 60TH FY 19/20 $0 $789,000 $891,300 March 2020 1 Kern Co. KER180509 ST W; SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD CML‐ DELANO: CHRISTINA ST BETWEEN MATHEWS AVE TO CECIL FY 19/20 $0 $934,200 $1,055,300 March 2020 1 Kern Co. KER180510 5950(448) AVE; SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD CML‐ DELANO: MATHEWS AVE BETWEEN TIMMONS AVE TO FY 19/20 $0 $1,328,100 $1,500,200 March 2020 1 Kern Co. KER180511 5950(450) METTLER AVE (.75 MILES); SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD LAMONT: WILSON RD APPROX. 250 FT; SURFACE UNPAVED CML‐ ROAD; HOPE AVE & TATUM ST APPROX. 1,000 FT; SURFACE FY 19/20 $0 $539,500 $748,500 Jan 2020 2 Kern Co. KER180513 5950(449) UNPAVED SHOULDERS DELANO: BRUTTON ST BETWEEN MATHEWS AVE TO CECIL FY 19/20 $0 $801,900 $905,800 March 2020 1 Kern Co. KER180514 AVE; SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD IN BAKERSFIELD: SOUTH CHESTER AVE, MING AVE TO SANDRA DR; PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, ACCESSIBILITY, CROSSING FY 19/20 $283,000 $0 $320,000 PE ‐ done 3 Kern Co. KER191002 IMPROVEMENTS CML‐ IN MCFARLAND: CONSTRUCT PUBLIC TRANSIT ELECTRIC FY 19/20 $0 $421,469 $476,075 April 2020 1 McFarland KER180504 5343(014) VEHICLE CHARGING STATION Project funding authorization request (i.e. E-76, grant): 1. Not submitted; 2. Submitted; or 3. Approved. 2a. Allocation request to CTC. NOTES A. Amendment pending.

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 2 Janaury 24, 2020 Draft FY 19/20 ATP, CMAQ, RSTP project list Draft FY 19/20

Federal/ Federal/ Project No./ Fiscal State State Date Expect Note Lead PIN Grant No. Description Year PE CON Total to Submit

CML‐ RIDGECREST: W. DOLPHIN AVE BETWEEN S. CHINA LAKE BLVD FY 19/20 $0 $700,857 $791,661 Jan 2020 2 Ridgecrest KER180518 5385(064) AND COLLEGE HEIGHTS BLVD; SURFACE UNPAVED STREET STPL‐ SHAFTER: JAMES ST PHASE II: CENTRAL AVE TO SHAFTER AVE; FY 19/20 $0 $526,000 $594,149 Feb 2020 1 Shafter KER190401 5281(029) RECONSTRUCTION STPL‐ GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR KER180403 FY 19/20 $0 $237,071 $270,572 CON ‐ done 3 Taft 5193(042) REHABILITATION (6th St ‐ Main St to Center St) HIP ‐done, GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR FY 19/20 $0 $463,880 $526,477 3, 1 Tehachapi KER180403 REHABILITATION (Tehachapi Blvd, Capital Hills) Feb 2020 IN TEHACHAPI: SRTS SNYDER AVENUE GAP CLOSURE PROJECT ‐ VARIOUS LOCATIONS; INSTALL SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES, FY 19/20 $190,000 $0 $190,000 PE ‐ done 3 Tehachapi KER191001 IMPROVE CROSSWALKS GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR STPL‐ REHABILITATION (7th St ‐ Magnolia Ave west to end of the FY 19/20 $0 $780,162 $881,241 CON ‐ done 3 5287(056) Wasco KER180403 road) Project funding authorization request (i.e. E-76, grant): 1. Not submitted; 2. Submitted; or 3. Approved. 2a. Allocation request to CTC. NOTES A. Amendment pending.

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 3 Janaury 24, 2020 Community development department engineering division 141 plumtree drive Arvin, ca 93203 661-854-2822

January 23, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: KER161009, KER171002, KER180507 Deletion

Kern Council of Governments’ Project Delivery Policy for local projects requires that agencies submit for funding authorization by the end of the month of January. If an agency does not submit by January, then that agency sends a revised submittal schedule to Kern COG by January 17th. Since the City of Arvin does not plan to submit projects KER161009, KER171002, KER180507 by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as City of Arvin’s response:

KER161009 Haven Drive Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Project • Funding program: Active Transportation Program • Total cost of project: $643,000 • Federal share of project: $643,000 • Reason for deletion: City will be unable to complete the project before the expiration date of the PE and CON funds.

KER171002 Franklin Street Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements • Funding program: Active Transportation Program • Total cost of project: $350,000 • Federal share of project: $350,000 • Reason for deletion: City will be unable to complete the project before the expiration date of the PE and CON funds. The City also received funding from another source for a complete reconstruction of Franklin Street beyond the scope of this ATP project, and including all elements of the proposed ATP project.

KER180507 Derby St (Tejon Hwy) between Haven Dr to Schipper Ave; shoulder paving and construct class II bike path • Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality • Total cost of project: $390,619 • Federal share of project: $335,619 • Reason for deletion: City previously vacated PE funds which expired after 2018- 19, and will be unable to complete the construction prior to the expiration of those funds at the end of the current fiscal year.

Should you have any questions, contact Adam Ojeda at 661-854-2822 or [email protected]

Sincerely,

Adam Ojeda; P.E. City Engineer

Community development department engineering division 141 plumtree drive Arvin, ca 93203 661-854-2822

January 23, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: KER161010 Revised Submittal Schedule

Kern Council of Governments’ Project Delivery Policy for local projects requires that agencies submit for funding authorization by the end of the month of January. If an agency does not submit by January, then that agency sends a revised submittal schedule to Kern COG by January 17th. Since the City of Arvin does not plan to submit project KER161010 by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as City of Arvin’s response:

Varsity Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Project

• Funding program: Active Transportation Program • Total cost of project: $119,000 • Federal share of project: $119,000 • Reason for delay: City of Arvin is working with the Kern County Public works department to proceed with this project following recommendation to do so from Caltrans in a corrective action plan for legacy grant funded projects. • Revised submittal date: 4/27/20

Should you have any questions, contact Adam Ojeda at 661-854-2822 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Adam Ojeda; P.E. City Engineer

BAKERSFIELD THE SOUND OF ZJ'IJWfdhWj 13$

January 17, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 191h Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: [KER 180403] Revised Submittal Schedule

Kern Council of Governments' Project Delivery Policy for local projects requires that agencies submit for funding authorization by the end of the month of January. If an agency does not submit by January, then that agency sends a revised submittal schedule to Kern COG by January 17'h. Since City of Bakersfield does not plan to submit project [KER 180403] by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as City of Bakersfield response: Pavement Rehabilitation on Brundage Lane from Washington Street to Oswell Street • Funding program: Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) • Total cost of project: $2,700,691.00 • Federal share of project: $2,390,921 .00 • Reason for delay: Staff is currently working with Caltrans for completion of the Right of Way Certifications; however, due to longer than anticipated review times those certifications will not be completed before January 30, 2020, thus delaying the City's ability to submit the Request for Authorization {RFA) package. • Revised submittal date: February 29, 2020 Should you have any questions, please contact me, Navdip Grewal at {661 )326-3361 or at [email protected]

Very truly yours, Nick Fidler Public Works Director g By: @ LL Na~wal Civil Engineer IV - Design Engineering

Public Works Department 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 661-326-3724 FAX: 661-852-2120 BAKERSFIELD THE SOUND OF ZJ'blt'(f)J,Wf ~

January 17, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 140 1 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: [KER 180506] Revised Submittal Schedule

Kern Council of Governments' Project Delivery Policy for local projects requires that agencies submit for funding authorization by the end of the month of January. If an agency does not submit by

January, then that agency sends a revised submittal schedule to Kern COG by January 171h. Since City of Bakersfield does not plan to submit project [KER 180506] by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as City of Bakersfield response: Ming A venue at Stine Road; construct dual left turn lanes • Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) • Total cost of project: $300,000.00 • Federal share of project: $265,590.00 • Reason for delay: Staff is currently working with Caltrans for completion of the Right of Way Certifications; however, due to longer than anticipated review times those certifications will not be completed before January 30, 2020, thus delaying the City's ability to submit the Request for Authorization (RFA) package. • Revised submittal date: February 29, 2020 Should you have any questions, please contact me, Navdip Grewal at (661 )326-3361 or at [email protected]

Very truly yours, Nick Fidler Public Works Director 'y By: 4-t!U NdvdipGrewal -....__ Civil Engineer IV - Design Engineering

Public Works Department 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 661-326-3724 FAX: 661-852-2120 BAKERSFIELD THE SOUND OF &~WJ fJe/te,

January 17, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 191h Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: [KER 180507) Revised Submittal Schedule

Kern Council of Governments' Project Delivery Policy for local projects requires that agencies submit for funding authorization by the end of the month of January. If an agency does not submit by January, then that agency sends a revised submittal schedule to Kern COG by January 17th. Since City of Bakersfield does not plan to submit project [KER 180507] by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as City of Bakersfield response: Install a traffic signal and lighting system at the intersection of Ming A venue and Allen Road • Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) • Total cost of project: $497,530.00 • Federal share of project: $440,463.00 • Reason for delay: Staff is currently working with Caltrans for completion of the Right of Way Certifications; however, due to longer than anticipated review times those certifications will not be completed before January 30, 2020, thus delaying the City's ability to submit the Request for Authorization (RFA) package. • Revised submittal date: February 29, 2020 Should you have any questions, please contact me, Navdip Grewal at (661 )326-3361 or at [email protected]

Very truly yours, Nick Fidler Public Works Director

By: NavJf/Bd/l{ Civil Engineer IV - Design Engineering

Public Works Department 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 661-326-3724 FAX:661-852-2120 BAKERSFIELD~-----·------._ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NICK FIDLER• DIRECTOR • CITY ENGINEER

January 17, 2020

Mr. Abron Hakimi Kem Council of Governments JAN 17 202Q 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: KERI 80507 Revised Submittal Schedule

Kem Council of Governments' Project Delivery Policy for local projects requires that agencies submit for funding authorization by the end of the month of January. If an agency does not submit by January, then that agency sends a revised submittal schedule to Kem COG by January 17th. Since City of Bakersfield does not plan to submit project KER180507 (Traffic Signal Interconnect on Rosedale Highway between Verdugo Lane and Jet Way; and Brimhall Road between Jewetta Avenue and Calloway Drive) by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as City of Bakersfield's response:

Traffic Signal Coordination (Interconnect) a) Rosedale Highway between Verdugo Lane and Jet Way ($379,775) b) Brimhall Road between Jewetta Avenue and Calloway Drive ($407,715) • Funding program: CMAQ CML 5109 (260) • Total cost of project: $787,490 • Federal share of project: Rosedale Hwy ($336,214) + Brimhall Rd. ($360,950) = Total ($697,164 • Reason for delay: The City of Bakersfield has submitted the Preliminary Environmental Studies (PES) to Caltrans on October 23, 2019. Approval of PES is pre-requisite to move forward with submitting the Right of Way Certification

1600 Truxtun A venue w,vw.bakerslic!doity.us Bakersfield • California• 93301 (661) 326- 3724 Fax (661) 852-2120 and the Request for Authorization (Construction). The City has followed up with Cal trans regarding the status of the PES approval due to the delayed response. • Revised submittal date: April 10, 2019

Should you have any questions, contact Joe Catalan at (661) 326-3597 or [email protected].

Very truly yours, NICK FIDLER Public Works Director

By: /2' ~ Ryan Starbuck Traffic Engineer c: Nick Fidler, Stuart Patteson, Joe Catalan, Rosanne Padley, Raquel Pacheco, Reading File CRAIG M. POPE, P.E., DIRECTOR 2700 “M” STREET, Suite 400 ADMINISTRATION & HUMAN RESOURCES BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301-2370 FINANCE & ENGINEERING Phone: (661) 862-8850 BUILDING & CODES FAX: (661) 862-8851 OPERATIONS Toll Free: (800) 552-5376 Option 5 TTY Relay: (800) 735-2929

January 17, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: [KER180509] Revised submittal Schedule

Kern County Public Works Department does not plan to submit project [KER180509] by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as Kern County Public Works Department’s response:

The project is to surface unpaved road on Holiday Avenue between 65th St W and 60th St W.  Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality  Total cost of project: $891,300  Federal share of project: $789,000  Reason for delay: Right of way certification has not been approved by Caltrans District 9. Delay of certification approval due to the requirements to provide signed agreements from property owners and the requirements to provide utility relocation plans completed by utility companies. We are working diligently with Caltrans District 9 to obtain the right of way certification.  Revised submittal date: March 15, 2020

Should you have any questions, please contact Darren Qu Phone: 661-862-5252 Email: [email protected]

Sincerely,

Darren Qu, PE Engineering Manager Finance and Engineering Division Kern County Public Works Department CRAIG M. POPE, P.E., DIRECTOR 2700 “M” STREET, Suite 400 ADMINISTRATION & HUMAN RESOURCES BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301-2370 FINANCE & ENGINEERING Phone: (661) 862-8850 BUILDING & CODES FAX: (661) 862-8851 OPERATIONS Toll Free: (800) 552-5376 Option 5 TTY Relay: (800) 735-2929

January 17, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: [KER180510] Revised submittal Schedule

Kern County Public Works Department does not plan to submit project [KER180510] by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as Kern County Public Works Department’s response:

The project is to surface unpaved road on Christina Street between Mathews avenue and Cecil Ave.  Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality  Total cost of project: $1,055,300  Federal share of project: $934,200  Reason for delay: Right of way certification has not been approved by Caltrans District 6. Delay of certification approval due to the requirements to provide signed agreements from property owners and the requirements to provide utility relocation plans completed by utility companies.  Revised submittal date: March 15, 2020

Should you have any questions, please contact Darren Qu Phone: 661-862-5252 Email: [email protected]

Sincerely,

January 17, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: [KER180511] Revised submittal Schedule

Kern County Public Works Department does not plan to submit project [KER180511] by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as Kern County Public Works Department’s response:

The project is to surface unpaved road on Mathews Avenue between Timmons Ave and Mettler Ave.  Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality  Total cost of project: $1,500,200  Federal share of project: $1,328,100  Reason for delay: Right of way certification has not been approved by Caltrans District 6. Delay of certification approval due to the requirements to provide signed agreements from property owners and the requirements to provide utility relocation plans completed by utility companies.  Revised submittal date: March 15, 2020

Should you have any questions, please contact Darren Qu Phone: 661-862-5252 Email: [email protected]

Sincerely,

January 17, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: [KER180514] Revised submittal Schedule

Kern County Public Works Department does not plan to submit project [KER180514] by the end of January for funding authorization, the following is provided as Kern County Public Works Department’s response:

The project is to surface unpaved road on Brutton St between Mathews Ave and Cecil Ave  Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality  Total cost of project: $905,800  Federal share of project: $801,900  Reason for delay: Right of way certification has not been approved by Caltrans District 6. Delay of certification approval due to the requirements to provide signed agreements from property owners and the requirements to provide utility relocation plans completed by utility companies.  Revised submittal date: March 15, 2020

Should you have any questions, please contact Darren Qu Phone: 661-862-5252 Email: [email protected]

Sincerely,

Darren Qu, PE Engineering Manager Finance and Engineering Division Kern County Public Works Department ~ 401 W. Kem Avenue McFarland, CA 93250 THE McFCITY OF~· d 661-792-3091 Office TRADITION • UNITY • EXCELLENCE 661-792-3093 Fax

January 21, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 140119th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: KER180504 Revised Submittal Schedule

CML-5343(014) Construct Public Transit Electric Vehicle Charging Station

• Funding program: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality • Total cost of project: $476,075 • Federal share of project: $421,469 • Reason for delay: Caltrans Local Assistance is requesting further Native American consultation, as part of the Archeological Survey Report, in order to approved the NEPA environmental clearance of the project. Our subconsultant has initiated formal Native American consultation, and it could take a few weeks to get a response. • Revised submittal date: 04/30/2020

Should you have any questions, contact Juan M. Pantoja at (661) 558-4641 or [email protected].

Sincerely, ~~~ Mario Gonzales Public Works Director ~ r c. Ty o F--1 ,SMAFrlER

336 Pacific Avenue, Shafter, California, 93263

January 21, 2020

Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301

Re: KER190401 Revised Submittal Schedule

James Street Phase II : Central Ave. to Shafter Ave. Reconstruction • Funding program: Regional Surface Transportation Program • Total cost of project: $594,149.00 • Federal share of project: $526,000.00 • Reason for delay: Finalizing Right-of-Way Certification & Holiday Season • Revised submittal date: 2/17/2020

Should you have any questions, contact Alex Gonzalez at 661-746-5002 or email [email protected].

Sincerely,

Mic~ ~ Public Works Director CITY Of Build Up. Ploy Up. Work Up. Explore Up. Live Up. ~ TE!:~,S~/~~1 January 8, 2020 RIICEIVE -~ Mr. Ahron Hakimi Kem Council of Governments JAN 16 2020 ~ I 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 KERN COUNCIL Bakersfield, CA 93301 OF GOVERNMENTS

Re: KERI 80403 Revised Submittal Schedule

Kem Council of Governments' Project Delivery Policy for local projects requires that agencies submit for funding authorization by the end of the month of January. If an agency does not submit by January, then that agency sends a revised submittal schedule to Kem COG by January 15th. Since the City of Tehachapi does not plan to submit project KERI 80403 by the end of January for construction funding authorization, the following is provided as the City of Tehachapi response: Tehachapi Blvd from 150' east of westbound Highway 58 off ramp to Monolith St & Tehachapi Blvd at Robinson St & Capital Hills Parkway from Magellan Dr to Challenger Dr: resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

• Funding program: FTIP/FSTIP • Total cost of project: $378,268 • Federal share of project: $334,880 • Reason for delay: Construction phase is programmed for 19/20 fiscal year. PE and environment are underway and near completion. We expect to submit our RFA for construction within the 19/20 fiscal year. • Revised submittal date: RF A for Construction, February 2020.

Should you have any questions, contact Associate Engineer Andrew Norton at ( 661) 822- 2200 ext. 131 or anorton@tehachapicityhallcom.

Sincerely,

Associate Engineer

115 South Robinson Street I Tehachapi, California 93561-1722 (661) 822-2200 I Fax: (661) 822-8559 www.tehachapicityhall.com IV.I

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Raquel Pacheco, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV I PROJECT ACCOUNTABILITY TEAM REPORT

DESCRIPTION:

January 7, 2020 Project Accountability Team meeting highlights and latest updates. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

The Project Accountability Team meetings are held quarterly as needed to discuss project implementation issues and to develop solutions. Participants review project status information for projects in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP).

Highlights from January 7, 2020 Project Accountability Team meeting and latest updates:

1. Transportation Development Act Article 3 and Active Transportation Program will now be managed by Mr. Bob Snoddy.

2. California Transportation Commission (CTC) is developing the Active Transportation Program Cycle 5 guidelines and the tentative deadline for applications is June 2020.

3. Kern COG staff had reported January 7th that Hot Spot Assessments could not be processed due to the “Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program.” Update since January 7th: FHWA is now willing to issue Hot Spot Assessment concurrences. If projects have been programmed and do not require any changes, then FHWA will continue issuing conformity approvals for project-level.

4. Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) funds – Please make sure to separate the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds from the HIP funds in the request for authorization forms.

5. Score Card – 9% of projects have approved funding authorization; 57% is awaiting funding authorization; 34% has not been submitted for funding authorization

Attachments: January 7, 2020 Project Accountability Team meeting notes January 24, 2020 FY 19/20 Score Card January 24, 2020 FY 19/20, 20/21 project list

ACTION: Information.

Project Accountability Team Meeting

Tuesday, January 7, 2020 Meeting held at Kern Council of Governments

Attendees: Adam Ojeda, Arvin Bob Snoddy, Kern COG Christine Viterelli, Arvin (via phone) Raquel Pacheco, Kern COG Navdip Grewal, Bakersfield Rochelle Invina, Kern COG Ryan Starbuck, Bakersfield Susanne Campbell, Kern COG Ed Galero, Delano Yolanda Alcantar, Kern County Bard Lower, Ridgecrest (via phone) Lorena Mendibles, Caltrans (via phone) Kameron Arnold, Wasco Ahron Hakimi, Kern COG

DRAFT Notes 1. Introductions confirmed attendees.

2. Transportation Development Act Article 3 – Mr. Peter Smith has retired and Mr. Bob Snoddy now manages this program. Attendees from Arvin, Bakersfield, Kern County, and Wasco provided updates. Updates to the project list presented at the meeting are now part of a separate TTAC staff report.

Updates since the January meeting: Mr. Snoddy emailed agencies that did not attend the meeting to request project updates.

3. Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 2, 3, & 4 Delivery – Mr. Peter Smith has retired and Mr. Bob Snoddy now manages this program. Ms. Pacheco noted for projects programmed in FY 19/20, the next opportunity to submit allocation vote to Caltrans was January 27, 2020 for the March California Transportation Commission (CTC) meeting.

Mr. Ojeda reported that Arvin has notified Caltrans Local Assistance of the decision to not continue with the delivery of two ATP projects - Franklin Street and Haven Drive. Kern COG staff to research what happens to the funding and ask if the funding can be used for cost overruns.

Update since the January meeting: The Arvin project programming goes back to the state.

4. ATP Cycle 5 – CTC has been developing the ATP Cycle 5 guidelines and the tentative deadline for applications is June 2020.

5. Draft RSTP Program of Projects – Ms. Pacheco presented the draft program.

6. Draft CMAQ Program of Projects and Draft Contingency Project Policy/List – Ms. Pacheco presented the draft programs.

Delivery of CMAQ projects may be impacted by the “Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program.” Reviewing agencies may not be able to respond to Hot Spot Assessments with “not a project of air quality concern” concurrence. Kern COG staff will continue to monitor this matter and report to project delivery staff. Mr. Hakimi requested Ms. Mendibles look into the matter.

Update since the January meeting: FHWA is now willing to issue Hot Spot Assessment concurrences. If projects have been programmed and do not require any changes, then FHWA will continue issuing conformity approvals for project-level.

