Novel Capacitive Sensors for Chemical and Physical Monitoring in Microfluidic Devices
A dissertation presented to
the faculty of
the Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University
In partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Parthiban Rajan
May 2019
© 2019 Parthiban Rajan. All Rights Reserved. 2
This dissertation titled
Novel Capacitive Sensors for Chemical and Physical Monitoring in Microfluidic Devices
by
PARTHIBAN RAJAN
has been approved for
the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
and the Russ College of Engineering and Technology by
Savas Kaya
Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Dennis Irwin
Dean, Russ College of Engineering and Technology 3
Abstract RAJAN, PARTHIBAN, Ph.D., May 2019, Electrical Engineering Novel Capacitive Sensors for Chemical and Physical Monitoring in Microfluidic Devices Director of Dissertation: Savas Kaya Lab-on-a-Chip (LoC) devices integrate the elements of advanced electronics and microfluidic technology to create robust, cost-effective, state-of-the-art chemical, environmental and biomedical analysis platforms to be used for wearable health monitors, analytical monitoring and portable point-of-care diagnostics solutions. Demand in these applications are expected to grow exponentially in next decade and efficient, low-cost capable microfluidics platforms can define the success of this on-going revolution along with the printed electronics (PE) that enhance the capability, affordability and scalability of LoC systems. Key to design of such compact and low-cost LoC systems is the variety, size and capabilities of novel nanosensors. Accordingly, this dissertation aims at fusing the PE and microfluidic technology in creating application- specific novel LOC devices. In particular, the vast prospects of capacitive sensing technology have been comprehensively explored. By altering the printed capacitive design elements, microfluidic design and flow properties, a number of novel nanosensors categorized into capacitance based physical and chemical capacitive sensors have been developed. In this dissertation, the concept of capacitive sensing, with a distinct focus on planar printed interdigitated capacitors (IDC) integrated into microfluidic devices, has been investigated. Initial focus has been on process development for efficient activation of printing surfaces for IDC fabrication and microfluidic integration. Force-spectroscopy via an atomic-force microscopy was used to guide this development work, which has not been explored previously. Together with accompanying software development and 3D printed molds, an efficient platform for sensor enriched microfluidic devices is developed. It is shown that low-cost and scalable capacitors that can be printed on flexible media and glass can be adapted to detect multiple physical and chemical parameters. Starting from an analytical approximation of printed IDC and fully utilizing the dielectric loading effect, novel sensors were designed and developed for a variety of sensing 4 modalities including proximity and motion, temperature, humidity, electro-kinetic flow, ionic concentrations (proton and divalent metal ions such as Zn, Cu, Ni) in unique microfluidic designs. Based on these distinct sensing approaches, novel device arrangements that include cross-shaped IDCs on flexible paper surfaces, or nanogap capacitors with ~10nm electrode gaps have been adapted as effective and suitable sensing elements in future applications. Thus, this research work provides both principle and practical basis for development of highly capable and flexible capacitive sensing platforms in an upcoming era where effective use of computational resources and CMOS compatibility may become the key enabler for environmental, chemical and biomedical monitoring systems. 5
Dedication
To Dad, Mom and Bavya.
6
Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dr. Savas Kaya, my mentor, for always backing me up on my journey through this PhD. His suggestions, motivation, training and guidance in both academic and personal life, for the past 8 years has been one of the primary reasons this work has developed into what it is now. I would like to thank Dr. Wojciech Jadwisienczak for being another important part of this PhD journey. Dr.J has been one of the best professors I have worked with. He has been a solid support and inspiration. I would like to thank Dr. Craig Nunemaker, who has been a strong support in making this collaborative work possible. He has always explained patiently about the biological part of this study, constantly motivated me and pushed me towards achieving goals in this research. I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Avinash Karanth, Dr. Monica Burdick and Dr. David Tees for their support, time and feedback. I am grateful to them for being a part of my PhD committee. This PhD would not have been possible without the love and support from my family. My dad, my hero, Dr. Rajan, my mom Dr. Amaravathy Rajan and sister Dr. Bavya Rajan. I am out of words to express my love and gratitude to them. Next, I would love to thank my brother Shankar Narayanan. The one person who has seen me grow and been with me, supporting me, holding me and pushing me to success my entire life. I would like to thank him for all his guidance and advice in helping me develop all the software tools in this work by training me on the software development part (Thama, thank you da). I would like to thank Akanksha Rohit, for coming into my life, for travelling with me through this journey and being there for me every minute of the day. She has been one of the reasons which helped me stay focused and strong at all stages of my PhD. I would like to thank my brothers Thoshy Felix, Aby Abraham, Jayakrishnan Muraleedharan Nair and Sai Goutham Koya. Thank you for just being there and supporting me every single time and through all sorts of phases in life, all these years. You guys are the best. Next, I would like to thank Jason Wright, my friend, my roommate and one of the most inspiring person I have ever met in life. Thank you, buddy. For all the late-night research talks and support you have given me all these years. I would like to thank Patrick Hanlon, Tianyi Cai, Nicholas Whitticar and Akanksha Rohit for all their help and contributions in this research. Their help definitely made me more productive in achieving results on time.
