DOCSLIB.ORG

Charter Authorizer Accountability Report 2018-19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charter Authorizer Accountability Report 2018-19 TEXAS CHARTER AUTHORIZER ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2018–2019 Submitted to the Texas Education Agency Charter Authorizer Accountability Report 2018–19 School Year Contributing Authors: Toni Templeton Catherine L. Horn Dina Alghazzawi Jeanette Narvaez Binh Bui 3 Texas Charter Authorizer Accountability Report, 2018–19 Acknowledgments The authors of this report are grateful to charter school program staff and research and analysis staff at the Texas Education Agency who were involved in detailed programmatic and method- ological discussions and providing data for analysis and feedback on results. The authors would also like to thank Sherri Lowrey and Diana D’Abruzzo for their assistance throughout the project. Copyright © Notice: The materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and may not be reproduced without the express written per- mission of TEA, except under the following conditions: 1. Texas public school districts, charter schools, and education service centers (ESCs) may reproduce and use copies of the materials and related materials for districts’ and schools’ educational use without obtaining permission from TEA. 2. Residents of the state of Texas may reproduce and use copies of the materials and related materials for individual personal use only without obtaining written permission of TEA. 3. Any portion reproduced must be reproduced in its entirety and remain unedited, unaltered, and unchanged in any way. 4. No monetary fee can be charged for the reproduced materials or any document contain- ing them; however, a reasonable fee to cover only the cost of reproduction and distribu- tion may be charged. Private entities or persons located in Texas that are not public school districts, charter schools, or ESCs or any entity, whether public or private, educational or noneducational, located outside the state of Texas MUST obtain written approval from TEA and will be required to enter into a license agreement that may involve the payment of a licensing fee or a royalty. For information, contact: Copyrights Office, Texas Education Agency, 1701 N. Congress Ave., Austin, TX 78701-1494; phone 512-463-9041; email [email protected]. 4 Texas Charter Authorizer Accountability Report, 2018–19 Table of Contents List of Tables 6 List of Figures 7 List of Acronyms Used in This Report 11 Executive Summary 12 Background 12 Overview of Texas Charter School Campuses 13 Key Findings for SBOE- and ISD-Authorized Charter School Campuses 13 Key Findings for COE-Authorized Charter School Campuses 15 Study Limitations 16 Section 1: Introduction 17 National Charter School Overview 17 Texas Charter Schools 18 Contemporary Texas Charter Legislation 19 Purpose of the Report 19 Data Sources, Definitions, and Research Methods 20 Study Limitations 24 Organization of the Report 25 Section 2: Description of Charter School Campuses and Traditional Public Schools 26 Student Enrollment 28 Section 3: Aggregate Performance of Charter School Campuses by Authorizer Compared to Matched Traditional Public School Campuses 31 Campuses Included in the Aggregate Performance Analysis 31 Attrition Rates 33 STAAR Results 34 Graduation Rates 42 College, Career, and Military Readiness Outcomes 44 TEA Accountability Domain Scores 47 Section 4: Aggregate Performance of Charter School Campuses by School Level and Authorizer Type Compared to Matched Traditional Public School Campuses 50 Attrition Rates Disaggregated by School Level 51 STAAR Results Disaggregated by School Level 52 TEA Accountability Domain Scores Disaggregated by School Level 59 5 Texas Charter Authorizer Accountability Report, 2018–19 Section 5: Analysis of Charter School Campuses Authorized by the COE Compared to Matched Traditional Public School Campuses 64 Campuses Included in the Aggregate Performance Analysis 64 Attrition Rates 66 STAAR Results 66 TEA Accountability Scores 71 Section 6: Discussion of Findings 74 Overview 74 Summary of Results 74 Study Limitations 77 References 78 Appendix A: Detailed Methods Description 80 Appendix B: Aggregate Performance on Additional STAAR Exams for Charter School Campuses by Authorizer Type Compared to Matched Traditional Public School Campuses 85 Appendix C: Campus-Level Performance Results 99 6 Texas Charter Authorizer Accountability Report, 2018–19 List of Tables Table 2.1: Texas Public School Campuses by School Type, 2018–19 26 Table 2.2: Student Enrollment in Texas Public School Campuses by School Type, 2018–19 28 Table 2.3: Demographic Characteristics of Students Enrolled in Texas Public School Campuses, 2018–19 30 Table 3.1: Demographic Characteristics of Charter School Campuses and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses That Were Included in Aggregate Performance Analyses, 2018–19 32 Table 3.2: Percent of College, Career, and Military Ready Graduates by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2017–18 46 Table 5.1: Demographic Characteristics of COE-Authorized Charter School Campuses and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses That Were Included in Aggregate Performance Analyses, 2018–19 65 Appendix C Table C.1: Campus-Level Academic Performance Outcomes for Charter School Campuses and Means for Each Charter School’s Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, Elementary School Campuses Evaluated Under Standard Accountability 99 Table C.2: Campus-Level Academic Performance Outcomes for Charter School Campuses and Means for Each Charter School’s Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, Middle