Page 2 / January 2020 notes

7. Roundtable presentations – Each agency, represented, gave a project update only if new information was available for 2019-2020 projects. See updates in the project list attached.

a. Project delivery letters due January 17

b. Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) funds – Please make sure to separate the RSTP funds from the HIP funds in the request for authorization forms.

c. CMAQ Rescission Update – No CMAQ funding was lost due to the rescission because the rescission has been repealed. Kern COG does not have projects to use the loan that has now been repaid. Kern COG will research options for programming the funding in the FTIP.

d. Contingency projects programmed in FY 20/21 need to have an approved construction phase E-76 by January 2020. In February, Kern COG staff will request the Kern COG Board approve the new CMAQ Program of Projects. By March, the draft FTIP Amendment to incorporate the new CMAQ Program of Projects will be circulated and include the deletion of current FY 20/21 CMAQ Contingency projects.

e. Caltrans Local Assistance Workshop topics – Attendees requested Caltrans discuss Right of Way process streamlining and Hot Spot Assessment process. Kern COG will coordinate with Caltrans to prepare the next workshop.

f. Project managers can do an internet search for “Caltrans Local Assistance” and scroll down to “E-76 waiting list” report to review the status of their request for authorization. The report is also available at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/reports/e-76-waiting

8. Announcements - none

9. Conclude Meeting – next meeting tentatively April 2020

January 24, 2020

TO: TTAC Members and Project Managers

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Raquel Pacheco, Regional Planner

RE: Project Delivery Score Card

Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Federal/State $ in FY 19/20 No. of Preliminary % of FY 2019-20 Projects Engineering Construction funding ATP 10 $1,031,000 $5,739,000 CMAQ 18 $0 $10,362,939 RSTP/HIP 11 $0 $12,769,611 Totals 39 $1,031,000 $28,871,550 100%

1. Not No. of Preliminary % of Submitted Projects Engineering Construction funding ATP 3 $261,000 $551,000 CMAQ 10 $0 $6,013,505 RSTP/HIP 3 $0 $3,251,801 Total 16 $261,000 $9,816,306 34%

No. of Preliminary % of 2. Submitted Projects Engineering Construction funding ATP 3 $0 $5,188,000 CMAQ 6 $0 $3,671,217 RSTP/HIP 5 $0 $8,341,900 Total 14 $0 $17,201,117 57%

3. State/Federal No. of Preliminary % of Approvals Projects Engineering Construction funding ATP 4 $770,000 $0 CMAQ 2 $0 $678,217 RSTP/HIP 3 $0 $1,175,910 Total 9 $770,000 $1,854,127 9%

Legend: ATP – Active Transportation Program; CMAQ – Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program; RSTP/HIP – Regional Surface Transportation Program/Highway Infrastructure Program

Draft FY 19/20, 20/21 ATP, CMAQ, RSTP project list Draft FY 19/20, 20/21

Federal/ Federal/ Project No./ Fiscal State State Date Expect Note Lead PIN Grant No. Description Year PE CON Total to Submit HAVEN DRIVE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE FY 19/20 $92,000 $551,000 $643,000 1 Arvin KER161009 IMPROVEMENTS FY 19/20 $119,000 $0 $119,000 1 Arvin KER161010 VARSITY ROAD PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECT FY 20/21 $714,000 $714,000 1 FRANKLIN STREET PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FY 19/20 $50,000 $0 $50,000 1 Arvin KER171002 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FY 20/21 $300,000 $300,000 1 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (Derby St ‐ FY 19/20 $0 $335,619 $390,619 1 Arvin KER180507 Haven Dr to Schipper Ave) Bakersfield KER161011 DOWNTOWN BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY PROJECT FY 19/20 $0 $1,110,000 $1,367,000 Jan 2020 2a GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION Bakersfield KER180403 Brundage Ln ‐ Washington St to Oswell St FY 19/20 $0 $2,390,921 $2,700,691 Feb 2020 1 F St ‐ 24th St to State Route 204 FY 19/20 $0 $1,523,133 $1,900,000 Jan 2020 2 BAKERSFIELD: MING AVE AT STINE RD; CONSTRUCT LEFT FY 19/20 $0 $265,590 $300,000 Feb 2020 1 Bakersfield KER180506 TURN LANES GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Ming Ave at Allen Rd FY 19/20 $0 $440,463 $497,530 Feb 2020 1 CML‐ Rosedale Hwy ‐ Verdugo Ln to Jet Way FY 19/20 $0 $336,214 $379,775 April 2020 1 Bakersfield KER180507 5109(260) Brimhall Rd ‐ Calloway Dr to Jewetta Ave FY 19/20 $0 $360,950 $407,715 April 2020 1 Hosking Ave ‐ Stine Rd to S H St FY 19/20 $0 $376,482 $425,260 CON ‐ done 3 CML‐ Brundage Ln ‐ H St to P St FY 20/21 $0 $136,969 $154,715 CON ‐ done 3 5109(259) Akers Rd ‐ Panama Ln to Hosking Ave FY 20/21 $0 $343,080 $387,530 CON ‐ done 3 GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR Cal. City KER180403 RSTPL‐ REHABILITATION (Hacienda Blvd ‐ S. Loop Blvd to Eucalyptus FY 19/20 $0 $360,194 $412,100 Jan 2020 2 5399(028) Ave) ATPL‐ FY 19/20 $71,000 $466,000 $609,000 PE ‐ done 3, 2a Delano KER161004 5227(060) DELANO ATP3 SRTS: SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE ATPL‐ DELANO ATP3 SRTS: INTERSECTION ENHANCEMENT AND FY 19/20 $26,000 $563,000 $669,000 PE ‐ done 3, 2a Delano KER161005 5227(061) EDUCATION PROJECT GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION (Albany St ‐ 20th Ave to County Line Rd; Delano KER180403 FY 19/20 $0 $563,473 $636,477 Jan 2020 2 STPL‐ Princeton St ‐ Cecil Ave to 20th Ave; Schuster ‐ S. Lexington St 5227(063) to Browning Rd) Project funding authorization request (E-76 or grant): 1. Not submitted; 2. Submitted; or 3. Approved. 2a. Allocation request to CTC. NOTES A. Amendment pending; 4. Contingency projects that must have authorization approved by January 2020.

January 24, 2020 Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 1 Draft FY 19/20, 20/21 ATP, CMAQ, RSTP project list Draft FY 19/20, 20/21

Federal/ Federal/ Project No./ Fiscal State State Date Expect Note Lead PIN Grant No. Description Year PE CON Total to Submit Golden Empire KER180503 FTACML‐ METRO BAKERSFIELD PROGRAM FOR FREE TRANSIT FARE FY 19/20 $0 $301,735 $340,829 CON ‐ done 3 Transit 6285(017) TRIPS DURING UNHEALTHY AIR QUALITY DAYS STPLNI‐ KCOG KER180401 IN KERN COUNTY: REGIONAL TRAFFIC COUNT PROGRAM FY 19/20 $0 $79,677 $90,000 CON ‐ done 3 6087(064) CMLNI‐ KCOG KER180501 IN KERN COUNTY: COMMUTEKERN'S RIDESHARE PROGRAM FY 19/20 $0 $190,960 $215,701 Jan 2020 2 6087(065) ATP‐ IN KERN COUNTY: KERN RIVER PARKWAY; CONSTRUCT BIKE FY 19/20 $0 $3,049,000 $3,049,000 Dec 2019 2a Kern Co. KER161001 5950(441) TRAIL WESTERN EXTENSION PHASE I FY 19/20 $200,000 $0 $317,000 PE/RW‐done 3 Kern Co. KER161008 ROSAMOND BOULEVARD PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT FY 20/21 $0 $680,000 $680,000 1 Kern Co. KER171001 VIRGINIA STREET PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT FY 20/21 $0 $1,731,000 $1,956,000 1 GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION Kern Co. KER180403 Buttonwillow: Brite Rd ‐ Buttonwillow Dr to Wasco Way FY 19/20 $0 $2,585,000 $4,020,800 Jan 2020 2 Buttonwillow: Mirasol Ave ‐ Brite Rd to SR 58 FY 19/20 $0 $3,260,100 $4,505,200 Jan 2020 2

GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Bakersfield: Fairfax Rd at Zephyr Ln FY 19/20 $0 $561,300 $634,100 Jan 2020 2 Rosamond: Rosamond Blvd, 30th St W, 25th St FY 19/20 $0 $1,139,100 $1,286,700 Jan 2020 2 FY 19/20 $0 $539,500 $825,900 Jan 2020 2 Kern Co. KER180507 Buttonwillow: Brite Rd ‐ Buttonwillow Dr to Wasco Way CML‐ FY 20/21 $0 $1,021,500 $1,153,900 CON ‐ done 3 5950(465) Bakersfield: Kratzmeyer Rd ‐ Enos Ln to Nord Ave Buttonwillow: Mirasol Ave ‐ Brite Rd to SR 58 FY 20/21 $0 $666,500 $752,900 4 Bakersfield: Meacham Rd ‐ Heath Rd to 200 ft East of Jenkins FY 20/21 $0 $1,715,700 $1,938,100 4 Rd ROSAMOND: HOLIDAY AVE BETWEEN 65TH ST W AND 60TH FY 19/20 $0 $789,000 $891,300 March 2020 1 Kern Co. KER180509 ST W; SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD CML‐ DELANO: CHRISTINA ST BETWEEN MATHEWS AVE TO CECIL FY 19/20 $0 $934,200 $1,055,300 March 2020 1 Kern Co. KER180510 5950(448) AVE; SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD CML‐ DELANO: MATHEWS AVE BETWEEN TIMMONS AVE TO FY 19/20 $0 $1,328,100 $1,500,200 March 2020 1 Kern Co. KER180511 5950(450) METTLER AVE (.75 MILES); SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD Project funding authorization request (E-76 or grant): 1. Not submitted; 2. Submitted; or 3. Approved. 2a. Allocation request to CTC. NOTES A. Amendment pending; 4. Contingency projects that must have authorization approved by January 2020.

January 24, 2020 Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 2 Draft FY 19/20, 20/21 ATP, CMAQ, RSTP project list Draft FY 19/20, 20/21

Federal/ Federal/ Project No./ Fiscal State State Date Expect Note Lead PIN Grant No. Description Year PE CON Total to Submit LAMONT: WILSON RD APPROX. 250 FT; SURFACE UNPAVED CML‐ ROAD; HOPE AVE & TATUM ST APPROX. 1,000 FT; SURFACE FY 19/20 $0 $539,500 $748,500 Jan 2020 2 Kern Co. KER180513 5950(449) UNPAVED SHOULDERS DELANO: BRUTTON ST BETWEEN MATHEWS AVE TO CECIL March 2020 Kern Co. KER180514 AVE; SURFACE UNPAVED ROAD FY 19/20 $0 $801,900 $905,800 1 IN BAKERSFIELD: SOUTH CHESTER AVE, MING AVE TO SANDRA FY 19/20 $283,000 $0 $320,000 PE ‐ done 3 Kern Co. KER191002 DR; PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, ACCESSIBILITY, CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS FY 20/21 $102,000 $0 $102,000 RW ‐ done 3 IN LAKE ISABELLA: WALK ISABELLA ‐ LAKE ISABELLA BLVD AND Kern Co. KER191003 ERSKINE CREEK RD: PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY AND FY 20/21 $854,000 $0 $854,000 1 ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS CML‐ IN MCFARLAND: CONSTRUCT PUBLIC TRANSIT ELECTRIC FY 19/20 $0 $421,469 $476,075 April 2020 1 McFarland KER180504 5343(014) VEHICLE CHARGING STATION

RIDGECREST: W. DOLPHIN AVE BETWEEN S. CHINA LAKE BLVD FY 19/20 $0 $700,857 $791,661 Jan 2020 2 Ridgecrest KER180518 AND COLLEGE HEIGHTS BLVD; SURFACE UNPAVED STREET RIDGECREST: NORTH HALF OF TAMARISK AVE FROM INYO ST CML‐ AND 100 FT WEST OF CAPEHART CT; SURFACE UNPAVED FY 20/21 $0 $168,816 $190,688 CON ‐ done 3 Ridgecrest KER180519 5385(064) STREET STPL‐ SHAFTER: JAMES ST PHASE II: CENTRAL AVE TO SHAFTER AVE; FY 19/20 $0 $526,000 $594,149 Feb 2020 1 Shafter KER190401 5281(029) RECONSTRUCTION STPL‐ GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR Taft KER180403 FY 19/20 $0 $237,071 $270,572 CON ‐ done 3 5193(042) REHABILITATION (6th St ‐ Main St to Center St) HIP ‐done, Tehachapi KER180403 GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR FY 19/20 $0 $463,880 $526,477 3, 1 REHABILITATION (Tehachapi Blvd, Capital Hills) Feb 2020 IN TEHACHAPI: SRTS SNYDER AVENUE GAP CLOSURE PROJECT ‐ FY 19/20 $190,000 $0 $190,000 PE ‐ done 3 Tehachapi KER191001 VARIOUS LOCATIONS; INSTALL SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES, IMPROVE CROSSWALKS FY 20/21 $0 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 1 GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR STPL‐ REHABILITATION (7th St ‐ Magnolia Ave west to end of the FY 19/20 $0 $780,162 $881,241 CON ‐ done 3 5287(056) Wasco KER180403 road) IN WASCO: PURCHASE ONE REPLACEMENT CNG SANITATION FY 20/21 $0 $309,855 $350,000 4 Wasco KER180517 TRUCK Project funding authorization request (E-76 or grant): 1. Not submitted; 2. Submitted; or 3. Approved. 2a. Allocation request to CTC. NOTES A. Amendment pending; 4. Contingency projects that must have authorization approved by January 2020.

January 24, 2020 Prepared by Kern Council of Governments 3 IV.J

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Raquel Pacheco, Regional Planner Rochelle Invina, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV.J CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) – FINAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS

DESCRIPTION:

The Final CMAQ Program of Projects includes $22.3 million for member agency projects. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

Timeline The next task in the CMAQ call for projects process is to request approval of the final program of projects as shown below:

CMAQ Call for Projects Timeline

Date Task December 2019 Circulate Draft Program of Projects to TTAC January 2020 Present Draft Program of Projects to TPPC February 2020 Approve Final Program of Projects and introduction into FTIP

Kern COG staff and TTAC members conducted a thorough peer review process. The draft Program of Projects were circulated to the TTAC via email in December 26, 2019 and presented to TPPC in January 16, 2020. No changes have been made to the Draft CMAQ Program of Projects. The approved CMAQ Program of Projects will then be incorporated into an amendment to the 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program to allow projects to advance to fiscal year 19/20.

Final CMAQ Program of Projects CMAQ Program of Projects includes “Summary of Programming by Category” that provides an overview of available funding for each programming year and the total amount of proposed programming that was identified for each CMAQ category (see Attachment). Target amounts by category were approved by the Kern COG Board at their March 2019 meeting. Kern COG staff proposes the Final CMAQ Program of Projects for the following reasons:

• Distribution of at least 20% of funding to projects that meet $45/lb. cost effectiveness threshold; • Inclusion of signal synchronization and multi-use path projects to meet Kern region’s Sustainable Communities Strategy goals;

Page 2 Final CMAQ February 2020

• Inclusion of shoulder improvement projects that include the construction of bike lanes; • Inclusion of surface unpaved street projects and roundabout projects that leverage local funding beyond the required local match requirement throughout Kern County; • Meets financial constraint requirements by fiscal year; and • 20 projects in total.

Kern COG staff is selecting additional contingency projects for programming in two outer years. Details regarding the implementation of this selection will follow in a separate staff report.

Kern COG recommends approval of the CMAQ Program of Projects. The TTAC reviewed this item on February 5, 2020 and recommends approval of the Final CMAQ Program of Projects.

Attachment: Final 2019 CMAQ Program of Projects – Summary of Programming by Category

ACTION: Approve the Final CMAQ Program of Projects. VOICE VOTE

FINAL 2019 CMAQ Program of Projects ‐ Summary of Programming by Category

2020‐21 2021‐22 TOTALS TOTAL CMAQ AVAILABLE $11,375,000 $11,371,000 $22,746,000

REGIONAL $211,602 $222,148 $433,750 BALANCE OF TOTAL CMAQ AVAILABLE $11,188,276 $11,169,466 $22,357,742

CATEGORY 1 ‐ TRANSIT ‐ 20% OF TOTAL CMAQ $2,237,655 $2,233,893 $4,471,548 PROJECT SUBMITTALS $293,104 $556,457 $849,561 CMAQ PROJECTS TO FUND $0 $0 $0 BALANCE OF CATEGORY 1 ‐ TRANSIT $2,237,655 $2,233,893 $4,471,548

CATEGORY 2 ‐ ALTERNATIVE FUEL ‐ 15% OF TOTAL CMAQ $1,678,241 $1,675,420 $3,353,661 PROJECT SUBMITTALS $0 $0 $0 CMAQ PROJECTS TO FUND $0 $0 $0 BALANCE OF CATEGORY 2 ‐ ALTERNATIVE FUEL $1,678,241 $1,675,420 $3,353,661

CATEGORY 3 ‐ TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ‐ 20% OF TOTAL CMAQ $2,237,655 $2,233,893 $4,471,548 PROJECT SUBMITTALS $4,431,883 $1,239,420 $5,671,303 CMAQ PROJECTS TO FUND $4,431,883 $1,239,420 $5,671,303 BALANCE OF CATEGORY 3 ‐ TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ($2,194,228) $994,473 ($1,199,755)

CATEGORY 4 ‐ DISCRETIONARY ‐ 45% OF TOTAL CMAQ $5,034,724 $5,026,260 $10,060,984 PROJECT SUBMITTALS $17,975,353 $33,521,985 $51,497,338 CMAQ PROJECTS TO FUND $6,482,405 $9,755,388 $16,237,793 BALANCE OF CATEGORY 4 ‐ DISCRETIONARY ($1,447,681) ($4,729,128) ($6,176,809)

TOTAL PROJECTS SUBMITTED $22,911,942 $35,540,010 $58,451,952 PROJECTS TO FUND $11,125,890 $11,216,956 $22,342,846 CMAQ PROGRAM BALANCE $249,110 $154,044 $403,154 DUE TO ROUNDING THE TOTAL MAY BE OFF BY $1.

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments December 26, 2019 Category 0 - Regional CMAQ Program of Projects - Ranked by Category and Total Points

2020-21 2021-22 Not Recommended Lead Points Project CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL

Kern COG 50 Kern County: CommuteKern Total $0 $0 $222,148 $28,782 $0 $0 Rideshare Program

Kern COG 50 Kern County: CommuteKern Total $211,602 $27,416 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rideshare Program

Total $211,602 $27,416 $222,148 $28,782 $0 $0

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments December 26, 2019 Page 1 of 5 Category 1 - Transit CMAQ Program of Projects - Ranked by Category and Total Points

2020-21 2021-22 Not Recommended Lead Points Project CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL

Ridgecrest 17 Ridgecrest: City corporation yard; Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,883 $30,572 Installl electric vehicle charging station and solar photovoltaic system (SGR $42,475)

Arvin 0 Arvin Dial-A-Ride: Purchase Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,678 $37,402 Replacement Electric Cut-A-Way Vehicle with Charging Station and Install Infrastructure NOT ELIGIBLE

Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $849,561 $67,974

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments December 26, 2019 Page 2 of 5 Category 3 - Traffic Operations CMAQ Program of Projects - Ranked by Category and Total Points

2020-21 2021-22 Not Recommended Lead Points Project CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL

Bakersfield 52 Bakersfield: Signal Coordination Part 2 Total $0 $0 $1,239,420 $160,580 $0 $0

Bakersfield 45 Bakersfield: Signal Coordination Part 1 Total $1,593,540 $206,460 $0 $0 $0 $0

Bakersfield 42 Bakersfield: New Stine Rd between Total $531,180 $68,820 $0 $0 $0 $0 Panama Lane and Mohawk St & Calloway Dr between White Ln and Brimhall Rd; install traffic signals communication Kern Co. 42 Kern County (Bakersfield): Intersection Total $594,703 $77,051 $0 $0 $0 $0 of Flower Street and Virginia Street; Construct a traffic signal and ancillary facilities

Bakersfield 38 Bakersfield: Wible Rd at McKee Rd; Total $586,319 $75,964 $0 $0 $0 $0 traffic signal & Wible Rd between McKee Rd and Hosking Ave; synchronization

Bakersfield 37 Bakersfield: McKee Rd at Ashe Rd; Total $287,722 $37,278 $0 $0 $0 $0 install traffic signal

Kern Co. 32 Kern County (Oildale): Intersection of Total $838,419 $108,627 $0 $0 $0 $0 Manor St and Day Ave; Construct a traffic signal and ancillary facilities

Total $4,431,883 $574,200 $1,239,420 $160,580 $0 $0

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments December 26, 2019 Page 3 of 5 Category 4 - Discretionary CMAQ Program of Projects - Ranked by Category and Total Points

2020-21 2021-22 Not Recommended Lead Points Project CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL

Kern Co. 53 Kern County (Delano): Lytle Avenue Total $0 $0 $1,436,028 $186,053 $0 $0 from West Cecil Avenue to County Line Road; Pave dirt Rd

Tehachapi 51 Tehachapi: Pinon Street from Brandon Total $885,299 $114,701 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lane east to Dennison Road; pave an unpaved street and install Class II bike lane

Shafter 50 Shafter: Santa Fe Way (SR 43) and E Total $1,327,950 $172,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 Los Angeles Ave/S Beech Ave Intersection; Operational Improvement/Construct Roundabout

Kern Co. 48 Kern County (Walker Basin): Williams Total $1,094,280 $141,776 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rd from Johns Road to Basin Street; Pave dirt Rd

Kern Co. 44 Kern County (Lake Isabella): Total $638,692 $82,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 Intersection of Elizabeth Norris Rd and Lake Isabella Blvd; Construct a traffic signal and ancillary facilities

Cal. City 43 In California City: Mendiburu Rd from Total $33,641 $4,359 $1,693,381 $246,897 $0 $0 Hacienda Blvd to Neuralia Rd; surface unpaved street

State 34 Near Lamont: SR 223 at SR Total $0 $0 $1,500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 184/Wheeler Ridge Road: construct single-lane roundabout (State fund source $2,741,000)

Kern Co. 28 Kern County (Tehachapi): Sand Total $2,362,277 $306,059 $0 $0 $0 $0 Canyon Rd from Tehachapi Blvd to Country Canyon Rd, approximately 7.2 miles in length; Construct 6-foot asphalt concrete shoulders and Shafter 28 Shafter: Santa Fe Way from Los Total $0 $0 $1,327,950 $172,050 $0 $0 Angeles Ave to Galpin St; Construct 8' shoulders on both sides of roadway

Wasco 28 Wasco: N. Palm Ave. between Total $140,266 $18,174 $350,671 $45,434 $0 $0 Margalo St. and Gromer Ave. (1/4 mile length); pave shoulders, construct bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Bakersfield 27 Bakersfield: Bounded by 7th Standard Total $0 $0 $3,447,358 $446,642 $0 $0 Rd, Kern River Parkway and approx 6 miles Friant-Kern Canal; construct Class I multi-use path ((ATP $4,306,000)

Kern Co. 44 **Kern County (Wasco): Scofield Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,996,510 $388,230 Avenue from West Lerdo Highway to Wasco City Limit, approximately 5.6 miles in length; Construct 6-foot asphalt concrete shoulders and Kern Co. 42 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Hageman Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $720,389 $93,335 Road from Heath Road to Jenkins Road; Heath Road from Rosedale Highway to Hageman Road; Pave Shoulders and construct Class II bike Kern Co. 40 **Kern County (Delano): Browning Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,349,779 $350,152 Road from Elmo Highway to Skyline Drive; Pave Shoulders

Kern Co. 37 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Rexland Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,517,096 $714,800 Acres (various streets); Complete streets improvements

Kern Co. 36 **Kern County (Bakersfield): North Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $524,810 $67,995 side of Casa Loma Drive from S. Union Avenue to Pogososo St; Complete streets improvements

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments December 26, 2019 Page 4 of 5 Category 4 - Discretionary CMAQ Program of Projects - Ranked by Category and Total Points

2020-21 2021-22 Not Recommended Lead Points Project CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL CMAQ LOCAL Kern Co. 32 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Gosford Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,570,140 $203,429 Road from SR 223 to SR 119; Pave Shoulders

Kern Co. 32 **Kern County (Lamont): Lamont Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,475,745 $1,040,600 Acres (various streets); Complete streets improvements

Kern Co. 30 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Hughes Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $643,135 $83,325 Lane from Terrace Way to Bakersfield City Limits, and a portion of Colton Street (0.3 miles); Construct asphalt concrete shoulders and ancillary Bakersfield 23 Bakersfield: Hageman Rd easterly Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,461,006 $966,653 across SR99 and connect with SR204; construct multi-use path

Kern Co. 23 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Tate Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $544,170 $70,503 Street from Niles Street to Oregon Street; Complete streets improvements

Kern Co. 22 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Mills Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $668,029 $86,551 Drive (SR 184 - Park Dr) & Park Dr (Mills Dr - 400 ft north); Complete streets improvements

Kern Co. 22 **Kern County (Tehachapi): Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $912,329 $118,202 Intersection of Tucker Rd and Highline Rd; Construct a traffic signal and ancillary facilities

Bakersfield 21 Bakersfield: along Pacheco Rd Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $439,020 $56,880 between Stine Rd and Wible Rd; construct multi-use path

Bakersfield 18 Bakersfield: Stockdale Ranch Dr to Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,036,190 $263,810 Kern River bike path south of Stockdale Hwy crossing Kern River; construct multi-use path

Kern Co. 18 **Kern County (Tehachapi): Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,649,197 $213,671 Intersection of Cummings Valley Rd and Bear Valley Rd; Construct a traffic signal and ancillary facilities

Tehachapi 0 Eastern Kern: SR 58 from General Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,752,000 $0 Beale Rd to SR 202; construct a climbing lane on the eastbound side of SR 58 along three segments (toll credit $659,755). NOT ELIGIBLE Kern Co. 0 Kern County (Bakersfield): Lake Ming Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 from Golf Course to Boys Camp; Construct 10-foot asphalt concrete Class I and Class II bike path and ancillary facilities WITHDRAWN Total $6,482,405 $839,869 $9,755,388 $1,597,076 $35,259,545 $4,718,136

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments December 26, 2019 Page 5 of 5 IV.K

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Raquel Pacheco, Regional Planner Rochelle Invina, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV K CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) – CONTINGENCY PROJECT POLICY AND PROJECT LIST

DESCRIPTION:

Kern COG staff is proposing to add about $22 million of contingency CMAQ programming in FFY 22-23 and 23-24 in the event that projects for FFY 20-21 and 21-22 are not delivered. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

In order not to lose federal-aid CMAQ Program funding to the Kern region, Kern COG staff is proposing to add about $22 million of contingency CMAQ projects in FFY 22-23 and 23-24 in the event that newly programmed projects for FFY 20-21 and FFY 21-22 are not delivered. Kern COG staff again proposes a one-time policy to moderate how these proposed contingency projects are to be programmed in FFY 22-23 and 23-24 but must advance to an earlier federal fiscal year.