7
Table of Contents Page Abstract ...... 3 Dedication ...... 5 Acknowledgments...... 6 List of Tables ...... 11 List of Figures ...... 12 List of Abbreviations ...... 20 Chapter 1: Introduction ...... 21 1.1 Sensor Integrated Microfluidics – Lab-on-a-Chip ...... 21 1.2 Motivation ...... 23 1.3 Sensor Fusion Era...... 24 1.4 Research Goals & Accomplishments ...... 25 1.4.1 Research Goals ...... 25 1.4.2 Accomplishments ...... 26 1.5 Dissertation Characteristics & Organization ...... 27 Chapter 2: Background ...... 29 2.1 Nanoscience and Surface Study ...... 29 2.1.1 Activated Surfaces ...... 31 2.2 Lab-on-a-chip (LoC) – Microfluidic Devices ...... 33 2.2.1 Evolution of Microfluidic Devices ...... 34 2.2.2 Types of Microfluidic Devices ...... 36 2.2.2.1 Traditional Microfluidic Devices ...... 37 2.2.2.2 Paper Microfluidics ...... 38 2.2.3 Fluid Mechanics in a Microfluidic Channel ...... 40 2.3 Printed Electronics ...... 42 2.3.1 Types of Printing ...... 43 2.4 Bio & Chemical Sensors ...... 45 2.4.1 Types of Biosensors...... 47 2.5 Capacitive Chemical Sensors ...... 50 2.5.1 Capacitance – An overview ...... 50 2.5.2 Types of Printed Capacitors ...... 52 2.5.3 Capacitive Sensors – State of Art ...... 53 8
Chapter 3: Integrated LoC Capacitive-Sensor – Process Development ...... 55 3.1 Surface Study ...... 55 3.1.1 Introduction ...... 55 3.1.2 Materials & Methods ...... 56 3.1.3 Surface Activation ...... 56 3.1.4 Surface Characterization ...... 57 3.1.5 Verification of Surface Activation ...... 57 3.1.6 Optimization of Surface Activation ...... 61 3.1.7 Implications for Printing ...... 64 3.2 Microfluidics ...... 66 3.2.1 Fabrication ...... 66 3.2.1.1 PDMS Microfluidics ...... 66 3.2.1.2 Paper Microfluidics ...... 71 3.2.2 Flow Integration – Syringe Pump ...... 72 3.2.3 Microfluidics Summary ...... 74 3.3 Printed Capacitors ...... 74 3.3.1 Introduction ...... 75 3.3.2 Sensing Platform...... 78 3.3.2.1 Types of CDC ...... 79 3.3.2.2 Noise Elimination ...... 80 3.4 Chapter Summary ...... 82 Chapter 4: Capacitive Physical Sensors ...... 84 4.1 Capacitive – Flow Sensor ...... 84 4.1.1 Electro-osmosis – Integral boundary layer analysis ...... 84 4.1.1.1 Surface driven flow properties ...... 84 4.1.1.2 Integral Boundary Analysis ...... 86 4.1.2 Hagen-Poiseuille Law...... 90 4.1.3 Hydraulic Capacitance – Compliance ...... 92 4.1.4 EDL & Debye Length...... 94 4.1.5 Comprehensive background behind capacitive-flowrate sensor ...... 95 4.1.6 Design and development ...... 98 4.1.7 Results ...... 100 9
4.1.7.1 Pure polar fluids ...... 100 4.1.7.2 Ionic Polar Fluids ...... 104 4.1.7.3 Capacitive-pH sensor ...... 110 4.1.8 Summary ...... 112 4.2 Capacitive-Thermometer (CapT) ...... 113 4.2.1 Design and Development for CapT ...... 115 4.2.2 Results ...... 118 4.2.2.1. Proof of concept ...... 118 4.2.2.2 Printed IDC Thermometer ...... 120 4.2.2.3 Enhancing Capacitive-Thermometer Response ...... 121 4.2.2.4 Flexible Paper CapT ...... 125 4.2.2.5 IDC Humidity Response ...... 127 4.2.3 CapT Summary ...... 130 4.3 Motion (Counting) Sensor ...... 131 4.3.1 Design and Development...... 131 4.3.2 Results ...... 133 4.3.2.1 Sonoplot printed capacitive-motion sensor ...... 133 4.4 Nanogap Capacitors ...... 138 4.5 Chapter Summary ...... 140 5.1 Introduction ...... 142 5.2 Capacitive-Chemical Sensors ...... 143 5.2.1 Magadiite ...... 143 5.2.2 Ion Exchange Resins (IER) ...... 144 5.3 Design and Development ...... 146 5.4 Results ...... 147 5.4.1 Proof of Concept ...... 147 5.4.2 Integration of Magadiite Zn Sensor ...... 154 5.4.3 Ion Exchange Resin Based Capacitive Heavy Metal Sensors ...... 156 5.4.4 Three Chamber Design ...... 160 5.4.5 Software Development – CionXR ...... 165 5.5 Chapter Summary ...... 168 Chapter 6: Conclusions and Future Work ...... 170 10
6.1 Conclusions ...... 170 6.2 Future Work ...... 174 References ...... 177 Appendix A ...... 203 Appendix B ...... 205 Appendix C ...... 206 Appendix D ...... 207 Appendix E ...... 209 Appendix F...... 210 Appendix G ...... 219 Appendix H ...... 220 Appendix I ...... 222 Appendix J ...... 226
11
List of Tables Page Table 2.1 Product-Technology impact analysis for LoC (L-Low, M- Medium & H- High)...... 34 Table 2.2 Properties of PDMS ...... 38 Table 2.3 Calculation of Reynolds Number for a typical microfluidic channel...... 41 Table 2.4 Evolution of Bio and Chemical Sensors [115]...... 46 Table 3.1 Qualitative Comparison of major techniques used for surface activation...... 56 Table 3.2 Contact angle measurements for different activation conditions and plasma gases...... 58 Table 3.3 Comparison of master mold fabrication techniques...... 68 Table 3.4 Comparison of Sonoplot Microplotter and Dimatix Printer...... 76 Table 3.5 Modelled capacitance vs Measured capacitance...... 77 Table 3.6 Comparison of CDC's used for sensor characterization...... 80 Table 4.1 Comparison of Ohm’s law and Hagen-Poiseuille’s Law...... 92 Table 4.2 Comparison of capacitance in a fluidic and electrical systems...... 93 Table 4.3 Magnitude and slope of flow rate responses shown in Fig. 4.14...... 103 Table 4. 4 Magnitude and slope of flow rate responses shown in Fig. 4.17...... 106 Table 4.5 Magnitude and slope of flow rate responses shown in Fig. 4.18...... 109 Table 4.6 Comparison of sensor characteristics of Capacitive-flowrate sensor vs Commercial flowrate sensor ...... 113 Table 4.7 Results of Bend test on CapT Quad sensor...... 126 Table 4.8 Comparison of sensor characteristics of CapT vs Commercial thermocouple...... 129 Table 4.9 Capacitor dimensions of Fig. 4.43...... 133 Table 4.10 Applications and future work of capacitive-flowrate sensors...... 141 Table 5.1 Design Parameters used for the printed capacitive sensors...... 147
12
List of Figures Page Figure 1.1 (a) Comparison of traditional lab analysis vs LoC analysis (b) An illustration of LoC blood test kit [1], [2]...... 22 Figure 1.2 Illustration of LoC concept [3]...... 24 Figure 1.3 Illustration of concept of sensor-data fusion for effective health monitoring [7]...... 25 Figure 2.1 Comparison of methods to create nanomaterials (Top-down vs Bottom- up approach) [25]...... 30 Figure 2.2 Representation of Silinol Bonds on Glass substrate[32]...... 32 Figure 2.3 Building active sensors on activated surfaces [34]...... 32 Figure 2.4 Illustration of LoC concept [35]...... 33 Figure 2.5 Illustration of a microfluidic LoC device [50]...... 35 Figure 2.6 Traditional microfluidic device fabrication process flow[66]...... 37 Figure 2. 7 Chemical Structure of PDMS [71]...... 37 Figure 2.8 A paper based microfluidic device example and its main advantages [76]. ... 39 Figure 2.9 Paper based MEMS sensor with strain response [92]...... 40 Figure 2.10 Navier-Stokes equation indicating the forces acting on a fluid in a microchannel...... 41 Figure 2.11 Future Flexible devices along with IDTechEx Market Research displaying the impact of PE on future technology [98], [99]...... 43 Figure 2.12 Printing methods to create PE devices [101]...... 44 Figure 2.13 Printed capacitor on (a) PET and (b) Cannon Extra Glossy Paper...... 45 Figure 2.14 Venn-diagram demonstrating the significance of biochemical sensors...... 46 Figure 2.15 Wearable health monitors will lead to a boom in bio-medical sensor market as anticipated by CCC Insight market research [116]...... 47 Figure 2.16 Architecture of sensor - from analyte to end-user display...... 48 Figure 2.17 Difference between electrode functionalization (common) and dielectric functionalization (this dissertation)...... 49 Figure 2.18 Structure and working of a traditional parallel plate capacitor[178]...... 50 Figure 2.19 Structural comparison of a) Parallel Plate b) IDC[179]...... 50 Figure 2.20 a) Layout and b) Cross-section of an IDC [180]...... 51 13
