DOCSLIB.ORG

5. Affected Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5. Affected Environment 1 5. Affected Environment 2 5.1 Introduction 3 This chapter is a description of the biological, physical, and socioeconomic 4 characteristics, including human uses that could be affected by implementing the action 5 alternatives for this RMP/EIS (see Chapter 3). Where possible, the information and 6 direction for Reclamation resources has been further broken down into fine-scale 7 assessments and information. Specific aspects of each resource discussed in this section 8 were raised during the public and agency scoping process. The level of information 9 presented in this chapter is commensurate with and sufficient to assess potential effects 10 of the action alternatives in Chapter 6. 11 5.2 Resources 12 This section contains a description of the biological and physical resources of the New 13 Melones Lake Area and generally follows the order of topics addressed in Chapter 3, as 14 follows: 15 • Air quality; 30 • Fire management; 16 • Noise; 31 • Cultural resources; 17 • Climate; 32 • Indian Trust Assets; 18 • Geology; 33 • Socioeconomic and 19 • Topography; 34 environmental justice; 20 • Hydrology/water quality; 35 • General recreation; 21 • Visual Resources; 36 • Facilities, land use, and 22 • Vegetation; 37 management areas; 23 • Fish and wildlife; 38 • Aquatic recreation; 24 • Special status species; 39 • Land-based recreation; 25 • General land management; 40 • Interpretive services and 26 • Access and transportation; 41 visitor information; and 27 • Public health and safety; 42 • Utilities. 28 • Invasive species control; 29 October 2009 New Melones Lake Area Draft RMP/EIS Reclamation 5-1 1 5.2.1 Air Quality 2 The New Melones Lake Area’s location in Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties places it in 3 the Mountain Counties Air Basin in the central Sierra Nevada foothills. Air quality 4 problems in this air basin include periodic high levels of ozone and suspended particulate 5 matter. Other air pollutants generally do not occur in concentrations high enough to 6 constitute a problem. 7 Air quality management programs in California are the responsibility of local air 8 pollution control districts (APCDs), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the 9 US EPA. The local air pollution control districts for the New Melones Lake Area are the 10 Calaveras County APCD and the Tuolumne County APCD. 11 Federal and state air quality management programs have evolved using a combination of 12 two different approaches: 13 • The state implementation plan (SIP) process of setting ambient air quality 14 standards for acceptable exposure to air pollutants, conducting monitoring 15 programs to identify locations experiencing air quality problems, and then 16 developing programs and regulations designed to reduce or eliminate those 17 problems; and 18 • The hazardous air pollutant process of identifying specific chemical substances 19 that are potentially hazardous to human health and then setting emission standards 20 to regulate the amount of those substances that can be released by individual 21 commercial or industrial facilities or by specific types of equipment. 22 Both the EPA and CARB have adopted ambient air quality standards for various 23 pollutants. Federal ambient air quality standards have been adopted for ozone, suspended 24 particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead. State 25 ambient air quality standards have been adopted for these same pollutants, plus sulfates, 26 hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility-reducing particles. Federal and state 27 ambient air quality standards for suspended particulate matter have been established for 28 two different size ranges of suspended particles: inhalable particles (designated as 29 particulate matter less than 10 microns in equivalent aerodynamic diameter [PM10]), and 30 fine particles (designated as particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in equivalent 31 aerodynamic diameter [PM2.5]). 32 Ambient air quality in Tuolumne County is monitored in Sonora, specifically ozone, 33 PM10, PM2.5, and carbon monoxide; ambient air quality in Calaveras County is monitored 34 in San Andreas, specifically ozone and carbon monoxide. There is no PM10 or PM2.5 35 monitoring in Calaveras County. 