The proposed policy will apply guidance to the CMAQ Call for Projects currently in progress to add an additional measure of opportunity to advance projects and ensure the full use of CMAQ revenue when it’s made available to the Kern region. A change was made to the draft list of projects circulated on December 26, 2019. The City of Bakersfield requested to add the remaining multi-use path project (Stockdale Ranch Dr to Kern River bike path) to the contingency list as reflected in the revised attachment.

CMAQ Contingency Project Policy

1. Kern COG staff shall select eligible projects from the most recent Call for Projects list that were not selected for programming in FFY 20-21 or FFY 21-22 to be considered as a contingency project.

2. Lead agencies of proposed CMAQ contingency projects must be in agreement with Kern COG staff recommendation to be included as a CMAQ contingency project.

3. Programming capacity for CMAQ contingency projects shall be limited to the estimated apportionment level for the fiscal year following two fiscal years of new project programming. Page 2 Final CMAQ Contingency February 2020

4. CMAQ funding shall be applied to the construction phase only for all contingency projects.

5. If a contingency project is not advanced prior to January 2022, the agency will be required to resubmit the project with a new application to be reviewed, ranked and prioritized as part of the next CMAQ Call for Projects.

Kern COG recommends approval of the CMAQ Contingency Project Policy as presented in this report and Attachment A: CMAQ Contingency Project List.

The TTAC reviewed this item on February 5, 2020 and recommends approval.

Attachment A: CMAQ Contingency Project List

ACTION: Approve the CMAQ Contingency Project Policy and CMAQ Contingency Project List. VOICE VOTE

Attachment A CMAQ CONTINGENCY PROJECT LIST

CMAQ Total Federal Federal Lead Description Points Local 22/23 23/24 Total Ridgecrest: City corporation yard; Installl electric vehicle Ridgecrest charging station and solar photovoltaic system1 17 $77,743 $556,457 $634,200 Bakersfield: Hageman Rd easterly across SR99 and connect with Bakersfield SR204; construct multi‐use path1 23 $3,179,903 $5,247,756 $8,427,659 Bakersfield: along Pacheco Rd between Stine Rd and Wible Rd; Bakersfield construct multi‐use path 21 $56,880 $439,020 $495,900

Bakersfield: Stockdale Ranch Dr to Kern River bike path south of Bakersfield Stockdale Hwy crossing Kern River; construct multi‐use path1 18 $529,400 $1,770,600 $2,300,000 **Kern County (Wasco): Scofield Avenue from West Lerdo Highway to Wasco City Limit, approximately 5.6 miles in length; Construct 6‐foot asphalt concrete shoulders and ancillary Kern Co. facilities 44 $388,230 $2,996,510 $3,384,740

**Kern County (Bakersfield): Hageman Road from Heath Road to Jenkins Road; Heath Road from Rosedale Highway to Kern Co. Hageman Road; Pave Shoulders and construct Class II bike lanes 42 $93,335 $720,389 $813,724 **Kern County (Delano): Browning Road from Elmo Highway to Kern Co. Skyline Drive; Pave Shoulders 40 $350,152 $1,349,779 $1,699,931 **Kern County (Bakersfield): North side of Casa Loma Drive from S. Union Avenue to Pogososo St; Complete streets Kern Co. improvements 36 $67,995 $524,810 $592,805 **Kern County (Lamont): Lamont Acres (various streets); Kern Co. Complete streets improvements 32 $1,040,600 $2,475,745 $3,516,345 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Gosford Road from SR 223 to SR Kern Co. 119; Pave Shoulders 32 $203,429 $1,570,140 $1,773,569 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Hughes Lane from Terrace Way to Bakersfield City Limits, and a portion of Colton Street (0.3 Kern Co. miles); Construct asphalt concrete shoulders and ancillary 30 $83,325 $643,135 $726,460 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Tate Street from Niles Street to Kern Co. Oregon Street; Complete streets improvements 23 $70,503 $544,170 $614,673

**Kern County (Tehachapi): Intersection of Tucker Rd and Kern Co. Highline Rd; Construct a traffic signal and ancillary facilities 22 $118,202 $912,329 $1,030,531 **Kern County (Bakersfield): Mills Drive (SR 184 ‐ Park Dr) & Park Dr (Mills Dr ‐ 400 ft north); Complete streets Kern Co. improvements 22 $86,551 $668,029 $754,580 **Kern County (Tehachapi): Intersection of Cummings Valley Rd and Bear Valley Rd; Construct a traffic signal and ancillary Kern Co. facilities 18 $213,671 $1,649,197 $1,862,868 Sum of Contingency $10,986,387 $11,081,679 $22,068,066

Note1: Per Contingency Project Policy #4, CMAQ funding shall be applied to construction phase only Note**: Kern County requested contingency consideration due to lack of local match

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments January 29, 2020 1 IV.L

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Raquel Pacheco, Regional Planner Rochelle Invina, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV L REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) – FINAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS

DESCRIPTION: The Final RSTP Program of Projects includes $23.9 million for member agency projects. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION: Timeline The next task in the RSTP call for projects process is request approval of the final program of projects as shown below:

RSTP Call for Projects Timeline Date Task December 2019 Circulate Draft Program of Projects to TTAC January 2020 Present Draft Program of Projects to TPPC February 2020 Approve Final Program of Projects and introduction into FTIP

No changes have been made to the Draft RSTP Program of Projects. The approved RSTP Program of Projects will then be incorporated into an amendment to the 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program to allow projects to advance to fiscal year 19/20.

Fund Estimate This call for projects will introduce projects to program against federal fiscal years 20/21 and 21/22. The RSTP fund estimate was approved at the March 21, 2019 Kern COG Board meeting. In addition to the RSTP funding, Caltrans notified Kern COG of the available Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) funding available to the Kern region. The HIP fund estimate was approved at the June 20, 2019 Kern COG Board meeting.

Kern COG recommends approval of the RSTP Program of Projects. The TTAC reviewed this item on February 5, 2020 and recommends approval.

Attachment A – Final 2019 RSTP Program of Projects Summary

ACTION: Approve the Final RSTP Program of Projects. VOICE VOTE Attachment A - FINAL 2019 RSTP Program of Projects Summary

2020-21 2021-22 Total Lead Project RSTP HIP LOCAL RSTP HIP LOCAL RSTP HIP LOCAL Available Apportionment by Year $11,986,331 $1,877,694 $11,979,194 $1,011,917 $23,965,525 $2,889,611 Arvin $111,539 $0 $14,452 $458,461 $75,000 $317,139 $570,000 $75,000 $331,591 Bakersfield $5,117,000 $1,315,000 $833,334 $5,114,000 $0 $662,573 $10,231,000 $1,315,000 $1,495,907 Cal. City $0 $49,222 $6,378 $391,000 $1,778 $182,591 $391,000 $51,000 $188,969 GROUPED PROJECT FOR PAVEMENT Delano $707,999 $182,000 $115,310 $707,999 $0 $91,731 $1,415,998 $182,000 $207,041 RESURFACING AND/OR $31,733 $14,611 $6,005 $728,267 $0 $94,355 $760,000 $14,611 $100,360 Ridgecrest REHABILITATION (NON-CAPACITY Taft PROJECTS ONLY) $0 $28,726 $3,722 $288,408 $3,274 $68,210 $288,408 $32,000 $71,932 Tehachapi $20,623 $0 $2,725 $309,377 $0 $40,848 $330,000 $0 $43,573 Wasco $0 $39,838 $5,162 $724,000 $54,162 $100,820 $724,000 $94,000 $105,982 Kern Co. $5,901,422 $203,147 $790,913 $2,371,563 $871,853 $420,219 $8,272,985 $1,075,000 $1,211,132 BAKERSFIELD: ROSEDALE HWY FROM $50,000 $0 $6,479 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $6,479 HEATH RD TO ALLEN RD (2 MILES); Kern Co. WIDENING (PE PHASE ONLY) NEAR WELDON: SIERRA WAY AT $46,015 $0 $5,962 $0 $0 $0 $46,015 $0 $5,962 SOUTH FORK KERN RIVER (.05 MILES); Kern Co. BRIDGE (PE PHASE ONLY) MCFARLAND: 2ND ST FROM WESTSIDE $0 $45,150 $5,850 $390,119 $5,850 $51,302 $390,119 $51,000 $57,152 CORNER OF HARLOW AVE TO CALIFORNIA AVE; LANDSCAPE AND McFarland PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS SHAFTER: ZERKER RD FROM EXPRESS $0 $0 $0 $496,000 $0 $239,192 $496,000 $0 $239,192 AVE TO FRIANT KERN CANAL; Shafter RECONSTRUCTION

2020-21 2021-22 Total RSTP HIP LOCAL RSTP HIP LOCAL RSTP HIP LOCAL Total RSTP and HIP Requested $11,986,331 $1,877,694 $1,796,292 $11,979,194 $1,011,917 $2,268,980 $23,965,525 $2,889,611 $4,065,272 Balance of Available Apportionment / $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 programmed

Kern COG: Regional Traffic Count Program - approved under separate action $79,677 $0 $10,323 $79,677 $0 $10,323 $159,354 $0 $20,646

LEGEND HIP Highway Infrastructure Program funding RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Program Prepared by Kern Council of Governments December 26, 2019 IV.M TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE

FROM: Ahron Hakimi Executive Director

By: Linda Urata Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV M KERN ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM - STATUS REPORT

DESCRIPTION: To help meet more stringent air standards, Kern COG promotes early deployment of alternative fuel vehicle technologies such as plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) and compressed natural gas-fueled vehicles. This report provides staff activity information, updates the quarterly inventory of EV charging spaces in Kern County, and provides funding information.

DISCUSSION:

MioCar: Kern COG staff members attended a quarterly meeting via conference call on Jan. 22, 2020.

CALeVIP: The California Energy Commission launched the CALeVIP program in the San Joaquin Valley on December 11, 2019. Funding identified for the counties of Kern, Fresno, and San Joaquin have been combined into one $14 million fund for zero emission vehicle charging infrastructure, with $5.25 million available in Kern County funds split evenly between DC Fast Chargers and Level 2 Chargers. As of this staff report, $181,000 remains available in Kern County for Level 2 charging stations. www.calevip.org

This funding may be combined with Valley Air District ChargeUP! Funding. www.valleyair.org.

This funding may be combined with Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District Funding. Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District DMV Grant Program Request for Proposals: The District is now accepting applications for their 2020 DMV Grant Program, which provides up to $50,000 for eligible projects. Applications are due February 28, 2020. Visit www.kernair.org for application guidelines and forms.

The CALeVIP system experienced technical difficulties on the day of the launch. While these are being resolved, applications are still being processed and funds have not been reserved to specific projects. To provide a snapshot of the applications submitted to CALeVIP, Kern COG received this update from Robb Lichtman with ChargePoint who partnered with TurnKey Solutions on this effort, which built on the Kern COG Kern EV Charging Station Blueprint published in June 2019.

“The numbers listed below are conservative and represent quantities that we expect to successfully deploy (actual application quantities are higher), pending funding awards.

Total Number of Level 2 Ports = 200+ Total Number of DC Fast Ports = 9 Total Number of Sites installing stations = 50+ Average Number of Ports per Site = 4

We have applications for sites in the following cities and communities: Arvin, Bakersfield, Buttonwillow, Delano, Lost Hills, McFarland, North Edwards, Ridgecrest, Shafter, Taft and Wasco.

Also, while we cast a wide net, reaching out to lots of prospects throughout Kern county, we know we did not reach everyone. Our pipeline accounts for approximately 33% of the Level 2 CALeVIP applications.

We are proud of our efforts thus far, but we know there is a lot of work needed to bring these projects to completion.”

California VW Mitigation Trust: The California Air Resources Board and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District have launched the following Volkswagen Appendix D Mitigation funded program.

• Zero-Emission Transit, School and Shuttle Buses will spend $130 million over two cycles, with $65 million available starting in December 2019. 50% of the funding must be spent in Disadvantaged Communities. The school bus portion of the funding is oversubscribed. Transit and shuttle bus funding remains. www.vwbusmoney.valleyair.org

San Joaquin Valley Electric Vehicle Partnership: Forty-two people attended the site tour at Wasco Union Elementary School District to hear about and to see the solar covered parking and charging stations on January 14, 2020.

On January 30, 2020 Southern California Gas Company hosted a ribbon cutting at their compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling station at 35118 McMurtrey Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93308. The new station will help clean the air and reduce climate emissions along the major logistics transportation corridor off Highways 99 and 65 in Bakersfield. The station can fill two heavy duty trucks in 12 minutes dispensing a total equivalent of 240 gallons of gasoline. SoCalGas has committed to delivering 20 percent of the natural gas it buys for homes and businesses from renewable sources (RNG) by 2030. The station is located at SoCalGas’ Bakersfield operating base, a net-zero energy building that earned Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold Certification by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) for its environmental features. These include a photovoltaic solar energy system, storm water management, drought-resistant and climate-appropriate landscaping, the use of natural lighting and a super energy-efficient air conditioning system powered by natural gas. Kern COG staff assisted SoCalGas with their talking points by providing truck traffic data for the region. Kern County Supervisor David Couch and Bakersfield Mayor Karen Goh spoke during the event.

On February 21, 2020 16 10 a.m. ChargePoint will dedicate a fast charging station at Tejon Ranch Best Western located at 5521 Dennis McCarthy Drive, Lebec, CA 93243. Assembly Member Vince Fong is the featured speaker.

SAVE THE DATE! Kern Council of Governments will host the 2020 TRANSITions Transit Symposium on February 27, 2020 at Hodel’s Country Dining in Bakersfield.

ACTION: INFORMATION IV.N TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director

By: Ed Flickinger, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV N FEDERAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT (PM1) “TOWARD ZERO” 2020 TARGET UPDATE

DESCRIPTION:

Required federal process to annually monitor transportation safety performance measure progress, including encouragement of member agencies to improve safety on our streets with their transportation expenditures. This item was reviewed by the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee.

DISCUSSION:

Background - On February 15, 2018, the Kern COG Transportation Planning Policy Committee approved their first federal “Toward Zero” deaths and accidents safety targets using the federal recommended methodology that employs a 5-year running average, consistent with the methodology recommend by Caltrans Division of Traffic Operations staff at that time.

On August 24, 2018 Caltrans management changed the state methodology using a more aspirational method that uses a fixed target dubbed “Vision Zero” where the target assumes a steady decline to zero accidents using set percentages per year. The state method is soon to be made available on line at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/shsp/target.

Kern COG staff is recommending continued use of the 2018 “Toward Zero” target method adopted by Kern COG in 2018 which is consistent with the federal rule methodology but different than the current state method. Maintaining the same method allows for better comparability with prior targets with minimal consequences.

Consequences of not meeting the targets – Consequences of roadway accidents can be catastrophic to those who are involved. Everyone agrees that all appropriate countermeasures to reduce accidents should be taken. In addition, minor regulatory and funding consequences exist if the federal targets are not achieved. However, consequences of not adopting, monitoring, and encouraging progress toward the target, in accordance with federal rules, can ultimately result in loss of all federal transportation funding to the region though de-certification of the agency.

Under the requirements of the recent federal transportation spending bills, states and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) like Kern COG are required to annually monitor safety performance measure progress through the statewide and metropolitan planning process. Failure to meet safety targets set by the state and/or MPO could result in the minor consequence of redistribution of Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding at the state level into the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Many of the projects in the ATP program improve safety for bike and pedestrians, and would likely still be eligible under HSIP.

The Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) will review how MPOs are working to achieve their targets, in accordance with the federal rules, as they conduct MPO Certification Reviews every 4 years. Failure to adequately address target performance measure requirements could eventually result in loss of the MPO’s federal certification along with access to federal transportation funds. The 2018 Kern COG federal target compliance documentation is available here ( http://www.kerncog.org/federal-performance-measures/ ) and was accepted at the federal certification review.

Rules and guidance for federal performance measure targets are still being established by FHWA (see https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/spm/policy_and_guidance.cfm ). A couple of workshops have been given by Caltrans over the past 2 years and a draft statewide target has been submitted to FHWA (see https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/shsp/target ). MPOs that do not submit a safety target update by February 27, 2020, will be required to adhere to the 2020 state target which is NOT consistent with the methodology proposed by Kern COG staff.

The “Toward Zero” methodology - The attached presentation demonstrates the Kern COG “Toward Zero” methodology which is consistent with the original 2018 state safety target methodology originally recommended by Caltrans Division of Traffic Operations engineers. In addition, the Kern methodology was prepared under the supervision of a certified engineer. The methodology uses California Highway Patrol (CHP) historical accident data for Kern County. The data is extrapolated using a 5 year running average to forecast future accidents and fatalities. In addition, we use travel model data to tie the forecast to local assumed growth. Targets are essentially being set to show improvement over the previous 5 year accident data. As accidents improve, the targets will improve automatically with each annual update on a trajectory “Toward Zero.”

Countywide monitoring results summary

2012-2018 7-Year Change in 5-Year Running Average Accident Rates 1% decrease in vehicle related fatality rates from 1.62 to 1.6 per 100M miles traveled. 7% increase in vehicle related serious injury rates from 3.61 to 3.86 per 100M miles traveled. 32% increase in combined bike and pedestrian related injury/fatality rates from .000082 to .000108 per 1000 population.

2017-2018 1-Year Change in Annual Accident Rates 30% decrease in vehicle related fatality rates from 2 to 1.54 per 100M miles traveled. 33% increase vehicle related serious injury rates from 3.77 to 5 per 100M miles traveled. No Change in combined bike and pedestrian related injury/fatality rates from .000011 to .000011 per 1000 population.

Source: 2009-2018 CHP SWITRS data which only contains accidents reported to the CHP.

Longer term historic trends show that vehicle accidents track with economic fluctuations. In Kern, recent temporary rebound in oil prices are resulted in an increase in both the economy and roadway accidents. The recent drop in bike and pedestrian accidents in the last year of the data may be in part due to extensive investment in safer bike and pedestrian facilities identified in recent bike/complete street plans adopted for the region back 2012, as well as the 2017 Active 2

Transportation Plan.

What your agency can do to accelerate attainment of the federal safety targets - Kern COG’s member agencies are encouraged to promote projects and policies that will help the region to perform better than the targets proposed for our region. The Caltrans Strategic Highway Safety Plan proposes four countermeasures to improve safety: engineering, education, enforcement and emergency services. Projects such as countdown pedestrian signals, buffered bike lanes, roundabouts, and establishing extra safety corridor patrols where spikes in accident activity occur, should be considered wherever appropriate. Since 2007 the Kern Region has seen over $20M invested in the HSIP program alone (see Attachment 2). In addition, state and federal programs as well as Kern COG’s project delivery policies give extra points for projects that improve safety, including:

• Highway Safety and Improvement Program (HSIP) – local & state road safety projects • State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) – state highway safety projects • Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) – local road maintenance & safety projects • Active Transportation Program (ATP) – (58%-78% pts. for safety & need depending on size) • Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) – (50% of points safety/congestion) • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) – (40% of points for safety/congestion) • Kern Motorist Aid Authority (KMAA) – Travel info., safety roadside cleanup, safety corridors

Zero fatalities on our streets is everyone’s goal and it is anticipated that emerging safety technology standards such as autonomous vehicles will eventually help drive down these safety targets “Toward Zero.” This report will be updated annually. The TTAC unanimously approved this item on February 5, 2020.

Attachment

1) Presentation – Towards Zero: Draft Safety Performance Target Update - Kern Region 2) Kern HSIP Projects 2007-2018

ACTION:

Approve the 2020 Kern “Toward Zero” safety targets consistent with federal methodology and direct staff to work with member agencies and stakeholders to develop projects that will accelerate attainment of the targets.

10/24/2019

SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGET UPDATE

~ w.~• ...... , ~ C l!I !I ~ Federal Highway { .. Adminlslrollon NHTSA lif/tmM• ..,.,..,.MINll,U--Ht __,ra.t,._ • .u Kern Council ( 4.Ht •...... ,_...,,_••la • ttl( I -of Governments •

FEDERAL Requirements: MPOs Evaluated During 4-Year Review

• Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) will be held accountable for safety progress through the statewide and metropolitan planning process. FHWA will review how MPOs are addressing and achieving their targets (or assisting the State in achieving targets) as they conduct Transportation Management Area (TMA) 4-year Certification Reviews (only for large MPOs with more than 200,000 population). The TMA Certification Review requires the Secretary to certify whether the metropolitan planning process of an MPO serving as a TMA meets requirements, including the requirements of 23 USC 134 and other applicable Federal law.