Figure 2.21 Equivalent circuit of a 6-finger IDC [180]...... 52 Figure 2.22 Structure and design of a) IDC b) Serpentine c) Spiral and d) Meander - capacitive sensors [181]...... 52 Figure 2.23 Capacitive signaling using antibody-antigen binding induced charge transfer or redistribution [184]...... 53 Figure 2.24 Dissertation sensor design & development flowchart...... 54 Figure 3.1 March instruments CS-1701 RIE system...... 56 Figure 3.2 Contact mode AFM force spectroscopy process on an activated surface...... 57 Figure 3.3 AFM spectroscopy F-d curves comparing activated and unactivated surfaces using colloidal tips...... 59 Figure 3.4 XPS study of activated surfaces displaying variation in O1s and Si2p spectra...... 60 Figure 3.5 AFM topographical scans of a) Si control sample and plasma activated samples at power levels of b) 45 W, c) 100W and d) 250 W...... 61 Figure 3.6 Surface energy plots obtained from F-d curve averages for varying activation process parameters: time, pressure and flow rate...... 63 Figure 3.7 Correlation between contact angle and F-d curve averaging of surface energy for varying plasma power levels...... 63 Figure 3.8 Temporal study of surface stiction energy for two different Si surfaces activated at 100 W and 250 W. Inset gives the same data in linear y-scale...... 64
Figure 3.9 Optical image (30x) showing the impact of O2 plasma activation on PDMS surfaces used as substrates for inkjet printing...... 65 Figure 3.10 Improvement of features on activated glass substrates in Capacitors printed using Dimatix printer...... 65 Figure 3.11 Master mold and microchannel fabrication process flow...... 68 Figure 3.12 300µm channels bonded to glass substrate after surface activation...... 69 Figure 3.13 Warner Instruments 22mm diameter culture/imaging chamber...... 70 Figure 3.14 a) Bottom chamber and b) Top chamber of concentrated insulin 2-layer microfluidic device...... 70 Figure 3.15 a) Xerox was printer used to create the b) printed and cured paper microfluidic channels...... 71 14
Figure 3.16 Paper microfluidic capacitive-quad sensor showing the was printed microchannel side and printed sensor side...... 72 Figure 3.17 Arrangement of Syringe pump fluidic setup for microfluidic channel flow. 72 Figure 3.18 Screenshot of the fluid control interface and programmable flow control software...... 73 Figure 3.19 a) Ca2+ fluorescence response of 9 islets to glucose stimulation induced by forced oscillations. b) Average of overall response given in Fig 3.19a [202]...... 74 Figure 3.20 Sonoplot Microplotter used to print printed passive sensing elements...... 75 Figure 3.21 Fujifilm Dimatix Material Printer (DMP-2831)...... 76 Figure 3.22 Capacitive sensor integrated microfluidic device...... 78 Figure 3.23 Test setup used for sensor integrated microfluidic device characterization. . 79 Figure 3.24 Sensing Solution EVM GUI control panel and real-time data interface...... 80 Figure 3.25 Printed shield around the capacitor to eliminate environmental noises...... 81 Figure 3.26 Demonstration of improvement in signal quality with shield implemented in the design...... 81 Figure 3.27 Interface of "Data Cleanser" GUI developed using C#...... 82 Figure 3. 28 Spin-speed vs Thickness curves for Su-8 Negative tone photoresist ...... 203 Figure 3. 29 Process Flow of master mold creation process using soft-lithography...... 204 Figure 4.1 Glass surface with a drop of electrolyte...... 85 Figure 4.2 Silinol bonds present on a glass surface...... 85 Figure 4.3 Boundary conditions in an infinitesimal volume from wall of a microfluidic channel...... 86 Figure 4.4 Types of field in the microfluidic channel...... 87 Figure 4. 5 Optical view of the surface driven flow in a microfluidic channel...... 90 Figure 4.6 Cylindrical channel with a pressure driven flow...... 91 Figure 4.7 Hagen-Poiseuille’s Law - Pressure driven volumetric flux in a microchannel...... 91 Figure 4.8 EDL formation inside a microfluidic channel...... 94 Figure 4.9 Pressure driven flow in a microfluidic channel...... 96
Figure 4.10 Intercept of ρE and U distribution inside the Debye length...... 97 Figure 4.11 Dimatix printed capacitive-flowrate sensor...... 99 15
Figure 4.12 Capacitive-flowrate sensor test setup...... 100 Figure 4.13 Comprehensive response of varying flow rate test using DI water...... 101 Figure 4.14 Capacitive flow rate responses of DI flow with magnified images showing unique increasing area with flow rates (yellow – 0.5 mL/min, red – 1 mL/min & green – 2mL/min)...... 102 Figure 4.15 Comprehensive Capacitive-flowrate sensor response for varying ethanol flow rates...... 103 Figure 4.16 Comprehensive Capacitive-flowrate sensor response for varying 1% w/v Nickel Acetate in DI flow rates...... 104 Figure 4.17 Capacitive flow rate responses of Nickel Acetate flow with magnified images showing unique increasing area with flow rates...... 105 Figure 4.18 Comprehensive Capacitive-flowrate sensor response for varying 10% w/v Nickel Acetate in DI water flow rates...... 106 Figure 4.19 Overlay of applied pressure gradient pulse compared to the capacitive response for a 2 mL/min flow-rate...... 107 Figure 4.20 Capacitive flow rate responses of 10% w/v Nickel Acetate in DI flow with magnified images showing unique increasing area with flow rates...... 108 Figure 4.21 Capacitive-flowrate sensor response to flow of 0.1% w/v Nickel Acetate in Ethanol...... 109 Figure 4.22 Capacitive flow-rate response at fixed flow rate (2mL/min) for pH = 11 solution...... 110 Figure 4.23 Capacitive flow-rate response at fixed flow rate (2 mL/min) for pH = 3 solution with magnified view. The large lob is the result of initial transient and most likely caused by an air bubble that got stuck and released, which drops the capacitor...... 111 Figure 4.24 3D representation of LoC created with microfluidic channel capped over the printed passive electrodes ...... 114 Figure 4.25 Thermal response of a standard ceramic capacitor (C = 10nF)...... 115 Figure 4.26 a) Capacitance dependence on the frequency sweep for printed IDC’s used for comparison and control b) Printed IDCs on 4 different substrates...... 117 16
