Putting the Squeeze on Axions Karl Van Bibber, Konrad Lehnert, and Aaron Chou

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Putting the Squeeze on Axions Karl Van Bibber, Konrad Lehnert, and Aaron Chou Putting the squeeze on axions Karl van Bibber, Konrad Lehnert, and Aaron Chou Citation: Physics Today 72, 6, 48 (2019); doi: 10.1063/PT.3.4227 View online: https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4227 View Table of Contents: https://physicstoday.scitation.org/toc/pto/72/6 Published by the American Institute of Physics ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN When condensed-matter physics became king Physics Today 72, 30 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4110 Helium users are at the mercy of suppliers Physics Today 72, 26 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4181 Paul Dirac and the Nobel Prize in Physics Physics Today 72, 46 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4342 Commentary: Basic research in a time of crisis Physics Today 72, 10 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4194 Ernest Lawrence’s brilliant failure Physics Today 72, 32 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4162 John Wheeler’s H-bomb blues Physics Today 72, 42 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4364 Karl van Bibber is a professor of nuclear engineering and associate dean for research of the College of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Konrad Lehnert is a professor of physics and JILA Fellow at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and the National Institute of Science and Technology. Aaron Chou is a senior scientist at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois. Putting the squeeze ON AXIONS Karl van Bibber, Konrad Lehnert, and Aaron Chou Microwave cavity experiments make a quantum leap in the search for the dark matter of the universe. ixty years ago Norman Ramsey and collaborators 1 part in 10 billion—just by dumb luck. asserted that the neutron’s electric dipole moment Or not? In 1977 Stanford University physicists Roberto Peccei and Helen (EDM)—a measure of the separation of its positive Quinn conceived a minimal and ap- and negative electric charge—was consistent with pealing theory by which θ would be S promoted to a dynamical variable. Just 1 zero. More precisely, their experiment bounded below some large energy scale, θ the neutron’s EDM at less than 5 × 10−20 e·cm. Today, that limit is would assume a random value at each 3×10−26 e·cm, and experiments under development may push it point in space. But in the low-energy limit of the theory, the nontrivial “wash- lower by a factor of 100. board” potential of the QCD vacuum would drive θ to the CP-conserving In the parlance of fundamental symmetries, the strong in- minimum. That would be nice and tidy. teraction is seemingly protected from CP-violating effects, where However, within a few months, Steven Weinberg and Frank CP is the product operator of charge conjugation C and parity Wilczek independently realized that the remnant sloshing of P. In the 1950s theorists had no compelling reason to expect CP the θ field around that minimum implied the existence of an violation—indeed, Tsung-Dao Lee and Chen Ning Yang did elementary particle called the axion—the smoking gun of Pec- not believe that a nonzero neutron EDM would ever be found, cei and Quinn’s theory—whose mass is possibly a trillion times though it was a worthy experimental question. However, with lighter than an electron. Even such a light particle could, if suf- the advent of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) in the 1970s, ficiently abundant, constitute the 27% of the mass–energy of a major problem loomed: The theory unavoidably includes a the universe that is dark mater. CP-violating angle θ associated with topological configurations The story of the axion and its connection to dark mater is of the QCD gluon field. For any generic value of θ, the neutron delightfully told with deep physical intuition in the form of a EDM should be a whopping 10−16 e·cm. The value implied by fable in which graduate students play snooker on Mars (see the experiment is highly improbable: It’s as if you spun a roulete article by Pierre Sikivie, PHYSICS TODAY, December 1996, page 22). wheel, and it came to rest at the winning number to within In the current article, we focus on the ongoing experimental 48 PHYSICS TODAY | JUNE 2019 Axion receiver for the HAYSTAC experiment. JUNE 2019 | PHYSICS TODAY 49 AXIONS Preamplifier hunt for the axion more than two decades later. To date, the most sensitive Δff/~10−6 searches rely on the fact that the Magnet Cavity Magnet axion couples to two photons. However, one may represent an POWER external magnetic field as a sea of fmch2 virtual photons, and as Pierre =/a Sikivie realized in 1983, a