School Campuses Evaluated Under Standard Accountability 127 Table C.3: Campus-Level Academic Performance Outcomes for Charter School Campuses and Means for Each Charter School’s Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, High School Campuses Evaluated Under Standard Accountability 138 Table C.3a: Campus-Level College, Career, and Military Readiness Performance Outcomes for Charter School Campuses and Means for Each Charter School’s Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, High School Campuses Evaluated Under Standard Accountability 146 Table C.4: Campus-Level Academic Performance Outcomes for Charter School Campuses and Means for Each Charter School’s Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, Campuses Evaluated Under Alternative Education Accountability 154 Table C.4a: Campus-Level College, Career, and Military Readiness Performance Outcomes for Charter School Campuses and Means for Each Charter School’s Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, Campuses Evaluated Under Alternative Education Accountability 163 7 Texas Charter Authorizer Accountability Report, 2018–19 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Number of Students Enrolled in Charter Schools in the United States, 2005–06 to 2018–19 17 Figure 3.1: Student Attrition Rates Between 2018–19 and 2019–20 for SBOE-Authorized and ISD-Authorized Charter School Campuses and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses 33 Figure 3.2: Percent of Students Achieving the Approaches Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-Reading Exam by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 34 Figure 3.3: Percent of Students Achieving the Approaches Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-English I and English II End-of-Course Exams by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 35 Figure 3.4: Percent of Students Achieving the Approaches Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-Mathematics Exam by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 36 Figure 3.5: Percent of Students Achieving the Approaches Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-Algebra I End-of-Course Exam by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 37 Figure 3.6: Percent of Students Achieving the Masters Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-Reading Exam by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 38 Figure 3.7: Percent of Students Achieving the Masters Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-English I and English II End-of-Course Exams by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 39 Figure 3.8: Percent of Students Achieving the Masters Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-Mathematics Exam by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 40 Figure 3.9: Percent of Students Achieving the Masters Grade Level Standard on the STAAR-Algebra I End-of-Course Exam by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 41 Figure 3.10: Grade 9 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rates by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, Evaluated Under Standard Accountability Provisions, Class of 2018 42 Figure 3.11: Grade 9 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rates by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, Evaluated Under Alternative Accountability Provisions, Class of 2018 43 Figure 3.12: TEA Accountability Domain Scores by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 48 Figure 3.13: TEA Overall Accountability Rating by Charter Authorizer Type and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, 2018–19 49 Figure 4.1: Student Attrition Rates Between 2018–19 and 2019–20 for Charter School Campuses and Matched Traditional Public School Campuses, by Charter Authorizer Type and School Level 51 8 Texas Charter Authorizer Accountability Report, 2018–19 Figure 4.2: Percent of Students Achieving the Approaches Grade Level Standard on the 2018–19 STAAR-Reading and STAAR-Mathematics
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senator Bettencourt Files SB 28 in the Texas Senate to Create Educational Opportunities for Texas Families
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 11, 2021 Contact: Cristie Strake (512) 463-0107 [email protected] Brian Whitley (510) 495-5542 [email protected] Senator Bettencourt Files SB 28 in the Texas Senate to Create Educational Opportunities for Texas Families Public Education Chair Harold Dutton filed identical companion, HB 3279 in Texas House The Charter School Equity Act will help more Texas students access public schools that meet their needs AUSTIN – Senator Paul Bettencourt (R-Houston) and Chairman Harold Dutton (D-Houston) file The ​ ​ Charter School Equity Act, which levels the playing field for successful public charter schools that are prepared to meet the needs of more Texas families. This bipartisan legislation has 11 joint-authors in the Texas Senate including Senators Birdwell, Buckingham, Campbell, Creighton, Hall, Hughes, Lucio, Paxton, Perry, Springer, and Taylor. Representative Harold Dutton (D-Houston) filed the companion bill, HB 3279, in the House. “Parents deserve to be in the driver’s seat when it comes to the education of their children,” said Senator ​ Bettencourt. “This legislation ensures that public charter schools, which have a remarkably successful ​ track record, can continue to give families access to schools that work for them.” he added. "Public charter schools are meeting the needs of families across Texas," said Representative Harold ​ Dutton. "I'm pleased to work with Senator Bettencourt and my colleagues in the House on this important ​ legislation that will give more students the opportunity to thrive." SB 28 puts parents and students first by preventing local governments from forcing charter schools to follow different rules than ISDs regarding zoning, permitting, and construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Education Agency Overview
