DOCSLIB.ORG

The Synoptic Gospels and Acts (SS 504) Notre Dame Seminary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Synoptic Gospels and Acts (SS 504) Notre Dame Seminary The Synoptic Gospels and Acts (SS 504) Notre Dame Seminary Dr. Nathan Eubank Spring 2013 Professor of Sacred Scripture 10-11:15 Mon, Wed Notre Dame Seminary Room 2 Email: [email protected] (504) 866-7426 Ext. 3015 Office hours: 1-2:30pm Monday and by appt. Course Description This course introduces the student to the Gospel according to Matthew, Mark, and Luke (the Synoptic Gospels), as well as the book of Acts. There are four main components to the course: (1) we will address introductory issues such as authorship, date, literary genre, and historicity, as well as the Synoptic problem. (2) We will study the unique literary and theological vision of each of the Synoptic Gospels. (3) We will explore key events the life of Jesus as described by the witness of all three Synoptic Gospels in order to learn the habit of reading each of the Gospels both for their own unique voices and in light of the fullness of revelation. (4) The course concludes with a brief study of the book of Acts. Course Rationale CCC 125: “The Gospels are the heart of all the Scriptures ‘because they are our principal source for the life and teaching of the Incarnate Word, our Savior.’” (quoting Dei Verbum 18) Envisioned Outcomes Students will begin to learn to read the Synoptic Gospels and Acts in their historical and canonical contexts. They will be able to explain key events in the life of Jesus (e.g., baptism, Last Supper) in light of the Old Testament and Jesus’ ancient Jewish context. Students will also develop proficiency in the use of modern as well as patristic commentaries on the Gospels as resources for preaching. Required Texts 1. Mary Healy. The Gospel of Mark. Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture. Baker Academic, 2008. ISBN-10: 0801035864 2. Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Gospel of Luke. Sacra Pagina. Liturgical Press, 2006. ISBN- 10: 0814659667 3. Mitch, Curtis and Edward Sri. The Gospel of Matthew. Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture. Baker Academic, 2010. ISBN-10: 080103602X 4. Synopsis of the Four Gospels, Revised Standard Version, American Bible Society, 2010, ISBN: 978-1585169429 5. Ratzinger, Joseph. Jesus of Nazareth: The Infancy Narratives. 2012. ISBN-10: 0385346409. Hardback. Recommended Texts 1. The Catena aurea of Thomas Aquinas (available online: http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php ) 2. Goodacre, Mark. The Synoptic Problem: A Way Through the Maze. (available online: http://www.archive.org/details/synopticproblemw00good ) 3. Ratzinger, Joseph. Jesus of Nazareth: From the Baptism in the Jordan to the Transfiguration. Ignatius Press, 2008. 4. Ratzinger, Joseph. Jesus of Nazareth – Holy Week: From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection. Ignatius Press, 2011. Lecture, Presentation, and Reading Schedule Week 1 (January 13, 15) Introduction to the class, Introduction to the gospels. Burridge, Gospel Genre (handout) Simone Weil, “Reflections on the Right Use of School Studies With a View to the Love of God” (handout) Jan 20-23 (no classes) Week 2 (January 27, 29) How do the Synoptic Gospels relate to one another? (Establishing the literary link) Differences in chronology and in parallel passages Who used whom as a source? (a.k.a the Synoptic Problem) TBA Mark Goodacre, The Synoptic Problem: A Way Through the Maze. (available online: http://www.archive.org/details/synopticproblemw00good ) pages 13- 55. Week 3 (February 3, 5) Continue discussion of Synoptic relationships The distinguishing theological features of the gospels Why do we have four Gospels when there is only one Jesus? Gospel of Peter (handout) Gospel of Thomas (handout) Protoevangelium of James (handout) Recommended: Hays, The Moral Vision of the New Testament, 73-137 (handout) 2 Week 4 (February 10, 12) The birth narratives Matthew 1:1-2:23 Luke 1:5-2:52 Ratzinger, Jesus of Nazareth: The Infancy Narratives Week 5 (February 17, 19) John the Baptist, Jesus’ baptism, temptation, and initial proclamation Note: it is helpful to read using both a bible and a synopsis Matt 3:1-4:25 Mark 1:2-2:20 Luke 3:1-4:15 Healy, The Gospel of Mark, 28-44 Week 6 (February 24, 26) The Sermon on the Mount and its Lukan parallels Matt 5:1-7:28 (follow along in the synopsis) Luke 6:17-49 Thomas à Kempis, Imitation of Christ (excerpt handout) ***Paper #1 due February 28 by 5pm in instructor’s email**** March 3-4: Mardi gras holiday March 5: Ash Wednesday Week 7 (March 10, 11) Healings and exorcisms Rejection by the people Parables Mark 1:21-8:38 Matt 13:53-58 Luke 4:14-30 G. P. Anderson, “Parable” (handout) Week 8 (March 17. No classes on 19th) Turn to the cross Rich young man, Zacchaeus Triumphal Entry Conflict with the leaders Eschatological discourse 3 Matt 16:13-20:34 Mark 8:27-10:52 Luke 9:18-19:27 Eubank, “Purchasing the Rewards of Eternal Life” (handout) Week 9 (March 24, 26) The Last Supper Matt 26:1-35 Mark 14:1-31 Luke 22:1-38 1 Corinthians 11:23-26 Hengel, Crucifixion, (excerpt handout) Week 10 (March 31, April 2) The Passion Matt 26:36-27:66 Mark 14:32-15:47 Luke 22:39-23:56 Joel Marcus, “Crucifixion as Parodic Exaltation” (handout) Week 11 (April 7, 9) The Resurrection The Ascension Matt 28 Mark 16 Luke 24:1-53 Acts 1 Ratzinger, Jesus of Nazareth. Holy Week: From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection, 241-293 April 12-21: Easter holidays (no classes) Week 12 (April 23. No class on the 21st) The birth of the Church Acts 2-15 Harper-Collins introduction to Acts Week 13 (April 28, 30) The Politics of the Church 4 Recommended: Rowe, World Upside Down: Reading Acts in the Graeco- Roman Age ***Paper #2 due April 28 by 5pm in instructor’s email*** May 6-8: final exams Important Dates 1. Weekly readings must be completed by Wednesday at class time. 2. Paper #1 due by 5pm Feb 28. 