Parliamentary Insider

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Insider Table of content Open Parliament Newsletter PARLIAMENTARY INSIDER Introductory remarks 5 Issue 12 / March - April 2020 From discussing weapons to reviewing the fundamental role of the MPs in the state of emergency 5 Month in the parliament 7 Parliament in numbers 9 OUR HIGHLIGHTS: Analysis of the Open Parliament 11 Women in Parliament: XI Legislature 11 Introductory remarks: Selection of law abstracts 14 From discussing weapons to reviewing the fundamental role Law concerning the confirmation of the Protocol amending the Convention for the of the MPs in the State of Emergencynaslovna Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data 14 Proposal of the Law amending the Law on ID card 16 Open Parliament Analysis Proposal of the Law amending the Law on Road Safety 18 Women in Parliament: XI Legislature Law amending the Law on Local Elections 19 Summaries of the laws Law amending the Law on Election of the Members of Parliament 20 Law concerning the confirmation of the Protocol amending Law amending the Law on Population Protection from the Infectious Diseases 20 the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data Law amending the Law on Local Elections Summaries of the audio reports Strofa, Refren, Replika Law amending the Law on Election of the Members of Parliament 24th episode Law amending the Law on Population Protection from the Infectious Diseases 25th episode 26th episode Audio reports #StrofaRefrenReplika 27th episode 28th episode 29th episode 30th episode 31st episode INTRODUCTORY REMARKS From discussing weapons to reviewing the fundamental role of the MPs in the state of emergency The key highlights of March and April in the Parliament are the reduced activities of the MPs during Spring Session, proclamation of the state of emergency and convening of the first sitting during the state of emergency. During March and April, the MPs worked for five days in total and adopted only four laws and two decisions. After more than a year of absence from plenary sittings, the MPs from Social Demo- THE OPEN PARLIAMENT INITIATIVE cratic Party (SDS) Marko Djurisic and Nenad Konstantinovic have ended the boycott of the Parlia- ment. During this period, a new parliamentary group Vojvodina Front -Serbia 21 was established gathering MPs from Social Democratic Party, League of Social Democrats of Vojvodina and De- The Open Parliament Initiative has been monitoring the work of the Serbian Parlia- mocratic Alliance of Croats in Vojvodina. Slobodan Velickovic, an MP candidate from the electoral ment every day since 2012. The Open Parliament collects and publishes data on the list “ALEKSANDAR VUCIC – SERBIA WINS”, gained a mandate of a colleague from Party of United Parliament’s work and results and deals with the analysis of various processes from Pensioners of Serbia, Vera Paunovic, who had died at the end of February. the perspective of transparency, accountability and participation. The regular Spring Session started on 2 March by singing the national anthem in the Assembly Hall. Among other, the agenda of the first regular sitting included Proposal of the amendment to The main goal of the Open Parliament Initiative is to increase transparency and ac- the Law on Weapons and Ammunition, related to the extending of the registration deadlines. The countability of the work of the Parliament, to inform the citizens about the work of MPs discussed about complicated procedures, citizens’ general lack of information, but also lazi- the Parliament and to establish regular communication between citizens and their ness of the system to solve such matters. The proposers of the Law, Marijan Risticevic, Djordje Ko- elected representatives. Our work is based on the values contained in the internatio- mlenski and Bojan Torbica suggested to extend the deadline for replacing weapons licence for two nal Declaration on Parliamentary Openness, and the Open Parliament took part in the years, which was supported by the Assembly majority. In addition, two international agreements development of this initiative. and the Decision on dismissal and appointment of members and deputy members of the Republic Electoral Commission were adopted. Since January 2018, the Open Parliament team has increased the focus of this ini- tiative’s activities on democratism and accountability in the conduct of MPs and the On 4 March, the Speaker of the National Assembly Maja Gojkovic called and scheduled local and work of the institution. parliamentary elections for 26 April. The Republic Electoral Commission, which also works in the parliamentary premises, confirmed nine electoral lists during March, and on 15 March when the state of emergency was declared in entire country it has stopped its activities. Method of proclai- ming state of emergency by the signatures from the President of Serbia, Speaker of the Assembly and the Prime Minister ignited the discussion in the public on different interpretations of the hig- hest legal act of the country, as well as the