DOCSLIB.ORG

DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Incorporated by Reference in 14 CFR New Restriction Or Requirements on the 71.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Incorporated by Reference in 14 CFR New Restriction Or Requirements on the 71.1 152,52 Federal Register I Vol. 56, No. 52 I Friday, Marcil 19, 1993 I Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION incorporated by reference in 14 CFR new restriction or requirements on the 71.1. public, Furthermore, the FAA finds that Federal Aviation Admlnlatratlon During reviews ofthe airspace this amendment does not involve a descriptions that were promulgated in change in the dimensions or operating 14 eFR Parf71 the Terminal Airspace Reconfiguration requirements ofthe airspace listings final rule, the FAA found some minor incorporated by reference in part 71. (Ood<et No. 26852: Amendment No. 71-161 errors. This amendment will correct These errors are insignificant in nature RIN 2120-AEI8' these errors. and impact and inconsequential to the The Amendment industry and publl~. Therefore, notice Terminal Airspace Reconflgurstlon and public procedure under 5 U.S,C. The FAA, including each regional 533(b) are unnecessary. AGEHCY: Federal Aviation office, and the National Ocean Service Administration (FAAI, oar. (NOS) bave continued to review each of Control Zones for the Primary Airport of ACTION: Final rule; technical more than 3,100 airspace descriptions on ARSA amendment that we'" promulgated in the Terminal The FAA amends the airspace Airspace Reconfiguration final rule. descriptions of the following control SUMMARY: This action amends the During the review, minor errors were zones for the primary airport of an Terminal Airspace Reconfiguration final noted. Many could be found only after ARSA in § 71.171 of FAA Order rule, which was published in the the airspace areas were depicted on 7400.7A. Federal Regilter on Augult27, 1992. aeronautical charts. Some of the errors The technical corrections to these This action amends technical errors in would have inadvertently created airspace descriptions are described certain airspace descriptions contained" airspace that would have become an ' below. in FAA Order 7400.7A, Compilation of incorrect class ofairspace on Septe~ber FAA Region: New England Regulations, and FAA Order 7400.9, 16, 1993. In some of these cases, this Airspace Reclassification. This action amendment designates airspace that . Providence, .Rh.ode.ls1an.d: The also ensures that Class E airspace is • will become Class E airspace in an area alfspac,e descn.l?tion 15 reVIsed by , that otherwise would have become the excludmg the 8.1rspace that extends mto designated above a Class B, Class C, or ! Class D airspace area. The intent ofthis more restrictive Cless D airspace. the North Kingstown, Rhode.Island action is to correct these technical errors In addition, during the review the ~ontrol zone from the extensIOn for prior to the implementation of the FAA noted that § 71.71, wbich describes mstrument approaches to the Airspace Reclassification final rule on Class E airspace and becomes effective Provid~nce. Theodore Fr8;I1cis Green September 16, 1993. September 16, 1993, needs a minor' State AIrport. EFFECTIVE DATE: Amendatory items 1 revision. Class E airspace extends FAA Region: Northwest Mountain upward from the surface to the .' and 2 are effective April 29, 1993, Portlo~d, Oreg~n. alfSpa~ through September 15, 1993. overlying or adjacent controlled The airspace. However, the strict application d~scnphon IS reVlsed ,by excluding the Amendatory items 3 and 4 are effective tha~ September 16, 1993. ofthis definition would leave a corridor 8lfsp8ce extends mto the Portland, of uncontrolled airspace above 8 Class Troutdale AIrport, Oregon control zone. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William M. Mosley, Air Traffic Rules B, Class C, or Class D airspace area FAA Region: Western Pacific Branch, ATP-230, Federal Aviation because the Class E ai,:"P?ce e!'ds . El Toro Marine Carps Air Stotian, Administration, 800 Independence beneath the more restrictiv~ auspace. California: The airspace description is Avanue, SW" Washington, DC 20591, Therefore, the F~ ~as revI.sed . revised by changing the geographic telephone (202) 267-9251. § 71.71(c). The reVISIOn deSIgnates Class position of EI Toro Marine Corps Air E eirspaC? above a Cless B, Class C, or Station from "lat. 33° 40'03"N., long, SUPPlEMENTARY INFORMATION: Class D 8lrspace area for the purpose of 117° 43'09"W." to "Ial. 33040'34"N.. Background transitioning to or from the terminal or long. 117043'52"W." ' en route environment. On August 27, 1992, the Terminel Airport radar service areas (ARSA's), Airport Rodor Service Areas Airspace Reconfiguration final rule was contJ;ol z~es, an~ transition areas are Tbe FAA amends the airspace published in the Federal Register (57 pubhsbed m sections 71.501, 71.171, descriptions ofthe following ARSAs in FR 38962). This rule amended part 71 and 71.181, respectively, of FAA Order Section 71.501 ofFAA Order 7400.7A. ofthe Federel Aviation Regulations (14 7400.7A dated November 2, 1992, and. CFR) by revising all control zones and effective November 27, 1992, wbich is FAA RegIOn: Northwest Mount81n transition areas 8S well 8S specific incorporated by reference in 14 CFR Whidbey Islond Novol Air Stotion, terminal control areas (TeAs) and 71.1. Tbe ARSA's, control zones, and Woshington:The airspace description is airport radar service areas (ARSAsI transition areas listed in this document revised by adding language that notes described in FAA Order 7400.7, will be publisbed subsequently in the the ARSA operates on a part-time basis. Compilation of Regulations, effective Order, The ARSA now operates on a part-time November 1, 1991. This final rule also The FAA has determined that this basis in accordance with airspace modified the corresponding Class B, action: (1) Is not a "major rule" under docket number 92-AWA-Q4, Class C, Class D, 8)ld Class E airspace Executive Order 12291; (2) is nota FAA R..W. P'fi descriptions in FAA Order 7400.9, "significant rule'· under OOT Policies egIon. estern aCl c Airspace Reclassification, effective and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, September 16,1993, Since the issuance 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Colifornio: The airspace description is of this final rule, the FAA has issued preparetion of a regulatory evaluation revised by changing the geograpbic FAA Handbook 7400.7A, Compilation because the anticipated impact is so position of EI Toro Marine Corps Air ofRegulations, effective November 27, minimal. Station from "lat. 33°40'03"N., long, 1992. through September 15, 1993 (57 This action amplifies and clarifies the 117°43'09"W," to "Iat. 33°40'34''N., FR 56246; November 27, 1992), which is existing rule and does not place any long. 117'43'52''W.'' Federal Register I Vol. 56, No. 52 I Friday, March 19, 1993 I Rules and Regulations 15253 Control Zones for Airports W;rh ceiling from "up to and Including 2,600 including 2,600 feet MSL" to "up to, but Operating Control Towers That Are Not feet mean aea level (MSL)" to "up to, not including, 1,600 feet MSL:' which the Primary Airport W;rhin a TCA or an but not including, 2,500 feet MSL," ensurea the ceiling does not penetrate ARSA which ensures the ceiling does Dot the Orlando, Florida TCA. penetrate the Washington Tri-Area TCA. Winston-Salem. North Carolina: Tha The FAA amends the airspace ­ airspace description Is revised by descriptions ofthe following control The description is also revised by excluding the airspace that extenda into raiaing the ceiling from "2,700 feet zones for airports with operating control MSL" to "3,500 feet MSL." The higher towers thet are not the primary airport the Washington Tri-Area TCA from the control zone. ceiling is the equivalent of2,500 feet of a TCA oren ARSA In § 71.171 ofFM ahove the .urface, which is the atandard Order 7400.7A. FM Region: Great Lakes The technical corrections to these ceiling for control zane. that will airspace descriptions are described Glenview Naval Air Station. Illinois: become Class D airspace. The airspace description is revised by below. FM Region: Southwest adding the arrival extensions for runway FAA Region:·Alasl:.an 17, which were inadvertently deleted. Enid, Vance AirForce Base, Oklahoma: The airspace description is Fairbanks, Fort Wainwright AnnyAir FM Region: New England Field. Alaska: The airspace description revised by raising the ceiling from is revised by excluding certain airspace Beverly, Massach usetts: The airspace "2,800 feet MSL" to "3,800 feet MSL," northwest ofthe aUport from the area description Is revised by excluding The higher ceiling is the equivalent of necessary for aircraft operating under airspece that extends into the Boaton, 2,500 feet above the surface, which is Instrument flight rules (IFR) to depart Massachusetts TCA and the Lawrence, the standard ceiling for control zones within controlled airspace. Massachusetts control zone from the that will become Class D airspace. area necessary for aircraft operating Enid. Woodring Municipal Airport, FM Region: central under IFR to depart within controlled Oklahoma: The airspace d»scriptian is Sioux City, Iowa: The airspace airspace, which will become Class D revised by raising the ceiling from description is revised by excluding the airspace on September 16. 