massive γ FREQUENCY axion can be converted into a sin- FIGURE 1. THE SEARCH FOR AXIONS, gle real photon in an external a in principle magnetic field with the same total B and practice. In this schematic, an axion can scatter from a virtual photon associated with the magnetic energy. What’s more, the axion– γ* field B and produce in the cavity (green) a single photon conversion can be reso- real photon that can be read out and amplified. The nantly enhanced in a high-Q cav- resulting power spectrum illustrates how the signal ity.2 (See the article by van Bibber × would appear after the conversion of axions into and Leslie Rosenberg, PHYSICS m f photons; a is the mass of an axion and is its TODAY, August 2006, page 30.) frequency. Listening to the radio Sikivie’s proposed scheme was simplicity itself, and the exper- below, where T is the physical temperature) and the noise ac- iments of today closely resemble larger and more technologi- cruing from the amplifier, TA: cally sophisticated incarnations of his first experiments 30 years kT hν 1 1 kT ago. The new experiments boast a state-of-the-art low-noise BN=++.h/kTν BA ()e−1B 2 amplifier that is coupled to a tunable microwave cavity inserted in the bore of a powerful superconducting solenoid magnet,3 Half of the irreducible single quantum of noise hν comes from as shown in figure 1. the vacuum fluctuations of the cavity, even at zero temperature, The cavity is tuned in small steps. At each frequency, the re- and half comes from the linear amplifier itself. A convenient searchers pause for several minutes and listen for the signal— benchmark to keep in mind is that kBTSQL ≈ 50 mK at 1 GHz. At an excess of power over the noise floor—if the resonance con- high temperatures, kBT >> hν and TN ≈ T + TA. 2 dition is fulfilled, hν = mac . Here, ma is the axion mass, ν the The first microwave cavity experiments in the late 1980s at cavity frequency, and h Planck’s constant, with 1 GHz corre- Brookhaven National Laboratory and the University of Florida sponding to an axion mass of roughly 4 μeV. Think of the ex- used transistor-based amplifiers (heterojunction field-effect periment as a revved-up version of your car’s radio receiver. transistors that operated with system noise temperatures typ- The search strategy is dictated by the Dicke radiometer ically 5–20 K), some 200 times the standard quantum limit, TSQL, equation, over the 1–3 GHz frequency range. In the mid 1990s, the first S P t large-scale experiment, the Axion Dark Mater Experiment s (ADMX), began taking data. It used the best broadband ampli- N = kT · ν , BN Δ fiers of its time; based on high-electron-mobility transistors, those amplifiers steadily improved the noise temperature to where S/N is the signal-to-noise ratio, P is the signal power, k S B about 100 TSQL at subgigahertz frequencies. is Boltzmann’s constant, and TN is the system noise tempera- By virtue of its large volume cavity, ADMX had scanned a ture. The factors under the square root are the integration time significant range in mass at one of two representative axion– t at each step and the bandwidth of the axion signal Δν. photon couplings—corresponding to one variant of the KSVZ Although deceptively simple in concept, the experiment is (named for Jihn Eui Kim, Mikhail Shifman, Arkady Vainshtein, one of the most daunting endeavors in physics today. Three and Valentin Zakharov) family of models regarded by the axion factors complicate it. First, one must scan a range of axion community as a useful experimental goalpost. But delving much masses over at least three decades. Because the search is nar- deeper into the model space seemed out of reach. Furthermore, rowband, each decade must be covered by dint of many mil- the scanning rate was unacceptably slow. Unless much beter lions of tiny steps. Second, even for the most favorable axion– amplifiers were devised, the search for dark-mater axions photon couplings predicted, and in the largest such experiment, seemed headed for an abrupt dead end. the anticipated signal power is measured in units of yoctowats, a trillionth of a trillionth of a wat. Third—and herein lies the Closing in on the quantum real rub—unless one gets clever, a fundamental, irreducible The axion experiment unexpectedly gained a new lease on life noise floor set by quantum mechanics prevails for standard with a chance conversation during a 1994 workshop at the Uni- linear amplifiers. versity of California, Berkeley. Speaking to Leslie Rosenberg Known as the standard quantum limit (SQL), the noise floor and one of us (van Bibber), then ADMX spokespersons, John is expressed in terms of a temperature as kBTSQL = hν. More Clarke ventured that he could make gigahertz amplifiers based precisely, the system noise consists of a sum of two com - on superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs).