3. Paper #2 due by 5pm April 28. Evaluation Criteria Reading comprehension/ class participation: 20% Paper #1: 20% Paper #2 30% Final exam: 30% Reading comprehension will be measured by asking seminarians questions about the readings in class. Class participation refers to one’s alertness, teachable spirit, and willingness to engage in conversation or to ask questions when invited to do so by the professor. Use of laptops during class We live in an age of distraction. Many of us find it difficult to stop fiddling with electronic devices or to take a break from checking email. To engage in prayerful study – that is, to do our work with rigor and attentiveness to the voice of the Lord – we must learn to be quiet and focus. Therefore, the use of laptops in class is strongly discouraged. Any person who is seen using a laptop (or other electronic device) for something other than taking notes will receive an automatic 5% reduction in the final grade. Academic Integrity Students are expected to take full responsibility for their academic formation. They are expected to “respect academic scholarship by giving proper credit to other people’s work, while at the same time preparing well for assigned materials and examinations in such a way that their academic integrity will never be questioned.” A student involved in academic dishonesty will receive an “F” for the assignment and will be reported to the seminary administration. Ultimately, a student found guilty of academic dishonesty may be dismissed from the Notre Dame Seminary. Attendance, Late Papers and Assignment Submissions Policy Unexcused absences and tardiness will adversely affect the class participation grade. A late assignment will lose 10 percentage points for every day it is late after the assigned due date. Assignments will not be accepted unless they are delivered by email to the instructor as a ms word file, 12 point Times New Roman font, one inch margins. 5 Make-up Work Students will not be given the opportunity to do additional work or make-up work in order to change their final grade. Make-up work simply changes (and lowers) the standard requirements set forth in the course syllabus and creates a situation that is unfair to all other students who were evaluated according to the syllabus. Extra credit may be offered during the semester; if so, it will be offered to all students equally. Bibliography Cohen, Shaye J. D. From the Maccabees to the Mishnah A great introduction to the Jewish world of the New Testament. Lagrange Powell, Mark Allan. Jesus as a Figure in History An introduction to historical Jesus research. See the following Catholic commentary series: Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (self-consciously obedient to the Magisterium and pastoral) Sacra Pagina There are a number of excellent non-Catholic commentary series, including the following: Anchor Bible Commentary International Critical Commentary Bible dictionaries can be helpful entry points into an issue. The standard is: The Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by David Noel Freedman. See also the IVP Bible Dictionary Series. ATLA is an important resource for finding scholarly journal articles. The following journals are among the most important New Testament journals: Catholic Biblical Quarterly Journal for the Study of the New Testament Journal of Biblical Literature New Testament Studies Novum Testamentum For patristic biblical interpretation see the Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture series, which is available in the library. This series is very helpful, but cannot replace reading the fathers for oneself. 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ice Breaker Discussion Questions
    I Kings 1:1-18 ICE BREAKER If God asks you the one thing you would want from Him in your life what would you ask for? Share why this is so important to you. DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. I Kings 1:6 is an important but small note for the reader: “His father(king David) had never at any time displeased him(Davids’ son, Adonijah) by asking, “Why have you done thus and so?” David’s passivity is a contributing factor in Adonijah’s sin. So, as parents we need to ask: “Am I off doing great things but missing the most important things at home?” The list of things that can grab our attention and pull us to invert our priorities are endless. Here are a few: success at work, ministry, time with social media or any media or just keeping busy. Discuss what helps you keep your priorities in order and what tends to divert you in these three areas: your walk with God, your marriage(if single, focus on how well you are prioritizing your vital relationships within the body of Christ), and your parenting. 2. We tend to think we are pretty wise. We tend to think this at every phase of our lives. Often we come up with our own wisdom. Proverbs 14:2 says, “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.” Here are 5 wisdom imposters: Celebrity imposter--we are a culture of celebrity. If you reach celebrity then you ​ get a platform to say what is “really true”.