36 High ozone levels in Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties are due almost entirely to 37 pollutant transport from the Central Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area (CARB 38 2001a). Air quality management programs for Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties rely October 2009 New Melones Lake Area Draft RMP/EIS Reclamation 5-2 1 primarily on emission control programs in upwind source areas to provide for eventual 2 attainment of state and federal ozone air quality standards. 3 Ozone monitoring data from Sonora and San Andreas show that the state and federal 4 ozone standards typically are exceeded several times each year, with considerable year- 5 to-year variation (CARB 2007a). Ozone monitoring data from Sonora and San Andreas 6 show no clear trend in either the frequency of violations or the maximum measured 7 ozone levels. PM10 monitoring data from San Andreas in Calaveras County do not show 8 any clear trends in annual average PM10 levels (CARB 2007a). 9 Most hazardous air pollutant regulations relate to specific industrial sources and 10 operations, but California has identified naturally occurring asbestos as a toxic air 11 contaminant. Naturally occurring asbestos is found in serpentine rock and in some types 12 of ultramafic rocks (those most often found in fault zones). CARB has adopted 13 regulations for limiting the amount of naturally occurring asbestos in aggregate material 14 used for surfaces, including those for roads, road shoulders, parking areas, trails, and 15 playgrounds (CARB 2000). CARB also has adopted separate regulations for 16 construction, grading, quarrying, and surface mining that disturb areas of serpentine, 17 ultramafic rocks, or other areas found to have naturally occurring asbestos (CARB 18 2001b). The local APCDs enforce these regulations. 19 Air pollutant emission sources associated with New Melones Lake Area include car and 20 truck traffic, boat and personal watercraft engine emissions, and generators, camp stoves, 21 and campfires at campground facilities. Localized air quality can be lowered at boat 22 ramps where cars, boats, and personal watercraft may idle while launching. Seaplanes 23 and wildfires and prescribed burns on lands surrounding the New Melones Lake Area are 24 additional but infrequent sources of air pollutant emissions. Facility construction is 25 another, temporary and localized, source of fugitive dust and vehicle emissions. 26 5.2.2 Noise 27 In general, background noise levels vary with wind conditions and relative location (on 28 the lake, along the shoreline, or inland). Typical background noise levels are expected to 29 vary from 35 A-weighted decibels (dBA) to 50 dBA, depending on wind conditions. 30 Aircraft overflights represent an intermittent contributor to overall background noise 31 levels. Noise levels are often somewhat higher near such sources as highway traffic, 32 occupied campgrounds, and areas of the lake with boat and personal watercraft use. 33 Intermittent but intense noise sources may occur as a result of floatplane landings and 34 takeoffs, model aircraft flying, amplified music on wakeboard boats and houseboats, and 35 construction or maintenance at various facilities (Reclamation 2006a) or detonations of 36 explosives at the nearby Carson Hill Mine and at the Blue Mountain Minerals Mine in 37 River Canyon. Hunting represents a seasonal, localized, and intermittent source of noise 38 in areas away from campgrounds and other heavily used visitor facilities. Unauthorized 39 off-road vehicle use represents another intermittent noise source affecting some portions 40 of the New Melones Lake Area. October 2009 New Melones Lake Area Draft RMP/EIS Reclamation 5-3 1 The highest overall noise levels are expected to be in the vicinity of campgrounds, the 2 marina, boat launching facilities, and occupied day use areas. In general, noise conditions 3 in the New Melones Lake Area would not interfere with recreational activities and 4 experiences. However, in a 1993 survey during the Independence Day holiday, some 5 visitors complained about excessive nighttime noise in campgrounds and high noise 6 levels from boats. Boats and personal watercraft with underwater engine exhaust and at 7 full throttle generally produce noise levels of 75 to 85 dBA at a distance of 50 feet (15 8 meters) (Lanpheer 2000). 9 5.2.3 Climate 10 The foothills in which New Melones Lake is located are part of the Sierra bioregion, 11 which includes the entire Sierra Nevada, extending approximately 380 miles (610 12 kilometers) along California’s eastern side. Climate at the lake is Mediterranean, 13 meaning that it has wet winters and dry summers. The location of the lake between the 14 higher elevations of the Sierra and the low-lying floor of the Central Valley means that 15 temperatures are moderate and between those found at these two extremes. Because of 16 this transitional location, climatic features, such as temperature and precipitation, 17 fluctuate widely throughout the year. This fluctuation in turn leads to profound yet 18 predictable seasonal variations in the conditions of various resources, including water 19 temperatures and levels, vegetative vigor, and wildlife residency. 