Recommended publications
  • Particle & Nuclear Physics Quantum Field Theory
    Particle & Nuclear Physics Quantum Field Theory NOW AVAILABLE New Books & Highlights in 2019-2020 ON WORLDSCINET World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics - Vol 83 Lectures of Sidney Coleman on Quantum Field Field Theory Theory A Path Integral Approach Foreword by David Kaiser 3rd Edition edited by Bryan Gin-ge Chen (Leiden University, Netherlands), David by Ashok Das (University of Rochester, USA & Institute of Physics, Derbes (University of Chicago, USA), David Griffiths (Reed College, Bhubaneswar, India) USA), Brian Hill (Saint Mary’s College of California, USA), Richard Sohn (Kronos, Inc., Lowell, USA) & Yuan-Sen Ting (Harvard University, “This book is well-written and very readable. The book is a self-consistent USA) introduction to the path integral formalism and no prior knowledge of it is required, although the reader should be familiar with quantum “Sidney Coleman was the master teacher of quantum field theory. All of mechanics. This book is an excellent guide for the reader who wants a us who knew him became his students and disciples. Sidney’s legendary good and detailed introduction to the path integral and most of its important course remains fresh and bracing, because he chose his topics with a sure application in physics. I especially recommend it for graduate students in feel for the essential, and treated them with elegant economy.” theoretical physics and for researchers who want to be introduced to the Frank Wilczek powerful path integral methods.” Nobel Laureate in Physics 2004 Mathematical Reviews 1196pp Dec 2018
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Axion Bose-Einstein Condensation
    Nilanjan Banik1 and Pierre Sikivie1 1University of Florida Abstract QCD axions are a well-motivated candidate for cold dark matter. Cold axions are produced in the early universe by vacuum realignment, axion string decay and axion domain wall decay. We show that cold axions thermalize via their gravitational self-interactions, and form a Bose-Einstein condensate. As a result, axion dark matter behaves differently from the other proposed forms of dark matter. The differences are observable. arXiv:1501.05913v2 [astro-ph.CO] 23 Jun 2017 1 I. QCD AXIONS The theory of strong interactions, called ”quantum chromodynamics” or QCD for short, has in its Lagrangian density a ”θ-term” [1–4] g2 = θ s G˜aµν Ga (1.1) Lθ 32π2 µν where θ is an angle between 0 and 2π, gs is the coupling constant for strong interactions, and a Gµν is the gluon field tensor. The θ-term is a 4-divergence and therefore has no effects in perturbation theory. However, it can be shown to have non-perturbative effects, and these are important at low energies/long distances. Since is P and CP odd, QCD violates Lθ those discrete symmetries when θ = 0. The strong interactions are observed to be P and CP 6 symmetric, and therefore θ must be small. The experimental upper bound on the electric dipole moment of the neutron implies θ . 0.7 10−11 [5, 6]. In the Standard Model of × particle physics there is no reason for θ to be small; it is expected to be of order one. That θ is less than 10−11 is a puzzle, referred to as the strong CP problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosketches of the Recipients of ICTP's 2016 Dirac Medal Award
    Biosketches of the recipients of ICTP's 2016 Dirac Medal Award Nathan Seiberg Nathan Seiberg is a theoretical physicist who has made significant contributions to what has been described as a revolution in fundamental physics. Seiberg’s discoveries have had a decisive influence on the burgeoning field of string theory and other quantum field theories, and are central to the advancement of fundamental theoretical physics today. With various collaborators he has found exact solutions of supersymmetric quantum field theories and string theories. Leading to many new and unexpected insights, these solutions have applications to mathematics