    [Show full text]
  • Interesting Facts About Haggai
    InterestingInteresting FactsFacts AboutAbout HaggaiHaggai MEANING: “Festival” or “Festive.” I At the time of the book of Haggai, it had been 16 years AUTHOR: Haggai since the initial work on rebuilding the Temple had TIME WRITTEN: According to Haggai 1:1, September 24 520 begun. B.C. was when “the word of the Lord came by Haggai the I Chronology of the rebuilding of the Temple: prophet to Zerubbabel.” • 536 B.C. - The work began. POSITION IN THE BIBLE: • 37th Book in the Bible • 534 B.C. - After two year (534 B.C.) the work was • 37th Book in the Old Testament discontinued for 14 years. • 15th of 17 books of Prophecy • 520 B.C. - The work was resumed and completed four (Isaiah - Malachi) years later. • 10th of 12 minor prophets (Hosea - Malachi) • 516 B.C. - The work on the Temple was completed. • 29 Books to follow it. NOTE: Six years of actual work was done over a CHAPTERS: 2 twenty-year period. VERSES: 38 I In Haggai 2:23, Zerubbabel becomes the center of the WORDS: 1,131 Messianic line, like a signet ring sealing both branches OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HAGGAI: together. I Haggai is second only to Obadiah in brevity among the books of the Old Testament. David I Haggai’s name is mentioned 9 times in the book. I Haggai is known only from this book as well as two references to him in the Book of Ezra. • Ezra 5:1 Solomon Nathan • Ezra 6:14 I Haggai returned from Babylon with the remnant that returned under the leadership of Zerubbabel.
    [Show full text]
  • David's Heir: the Five Prophecies of the Davidic Covenant; Three Words in the Covenant Establishing Perpetuity of Davidic King
    David’s Heir: The Five Prophecies of the Davidic Covenant; Three Words in the Covenant Establishing Perpetuity of Davidic Kings: “House, Kingdom, Throne,” 2 Sam 7:16; Matthew’s Messianic Genealogy of Jesus: the Chart Pedigree, Matt 1:1; Uses of the Title “Messiah”: the Anointed One, Ps 18:50; 89:20, 28–29, 34–36; 132:11 16. The Lord now reveals to Nathan the eternal significance of this covenant to David: 2 Samuel 7:16 - “Your [ David’s ] house [ the Davidic bloodline ] and your kingdom [ Israel ] shall endure before Me forever [ the kingdom is permanent ]; your throne shall be established forever [ rulership of the Davidic line through Christ is eternal ]. v. 17 - In accordance with all these words and all these visions, so did Nathan communicate the Davidic Covenant to David. 17. There are five prophecies contained in the Davidic Covenant: (1) David will have a son that will succeed him on the throne of Israel and who will establish his kingdom. (2) That son will be Solomon; it is he that will build the temple. (3) The Davidic dynasty on the throne of Israel is established for eternity. (4) Even though Solomon will fail, enter reversionism, and become involved in idolatry, the covenant will not be broken but remain in force. (5) The house of David, his throne, and his kingdom are established forever. 18. The Lord uses three words in the covenant that expresses the immutability of David’s right to the throne of Israel. 19. The word “house” is ty]B^ (bayith) and it refers to the dynasty of a monarch, in this case the house of David.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Genealogies As Given by Matthew and Luke
    Scholars Crossing The Second Person File Theological Studies 10-2017 The Two Genealogies as Given by Matthew and Luke Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/second_person Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "The Two Genealogies as Given by Matthew and Luke" (2017). The Second Person File. 4. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/second_person/4 This The Eternal Son of God, Jesus Christ is brought to you for free and open access by the Theological Studies at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Second Person File by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE #4 THE TWO GENEALOGIES AS GIVEN BY MATTHEW AND LUKE MATTHEW’S GENEALOGY Mt. 1:1-17 Matthew begins with Abraham and goes forward in time to Joseph. A. He gives the royal line of Joseph. B. He traces this line through Solomon, David's first son. C. His list includes forty-one names, four of which are women. This genealogy is remarkable for several reasons: A. It contains the names of four women—Oriental and Mid-eastern genealogies rarely do this. B. All four women had questionable backgrounds. 1. Tamar was an ex-harlot (Mt. 1:3; Gen. 38:13-30). 2. Rahab was an ex-harlot (Mt. 1:5; Josh. 2:1). 3. Ruth was a former pagan (Mt. 1:5; Ruth 1:4).