20 Localized fluctuations in temperature and precipitation within the project area result from 21 aspect and elevation. These fluctuations are apparent as differences in vegetation 22 patterns, soil formation and stability, and moisture retention. Although these localized 23 variations in resource conditions may affect planning on a project level, climatic resource 24 conditions for the RMP/EIS are reported on a regional level. 25 Climate data shown in Table 5-1 reflect average high and low temperatures and average 26 precipitation from 1992 to 2006. During this time, the maximum recorded temperature at 27 New Melones Dam was 110 degrees Fahrenheit (43 degrees Celsius), while the lowest 28 temperature was 24 degrees F (- 5 degrees Celsius). Extended periods of temperatures at 29 or below freezing are uncommon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHO OWNS GROUNDWATER? California’S Drought Underscores the Need to Improve How the State — and the Rest of Us — Divvy up a Resource in Demand
    MENU WHO OWNS GROUNDWATER? California’s drought underscores the need to improve how the state — and the rest of us — divvy up a resource in demand. Photo © iStockphoto.com/Pgiam WRITER Erica Gies @egies Independent reporter August 28, 2014 — Grapevines march across wires strung along rolling hills, their little trunks improbably supporting heavy black fruit. Cindy Steinbeck’s family has been farming this land since 1920. They grow Zinfandel, Viognier, Cabernet, Merlot, and Petite Syrah grapes but are best known in this area of Central California for a blend called The Crash, named after a remarkable incident in 1956, when a B-26 crash- landed 200 yards from the family home. Four of the five Air Force men aboard survived, bailing out in the nearby fields. Now a new crash threatens, as groundwater levels beneath the vineyards plummet. California produces nearly half of U.S.-grown fruits, nuts and vegetables, according to the state’s Department of Food and Agriculture. It is in the midst of one of the worst droughts ever recorded, with more than 80 percent of the state in extreme or exceptional drought. But so far, the Steinbeck Vineyards’ 520 acres of grapes are growing well under the hot August sun, thanks to the family’s access to all the groundwater they need: up to 2 acre-feet per acre per season. (An acre-foot is the amount of water required to flood an acre of land one foot deep — about 326,000 gallons.) The Steinbecks’ sole source of irrigation is groundwater. However, groundwater and surface water — rivers, lakes, streams — are part of the same hydrological system.
    [Show full text]
  • Eldorado National Forest Placerville Ranger District Biological Assessment / Evaluation for Botanical Species
    ELDORADO NATIONAL FOREST PLACERVILLE RANGER DISTRICT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT / EVALUATION FOR BOTANICAL SPECIES: PILLIKEN FOREST HEALTH PROJECT 2016 Prepared By: /s/ Matt Brown Date: 4/13/2016 . Matt Brown Botanist Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 II. CONSULTATION TO DATE ....................................................................................... 6 III. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ............................................................... 6 IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 7 V. EXISTING SPECIES AND HABITAT CONDITION ................................................. 7 VI. EFFECTS .................................................................................................................... 16 VII. OTHER MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ..................... 16 VIII. MITIGATIONS AND MONITORING ................................................................... 19 IX. DETERMINATION ................................................................................................... 19 X. REFERENCES............................................................................................................. 20 APPENDIX A: BOTANY REPORT FOR SPECIAL INTEREST PLANTS .................. 21 APPENDIX B: NOXIOUS WEED RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................. 27 APPENDIX C: NOXIOUS/INVASIVE WEEDS OF CONCERN .................................
