2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools

A Report to the 86th Legislature from the Texas Education Agency March 2019

Submitted to the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and Members of the 86th Texas Legislature.

The 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools describes the status of Texas public education, as required by §39.332 of the Texas Education Code. The report, available on the Texas Education Agency (TEA) website at http://tea.texas.gov/acctres/comp_annual_index.html, contains 16 chapters on the following topics: • state progress on academic performance indicators; • student performance on state assessments; • performance of students at risk of dropping out of school; • students in disciplinary alternative education settings; • secondary school graduates and dropouts; • grade-level retention of students; • district and campus performance in meeting state accountability standards; • status of the curriculum; • charter schools and waivers; • school district expenditures and staff hours used for direct instructional activities; • district reporting requirements; • TEA funds and expenditures; • performance of open-enrollment charters in comparison to school districts; • character education programs; • student health and physical activity; and • Foundation High School Program endorsements.

2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools

A Report to the 86th Legislature from the Texas Education Agency March 2019

Texas Education Agency Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education Jeff Cottrill, Deputy Commissioner of Standards and Engagement

Additional Acknowledgments Special thanks to all Texas Education Agency staff who contributed to this report.

Citation. Texas Education Agency. (2019). 2018 comprehensive biennial report on Texas public schools (Document No. GE19 601 07). Austin, TX: Author.

For general information about this report, contact the Texas Education Agency Division of Research and Analysis at (512) 475-3523 or the Office of Standards and Engagement at (512) 463-8934. For additional information on specific issues, contact the agency staff listed at the end of each chapter. This report is available on the Texas Education Agency website at http://tea.texas.gov/acctres/ comp_annual_index.html.

Copyright © Notice. The materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of TEA, except under the following conditions: (1) Texas public school districts, charter schools, and Education Service Centers may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for the districts' and schools' educational use without obtaining permission from TEA; (2) residents of the state of Texas may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for individual personal use only without obtaining written permission of TEA; (3) any portion reproduced must be reproduced in its entirety and remain unedited, unaltered and unchanged in any way; and (4) no monetary charge can be made for the reproduced materials or any document containing them; however, a reasonable charge to cover only the cost of reproduction and distribution may be charged. Private entities or persons located in Texas that are not Texas public school districts, Texas Education Service Centers, or Texas charter schools or any entity, whether public or private, educational or non-educational, located outside the state of Texas MUST obtain written approval from TEA and will be required to enter into a license agreement that may involve the payment of a licensing fee or a royalty. For information contact: Copyrights Office, Texas Education Agency, 1701 N. Congress Ave., Austin, TX 78701-1494; phone 512-463-9041; email: [email protected]. Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS™), State Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR®), and studentGPS® are either registered trademarks or trademarks of the Texas Education Agency. Advanced Placement Program®, AP®, and SAT® are registered trademarks of the College Entrance Examination Board. ACT Assessment® is a registered trademark of the ACT, Inc. Fitnessgram® is a registered trademark of The Cooper Institute. Career Clusters® is a registered trademark of the National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium. Other product and company names mentioned in this report may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

ii 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools

Contents 1. Performance Indicators ...... 1 2. Student Performance ...... 51 3. Performance of Students At Risk of Dropping Out of School...... 81 4. Disciplinary Alternative Education Programs ...... 91 5. Graduates and Dropouts ...... 97 6. Grade-Level Retention ...... 117 7. District and Campus Performance ...... 129 8. Status of the Curriculum ...... 193 9. Charter Schools and Waivers ...... 207 10. Expenditures and Staff Hours for Direct Instructional Activities ...... 211 11. District Reporting Requirements ...... 213 12. Agency Funds and Expenditures ...... 217 13. Performance of Open-Enrollment Charters ...... 221 14. Character Education ...... 225 15. Student Health and Physical Activity ...... 227 16. Foundation High School Program Endorsements ...... 231