importance and role of the Parliament. Out of 250 MPs, only eight MPs signed the request to urgently convene the Assembly. After the first regular sitting had finished, there were no plenary sittings until the end of the month, and in the hall of the National Assembly only press conferences of Sasa Radulovic, a leader of the Enough is Enough movement, were held. In the second half of March, Radulovic daily addressed the journalists as an MP with the inevitable sentence that Assembly convened during the wars, in The Federal Foreign Office of the Federal Republic of Ger- exiles, so this was the first time that Government suspended the Parliament with its own decree. many has been supporting the Open Parliament Initiative However, the Speaker of the Assembly made only one statement when she quoted the sentence since August 2018, including drawing up the newsletter. from the Constitution that “decisions are verified as soon as the Assembly is in a position to con- The views expressed in the newsletter are the views of the vene”. Open Parliament team, but they do not necessarily reflect the views of the donor. 4 5 During April, the activities of the MPs included one administrative committee, one session and do- zens of press conferences. At the sitting of the Committee on Administrative, Budgetary, Mandate and Immunity Issues the MPs have approved the reduction of the Assembly budgets. The MP from 2020 Month in the Parliament Serbian Radical Party, Nemanja Sarovic, then asked what had changed and how they could meet at MARCH the time, and before it had been impossible, but the Chairman of the Committee Aleksandar Marti- novic from Serbian Progressive Party responded that everything was done under law and that the MONTH IN THE PARLIAMENT parts of the decree concerning the ban on gathering do not refer to the members of parliament. On the first session during the state of emergency, by the majority votes of all members of parlia- The first and the last sitting of the Spring Session was held at the beginning of March. The agenda included ment, the MPs have confirmed proclamation of state of emergency and all decrees that the Go- amendments to the Law on Weapons and Ammunition, which will extend the deadline for preregistration of 2. weapons for two years, so the citizens would have enough time to make required examinations and submit the vernment adopted in fighting coronavirus. Long-awaited sitting was organised with full measures documents. Also, the agenda included the Protocol amending the Convention for the Protection of Individuals of precaution, everyone’s temperatures were checked, all the present received protective masks, with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, International agreement on economic and gloves, disinfectants, and in the Plenary Hall the MPs seats were separated with Plexiglas. For the technological cooperation between Serbia and Azerbaijan and the Decision on dismissal and appointment of first time after a while, the group of opposition MPs who had boycotted the work of the Assembly members and deputy members of the Republic Electoral Commission. plenary participated in the sitting, including the group of MPs from Democratic Party, Social Demo- cratic Party, movement Enough is Enough and New Party. The highlights of the two-day sitting were In addition to proposed acts, statements of the representatives of the opposition were also discussed in the sitting. Serbian Progressive Party MP, Vladimir Orlic, wanted Djordje Vukadinovic, who became a Member of the discussion on the state of emergency after the assassination of the Prime Minister, leaders 3. Parliament four years ago under the list that included Dveri, to detach himself from the recent statements of of opposition, primarily Dragan Djilas, Labour Day holiday, and the enormously important role of Bosko Obradovic, the leader of this movement. Discussion on this topic outside of the agenda went on for Aleksandar Vucic in saving citizens’ lives and procuring ventilators. What the MPs failed to discuss more than two hours. However, the sitting was concluded on 4 March on the Voting Day, when all the acts to such great extent were 44 decrees integrated into one law proposal that they had scrutinised from the agenda were adopted. together, along with amending budget, which was submitted to MPs as a decree and it was voted During the sitting, the Speaker of the National Assembly, Maja Gojkovic took note that mandate of Vera as such. Paunovic, the Party of United Pensioners of Serbia MP, has ended on the day of her death. Slobodan 4. Velickovic, an MP candidate from the electoral list “Aleksandar Vucic – Serbia Wins” took her seat. Velickovic As a response to eternal question who had estimated that the Assembly cannot convene in March is a retired army air force engineer. He was an MP in the IX legislature (2012-2014), and during the X when the MPs were not even invited, Government Prime Minister Ana Brnabic had constantly repe- legislature he was appointed the MP in January 2016 and remained in that office until June 2016.