Figure 4.27 Experimental Setup: A – Printed Interdigitated Capacitor (IDC), B – Teca Hot/Cold plate, C – Computer control/monitor station and D – Capacitance Sensing Chip...... 118 Figure 4.28 Parallel plate capacitors - test setup...... 119 Figure 4.29 Parallel plate capacitive response to temperature sweep at different humidity levels...... 119 Figure 4.30 Humidity sweep at a fixed temperature (35ºC) parallel plate capacitors. As expected parallel plate shields the capacitors from any significant variations ...... 120 Figure 4.31 Filtered data showing the condensation effect observed on printed capacitors on glass substrate. Humidity level of 50% was higher than standard measurements...... 121 Figure 4.32 Capacitance vs temperature plots (polynomial fits) of printed capacitors on glass substrate with control air (no filler) and different polymeric dielectric fillers atop. Humidity level of 50% was higher than standard measurements...... 122 Figure 4.33 Capacitance vs temperature plots (polynomial fits) of printed capacitors on PA and PI substrates. Humidity level was standard 35%...... 123 Figure 4.34 Comparison of effects of different polymer fillers on the capacitance and thermal response...... 124
Figure 4.35 BaTiO3 filler thermal response enhancements: 44.7% results from
BaTiO3/PVDF nanocomposite filler (left) vs 37.3% from BaTiO3/PVDF thin film substrate...... 124 Figure 4.36 Thermal response of flexible IDC sensors printed on a) PET and b) PHD X98 paper substrate at humidity levels test1=35% and test2=50%...... 125 Figure 4.37 a) IDC thermometer quad sensor printed on PHD X98 glossy paper and b) its bending response...... 126 Figure 4.38 Response of a IDC thermometer on glass substrate under different humidity conditions...... 127 Figure 4.39 Inkjet printed - paper substrate capacitive response to temperature sweep at different humidity levels...... 128 Figure 4. 40 CapT plot used for comparative analysis...... 129 Figure 4.41 3D printed Microfluidic mold used to create the capacitive-count sensor. . 131 17
Figure 4.42 Significance of channel height design in a capacitive-count sensor...... 132 Figure 4.43 Capacitive-motion sensors Sonoplot printed IDCs are used in this work. .. 133 Figure 4.44 Proximity Sensitivity of Sonoplot capacitive-motion sensor to human finger that approach to the IDC in four intervals...... 134 Figure 4.45 Capacitive change between (a) DI (b) Ethanol & (c) IPA in comparison to control air capacitance. Pulses shows the sensitivity of the microfluidic system to finger taps to the top of the PDMS chamber...... 135 Figure 4.46 Capacitive-motion sensor detecting air pockets (1mm±0.4mm diameter) in a steady ethanol flow (100µL/min)...... 136 Figure 4.47 Capacitive-motion sensor detecting air pockets (4mm±1mm diameter) in a steady ethanol flow (100µL/min)...... 136 Figure 4.48 Capacitive drift in baseline capacitance caused due to flow dynamics...... 137 Figure 4. 49 a)Nanogap capacitors with Al-Au electrodes and 10nm gap in between the electrodes b) SEM image showing the 10nm gap between the electrodes [240]...... 138 Figure 4.50 Nanogap capacitors - capacitive response & temperature response comparison at different humidity levels...... 139 Figure 4. 51 Humidity sweep at a fixed temperature (35ºC) showing capacitive response of nanogap and paper capacitors (Inset - humidity sweep applied)...... 139 Figure 5.1 Depiction of dielectric loading method employed in capacitive-chemical sensor...... 143 Figure 5.2 Difference in adsorption vs adsorption (used in this study) process...... 144 Figure 5.3 Chemical structure of Sodium Silicate chain...... 144 Figure 5.4 Structure of Dowex G26 IER beads...... 145 Figure 5.5 Optical view (50x magnification) of DG26 H-form IER with chemical- termination representation...... 146
Figure 5.6 Response of uncured Na2SiO3 (liquid form) to varying Zn(CH3COO)2 concentrations...... 148 2 Figure 5.7 Response of cured Na2SiO3 to Zn + ions – Changing the ratio between DI water and 15% Zinc Acetate solution...... 149
Figure 5. 8 Concentration vs Capacitance relationship for Na2SiO3 capping layer for Zn2+ ion detection...... 150 18
Figure 5.9 Sensitivity of Na2CO3 capping dielectric to 15% Zn(CH3COO)2 drop test. . 151
Figure 5.10 Response of Na2SiO3+ Na2CO3 cured capping layer for 15%
Zn(CH3COO)2 drop test...... 152
Figure 5. 11 Concentration vs Capacitance relationship for Na2SiO3+Na2CO3 composite capping layer for Zn2+ ion detection...... 152 Figure 5.12 Zinc adsorbed capacitive ramp caused by a pressure driven pulse inside the microfluidic channel...... 154
Figure 5.13 Optical Images (10x magnification) of different Na2SiO3 capping layers cured at identical conditions...... 155 Figure 5.14 Bottom view of the IER’s used as a capping layer on the printed IDC...... 156 Figure 5.15 Two-layer microchannel integration with a) top chamber for fluid flow and b) bottom chamber for resin holder...... 157 Figure 5.16 Cross sectional sketch depicting the assemble of IER on printed sensor. ... 158 Figure 5.17 a) Concentration vs Relative Dielectric constant for ionic solutions [263] b) Adsorption timeline for the cationic IER [264], [265] ...... 158 Figure 5.18 Capacitive response of IER to Cu adsorption with the solvent being the dielectric...... 159 Figure 5.19 Three Chamber Design concept for metal ion detection using IER...... 160 Figure 5.20 Capacitive response of three-chamber measurement setup with inset1 (right) showing the ion exchange process setup and inset2 (left) showing the 2+ discolored/swollen IER upon adsorption of 1% w/v NiCl2 in DI water carrying Ni ions @ 50µL/min flow rate...... 162 Figure 5.21 Capacitive response of three-chamber measurement setup for 1% w/v of 2+ ZnCl2 in DI water carrying Zn ions @ 50µL/min flow rate...... 163 Figure 5.22 Capacitive response of three-chamber measurement setup for 1% w/v of 2+ CuCl2 in DI water carrying Cu ions @ 20µL/min flow rate. Note that the measurement for Cap1 occurs after the chamber1 was full, therefore remains on average constant...... 163 Figure 5.23 DG26 IER – Optical image (50x) of the three stages of IER – activated, ion exchanged, and regenerated...... 164 Figure 5.24 Screenshot of the Application developed (CIonXR)...... 166 19
Figure 5.25 Prediction of ionic concentration of solution using CionXR...... 167
20
List of Abbreviations pF – Pico Farad fF – Femto Farad nm – Nanometer mm – Millimeter µm – Micrometer cm – Centimeter nL – Nanoliter pL – Picoliter mL – Milliliter µL – Microliter mM – Milli Molar µM – Micro Molar fM – Femto Molar hrs – Hours min – Minutes s – Seconds M – Molar mM – Milli Molar ºC – Degree Celsius rpm – Rotations Per Minute mTorr – Milli Torr sccm – Standard Cubic Centimeter per Minute w/v – Weight per Volume v/v – Volume per Volume