and to the dynamics of quantum field theories and string theory. Seiberg has been a professor at the Institute for Advanced Study since 1997, after serving previously at the Institute from 1982-85, 1987-89, and 1994-95. From 1985 to 1986, he was a Senior Scientist with the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel, where he served as professor from 1986 to 1991. He taught at Rutgers University from 1989 to 1997. Seiberg received a B.Sc. (1977) from Tel Aviv University and a Ph.D. (1982) from the Weizmann Institute of Science. Mikhail Shifman Mikhail Shifman was born on April 4, 1949, in Riga, Latvia. He received his education in Moscow Institute for Physics and Technology (1966-1972). In 1972 he was admitted to a graduate program at the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), Moscow. He received his PhD (1976) from ITEP on the topic of the penguin mechanism of weak flavor-changing decays. He stayed with ITEP until his departure for the US in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Modularity and Vacua in N = 1* Supersymmetric Gauge Theory Antoine Bourget
    Modularity and vacua in N = 1* supersymmetric gauge theory Antoine Bourget To cite this version: Antoine Bourget. Modularity and vacua in N = 1* supersymmetric gauge theory. Physics [physics]. Université Paris sciences et lettres, 2016. English. NNT : 2016PSLEE011. tel-01427599 HAL Id: tel-01427599 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01427599 Submitted on 5 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE DE DOCTORAT DE L’ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE Spécialité : Physique École doctorale : Physique en Île-de-France réalisée au Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de l’ENS présentée par Antoine BOURGET pour obtenir le grade de : DOCTEUR DE L’ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE Sujet de la thèse : Vides et Modularité dans les théories de jauge supersymétriques = 1∗ N soutenue le 01/07/2016 devant le jury composé de : M. Ofer Aharony Rapporteur M. Costas Bachas Examinateur M. Amihay Hanany Rapporteur Mme Michela Petrini Examinateur M. Henning Samtleben Examinateur M. S. Prem Kumar Examinateur M. Jan Troost Directeur de thèse Résumé Nous explorons la structure des vides dans une déformation massive de la théorie de Yang-Mills maximalement supersymétrique en quatre dimensions. Sur un espace-temps topologiquement trivial, la théorie des orbites nilpotentes dans les algèbres de Lie rend possible le calcul exact de l’indice de Witten.
    [Show full text]
  • Imprints of the Early Universe on Axion Dark Matter Substructure
    FERMILAB-PUB-19-560-A-T Imprints of the Early Universe on Axion Dark Matter Substructure Nikita Blinov,1, 2 Matthew J. Dolan,3 and Patrick Draper4 1Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510, USA 2Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 3ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale, School of Physics, University of Melbourne, 3010, Australia 4Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA (Dated: November 28, 2019) Despite considerable experimental progress large parts of the axion-like particle (ALP) parame- ter space remain difficult to probe in terrestrial experiments. In some cases, however, small-scale structure of the ALP dark matter (DM) distribution is strongly enhanced, offering opportunities for astrophysical tests. Such an enhancement can be produced by a period of pre-nucleosynthesis early matter domination (EMD). This cosmology arises in many ultraviolet completions and generates 16 −13 the correct relic abundance for weak coupling fa 10 GeV, ALP masses in the range 10 eV ∼ < ma < 1 eV, and without fine-tuning of the initial misalignment angle. This range includes the QCD axion around 10−9 10−8 eV. EMD enhances the growth of ALP small-scale structure, leading to the formation of dense− ALP miniclusters. We study the interplay between the initial ALP oscilla- tion, reheating temperature, and effective pressure to provide analytic estimates of the minicluster abundance and properties. ALP miniclusters in the EMD cosmology are denser and more abundant than in ΛCDM. While enhanced substructure generically reduces the prospects of direct detection experiments, we show that pulsar timing and lensing observations can discover these minihalos over a large range of ALP masses and reheating temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Solitons M