1 1

10/24/2019

FEDERAL Requirements: State Failure= More HSIP Safety Funding

• If a State DOT does not meet or make significant progress toward meeting its HSIP targets, the State shall use obligation authority equal to the HSIP apportionment for the fiscal year prior to the target year only for HSIP projects and submit an HSIP Implementation Plan to FHWA. For example, if a State DOT does not meet or make significant progress towards meeting its 2019 safety targets, in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022, the State DOT must use obligation authority equal to the FY 2018 HSIP apportionment only for HSIP projects and submit an HSIP Implementation Plan by June 30, 2021 .

Five Performance Targets Under New Federal Regulations +1

Motorized Vehicles ..,..,. Number of Fatalities (SWITRS) ..,..,. Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT (SWITRS & HPMS) ..,..,. Number of Serious Injuries (SWITRS) ..,..,. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT (SWITRS & HPMS) • Non-Motorized ot"o,;.. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries • (Bicycles and Pedestrians) (SWITRS) of-a,;. Rate of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries (SWITRS & Travel Model) (This is not required but provided for information) 4

2 2

10/24/2019

iJ?b. Causes of Traffic Collisions

Roadway

34%, 93%,

12°/o

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TARGET SETTING Under Development by Caltrans ·~ Tari:et Settine Steps ofo;.

V) ~ V> QI. l'!' 3 '< j a:: i ..I i ...... _ ! ~ - n ~--- - "' "' ScenMio 1 Scenano 2 ...

r ime Time nme Kflere ate Ke ro.v7 Whal external fadOIS MtM trf)aCI Whal can 11C do lo make Eslimale eX!Sltng lmnd O!Slalgcl? 111f¥ovetnenlS? Adjust trend for expected Esbmale target ba~ on ~ and aoaoeoonomac forecasted fala!ity reduclJon from chariga:, $8lely plar\, Source Cambodge Systema!ICS. Inc.

3 3

10/24/2019

Reported Vehicle Only Accidents in Kern 2014-18 ' '"" ...

...... ,, 0

Rosamond Sourctt· bf• HER£. ~1m1n ltittrmllp ,nc:r6ntf\i P Corp .. GlBCO USGS, FAO NPS. NfKAN GN8~. IGN Kad.s1t, NL Old1'141"Kt Survey. E,:11 lop.CU\ METt &.1 Ch11'1.l ~on.') 11;on9) {C) Optt\StJ'HlMap con111bu10fs. ;1nr:l 1ht The maps above illustrate a portion of the CH P SWITRS data used in the analysis. The maps arlfmissing appr~~t'ffi~eTy°Ralf of that accident location due to lack of mapping coordinates. The map combines all injury and fatality accidents for reported motor vehicle incidents. 7

Reported Vehicle Only Accidents in Metro 2014-18

This map illustrates a portion of the CHP SWITRS data used in the analysis. The maps are missing approximately half of that accident location due to lack of mapping coordinates. The map combines all injury and fatality accidents reported motor vehicle incidents.

4 4

10/24/2019

• Reported Bike/Ped Accidents in Kern 2014-18 .... ot"o...... --.... - .. . "' .. ...

......

\0'-111tt ht1 HlM 6,11111 tn""11p 1• rn1,c I .(8(0 US6S. Fli,O 1'P$ Nl

Reported ~/Ped Accidents in Metro 2014-18 ofo;.

This map illustrates a portion of the CHP SWITRS data used in the analysis. The maps are missing approximately half of T that accident location due to lack of mapping coordinates. The map combines all injury and fatality °"""' accidents for reported bike and ...... ,m•JO<-~--,c..,.),-.,,....., .... """''-'-''-....._,.~ · ....., ... _..., ._..__._ .,_...___ _ r- -+ .,._"' pedestrian incidents.

5 5

10/24/2019

Reported Bike/Ped Accidents in Central IMl etro 2011-18 I , ofo*

This map illustrates a portion of the CHP SWITRS data used in the analysis. The maps are missing

e~ "' approximately half of that accident location due to lack of mapping coordinates. The map combines all injury and fatality bn.:KO accidents for reported bike and

N ...... ,, """"''"''"°:S~:""C.:..':;:'~ pedestrian incidents.

Perceived Bike and Ped Safety Hazards https://streetstory.berkeley.edu/reports.php

Crashes/ Near-misses Hazards/ Safe places ofo* -·- ' L., ... " These maps are \ 1 t I ~>.1 from a website •·"'- ! that allows the I~~; .\ public to log collisions/near T J.--1.. • 1-! misses/hazards ~ I' .:..\ """''WI ~..._ and safe places for bike and pedestrians. Kern is a pilot \ '-·· project for this website.

Repon l'yf» ,..... , _..,. ' • ,-:C..,rWI.,._, ll 1 ·- \

6 6

10/24/2019

Countywide Accident Rate Monitoring Results 2011-2018 7-Year Change in 5-Year Running Average Accident Rates 1% decrease in vehicle related fatality rates from 1.62 to 1.6 per 100M miles traveled. 7% increase in vehicle related serious injury rates from 3.61 to 3.86 per 100M miles t raveled . • of-o • 32% increase in combined bike and pedestrian related injury/fatality rates from 1' .000082 to .000108 per 1000 population. 2017-2018 1-Year Change in Annual Accident Rates ~ 30% decrease in vehicle related fatality rates from 2 to 1.54 per 100M miles traveled 33% increase vehicle related serious injury rates from 3.77 to 5 per 100M miles ~ traveled. No change in combined bike and pedestrian related injury/fatality rates from ofo;; .000011 to .000011 per 1000 population.

SAFETY PERFORM-\NCE MANAGEMENT TARGET i;;ETIJNG

Statewide Economic Determinism (1998-2016)

5,000 "\\"ith only mod~ing the unemployment r-:lt~ 0.11d pe-r C'C\pitn. GDP gtO\'-'lh i.t1 Cnlifornit'. this 4,500 :.tcc:oums for 70*,o of cht'! vt::uh· ,·:iri:u.ion.s in collisions" 4,000 ...../a' ~ --- -,./ 3,500 __ ---· ,, ...~ al J,000 ~ 2.500 ~ ... 2.000 5 ;.. 1,500 "'IC ..,,,. z 1,000 500

.500 1998 1999 .!000 2001 2002 200J 2004 :!005 1006 :?007 :!008 2009 :!010 .'.!011 .'.!012 .'.!OIJ :!1114 :'015 :!1116 - Fau.ht1ts 3,4S9 J.5S9 3,730 3,926 4,089 4,22S 4,094 4,30-I 4.W 3.~6 3,401 3,076 !,739 2.835 2,995 J,107 3,074 3,n 3680 \:,lCl~loymt.ltR.attC°~) 5.70". 5.oc,1• .f70'. 6.~ ... 6.SOt,o 66()11:'i, >.S0o·1e 5.l~!• .f9()0. 6.00':. 9.JOO·• 12.lO'ol2.lOtol1.00',. 960"• azr:,,. 6.9()":. 5.90'!. 5.ZO-• PctCapa:iGDPGrowth -4.?-, 5.9", 6.0', -1.,.• 1..3', 2.~. 3.,r, 3.2", 2-•. o.~ • .05'·• -5.4', .0.1•. o..... t-t.•. 1.6'. 2.1•. 3..?. 3.7"·· - ~!odd (R2•0.7 3636 3705 3761 4132 3728 3619 3'.'T' 3944 4050 3961 3315 31:?7 ~597 2813 J0.19 3367 3627 3754 38'4

7 7

1/17/2020

PRELIMINARY Vehicle • Total Motorized fatalities 11)() Forecast 2019-2024 .... Kern 180 •Gf?o.. 154 1'0 144 \ - ...- \;'° 35! ~ll6''· / - -J.- rat t - "4 J 5 ear IR~nr gA !"10 ------100 -

1010 10-\1 ,OU- ,on ,014 ,01c; ,016 ,011 --701/l 7Wl 10,0 nm nm 1(113 -,ou - raullt!u "'"'1>9 JO, 07 Iii no lll ns 141 18S 14•1 148 112 ,s, JS, 161 167 - t;Yr.F:it~ilil'., m m m u, m no 141 ... l!il 1'4 1S7 1S2 1SG 1S9

Source: CHP SWITRS data, Kern COG Travel Model Forecast years assume base year fatality rates per mile of travel (VMT) stay same. Target assumes we will do better than t he base year model rate. 1~

PRELIMINARY H.ltc:of Molofi,cd hll.:.litics RJtcs Pcf 100M Miles l - ;"I

1.00

F LI IES O.o,O

000 ...... 200, 2010 Oil- 2012 ?013 2014 201S 201b 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2013 202' - f aulit1e~ , _o, - 11• !.'.II, 1.54 , .. 1.61 ,... l-61l - s-Ytrau,11r:1u 1.62 ,... 1,64 1.60 1,il 1.61

Source: CHP SWITRS data, Kern COG Travel Model Forecast years assume base year fatality rates per mile of travel (VMT) stay same. l G Target assumes we will do better t han t he base year model rate.

1 8

1/17/2020

PRELIMINARY Vehide · Toial Motorized SNious Injuries Forecast 2019-2024 soo 468 Kern ·'° •Gf?o.. 400

200

150 S ri u In ie

100

>009 ,010 ,011 1012 101, 1014 ,0111 ,on ,on ,on ,.,. -SiT«al 260 ias ,n 2'0 ,., ,., .... 4i6 420 '103 331 1/1 - -;v,.\1 ,., ,,. ,.. 27S 341 43G 420 403

Source: CHP SWITRS data, Kern COG Travel Model Forecast years assume base year serious Inj ury rates per mile of travel (VMT) stay same. 1/ Target assumes we w ill do better t han t he base year model rate.

PRE LIM I NARY RJtc or Motori.icd Scriou!o 11,jutv R.:itcs Per 100M M iles rr'Jvclcd Annu.>lly 000 Forecast 2019-2024 Kern 5.0 4.6

,... S RI u

, oo

100

0.00 ,010 :101) ,01, ,on 71)14 101', 7016 7011 ,.,. ?q]O 1011 ,on :.ion ,.,. -5'Tot.,I """3,31 3,li3 3.46 3.2•1 ... '58 3.55 ),'11 ),77 S,00 "'"4,78 '1.56 '1,35 ~1' ..., 3.73 _ ,,.,,," 'H,l V50 '''jl '\4,! 3,4\ 3,40 ),'-,0 3,116 .t,10 4.)1 u• 4.',/ .,., 4.14 -51TtllJ - sv,." Source: CHP SWITRS data, Kern COG Travel Model Fo recast years assume base year serious Injury rates per mile of t ravel (VMT) stay same. 18 Target assumes we w ill do better t han t he base year model rate.

1 9

1/17/2020

PRELIMINARY Bike , Ped Total Serious Injuries , Fatalit ies Forecast 2019-2024 170 • Kern of-o. 100 ,. nnn A 1: 80 i• ••

... URE ,. IE

2009 2010 2011 1012 1013 201' 201S 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ,.,. -Ba•!)etl)I S1 s, 43 44 ., 71 n n ,. ., 6S ., - fk..:e•PE

PRELIMINARY- Optional Measure (not federally required) Ped , Bike Injuries, Fatalijies Rate Per 1000 Population Kern 0.00014 ofo • Forecast 2019-2024 0.00017

0.00010 ;. rage ·-SER u " 0.00004

0.00002 FAT. ITI

0.00000 ,... ?010 ,on ?01? ?Ol'i ?014 ?01', 10)~ ?011 7018 ?Ol'l ?070 70?1 ?01'/ 70?) :>014 -Bikt•P.cdSl/1000 M0006 .00006 •oooos (M)0006 MOOOS 0,00007 .00006 0,00006 0,00006 0.00006 0,00008 0.00001 0,00007 0.00007 0,00006 o.oooo,; - B1ke•l>t•c:fh\l;)I/IOOO 0.00003 0.00003 0.00003 0.00003 000004 0.00003 0.00004 0.00005 0.00005 0.00003 0.0000) 0.00003 0.00003 00000) 0.00004 0...,... - w 81":e•l'ed !il•r'a\,M/1000 000000, """°""' O.OOOOS'J ...... , 0J)OOM1 0.000100 (..000104 0.00010a 0.000110 0.0001 11 0.00011)6 0.000104 0.000101 o.oooo,q11 - o!~•Ped raul/1000 -oc1ct•~t1sv1000 - ~-vr B!~•Ped sa~rital/1000 Source: CHP SWITRS data, Kern COG Travel Model Forecast years assume base year fatality rates per mile of travel (VMT) stay same. ,o Ta et assumes we will do better than the base ear model rate.

1 10

10/25/2019

PRELIMINARY 2020 FEDERAL TARGETS UPDATE - Statewide & Kern Statewide New Old Five Performance Targets for 2020 {5-yr) for 2019 {5-vr) ~ Number of Fatalities = 3518 3445.4 ~ Rate of Fatalities per lOO Mjllion VMT = l.023 0.995 ~ Number of Serious I,~uries = 13740.4 12.688.1 ~ Rate of Serious lqjuries per 100 Million VMT = 3.994 3.661 of-a,;. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Non-Motorized Serious Injuries (Bicycles and Pedestrians) = 4147.4 3949.8 Kern Five Performance Targets for 2020 {5-yr) for 2019 (5-vr) ~ Number of Fatalities = 154 (4.4% of the State*) 165 ~ Rate of Fataliti es per 100 Mi ll ion VMT = 1 .64 1 .85 ~ Number of Serious Iqjuries = 405 (2.9% of the State*) 336 ~ Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT- 4.31 3.77 of-otJ:i Nt~mber ofNon-Mot~rized Fatalities and Non-Motorized Serio~s Injuries (Bicycles and Pedestnans) = 103 (2.5% of the State**) 99 - " *Kern accounts for 2. 7% of the state VMT in 2017. **Kern accounts for 2.3% of the state population in July 2017.

Toward Zero - What your agency can do:

The Caltrans Strategic Highway Safety Plan proposes four countermeasures to improve safety: engineering, education, enforcement and emergency services. Projects such as: countdown pedestrian signals, buffered bike lanes, roundabouts, and establishing extra safety corridor enforcement, where spikes in accident activity occur, should be considered where appropriate. In addition, state and federal funding programs as well as Kern COG's project delivery policies give extra points for projects that improve safety, including:

• Highway Safety and Improvement Program (HSIP) - local & state road safety projects • State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) - state highway safety projects • Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) - local road maintenance & safety projects • Active Transportation Program (ATP) - (58%-78% pts. for safety & need depending on size) • Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) - (50% of points safety/congestion) • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) - (40% of points for safety/congestion) • Kern Motorist Aid Authority (KMAA) - Travel info., safety roadside cleanup, safety corridors

11 11

2007-2018 Highway Safety and Improvement Program (HSIP) – Kern Region

Agency Unique Project Year Location of Work Description of Work Federal Funds Name Project ID Cost

Various existing intersection locations throughout the City of Arvin with Install new striped pedestrian crosswalks, stop bars, striping and a few Arvin 2018 H9-06-001 $ 249,900 $ 249,900 an emphasis on locations adjacent to parks and schools. curb ramps. Install traffic signals, ra ilroad crossings, upgrade and install new Arvin 20 13 HSIP6-06-001 Bear Mountain Blvd (SR 223)/Derby St $724,400 $651,700 pavement, striping and pavement markers Calloway Drive in front of Norris Middle School at existing crosswalk Bakersfiel 2018 H9-06-002 near Manhattan Drive; Monitor Street in front of Palla Elementary Install flashing yellow beacons near crosswalks. $ 246,100 $ 246,100 d School at existing crosswalk near Kyner Avenue.

Bakersfiel Fifty-seven (57) signalized intersections within the north west portion of Remove existing pedestrian walk/don't walk signal heads and install 2016 H8-06-001 $ 124,400 $ 111,960 d the City of Bakersfield. new pedestri an countdown timer modules for all pedestrian crossings.

Bakersfiel Eighty-eight (88) signalized intersections with in the south west portion of Remove existing pedestrian walk/don't walk signal heads and install 20 16 H8-06-002 $ 21 1,200 $ 190,080 d the City of Bakersfield. new pedestrian countdown timer modules for all pedestrian crossings.

Bakersfiel Various Locations - 62 signalized intersections within the north east 2015 HSIP7-06-004 Install pedestrian countdown head at each signalized intersection $ 194,000 $ 174,600 d portion of the City of Bakersfield

Bakersfiel Various Locations - 50 signalized intersections within the south east 20 15 HSIP7-0S-005 Install pedestrian countdown head at each signalized intersection $ 168,000 $ 151 ,200 d portion of the City of Bakersfield 1-- - ,-1.;,11-.;:.1 HSIP6-06-002 ,__ .. _,., .. ", 20 13 60 intersections throughout the City of Bakersfield Install pedestrian countdown signal heads $190,000 $171 ,000 ,~ 20 12 HSIP5-0S-001 Twenty (20) intersections within the city Install pedestrian countdown heads $129,000 $1 16,000 ,~~,w.~"-' 2011 HSIP4-06-007 Various locations throughout the city Install pedestrian countdown heads $126,000 $1 13,400 ' ~"-' 2008 6340 INSTALL FLASHING BEACONS AND CURB RAMPS. BENTON STREET BETWEEN MING AVE. AND W ILSON RD . $40,100 $36.090 Twenty-two (22) uncontrolled pedestrian crossing locations throughout Install pedestrian crossings at uncontrolled locations; Install/upgrade Delano 2018 H9-06-004 $ 249,300 $ 249,300 the City of Delano. larger intersections warning/regulatory signs. Install pedestrian actuated warning systems; Install Advanced Yield Delano 2015 HSIP7-06-006 32 non-signalized crosswalk locations throughout the City of Delano. $ 437,900 $ 437,900 Markings, and Install Pedestrian Crossing Signs Delano 20 13 HSIP6-06-004 Cecil Ave/Albany St Upgrade traffic signals; Install protected left-turn phasing $320,600 $288,500 Delano 2008 6375 INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CECIL AVE. AND HIETT AVE. INTERSECTION $350,000 $315,000 Install continental crosswalks, intersection warning signs, reflective Kern Eighty-two (82) crosswalk locations at 79 intersections throughout Kern 2018 H9-06-010 signs, pedestrian crossing signs, ADA curb ramps, street lighting, $ 5,196,300 $ 5,120,300 County County. cross drains, and AC tie-ins. Kern The intersections of Roberts Lane at Sequoia Drive, Norris at Manor, 2018 H9-06-011 Upgrade signals from pedestal to overhead mast arm s. $ 787,600 $ 787,600 Countv and Manor at China Grade Looo. Construct intersection improvements, including replacing signal Various signalized intersections throughout the unincorporated Kern hardware at 30 intersections, installing raised pavement 2018 H9-06-012 Bakersfield, Oildale, Wheeler Ridge, Lake Isabella, and Rosamond $ 1,567,200 $ 1,567,200 County markers/striping at 22 intersections, and upgrading existing ADA- communities of Kern Cou nty. accessible curb ramps. Kern San Diego Street between Hall Road and Burgundy Avenue, in the Install continental crosswalks and lighting at four existing uncontrolled 2018 H9-06-013 $ 250,000 $ 227,700 Countv unincorporated communitv of Lamont, Kern Countv. pedestrian crossinq areas. Kern Convert signal to mast arm for east/west bound traffic on Quincy St 2016 HB-06-007 Intersection of Mount Vernon Ave at Quincy St $ 219,100 $ 219,100 County and install pedestrian countdown signal heads Kern install additional signal heads at north. west and east bound directions 2016 H8-06-008 Intersection of Airport Dr at Norris Rd $ 219,100 $ 219,100 Countv on the near side of the intersection. Kern 2016 H8-06-009 Various locations in unincorporated Bakersfield and Rosamond areas. Installation of pedestrian countdown signal heads. $ 272,000 $ 250,000 Countv Kern 2016 H8-06-010 Various locations throughout the County of Kern. Upgrade existing guardrails. $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 County Kern 20 15 HSIP7-06-007 South Union Ave between Taft Highway and Ming Avenue. Construct left turn channelization $ 1,134,300 $ 1,020,870 Countv Kern 2012 HSIPS-06-014 Patton Way between Hageman Rd. and Snow Rd. Modify traffic signals; install two-way left-tu rn lane $180,000 $144,000 County Kern Construct left-turn lanes; modify traffic signals; install pedestrian 2012 HSIP5-06-015 Roberts Ln./Oildale Dr. $139,000 $109,000 Countv countdown heads

1 of1 2 December 12, 2018

2007-2018 Highway Safety and Improvement Program (HSIP) – Kern Region

Agency Unique Project Year Location of Work Description of Work Federal Funds Name Project ID Cost

Kern 20 11 HSIP4-06-013 Mount Vernon Ave. between Kentucky St. and Niles Pt. Modify raised medians; relocate crosswalk; construct curb ramps $213,000 $191 ,000 Countv Kern 2008 6370 UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SOUTH UNION AVENUE AND PACHECO RD $231 ,000 $207,900 County Kern 2008 6369 UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS; CONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS BERNARD ST. AND ALTA VISTA DR. INTERSECTI ON $165,000 $148,500 Countv Kern 2008 6371 UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS; CONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS SOUTH UNION AVE. AND FAIRVIEW RD . INTERSECTION $231 ,000 $207,900 County Kern UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS; REMOVE FIXED OBJECTS; 2007 5435 INTERSECTION OF FLOWER ST. AND HALEY ST $303,600 $273,240 County CONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS. Upgrade signing with new Solar flashing LED Stop signs, traffic Various stop controlled intersections along Garzoli Avenue, and Perkins stripi ng and markings, solar Speed Lim it warn ing flashing beacon Mcfarland 2016 H8-06-012 $ 212,400 $ 212,400 Ave and 5th Street. signs with radar speed feedback, crosswalk with In Roadway warning lia hts and uomade ADA cu rb ramos. Shafter 2015 HSIP7-06-008 Lerdo Hiahwav between Cherry Ave. and Zerker Rd . Install quardrail $ 1,08 1,800 $ 1,081,800 Shafter 20 11 HSIP4-06-006 Lerdo Hwy. between Cherry Ave. and Driver Rd . Install median guardrail signs. striping, and pavement markings $1 ,260,800 $900,000 Remove existing roadway luminaries and install high performance cobra heads LED Roadway Luminaries, install Radar Speed Feed Taft 2016 H8-06-013 Kern Street between 1st Street and Hillard Street. $ 432,000 $ 432,000 Back Sig ns, re -design pedestrians crosswalks, repaint and add markinas. Upgrade roadway signs and various intersections as recommended in Wasco 2018 H9-06-021 Various locations on local roadways throughout Wasco. $ 114,023 $ 114,023 2017 City of Wasco Roadway Safety Signs Audit Project Report. Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), high visibility Wasco 2016 H8-06-015 Various locations around Ba rker Park $ 178,800 $ 160,920 crosswalks, infill sidewalk, and ADA curb ramps. Wasco 20 15 HSIP7-06-009 Various locations within the Wasco cilv limits Roadwav Safetv Sian Audit and sian uoarade/installation oroiect $ 143,900 $ 143,900 Wasco 2010 HSIP3-06-041 Palm Ave. between SR 46 and 9th Place Construct ADA comoliant cu rb, a utter, sidewalk, and curb ramos $232,900 $184,000 Wasco 2008 6366 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 7TH STREET BETWEEN BROADWAY AND PALM AVENUES $235,100 $211 ,590 MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK ON POSO DRIVE BETWEEN GRIFFITH Wasco 2007 5441 IN STALL IN-PAVEMENT CROSSWALK LIGHTS $55,000 $49,500 AVE. AND POPLAR AVE. Wasco 2007 5442 INSTALL IN-PAVEMENT CROSSWALK LIGHTS. INTERSECTION OF PALM AVE. AND 9TH PLACE. $189,700 $170,730 HSIP • Kern Total 2007-2018 $20,205,523 $19,057,003

2 of2 2 December 12, 2018

IV.O

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Ed Flickinger, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV O LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) GRANTS UPDATE

DESCRIPTION: On October 8, 2019, Caltrans announced a Call for Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) grants. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION: Kern COG has circulated a draft MOU and RFP for cities intending to participate in the Kern COG consultant contract to develop LRSP documents for those cities. Caltrans planning grant funds will be directly accessed by Kern COG under normal invoicing protocol to finance the consultant contract while the required 10% match will be accessed either by separate invoices or one-time-transfers from the participating cities to Kern COG. The grant information in the table below has been provided by Caltrans and indicates who will be awarded planning funds to develop an agency LRSP based on recently submitted grant applications to Caltrans.