21
Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Sensor Integrated Microfluidics – Lab-on-a-Chip With increasing capabilities and rapid innovations in the area of nanoelectronics, lab-on-a-chip (LoC) systems have become one of the core area of study for researchers to pursue compact solutions for biomedical problems and enhance the analytical capabilities of integrated electronics interfacing liquid samples, an example of which is provided in Fig.1. Microfluidics is the key platform in bringing the concept of LoC into existence that had major impact on bio-chemical research, drug-development and point-of-care health care systems, especially in the last two decades. Along with the strides in microfluidic devices, the field of sensing has been continuously improving in all aspects including accuracy, sensitivity, size, cost and user friendliness. In particular, printed low-cost electronics has established its own prominence and paved the way for novel electrical, optical, magnetic, electro-chemical sensing devices built affordably on non-conventional surfaces such as glass, polymers and paper. Thus, today we are presented with a wide range of sensors of varying types and capabilities that can and are being applied to a multitude of biomedical and biochemical studies. However, since the original justification of these products were affordability and high-level integration, it is imperative to identify and exemplify low-cost, scalable, low-power and CMOS- compatible sensing solutions that can be utilized on equally low-cost and flexible substrates. This dissertation identifies capacitive sensing as this ‘unique’ sensing platform that can deliver in all fronts (low-cost, scalable, low-power, digital-CMOS compatible) of performance and offers novel capacitive solutions on a wide range of physical (temperature, humidity, flow, motion) and chemical (pH, Zn, and heavy-metal) sensing vectors using only printed capacitive elements. Besides many exciting sensors that printed electronics can offer, capacitive sensing is especially suitable for biomedical applications where the changes in chemical and physical observables such as solvent chemistry, concentration, flow, temperature or particle/cell velocity, structure and behavior are often the main interest. 22
Figure 1.1 (a) Comparison of traditional lab analysis vs LoC analysis (b) An illustration of LoC blood test kit [1], [2].
Capacitive sensing has the potential to accurately and directly monitor such changes with relatively low power using the change in the electrical properties of the solutions, proteins, cells and tissues via the dielectric polarizability of the media and/or charge redistribution on biologically relevant surfaces and time scales. Hence the field of capacitive bio-sensing has become a hot-bed of interdisciplinary activity in recent years, where (electrical) engineers empower biomedical community with ever compact, capable and low-cost sensors that can continually enhance their capabilities and introduce entirely new class of tools or methods in research. Research efforts described in this dissertation target similar gains by using novel printed capacitive sensors integrated with microfluidic devices. More specifically, the dissertation introduces the toolset developed so far to build capacitive-sensor enriched micro-fluidic devices to monitor physical and chemical parameters. Such capacitive sensors integrated with compact microfluidic devices would benefit the field of biomedicine in numerous ways. Apart from the field of biomedicine, these sensors would impact a variety of other research fields such as wearable health monitors, smart bandages, portable point-of-care instrumentation. By tuning the type, sensitivity, and location of dielectric layers and electrode geometry in capacitive sensors, interfaced to powerful and compact digital electronic systems, it is envisaged that we can provide additional analytical means to design and build low-cost LoC tools for biomedical and biochemical analysis that can be accomplished with minimal manual intervention and high efficiency.
23
1.2 Motivation Even though conventional fabrication processes have ruled the world of electronics for decades now, the goal of fabricating sensors affordably at large scale necessitates a switch from the traditional methods used for fabricating active and passive electronic components and devices. Printing has evolved to be one of the major processing technique in creating such microelectronic devices and structures. Today’s advanced material/solution printing systems can be used to fabricate passive R, C, L, structures, RF antennas and waveguides, optical elements and active devices like a transistor that act as the main sensing element in diverse application. Thus, the main motivation behind this work is to explore the limits and expand the capabilities of one of simplest yet most capable of such printed biosensors, planar interdigitated electrode capacitors, for microfluidic platforms. This opens the door to analyze and create a low- cost platform to study innumerable biomedical and biochemical processes. Although the field of biomedical engineering and biological sciences are not lacking such basic sensors and devices, many of them require expensive optical/fluorescent detections tools, highly specialized surface functioning techniques, demand the use of electrochemical amplifiers or complex fabrication sequences that cannot be scaled up for data-fusion driven and wearable LoC systems era. In this new era what is required is to integrate multitude of sensors that can work together to build multi- dimensional complex vector space which can be effectively monitored for more reliable decisions using readily available low-cost and wireless computational power and can benefit from many mature machine-learning algorithms. This would lower the resources and reaction time in many applications, from wearable health monitors and point-of-care systems to LoC systems in analytical labs, that perform wide range functions including chemical and protein detection, cell culturing, counting, sorting and drug delivery, which are few of the major experiments performed in a biomedical lab on a single glass slide, as shown in Fig. 1.2. These devices would change the way in which the modern-day biological lab would work, reducing waste of expensive analytes, lowering overall space and cost for instrumentation, reducing analysis time, improving process control, speeding up analysis by tremendous parallelization (high throughput analysis), and creating a safer (sealed) platform for chemical and biological studies. 24
Figure 1.2 Illustration of LoC concept [3].