    [Show full text]
  • HCP EAIS Appendix B
    Calaveras River HCP EA/IS: Appendix B Stockton East Water District Calaveras River Habitat Conservation Plan EA/IS Appendix B Cultural and Paleontological Resources Study Calaveras River HCP EA/IS: Appendix B TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 National Historic Preservation Act .......................................................................................... 2 National Register of Historic Places ........................................................................................ 3 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)....................................................................... 5 California Register of Historical Resources ............................................................................. 6 Public Resources Code §5097.5 ............................................................................................... 7 Human Remains ....................................................................................................................... 7 Paleontological Resources ....................................................................................................... 8 CULTURAL SETTING ..................................................................................................................... 8 Prehistory ................................................................................................................................. 8 Ethnography ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation Sensitive Plants and Fungi Tahoe National Forest American River Ranger District Big Hope Fire Salvage and Restoration Project
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION SENSITIVE PLANTS AND FUNGI TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST AMERICAN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT BIG HOPE FIRE SALVAGE AND RESTORATION PROJECT Prepared by: KATHY VAN ZUUK Plant Ecologist/Botanist TNF Nonnative Invasive Plant Coordinator February 27, 2014 A Portion of the American Wildfire Area along Foresthill Divide Road 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page Executive Summary 4 Introduction 6 Consultation to Date 6 Current Management Direction 8 Alternative Descriptions 9 Existing Environment 11 Description of Affected Sensitive Species Habitat Effects Analysis and 20 Determinations Reasonably Foreseeable Actions/Time Frames for the Analysis/ List of 20 Assumptions Effects to Species without potential habitat in the Project Area 22 • Lemmon’s milk-vetch, Astragalus lemmonii 22 • Modoc Plateau milk-vetch, Astragalus pulsiferae var. coronensis 22 • Sierra Valley Ivesia, Ivesia aperta var. aperta 22 • Dog Valley Ivesia, Ivesia aperta var. canina 23 • Plumas Ivesia, Ivesia sericoleuca 23 • Webber’s Ivesia, Ivesia webberi 23 • Wet-cliff Lewisia, Lewisia cantelovii 24 • Long-petaled Lewisia, Lewisia longipetala 24 • Follett’s mint, Monardella follettii 24 • Layne’s butterweed, Packera layneae 24 • White bark pine, Pinus albicaulis 25 • Sticky Pyrrocoma, Pyrrocoma lucida 25 Effects to Species with potential habitat in the Project Area 26 • Webber’s Milkvetch, Astragalus webberi 26 • Carson Range rock cress, Boechera rigidissima var. demota 27 • Triangle-lobe moonwort, Botrychium ascendens 27 • Scalloped moonwort, Botrychium crenulatum 27 • Common moonwort, Botrychium lunaria 27 • Mingan moonwort, Botrychium minganense 27 • Mountain moonwort, Botrychium montanum 28 • Bolander’s candle moss, Bruchia bolanderi 29 • Clustered Lady’s Slipper Orchid, Cypripedium fasciculatum 29 • Mountain Lady’s Slipper Orchid, Cypripedium montanum 30 • Starved Daisy, Erigeron miser 31 • Donner Pass Buckwheat, Eriogonum umbellatum var.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Conservation Lecture Series
    Welcome to the Conservation Lecture Series https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Lectures Questions? Contact [email protected] Predicting current and future distributions of rare plants: Lessons From the Intersections of Science, Policy, and Management Melanie Gogol-Prokurat Patrick McIntyre [email protected] [email protected] Biogeographic Data Branch Rare plants in California • Biodiversity hotspot • > 6,500 plants (~30% found only in CA) • >1,600 considered rare (CNPS Inventory) Today: Distribution modeling & rare plants I. Present (basic modeling) II. Future (specific examples) Introduction to methods Scenarios of climate change Issues to watch for Rare plant biology Species distribution modeling + statistical global model change Species locations Predictor variables Estimated Future (or past) (and absences) distribution distribution -Temperature -Museum specimens -Precipitation -Focused surveys -Elevation -Citizen science Species distribution modeling Complex methods with simple output: Thousands of scientific papers in last 15 years Areas of application • Global health • Agriculture • Biological Conservation and Management -Predict current habitat -Assess climate change Vector born diseases ZikaCDC virus James . & vector 2016 CDC James . 2050 Source: Carlson et al. 2016 BioRxiv Climatic suitability for wine production in 2050 Up to 70% losses in key regions $300 billion industry Gained Retained Lost Source: Hannah et al. PNAS 2013 Projecting into the past to understand extinction