1993. The "2,800 feet MSL" to "3,800 feet MSL." airspace within 8 I-mile radius of the airspace description is also .revised by The higher ceiling is the equivalent of South Sioux City, Martin Field, excluding airspace that extends into the 2,500 feet above the surface, which is Nebrasl:.e, from the control zone. This Lawrence, Massachusetts control zone the standard ceiling for control zones change will not require pilots who from the extension used for instrument that will become Class D airspace. operate aircraft in the vicinity ofMartin approaches. which beeom~s Class E Lawton. Oklahoma: Tha airspace Field to establisb two-way radio airspace on September 16, 1993.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Climate Monitoring Report for Denali National Park and Preserve, Wrangell-St-Elias National Park and Preserve and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve
    Annual Climate Monitoring Report for Denali National Park and Preserve, Wrangell-St-Elias National Park and Preserve and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve Pamela J. Sousanes Denali National Park and Preserve P.O. Box 9 Denali Park, AK 99755 2005 Central Alaska Network NPS Report Series Number: NPS/AKCAKN/NRTR-2006/0xx Project Number: CAKN-xxxxxx Funding Source: Central Alaska Network Denali National Park and Preserve Draft 2005 Annual Climate Monitoring Report – March 2006 Central Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network File Name: Sousanes_P_2006_ClimateMonitoringCAKN_0315.doc Recommended Citation: Sousanes, Pamela J. 2006. Annual Climate Monitoring Report for Denali National Park and Preserve, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, and Yukon- Charley Rivers National Preserve. NPS/AKCAKN/NRTR-2006/xx. National Park Service. Denali Park, AK. 75 pg. Acronyms: I&M Inventory and Monitoring CAKN Central Alaska Network DENA Denali National Park and Preserve WRST Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve YUCH Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve NPS National Park Service WRCC Western Regional Climate Center NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWS National Weather Service RAWS Remote Automated Weather Station NCDC National Climatic Data Center AWOS Automated Weather Observation Station SNOTEL Snow Telemetry ii Draft 2005 Annual Climate Monitoring Report – March 2006 Central Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Talkeetna Airport, Phase II
    Talkeetna Airport, Phase II Hydrologic/ Hydraulic Assessment Incomplete Draft January 2003 Prepared For: Prepared By: URS Corporation 301 W. Northern Lights 3504 Industrial Ave., Suite 125 Blvd., Suite 601 Fairbanks, AK 99701 CH2M Hill Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 374-0303 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 2.0 Background Data .................................................................................................................4 2.1 Airport Construction ................................................................................................4 2.2 Past Floodplain Delineations ...................................................................................6 2.3 Past Suggestions for Floodplain Mitigation.............................................................7 2.4 Historical Floods......................................................................................................8 3.0 Flood-Peak Frequency .......................................................................................................12 3.1 Talkeetna River at its Mouth..................................................................................12 3.2 Susitna River Above and Below the Talkeetna River ...........................................13 3.3 Summary................................................................................................................15 4.0 Flood Timing ....................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Estimating Visits to Denali National Park and Preserve Spring/Summer 2011 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/AKR/NRTR—2012/641 ON THE COVER Denali National Park and Preserve visitors enjoy the view from the Eielson Visitor Center at mile 66 on the Denali Park Road. NPS Photo Estimating Visits to Denali National Park and Preserve Spring/Summer 2011 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/AKR/NRTR—2012/641 Peter J Fix Department of Humans and the Environment School of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK 99775-7200 Andrew Ackerman Social Scientist Center for Resources, Science, and Learning Denali National Park and Preserve Ginny Fay Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage November, 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 5/20/2015