    Texas Education Agency Overview 100 - Office of the Commissioner; Senior Policy Advisor The Commissioner's Office provides leadership to schools, manages the Texas Education Agency (TEA), and provides coordination with the state legislature and other branches of state government as well as the U. S. Department of Education. SBOE activities and rules, commissioner rules and regulations, commissioner hearing decisions, coordinates with state legislature, Commissioner’s Correspondence and Complaints Management. Number of FTEs: 6 Correspondence Management Function Description: This function serves to oversee, coordinate, and conduct activities associated with managing and responding to correspondence received by members of the public, local education agencies (LEAs), legislature, and other state agencies. This function operates under the authority of Agency OP 03-01, for which the Office of the Commissioner is the Primary Office of Responsibility (OPR). This function serves as a review and distribution center for correspondence assigned to other offices in coordination with Complaints Management and the Public Information Coordination Office. Complaints Management Function Description: This function serves to oversee, coordinate, and conduct activities associated with managing and responding to complaints received by members of the public. Through various activities, this function ensures that the operations of the Agency’s complaint system is compliant with applicable regulations and policy and effectively meets identified needs of the Agency. This function operates under the authority of Agency OP 04-01, for which the Office of the Commissioner is the Primary Office of Responsibility (OPR). This function mainly serves as a review and distribution center for complaints assigned to other offices in coordination with Correspondence Management and the Public Information Coordination Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. J. W. Edgar Opinion No. (Ci379
    Dr. J. W. Edgar Opinion No. (Ci379) Commissioner of Education Texas Education Agency Re: Whether The Classroom Austin, Texas Teachers of Dallas, a non-profit corporation, is exempt from payment of franchise taxes under Dear Dr. Edgar: stated facts. We quote In Its entirety your letter requesting the opinion of this office on the above captioned question. "The Classroom Teachers of Dallas is incorporated as a non-profit membership organization under the laws of Texas for the following purpose as stated in its charter: 'The purpose for which The Classroom Teachers of Dallas is formed is strictly educational, to-wit: The advancement of public school education in Texas.' ItI am informed that the organization, in pursuit of the stated purpose, engage8 in the following activities: "1 . It publishes and distributes The Dallas Teacher, a periodical including columns designed to provide beneficial information and significant news to the teaching profession. “2 . It distributes to the teachers educational pamphlets and materials printed by the National Education Association and the Texas State Teachers Association. "3. It organizes and assists in organizing Future Teachers of America Clubs in each high school and junior high school and participates extensively in the programs which are designed to provide information to future teachers. -1799- Dr. J.~W. Edgar, Page 2 Opinion No. (C- 379) “4 . It helps organize-. Student. .Education . .Associ- ations in colleges, supplies tnem witn eaucatlon materials and works with them in their programs which look toward teaching as a profession. “5 . It supplies speakers at local, district and state meetings of both Future Teachers of America and Student Education Associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Budget
    2020 – 2021 GOVERNOR’S BUDGET GREG ABBOTT GOVERNOR’S BUDGET 2020-2021 TEXAS GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT Presented to the 86th Texas Legislature February 2019 G O V E R N O R G R E G A B B O T T February 5, 2019 The Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor The Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Speaker Members of Eighty-Sixth Legislature Texas is the envy of the nation. We lead the nation in job creation and boast the fastest-growing economy in America. The unemployment rate in Texas remains at an all-time historic low, while wages continue to rise. This economic success is shared by, and benefits, all Texans. I am especially proud that Texas leads the nation in jobs created by African-American business owners and Hispanic women business owners. The strength of our economy also reflects the diversity of our economy – from aerospace to cybersecurity, financial services to manufacturing, and Fortune 500 companies to small business and startups. You and your colleagues have laid the foundation for this success by passing the laws and appropriating the funds required to create, preserve, and expand the environment for a robust economy: low taxes; light, fair and efficient regulation; public safety; and a free and educated population and workforce. All of these efforts have been pursued while continuing to manage the state budget with proper fiscal constraint and stewardship. Those values that brought us here are essential to carry forward. But there is more we must do. As we begin the 86th Legislative Session, we stand at the threshold of our past achievements and are presented with the opportunity and the duty to ensure that this unparalleled success continues for generations to come.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools