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51638-9 - Supersymmetric Solitons M. Shifman and A. Yung Frontmatter More information SUPERSYMMETRIC SOLITONS In the last decade methods and techniques based on supersymmetry have provided deep insights in quantum chromodynamics and other non-supersymmetric gauge theories at strong coupling. This book summarizes major advances in critical soli- tons in supersymmetric theories, and their implications for understanding basic dynamical regularities of non-supersymmetric theories. After an extended introduction on the theory of critical solitons, including a historical introduction, the authors focus on three topics: non-Abelian strings and confined monopoles; reducing the level of supersymmetry; and domain walls as D brane prototypes. They also provide a thorough review of issues at the cutting edge, such as non-Abelian flux tubes. The book presents an extensive summary of the current literature so that researchers in this field can understand the background and related issues. Mikhail Shifman is the Ida Cohen Fine Professor of Physics at the University of Minnesota, and is one of the world leading experts on quantum chromodynamics and non-perturbative supersymmetry. In 1999 he received the Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics, and in 2006 he was awarded the Julius Edgar Lilienfeld Prize for outstanding contributions to physics. He is the author of several books, over 300 scientific publications, and a number of popular articles and articles on the history of high-energy physics. AlexeiYung is a Senior Researcher in the Theoretical Department at the Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia, and a Visiting Professor at the William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Wess Award 2014 Goes to Arkady Vainshtein
    Press Release No. 158 | or | November 27, 2014 Julius Wess Award 2014 Goes to Arkady Vainshtein KCETA Honors One of the Most Renowned Theoretical Particle Physicists – Award Ceremony on December 5 Monika Landgraf Chief Press Officer Kaiserstraße 12 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany Phone: +49 721 608-47414 Fax: +49 721 608-43658 E-mail: [email protected] Professor Arkady Vainshtein. (Photo: Marianna Kapitskaya-Dokshitzer) The KIT Elementary Particle and Astroparticle Physics Center (KCETA) of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) grants the Julius Wess Award 2014 to the Russian-US American scientist Arkady Vainshtein. Professor Vainshtein is considered one of the most renowned theoretical particle physicists of the second half of the 20th century. Representatives of the media are cor- dially invited to come to the award ceremony on Friday, De- cember 05, 2014, 15 hrs, at the assembly hall of the Center for Advanced Technological and Environmental Training (FTU) on KIT Campus North. With a talk entitled “The Beauty and the Beast: Quantum Field The- ory and the Real World“, award winner Vainshtein, who holds a Glo- ria-Lubkin professorship at the University of Minnesota/USA, will report about his scientific work related to quantum field theory. The KIT Vice President for Research and Information, Professor Detlef Löhe, will hand over the award. “Arkady Vainshtein did outstanding contributions to quantum chromodynamics,” KIT Vice President Löhe says, “which describes the interaction of the fundamental building blocks of atomic nuclei and is a major part of the standard Page 1 / 4 KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu Press Release No.