    Page 1 of 7 Average wind speeds are based on the hourly data from 1996-2006 from automated stations at reporting airports (ASOS) unless otherwise noted. Click on a State: Arizona , California , Colorado , Hawaii , Idaho , Montana , Nevada , New Mexico , Oregon , Utah , Washington , Wyoming ALASKA AVERAGE WIND SPEED - MPH STATION | ID | Years | Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec | Ann AMBLER AIRPORT AWOS |PAFM|1996-2006| 6.7 8.5 7.9 7.7 6.7 5.3 4.8 5.1 6.1 6.8 6.6 6.4 | 6.5 ANAKTUVUK PASS AWOS |PAKP|1996-2006| 8.9 9.0 9.1 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.1 8.5 7.6 8.2 9.3 9.1 | 8.6 ANCHORAGE INTL AP ASOS |PANC|1996-2006| 6.7 6.0 7.5 7.7 8.7 8.2 7.8 6.8 7.1 6.6 6.1 6.1 | 7.1 ANCHORAGE-ELMENDORF AFB |PAED|1996-2006| 7.3 6.9 8.1 7.6 7.8 7.2 6.8 6.4 6.5 6.7 6.5 7.2 | 7.1 ANCHORAGE-LAKE HOOD SEA |PALH|1996-2006| 4.9 4.2 5.8 5.7 6.6 6.3 5.8 4.8 5.3 5.2 4.7 4.4 | 5.3 ANCHORAGE-MERRILL FLD |PAMR|1996-2006| 3.2 3.1 4.4 4.7 5.5 5.2 4.8 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.1 2.9 | 4.0 ANIAK AIRPORT AWOS |PANI|1996-2006| 4.9 6.6 6.5 6.4 5.6 4.5 4.2 4.0 4.6 5.5 5.5 4.1 | 5.1 ANNETTE AIRPORT ASOS |PANT|1996-2006| 9.2 8.2 8.9 7.8 7.4 7.0 6.2 6.4 7.2 8.3 8.6 9.8 | 8.0 ANVIK AIRPORT AWOS |PANV|1996-2006| 7.6 7.3 6.9 5.9 5.0 3.9 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.9 6.3 | 5.5 ARCTIC VILLAGE AP AWOS |PARC|1996-2006| 2.8 2.8 4.2 4.9 5.8 7.0 6.9 6.7 5.2 4.0 2.7 3.3 | 4.6 ATKA AIRPORT AWOS |PAAK|2000-2006| 15.1 15.1 13.1 15.0 13.4 12.4 11.9 10.7 13.5 14.5 14.7 14.4 | 13.7 BARROW AIRPORT ASOS |PABR|1996-2006| 12.2 13.1 12.4 12.1 12.4 11.5 12.6 12.5 12.6 14.0 13.7 13.1 | 12.7 BARTER ISLAND AIRPORT |PABA|1996-2006|
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Congress on the Airport Improvement Program for FY 2018
    Office of the Administrator 800 Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20591 August 26, 2020 The Honorable Michael R. Pence President United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. President: Enclosed is the 32nd Report of Accomplishments under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) for Fiscal Year 2018. As required by 49 United States Code, section 47131, this report provides information about the AIP and the Airport Land Use Compliance Program. The purpose of the AIP is to assist in airport development to meet the Nation’s current and future aviation needs, while continuing to optimize safety, capacity, and efficiency. This report summarizes Federal investments in airport infrastructure during the reporting period. A similar letter has been sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Sincerely, Steve Dickson Administrator Enclosure Office of the Administrator 800 Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20591 August 26, 2020 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Madam Speaker: Enclosed is the 32nd Report of Accomplishments under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) for Fiscal Year 2018. As required by 49 United States Code, section 47131, this report provides information about the AIP and the Airport Land Use Compliance Program. The purpose of the AIP is to assist in airport development to meet the Nation’s current and future aviation needs, while continuing to optimize safety, capacity, and efficiency. This report summarizes Federal investments in airport infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Case Studies Prepared for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities October 2011