    2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools A Report to the 86th Legislature from the Texas Education Agency March 2019 Submitted to the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and Members of the 86th Texas Legislature. The 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools describes the status of Texas public edu- cation, as required by §39.332 of the Texas Education Code. The report, available on the Texas Education Agency (TEA) website at http://tea.texas.gov/acctres/comp_annual_index.html, contains 16 chapters on the following topics: • state progress on academic performance indicators; • student performance on state assessments; • performance of students at risk of dropping out of school; • students in disciplinary alternative education settings; • secondary school graduates and dropouts; • grade-level retention of students; • district and campus performance in meeting state accountability standards; • status of the curriculum; • charter schools and waivers; • school district expenditures and staff hours used for direct instructional activities; • district reporting requirements; • TEA funds and expenditures; • performance of open-enrollment charters in comparison to school districts; • character education programs; • student health and physical activity; and • Foundation High School Program endorsements. 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools A Report to the 86th Legislature from the Texas Education Agency March 2019 Texas Education Agency Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education Jeff Cottrill, Deputy Commissioner of Standards and Engagement Additional Acknowledgments Special thanks to all Texas Education Agency staff who contributed to this report. Citation. Texas Education Agency. (2019). 2018 comprehensive biennial report on Texas public schools (Document No. GE19 601 07). Austin, TX: Author.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBJECT LIST of TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY OFFICES School Year 2003-2004
    SUBJECT LIST OF TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY OFFICES School Year 2003-2004 Absences-Student 463-9290 Curriculum Development 463-9581 Governmental Relations 463-9682 Academic Achievement Record 463-9581 Curriculum Materials for the Deaf 463-9744 Governance/EEO & Complaints 463-9290 Academic Excellence Indicators 463-9704 DAEP (Disciplinary Alternative Grade Retention Reporting 475-3523 Accelerated Reading Instruction 463-9581 Education Program) 463-9982 Graduation Requirements 463-9581 Accountability Ratings 463-9704 Dana Center—UT 471-6190 Grants Accountability and Data Quality 463-9701 Data Collection—Bulletin 742 463-9809 Discretionary Grants 463-9269 Accountability System for Educator Deaf-Blind, Services for the 463-9414 Formula Funding 463-8525 Prep (ASEP) 1-888-863-5880 Deaf, Services for the 463-9424 Guidance 463-9498 Accounting—(TEA) 463-9189 Decentralization 463-9290 Handicapped Students see Special Ed. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 463-9701 Defensive Driving/ Health Education 463-4326 Administrative Costs 463-8994 Driving Safety Training 997-6500 Health Science Technology (Vocational) 475-3491 Adult Education 713-696-0700 Discipline Management 463-9982 Hearing-Impaired, Services for the 463-9424 GED (General Education Discretionary Grants 463-9269 Hearings & Appeals 463-9727 Development) 463-9292 Distance Learning 936-2265 High School Completion & Student Support 463-9322 Advanced Academic Services 463-9581 Distinguished Achievement Program 463-9455 High School Education 919-5420 Advanced Placement Exam 463-9581 District & Campus
    [Show full text]
  • January 22,200L Mr. Jim Nelson Commissioner of Education Texas
    OFFKE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. STATE OP TEXAS JOHN CORNYN January 22,200l Mr. Jim Nelson Opinion No. X-0333 Commissioner of Education Texas Education Agency Re: Whether section 323.019 of the Government 1701 North Congress Avenue Code authorizes the Texas Education Agency to Austin, Texas 78701-1494 release to the Texas Legislative Council student information that is confidential under federal law (RQ-0312-JC) Dear Commissioner Nelson: The Texas Education Agency (“TEA”) possesses personally identifiable information from education records that is confidential under federal law, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974,20 U.S.C. 5 1232g (1994 & Supp. IV 1998) (“FERPA”). FERPA allows release of such personally identifiable information without parental consent only under certain circumstances, including for example, to state and local education authorities for certain purposes. Section 323.019 of the Govermnent Code provides that employees of the Texas Legislative Council are state school officials for purposes ofFERPA. You ask whether that state statute authorizes the Texas Education Agency to release to the Texas Legislative Council personally identifiable information that is confidential under FERPA. We conclude that it does not. Before turning to FERPA’s provisions governing release of education records, we begin with a brief discussion of the Texas Legislative Council and section 323.019. Pursuant to chapter 323 ofthe Government Code, the Texas Legislative Council (the “Council”), an agency ofthe legislative branch of state government, consists of the Lieutenant Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the chairs of the Senate and House administration committees, four additional Senators, and nine additional members of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Policy in Texas: A