Recommended publications
  • Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: Legislation, Implementation and Sustainability
    Department of Political and Social Sciences Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: Legislation, Implementation and Sustainability Igor Guardiancich Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Florence, October 2009 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Department of Political and Social Sciences Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: Legislation, Implementation and Sustainability Igor Guardiancich Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Examining Board: Prof. Martin Rhodes, University of Denver/formerly EUI (Supervisor) Prof. Nicholas Barr, London School of Economics Prof. Martin Kohli, European University Institute Prof. Tine Stanovnik, Univerza v Ljubljani © 2009, Igor Guardiancich No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Guardiancich, Igor (2009), Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: Legislation, implementation and sustainability European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/1700 Guardiancich, Igor (2009), Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: Legislation, implementation and sustainability European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/1700 Acknowledgments No PhD dissertation is a truly individual endeavour and this one is no exception to the rule. Rather it is a collective effort that I managed with the help of a number of people, mostly connected with the EUI community, to whom I owe a huge debt of gratitude. In particular, I would like to thank all my interviewees, my supervisors Prof. Martin Rhodes and Prof. Martin Kohli, as well as Prof. Tine Stanovnik for continuing intellectual support and invaluable input to the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Jenő Hajnal: National Identity Is Our Most Valuable Treasure
    Minister Ružić Meets with Representatives of Europe Insists on Rights of the National Minority National Minorities – Councils Serbia Respects These Rights 38 Minority Newjuly 2s 017 Jenő Hajnal: National Identity Is Our Most Valuable Treasure Participants in the Regional “Rose”- a Symbol NDI Roma Program Visit the and First Association Assembly of AP Vojvodina with Ruthenians HIGHLIGHT EDITORIAL 38 Minister Ružić Meets with Repre sentatives Rich ness i n Diver sity of the National Minority Do bar dan, mi rëdita, jó na pot, добър ден, bun ă ziua... B u njevac Councils Dužijan ca, Rut henian “Red Rose“, uniq ue Vlach customs , Rom a music , colourfu l Slovak natio na l costumes, kulen saus a ge from On July 25, in the Pal ace Serbia, Minister of Public Administration and Local Self- Pet rovac… – are on ly few of the featur es of the multina tional and m ulti cultural m osa ic of ou r coun try . Gover nment, Brank o Ruž ić, met with the represe ntatives of the natio na l mi - There is n o nee d to em phasize that nu merous minorities have nority co uncils in o rder to be i nformed lived in these lands together for centuries. Our politicians and about t he activ ities of the n ational mi - numero us foreign v isit ors fre quently p oint to th is fa ct. T he Au - nority counc ils an d the mo st imp ortant tonomous Province of Vojvodina is an unique example of multi - challenges they face in their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Content Archive
    Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design – Volume 34 Journal sections: ➢ Hygienic Engineering & Design ➢ Food Quality and Safety ➢ Food Production and Processing HYGIENIC ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 1. Oana M. Dumitru, Elena L. Ungureanu, Corneliu S. Iorga, Gabriel Mustățea (2021). Overall migration aspects for plastic food contact materials with food simulants using SPSS statistics. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, Vol. 34, pp. 3-8. FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY 1. Afërdita Dinaku, Amilda Ballata, Rozana Troja, Laura Shabani (2021). Evaluation of microbiological quality of fruit juice (from a single fruit). Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, Vol. 34, pp. 11-14. 2. Biljana Lončar, Milica Nićetin, Vladimir Filipović, Violeta Knežević, Lato Pezo, Danijela Šuput, Tatjana Kuljanin (2021). Osmotic dehydration in sugar beet molasses-food safety and quality benefits. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, Vol. 34, pp. 15-20. 3. Petya Ivanova, Boryana Brushlyanova, Gabor Zsivanovits, Stoil Zhelyazkov (2021). Changes in epiphytic microflora of cherry fruit stored at non-chilling and chilling temperatures. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, Vol. 34, pp. 21-25. 4. Ivaylo Sirakov, Katya Velichkova, Desislava Slavcheva-Sirakova (2021). The Proviotic® supplemented diet on growth performance, biochemical blood parameters and meat quality of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) cultivated in aquaponics. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, Vol. 34, pp. 26-30. 5. Paula M. R. Correia, Raquel P. F. Guiné, Melania C. Rodrigues, Rita Mendes (2021). Influence of temperature and packaging materials in ewe’s cheeses storage. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, Vol. 34, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Cooperation and the Prospects for Dialogue
    Transatlantic Cooperation and the Prospects for Dialogue The Council for Inclusive Governance (CIG) organized on February 26, 2021 a discussion on trans-Atlantic cooperation and the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue for a group of politicians and civil society representatives from Kosovo and Serbia. Two CIG board members, former senior officials in the U.S. Department of State and the European Commission, took part as well. The meeting specifically addressed the effects of expected revitalized transatlantic cooperation now with President Joe Biden in office, the changes in Kosovo after Albin Kurti’s February 14 election victory, and the prospects of the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue in 2021. The following are a number of conclusions and recommendations based either on consensus or broad agreement. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIG and the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA), which supports CIG’s initiative on normalization between Kosovo and Serbia. The discussion was held under the Chatham House Rule. Conclusions and recommendations The change of governments in Kosovo and in the US are positive elements for the continuation of the dialogue. However, there are other pressing issues and reluctance both in Belgrade and in Pristina that make it almost impossible for the dialogue to achieve breakthrough this year. • The February 14 election outcome in Kosovo signaled a significant change both at the socio- political level and on the future of the dialogue with Serbia. For the first time since the negotiations with Serbia began in 2011, Kosovo will be represented by a leader who is openly saying that he will not yield to any international pressure to make “damaging agreements or compromises.” “However, this is not a principled position, but rather aimed at gaining personal political benefit,” a speaker, skeptical of Kurti’s stated objectives, said.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2029 Prospectus
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, acting by and through the Ministry of Finance) €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 Issue price: 98.909 per cent. The €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 (the “Notes”) to be issued by the Republic of Serbia, represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia acting by and through the Ministry of Finance (the “Issuer”) will mature on 26 June 2029 and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest at a rate of 1.500 per cent. per annum. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of the Notes from and including 26 June 2019 and will be payable annually in arrear on 26 June in each year, commencing on 26 June 2020. All payments of principal and interest in respect of the Notes shall be made free and clear of, and without withholding or deduction for, any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by or within the Republic of Serbia (the “Republic of Serbia” or “Serbia”) or any political subdivision or any authority thereof or therein having power to tax, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. In that event, the Issuer shall pay such additional amounts as will result in the receipt by the Noteholders of such amounts as would have been received by them if no such withholding or deduction had been required, subject to certain exceptions set out in the Conditions (as defined below).
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia Guidebook 2013