    Economic and Community Contributions of Selected Alaska Airports: 12 Case Studies Prepared for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities October 2011 Wisdom • Trust • Relevance • Innovation Economic and Community Contributions of Selected Alaska Airports: 12 Case Studies Prepared for Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities October 2011 Prepared by Preparers Team Member Project Role Jonathan King Project Manager Alexus Bond Assistant Project Manager Alejandra Palma Riedel Economist Joel Ainsworth Project Analyst Terri McCoy Technical Editor Please cite as: Northern Economics, Inc. Economic and Community Contributions of Selected Alaska Airports: 12 Case Studies. Prepared for Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. June 2011. Contents Section Page Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. ES-1 The Airports and their Communities ............................................................................................. ES-1 Estimates of Total In-State Jobs, Labor, and Economic Output ....................................................... ES-6 Out-of-State Economic Effect ...................................................................................................... ES-10 Return on Annual Maintenance and Operating Costs
    [Show full text]
  • FAA FY 15-17 DBE Goal Approval
    U.S. Department Federal Aviation Administration Civil Rights Office, ACR-4 of Transportation Western-Pacific Region Headquarters 15000 Aviation Blvd. Federal Aviation Lawndale, CA 90261 Administration Reply to: Alaskan Region MAY 04 2015 Mary Siroky, Division Director Department ofTransportation and Public Facilities Civil Rights Office P.O. Box 196900 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6900 Dear Ms. Siroky: This letter is in reference to the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) fiscal year (FY) 2015 thru 2017 goal that you submitted for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF) - Central Region ofAirports, Alaska. Based on our review, we have determined that the goal meet the standards in 49 CFR Part 26, Department ofTransportation regulations. The goal is described as follows: FY 15-17 overall DBE goal: 8.3 % DBE Participation To be obtained through 8.3 % Race-Neutral and 0.0 % Race-Conscious means (Covering the period October I, 2014 through September 30, 2017) The above FY 15-17 overall DBE goal covers the attached list of ADOT&PF ' s Central Region of Airports federal funded projects to be advertised during fi scal years 2015 thru 2017. DBE Accomplishments continue to be due annually on December 1 for the previous fi scal year. Accomplishments can be submitted either through our new dbE-Connect system at at www.faa.dbeconnect.com/F AA/ login.asp or by completing the Uniform Report of DBE Awards/Commitments and Payments form and submitting via email to [email protected]. If you need a dbE-Connect user account, please contact Ricky Watson at phone (310) 725-3940.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers and Climate of the Upper Susitna Basin, Alaska
    Discussions Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2018-155 Earth System Manuscript under review for journal Earth Syst. Sci. Data Science Discussion started: 3 May 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Access Open Data Glaciers and Climate of the Upper Susitna Basin, Alaska Andrew Bliss1,2, Regine Hock2, Gabriel Wolken3, Erin Whorton3,4, Caroline Aubry-Wake2,5, Juliana Braun2,6, Alessio Gusmeroli7, Will Harrison2, Andrew Hoffman2, Anna Liljedahl8, and Jing Zhang9 1Department of Anthropology, Colorado State University, 1787 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 2Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA 3Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK, USA 4USGS Washington Water Science Center, Tacoma, WA, USA 5Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 6Willis Re, London, UK 7International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA 8Water & Environmental Research Center and International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA 9Department of Physics and Department of Energy & Environmental Systems, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA Correspondence: Andrew Bliss ([email protected]) Abstract. As part of a proposed hydropower facility, extensive field observations were conducted in the Upper Susitna basin, a 13,289 km2 glacierized catchment in central Alaska in 2012-2014. This paper describes a comprehensive data set of meteo- rological, glacier mass balance, snow cover and soil measurements, as well as the data collection and processing. Results are compared to similar observations from the 1980s. Environmental lapse rates measured with weather stations between about 5 1000 and 2000 m a.s.l.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are Laanc Facilities in My Area?