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Appendix A: the San Joaquin Valley’S Water Balance 3 Brad Arnold and Alvar Escriva-Bou
    Water Stress and a Changing San Joaquin Valley Technical Appendices CONTENTS Technical Appendix A: The San Joaquin Valley’s Water Balance 3 Brad Arnold and Alvar Escriva-Bou Technical Appendix B: The San Joaquin Valley’s Economic Trends, Agricultural and Rural Community Characteristics, and Institutions 26 Jelena Jezdimirovic, Ellen Hanak, Brian Gray, Sarge Green, Josué Medellín-Azuara Technical Appendix C: Native Species in the San Joaquin Valley: Drivers of Water and Land-use Regulation 41 Nathaniel Seavy and Peter Moyle Supported with funding from the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation, the TomKat Foundation, and the US Environmental Protection Agency This publication was developed with partial support from Assistance Agreement No.83586701 awarded by the US Environmental Protection Agency to the Public Policy Institute of California. It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. Water Stress and a Changing San Joaquin Valley Technical Appendix A: The San Joaquin Valley’s Water Balance CONTENTS Figure A1 5 FIgure A2 7 FIgure A3 7 FIgure A4 8 FIgure A5 9 FIgure A6 10 FIgure A7 11 FIgure A8 12 FIgure A9 12 FIgure A10 13 FIgure A11 13 FIgure A12 15 FIgure A13 16 FIgure A14 16 FIgure A15 18 Figure A16 19 Table A1 20 FIgure A17 21 FIgure A18 22 FIgure A19 22 FIgure A20 23 FIgure A21 24 Brad Arnold and Alvar Escriva-Bou Supported with funding from the S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Recovery Plan Revision for Gabbro Soil Plants of the Central Sierra
    Recovery Plan Revision for Gabbro Soil Plants of the Central Sierra Nevada Foothills: El Dorado bedstraw (Galium californicum ssp. sierrae) and Pine Hill flannelbush (Fremontodendron californicum ssp. decumbens) Original Approved: August 2002 Original Prepared by: Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office DRAFT AMENDMENT 1 We have identified best available information that indicates the need to amend recovery criteria for this species since the Recovery Plan for Gabbro Soil Plants of the Central Sierra Nevada Foothills (recovery plan) was completed. In this recovery plan modification, we synthesize the adequacy of the existing recovery criteria, show amended recovery criteria, and describe the rationale supporting the proposed recovery plan modification. The proposed criteria amendments are shown as an appendix that supplements the recovery plan, pages III-2 through III-37 of the recovery plan that applies to El Dorado bedstraw and Pine Hill flannelbush. For U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Sacramento, California December 2018 Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Region 8, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1 METHODOLOGY USED TO COMPLETE THE RECOVERY PLAN AMENDMENT This draft amendment was prepared by the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office (SFWO) of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and will be peer reviewed in accordance with the OMB Peer Review Bulletin following the publication of the Notice of Availability. We used information from our files, survey information and monitoring reports spanning various localities of the species, and communication with species experts. Communication with species experts was our primary source to update the species status and threats, and was instrumental in developing amended recovery criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Physical Resources
    2. Physical Resources 2.1 Overview 2.1.1 Introduction Physical resources including climate, topography, air resources, noise, geologic resources (excluding caves), caves, and hydrologic resources form the basis for the combination of resources found in New Melones Lake Area. This section describes these resources and gives an overview of the issues associated with them that Reclamation may address in the RMP/EIS, as well as strategies that Reclamation currently uses to manage those resources. This section is organized into the following subsections: • Climate: Climatic variables include precipitation and temperature. Precipitation influences management actions by affecting lake levels, and in turn, access to certain resources. Temperature is one of the main influences on season of use. • Topography: Topography includes all features that contribute to diverse surface assemblage. Topographic features including steepness and aspect affect access to resources and influence such factors as location of vegetative communities and fire management. • Air Resources: The air resources section focuses primarily on factors that influence air quality. Although management of the New Melones Lake Area has little effect on air quality in the overall region, localized effects may occur at particular times of the year, or in particular locations at the lake. • Noise: Noise includes all sources of sound generated at or near the lake area which affect humans or visitors. Noise may be from natural sources, such as wind, or it may be generated by human sources, such as boats or cars. • Geologic Resources (excluding caves): Geologic resources include subsurface features, soils, and rock formations. The geologic resources section describes these features and relates them to current management.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Bay-Delta Funding Summary