Even the simple sensor-less or single-sensor based microfluidic systems can offer many of the benefits listed above. However, the truly capable LoC systems of tomorrow require many sensors which must be low-cost and scalable to be globally and practically beneficial. By developing novel capacitive sensors and optimizing them for chemical and physical sensing problems on simple, efficient and accurate microfluidic platform, we not only can expand the capabilities of LoC systems and reduce their cost, we can also ride the new wave of sensor-fusion algorithms that shift the focus from pursuit of ‘a perfect sensor’ to study of ‘cooperative sensing’, where decisions are better than the sum of parts. 1.3 Sensor Fusion Era Sensor fusion deals with the concept of integrating and co-processing of data from multiple sensors on the same platform with a common sensor processing unit in contrast to using a single high-accuracy sensor. The aim of this technology is increasing the reliability of the sensor system by multiplexing data driven from many sensors [4]–[6]. Current efforts in many complex problems such as self-driven vehicles, complex life- style-driven conditions like diabetes and smart-city projects have shown that better decisions are possible when data from multiple sensors modalities are available and context for each is well understood, even though not all sensors provide the most accurate data all the time. The future of advanced sensing is focused towards this concept (Fig. 1.3). The immense potential of capacitive sensors is that they can be made in many size 25 scales and harbor multiple sensing modalities, all of which can be turned to simple capacitive measurement that CMOS electronics excel at. Although no specific algorithmic work is undertaken in this work for sensor fusion, the very premise of building and integrating multiple chemical and physical sensors all directly interfaced to CMOS electronics make capacitive sensing an ideal candidate to focus for this upcoming sensor-fusion era. Thus, a secondary motivation of this research work is the development of multiple cost-effective, simple, compact and flexible capacitive devices that can enable LoC systems to benefit from sensor fusion. It does implicitly offers capacitors as the building blocks of a scalable sensor fusion platform for LoC systems of tomorrow that are expected to define biomedical engineering in the 21st century.
Figure 1.3 Illustration of concept of sensor-data fusion for effective health monitoring [7].
1.4 Research Goals & Accomplishments 1.4.1 Research Goals Besides identifying the potential and utility in using capacitive sensors beyond touch/proximity sensing and indicating their unique position to realize sensor fusion 26 especially for the LoC systems, there are also practical goals and achievements associated with this research work. First and foremost, the present work aims to show that capacitive sensing is not fully explored at present and novel sensing solutions and vectors can be pursued using relatively simple printed capacitors. Thus, it explores several innovative ways that capacitors can be used to sense novel chemical and physical observables, by monitoring changes in the dielectric media or immediate coatings. In doing so it also has uncovered a number of other important and novel process and software developments. Thus, we can list the specific objectives of this PhD research in the following fashion. Process development for novel capacitive sensors based on interdigitated electrodes printed using novel metallic nanoinks on both relevant inorganic (glass and silicon) and low-cost organic flexible (polymer and paper) substrates. Novel sensing devices based on flexible capacitors, including quantitative determination of temperature, humidity, heavy metal and specific ion (Protons and Zn2+). Demonstration and deployment of multiple capacitors integrated onto flexible microfluidic systems for low-cost and scalable applications. 1.4.2 Accomplishments Driven by above goals, this research has enabled us to achieve a wide range of practical accomplishments, which will be expounded in the dissertation in relevant sections. They include all aspects of sensor development, from surface science to printing and electrical characterization to modeling, which are grouped below for brevity and introductory purposes: A novel surface energy characterization method for plasma activated surfaces using “AFM Force Spectroscopy” technique. Optimization of the plasma activation process for PDMS microfluidic design and efficient printing of nanoink used by two advanced printing systems (Sonoplot Microplotter 2 capillary printer and Dimatix 2831 flatbed Inkjet writer) Design and development of unique PDMS and paper microfluidic elements for capacitive monitoring via novel 3D printing tools. 27
Development and deposition of novel dielectric coatings for effective sensing of physical (temperature, humidity and motion) as well as specific ionic charges such as H+ and Zn2+ ions. Establishment of programmable fluid delivery system for microfluidic testing and portable low-cost capacitance to digital converter cards for LoC development Code development of several GUIs for mathematical modelling to predict the interdigitated electrode capacitance for given electrode geometry and substrate and data post-processing and filtering. Exploitation of electroosmotic effect to capacitively capture fluid flow and development of novel capacitive-flowrate sensor to detect flow rate of polar ionic fluids and its pH Development of a novel three chamber microfluidic design to detect heavy metal cation sensors via ion exchange resins (IER), fluid-dynamics and capacitance measurement, along with the MATLAB GUI that aids its data analysis. 1.5 Dissertation Characteristics & Organization This dissertation has a number of unique characteristics that sets it apart from prior works. The majority of existing works [8]–[12] focus on only one type of capacitor design (parallel plate, interdigitated), substrate (silicon, glass, polymer) or application (ion/protein/aptamer sensing [13]–[16], motion detection [17]–[20], or humidity [21]– [23]), which severely underestimate the great potential capacitive sensing presents. Also, the majority of these works rely upon expensive CMOS/MEMS processes to produce high quality capacitors that cannot be scaled in area, type of dielectric used, or the substrate employed. Instead of focusing on one application and design, we look into a depth and breadth of capacitive sensor applications and present a compendium of capacitive sensors on interdigitated printed capacitors suitable for wide-scale and low- cost LOC applications as well as wearable monitors. The following chapters present this unique and broad account of capacitive sensing. In particular: Chapter 2 details the fundamentals of surface study, microfluidics, printed electronics, LoC and biosensors. 28
Chapter 3 explains the integration process to create a working sensor and provides an in-depth design and development procedure for surface study, microfluidics, printed sensing elements. Chapter 4 details the list of capacitive-physical sensors which details the capacitive sensors developed to measure physical parameters like flow-rate, pH, temperature, humidity and motion. Chapter 5 explains the design, development and testing of capacitive-chemical sensors which explains the capacitive sensors developed to detect chemical parameters like heavy metal cations. Chapter 6 includes a brief summary of this research along with the potential future developments and applications.