    WHERE ARE LAANC FACILITIES IN MY AREA? Updated with LAANC Expansion Facilities! December 2019 Houston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ZHU) Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport (BRO), Mobile Regional Airport (MOB), Salina Regional Airport (SLN), South Central Brownsville, TX Mobile, AL Salina, KS Easterwood Field (CLL), Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport (BTR), Philip Billard Municipal Airport (TOP), College Station, TX Baton Rouge, LA Topeka, KS Conroe-North Houston Regional Airport (CXO), Lafayette Regional Airport (LFT), Mount Vernon Airport (MVN), Houston, TX Lafayette, LA Mt Vernon, IL Scholes International At Galveston Airport (GLS), Austin–Bergstrom International Airport (AUS), Quincy Regional Airport (UIN), Galveston, TX Austin, TX Quincy, IL Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU), Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP), Chanute Martin Johnson Airport (CNU), Georgetown, TX Corpus Christi, TX Chanute, KS Valley International Airport (HRL), Aransas County Airport (RKP), Dodge City Regional Airport (DDC), Harlingen, TX Rockport, TX Dodge City, KS San Marcos Regional Airport (HYI), San Antonio International Airport (SAT), Emporia Municipal Airport (EMP), Austin, TX San Antonio, TX Emporia, KS Laredo International Airport (LRD), Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY), Hays Regional Airport (HYS), Laredo, TX Kenner, LA St, Hays, KS McAllen Miller International Airport (MFE), William P. Hobby Airport (HOU), Lawrence Municipal Airport (LWC), McAllen, TX Houston, TX Lawrence, KS Sugar Land Regional Airport
    [Show full text]
  • 06-'12, Rural Airports AIP Spending Plan October 20, 2010 DOT/PF, Statewide Aviation
    Draft FFY '06-'12, Rural Airports AIP Spending Plan October 20, 2010 DOT/PF, Statewide Aviation APEB LOCID Project Score Ph FFY'06 FFY'07 FFY'08 FFY'09 FFY'10 FFY'11 FFY'12 After FFY'12 Rural Primary Airports Primary Airfield Projects ANI Aniak Airport Improvements 130 2,3,4 $ 4,700,000 BRW Barrow Apron Expansion 88 2,4 $ 7,000,000 BRW Barrow RWY-Apron Paving/ SA Expan-Stg 3 124 2,4$ 3,000,000 BRW Barrow RWY-Apron Paving/ SA Expan-Stg 4 124 2,4 $ 7,200,000 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 2 BET (GA Apron Expansion) 130 2,4$ 5,701,583 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 3 (Parallel Runway Gravel Surface and BET Lighting) 160 2,4$ 2,733,217 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 4 (Parallel Runway Gravel Surface and BET Lighting) 160 2,4$ 5,877,983 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 5 BET (Parallel Runway Paving) 160 2,4$ 3,277,634 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 6 BET (ROW) 130 2,4 $ 1,650,000 BET Bethel West Heavy Apron Expansion 101 2,4 $ 4,000,000 Bethel Airport RWY / TWY / Commerical BET Apron Pavement Rehabilitation (C) N/A 2,4 $ 13,000,000 Bethel Airport RWY / TWY / Commerical BET Apron Pavement Rehabilitation N/A 2,4 $ 13,000,000 BET Bethel South GA Apron Reconstruction (C) N/A 2,4 $ 4,700,000 BET Bethel South GAApron Reconstruction N/A 2,4 $ 4,700,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 1 113 2,4$ 4,499,980 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 2 113 2,4 $ 8,500,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 2 (C) 113 2,4 $ 8,500,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 3 113 2,4 $ 6,700,000 CDV Cordova Apt RSA Expan - Stg 2 N/A 2,4$ 4,346,424 CDV Cordova Apt RSA Improvements (Paving) 65 2,4$ 650,000 Note: Spending Plan contains entitlement and discretionary funded projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers and Climate of the Upper Susitna Basin, Alaska
    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 403–427, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-403-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Glaciers and climate of the Upper Susitna basin, Alaska Andrew Bliss1,2, Regine Hock2, Gabriel Wolken3, Erin Whorton3,4, Caroline Aubry-Wake2,5, Juliana Braun2,6, Alessio Gusmeroli7, Will Harrison2, Andrew Hoffman2, Anna Liljedahl8, and Jing Zhang9 1Department of Anthropology, Colorado State University, 1787 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 2Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USA 3Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707, USA 4USGS Washington Water Science Center, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA 5Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 1K2, Canada 6Willis Re, London, EC3M 7DQ, UK 7International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA 8Water & Environmental Research Center and International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-5860, USA 9Department of Physics and Department of Energy & Environmental Systems, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA Correspondence: Andrew Bliss ([email protected]) Received: 7 December 2018 – Discussion started: 3 May 2019 Revised: 28 January 2020 – Accepted: 29 January 2020 – Published: 18 February 2020 Abstract. Extensive field observations were conducted in the Upper Susitna basin, a 13 289 km2 glacierized catchment in central Alaska in 2012–2014. This paper describes the comprehensive data set of meteorological, glacier mass balance, snow cover, and soil measurements, as well as the data collection and processing. Re- sults are compared to similar observations from the 1980s.
    [Show full text]