2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools iii

iv 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools

1. Performance Indicators

his chapter of the 2018 Comprehensive Biennial ♦ Meet Texas Success Initiative (TSI) criteria in Eng- Report on Texas Public Schools presents the lish language arts (ELA)/reading and mathematics. T progress the state is making on the performance A graduate meeting the TSI college readiness indicators established in Texas law. These indicators standards in both ELA/reading and mathematics; were presented in Academic Excellence Indicator Sys- specifically, meeting the college-ready criteria on tem (AEIS) reports from 1990-91 to 2011-12. In the the TSI assessment, SAT, or ACT, or by success- 2012-13 school year, the AEIS was renamed the Texas fully completing and earning credit for a college Academic Performance Report (TAPR) to reflect prep course as defined in Texas Education Code changes in legislation. §28.014, in both ELA and mathematics. The assessment results considered include TSI assess- Detailed analyses of three key performance indicators ments through October 2017, SAT, and ACT. A can be found in Chapters 2 and 5 of this report. Chapter graduate must meet the TSI requirement for both 2 presents State of Texas Assessments of Academic reading and mathematics but does not necessarily Readiness (STAAR) results, and Chapter 5 presents need to meet them on the same assessment. For graduation rates and dropout rates. example, a graduate may meet the TSI criteria for This chapter presents results for other measures and in- college readiness in ELA/reading on the SAT and dicators presented in the TAPR (pages 5-50) that were complete and earn credit for a college prep course used in state accountability domain calculations and in in mathematics. distinction designation calculations, including the fol- ♦ Meet criteria on AP/IB examination. A graduate lowing: meeting the criterion score on an AP or IB exami- ♦ college, career, and military readiness (CCMR); nation in any subject area. Criterion score is 3 or more for AP and 4 or more for IB. ♦ student progress; ♦ Earn dual course credits. A graduate completing ♦ economically disadvantaged percentage; and earning credit for at least three credit hours in ♦ Advanced Placement (AP)/International Baccalau- ELA or mathematics or at least nine credit hours in reate (IB) results; any subject.

♦ SAT/ACT results; ♦ Enlist in the armed forces. A graduate enlisting in the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, or ♦ advanced course/dual enrollment completion; Marines. ♦ English language proficiency; ♦ Earn an industry-based certification. A graduate ♦ attendance rate; and earning an industry-based certification under Title 19 of the Texas Administrative Code §74.1003. ♦ profile information on students, programs, and staff. ♦ Earn an associate degree. A graduate earning an associate degree while in high school.

♦ Graduate with completed individualized education College, Career, and Military program (IEP) and workforce readiness. A gradu- Readiness ate receiving a graduation type code of 04, 05, 54, or 55, which indicates the student has completed The CCMR component of the Student Achievement do- his or her IEP and has either demonstrated self- main measures graduates' preparedness for college, the employment with self-help skills to maintain workforce, or the military. Annual graduates demon- employment or has demonstrated mastery of spe- strate college, career, or military readiness in any one of cific employability and self-help skills that do not the following ways. require public school services.

Note. The STAAR results shown in the TAPR state performance report (pages 5-50) differ by 1 or 2 percentage points from those reported in Chapter 2 of this report. The TAPR indicators, which form the basis for the state accountability system, reflect the performance of only those students who were enrolled in the same districts as of October of each school year. This ensures that accountability ratings are based only on the performance of students who have been in the same districts for most of the academic year. Chapter 2 contains the results for all students who took the STAAR in the spring of each year, regardless of their enrollment status the previous October.