    SERBIA PREFACE A visit to Serbia places one in the center of the Balkans, the 20th century's tinderbox of Europe, where two wars were fought as prelude to World War I and where the last decade of the century witnessed Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II. Serbia chose democracy in the waning days before the 21st century formally dawned and is steadily transforming an open, democratic, free-market society. Serbia offers a countryside that is beautiful and diverse. The country's infrastructure, though over-burdened, is European. The general reaction of the local population is genuinely one of welcome. The local population is warm and focused on the future; assuming their rightful place in Europe. AREA, GEOGRAPHY, AND CLIMATE Serbia is located in the central part of the Balkan Peninsula and occupies 77,474square kilometers, an area slightly smaller than South Carolina. It borders Montenegro, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina to the west, Hungary to the north, Romania and Bulgaria to the east, and Albania, Macedonia, and Kosovo to the south. Serbia's many waterway, road, rail, and telecommunications networks link Europe with Asia at a strategic intersection in southeastern Europe. Endowed with natural beauty, Serbia is rich in varied topography and climate. Three navigable rivers pass through Serbia: the Danube, Sava, and Tisa. The longest is the Danube, which flows for 588 of its 2,857-kilometer course through Serbia and meanders around the capital, Belgrade, on its way to Romania and the Black Sea. The fertile flatlands of the Panonian Plain distinguish Serbia's northern countryside, while the east flaunts dramatic limestone ranges and basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Defenders in Serbia
    Humanitarian Law Center Research, Documentation and Memory 67 Makenzijeva, 11110 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro Tel/Fax: +381 11 3444 313 +381 11 3444 314 Email: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.hlc.org.yu 26 March 2006 Human Rights Defenders in Serbia Throughout the rule of Slobodan Milošević, Human Rights Organizations and Human Rights Defenders were treated as harmless marginal groups and individuals. Between 1991 and 1999 the regime of Slobodan Milošević did not ban a single anti-war demonstration by nongovernmental organizations because they served as proof to the international community of his ‘democratic’ attitude towards the ‘handful’ that did not support him. The regime and its media paid little attention to the reports of domestic human rights organizations on human rights and humanitarian law violations during the armed conflict because the regime felt secure and supported by the majority of citizens. The period of the NATO bombing campaign from 24 March until 9 June 1999 united the opposition, civil society and regime. Nongovernmental organizations led the way in criticizing the international community and urging the citizens to keep their differences with the government aside as long as bombs kept dropping on the country. It was in those circumstances that several Human Rights Defenders and human rights organizations became the target of government media and secret services above all for publicly pointing out that the regime was taking advantage of the NATO campaign to settle with the Albanians. Because of its attitude during the NATO campaign, the Humanitarian Law Centre (HLC) was twice visited by members of the military security service, who threatened to bring charges of espionage against the HLC Executive Director; also, financial police examined the organization’s accounts and financial records for three weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Normalization Between Kosovo and Serbia
    ADVANCING NORMALIZATION BETWEEN KOSOVO AND SERBIA ADVANCING NORMALIZATION BETWEEN KOSOVO AND SERBIA Council for Inclusive Governance New York, 2017 Contents 4 Preface and Acknowledgments 7 Comprehensive Normalization 11 Parliamentary Cooperation 22 Serb Integration and Serb Albanian Relations 32 Challenges of Establishing the Association/Community 39 Serbia’s Internal Dialogue on Kosovo © Council for Inclusive Governance 2017 3 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Almost twenty years after the war in Kosovo, resolution of the Kosovo-Serbia conflict remains a piece of unfinished business in the Balkans. The process is entering a critical stage. An agreement on comprehensive normalization or a peace treaty under which both sides will commit to mutual respect, peaceful co- existence and hopefully cooperation is within reach. Comprehensive normalization with Kosovo is an obligation for Serbia’s accession to the European Union and is also needed by Pristina in order to move forward. It is unclear, however, what is the most efficient way of getting there. It is not clear how to produce a document that will be acceptable to both sides and a document in the spirit of win-win rather than of win-lose. Since 