As Approved by Caltrans KCOG MOU City Name Local Total LRSP Local Total Cost LRSP Funds Funds Cost Funds Funds City of Arvin $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 City of Bakersfield $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 City of Delano $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 City of Maricopa $25,000 $22,500 $2,500 $25,000 $22,500 $2,500 City of Shafter $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 City of Taft $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 City of Tehachapi $50,000 $45,000 $5,000 $50,000 $45,000 $5,000 City of Wasco $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 $80,000 $72,000 $8,000 TOTALS $395,000 $355,500 $39,500 $395,000 $355,500 $39,500

Draft Timeline:

February 2020 Review Draft MOU and Draft Request for Proposals April 2020 Finalize with participating cities MOU and Request for Proposals May 2020 Adopt MOU Request for Proposals – request approval from Board to advertise May 2020 Advertise Request for Proposals July 2020 Deadline to receive Proposals September 2020 Board approval of consultant contract September 2021 Completion of consultant contract and LRSP documents

Action: Information IV.P TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Rob Ball, Planning Director Ed Flickinger, Regional Planner III

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV P BIENNIAL LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS SURVEY – FEBRUARY 2020

DESCRIPTION:

All Kern COG member agencies, be watching for the statewide biennial local streets and roads survey scheduled to be emailed out in early February 2020 to be used to help direct road maintenance funding to local jurisdictions. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

Since 2008 the biennial Statewide Local Streets and Roads survey has been sent out by the Save California Streets Coalition. Save California Streets is comprised of several organizations including the California League of Cities. More information can be found on http://www.savecaliforniastreets.org along with the 2018 report. The survey will be sent by email to TTAC members and public works personnel. A consultant will send a login and password to complete the survey online. Some of the information requested will be: • Pavement condition data • Safety, traffic & regulatory data (e.g. storm drains, ramps etc.) • Funding/expenditure projections

Full participation in this survey is needed. Please have the appropriate personnel in your jurisdiction complete it. Failure to participate may affect SB1 road maintenance funding for your community. The deadline for completing the survey is anticipated to be in mid-April 2020. (An email was sent to TTAC members about this on December 16, 2019.)

Also, for jurisdictions with NHS roads, a separate yet brief pavement condition survey is expected to be sent out for federally mandated Performance Measures 2 (PM2) in March 2020.

ATTACHMENT: Draft Survey Form is attached (similar to the 2018 survey. Do not use this form. Watch for the new form to be emailed in early February 2020)

ACTION: Information

Report for Your Agency Page 1 of! 7

Statewide Needs Assessment Online Survey Report (2018)

Agency Name:

1. CONTACT INFORMATION lc~ntact Type ·-··rsalutation·-·TNa me ______l;itle IDepartment ----- ··--·-·- _·]Address Line 1 ------·------·--1Address Line 2 ·--·--·--·-·-···--.. F:ity ·--·-1~ip- Code -·--- ...... _J_E~ail -·-·-·-·--}ho~e ---·-·--·-· I Main Contact ' Person Alternative Contact Person ...... , ...... , ...... Contact Person for Financial I Data I Alternative Contact Person for Financial Data Report for Your Agency Page 2 of 17

2. STREETS AND PAVEMENTS

2.1 Pavement Management System and Pavement Distress Survey Procedures

1. Do.~~.Y.9YL~_iency use Pavement Management System (PMS) software? v" (Go to Question la if "Yes"; Go to Question lb if "No".)

la. s.~.1.~.~t.your a_gency's_ P_~_?}oftware: V

Enter your a~~0~Y.'.~.. Y~._s_ ~oftware __~-~:!'.~ .. \.i.f.."Other" is se_l~.0:~~ above):

lb. S~l~_ct the -~~-~-~()-~yo_ur _a_gen~y d_()~S not use a PMS:

En_t_er t-~-~__r_eason your age~~- ~oes not use a P_~_S, _(if__ '_'Other" is s~~~cted above):

2. What pavement distresses do you collect for Asphalt Concrete (AC)? If you collect distresses that are not listed below, please enter in the "Other AC Distresses" box.

1) Alligator Cracking 2) Block Cracking 3) Distortions 4) Long. & Trans. Cracking 5) Patch & UtB. Cut Patch 6) Rutting/Depression 7) Weathering & Raveling

Other AC distresses your agency collects, if any:

3. 'Does your agency have Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements?

tfyes, what pavement distresses do you collect for PCC? If you collect distresses that are not listed below, please enter in the "Other PCC Distresses" bo:K.

1} Corner Break 2} Divided Slab 3) Faulting 4) Linear Cracking S) Patching & Utility Cuts 6) Scaling/Map Cracking/Crazing 7) Spalling

Other PCC distresses your agency collects, if any: Report for Your Agency Page 3 of 17

4. What other condition data do you co11ect7 Deflection Ride Quality e.g. International Roughness Index (IRI) Friction Drainage Structure/Core Complaints Pavement Age

Other condition data your agency collects, if any:

5. What is the scale of the pavement condition index/rnting used (e.g. 0-100, A-F)? Lowest possible rating(e.g. O)

Highest possible rating{e.g. 100)

6. How much will you require annually to maintain existing conditions (e.g. if your current PC! is 70, indicate the annual funding required to maintain the pavement network at 70.)

7. Any notes you would like to add regarding your pavement distress survey procedures (e.g. collected by consultant, in-house, frequency of collection, etc.), or any comments/notes you have regarding any portion of this survey/your data: r

8. Are larger/heavier vehicles {e.g. buses, refuse/recycling trucks, snow removal vehicles, etc) impacting pavement performance or your maintenance practices? Jf so, please explain the type of vehicles and how they impact performance: Report for Your Agency Page 4 of 17

2.2 Sustainable Pavement Practices

1. What sustainable pavement practices does your agency utilize?

Percentage of Does you, agency II Unit Cost Additional C Sustainable Pavement Practice Additional Costs or ut1hze? ($/sy) Saving:;::::==i [ Savings II :____I Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) in . [ [ pavements %

[ Co!d In-place Recycling (CIR) %

[ Hot In-place Recycling (HIPR) %

[ Cold Central Plant Recycling %

[ Warm Mix Asphalt %

[ Permeable/Porous Pavements % [ FuH Depth Reclamation (FDR) I % [ Subgrade Stabilization I % [ Rubberized Asphalt Concrete (RAC) I % Pavement Preservation Strategies e.g. chip seals, [ fog seals, microsuriacing, cape seals % [ Other (please explain below) I %

if "Other" is used in the above tabte.t..E_lease describe below:

2. Will you continue applying sustainable pavement practices?

3. lf you do not employ sustainable practices, please indicate the reason(s} why (check all that apply): 1) High construction cost 2) Lack of knowledge 3) No local contractors 4) No street/road candidates 5) Other (p!e·ase explain below)

4 .. 0ther comments regarding sustainable pavement practices: Report for Your Agency Page 5 of 17

2.3 Inventory and condition Information

Functional Class/Road Type 1•::,~:,~:t ------:::~:.!?•~;~,~~Ion 1~nte, Line MIies ·1=1ies ...... ·.·.·..... ].... A... rea(sq. yd.) --- ...... }cc (as% of the area)······---·-····------·-

Urban Major Roads Urban Residential/Local Roads . I. Rural Major Roads Rural Residential/Local Roads , ...... Unpaved Roads T Report for Your Agency Page 6 of 17

2.4 Pavement Treatment Policy and Unit Costs

Urban Major Roads: E~ementTreatment ------Do Noth;ng ------_ IPCI Rang;O-- lOO ------fUnit Cost ($/sq. yd.)------

Preventive Mainten~~~.': .. \.':.:~: ... ~.l-~-~ry:,w: ..h_ip sea!, cape J- 70 - 69 _J , Thin overlay (e.g. less than or equal to 2 inches) SO - 6~1 1 t _ J...... _.!~.(~.~ .. ?-~:~!.~Y Je.: ..~- _more than 2_ i~E~.':~L .l .....,...... ~? _- 49 __ ,.... ,.I·· .. Reconstruction {e.g. remove & replace) O - 24 I------______]______------

Urban Residential/local Roads: vement Treatment ------Do Nothing------. ------PCI Rang:O . IQ,D ______- __ r_"____ -_-_nlt Cost ($/sq: yd:) . -- -... ------··-1

slurrv_, .. ~~-i_!: ..s~~~'.,.:~P .. ~--~-~-~1} ___ L 70-89 ..... J., I Thin overla--y____ i_e__ ·• ____ '_e_"_ t-h- '_"_.. _.~r equal- t-o- _,______'__ "_'_ hes) _J_ 50 - 69 t. _ l Thick_~v~!(~Y.{~:~_·_r:1:ore than 2_i~~he_~l. J. 25 -49 _l Reconstruction (e.g. remove & replace) I O - 24 I L ------

Rl)ral Major Roads: ------1 e::nt Treatment -----~------::h;ng_ -- . _------· ,;,,~;n~::~::· Unit Cost {$/sq. yd.)

· Preventive Maintenan.c~Je.'.g: .slu.r_rv., chip _seal,_cap_~.~.~al). .1 70- 89 Thin overlay {e.g:ie;~ ~;,·~~··~;·~;-~~I to 2 in~hes\ .,,_,. f 50- 69 ··-·-· ------',, _____ ,.__ Thick ~~~-~1~x:tii'.":~·?·;~·th'~~·2 inc_~,~~).'"' _: _____ . ,,_ -. '" .L. "" 25 - 4SI Reconstruction {e.g. remove_& replace) ·····-·------·--·--·---·------·-----·-· 0 .-.24·---··--- 1..------·------·-·------~-----·-·---··--·--·- ·········------l______1... ------·--·-----·------·---·-·-·------·-·-·---·--'

Rural Residential/Local Roads: ------·-r·------Pavement Treatment PCI Range Unit Cost ($/sq. yd.) ______D_o Nothing 90-100 I Preventive Maintenance (e.g. slurry, chip seal, cape seal) 70-89 50-69 1· - Th;n ------;~::1:::;:;'t:~•t:;f~::~~;;,~::ts) 25 - 49 [______. ----·---·----·--·-·-·----·-·-- Reco·~·~t;C~ti~~ (e.g. _remove & r~p·;~~~l .. _·- .. ·----··--·---·--··------· .. --_ 0-24 Report for Your Agency Page 7 of 17

2.5 Complete Streets Policy

1. Has your agency adopted a "Complete Streets Polley"? If your answer is "No" or "Don't know", skip this section. Please explain below why not if known. ~------==i 2. What complete streets elements are included or assumed in the policy? Check all that apply.

Bicycle facilities Pedestrian facilities I] Landscaping Medians lighting r11 Roundabouts Traffic Calming e.g. reducing !ane widths Signs i:I Curb Ramps Transit elements

Comments£Additional items:

3. Do you have other plans that incorporate these elements even if you do not have a Complete Streets policy? [==1

4. What percentage of roads will have Complete Streets elements? (e.g. enter 10 for 10%)

5. What is the estimated average incremental costs to provide Complete Street enhancements ($/sq. yd) i.e. in addition to conventional costs?

$ /sq. yd

6. Do Y(}U have .. ~ ... ~~.P~~.~.~-~.!.~!i_ve project that included Com~.l_i:!.~ .. ~.!.~~~.~.t~ .. ~1 ..E!ments that was r~~~~.~.ly constructed? If yes, please provide a brief description.

7. q()_,Y(}_U antici_pa_te_ m.c:i.~.E:! ...<:l! ..!~.~~~ .. P-~().i.~.~~ ...i..~ ... ~.~-E:!...f~.~-~rf!_? If so, _a_pproxima_t~_IY..~.9-~ ... ~.~ny? Report for Your Agency Page 8 of 17

8. What are the major challenges you face in implementing a Complete Streets Policy? Check all that apply.

Insufficient right-of-way Trees/environmental features Existing structures Insufficient funding g~ Other {please explain) IE~

If "Other" is checked, _pl_~ase describe below: ,,,

9. Other comments or notes _you_ would like to add reg_ardin~---~.?_mplete Streets: Report for Your Agency Page 9 of 17

3. SAFETY, TRAFFIC ANO REGULATORY COMPONENTS (as related to the road network)

Category --·-·------_T~u:nn~~) ---- _junitl~::;' Replacement-}ccu,acy

Storm Drains - pipelines mlle ------Other elements e.g. manholes, inlets,. ~.~.1~~.'..t~!. pump stations etc ea Curb and gutter ft ------sq_ Pedestrian facilities: Sidewalk (public) ft 5% of total non-pavement asset costs e.g. heavy equipment, corporation yards etc. Note: Do NOT ea ·------···--·-----·-··--·--·-·-·----·---···---··------·------include bridges (handled sep_arately) -· .... ------·-····-·-·--·-· .. ·-·------·----··-·--··--·------·------·---·- ___ , -----·· '·-·-·-----.,-·--·---·--·---·-·------Report for Your Agency Page 10 of 17

4. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS q_l?_~_s__y9ur _agency have additional regulatory requirements such as Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements or Traffic Sign Retro reflectivity? V

If you answered "Yes" above, please fill outthe table at the bottom of this page. Otherwise, skip this section.

May we contact you if we have follow-up questions?

Aqditiona! comments regarding "Additional Regulatory Requirements":

l;;gulatory Requirements Ioo you track costs separately? ]estimated 10-Year Needs I~~~i-~-~-~-~-~---~0-Year Expenditures Accuracy

. . -,--,.---·-----·------·-··-·-·-·------·--·-·-·-·--·-----··----···...,__·--·--·····-·-·-·--·--·--·------·------·-·---·-·------·----·------·-·-·--- Report for Your Agency Page 11 of 17

5. FUNDING AND EXPENDITURE DATA

5.1 Actual/Estimated Revenues for Pavement-Related Activities

und;ng Source Type Amount {FY16/17) Amount (FY17/18) 1 Annual Average (FYlS/19 to 27 /28) r-·------·-·-··--·----·-·---·------·----·-·----·-·-·-· '------·······------·-··--·---·------·-·-·-··

5.2 Actual/Estimated Revenues for Safety, Traffic & Regulatory Components ------_·1·------,.------··1 Annual Average (FY18/19 to 27/28) rund;ng Source ------_____ !Type __ [Amount (FY16/17) _____ ]Amount (FY17/18) - -

______i ·-·-···--·-·-·--·------,-·------·-·-·------·---·-·--··------··--·-- Report for Your Agency Page 12 of 17

5.3 Expenditures on Pavements r~;-~~----·-·- --- -·------·--··-·------·····--·-··---·-·------·------·-----TAmount (FY16/17) lAmount (FY17 /18) _. j_~-~-~-~-~1-Av~rage (FYlS/:19 to 27 /28)·-· Preventive Maintenance e.g. crack seals, slurry seals etc

...... Rehabilitation & reconstruction e'.g._ ?.V.~~1-~X~ .. Other (pavement reli:1ted) Oth_~E,~-~-~!_r_,o_n.:_~ Ma~~-t_e_n_a_n::_~~9-~-=?.~.~=-~-:!:..t_r:_~-~~e_d_e_.g_. _':~~.!~~:ion, _<:l:_~~~~g-~~!~:~sw~:E_~~!--~~-~~~~s~_s_;g_n_s_,e_t_c_.) L,, __ ---·---- i ·----·-····- . ------·----·------·-

Of the totals reported above, what percentages are due to "Sustainable Pavement Practices", "Complete streets Policy" and "Additional Regulatory Requirements"? Enter in table below .

Name .,,.,,*~~ --hS

Sustainable Pavement Practices

Comp.l~_te Street~.E?.~.P..?.~.:.. ~-~~ .. Additional Regulatory Requirements 11 '"ONNS"'WnN,'NN•' ••,,, U.,, ,·.. ,rn,~~N<,e'"s~•;• ,, w "'"ONNNN"'" ,,_ ,, ,"~NNWN"''" ,,_,v;~w'"°'""'""''°"ruN~0-"'rn, '<''"n''"''°"'° \~,w,-~NW~,Cs•-n«,<»o· °'''~~NeONS"'W ,

5.4 Expenditures on Safety, Traffic & Regulatory Components r~:me______-·-· ---·------·------·------) Average (FV18/19.to- -- ·· 1t.~:::;,7 Jt.~:;;";•l. J;;;;/ Storm Drains - pipelines ...... o .....' ...h ....e ..r. elemE!~ts e.g. manholes,_ in!e~~!... ~.~-~verts, pump stations etc Curb and gutter Pedestrian facilities: Sidewalk (public) 01 he ~F~.?-~.5..~_r,i_~_~.f~.~i-~ ities, e.g. over -crossings • Bicycle facilities: Class I bicycle path ...... :... :,::.r ..,:.ci,.lities, e.g. bike shelters/lockers, etc ...... c .... "..... r ... b .. ramps Traffic signals Street Lights So_~_n_9"·~-~-l_l~(~etaining walls Traffic signs Tunnels Other physical assets or expenditures that constitute >5% of total non-pavement asset costs e.g. heavy equipment, corporation yards etc. Note: Do iNOT include bridges (ha nd!ed separately)

Of the above total expenditures, what percentages are due to a "Complete Streets Policy"? ,,.,,,~~-""""' .. , .. ,.. · Name I!% of Amount . I%_,- ,, ' ..... 11% of Annual Average {FY~-8/1~-~~--;; /28) ·;;,;;; , Complete Streets Components Report for Your Agency Page 14 of 17

5.5 Financial Questions

1. What innovative methods is your agency doing to "stretch" the dollar? e.g. new technologies, use of recycling techniques, partnering with other agencies for lower bids, preventive maintenance, etc. ______!

2. Are there new revenues sources that your agency is considering?

3. Is there a city/county wide sales tax solely for transportation?

4. ts there a city/county wide sales tax that is partially used for transportation?

5. If you answered "Yes" above, please describe how it is used. {e.g. local match for highways, local streets & roads only, transit, etc). Report for Your Agency Page 15 of 17

6. NON-HIGHWAY NHS ROADS Thr lali1 ~1fow U1l1 lh1 mm·hlghwaJ NHl rw4s in 1011raQNKJ as fulM in i11///dJI ca a11·.lhin1i/.'\wITlnh~hlI~ r~m ~rn1il!1 illlf addiliom1lillfOl!llalfiln 1ou m

Area IPostedSpeedlimitl IRI PSR PCI Js rf T jRuttingjFaultingj Street From (sf) 1. Jcrackingl Comments 1 (mile/hour) (In/mile) I (1·5) {%} (0-100) u ace ype I (in) (in) I; CJ CJ,1[':~:]''[:J,:C::] c::vJJ )111] ,.c.--,

!f you have this information in an Excel fife, you may upload it instead of filling out this table Bi-owse'.." ... ~

7. Training and Technical Needs (Optional)

Purpose and summary of questions

This voluntary survey asks for your input regarding what you see as your agency's needs for pavement-related training and other forms of technical support, and some specific questions about your agency's pavement management, design, construction and maintenance practices. Your answers to these questions will be used to set the priorities and direction for the training, support and research program of the recently formed City and County Pavement lmprovem,~nt Center.

The questions will require knowledge of technical issues. The questions are grouped by expertise area. The questions only require knowledge of needs and practices, and none of the questions require data or other de1·ailed information.

Please answer as many questions as possible, even partial input wifl be very helpful.

Question 1: Needs and priorities

Who should answer: technical staff in charge of pavements, may require asking across different departments involved with pavements.

Ql: Please fill in the top four areas for which your agency could use training, technical support, pilot implementation support, technical guidance, example specifications or research and development regarding maintaining your road network? For each issue indicate what type of support you are looking for. Report for Your Agency Page 16 of 17

'-1==0-==•I= 2.1===-===i 3.l======i 4.

Questions 2 through 7: Pavement management practices

Q2: Does your agency apply maintenance (preservation) treatments prior to the appearance of extensive distress on the pavement surface as a standard practice?

Q3: Does your agency select treatments primarily based.o.n ~avement Condition Index (PC!)?~ Other criteria for selecting treatments? [.,__ .... - ...... -...... 1

Q4a: For asphalt surfaced pavements that handle heavy traffic (buses, trucks) other than garbage trucks what is the typical preservation or maintenance treatment that you would use for each of these cases? If heavily crackedC... ---·-····-·-··-·.. -==:} If moderately cracked[------w:J If no cracking but showing signs of aging L_· _____ ·· ·_· · ·J

Q4b: How many preservation or maintenance treatments do you typically do before you do a rehabilitation? (fill in number)'------'

dsa: For your asphalt surfaced pavements that do n<;!l handle heavy vehide traffic other than garbage trucks what is the typical preservation or maintenance treatment that you would use for each of these cases? lf heavily cracked c=:=-~:J 1f moderately cracked -==]

!f no cracking but showing signs of aging L __ ," ___ w _____ l

QSb: How many preservation or maintenance treatments do you typically do before you do a rehabilitation (fill in ""m>•••'"'------·1 ~------· .,_, __ ,, .. Q6: Does your agency routinely consider use of recycling treatments for your asphalt pavements such as cold in-place recycling {CIR), Cold Central Plant Recycling {CCPR), subgrade stabilization or full depth reclamationjfDR1J.!l1Q.!:ir treatment selection process for pavements with extensive cracking? ~ Comments~------:J

Q7: Has your agency done life cycle cost analysis {LCCA) to evaluate the timing and selection of your preservation, maintenance and rehabilitation treatments included in your PMS decision trees? [ 9 Comments!______=:]

Questions 8 through 15: Pavement materials and construction specifications

\,\/ho should answer: technical staff in charge of pavement materials and construction quality management.