2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools 1

♦ Career and technical education (CTE) coherent In 2018, the STAAR progress measure results were sequence coursework aligned with industry-based used in the School Progress, Part A: Academic Growth certifications. A CTE coherent sequence graduate and Closing the Gaps domain calculations. The School who has completed and received credit for at least Progress, Part A calculation credited districts and cam- one CTE course aligned with an industry-based puses with one point for results that Met or Exceeded certification. This indicator awards one-half point growth expectations, while results that maintained pro- only for graduates who have met no other CCMR ficiency but Did Not Meet growth expectations earned indicator. These graduates receive one-half point one-half point. STAAR progress measure results were credit for coursework completed toward an also used in the Academic Achievement in English industry-based certification. Language Arts/Reading, Academic Achievement in Mathematics, Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic For the class of 2017, 53 percent of graduates were Growth, and Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the considered college ready in reading, and 42 percent Gaps distinction designation calculations. were considered college ready in mathematics. Overall for the class of 2017, 38 percent were considered In the 2017 ratings cycle: 59 percent of tests Met or Ex- college ready in both subjects. ceeded growth expectations, and 17 percent Exceeded growth expectations in reading; and 64 percent of tests For the class of 2016, 51 percent of graduates were Met or Exceeded growth expectations, and 20 percent considered college ready in reading, 45 percent were Exceeded growth expectations in mathematics. considered college ready in mathematics, and 39 percent were considered college ready in both subjects. In the 2018 ratings cycle: 63 percent of tests Met or Exceeded progress, and 20 percent Exceeded progress in reading; and 63 percent of tests Met or Exceeded Student Progress progress, and 20 percent Exceeded progress in mathematics. The STAAR progress measure indicates the amount of improvement or growth a student has made from year to year. For STAAR assessments (with or without Economically Disadvantaged accommodations), progress is measured as a student's gain score, the difference between the scaled score a Percentage student achieved in the prior year and the scaled score The economically disadvantaged percentage shows the a student achieved in the current year. Individual percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price student progress is then categorized as Limited, lunch or eligible for other public assistance as reported Expected, or Accelerated. If a student's progress in the Texas Student Data System/Public Education measure is Expected, he or she Met growth expecta- Information Management System (TSDS/PEIMS) fall tions. If the student's progress measure is Accelerated, snapshot. Statewide, the economically disadvantaged he or she Exceeded growth expectations. rate in 2017-18 (58.8%) decreased slightly from the rate For STAAR Alternate 2 assessments, the progress (59.0%) in 2016-17. The economically disadvantaged measure is based on a student's stage change from the percentage was used in the School Progress, Part B: prior year to the current year. A student's stage for each Relative Performance domain and to construct campus year is determined by the student's scaled score comparison groups, which are used to award distinction achieved on the assessment. The student's stages of designations. performance from the prior year and the current year are then compared to assign the student a progress indicator, which is a determination of whether the Advanced Placement and progress made is sufficient to designate the student as having Met or Exceeded growth expectations. International Baccalaureate Results In 2017, STAAR and English learner (EL) progress High school students who take the College Board's measures were used. For each subject area and student Advanced Placement (AP) or the International Bacca- group evaluated, the Index 2 calculation credited laureate Organization's International Baccalaureate (IB) districts and campuses with one point for each percent- examinations may receive advanced placement or age of tests that Met or Exceeded growth expectations course credit, or both, upon entering college. Generally, and one point for each percentage of tests that Exceeded colleges award credit or advanced placement for scores growth expectations. The percentage of tests that at or above 3 on AP examinations and 4 on IB examina- Exceeded growth expectations was also an indicator tions. AP/IB participation and performance were for distinction designations in ELA/reading and evaluated for distinction designations in ELA/reading, mathematics. mathematics, science, and social studies, and for the postsecondary readiness distinction designation. AP/IB