    Water Policy in Texas: A Comprehensive Overview The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment Environmental Defense Fund Non-Governmental (EDF) Organizations (NGOs) Acronym U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) List Nonpoint Source Pollution Bay/Basin Stakeholder General Land Office (GLO) (NPS) Committee (BBASC) Groundwater Availability Pesticide General Permit Bay/Basin Expert Science Models (GAMs) (PGP) Team (BBEST) Groundwater Conservation Priority Groundwater Best Management Practices Districts (GCDs) Management Area (PGMA) (BMP) Groundwater Management Office of Compliance and The Clean Water Act (CWA) Areas (GMAs) Enforcement (OCE) Coastal Barriers Resource Habitat Conservation Plans Regional Water Planning Act (CBRA) (HCPs) Areas (RWPAs) Coastal Coordination Council House Bill (HB) Regional Water Planning (CCC) Groups (RWPGs) Informal Science Efforts Coastal Erosion Planning and (ISE) Recreational Water Quality Response Act (CEPRA) Criteria (RWQC) Integrated Water Resource Coastal Management Management (IWRM) Science Teachers Association Program (CMP) of Texas (STAT) International Boundary Coastal Zone Management Commission (IBC) Senate Bill (SB) Act (CZMA) International Boundary and State Board of Education Community Rating Systems Water Commission (IBWC) (SBOE) (CRS) Kay Bailey Hutchison State Water Implementation Compensation and Liability Desalination Plant (KBHDP) Fund for Texas (SWIFT) Act of 1980 (CERCLA) Lower Colorado River Storm Water Management Desired Future Conditions Authority (LCRA) Program (SWMP) (DFCs) Millions
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Retailers Come Through for Public Education and Veterans with Record Lottery Sales and Revenue
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MEDIA CONTACT: Media Relations, 512-344-5131 [email protected] TEXAS RETAILERS COME THROUGH FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AND VETERANS WITH RECORD LOTTERY SALES AND REVENUE Texas Lottery surpasses all-time sales record with new $6.7 billion mark in FY 2020 (AUSTIN) – The hard work and dedication of Texas Lottery retailers – essential businesses serving their communities throughout the COVID-19 health crisis – enabled the Texas Lottery to achieve $6.704 billion in sales during its 10th-consecutive record-breaking year, a $452.5 million increase (7.2%) over FY 2019. This achievement also resulted in a record total contribution of $1.684 billion for Texas education and veterans. “Never in the 28-year history of the Texas Lottery has a year unfolded quite like Fiscal Year 2020 did, and our success is attributed first and foremost to our hard-working retailers,” said Gary Grief, executive director of the Texas Lottery. “Understanding that nearly all of the 20,000 retail locations where lottery tickets are sold were deemed ‘essential service’ locations, we are proud to close out this fiscal year with a new sales record, and more importantly, provide another record-breaking year of revenue for public schools and veterans’ services in Texas.” This year’s revenue transfer included $1.661 billion to the Foundation School Fund and $22.2 million to the Fund for Veterans’ Assistance, the Texas Lottery’s largest contributions to Texas education and Texas veterans to-date. The Texas Lottery has now contributed more than $25.7 billion to Texas public education and more than $142 million to Texas veterans since the dedication of such funds by the Texas Legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Education Agency, Austin. Office of Education *Federal
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 369 912 CE 066 323 TITLE School-to-Work Transition. A Texas Perspective. INSTITUTION Texas Education Agency, Austin. Office of Education of Special Populations and Adults.; Texas State Dept. of Commerce, Austin. PUB DATE 93 NOTE 179p. PUB TYPE Reports - General (140) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Demonstration Programs; *Education Work Relationship; *Federal Programs; Integrated Curriculum; *Job Skills; *Labor Force Development; Labor Market; Policy Formation; Public Policy; School Business Relationship; Secondary Education; *State Programs; Statewide Planning IDENTIFIERS *Texas ABSTRACT This document examines the school-to-work transition issue from a state, national, and global perspective. Chapter 1 explores problems facing youths entering the job market, demands of the global marketplace and changing economy, critical skills needed by workers, and benefits of integrating academic and workplace skills in the classroom. Chapter 2 examines how the United States' chief competitors--Japan, England, Germany, Sweden, and Denmark--are educating their workers. Chapter 3 looks at models for integrating school and the workplace. Chapter 4 considers national policies and initiatives; Chapter 5 explores Texas policy and initiatives. Chapter 6 examines promising school-to-work efforts in other states. Chapter 7 looks at examples of school-to-work transition efforts and promising practices in Texas schools and communities. Chapter 8 offers examples of how teachers can integrate skills and competencies recommended by the Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS) into classroom activities. Chapter 9 offers strategies counselors and parents can use to help prepare young people for the world of work. Chapter 10 offers suggestions on how schools and businesses can form partnerships, how teachers can incorporate job-related elements into classrooms, and how employers can support the school-to-work transition process.