Q8: Does your agency allow supplementary cementitious materials to replace cement in your concrete for pavement, gutters and sidewalks?

Q9: Does your typical specification include a required minimum cement content in your concrete for pavement, gutters and sidewalks? Report for Your Agency Page 17 of 17

:omments ~==:====::::::' ...... 10: Does your typical specification language require measurement of density on compacted asphalt in the field using cores or calibrated nuclear gauges~==--=~ ;ommentsL_____ J

Who does your agency use to monitor asphalt compaction in the field?

Does your agency assess penalties on the contractor for poor asphalt compaction based on measured in place densities?- .------L v .ommentsL...... J

13: Does your agency offer any incentives for contra,:tors to meet or exceed the asphalt compaction standard?l__, ______...... VJ :omments c= ·.··.- ...... -.. ,.."_j

Q14: How would you rate your agency satisfaction that adequate asphalt compaction is being achieved? Le;:·;;;::::;:==='

15: Do you allow the use of recyded asphalt pavement (RAP) in your asphalt mixes? "······-··--···········- fYes, maximum percentage? r-·_" __ ·=:J % omments L,.., .... '"·---·········· .. ·-··-J

Report for Your Agency Page 12 of 19

4. BRIDGE DATA

4.1 Local Agency Owned/Maintained Bridges (LAB's)

1. Total Number of LAB's within/ not within the National Bridge Inventory (NBI):

Number of LAB's within the NBI Number of LAB's NOT within the NBI

2. Number of LAB's by maintenance expenditures in last two years:

Maintenance Expenditures per Bridge in Last Two Years

None 1000/Bridge II >=$1000/Bridge T!j ?Ff Number of LAB's ;;,£ J~ift II

3. Number of LAB's posted for live load restriction:

4. Has Ag~n~y developed a Scour Mitigation Plan of Action (POA) for LAB's?

5. If so, number of LAB's that the Agency has completed Scour Mitigation POA's over last 5 years:

6. Has Agency submitted Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Plan to Caltrans for review/ approval?

4.2 Short Span Vehicular Bridges (SSB's)

1. Total Number of SSB's Report for Your Agency Page 13 of 19

4.3. Non-Vehicular Bridges (NVB's)

1. Total Number of NVB's

2. Number of NVB's by Maintenance Expenditures in last two years

Maintenance Expenditures per Bridge in Last Two Years

None <$1000/Bridge >=$1000/Bridge 11 1111 1111 11 i$ Number of NVB's II II II I

4.4 Low Water Crossings (LWC's)

Number of LWC's replaced over Total Number of LWC's that Total Number of LWC's last 5 years should be replaced with bridges

II II

IV.Q

TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Joseph Stramaglia, Regional Planner – Project Delivery Team Lead

SUBJECT: TPPC CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: IV Q 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT UPDATE

DESCRIPTION:

Development of the Kern Council of Governments 2022 Regional Transportation Plan requires the review and update of the Capital Improvement Program. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

The Kern Council of Governments is in the beginning stages of developing the 2022 Regional Transportation Plan (2022 RTP). The 24-year planning horizon is tentatively set for 2022 through 2046. The action element for the Plan includes a multi-modal transportation project listing, or Capital Improvement Program developed in two parts: the financially constrained list (Table 5.1) and the financially unconstrained list (Table 5.2). The multi-modal Table 5.1 Capital Improvement Program is more restrictive because these projects are financially constrained for purposes of the 2022 RTP and must be identified in the Air Quality Conformity document for any type of proposed road capacity work. Improvements in Table 5.2 are not part of conformity analysis because they are not financially constrained.

The Capital Improvement Program was sent through the TTAC last September and October to request updates from member agency staff. Kern COG staff has now completed the draft update based on comments received in November and December. Staff is now circulating the information one more time. Final comments should be sent to Kern COG staff no later than February 21, 2020, or sooner if possible. We will request approval by the Kern COG Board of Directors at the March 19, 2020 meeting to move forward and begin updating the air quality conformity model.

Action: Information.

Attachment: Final Draft 2022 RTP Master CIP and Financial Element DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program 2022 through 2046 - Transit & Other Project Location Scope YOE Cost Vanpool Countywide Vanpools - build and maintaine fleet of 500 Vans by 2040 48,000,000 Park and Ride Various Park and Ride Lots (1,500 spaces) 6,000,000 Bus Service Metro Bkd Full size alternative fuel buses 232,500,000 Full size alternative fuel buses - 120 replacement buses Full size alternative fuel buses - Fixed Routes - 130 new buses Full size alternative fuel buses - Bus Rapid Transit - 24 new buses Full size alternative fuel buses - Express Service - 36 new buses Bus Service Countywide Full, midsize and mini-van size alternative fuel buses 34,700,000 Full size alternative fuel buses - Express Service - 10 new buses Midsize alternative fuel buses - 120 replacement buses Midsize alternative fuel buses - 120 new buses Mini van / buses - 45 replacement buses Bus Service Metro Bkd 2 Transit Maintenance Stations 60,000,000 Bus Service Metro Bkfd 3 transfer stations 15,000,000 ITS Countywide ITS related improvements / upgrades 3,000,000 Aviation Countywide Capital, Maintenance and Operational Improvements 48,000,000 Passenger Rail Rosamond Metrolink extension - Palmdale/Lancaster to Rosamond 112,000,000 Passenger Rail Bakersfield Amtrak Station - Phase II 13,000,000 Passenger Rail Bakersfield High Speed Rail Station - Bakersfield 50,000,000 Passenger Rail Region High Speed Rail Alignment and Facilities Fresno to Bakersfield 1,000,000,000 Passenger Rail Shafter/Wasco High Speed Rail Heavy Maintenance Facility 450,000,000 Sub-total $2,072,200,000

2022 through 2046 - Highway Operational Improvements

Project Location Scope YOE Cost HOV Lanes Bakersfield Various State Routes - HOV lanes 149,000,000 Westside Parkway - Heath Road and Stockdale Highway to SR 58 at Fairfax State Route 178 - Existing west freeway terminus to Oswell Street HOV Ramps Bakersfield Install HOV Ramps and metering improvements at various locations 148,000,000 SR 99 Interchange at Snow Road - HOV Ramp Metering 6,434,783 SR 99 Interchange at Olive Drive - HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at Rosedale Hwy - HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at California Ave - HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at Ming Ave- HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at White Lane- HOV Ramp Metering

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 1 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Highway Operational Improvements (Continued)

Project Location Scope YOE Cost SR 99 Interchange at Panama Lane- HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at SR 119 - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Oak Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at H-Chester Ave - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Union Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Cottonwood Road - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Mount Vernon - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Oswell Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Fairfax Road - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Weedpatch Hwy - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at SR 204 - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at Beale Avenue - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at Haley Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at Mount Vernon Street - NOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at Oswell Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at Fairfax Road - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at Morning Drive - HOV Ramp Metering West Beltway Interchange at 7th Standard Road - HOV Ramp Metering West Beltway Interchange at Olive Drive - HOV Ramp Metering West Beltway Interchange at Rosedale Hwy - HOV Ramp Metering West Beltway Interchange at Stockdale Hwy - HOV Ramp Metering West Beltway Interchange at Ming Avenue - HOV Ramp Metering West Beltway Interchange at White Lane - HOV Ramp Metering West Beltway Interchange at SR 119 - HOV Ramp Metering

Sub-total $297,000,000 *the Passenger Rail Program is partially funded through the High Speed Rail Authority and is provided as information. The funding summary includes a portion of $5 billion of the constrained revenue estimates for work expected between Fresno County and Kern County. The constrained amount of $1.5 Billion is for work in the Kern region. The remaining $13 billion is unconstrained for work in the Kern Region and is reflected in Table 4.2. $26 Billion is the current cost estimate.

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 2 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Various locations Countywide Construct Class I, II or Class IIII Bike Path; striping; signage $85,500,000 Arvin Main Street from Panama Road to Di Giorgio Road- 1 Mile - Class II Arvin E Bear Mountain Blvd from S Comanche Drive to Weedpatch Hwy - 4.1 miles Bakersfield Incorporated Baker Street from Bernard Street to California Avenue - 1.57 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Potomac Avenue from S. King Street to Monticello Avenue - 0.82 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated River Bike Trail Connection from Kern River Parkway to Elm Street - 0.26 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Baker Street from California Avenue to S. King Street - 0.35 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated E. Pacheco Road from Hughes Lane to Cottonwood Road - 2.52 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Belle Terrace from Stine Road to Madison Street - 3.04 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Pin Oak Boulevard from Bear Creek Road to District Boulevard - 1.14 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Ewoldsen Class III Route from Oak Grove Street to N. Half Moon Drive - 1.43 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Harris Road from Ashe Road to Akers Road - 1.51 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Harris Road from Ashe Road to Wible Road - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Hughes Lane from Ming Ave to E. Pacheco Road - 1.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Harris Road from S. Allen Road to Ashe Road - 4.08 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Haley Street from Panorama Drive to Columbus Street - 0.87 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated E. Pacheco Road from Gasoline Alley to Monitor Street - 1.33 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Akers Road from Wilson Rd to McKee - 3.99 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Arvin-Edison Canal Path from Stockdale Highway to Cottonwood Road - 9.54 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated 17th Street from A Street to Truxtun Avenue - 1.26 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated M Street from 30th Street to 17th Street - 0.85 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Sillect Avenue from Buck Owens Boulevard to Kern River Parkway - 1.33 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated H Street Canal Path from Railroad Bridge to Highway 99 - 7.97 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Friant-Kern Canal from Seventh Standard Road to Kern River - 6.1 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Beale Avenue from Grace Street to 21st Street - 1 mile - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Q Street from Columbus Street to Highway 178 - 1.12 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Haggin Oaks Blvd from Camino Media to Limoges Way - 0.74 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Kentucky Street from Alta Vista Drive to Mt. Vernon Avenue - 1.81 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Flower Street from Alta Vista Drive to Owens Street - 0.64 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated S, King Street from California Avenue to Brundage Lane - 1 mile - Class III

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 3 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield Incorporated 4th Street from Union Avenue to City Limits - 1.25 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Watts Drive from Cottonwood Road to Madison Street - 0.5 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Brundage Lane from Union Avenue to Oswell Street - 5.08 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Niles Street from Alta Vista Drive to Virginia Street - 1.28 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Bernard Street from Chester Avenue to Mt. Vernon Avenue - 2.95 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Berkshire Road from Stine Road to Santana Sun Drive - 1.5 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated 21st Street from King Street to Washington Street - 0.89 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated 178 Overcrossing from Height Street to Mirador Drive - 0.1 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Laurelglen Boulevard from Pin Oak Park Boulevard to Gosford Road - 0.48 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Mountain Oak - McInnes Rt from Park Path to McInnes - Westwold Path - 0.59 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated 22nd Street from Elm Street to F Street - 0.72 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Christmas Tree Lane from Mt Vernon Avenue to Panorama Drive - 1.65 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Madison Street from Belle Terrace to White Ln - 1 mile - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Park Path from Mountain Oak Road to Broad Oak Avenue - 0.19 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Wible Road from Planz Road to Taft Highway - 4 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Pacific Street from Union Avenue to Alta Vista Drive - 0.36 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Chinon - Limoges Route from McInnes Boulevard to Haggin Oaks Boulevard - 0.37 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Maywood - Charger Route from Oswell Street to Piper Way - 1.85 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated McInnes - Westwold Path from McInnes Boulevard to Westwold Drive - 0.08 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Riverlakes Drive from Olive Drive to Coffee Road - 1.57 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Stine Road from Panama Lane to Taft Highway - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Noriega Road from Renfro Rd to Calloway Drive - 2.01 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Marella Class III from Garnsey Avenue to Montclair Street - 0.55 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Marella Way from California Avenue to Montclair Street - 1 mile - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Hosking Avenue from Wible Rd to Cottonwood Road - 3.03 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated P Street from Brundage Lane to Belle Terrace - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Sundale Avenue from La Puente Drive to New Stine Road - 0.91 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Palm Street from Real Road to P Street - 1.79 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Verdugo Lane from Olive Drive to Hagaman Road - 1.22 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated A St/Hughes Ln from California Ave to Terrace Way - 1.26 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Raider Drive from Planz Road to Merrimac Avenue - 0.25 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated University Avenue from Haley Street to River Boulevard - 0.58 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Quailwood - Quailridge from Truxtun Avenue to Stockdale Highway - 1.02 miles - Class III

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 4 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield Incorporated School House Road from Ming Ave to Ashe Road - 1.33 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated 18th St - 19th St Route from 21st Street to 17th Street - 1.01 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Calloway Drive from Snow Road to Norris Road - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Panama Lane from H Street to Cottonwood Road - 2.03 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Broad Oak - Oak Grove Rt from Park Path to Westwold Drive - 0.2 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Ridge Oak Drive from Rose Petal Street to Mountain Oak Road - 0.42 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Harris Rd-Gasoline Alley from Wible Road to Pacheco Road - 0.7 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated White Lane from Dovewood Street to Hughes Lane - 1.22 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Morning Drive from Auburn Street to Willis Avenue - 1.38 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Snow Road from Allen Road to Verdugo Lane - 1.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Clay Patrick Farr Way from Hageman Road to Granite Falls Dr - 0.83 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Buena Vista Canal Path from Ming Ave to Taft Hwy - 8.29 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Merrimac Avenue from Raider Drive to Monitor Street - 0.06 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Monitor Street from Merrimac Avenue to White Lane - 0.25 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Spring Creek Loop from Wilderness Drive to Reliance Drive - 1.03 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Mountain Vista Drive from Grand Lakes Avenue to Berkshire Road - 2.73 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Half Moon Drive from Ashe Rd to Ashe Rd - 1.15 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Bakersfield Commons Conn. from Coffee Road to Friant-Kern Canal - 0.44 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Madison Street from Brundage Lane to Belle Terrace - 0.49 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Jewetta Avenue from Palm Avenue to Brimhall Road - 0.5 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated University Avenue from Columbus Street to Panorama Drive - 0.68 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Coffee Road Path Widening from Truxtun Avenue to Kern River Parkway - 0.06 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Gosford Road from Harris Road to Taft Highway - 2.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Comanche Drive from City Limit to Highway 178 - 0.16 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Campus Park from Buena Vista Road to Old River Road - 1.06 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Patton Way from Weldon Avenue to Hageman Road - 0.28 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Morning Drive from Paladino Drive to Morningstar Avenue - 0.8 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Auburn Street from Morning Drive to Fairfax Road - 0.92 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Highway 178 from City Limits to Masterson Street - 6.6 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Allen Road from Ming Avenue to White Lane - 1.52 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Olive Drive from Santa Fe Way to Allen Road - 1.52 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Claymore Extension from Eissler Street to Piper Way - 0.11 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Paladino Drive from Rivani Drive to Grand Canyon Drive - 1.87 miles - Class II

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 5 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield Incorporated Kern Canyon Road from Masterson Street to Morning Drive - 2.66 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated North Rosedale Park Path from Campfire Drive to Jewetta Avenue - 0.18 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Jewette Avenue from Bernard Street to 30th Street - 0.27 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Jewetta Avenue from Columbus Street to Bernard Street - 0.52 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated 36th Street from Chester Avenue to San Dimas Path - 0.59 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated La France Drive from Castro Lane to El Toro Drive - 1.03 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Park/Blanch/11th/10th Route from Oak Street to Union Ave - 1.08 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Bank Street 2nd Street Ro from Oak Street to S. P Street - 1.59 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated White Lane from Union Street to Cottonwood Road - 0.99 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Ming Avenue from Oak Street to Union Avenue - 2.03 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated McKee Rd from Ashe Rd to SH 99 - 2.76 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Polo Drive from Dapple Avenue to Meadow Creek Street - 0.26 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Wilderness Drive from Harris Road to Reliance Drive - 0.54 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Garnsey Avenue from Garnsey Lane to Stockdale Highway - 0.57 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Height Street from River Boulevard to 178 Overcrossing - 0.75 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated W. Jeffrey Street from Overcrossing to River Boulevard - 1.1 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Grand Lakes Avenue from Rossilyn Lane to Brandy Rose Street - 1.83 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Almondale Pk Shared Path from Meadow Creek Street to Verdugo Lane - 0.14 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated San Dimas Path from 36th Street to Jeffrey Street - 0.43 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated China Grade Loop from City Limit to Panorama Drive - 0.11 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Half Moon Drive from Ashe Road to Ashe Road - 0.96 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Hughes Lane from E Pacheco Rd to Fairview Road - 1 mile - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Coventry - Benton Route from Ming Avenue to Oak Street - 1.4 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Noble Avenue Route from River Boulevard to Columbus Street - 2.3 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Old Farm Road from Snow Road to Hageman Road - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Buena Vista Road from Panama Lane to Highway 119 - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Mt. Vernon Avenue from Panorama Drive to Flower Street - 2.19 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Old River Road from Harris Road to Taft Highway - 2.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Emerald Cove Park Path from Vaquero Avenue to Hageman Road - 0.23 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Polo Park Shared Path from Old Farm Road to Grazing Avenue - 0.37 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated 21st St from Oak St to Westwind Dr - 0.13 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Panama Lane from Dennen Street to Colony Street - 0.33 miles - Class II

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 6 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield Incorporated Berkshire Road from Colony Street to Madison Street - 1.81 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Fairview Road from Hughes Lane to Cottonwood Road - 2.53 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated 21st St from Westwind Dr to Kern River Bike Path - 0.06 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Hosking Avenue from Wible Rd to Gosford Rd - 2.99 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Verdugo Lane from Seventh Standard Road to Snow Road - 1 mile - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Edison Road from Highway 178 to End of Street - 1.15 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Patton Way from Weldon Avenue to Hageman Road - 0.28 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Rudd Avenue from Seventh Standard Road to Santa Fe Way - 1.5 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Alfred Harrell Highway from Morning Drive Bike Path to Highway 178 - 3.32 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Oswell Street from Columbus Street to City Limits - 0.66 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Masterson Street from Highway 178 to Alfred Harrell Highway - 1.43 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated NE Bakersfield Path from Paladino Drive to Morning Drive Path - 2.7 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Columbus Path from Kern River Parkway to Columbus Street - 0.37 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Real Road from Garnsey Lane to Palm Street - 0.08 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Ridge Road from Camino Real to Mt. Vernon Avenue - 0.16 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Chippewa - Yorkshire from Jewetta Avenue to Verdugo Lane - 0.88 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Chamber Boulevard from S. Allen Road to Grand Lakes Avenue - 1.45 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Laurel Park - Wrangler from Bay Meadows Lane to Calloway Drive - 1.83 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Iron Creek Goose Creek CT from Allen Road to Coffee Road - 3.66 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Wenatchee Avenue from Panorama Drive to Columbus Street - 1.02 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Ashe Road from Panama Lane to Taft Highway - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Alfred Harrell Highway from City Limit to Panorama Drive - 0.1 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Toluca Drive Route from Renfro Road to Allen Road - 1.48 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Panama Lane from Mountain Vista Road to Gosford Road - 1.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Overcrossing from Willow Drive to Rio Mirada - 0.17 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Allen Road from Pensinger Road to Highway 119 - 2.75 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Mohawk Street from Hageman Road to Rosedale Highway - 1.26 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Panama Lane from Interstate 5 to Gosford Road - 2.02 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Camino Grande from Alfred Harrell to NE Bakersfield Path - 1.29 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Patton Way Shared Path from Weldon Avenue to Hageman Road - 0.27 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Appletree - Hahn Route from Wilson Road to Wible Road - 1.8 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Cottonwood Road from Casa Loma Drive to E. Panama Lane - 3 miles - Class III

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 7 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield Incorporated S. H Street from Panama Lane to Taft Highway - 2 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Greenwich - Balvanera from Verdugo Lane to Calloway Road - 0.55 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Arvin-Edison Canal Path from Cottonwood Road to Fairfax Road - 3.77 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Sage Drive from Half Moon Bay Drive to Wilson Road - 0.2 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Stellar Avenue from Old Farm Road to Campfire Drive - 0.34 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Westholme Boulevard from Ming Avenue to Wilson Road - 0.4 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated El Capitan Bike Route from Noriega Road to Polo Park Path - 0.44 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Allegheny Court from Old Walker Pass Road to Rivers Edge Park - 0.44 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Olympia Drive from S. Laurel Glen Boulevard to Half Moon Bay Drive - 0.49 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Old Walker Pass Road from Comanche Drive to Rancheria Road - 1.46 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Knudsen Drive from Olive Drive to Hageman Road - 0.47 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Brimhall Road from Renfro Road to Allen Road - 1.01 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Santa Fe Way from 7th Stnard Road to Hageman Road - 4.14 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Rail ROW Path from 7th Standard Road to E. Norris Road - 2.23 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Kahala - Constitution Rou from Hawaii Lane to Jewetta Avenue - 1.34 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Mezzadro/Alderbrk/Lavina from Allen Road to Allen Road - 3.63 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Panorama Class I Connecti from Kern River Parkway to Panorama Drive - 0.06 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Mountain Ridge Rd from Panama Ln to Taft Hwy - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Reina Road from Renfro Road to Verdugo Lane - 2.04 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Calloway Shared Path from Balvanera Drive to Noriega Road - 0.28 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Yarnell Bike Route from Paul Avenue to Calloway Drive - 0.31 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Hawaii - Wailea from Allen Road to Noriega Road - 0.38 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Allen Road from Snow Road to Hageman Road - 1.89 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Mountain Park Dr from Kern River Parkway to River Run Boulevard - 0.18 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Rose Petal Street from Brandy Rose Street to Ridge Oak Drive - 0.2 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated River Run Boulevard from Ming Avenue to Buena Vista Road - 0.93 miles - Class III Bakersfield Incorporated Truxtun Shared Path link from Coffee Road to Quailridge Road - 0.15 miles - Class I Bakersfield Incorporated Panama Lane from Interstate 5 to Gosford Road - 2.02 miles - Class II Bakersfield Incorporated Various Feasibility Studies for Other Bike and Pedestrian Related Improvements Bakersfield County Area Union Avenue from Panama Road to Bear Mountain Blvd - 4 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Santa Fe Way from Driver Road to Riverside Street - 3.6 miles - Class II

