DOCSLIB.ORG

Calaveras River 2016 Watershed Sanitary Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calaveras River 2016 Watershed Sanitary Survey Calaveras River 2016 Watershed Sanitary Survey Prepared for Calaveras County Water District Stockton East Water District Karen E. Johnson Water Resources Planning October 12, 2016 CALAVERAS RIVER 2016 WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY PREPARED FOR STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT & CALAVERAS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT October 2016 Prepared by: Karen E. Johnson Water Resources Planning TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Section 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Regulatory Requirement for a Watershed Sanitary Survey ............................................................... 1-1 Stanislaus/Calaveras River Group ................................................................................................................ 1-1 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Report Organization ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 Section 2 Watershed Characteristics and Infrastructure ........................................................................... 2-1 Watershed Study Area and Water Supply System ................................................................................. 2-1 Calaveras River Watershed Sanitary Survey Study Area Description ........................................... 2-4 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................ 2-4 Topography ............................................................................................................................................ 2-4 Geology ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-4 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................................... 2-5 Land Use .................................................................................................................................................. 2-5 Urban/Residential/Commercial .................................................................................................... 2-5 Calaveras River Water Supply Systems ...................................................................................................... 2-5 White Pines Lake .................................................................................................................................. 2-6 Sheep Ranch Water Treatment Plant .......................................................................................... 2-6 New Hogan Dam ................................................................................................................................... 2-6 New Hogan Reservoir ........................................................................................................................ 2-6 Jenny Lind Water Treatment Plant ............................................................................................... 2-7 Dr. Joe Waidhofer Water Treatment Plant ................................................................................ 2-8 Section 3 Potential Contaminant Sources ........................................................................................................... 3-1 Watershed Counties and Subwatersheds .................................................................................................. 3-1 Water Quality Parameters of Concern ........................................................................................................ 3-3 Microorganisms .................................................................................................................................... 3-3 Disinfection By-Product Precursors ............................................................................................ 3-3 Turbidity .................................................................................................................................................. 3-3 SOCs, VOCs, Herbicides, Pesticides, and Metals ....................................................................... 3-4 Forestry Activities ............................................................................................................................................... 3-4 Concern .................................................................................................................................................... 3-5 Potential Contaminant Sources ...................................................................................................... 3-5 Watershed Management ................................................................................................................... 3-5 Irrigated Agriculture and Pesticides ............................................................................................................ 3-6 Concern .................................................................................................................................................... 3-6 Potential Contaminant Sources ...................................................................................................... 3-7 Irrigated Agriculture ........................................................................................................... 3-7 Pesticides and Herbicides ................................................................................................. 3-8 Watershed Management ................................................................................................................... 