2 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools course completion results were also an indicator in the credit, and other courses designated as academically ad- CCMR components of the Student Achievement and vanced. Course completion information is reported by the Closing the Gaps domains. districts through TSDS/PEIMS after the close of the school year. For 2018 ratings, these results were used in Statewide, the percentage of 11th and 12th graders determining the distinction designations for academic taking at least one AP or IB examination rose from achievement in ELA/reading, mathematics, science, 25.5 percent in 2016 to 26.2 percent in 2017. The per- social studies, and postsecondary readiness. Completing centage of examinees with at least one score at or above and earning at least three credit hours in ELA or mathe- criterion decreased slightly statewide from 49.5 percent matics or at least nine credit hours in any subject was in 2016 to 49.1 percent in 2017. also an indicator in the CCMR components of the Stu- dent Achievement and the Closing the Gaps domains. SAT/ACT Results In 2017, the most recent year for which data were available, 55.4 percent of students in Grades 11-12 com- The TAPR presents participation and performance re- pleted at least one advanced course, an increase from sults for the SAT, published by the College Board, and 55.0 percent in 2016. Across racial/ethnic groups in the ACT, published by ACT, Inc. SAT and ACT results 2017, percentages of students completing advanced were used in determining distinction designations for courses ranged from 45.0 percent for African American academic achievement in ELA/reading, mathematics, students to 82.5 percent for Asian students. Between science, and postsecondary readiness. SAT and ACT 2016 and 2017, the percentages of students completing results were also an indicator in the CCMR components advanced courses increased for all but 3 of the 15 stu- of the Student Achievement and the Closing the Gaps dent groups. domains. The percentage of graduates who took either the SAT or the ACT increased from 71.6 percent for the class of English Language Proficiency 2016 to 73.5 percent for the class of 2017. Of the class New to the 2018 accountability system, the English of 2017 examinees, 22.3 percent scored at or above Language Proficiency (ELP) component measures an criterion on either test (1110 on the SAT or 24 on the English learner's (EL's) progress towards achieving ACT), a slight decrease from 22.5 percent for the class English language proficiency. The ELP component of 2016. evaluates the Texas English Language Proficiency As- The average SAT total score (evidence-based reading sessment System (TELPAS) results for Grades K-12. and writing, plus mathematics) for the class of 2017 A student is considered to have made progress if the was 1019. Note that, in 2016, the SAT underwent student advances by at least one score of the composite changes that modified both the structure of the test and rating from the prior year to the current year or if the the scoring method. Scores for the small percentage of student's result is Advanced High. Current ELs are the students in the class of 2017 who took the SAT only students evaluated in this component. As a result examination prior to March 2016 were converted to of changes to TELPAS, the 2018 ELP component eval- corresponding scores on the redesigned SAT using the uated TELPAS results from 2016-17 and 2015-16. If a College Board's concordance tables. Results for the 2015-16 composite rating was not available, the compo- class of 2016 and earlier classes are not comparable to site rating from 2014-15 was used. If a 2014-15 compo- results for the class of 2017 and later classes. site rating was not available, the composite rating from 2013-14 was used. English language proficiency was The average ACT composite score for the class of 2017 used in the Closing the Gaps domain calculations. was 20.3, the same as for the class of 2016. Statewide, 53 percent of EL students showed progress towards achieving English language proficiency. Advanced Course/Dual-Credit Completion Attendance Rate The percentage of students completing advanced/dual- Attendance rates are calculated for students in Grades 1 credit courses is based on the number of students through 12 in all Texas public schools. The attendance who complete and receive credit for at least one ad- rate indicator applies to all four subject areas (ELA/ vanced or dual-credit course. This data is available for reading, mathematics, science, and social studies) dis- Grades 9-12 and Grades 11-12. Advanced courses in- tinction designations. Statewide, the attendance rate for clude AP courses, IB courses, dual-credit courses for 2016-17 (95.7%) decreased slightly from the rate for which students can earn both high school and college 2015-16 (95.8%).

2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools 3

Profile Information Other Sources of Information In addition to performance data, the TAPR provides Texas Academic Performance Reports and profiles for descriptive statistics on a variety of student, program, each public school district and campus are available and staff data. from each district and on the Texas Education Agency website at http://tea.texas.gov/accountability/.

Agency Contact Persons For more information about the Texas Academic Performance Report indicators, contact Jeff Cottrill, Deputy Commissioner of Standards and Engagement, (512) 463-8934; or Jamie Crowe, Performance Report- ing, (512) 463-9704.

4 2018 Comprehensive Biennial Report on Texas Public Schools

Schools 2018 Comprehensive Public Biennial onReport Texas