    [Show full text]
  • Scripture Guide 2 Samuel 12 and Psalm 51
    Scripture Guide 2 Samuel 12 and Psalm 51 Biblical Context Prior to Nathan’s immediate appearance in the David and Bathsheba story in 2 Samuel 12, he is first introduced in the famous Davidic covenant in 2 Samuel 7. In this pericope,1 God reveals to David that someone from his line will sit on the throne forever. However, it’s important to remember that God spoke this promise to David through Nathan. ​ ​ As we later see more clearly in 1 and 2 Kings, the role of the prophet was to serve as a counterbalance to the office of the king. This idea is briefly alluded to in the relationship between Samuel the judge and King Saul and more clearly fleshed out in Nathan the prophet and King David. The general picture was that God most often spoke directly to the prophets, not the kings. Thus prophets were to act as covenant-keeping watch dogs, making sure the kings and the nation spiritually and morally acted in line with God’s will and word.2 As we also see later in 1 and 2 Kings, the role of the prophet was treated with disdain in Israel’s history. Of all of the kings of Israel and Judah - 32 total - only eight did “right in the eyes of the LORD.” The implication being, in the course of 400 years of the Israel-Judea monarchy, only eight were in good standing with God and with their assigned prophet. This explains in large part why prophets were treated with such dishonor. The prophet’s job was to call kings to repentance to keep in step with God’s covenant faithfulness and blessing but the majority of kings would ignore the prophets’ call.3 Many kings constructed temples and altars to other gods, made treaties with pagan nations, and fell into moral corruption, and where the king fails so do the people who follow him.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does the Bible Say About Nathan?
    WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY ABOUT NATHAN? Nathan: A Messenger of God How to Speak God’s Truths (2 Samuel 12, ESV) Build Relationships Now when the king lived in his house and the LORD had given him rest from all his surrounding enemies, the king said to Nathan the prophet, “See now, I dwell in a house of cedar, but the ark of God dwells in a tent.” (2 Samuel 7:1-2) • And the LORD sent Nathan to David. He came to him and said to him... (2 Samuel 12:1) Speak God’s Wisdom Generally And Nathan said to the king, “Go, do all that is in your heart, for the LORD is with you.” (2 Samuel 7:3) Hear God’s Voice Continually And Samuel said, “Speak, for your servant hears.” (1 Samuel 3:10) • But that same night the word of the LORD came to Nathan, “Go and tell my servant David, ‘Thus says the LORD: Would you build me a house to dwell in?...’” (2 Samuel 7:4-5) Share God’s Truths Specifically In accordance with all these words, and in accordance with all this vision, Nathan spoke to David. (2 Samuel 7:17) Confront Satan’s Lies with Truth Nathan said to David, “You are the man! Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, ‘I anointed you king over Israel, and I delivered you out of the hand of Saul. And I gave you your master's house and your master's wives into your arms and gave you the house of Israel and of Judah.