2010, Serbia and Kosovo have been on a quest to normalize their relations. In Brussels, in 2013, their prime ministers reached the first agreement of principles governing normalization of relations. Implementation deadlines were agreed upon as well. However, five years later the agreement remains to be implemented in full, most notably the provisions on establishing the Association/Community of Serb-Majority Municipalities and on energy. Kosovo’s institutions are not fully functioning in Kosovo’s predominantly ethnically Serb north and Serbia’s parallel administrative institutions continue their existence across Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on HUMAN RIGHTS STATUS of LGBT PERSONS in SERBIA 2011 REPORT PRODUCED BY: Gay Straight Alliance, May 2012
    REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS STATUS OF LGBT PERSONS IN SERBIA 2011 REPORT PRODUCED BY: Gay Straight Alliance, May 2012 COVER ILLUSTRATION: Collage: Dragan Lončar (Clips from the daily media and parts of attack victims’ statements) TRANSLATION: Vesna Gajišin 02 03 C O N T E N T S I INSTEAD OF AN INTRODUCTION 07 II DOES INSTITUTIONAL DISCRIMINATION 08 OF THE LGBT POPULATION EXIST IN SERBIA? III LEGAL FRAMEWORK 10 IV EVENTS OF IMPORTANCE FOR THE 12 STATUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE STATUS OF LGBT PEOPLE IN SERBIA IN 2011 V SUMMARY OF THE REPORT 14 VI THE RIGHT TO LIFE 18 VII INVIOLABILITY OF PHYSICAL 19 AND MENTAL INTEGRITY VIII THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND THE 31 RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND TO A LEGAL REMEDY IX FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND 44 FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION X THE RIGHT TO WORK 58 XI HEALTH CARE 60 XII SOCIAL WELFARE 62 XIII THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION 65 COURT DOCUMENTS 69 02 03 T H A N K S ! Members of Gay Straight Alliance Lawyers of Gay Straight Alliance, Aleksandar Olenik and Veroljub Đukić Victims of violence and discrimination who had the courage to speak out and report their cases Partners from the NGO sector: Belgrade Centre for Human Rights, Belgrade Fund for Political Excellence, E8 Centre, Centre for Modern Skills, Centre for Euro-Atlantic Studies, Centre for Cultural Decontamination, Centre for New Politics, Centre for Youth Work, Centre for Empowerment of Young People Living with HIV / AIDS “AS”, Centre for Gender Alternatives – AlteR, Dokukino, European Movement in Serbia, Centre for Free Elections and Democracy - CeSID, Policy Center, Fractal, Civic Initiatives, Centre “Living Upright”, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikome Se Ne Ponovilo – Genocid U Srebrenici I Borba
    NIKOME SE NE PONOVILO Genocid u Srebrenici i borba protiv zaborava Genocide in Srebrenica and fight against oblivion NEVER AGAIN, TO ANYONE NIKOME SE NE PONOVILO Genocid u Srebrenici i borba protiv zaborava Izdavači Inicijativa mladih za ljudska prava Dobračina 4, 11000 Beograd ForumZFD Srbija Resavska 16a, 11000 Beograd Nezavisno društvo novinara Vojvodine Sutjeska 2, 21000 Novi Sad Urednica Ajla Škrbić Izvršna urednica Ana Pejović Prevodioci Ivana Radović Jelena Dereta Tomislav Brlek Lektura Sandra Zlotrg Ifeta Palić-Kupus Dizajn Ivo Matejin Štampa Izdavanje knjige je podržalo Ministarstvo spolj- Standard 2 nih poslova Savezne Republike Nemačke. Ne- mačka podržava napore u regionu Zapadnog Tiraž Balkana za uspostavljanje participativne kul- 500 ture sećanja, regionalne saradnje i pomirenja. NEVER AGAIN, TO ANYONE Genocide in Srebrenica and fight against oblivion Publishers Youth Initiative for Human Rights Serbia, 4 Dobračina St., 11000 Belgrade ForumZFD Serbia, 16a Resavska St., 11000 Belgrade Independent Journalists’ Association of Vojvodina, 2 Vojvodine Sutjeska St., 21000 Novi Sad Editor Ajla Škrbić Executive editor Ana Pejović Translators Ivana Radović Jelena Dereta Tomislav Brlek Proof reading Sandra Zlotrg Ifeta Palić-Kupus Design Ivo Matejin This publication has been produced with the Printed by support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Standard 2 the Federal Republic of Germany. Germany supports efforts to establish a participatory Number of copies culture of remembrance, regional co-operation 500 and reconciliation in the Western Balkans. SADRŽAJ Riječ urednice 16 PRAVO 21 Genocid u Srebrenici: pravna i moralna analiza Menachem Z. Rosensaft 24 Suočavanje s govorom koji anihilira: poricanje genocida kao oblik nasilja i njegove političke implikacije Roland Moerland 68 Srebrenica, dan poslije: produženi život zločina Lejla Gačanica 92 POLITIKA 113 Zašto nismo..