3-8 Livestock................................................................................................................................................................ 3-10 Concern .................................................................................................................................................. 3-10 Potential Contaminant Sources .................................................................................................... 3-11 Watershed Management ................................................................................................................. 3-11 Mining ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3-12 Concern .................................................................................................................................................. 3-12 Potential Contaminant Sources .................................................................................................... 3-12 Watershed Management ................................................................................................................. 3-13 Active and Inactive Mines ............................................................................................... 3-13 Methyl Mercury ................................................................................................................... 3-14 CALAVERAS RIVER 2016 WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS Recreation ............................................................................................................................................................. 3-14 Concern .................................................................................................................................................. 3-14 Potential Contaminant Sources .................................................................................................... 3-14 Calaveras Big Trees State Park ..................................................................................... 3-15 White Pines Lake ................................................................................................................ 3-15 New Hogan Reservoir ....................................................................................................... 3-15 Less Formal Recreation Areas ...................................................................................... 3-16 Unauthorized Uses ............................................................................................................. 3-16 Watershed Management ................................................................................................................. 3-16 Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal ........................................................................................................ 3-17 Concern .................................................................................................................................................. 3-17 Potential Contaminant Sources .................................................................................................... 3-17 Landfills .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHO OWNS GROUNDWATER? California’S Drought Underscores the Need to Improve How the State — and the Rest of Us — Divvy up a Resource in Demand
    MENU WHO OWNS GROUNDWATER? California’s drought underscores the need to improve how the state — and the rest of us — divvy up a resource in demand. Photo © iStockphoto.com/Pgiam WRITER Erica Gies @egies Independent reporter August 28, 2014 — Grapevines march across wires strung along rolling hills, their little trunks improbably supporting heavy black fruit. Cindy Steinbeck’s family has been farming this land since 1920. They grow Zinfandel, Viognier, Cabernet, Merlot, and Petite Syrah grapes but are best known in this area of Central California for a blend called The Crash, named after a remarkable incident in 1956, when a B-26 crash- landed 200 yards from the family home. Four of the five Air Force men aboard survived, bailing out in the nearby fields. Now a new crash threatens, as groundwater levels beneath the vineyards plummet. California produces nearly half of U.S.-grown fruits, nuts and vegetables, according to the state’s Department of Food and Agriculture. It is in the midst of one of the worst droughts ever recorded, with more than 80 percent of the state in extreme or exceptional drought. But so far, the Steinbeck Vineyards’ 520 acres of grapes are growing well under the hot August sun, thanks to the family’s access to all the groundwater they need: up to 2 acre-feet per acre per season. (An acre-foot is the amount of water required to flood an acre of land one foot deep — about 326,000 gallons.) The Steinbecks’ sole source of irrigation is groundwater. However, groundwater and surface water — rivers, lakes, streams — are part of the same hydrological system.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento River Flood Control System