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 8 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield County Area Rudd Avenue from Palm Avenue to Brimhall Road - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Roberts Lane from Norris Road to Washington Avenue - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Roberts Lane from Washington Avenue to Standford Drive - 0.7 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area River Blvd from Panorama Drive to Bernard Street - 1.3 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Pioneer Drive from Oswell Steet to Morning Drive - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Pegasus Road from Merle Haggard Drive to Norris Road - 1.8 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Patton Way from Snow Road to Hageman Road - 1.8 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Panama Road from Weedpatch Hwy to S Comanche Drive - 4 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Palm Avenue from Heath Road to Renfro Road - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Palm Ave (Country Breeze & Slikker Drive) from Old Farm Road to Country Breeze Place - 1.7 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Old River Road from Taft Hwy to Shafter Road - 3 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Old Farm Road from Palm Avenue to Brimhall Road - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Old Farm Road from Good Place to Rosedale Hwy - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Norris Road from Snow Road to Roberts Lane - 0.7 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Nord Avenue from Kratzmeyer Road to Stockdale Hwy - 4.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Niles Street from Virginia Street to Morning Drive - 3.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Muller Road from S Owell Street to Weedpatch Hwy - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Merle Haggard Drive from South Granite Road to N Chester Avenue - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area McCray Street from Merle Haggard Drive to China Grade Loop - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Landco Drive from Calloway Canal to Rosedale Highway - 0.7 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Kratzmeyer Road from Santa Fe Way to Enos Lane - 4.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Knudsen Drive from Norris Road to Hageman Road - 0.9 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Hageman Road from Wegis Avenue to Nord Road - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Flower Street from Owens Street to Mt Vernon Avenue - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Enos Lane from Beech Avenue to Panama Lane - 11.3 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Decatur Street from Airport Drive to Sequoia Drive - 0.3 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Day Avenue from N Chester Avenue to Manor Street - 0.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Comanche Drive from E Panama Lane to Varsity Avenue - 5.5 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Buena Vista Blvd from S Union Avenue to S Comanche Drive - 9.1 miles - Class II

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 9 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield County Area Brimhall Road from Enos Lane to Superior Road - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Brimhall Road from Wegis Avenue to Rudd Avenue - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Brae Burn Drive from Country Club Drive to College Avenue - 0.6 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Beech Avenue from E Los Angeles to Enos Lane - 2.3 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Airport Drive from China Grade Loop to Roberts Lane - 1.3 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Olive Drive from Victor Street to SR 99 - 0.3 miles - Class III Bakersfield County Area N Chester Avenue from Existing Bike Route to Merle Haggard Drive - 0.3 miles - Class III Bakersfield County Area Rosedale Hwy from Enos Lane to Mohawk Street - 10.9 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Bakersfield County Area Woodrow Ave from Roberts Lane to N Chester Ave - 1.8 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Wilson Avenue - Castaic Ave from Roberts Lane to North Chester Avenue - 1.9 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Valencia Drive from College Ave to Pioneer Drive - 1 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Shalimar Drive from Niles Street to Pioneer Drive - 0.5 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Pesante Road from Cul-de-sac to Pioneer Drive - 1 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Jeffrey Street from Union Ave to River Blvd - 0.2 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Jeffrey Street from Loma Linda Drive to River Blvd - 0.7 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Height Street from River Blvd to Haley Street - 0.5 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Decatur Street from Sequoia Drive to Chester Ave - 0.8 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Country Club Drive - Horace Mann Ave- Pentz St from College Ave to Center St - 0.8 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Center Street/Rosewood Avenuenue from Shalimar Drive to Monica Street - 1.8 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Center Street from Oswell Steet to Pesante Road - 0.8 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Bakersfield County Area Tupman Path from Enos Lane to Moose Street - 5.6 miles Bakersfield County Area Stine Canal from Stockdale Hwy to Belle Terrace - 0.5 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Lake Evans Loop from Lake Evans to Lake Evans - 2.7 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Enos Lane Path from Panama Lane to Buena Vista Rec Area Loop - 4.5 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area East Side Canal from Kentucky Street to Fairfax Road - 2.7 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area East Side Canal from E Brundage Lane to Panama Road - 7.9 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area East Branch Canal from Belle Terrace to Casa Loma Drive - 0.7 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Cumberland Road from Bear Valley Road to Bear Valley Springs - 3.6 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Central Branch Canal from Ming Avenue to Union Avenue - 1.3 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Central Branch Canal from E Pacheco Road to Buckley Avenue - 0.8 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Central Branch Canal from E Panama Lane to Berkshire Road - 0.5 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Calloway Canal from Coffee Road to Hwy 99 - 3.8 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Buena Vista Rec Area Loop from Lake Buena Vista to Lake Buena Vista - 7.7 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Beardsley Canal from Fruitvale Avenue to Manor Street - 4 miles - Other

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 10 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized (Continued) Project Location Scope YOE Cost Bakersfield County Area Arvin-Edison Canal from S Oswell Street to Marion Avenue - 1.5 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Arvin-Edison Canal from Central Branch Canal to Mount Vernon Avenue - 1.3 miles - Other Bakersfield County Area Lake Ming Loop from Kern River Parkway to Campground Road - 2.6 miles - Class I Bakersfield County Area Airport Drive from Manor Street to W China Grade Loop - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Unknown Bike Path from Knudsen Drive to SR 99 - 0.7 miles - Class I Bakersfield County Area Unknown Bike Path from Arrow Street to May Street - 0.6 miles - Class I Bakersfield County Area Unknown Bike Path from Beardsley Avenue to Kern River Parkway - 0.5 miles - Class I Bakersfield County Area Weedpatch Hwy from SR 58 East Hwy to Panama Road - 6 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Taft Hwy from Heath Road Extension to Buena Vista Road - 3 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Standard Street from Rio Mirador Drive to Gilmore Avenue - 1.1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Panama Road from Buena Vista Road to Weedpatch Hwy - 12.1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Muller Road from Weedpatch Hwy to S Comanche Drive - 4 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Gilmore Avenue from Mohawk Street to Standard Street - 1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Fairfax Road from E Brundage Lane to Panama Road - 6 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Edison Hwy from Washington Street to S Comanche Drive - 7.8 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area E Panama Lane from Cottonwood Road to S Comanche Drive - 8.1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area E Norris Road from Roberts Lane to N Chester Avenue - 2.1 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area Cottonwood Road from E Panama Lane to Panama Road - 2 miles - Class II Bakersfield County Area S H Street from Taft Hwy to Shafter Road - 3.2 miles - Class II Bear Valley Bear Valley Road from Cumberland Road to Hwy 202 - 6.8 miles - Other County Kern River Parkway from Western end of Path to Lake Buena Vista - 2.9 miles - Class I County Sierra Hwy from Rosamond Blvd to LA County Line - 3 miles - Class II County Rosamond Blvd from 60th Street to Sierra Hwy - 4.2 miles - Class II County Kiddyland Drive from River Crossing to Alfred Harrel Hwy - 0.3 miles - Class II County SR 178 from SR 14 to Sierra Hwy - 32.3 miles - Caltrans Shoulder County SR 178 from Bakersfield City Limits to Kern River Valley - 26.4 miles - Caltrans Shoulder County SR 14 from SR 178 to Mojave - 46.6 miles - Caltrans Shoulder County 202 Hwy from Tehachapi Blvd to Bear Valley Road - 5.7 miles - Caltrans Shoulder County Weedpatch Hwy from Di Giorgio Road to E Bear Mountain Blvd - 3 miles - Class II Delano Lake Woollomes Loop from Lake Woollomes to Lake Woollomes - 5.3 miles - Class I Delano Stradley Avenue from SR 155 to Sherwood Avenue - 6 miles - Class II Delano Pond Road from Benner Avenue to Stradley Avenue - 3 miles - Class II Delano Mast Avenue from Garces Hwy to Airport Avenue - 1 miles - Class II Delano Airport Avenue from Mast Avenue to Proposed Woollomes - 2.7 miles - Class II Golden Hills Woodford Tehachapi Road from Valley Blvd to Highline Road - 1 miles - Class II Golden Hills Valley Blvd from Tucker Road to Woodford Tehachapi Road - 1.5 miles - Class II

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 11 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized (Continued) Project Location Scope YOE Cost Golden Hills SR 202 from Bear Valley Road to Woodford Tehachapi Road - 5.7 miles - Class II Golden Hills Pellisier Road from Banducci Road to Giraudo Road - 2 miles - Class II Golden Hills Old Town Road from Mariposa Road to Tehachapi Road - 0.7 miles - Class II Golden Hills Highline Road from Tucker Road to Banducci Road - 3.1 miles - Class II Golden Hills Golden Hills Blvd. from Santa Barbara Drive to Highline Road - 1.1 miles - Class II Golden Hills Giraudo Road from Pellisier Road to Bailey Road - 0.5 miles - Class II Golden Hills Cummings Valley Road from Bailey Road to Bear Valley Road - 1 miles - Class II Golden Hills Cummings Valley Road from Bailey Road to SR 202 - 0.4 miles - Class II Golden Hills Bear Valley Road from SR 202 to Proposed Road - 1.5 miles - Class II Golden Hills Banducci Road from SR 202 to Highline Road - 0.2 miles - Class II Golden Hills Banducci Road from Comanche Point Road to Pellisier Road - 2.5 miles - Class II Golden Hills Bailey Road from Giraudo Road to Cummings Valley Road - 1.5 miles - Class II Golden Hills Stallion Springs Road/Comanche Point Road from Banducci Road to Banducci Road - 3.1 miles - Other Indian Wells Brown Road from SR 14 to US 395 - 20 miles - Class III Signage Only Indian Wells Brown Road from US 395 Northern Overpass to US 395 Southern Overpass - 0.3 miles - Class III Signage Only Indian Wells Athel Avenue from Us 395 to Brown Road - 2.6 miles - Class III Signage Only Indian Wells US 395 from Brown Road to China Lake Blvd. - 10.1 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Indian Wells US 395 from Brown Road to Inyo County Line - 10.4 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Indian Wells SR 14 from Athel Avenue to SR 178 - 5.9 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Indian Wells SR 14 from US 395 to Athel Avenue - 1 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Indian Wells Brown Road from US 395 to Ridgecrest Blvd. - 8.2 miles - Pave Shoulder Indian Wells Brown Road from Athel Avenue to US 395 - 7.8 miles - Pave Shoulder Indian Wells Brown Road from US 395 Northern Overpass to US 395 Southern Overpass - 0.3 miles - Pave Shoulder Indian Wells Inyokern Road from SR 178 Ridgecrest City Limits to SR 14 - 9.2 miles - Other Inyokern Broadway from Orchard Avenue to Plains Avenue - 0.5 miles - Class II Kern River Lake Isabella Blvd from Nugget Ave to Erskine Creek Road - 2.2 miles - Class II Kern River Kelso Valley Road from SR 178 to Adams Drive - 1.8 miles - Class II Kern River Kelso Valley Rd / Kelso Valley Creek Road from SR 178 to Loops Back to SR 178 - 9.7 miles - Class III Kern River SR 178 from Kelsy Valley Creek Road to Kelso Valley Road - 1.2 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Kern River Lake Isabella Loop from Loop to - 30.1 miles - Other Kernville Kern River/Lake from Riverside Park to Wofford Heights Park - 4.3 miles - Class I Kernville Sierra Way from Valley View Drive to Cyrus Canyon Road - 2.2 miles - Class III Kernville Sirretta Street from Burlando Road to Existing Class II - 1 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 12 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized (Continued) Project Location Scope YOE Cost Kernville Burlando Road from Rio Del Loma/Whiskey Flat to Kernville Road - 2.1 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets Kernville Burlando Road from Kernville to Wofford Heights - 3 miles - Class I Lake Isabella Wofford Road Lake Isabella 2 2.0 from Burlando Road to SR 155 - 2 miles - Class II Lake Isabella McCray Road from SR 178 to Dogwood Road - 0.4 miles - Class II Lake Isabella Erskine Creek Road from Lake Isabella Blvd to Pasadena Lane - 1.4 miles - Class II Lake Isabella Bodfish Canyon Road from Lake Isabella Blvd to End of Road - 2.9 miles - Class II Lake Isabella Sierra Way from Kernville Airport to SR 178 - 11.2 miles - Class III Lake Isabella Hwy 155 from Wofford Road to Lake Isabella Blvd - 5.5 miles - Class III Lake Isabella SR 178 from SR 155 to Sierra Way - 11.4 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Lake Isabella SR 178 from Mobile Drive to Poplar Street - 0.8 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Lake Isabella Lynch Canyon Drive from SR 178 to Poplar Street - 0.7 miles - Neighborhood Green Streets McFarland Sherwood Avenue from Stradley Avenue to S Garzoli Avenue - 1 miles - Class II McFarland Perkins Avenue from Stradley Avenue to S Garzoli Avenue - 1 miles - Class II Mojave Sierra Hwy from Oak Creek Road to Purdy Avenue - 2.4 miles - Class I Mojave Rosewood Blvd from Kyle Street to 5th Street - 5 miles - Class II Mojave Purdy Ave from 45th Street to Town Limits - 6.8 miles - Class II Mojave Oak Creek Road from 45th Street to K Street - 2.3 miles - Class II Mojave O Street from Inyo Street to Park Street - 0.4 miles - Class II Mojave Kock Street from Arroyo Avenue to Purdy Avenue - 3.1 miles - Class II Mojave K Street from Oak Creek Road to Inyo Street` - 0.5 miles - Class II Mojave Inyo Street from K Street to O Street - 0.3 miles - Class II Mojave Holt Street from Arroyo Avenue to Purdy Avenue - 3 miles - Class II Mojave Denise Avenue from 5th Street to Town Limits - 1.5 miles - Class II Mojave Camelot Blvd from 45th Street to Holt Street - 1.6 miles - Class II Mojave Butte Avenue from 5th Street to Town Limits - 1.5 miles - Class II Mojave Arroyo Avenue from 5th Street to Town Limits - 1.5 miles - Class II Mojave Arroyo Avenue from 45th Street to SR 58 - 1.9 miles - Class II Mojave 5th Street from Rosewood Blvd to Purdy Avenue - 5.1 miles - Class II Mojave 40th Street from Arroyo Avenue to Purdy Avenue - 3.1 miles - Class II Mojave Sierra Hwy from Rosamond Blvd to Silver Queen Road - 9.3 miles - Class III Mojave SR 58 from SR 14 (Sierra Hwy) to 5th Street - 2.9 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Ridgecrest Javis Avenue Parkway from China Lake Blvd to S Downs St Parkway - 1.2 miles - Class I Ridgecrest Indian Wells Valley Parkway Trail from N Jacks Rancho Road to N Jacks Rancho Road - 12.6 miles - Class I Ridgecrest Bowman Road from Jacks Ranch Road to Brady Street - 1 miles - Class I

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 13 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized (Continued) Project Location Scope YOE Cost Ridgecrest Springer Avenue from College Heights Blvd to Gateway Blvd - 1 miles - Class II Ridgecrest Springer Avenue from S Downs Street to Norma St Parkway - 0.5 miles - Class II Ridgecrest Springer Ave from Jacks Ranch Road to Brady Street - 1 miles - Class II Ridgecrest S Downs Street from S China Lake Blvd to E Javis Ave - 1.1 miles - Class II Ridgecrest Javis Ave from South China Lake Blvd to Norma St Parkway - 1.8 miles - Class II Ridgecrest Jacks Ranch Road from Ridgecrest Blvd to Springer Avenue - 2 miles - Class II Ridgecrest Drummond Avenue from Jacks Ranch Road to Downs Street - 1 miles - Class II Ridgecrest Brady Street from Inyokern Road (SR 178) to South China Lake Blvd - 4.7 miles - Class II Ridgecrest E Dolphin Avenue from Gateway Blvd to Lumill Street - 0.5 miles - Class III Ridgecrest E Belle Vista Parkway from Gateway Blvd to Summit Street - 0.4 miles - Class III Ridgecrest US 395 from China Lake Blvd to San Bernardino Cty Line - 14 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Shafter Shafter Avenue from Sierra Avenue (Shafter) to Kimberlina Road - 3.3 miles - Class II Shafter Riverside Street from Central Valley Hwy to Driver Road - 2.6 miles - Class II Shafter Riverside Street from Poplar Avenue to Charry Avenue - 2.5 miles - Class II Shafter Poplar Avenue from Fresno Avenue to Riverside Street - 2 miles - Class II Shafter Palm Avenue from Kimberlina Road to Fresno Avenue - 3 miles - Class II Shafter Palm Avenue from Lupine Court to Kimberlina Road - 1.5 miles - Class II Shafter Magnolia Avenue from McCombs Road to Kimbelina Road - 4 miles - Class II Shafter Kimberlina Road from Magnolia Avenue to Shafter Avenue - 5.1 miles - Class II Shafter Fresno Avenue from Palm Avenue to Shafter Avenue - 4.1 miles - Class II Wasco Central Avenue from Filburn Avenue to Kimberlina Road - 1.5 miles - Class II Taft Pico Street from S 6th Street to Asher Way - 0.1 miles - Class II Taft Olive Avenue from Supply Row to Wood Street - 0.3 miles - Class II Taft Harding Avenue from A Street to E Street - 0.2 miles - Class II Taft Grevillea Street from Division Road to Harrison Street - 0.5 miles - Class II Taft General Petroleum from 2nd Street to Wood Street - 0.4 miles - Class II Taft Elm Street from Division Road to Harrison Street - 0.5 miles - Class II Taft E Street from Harding Avenue to 10th Street - 0.6 miles - Class II Taft E Ash Street from Adams Street to Airport Road - 0.9 miles - Class II Taft Division Road from Grevillea Street to Ash Street - 0.7 miles - Class II Taft Cedar Street from Harrison Street to Airport Road - 1.6 miles - Class II Taft Cedar Street from Division Road to Tyler Street - 0.4 miles - Class II

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 14 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Non-motorized (Continued) Taft Asher Avenue from Supply Row to South Street - 0.5 miles - Class II Taft Ash Street from Emmons Park to Harrison Street - 0.2 miles - Class II Taft A Street from Arroyo Drive to Hilard Street - 0.3 miles - Class II Taft Taft Path from Kern River Parkway to Gardner Field Road - 10.6 miles - Other Taft Gardner Field Road from County to Aqueduct - 1.5 miles - Other Tehachapi White Pine Drive from Tehachapi Blvd to Mariposa Road - 0.4 miles - Class II Tupman Tule Elk Reserve Path from Tupman Path to Tule Elk Reserve State Park - 1.3 miles - Other County Garlock Road from Redrock-Randsburg Road to US 395 - 18 miles - Class III Wasco Hwy 46 from Gun Club Road to Magnolia Ave - 8 miles - Caltrans Shoulder Various locations Countywide Construct Pedestrian Enhancement Improvements 77,500,000 Various locations Countywide Construct Complete Streets Improvements 261,000,000 Sub-total $424,000,000

2022 through 2046 - Freight Rail

Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Start Freight Rail Tehachapi Double-track sections from Bakersfield to Mojave - Phase 2 $100,000,000 Freight Rail Shafter Shafter Intermodal Rail Facility - Phase 3 60,000,000 (Information only) Sub-total $160,000,000

2022 through 2026 - Major Highway Improvements

Project Location YOE Cost Project ID Start Route 46 Lost Hills Brown Material Rd to I-5 - interchange upgrade at I-5 - Phase 4B 40,000,000 KER08RTP018 2022 Route 46 Lost Hills Brown Material Rd to I-5 - interchange upgrade at I-5 - Phase 4C 37,000,000 KER08RTP018 2023 Route 58 Bakersfield Rosedale Hwy - Rt 43 to Allen Rd - widen existing highway 59,000,000 KER08RTP092 2026 Route 58 Metro Bkfd Rosedale Hwy @ Minkler Spur / Landco - construct grade separation 27,000,000 KER08RTP118 2026 Route 65 Metro Bkfd James Rd to Merle Haggard Dr - widen to four lanes 3,000,000 KER08RTP094 2023 Route 99 Bakersfield Olive Drive - construct interchange upgrades 6,100,000 KER08RTP091 2026 Route 99 Bakersfield Eastbound Westside Parkway to Route 58 ramp - construct auxiliary lane 100,000,000 KER22RTP003 2026 Route 178 Bakersfield At Rt 204 - construct interchange 25,700,000 KER08RTP095 2026 Route 184 Metro Bkfd At Union Pacific Railroad - construct grade separation 26,400,000 KER08RTP108 2026 Centennial Corridor Bakersfield Stockdale Hwy from SR 43 to Heath Road - widen existing highway 59,000,000 KER22RTP005 2026 Hageman Flyover Bakersfield Knudsen Dr to Rt 204 - construct extension 68,900,000 KER08RTP013 2022 Sub-total $452,100,000

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 15 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

2027 through 2031 - Major Highway Improvements

Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Start Route 14 Inyokern Redrock / Inyokern Rd to Rt 178 - widen to four lanes (Phase 2) 42,000,000 KER08RTP017 2031 Route 119 Taft Cherry Ave to Elk Hills Rd (Phase 1, bypass) - widen to four lanes 115,000,000 KER08RTP022 2031 Route 178 Metro Bkfd Near Oswell St to Vineland Rd - widen existing freeway 17,000,000 KER08RTP111 2031 Sub-total $397,293,000

2032 through 2036 - Major Highway Improvements Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Start Route 14 Inyokern Redrock / Inyokern Rd to Rt 178 - widen to four lanes (Phase 3) $32,000,000 KER08RTP024 2036 Route 58 Bakersfield At various locations - ramp improvements ( HOV - ramp metering) $32,600,000 KER08RTP103 2036 Route 58 Bakersfield Union Ave to Fairfax Rd - widen to eight lanes 47,400,000 KER08RTP093 2036 Route 99 Bakersfield Beardsley Canal to 7th Standard Rd - widen to eight lanes 90,800,000 KER08RTP138 2036 Route 99 Bakersfield At Olive Drive - reconstruct interchange 108,000,000 KER08RTP021 2036 Route 99 Bakersfield At Snow Rd - construct new interchange 138,200,000 KER08RTP115 2036 Route 99 Bakersfield At various locations - ramp improvements (HOV - ramp metering) 37,000,000 KER08RTP105 2036 Route 119 Metro Bkfd I-5 to Buena Vista - widen to four lanes 31,300,000 KER08RTP099 2036 Route 178 Bakersfield At Rt 204 and 178 - reconstruct freeway ramps (HOV - ramp metering) 50,000,000 KER08RTP085 2036 Route 178 Bakersfield At various locations - ramp improvements (HOV - ramp metering) 37,000,000 KER08RTP106 2036 Route 178 Bakersfield Existing west terminus to Oswell St - widen to eight lanes (HOV) 140,500,000 KER08RTP026 2036 Route 184 Bakersfield Panama Rd to Rt 58 - widen to four lanes 10,500,000 KER08RTP100 2036 Route 184 Bakersfield Morning Dr to Rt 178 - widen to four lanes 5,000,000 KER08RTP101 2032 Route 184 Lamont Rt 58 to Rt 178 - widen to four lanes 90,000,000 KER08RTP045 2036 Route 204 Bakersfield Airport Drive to Rt 178 - widen existing highway 55,000,000 KER08RTP083 2036 Route 204 Bakersfield F St - construct interchange 36,000,000 KER08RTP081 2036 7th Standard Rd Shafter/Bkfd Rt 43 to Santa Fe Way - widen existing roadway 14,000,000 KER08RTP113 2036 Western Urban Corridor Metro Bkfd White Lane to Westside Parkway - construct new facility 115,793,000 KER08RTP139 2036 Western Urban Corridor Metro Bkfd Rosedale Hwy to 1/2 mile north of 7th Standard Rd - construct new facility 115,793,000 KER08RTP102 2036 Western Urban Corridor Metro Bkfd Rosedale Hwy to Westside Parkway - construct new facility 93,500,000 KER08RTP016 2036 Sub-total $1,280,386,000

2037 through 2046 - Major Highway Improvements Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Start Route 119 Taft Elk Hills - County Rd to Tupman Ave - widen to four lanes (Phase 2) 48,000,000 KER08RTP086 2046 Route 178 Metro Bkfd Vineland to Miramonte - new interchange; widen existing freeway 119,000,000 KER08RTP025 2046 Route 178 Bakersfield Miramonte to Rancheria - widen existing highway 19,800,000 KER08RTP084 2046 US 395 Ridgecrest Between Rt 178 and China Lake Blvd - construct passing lanes 20,000,000 KER08RTP089 2046 Western Urban Corridor Metro Bkfd Taft Hwy to White Lane - construct new facillity 90,000,000 KER08RTP097 2046 Sub-total $296,800,000 Total Major Highway Improvements $2,203,286,000

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 16 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.1 - CONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.1 - Constrained Capital Improvement Program Continued 2022 through 2046 - Local Streets and Roads

Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Start Various Locations Metro Bkfd Bridge and street widening; reconstruction $540,000,000 Various Locations Metro Bkfd Signalization 15,000,000 Various Locations Rosamond Street widening; signalization 112,000,000 Various Locations Countywide Transportation Control Measures 386,000,000 Various Locations Countywide Bridge and street widening; reconstruction; signalization 632,000,000 Sub-total $1,685,000,000 * Note: Adjustments to programming were made regarding the overlap of HOV related improvements listed separately from regionally significant highway improvements.