    [Show full text]
  • Kandidatkinje
    MEDIJSKA SFERA KANDIDATKINJE MONITORING PRISUSTVA ŽENA KANDIDATKINJA U MEDIJIMA TOKOM PREDIZBORNIH KAMPANJA ZA LOKALNE I POKRAJINSKE IZBORE U 2008. Novosadska novinarska škola Novi Sad, 2008. broj 3 1 Izdavači: Novosadska novinarska škola Zmaj Jovina 4/II, Novi Sad tel/fax: (021) 424-164 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.novinarska-skola.org.rs Pokrajinski zavod za ravnopravnost polova Bulevar Mihajla Pupina 16, Novi Sad www.ravnopravnost.org.rs Za izdavače: Mirjana Pušin, direktorka Novosadske novinarske škole Vesna Šijački, direktorka Pokrajinskog zavoda za ravnopravnost polova Urednica zbornika “Kandidatkinje” Doc. dr Dubravka Valić Nedeljković Urednica edicije istraživačkih izveštaja “Medijska sfera” Doc. dr Dubravka Valić Nedeljković Asistentkinje Danja Janjić Milin i Elena Popović Lektura i korektura Mirjana Grubišić Prevod na engleski jezik Danja Janjić Milin Dizajn korica Studio “Inside”, Novi Sad Kompjuterska priprema Emil Otrupčak Štampa NS PRESS, Novi Sad Tiraž 300 primeraka Novi Sad, 2008. Sredstva za objavljivanje publikacije obezbeđena su u budžetu Autonomne Pokrajine Vojvodine Sva prava zadržava izdavač. Za svako korišćenje, umnožavanje i stavljanje u promet dela teksta ili teksta u celini potrebna je saglasnost Novosadske novinarske škole. SADRŽAJ: Vesna Šijački PREDGOVOR . 7 IZVEŠTAJI MONITORINGA PRISUSTVA ŽENA KANDIDATKINJA U MEDIJIMA TOKOM PREDIZBORNIH KAMPANJA ZA LOKALNE I POKRAJINSKE IZBORE U 2008. 11 Višnja Baćanović UVODNIK - “KANDIDATKINJE” MONITORING PRISUSTVA ŽENA KANDIDATKINJA U MEDIJIMA TOKOM PREDIZBORNIH KAMPANJA ZA LOKALNE I POKRAJINSKE IZBORE U 2008. 13 Višnja Baćanović, mr Dejan Pralica, doc. dr Laura Spairosu, Ištvan Kolarš, Eva Radovanović ZASTUPLJENOST ŽENA POLITIČARKI U PREDIZBORNOJ KAMPANJI U MAJU 2008. GODINE U ELEKTRONSKIM I PISANIM MEDIJIMA NA SRPSKOM JEZIKU . 24 3 Višnja Baćanović, Žužana Serenčeš, Ištvan Kolarš ZASTUPLJENOST ŽENA POLITIČARKI U PREDIZBORNOJ KAMPANJI U MAJU 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians
    Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians Ms. Aleksandra Jerkov, President Ms. Delsa Solórzano, Vice‐President (Serbia) (Venezuela) Mr. Ali A. Alaradi, President Ms. Fawzia Koofi Mr. Federico Pinedo Ms. Laurence Dumont (Bahrain) (Afghanistan) (Argentina) (France) Mr. Nassirou Bako‐Arifari Mr. Andrea Caroni Ms. Julie Mukoda Zabwe Mr. David Carter (Benin) (Switzerland) (Uganda) (New Zealand) The Inter-Parliamentary Union, the Headquarters in Geneva (usually in parliamentarian, reinstatement of a world organization of national January) and twice in conjunction previously relinquished parliaments, set up a procedure in with the bi-annual IPU Assemblies parliamentary seat, the effective 1976 for the treatment of (usually March/April and investigation of abuses and legal complaints regarding human rights September/October). On those action against their perpetrators. violations of parliamentarians. It occasions, it examines and adopts entrusted the Committee on the decisions on the cases that have The Committee does everything it Human Rights of Parliamentarians been referred to it. can to nurture a dialogue with the with implementing that procedure. authorities of the countries concerned in its pursuit of a The procedure satisfactory settlement. It is in this Composition The Committee seeks to establish spirit that, during the IPU The Committee is composed of the facts of a given case by Assemblies, the Committee 10 members of parliament, cross-checking and verifying, with regularly meets with the representing the major regions of the authorities of the countries parliamentary delegations of such the world. They are elected in their concerned, the complainants and countries and may suggest sending personal capacity for a mandate of other sources of information, the an on-site mission to help move a five years.
    [Show full text]