    [Show full text]
  • On Saints, Sinners, and Sex in the Apocalypse of Saint John and the Sefer Zerubbabel
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Theology & Religious Studies College of Arts and Sciences 12-30-2016 On Saints, Sinners, and Sex in the Apocalypse of Saint John and the Sefer Zerubbabel Natalie Latteri Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/thrs Part of the Christianity Commons, History of Religion Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, and the Social History Commons Apocalypse of St. John and the Sefer Zerubbabel On Saints, Sinners, and Sex in the Apocalypse of St. John and the Sefer Zerubbabel Natalie E. Latteri, University of New Mexico, NM, USA Abstract The Apocalypse of St. John and the Sefer Zerubbabel [a.k.a Apocalypse of Zerubbabel] are among the most popular apocalypses of the Common Era. While the Johannine Apocalypse was written by a first-century Jewish-Christian author and would later be refracted through a decidedly Christian lens, and the Sefer Zerubbabel was probably composed by a seventh-century Jewish author for a predominantly Jewish audience, the two share much in the way of plot, narrative motifs, and archetypal characters. An examination of these commonalities and, in particular, how they intersect with gender and sexuality, suggests that these texts also may have functioned similarly as a call to reform within the generations that originally received them and, perhaps, among later medieval generations in which the texts remained important. The Apocalypse of St. John and the Sefer Zerubbabel, or Book of Zerubbabel, are among the most popular apocalypses of the Common Era.1 While the Johannine Apocalypse was written by a first-century Jewish-Christian author and would later be refracted through a decidedly Christian lens, and the Sefer Zerubbabel was probably composed by a seventh-century Jewish author for a predominantly Jewish audience, the two share much in the way of plot, narrative motifs, and archetypal characters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Davidic Covenant
    TMSJ 10/2 (Fall 1999) 233-250 THE DAVIDIC COVENANT Michael A. Grisanti Associate Professor of Old Testament The centrally important Davidic Covenant was one of the “grant” covenants, along with the Abrahamic Covenant, in contrast to the Mosaic Covenant that was a “suzerain-vassal” treaty. Second Samuel 7:8-16 articulates the Davidic Covenant in two parts: promises that find realization during David’s life and promises that find realization after David’s death. Though “grant” covenants such as the Davidic are often considered unconditional, conditionality and unconditionality are not mutually exclusive. God’s covenant with David had both elements. Psalms 72 and 89 are examples of ten psalms that presuppose God’s covenant with David. Various themes that pervade the Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, and New covenants show the continuity that connects the four. * * * * * God’s establishment of His covenant with David represents one of the theological high points of the OT Scriptures. This key event builds on the preceding covenants and looks forward to the ultimate establishment of God’s reign on the earth. The psalmists and prophets provide additional details concerning the ideal Davidite who will lead God’s chosen nation in righteousness. The NT applies various OT texts about this Davidite to Jesus Christ (cf. Matt 1:1-17; Acts 13:33-34; Heb 1:5; 5:5; et al). In the Book of Revelation, John addresses Him as the “King of Kings and Lord of Lords” (Rev 19:16). Walter Kaiser suggests at least four great moments in biblical history that supply both the impetus for progressive revelation and the glue for its organic and continuous nature: (1) the promise given to Abraham in Genesis 12, 15, 17; (2) the promise declared to David in 2 Samuel 7; (3) the promise outlined in the New Covenant of Jeremiah 31, and (4) the day when many of these promises found initial realization in the death and resurrection of Christ.1 Ronald Youngblood’s understand is that 2 Samuel 7 is “the center and 1Walter C.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Study Notes: David and Nathan the Prophet
    – Anita Dole Bible Study Notes Volume 3 – DAVID AND NATHAN THE PROPHET II Sa171,uel 12: 1-25 Introduce the lesson by reminding the classes that Saul's dis­ obedience in the case of the Amalekites led to Samuel's saying that the kingdom "was departed" from him. The immediate anointing of David resulted. Then review David's life while Saul continued on the throne, and finally speak of the difference between the two men and of David's achievements as king, before taking up the incident of our lesson. Doctrinal Points The Lord permits sorrow to come to us only for our good. The written Word ofGod is all parable. Truth is given us in order that we may judge our own states rather than those of0 thers. We never become so good that we are no longer in danger offalling into evil. Notes for Parents The second king of Israel was David. Immediately after the first disobedience of S~ul (I Samuel 13), the Lord sent Samuel to Beth­ lehem to anoint David. At that time David was only a boy keeping his father's sheep, and it was a long .time before he became king in the sight ofthe people. We all know many stories of his early years. After Saul's death only the people of the southern part of the Holy Land at first accepted David as king. He reigned seven years in Hebron before he was recognized by all the people. Then he captured Jerusalem, made it his capital, and brought the ark there.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was the Widows Son?