29
Chapter 2: Background This chapter aims at introducing the basic devices, research tools. The evolution and history of each section of work is detailed along with state of art research and development in every field. Section 2.1 intends the readers to get an idea of what surface activation and the importance of this process in other segments of this project which includes printed electronics, microfluidics and sensor integration. Section 2.2 provides an overview of the concept of Lab-on-a-Chip (LoC) and microfluidic devices, its importance in field of sensors and different types of microfluidic devices with a brief explanation of fluid mechanics. Section 2.3 introduces the process of printed electronics and its importance in bio- sensors along with a comparison of various printing techniques that exist. Section 2.4 details the state of art of biosensors, providing the reader an insight of integration of LOC and printed electronics in creating the biosensors in existence. Section 2.5 particularizes on the capacitive sensors used in this project, the basic working principle, analytical approximations and the current devices that use this sensing technique. 2.1 Nanoscience and Surface Study Since nano represents length dimension measurement unit at the scale of 10-9 m, nanoscience refers to the science of materials in this regime. The properties of matter at this scale is distinct from its bulk counterparts, knowledge of which allows us to pursue novel solutions to common problems from a fundamental understanding of building blocks of matter. Humans have always learnt from nature since they walked the earth and the most advanced technologies we have developed have their roots often in the most basic sciences on the materials. For example, the most advanced integrated circuits (IC’s) start their origin as sand converted to pure silicon wafers, which are further transformed into IC’s with complex technological processes. They are fabricated with top-down approach that starts from bulk materials and arrive at intricate small devices at lower scale. This is expected to reach its limits in the next decade. Giving way to the bottom-up approach, already revolutionizing the field of molecular electronics. Thus, going from elemental materials to complex devices is an upcoming theme also for modern 30 electronics. According to Eric Drexler, the best way to comprehend the existence of modern technology is the ability to assemble matter using this bottom-up approach (Fig. 2.1) which is known as molecular nanotechnology [24].
Figure 2.1 Comparison of methods to create nanomaterials (Top-down vs Bottom-up approach) [25].
Characterization of the surface plays a major role in a broad spectrum of research areas. It’s importance in development of any kind of LoC’s is also a separate stream of research. Engineering a surface involves a deep understanding its physical or chemical properties and typically is very application specific. Its significant impact and vast research can be seen from the study of surface modification in Si-Si surface bonding [26] in the field of engineering and cell adhesion studies [27] in the field of biology. Besides these applications relevant to our research work, there are innumerable number of other research fields impacted by surface modification, which includes optics, civil engineering, mechanical engineering in a variety of applications. Today , even solar cells and LED’s utilize surface modification as a core part of their experimental process [28]. Most surface characterization include altering the roughness or the bonding on the surfaces which are modifications done in a few nanometer scales. But as the expertise grew, the surface studies have advanced into altering individual atoms on a sub 31 nanometer scale (<1 nm) using self-assembled atomic monolayers or the scanning probe tools such as STM to create specific bonds on the surface [29]. 2.1.1 Activated Surfaces Activated surfaces refer to enhancing propensity of a surface toward a specific physical or chemical interaction. Specifically, in terms of printed electronics and microfluidics fabrication it refers to enhancing hydrophobic or hydrophilic properties of a given surface before a subsequent deposition, bonding or printing process. Plasma treatment is one of the preferred methods of altering the surface property of the material of use. This is because this process is less toxic and avoids the usage of corrosive and dangerous chemicals such as piranha solution [30]. However, there are a variety of plasma processing conditions for activation, it is essential to study optimal conditions for best activation levels. Numerous studies have been performed over the past two decades on changing the surface properties of such plasma activated surfaces and its applications in device fabrication. For instance, Alam and coworkers’ study on this lifetime via XPS data showed the creation and deterioration of specific bonds leading to the change in surface properties over a given period of time [31]. Thus, in addition to creating hydrophilicity by altering surface bonds, it is also crucial to know the lifetime of such bonds created on the surface under different processing and storage conditions. In other words, temporal changes needs to be a main part of surface study for any optimized plasma activation. Surface energy is one the main properties which needs to be analyzed and studied when there is a change of surface properties. Activation of a surface breaks certain bonds on the surface of the Si which has a few nm of native oxide. The chemical changes caused on the surface have been studied in the past and the major contribution towards hydrophilicity has been reported to be due to the formation of dangling Silinol (Si – O – Si) bonds (Fig. 2.2) on the surface post-activation.
32
Figure 2.2 Representation of Silinol Bonds on Glass substrate [32].
A detailed analysis and optimization of physical, chemical and mechanical properties of the activated surface is key in determining the effectiveness of the plasma processing for a given application. Factor such as surface roughness may also affect surface energy in plasma-modified Si and SiO2 substrates which have been under study on a large scale for wafer bonding process [33]. Hence surface modification using plasma activation, should also include a comparison of surface roughness after a plasma treatment. Plasma activated surfaces have been the building blocks for fabrication of various sensing and energy harvesting devices (Fig. 2.3). Surface modification and surface chemistry plays a significant role in microfluidics and sensor development. An extensive and novel approach in characterizing the activated surfaces to precisely control the surface energy during the surface activation process has been identified and studied-in depth in this dissertation.
Figure 2.3 Building active sensors on activated surfaces [34]. 33
2.2 Lab-on-a-chip (LoC) – Microfluidic Devices LoC devices have been a bridge between academic research and commercialization in recent years. As the name indicates, LoC aims at integrating several experiments and characterization techniques performed in a research laboratory on to a single compact handheld device of dimensions ranging from a few mm to a few cm as illustrated in Fig. 2.4.
Figure 2.4 Illustration of LoC concept [35].
LoC is a blend of microfluidics and sensing technologies (electrical, optical, mechanical and electromechanical) on a single device [36]. Advancements in MEMS has also helped to significant developments in search of low-cost, reduced analyte volume (down to pL), high throughput, fast, portable, sensitive and automated LoC devices [37]– [39]. Thus, LoC system development can be considered as the ultimate playground of heterogenous integration for analytical and sensing technologies. The application of LoC devices is multifold and ever-expanding with the essential importance given to miniaturization and improvement of point-of-care diagnostic devices useful for biological, chemical and environmental studies [40]. The existing LoC technologies along with the impact it has created on the product is detailed in Table 2.1 [41].