    FEDERAL BAY-DELTA FUNDING SUMMARY California Bay-Delta Related Funding (in millions of dollars) CALFED Interim Federal Action Plan (Bay-Delta) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Enacted Enacted Pres Budget Total, All Agencies 430.383 Total, All Agencies 370.87 295.47 Water Management 64.064 Storage 5.437 Renewed Federal Partnership 3.07 2.97 Conveyance 5.534 Water Use Efficiency 40.670 Smarter Water Supply and Use 88.25 80.49 Water Transfers 0.000 Environmental Water Account 0.000 Habitat Restoration 239.36 173.59 Drinking Water Quality 50.591 Levee System Integrity 4.440 Drought Floodplain and Management 40.19 38.42 Ecosystem Restoration 233.805 Science 22.382 Oversight & Coordination 3.460 Other 0.000 Bureau of Reclamation 185.533 Bureau of Reclamation 172.66 110.81 Water Management Storage 5.437 Renewed Federal Partnership 2.00 1.90 Conveyance 5.534 Water Use Efficiency 18.370 Smarter Water Supply and Use 15.19 10.06 Water Transfers 0.000 Environmental Water Account 0.000 Habitat Restoration 155.47 98.85 Drinking Water Quality 13.360 Levee System Integrity Drought Floodplain and Management 0.00 0.00 Ecosystem Restoration 124.541 Science 16.295 Oversight & Coordination 1.996 Other Corps of Engineers 98.135 Corps of Engineers 44.53 53.80 Water Management 64.064 Storage 0.000 Renewed Federal Partnership 0.10 0.10 Conveyance Water Use Efficiency Smarter Water Supply and Use 0.00 0.00 Water Transfers Environmental Water Account Habitat Restoration 4.38 15.42 Drinking Water Quality Levee System Integrity 4.440 Drought Floodplain and Management 40.05
    [Show full text]
  • Calaveras River 2016 Watershed Sanitary Survey
    Calaveras River 2016 Watershed Sanitary Survey Prepared for Calaveras County Water District Stockton East Water District Karen E. Johnson Water Resources Planning October 12, 2016 CALAVERAS RIVER 2016 WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY PREPARED FOR STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT & CALAVERAS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT October 2016 Prepared by: Karen E. Johnson Water Resources Planning TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Section 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Regulatory Requirement for a Watershed Sanitary Survey ............................................................... 1-1 Stanislaus/Calaveras River Group ................................................................................................................ 1-1 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Report Organization ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 Section 2 Watershed Characteristics and Infrastructure ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Docoileus Hemionus) Range
    Appendix D BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Study Area Figure 1 PROJECT VICINITY 0 105 Moore Biological Blue Mountain Minerals Miles . Consultants Tuolumne County, CA Legend Base map: Columbia, CA, USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle Existing Permit Area Sections: 2 & 3 Township: 02N Revised Fill Area Range: 14E Figure 2 PROJECT LOCATION 0 1,000 2,000 Moore Biological Blue Mountain Minerals Feet . Consultants Tuolumne County, CA agricultural fill area will reach an elevation of 2,135 feet. Maximum slopes of the revised fill area will not exceed natural slopes on adjacent hillsides, and will be less steep than the currently approved fill design. A 3:1 slope ratio will be followed around the perimeter and the final upper surface of the revised fill area will be nearly flat. The Agricultural Fill Area will be revegetated in blue oak- digger pine woodland (BOP), valley oak woodland (VOW), and annual grassland (AGS) habitats. Regulatory Requirements: Clean Water Act: The Clean Water Act (CWA) 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376) provides guidance for the restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Section 404 of the CWA established a permit program administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) regulating the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States (including wetlands). Implementing regulations by ACOE are found at 33 CFR Parts 320-330. Guidelines for implementation are referred to as the Section 404 (b)(1) Guidelines and were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in conjunction with ACOE (40 CFR Parts 230).
    [Show full text]