    A p pp pr ro x im a te ly 5 0 M il Sacramento River le es Shasta Dam and Lake ek s rre N Operating Agency: USBR C o rt rr reek th Dam Elevation: 1,077.5 ft llde Cre 70 I E eer GrossMoulton Pool Area: 29,500 Weir ac AB D Gross Pool Capacity: 4,552,000 ac-ft Flood Control System Medford !( OREGON IDAHOIDAHO l l a a n n a a C C !( Redding kk ee PLUMAS CO a e a s rr s u C u s l l Reno s o !( ome o 99 h C AB Th C NEVADA - - ^_ a a Sacramento m TEHAMA CO aa hh ee !( TT San Francisco !( Fresno Las Vegas !( kk ee e e !( rr Bakersfield 5 CC %&'( PACIFIC oo 5 ! Los Angeles cc !( S ii OCEAN a hh c CC r a S to m San Diego on gg !( ny ii en C BB re kk ee ee k t ee Black Butte o rr C Reservoir R i dd 70 v uu Paradise AB Oroville Dam - Lake Oroville Hamilton e M Operating Agency: CA Dept of Water Resources r Dam Elevation: 922 ft City Chico Gross Pool Area: 15,800 ac Gross Pool Capacity: 3,538,000 ac-ft M & T Overflow Area Black Butte Dam and Lake Operating Agency: USACE Dam Elevation: 515 ft Tisdale Weir Gross Pool Area: 4,378 ac 3 B's GrossMoulton Pool Capacity: 136,193Weir ac-ft Overflow Area BUTTE CO New Bullards Bar Dam and Lake Operating Agency: Yuba County Water Agency Dam Elevation: 1965 ft Gross Pool Area: 4,790 ac Goose Lake Gross Pool Capacity: 966,000 ac-ft Overflow Area Lake AB149 kk ee rree Oroville Tisdale Weir C GLENN CO ee tttt uu BB 5 ! Oroville New Bullards Bar Reservoir AB49 ll Moulton Weir aa nn Constructed: 1932 Butte aa CC Length: 500 feet Thermalito Design capacity of weir: 40,000 cfs Design capacity of river d/s of weir: 110,000 cfs Afterbay Moulton Weir e ke rro he 5 C ! Basin e kk Cre 5 ! tt 5 ! u Butte Basin and Butte Sink oncu H Flow from the 3 overflow areas upstream Colusa Weir of the project levees, from Moulton Weir, Constructed: 1933 and from Colusa Weir flows into the Length: 1,650 feet Butte Basin and Sink.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of California Sportfishing Protection Alliance on Habitat Conservation Plan for the Calaveras River
    California Sportfishing Protection Alliance “An Advocate for Fisheries, Habitat and Water Quality” Chris Shutes, Water Rights Advocate 1608 Francisco St., Berkeley, CA 94703 Tel: (510) 421-2405 E-mail: [email protected] http://calsport.org/news/ November 14, 2019 Ms. Angela Somma Ms. Monica Gutierrez NMFS California Central Valley Office Attn: Calaveras River Habitat Conservation Plan, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 5-100, Sacramento, CA 95814. [email protected] Via e-mail Re: Comments of California Sportfishing Protection Alliance on Habitat Conservation Plan for the Calaveras River Dear Ms. Somma and Ms. Gutierrez: The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA) respectfully submits these comments on the Habitat Conservation Plan for the Calaveras River (HCP). Notice of the HCP was published in the Federal Register on September 30, 2019 (RIN 0648–XR041). The HCP seeks protection under the federal Endangered Species Act for incidental take of threatened Central Valley steelhead and species of concern fall-run Chinook salmon that regularly inhabit the Calaveras River in Calaveras and San Joaquin counties, California. The HCP also seeks ESA protection for incidental take of endangered Central Valley winter-run Chinooks salmon, threatened Central Valley spring-run Chinooks salmon, and species of concern late-fall-run Chinook salmon, none of which frequently inhabit the Calaveras River but which may at times stray into the river. The HCP proposes a series of conservation strategies and avoidance measures to protect salmon and O. Mykiss in the Calaveras River, Mormon Slough, the Stockton Diverting Channel, Old Calaveras River, and specified other interconnected and adjoining waters. The HCP proposes to issue Stockton East Water District (SEWD or District) a 50-year Incidental Take Permit which would protect the District from claims under the ESA in connection with the District’s Calaveras River operations.
    [Show full text]
  • (Entosphenus Tridentatus), California – San Joaquin Regional Management Unit
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Arcata Fisheries Technical Report TR 2018-35 Regional Implementation Plan for Measures to Conserve Pacific Lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus), California – San Joaquin Regional Management Unit Damon H. Goodman and Stewart B. Reid U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office 1655 Heindon Road Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-7201 May 2018 Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Pacific Southwest Region Fish and Aquatic Conservation Program, with additional support provided by the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. This plan was developed as part of the Pacific Lamprey Conservation Initiative using information collected through: (1) regional stakeholder meetings hosted throughout the San Joaquin Regional Management Unit in 2015-2017, (2) subsequent discussions with various stakeholders, and (3) the authors' experience. New information, as it becomes available, will be incorporated into subsequent revisions of this plan and posted on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office website. Disclaimers: The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. The Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Fisheries Program reports its study findings through two publication series. The Arcata Fisheries Data Series was established to provide timely dissemination of data to local managers and for inclusion in agency databases. The Arcata Fisheries Technical Reports publishes scientific findings from single and multi-year studies that have undergone more extensive peer review and statistical testing. Additionally, some study results are published in a variety of professional fisheries and aquatic science journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter L. Huber Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf7s2006bz Online items available Walter L. Huber papers Processed by Lois Judd and Claire Bullitt (May 1962); machine-readable finding aid created by Xiuzhi Zhou Special