    [Show full text]
  • 08.128.624 Supersymmetry Lecture Plan
    08.128.624 Supersymmetry Instructor: Felix Yu ([email protected]) • Lectures: Fr 10:00 am-12:00 pm (c.t.) in Minkowski Raum (05-119), Staudinger Weg 7 • Textbook references: { Mikhail Shifman, Advanced Topics in Quantum Field Theory (Main reference) { John Terning, Modern Supersymmetry (Main reference) { Ian Aitchison Supersymmetry in Particle Physics { Howard Baer and Xerxes Tata, Weak Scale Supersymmetry: From Superfields to Scattering Events { Michael Dine, Supersymmetry and String Theory: Dynamics and Duality { Steven Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume III { Julius Wess and Jonathan Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity • ArXiv references: { Stephen Martin, A Supersymmetry Primer, hep-ph/9709356 Lecture plan Fri. October 18, Lecture 1 Introduction and motivation; the Coleman-Mandula theo- rem and its loophole; review of Poincar´ealgebra and extension to SUSY algebra; superspace; Fri. October 25, Lecture 2 Immediate consequences of unbroken SUSY; superfields; SUSY transformations of scalars and fermions; Chiral and vector superfields and auxilliary components; superpotential interactions; K¨ahler potential; the Wess-Zumino SUSY model Fri. November 1 Holiday Fri. November 8, Lecture 3 Superpotential and Lagrangian descriptions of interactions; super-QED; Fayet-Iliopoulis D-term; Super-Higgs mechanism Fri. November 15, Lecture 4 Flat directions and vacuum manifold; R-symmetries; Holo- morphy and non-renormalization of the superpotential; Holomorphic gauge coupling Fri. November 22, Lecture 5 Spontaneous breaking of SUSY; O'Raifeartaigh model/F- term breaking; Fayet-Iliopoulos model/D-term breaking; Goldstinos 1 Fri. November 29, Lecture 6 The MSSM and soft SUSY breaking via gauge mediation, anomaly mediation, supergravity mediation; MSSM fields and interactions Fri. December 6, Lecture 7 MSSM phenomenology: Hierarchy problem; Higgs physics; flavor physics; WIMP and super-WIMP dark matter Fri.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strong CP Problem and Non-Supersymmetric Grand Unification
    The Strong CP Problem and Non-Supersymmetric Grand Unification Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN von der KIT-Fakultat¨ fur¨ Physik des Karlsruher Instituts fur¨ Technologie (KIT) genehmigte DISSERTATION von Jakob Hermann Schwichtenberg aus Mannheim Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 26. Juli 2019 Referent: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Nierste Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Thomas Schwetz-Mangold KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu "The universe is full of magical things patiently waiting for our wits to grow sharper." - Eden Phillpotts Contents List of Figures vi List of Tables vii 1. Introduction1 1.1. Postdictions . .3 1.2. Predictions . .6 1.3. Intrinsic vs. External Solutions . .8 2. Gauge Coupling Unification without Supersymmetry 11 2.1. The Standard Model RGEs and Hypercharge Normalization . 14 2.2. Thresholds Corrections . 17 2.2.1. SU(5)................................... 20 2.2.2. SO(10) . 22 2.2.3. E6 ..................................... 23 2.3. Additional Light Particles . 25 2.3.1. Additional Light Scalars . 27 2.3.2. Additional Light Gauge Bosons . 31 2.3.3. Additional Light Fermions . 36 3. The Strong CP Problem 39 3.1. Helpful Analogies . 40 3.1.1. Particle on a Ring . 40 3.1.2. Pendulum . 45 3.2. The QCD Vacuum . 48 3.3. Axial Rotations . 52 3.3.1. Vector and Axial Symmetry . 52 3.3.2. Axial Anomaly . 53 4. A Unified Solution to the Strong CP Problem 55 4.1. The Nelson-Barr Mechanism . 58 4.2. E6 Unification with Spontaneous CP Breaking . 60 4.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Instantons Versus Supersymmetry: Fifteen Years Later Mikhail Shifman and Arkady Vainshtein
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server TPI-MINN-99/08-T UMN-TH-1743/99 hep-th/9902018 Instantons Versus Supersymmetry: Fifteen Years Later Mikhail Shifman and Arkady Vainshtein Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Abstract An introduction to the instanton formalism in supersymmetric gauge theories is given. We explain how the instanton calculations, in conjunction with analyticity in chiral parameters and other general properties following from supersymmetry, allow one to establish exact results in the weak and strong coupling regimes. Some key applications are reviewed, the main emphasis is put on the mechanisms of the dynamical breaking of supersymmetry. Contents 1 Introduction and Outlook 2 1.1 Dynamical SUSY breaking: what does that mean? ........... 2 1.2Hierarchyproblem............................ 3 1.3Instantons................................. 4 1.4 The Higgs mechanism en route ...................... 6 1.5Chiralversusnonchiralmodels...................... 7 1.6Whatwillnotbediscussed........................ 8 1.7Instantonsvs.supersymmetry:literaturetravelguide......... 9 2 Supersymmetric Theories: Examples and Generalities 11 2.1Superspaceandsuperfields........................ 11 2.2ThegeneralizedWess-Zuminomodels.................. 13 2.2.1 Theminimalmodel........................ 13 2.2.2 Thegeneralcase......................... 14 2.3Simplestgaugetheories.......................... 15 2.3.1 Supersymmetricquantumelectrodynamics..........