    Who was the Widows Son? Who was the “Widow’s Son”? The answer might seem easily answered, but when one reads of legends, scripture writings, the Apocrypha and other historical documents it becomes apparent that perhaps we cannot answer this question so easily. In the writings of Masonic scholars we learn of Hiram Abiff, “The Widow’s Son”. There are others referred to as “The Widow’s Son”. It seems this is a title to which more than one can be named. The use of the title is actually traced back to the Grail lore traditions which speak of a descended blood line and specifically reference Ruth. Ruth, a woman of the Moabite tribe, was married to Boaz, and she was a heroine of the Old Testament. She was also the Great Grandmother of King David. That King David, the father of King Solomon, who built the Temple? Ruth became pregnant, and married Boaz. He was quite a bit older being 80, while Ruth was 40. The book says that Boaz dies the next day. That must have been some wedding night. From this point on, all the descendants of Ruth, were known simply as “Sons of the Widow”. A genetic title if you will. A genealogy can be traced. Ruth gives birth to the first “Son of the Widow”, Obed, who grows up and bears his son Jesse, who bears his son David who bears his sons Solomon and Nathan. Using the lineage given in the Gospels of the Christian Bible, Jesus the Nazarene is a descendant of Ruth, making him also, a “Son of the Widow” or “Widow’s Son”.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Meaning in the Parable of the Poor Man's Ewe (2 Sam 12:1–4)
    Journal of Hebrew Scriptures Volume 13, Article 14 DOI:10.5508/jhs.2013.v13.a14 Double Meaning in the Parable of the Poor Man's Ewe (2 Sam 12:1–4) JOSHUA BERMAN Articles in JHS are being indexed in the ATLA Religion Database, RAMBI, and BiBIL. Their abstracts appear in Religious and Theological Abstracts. The journal is archived by Library and Archives Canada and is accessible for consultation and research at the Electronic Collection site maintained by Library and Archives Canada. ISSN 1203–1542 http://www.jhsonline.org and http://purl.org/jhs DOUBLE MEANING IN THE PARABLE OF THE POOR MAN’S EWE (2 SAM 12:1–4) JOSHUA BERMAN BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY In this article I offer a new solution to an age-old interpretive crux: the meaning of the parable of the poor man’s ewe (2 Sam 12:1–4) in light of the surrounding narrative of the David and Bathsheba account of 2 Sam 11–12. Ever since the Middle Ages commenta- tors to this passage have noted the apparent incongruity between the elements of the parable on the one hand and the elements of the surrounding narrative on the other.1 Although some scholars have suggested readings that attempt a close mapping of equiva- lents between parable and narrative, most opinions have resisted such a close mapping and have opted instead for what I will refer to here as the “conventional approach” to the issue.2 In the first part of this study, I review the merits and demerits of that ap- proach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Home in Jerusalem: Partitions, Parks, and Planning Futures
    THE POLITICS OF HOME IN JERUSALEM: PARTITIONS, PARKS, AND PLANNING FUTURES Nathan W. Swanson A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geography. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Banu Gökarıksel Sara Smith John Pickles Sarah Shields Nadia Yaqub © 2016 Nathan W. Swanson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Nathan W. Swanson: The Politics of Home in Jerusalem: Partitions, Parks, and Planning Futures (Under the direction of Banu Gökarıksel) At a time when Palestine and Palestinians are ubiquitously framed through the “Israeli- Palestinian conflict” and the “peace process”, the spaces of everyday life for Palestinians are often ignored. This is in spite of the fact that so many of the Israeli policies and technologies of occupation and settlement are experienced materially by Palestinians in these spaces. In this dissertation, then, drawing on feminist geopolitics, I consider everyday Palestinian spaces like the home, neighborhood, and village—with a focus on Jerusalem—to better understand geographies of occupation and settlement in Palestine/Israel today. I argue, through attention to Palestinian experiences on the ground, that widespread representations of Jerusalem as either a “united” or “divided” city fail to capture the Palestinian experience, which is actually one of fragmentation, both physical and social. As a case study in fragmentation, I turn to the zoning of Israeli national parks in and between Palestinian neighborhoods, arguing that parks have served the purposes of settlement in less politicized ways than West Bank settlement blocs, but like the settlement blocs, have resulted in dispossession and restrictions on Palestinian construction, expansion, and movement.
    [Show full text]