    [Show full text]
  • Foster Care & Student Success
    FOSTER CARE & STUDENT SUCCESS: Texas Systems Working Together to Transform Education Outcomes of Students in Foster Care PRODUCED BY ™ ™ FOSTER CARE & STUDENT SUCCESS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS STATE OF TEXAS COLLABORATION Supreme Court of Texas, Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families (Children’s Commission) Texas Education Agency Katie Brown Michael L. Williams Staff Attorney Commissioner of Education Texas Department of Family and Protective Services Tiffany Roper Assistant Director The Honorable John J. Specia, Jr. Commissioner Supreme Court of Texas, Permanent Judicial Commission SPECIAL APPRECIATION FOR AGENCY for Children, Youth and Families (Children’s Commission) LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT The Honorable Eva Guzman Texas Education Agency Justice, Supreme Court of Texas Chair, Children’s Commission Anita Givens Associate Commissioner Standards and Programs DEVELOPMENT TEAM AND Gene Lenz CONTENT CONTRIBUTORS Division Director Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education Policy Kelly Kravitz Jan Lindsey Foster Care Education & Policy Coordinator Assistant Director Division of Federal and State Education Policy Division of Federal and State Education Policy W. Montgomery Meitler Stacy Avery Assistant Counsel & Confidentiality Officer T-STEM & Mathematics/Science Partnerships Office of Legal Services Division of Federal and State Education Policy Julie Wayman Student Success Programs Director Texas Department of Family and Protective Services Division of Federal and State Education Policy Audrey Deckinga Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • A Training Module for Capacity Building May 2006 Page 1 Table of Contents
    INTRODUCTION TO BILINGUAL EDUCATION: LEGAL ISSUES, TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY GUIDELINES, MODELS AND RESEARCH A TRAINING MODULE PUBLISHED AS PART OF THE LEP STUDENT SUCCESS INITIATIVE GRANT Department of P-16 Initiatives Texas Education Agency In Collaboration with The Institute for Second Language Achievement (ISLA) Texas A&M University at Corpus Christi And The Advocacy Systems for Education Cedar Park, Texas May, 2006 A Training Module for Capacity Building May 2006 Page 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION I. THE EVOLUTION OF BILINGUAL EDUCATION • Early Beginnings • Language Minority Students • Limited English Speaking Ability [LESA] • Limited English Proficient [LEP] • English Language Learners [ELL] II. STATE DEMOGRAPHICS • Enrollment Trends [Overall] • Enrollment Trends [Language Minority] • Enrollment Trends [LEP] • Grade Levels Impacted by Enrollment Growth • Implications of Rapid Growth • Teacher Diversity and Availability III. BILINGUAL EDUCATION MANDATES • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 • Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1968 • OCR National Origin Memorandum • Lau vs. Nichols • Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974 • Lau Remedies • Bilingual Education Legislation in Texas • Civil Action 5281 • Senate Bill 477 • Title III IV. STATE’S CURRENT POLICY, 19 TAC CHAPTER 89 • Policy and Implementing Regulations • Definitions • When is Bilingual Education or ESL required? • Exceptions and Waivers • Program Content; Method of Instruction • Enrollment of Students • Facilities and Classes • Assignment of Teachers to a Program • Compliance with Statute • Language Proficiency Assessment Committees • Evaluation A Training Module for Capacity Building May 2006 Page 2 V. PROGRAM MODELS • Bilingual Education • Dual Language Immersion • ESL VI. THE TEXAS SUCCESSFUL SCHOOLS STUDY • Background • Purpose • Design • Scope • Criteria for Participation • Findings VII.
    [Show full text]