Collections & University Archives The UCR Library P.O. Box 5900 University of California Riverside, California 92517-5900 Phone: 951-827-3233 Fax: 951-827-4673 Email: [email protected] URL: http://library.ucr.edu/libraries/special-collections-university-archives © 1999 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Walter L. Huber papers HUBER 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Walter L. Huber papers Date (bulk): 1910-1950 Collection Number: HUBER Extent: 13 linear feet(30 boxes) Repository: Rivera Library. Special Collections Department. Riverside, CA 92517-5900 Languages: English. Access Collection is open for research. Biographical Information Walter Leroy Huber, the son of Millard Fillmore and Celia (Dill) Huber, was born in San Francisco, California, on January 4, 1883. He attended the public schools of Yolo County, California, and after graduating from Woodland High School, entered the University of California (Berkeley), from which he was graduated with the degree of Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, in 1905. Mr. Huber obtained his early professional experience in structural design as an Assistant Engineer with John D. Galloway. In 1908, he was appointed Chief Engineer of the University of California's building program by Supervising Architect John Galen Howard. Because of his knowledge of hydroelectric design and his familiarity with the mountains (he led parties which were some of the first to climb the Sierra peaks), in 1910 he represented Galloway and Markwart in surveying for a possible hydroelectric project on the Calaveras River.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft
    Chapter 11 Geology and Soils This chapter describes the affected environment for geology and soils, as well as potential environmental consequences and associated mitigation measures, as they pertain to implementing the alternatives. This chapter presents information on the primary study area (area of project features, the Temperance Flat Reservoir Area, and Millerton Lake below RM 274). It also discusses the extended study area (San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River, the San Joaquin River from the Merced River to the Delta, the Delta, and the CVP and SWP water service areas). Affected Environment This section describes the affected environment related to geology, geologic hazards, erosion and sedimentation, geomorphology, mineral resources, soils, and salts. Where appropriate, geology and soils characteristics are described in a regional context, including geologic provinces, physiographic regions, or other large-scale areas, with some area-specific geologic maps and descriptions of specific soil associations. Geology This section describes the geology of the primary and extended study areas. Primary Study Area A description of the surficial geologic units encountered in the primary study area is presented in Table 11-1. Geologic maps of the primary study area and the area of project features are presented in Figure 11-1 and Figure 11-2, respectively. Draft – August 2014 – 11-1 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Environmental Impact Statement Table 11-1. Description of Surficial Geologic Units of the Primary Study Area Geologic Map of Millerton Lake Quadrangle, West-Central Sierra Nevada, California1 Formation Surficial Deposits General Features Abbreviation Plutonic rocks characterized by undeformed blocky hornblende prisms as long as 1 cm and by biotite books as Tonalite of Blue Canyon much as 5 mm across.
    [Show full text]
  • HCP EAIS Appendix B
    Calaveras River HCP EA/IS: Appendix B Stockton East Water District Calaveras River Habitat Conservation Plan EA/IS Appendix B Cultural and Paleontological Resources Study Calaveras River HCP EA/IS: Appendix B TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 National Historic Preservation Act .......................................................................................... 2 National Register of Historic Places ........................................................................................ 3 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)....................................................................... 5 California Register of Historical Resources ............................................................................. 6 Public Resources Code §5097.5 ............................................................................................... 7 Human Remains ....................................................................................................................... 7 Paleontological Resources ....................................................................................................... 8 CULTURAL SETTING ..................................................................................................................... 8 Prehistory ................................................................................................................................. 8 Ethnography ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Calaveras River HCP Appendix B