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenology and Astrophysics of Gravitationally-Bound Condensates of Axion-Like Particles
    Phenomenology and Astrophysics of Gravitationally-Bound Condensates of Axion-Like Particles Joshua Armstrong Eby B.S. Physics, Indiana University South Bend (2011) A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics of the College of Arts and Sciences Committee Chair: L.C.R. Wijewardhana, Ph.D Date: 4/24/2017 ii iii Abstract Light, spin-0 particles are ubiquitous in theories of physics beyond the Standard Model, and many of these make good candidates for the identity of dark matter. One very well-motivated candidate of this type is the axion. Due to their small mass and adherence to Bose statis- tics, axions can coalesce into heavy, gravitationally-bound condensates known as boson stars, also known as axion stars (in particular). In this work, we outline our recent progress in attempts to determine the properties of axion stars. We begin with a brief overview of the Standard Model, axions, and bosonic condensates in general. Then, in the context of axion stars, we will present our recent work, which includes: numerical estimates of the macroscopic properties (mass, radius, and particle number) of gravitationally stable axion stars; a cal- culation of their decay lifetime through number-changing interactions; an analysis of the gravitational collapse process for very heavy states; and an investigation of the implications of axion stars as dark matter. The basic conclusions of our work are that weakly-bound axion stars are only stable up to some calculable maximum mass, whereas states with larger masses collapse to a small radius, but do not form black holes.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounters with the Axion
    Encounters with the Axion Pierre Sikivie (U of Florida) University of Miami e-Colloquium October 7, 2020 Supported by US Department of Energy grant DE-SC 00101296 Helen Quinn Roberto Peccei Chiral symmetry breaking in the two flavor quark model (u,d) 4 Nambu-Goldstone bosons S. Weinberg The Problem In Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) has a Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly, and is therefore explicitly broken. Quantum tunneling events, called instantons, produce axial charge for each flavor ‘t Hooft, 1976 θθ = − ..... arg (mutmmd ... ) The Strong CP Problem θθ = − arg (mut mmd ... ) = θ − arg det (YYud ) is expected to be of order one The absence of P and CP violation in the strong interactions requires from upper limit −10 θ ≤ 10 on the neutron electric dipole moment A level pooltable on an inclined floor g UPQ (1) • is a symmetry of the classical action • is spontaneously broken • has a color anomaly Peccei and Quinn, 1977 If a U PQ (1) symmetry is assumed, relaxes to zero, and a light neutral pseudoscalar particle is predicted: the axion. Weinberg, Wilczek 1978 Steven Weinberg Frank Wilczek A self adjusting pooltable g 1 ton Searching for the pooltable oscillation quantum g 1 ton f f a γ γ a gγ = 0.97 in KSVZ model 0.36 in DFSZ model Axions are constrained by • beam dump experiments • rare particle decays • radiative corrections • the evolution of stars J.E. Kim M. Shifman A. Vainshtein V.I. Zakharov M. Dine W. Fischler M. Srednicki A. Zhitnitsky Axion constraints 105 1010 1015 fa (GeV) −5 −10 ma(eV) 1 10 10 laboratory searches stellar evolution A self adjusting pooltable g 1 ton Effective potential V(T, Φ ) V Re Φ Im Φ Tf > a fTa > > 1 GeV 1GeV > T axion strings axion domain walls Axion production by vacuum realignment V V a a T ≥ 1 GeV T ≤ 1 GeV initial misalignment angle J.
    [Show full text]