2018 through 2046 - Summary of Constrained Projects Program Category Totals Transit / Rail / High Speed Rail 2,072,200,000 Operational Improvements - HOV Lanes / Ramp Metering 297,000,000 Pedestrian Complete Streets and Bicycle Improvements 424,000,000 Local Streets and Roads 1,685,000,000 Major Highway Improvements 2022-2026 $452,100,000 Major Highway Improvements 2027-2046* 1,751,186,000 Freight Rail 160,000,000 Grand Total $6,841,486,000

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 17 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.2 - UNCONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.2 - Unconstrained Program of Projects Beyond 2046 - Transit Project Location Scope YOE Capital Cost Shafter, Amtrak San Joaquins stop in North/West Bakersfield - platform, track turnout , Local Passenger Rail $5,000,000 Bakersfield park&ride, ticket both, RoW (2012 Commuter Rail Study) Shafter, Up to 4 Amtrak San Joaquins stops on BNSF - platform, track turnout , Local Passenger Rail $20,000,000 Bakersfield park&ride, ticket both, RoW (2012 Commuter Rail Study) Wasco, Local Passenger Rail Positive Train Control Port Chicago - Bakersfield (Draft 2012 State Rail Plan) $24,000,000 Bakersfield Shafter, NW Local Passenger Rail Double Track BNSF Jastro/Landco to Shafter (Draft 2012 State Rail Plan) $71,300,000 Bakersfield Local Passenger Rail Shafter, Wasco Double Track BNSF Shafter to Wasco (Draft 2012 State Rail Plan) $37,000,000 Local Passenger Rail NW Bakersfield Jastro Curve Realignment (Draft 2012 State Rail Plan) $50,000,000

Wasco, Corridor Wide Signal Upgrades to 90 MPH - Oakland to Bakersfield (Draft 2012 Local Passenger Rail $55,000,000 Bakersfield State Rail Plan)

Local Passenger Rail Wasco, County Double Track BNSF Wasco to Corcoran (Draft 2012 State Rail Plan) $200,000,000

Local Passenger Rail Eastern California Mammoth Lakes to Lancaster/Palmdale (2005 E. Sierra Public Transit Study) $3,335,000,000

Local Passenger Rail Metro Bakersfield Rail Connections to High Speed Rail Station $200,000,000 Buttonwillow, Commuter Rail Metro/Southwest Corridor (2012 Commuter Rail Study) $158,300,000 SW Bakersfield Arvin, Lamont, SE Commuter Rail Metro/Southeast Corridor (2012 Commuter Rail Study) $162,400,000 Bakersfield Wasco, Shafter, Commuter Rail Metro/Northwest Corridor (2012 Commuter Rail Study) $220,600,000 NW Bakersfield Mojave, Cal City, Commuter Rail Metrolink Service Extension - Tehachapi Corridor (2012 Commuter Rail Study) $231,300,000 Tehachapi

Delano, Commuter Rail Metro/Airport, Delano Corridor (2012 Commuter Rail Study) $317,800,000 McFarland

Light Rail Bakersfield Metropolitan Bakersfield Light Rail System (2012 Long Range Transit Plan) $4,000,000,000

Northwest of Bakersfield to Palmdale (potential early initial operating segment High Speed Rail Kern, L.A. County $20,000,000,000 from Madera to Palmdale Metrolink Service)

Sub-total $29,087,700,000

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 18 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.2 - UNCONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.2 - Unconstrained Program of Projects Continued Beyond 2046 - Freight rail Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID RailEx Expansion Phase 3 Intermodal hub Delano $20,000,000 (Draft SJV Interregional Goods Movement Plan IGM)

Intermodal hub Shafter Shafter Inland Port Phases 2 & 3 (Draft SJV IGMP) $60,000,000 Delano, Shafter, shortline rail Shortline Rail Rehabilitation and Gap Closure (Draft SJV IGMP) $100,000,000 McFarland shortline rail Bakersfield SJVR - Expand Bakersfield Yard Capacity (Draft SJV IGMP) $250,000,000 Arvin, Tejon, shortline rail SJVR - Shortline Rail Improvments (Draft SJV IGMP) $100,000,000 Buttonwillow shortline rail Mojave Mojave - Airport Rail Access Improvements (Draft SJV IGMP) $3,000,000

Sub-total $533,000,000

Beyond 2046 - Active Transportation Project Scope YOE Cost Project ID Future long-range non-motorized updates for bicycle and pedestrian related infrastructure may indicate a greater need for capital improvements. During the life of this plan, current expectations may be met as outlined in recent long-range bike and pedestrian studies and reflected in Table 5.1. Should these expectations change in the future this plan will be updated. Sub-total $0

Beyond 2046 - Aviation Airport Scope YOE Cost Project ID California City Capital Improvements $15,479,900 Inyokern Capital Improvements 26,429,900 Kern Valley Capital Improvements 4,723,827 Meadows Field Capital Improvements 36,260,000 Mojave Capital Improvements 40,883,089 Poso Capital Improvements 450,000 Shafter - Minter Field Capital Improvements 8,280,000 Taft Capital Improvements 1,804,000 Tehachapi Municipal Capital Improvements 7,911,400 Sub-total $142,222,116

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 19 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.2 - UNCONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.2 - Unconstrained Program of Projects Continued

Major Highway Improvements Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Beyond 2046 - Major Highway Improvements Interstate 5 Kern From Fort Tejon to Rt 99 - widen to ten lanes $86,000,000 KER08RTP027 Interstate 5 Kern Grapevine interchange - construct new interchange / relocate weigh station $176,000,000 KER18RTP004 Interstate 5 Kern Laval Road - interchange improvements $4,000,000 KER18RTP005 Interstate 5 Kern 7th Standard Rd Interchange - reconstruct 54,000,000 KER08RTP028 Route 33 Maricopa Welch St to Midway Rd - widen to four lanes 88,000,000 KER08RTP029 Route 43 Shafter 7th Standard Rd to Euclid Ave - widen to four lanes 37,000,000 KER08RTP030 Route 46 Wasco I-5 to Jumper Ave - widen to four lanes 118,000,000 KER08RTP031 Route 46 Wasco Jumper Ave (North) to Rt 43 - widen to four lanes 130,000,000 KER08RTP079 Route 46 Wasco Rt 46 @ BNSF - construct grade separation 39,500,000 KER08RTP119 Route 46 Kern Near Lost Hills at Interstate 5 - upgrade and widen interchange 130,000,000 KER08RTP033 Route 46 Wasco Rt 43 to Rt 99 - widen to four lanes 70,000,000 KER08RTP032 Route 58 Kern Rosedale Highway - I-5 to Rt 43 - widen to four lanes 31,000,000 KER08RTP038 Route 58 Bakersfield Future Rt 58 from I-5 to Heath Rd at Stockdale Hwy - construct new freeway 500,000,000 KER08RTP114 Route 58 Tehachapi Dennison Rd - construct interchange 33,000,000 KER08RTP036 Route 58 Bakersfield Near General Beale Rd - new truck weigh station 11,000,000 KER08RTP034 Route 58 Kern/Tehachapi East of Tehachapi to General Beale Rd - truck auxillary lanes / escape ramp 86,000,000 KER08RTP035 Route 58 Bakersfield General Beale Rd - construct new interchange 54,000,000 KER08RTP037 Route 58 California City Business 58 OC to Edwards Air Force Base OC - convert to freeway 112,000,000 KER22RTP004 Route 65 Kern Merle Haggard Dr to County Line - widen to four lanes 216,000,000 KER08RTP039 Route 99 McFarland Construct new interchange at Hanawalt 88,811,000 KER18RTP001 Route 99 County/Bkfd Rt 99 @ Minkler Spur - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP134 Route 99 County/Bkfd 7th Standard Road to Lerdo Highway - widen to 8 lanes 90,000,000 KER18RTP003 Route 119 Taft Rt 33 to Cherry Ave - widen to four lanes 54,000,000 KER08RTP040 Route 119 Taft Tupman Rd to I-5 - widen to four lanes 60,000,000 KER08RTP041 Route 155 Delano Rt 99 to Browning Rd - four lanes; reconstruct 32,000,000 KER08RTP042 Route 155 Delano Rt 155 @ UPRR - construct grade separation 39,500,000 KER08RTP120 Route 166 Maricopa Basic School Rd - reconstruct intersection grade 517,582 KER08RTP043 Route 178 Kern Canyon Vineland to China Garden - new freeway 500,000,000 KER08RTP044 Route 204 Bakersfield (Golden State Ave) Rt 99 to M St - construct operational improvements 100,000,000 KER08RTP082 Route 202 Tehachapi Tucker to Woodford-Tehachapi Rd - widen to four lane 9,704,661 KER08RTP047 Route 223 Near Arvin Rt 99 to Rt 184 - widen to four lanes 69,010,921 KER08RTP048 Route 223 Arvin East Arvin city limits to Rt 58 - widen to four lanes 64,697,738 KER08RTP049 US 395 Johannesburg San Bdo County Line to Rt 14 - widen to four lanes 244,000,000 KER08RTP050

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 20 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.2 - UNCONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.2 - Unconstrained Program of Projects Continued

Major Highway Improvements Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Beyond 2046 - Major Highway Improvements Southern Urban Corridor Bakersfield I-5 to Rt 58 - new facility $610,000,000 KER08RTP074 Santa Fe Way Bakersfield Hageman to Los Angeles Ave - widen to four lanes 127,238,885 KER08RTP051 Eastern Urban Corridor Bakersfield Rt 58 to Morning Drive - construct new facility 200,000,000 KER08RTP078 Beale Road Bakersfield L St/Beale @ BNSF - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP127 Q Street Bakersfield Q St @ UPRR near Golden State Hwy - construct grade separation 59,000,000 KER08RTP136 Comanche Drive Cnty/Bkfd Comanche Dr. @ UPRR - construct grade separation 59,000,000 KER08RTP123 Olive Drive County/Bkfd Olive Dr. @ UPRR - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP129 Renfro Road County/Bkfd Renfro Rd @ BNSF - construct grade separation 59,000,000 KER08RTP130 California City Blvd California City Rt 14 east six miles - widen to four lanes 22,000,000 KER08RTP052 Twenty Mule Team Rd California City California City Blvd to Rt 58 - widen to four lanes 21,565,913 KER08RTP053 North Gate Road California City California City Blvd to North Edwards - construct new four lane road 60,384,555 KER08RTP054 Woollomes Ave. Delano Rt 99 - widen bridge to four lanes; reconstruct ramps 134,000,000 KER08RTP056 Garces Highway Delano Interstate 5 to Rt 99 - widen to four lanes 288,983,230 KER08RTP057 Cecil Ave. Delano Wasco Pond Rd to Albany St - widen to four lanes 17,800,000 KER08RTP055 Kimberlina Road Kern / Wasco Kimberlina Rd @ BNSF - construct grade separation 59,000,000 KER08RTP132 Red Apple Rd Kern Tucker Rd to Westwood Blvd - widen to four lanes 4,313,183 KER08RTP058 Sierra Way Kern Lake Isabella at South Fork Bridge - reconstruct bridge 51,758,190 KER08RTP059 Frazier Park Kern Park and Ride facility near Frazier Park Blvd 12,939,548 KER08RTP060 Wheeler Ridge Rd Kern I-5 to Rt 223 - widen to four lanes 129,395,476 KER08RTP061 K Street Kern Mojave - extend K St to Rt 14 12,939,548 KER08RTP063 Kratzmeyer Road Kern Kratzmeyer Rd @ BNSF - construct grade separation 59,000,000 KER08RTP128 Airport Drive Kern Airport Dr. @ UPRR - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP131 Rosamond Blvd Kern Rosamond Blvd @ UPRR - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP133 K Street Kern / Mojave K St @ UPRR - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP135 Elmo Highway McFarland Elmo Hwy @ UPRR - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP124 Dennison Road Tehachapi Green St/ Dennison Rd @ UPRR - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP121 Teh. Willow Springs Rd Tehachapi Rt 58 to Rosamond Blvd - widen to four lanes 150,961,389 KER08RTP064 Valley Blvd Tehachapi Tucker Rd to Curry St - widen to four lanes 23,722,504 KER08RTP065 Kern Ave. McFarland Pedestrian bridge at Rt 99 - reconstruct 5,391,470 KER08RTP066 Mahan St Ridgecrest Inyokern to South China Lake Blvd - widen to four lanes 32,348,869 KER08RTP067 Richmond Rd Ridgecrest E Ridgecrest Blvd - widen to four lanes 6,469,774 KER08RTP068 Bowman Rd Ridgecrest China Lake to San Bernardino Blvd - reconstruct 4,313,183 KER08RTP069

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 21 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 5.2 - UNCONSTRAINED LISTING OF PROJECT NEEDS

TABLE 5.2 - Unconstrained Program of Projects Continued

Major Highway Improvements Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Beyond 2046 - Major Highway Improvements S. China Lake Blvd Ridgecrest Rt 395 to College Heights - reconstruct $36,662,052 KER08RTP070 Lerdo Highway Shafter Lerdo Hwy / Beech Ave @ BNSF - construct grade separation 69,000,000 KER08RTP125 Burbank Street Shafter Burbank St @ BNSF - construct grade separation 59,000,000 KER08RTP126 7th Standard Rd Shafter I-5 to Santa Fe Way - widen to four lanes 90,576,833 KER08RTP072 Zachary Rd Shafter 7th Standard Rd to Lerdo Hwy - widen to four lanes 34,505,460 KER08RTP073 Northern Urban Corridor Shafter I-5 to SR 65 - Burbank Street Alignment - construct new highway 500,000,000 KER18RTP002 Western Urban Corridor South metro Taft Hwy to I-5 - extend facility 100,000,000 KER08RTP075 Western Urban Corridor North metro 7th Standard Rd to Rt 99 -extend facility 100,000,000 KER08RTP076 Sub-total $7,081,011,961

Beyond 2046 - Local Streets and Roads

Project Location Scope YOE Cost Project ID Various Locations Region Bridge and street widening; reconstruction; signalization $500,000,000 Sub-total $500,000,000

Beyond 2046 - Summary of Unconstrained Projects Program Category Totals Major Highway Improvements $ 7,081,011,961 Local Streets and Roads $ 500,000,000 Transit $ 29,087,700,000 Active Transportation $ - Aviation $ 142,222,116

Grand Total $ 36,810,934,077

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 22 of 23 DRAFT 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - TABLE 6.1 - FINANCIAL SUMMARY TABLE

Table 6-1 Revenue Forecast 2018-2040 ($ X 1,000)

Overall Transit, HOV, Aviation Funding Source Total Revenue Roads & Highways Pedestrian & Bicycle Percent & Other

Capital O & M Capital O & M Capital O & M Local Sources Cal Vans - Private Funds $ 192,000 1.75% $ 48,000 $ 144,000 Local - General Funds - streets and roads maintenance $ 400,000 3.64% $ 320,000 $ 80,000 Local Transportation Funds $ 1,205,000 10.98% $ 301,000 $ 904,000 Bus Farebox $ 171,000 1.56% $ 171,000 Local Agency Funds/Developer Fees/Regional Fees/Other $ 3,109,000 28.32% $ 37,000 $ 2,937,275 $ 134,725 Subtotal $ 5,077,000 46.25% State Sources STIP (Regional and Interregional) $ 1,125,000 10.25% $ 140,000 $ 985,000 State Transit Assistance (STA) $ 460,000 4.19% $ 100,000 $ 360,000 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) $ 750,000 6.83% $ 750,000 State Aid to Airports $ 3,000 0.03% $ 3,000 Subtotal $ 2,338,000 21.30% Federal Sources Regional Surface Transportation Program $ 210,000 1.91% $ 190,000 $ 20,000 Transportation Alternatives Program / Active Transportation $ 37,500 0.34% $ 37,500 Program / Safe Routes to School Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program $ 197,500 1.80% $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 48,750 $ 48,750 Local Assistance (HES, HBRR, Sec.130, Emergency Relief) $ 82,000 0.75% $ 82,000 $ 6 Federal Aid to Airports $ 45,000 0.41% $ 22,500 $ 22,500 FTA Section 5307 (Transit – metro) $ 97,500 0.89% $ 24,375 $ 73,125 FTA Section 5310 and 5311 (Transit – senior/disabled/rural) $ 22,500 0.20% $ 5,625 $ 16,875 Recovery Act - High Speed Rail $ 1,500,000 13.66% $ 1,500,000 State/Federal Demonstration / Other $ 39,600 0.36% $ 9,600 $ - $ 30,000 Subtotal $ 2,231,600 20.33% $ 2,251,100 $ 1,691,500 $ 3,962,275 $ 1,390,750 $ 250,981 $ 100,000 Other Sources - Revenue Streams during life of RTP May be derived from the following: $ 1,331,000 12.12% $ 95,000 $ 156,000 $ - $ 700,000 $ 150,000 $ 230,000 Cap and Trade Revenue E-Commerce Freight Fee / National Freight Program Future State Bond Proceeds Odometer-based user fee Self-help sales tax State Federal Excise Tax on Fuel Mass Transportation - expansion of transit system $ 120,000 1.09% $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Mass Transportation - Commuter Rail $ 211,000 1.92% $ 115,000 $ 96,000 Highway Safety; Streets and Roads and Maintenance $ 850,000 7.74% $ 700,000 $ 150,000 Non-motorized system Countywide Capital & Maintenance $ 150,000 1.37% $ 31,000 $ 80,000 Subtotal $ 1,331,000 12.12% Total $10,977,600 100.00% $ 2,346,100 $ 1,847,500 $ 3,962,275 $ 2,090,750 $ 400,981 $ 330,000 Total of Capital Revenue $ 6,709,356 100% 21.4% 16.8% 36.1% 19.0% 3.7% 3.0% Total of O & M (Operations and Maintenance $ 4,268,250 38.2% 55.1% 6.7% $175,000 $156,000 $0 $700,000 $70,000 $230,000

Prepared by Kern Council of Governments February 5, 2020 Page 23 of 23 V. TPPC

February 20, 2020

TO: Transportation Planning Policy Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi, Executive Director

By: Ben Raymond, Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TPPC AGENDA ITEM: V PUBLIC WORKSHOP/PUBLIC COMMENT – 2020-2050 GROWTH FORECAST DRAFT REPORT

DESCRIPTION:

The 2020-2050 Growth Forecast Draft Report is available for review and public comment on Kern COG’s webpage https://www.kerncog.org/estimates-and-projections/. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed this item.

DISCUSSION:

Background

The Regional Growth Forecast Defined - The Kern COG regional growth forecast is a long-range projection for countywide total population. The population total is used to develop housing, employment, school enrollment, and income forecasts. The forecast is used for local transportation and air quality planning as well as by the member agencies for a variety of long-range planning activities. This forecast revision will serve as the growth assumption for the 2022 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. The forecast is used as a control target by the modeling committee and RPAC for distribution of socio-economic data throughout the county sub areas. The forecast is based on Census Data and California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates for the base year. If the growth forecast is more than 1.5% outside of DOF projections, Kern COG will need to provide a detailed explanation why the forecasts differs and work with DOF to agree on the forecast methodology.

Review Requirements – The Kern COG Policy and Procedure Manual states:

“Socio-Economic Forecast Data – Countywide forecasts for households, employment and other socio-economic data shall be updated not less than 3 years from the time of the Socio-economic forecast. A minimum of three years between Countywide forecast revisions is needed to allow responsible state and federal agencies time to complete their review of large environmental documents without major changes to transportation circulation modeling results...“

The Kern COG adopted Public Policy and Procedure manual requires an advertised notice of public meetings/workshops regarding the regional growth forecast and 30-day public comment period. Additional, extensive opportunities for public comment on the forecast will be provided as part of the 2022 Regional Transportation Plan adoption.

Committee Oversight – The Kern COG Transportation Modeling sub-committee and the Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC) will provide oversight during the growth forecast update. The committees currently meet together and are also responsible for sub-area distribution of the growth forecast following the adoption. The regional growth forecast will be presented to the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) concurrently, and then to the Transportation Planning Policy Committee/Kern COG Board for final adoption.

Draft Regional Growth Forecast Report – The Draft Report is available for public review on Kern COG’s website: https://www.kerncog.org/estimates-and-projections/. The primary forecasts of the regional growth forecast are for the number of households, population, housing units, and employment. The report also provides forecast data demographic characteristics including: age distribution, housing units by type, average household size, household income, race and ethnicity.

The draft report shows Kern’s total population reaching 1 million by 2028 and by 2050 the population is expected to reach 1.2 million. The number of households are expected to increase to just over 362,000 by 2050 from 270,000 in 2019. Total employment is forecasted to grow from 338,000 in 2019 to 402,000 in 2050.

The report compares the forecasts with other forecasts, projections and trends. The total population forecast stays within 1.5% of the latest DOF projections. The graph below depicts how the forecast for total population compares to other forecasts and projections.

Kern County Population Forecasts 1,800,000

1,600,000

1,400,000

1,200,000

1,000,000

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

- 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

KernCOG 2015 DOF 2018 Draft KernCOG 2020 DOF 2019

Figure 1. A bove image compares latest projections with previous projections from California Department of Finance (DOF) and Kern COG.

Revised Growth Forecast Timeline – The following schedule is anticipated for forecast adoption:

• August 12th, 2019 –Project Kickoff Meeting & review initial data inputs and status update • September 4th, 2019 - Draft white paper on Oil and Ag employment review by RPAC • February 5th, 2020 - Draft growth report presented to RPAC & TTAC members for review and comments • February 7th, 2020 - 30-day public comment period notification (press release/flyers/draft report to be available at www.kerncog.org) • February 20th, 2020 - Public Workshop on Growth Forecast • February 20th, 2020 - Kern COG Board reviews draft forecast for information and comments • March 9th, 2020 - Close of 30-day public review period • March 2020 - RPAC and TTAC review report and public comments and make recommendation to Kern COG board. • March 2020 - Kern COG Board considers adoption of the regional growth forecast.

ACTION: Information.