    Calaveras River HCP: Appendix B Stockton East Water District Calaveras River Habitat Conservation Plan Appendix B Calaveras River Environment B-1 Calaveras River HCP: Appendix B Calaveras River Environment The following sections describe the general environmental setting of the Calaveras River Basin, including a basin overview, climate, topography/geology, hydrology/streams/ drainage, New Hogan Reservoir storage and operation, water temperature, nutrients, dissolved oxygen, sediment, and existing land use. 1.0 Basin Overview The Calaveras River Basin extends for roughly 60 miles in a southwesterly direction from the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the Stockton metropolitan area (Figure B-1). The entire basin encompasses an area of approximately 590 square miles. The mountainous portion upstream from New Hogan Reservoir comprises roughly 360 square miles. The lower basin consists of approximately 230 square miles, including 100 square miles of foothill drainage between New Hogan Dam (RM 42) and Bellota (RM 24), and 120 square miles of valley floor downstream of Bellota (USAED 1981). Elevations in the Calaveras River Basin range from near sea level at the confluence with the San Joaquin River to 130 feet at Bellota, 500 feet at New Hogan Dam, and approximately 6,000 feet at the headwaters. Only about 5% of the basin is found above 4,000 feet in elevation (Tetra Tech 2001; USACE 2001). The Calaveras River mainstem begins at the junction of the North Fork Calaveras River and the South Fork Calaveras River, a short distance upstream of the upper extent of New Hogan Reservoir, and is the basin’s primary drainage channel from the headwaters to Bellota (RM 24), where the river splits into the Old Calaveras River channel and Mormon Slough/Stockton Diverting Canal (SDC).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Appendix A: the San Joaquin Valley’S Water Balance 3 Brad Arnold and Alvar Escriva-Bou
    Water Stress and a Changing San Joaquin Valley Technical Appendices CONTENTS Technical Appendix A: The San Joaquin Valley’s Water Balance 3 Brad Arnold and Alvar Escriva-Bou Technical Appendix B: The San Joaquin Valley’s Economic Trends, Agricultural and Rural Community Characteristics, and Institutions 26 Jelena Jezdimirovic, Ellen Hanak, Brian Gray, Sarge Green, Josué Medellín-Azuara Technical Appendix C: Native Species in the San Joaquin Valley: Drivers of Water and Land-use Regulation 41 Nathaniel Seavy and Peter Moyle Supported with funding from the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation, the TomKat Foundation, and the US Environmental Protection Agency This publication was developed with partial support from Assistance Agreement No.83586701 awarded by the US Environmental Protection Agency to the Public Policy Institute of California. It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. Water Stress and a Changing San Joaquin Valley Technical Appendix A: The San Joaquin Valley’s Water Balance CONTENTS Figure A1 5 FIgure A2 7 FIgure A3 7 FIgure A4 8 FIgure A5 9 FIgure A6 10 FIgure A7 11 FIgure A8 12 FIgure A9 12 FIgure A10 13 FIgure A11 13 FIgure A12 15 FIgure A13 16 FIgure A14 16 FIgure A15 18 Figure A16 19 Table A1 20 FIgure A17 21 FIgure A18 22 FIgure A19 22 FIgure A20 23 FIgure A21 24 Brad Arnold and Alvar Escriva-Bou Supported with funding from the S.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality
    2015 UPPER MOKELUMNE RIVER WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY FINAL DRAFT JULY 2016 PREPARED BY: PETERSON BRUSTAD INC. 1180 IRON POINT ROAD, SUITE 260 FOLSOM, CA 95630 916‐608‐2212 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 3 Report Organization ......................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Progress Since 2010 ................................................................................. 4 Watershed Description ................................................................................................ 8 Upper Mokelumne River Watershed ............................................................................... 8 Land Use ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Protection Information for San Joaquin County
    FLOOD PROTECTION INFORMATION FOR SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY July 2008 Flood Mapping Update The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is undertaking a Flood Insurance Rate Map update for San Joaquin County, and all of its cities, under what is referred to as the Map Modernization Program. The new “Flood Insurance Rate Maps” (FIRMs) that FEMA is creating will provide flood insurance rate zones and replace the existing paper maps for our area. Initial preliminary maps were received on January 15, 2008 and have been undergoing a review and public education process. Several community meetings have been held in the areas most affected by the proposed map changes, most notably Central Stockton/Smith Canal, Woodbridge, and the Twin Creeks Subdivision in Stockton. As a result of ongoing communications with FEMA, the preliminary maps have been modified several times since January. Up-to-date, internet-accessible copies of the preliminary FIRMs are available to property owners (See website resources on back of page). We continue to learn more about the reasons for specific map changes and which neighborhoods will be negatively affected. Your local officials are working to mitigate mapping impacts, improve flood protection, and reduce insurance costs. Final, effective FIRMs are expected to be released by FEMA in April, 2009. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has also developed draft 100- and 200-year floodplain maps for our region. These maps are scheduled for release in the near future and are for planning purposes only. The DWR maps will not replace FEMA maps and will not affect insurance rates. Flood Insurance: Will you be required to buy flood insurance? When the final maps are officially adopted, flood insurance requirements for some areas will change.
    [Show full text]