34
Table 2.1 Product-Technology impact analysis for LoC (L-Low, M- Medium & H-High). Product Feature Technology Analysis Sample Analysis Portable Easy to use Diseases time Volume cost Size detected Microfabrication L M H H M M MEMS M M H H M M Microfluidics M M M H M H Nanosensor M L L L M L DNA Technology M L L L H H Sample Prep M H M H H M
From table 2.1, it can be observed that the number of applications of microfluidic devices are comparatively larger than other alternate technologies and is on par with the DNA Technology. These technologies do not have to be in isolation. In fact in this dissertation, an attempt to integrate bio-nano sensors and microfluidics with aid of microfabrication has been attempted, so it can be possible to create novel LoC devices with capability to study physical and chemical properties analytes. In creation of successful LoC devices, microfluidics plays a vital role. Microfluidics have developed to be an active research area on its own, especially with the recent expansion of paper-based devices that can handle and wick fluids in low-cost applicatons. The advent, evolution, state-of-art and applications of microfluidics is discussed in the subsequent sections. 2.2.1 Evolution of Microfluidic Devices Microfluidics is a field of science which requires development of micron-scale channels capable of handling “micro” volume of solutions (nL to pL), which is an essential requirement in portable wearable health monitors and point-of-care applications (PoC) [42]. Many PoCs aid in biomedical and healthcare practices by speeding up the analysis of patient samples to detect disease specific biomarkers in blood or presence of certain molecular signatures [43]–[45]. In addition, they also aid in environmental safety by detecting airborne or waterborne microorganisms [46]–[48]. Furthermore, harmful chemicals in food and water supply can be efficiently sensed [49]. What is common to many of such devices is the presence of intricate microfluidic devices that enable their operation and handle fluid transfer and processing. 35
The concept of microfluidics originated in the early 1980’s. As the name indicates, the fluid volumes when handled in such small volumes exhibit unique behavior in comparison to a normal fluid. Manipulation and control of fluids at the nanoliter and femtoliter level leads to innovation which has been the main advantage of using the concept of microfluidics. A microfluidic chip (Fig. 2.5) consists of microchannels engraved or molded on to the surface and may involve separation, mixing, manipulation and driving of fluid in the channels to create high-throughput, cost-effective, portable LoC devices.
Figure 2.5 Illustration of a microfluidic LoC device [50].
The evolution of microfluidic devices has been very fast in the last two decades in terms of miniaturization and multiplexing, especially using multi-layer fluidic networks. Using pneumatic control lines and flexibility of PDMS layers, it has advanced to a such a level that today single-cell manipulation, PCR of DNA/RNA and protein crystallization can be accomplished. Other significant applications that exploit advancements in large- scale microfluidic integration include cell culturing, protein analysis and/or synthesis, cell sorting and ordering and biological screening [51]. A comprehensive review of developments in specific areas of application can be found in references [52]–[57].
36
2.2.2 Types of Microfluidic Devices The formation of microfluidic devices involved creation of a master mold which would be a reverse replica of the actual microfluidic channel designed. One of the well- known methods for creation of this mold is through soft-lithography techniques using a negative-tone photoresist. Since the late 1980’s, there have been multiple methods to create this master mold, which has been discussed in Refs. [58]–[64] with considerable detail. Recently, the creation of master mold has been simplified considerably, after the use of 3D printing technology. Although a large number of polymeric materials have been explored in creation of microfluidic channels, PDMS has always been the most preferred material in fabrication due to its physical and chemical properties detailed in the next section. The compatibility of PDMS to CMOS devices is one of the main reasons behind the success of this polymer in the ever-growing microfluidic LoC field. In addition, with the commercialization of microfluidic LoC moving towards flexible devices, paper microfluidics have entered the world of LoC microfluidics and is considered as a more compact, foldable and flexible alternative to the PDMS microfluidics. Due to its optical clarity and ease of processing, PMMA has also been used in microfluidics applications where elastic nature of PDMS is a concern. The entire process of microfluidic channel formation can be divided into three sections [65]: a) Master-mold creation; b) Microchannel fabrication and c) Microfluidic bonding and interfacing. The development and methods evolved in creating such LoC devices is detailed in Fig. 2.6. With the advent and adaption of 3D printing many of these complicated and expensive processes can be avoided, as indicated in Figure 2.6 with the bold arrows. Augmenting this process and introducing electrodes for sensor connections is not trivial and should be done with care to avoid leakage and impact on flow dynamics. The electrical interfacing of electrodes to fluidic channel requires a lot of precision and critical design considerations which are detailed in the forthcoming sections. Much-like the 3D-printing of molds, printed electrodes also cut-down on the complexity and cost implied by Figure 2.6.
37
Figure 2.6 Traditional microfluidic device fabrication process flow[66].
2.2.2.1 Traditional Microfluidic Devices Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (Fig. 2.7) is one of the actively used materials in microfluidics accounting for its excellent physical and chemical compatibility in fabricating CMOS compatible fluidic devices. The PDMS elastomer, which is commercially available, consists of a base liquid and a curing agent. Cross-linking between the base and curing agent creates leads to the formation of a flexible elastomeric microfluidic material with physical and chemical properties detailed in Table 2.2 [67]– [70]. Flexibility and optical clarity as well as chemical and thermal stability are the main reasons behind its adoption.
Figure 2. 7 Chemical Structure of PDMS [71].
An additional advantage of PDMS is its compatibility to both biomaterials, fluids and CMOS process integration. Inertness to mechanical, chemical, environmental and 38 physical conditions have made PDMS an outstanding material of choice for LoC microfluidic device development used in bio and environmental sensors.
Table 2.2 Properties of PDMS Property (Physical/Chemical) Comments Optical Transparent in range of 240 nm to 1100 nm Thermal Insulator – Thermal conductivity (0.2 W/mK) Electrical Insulator – Breakdown Voltage (2e7 V/m) Mechanical Elastomer – Young’s Modulus (750 KPa) Surface Hydrophobic – Surface energy (20 erg/cm2) Air – Permeable Permeability Water – Impermeable Reactivity Inert to chemicals
2.2.2.2 Paper Microfluidics In many LoC applications, the analytical system must be extremely affordable since it is intended for a single use. This may be necessary to avoid contamination or biohazards, which can increase the cost of medical care considerably. As an alternative to PDMS and response to these requirements, use of paper for microfluidic systems have also become popular in the last decade. The micro-porous and fibrous structure of paper leads to whisking of water and many other polar fluids, which make it especially attractive in low volume of solutions with an active pump for fluid motion. Microfluidic paper based analytical devices, an example of which is shown in Fig 2.8, is composed of cellulose mostly, and hydrophobic barriers to divert fluids. Such a structure can be subsequently processed via printing techniques to form electrical sensors in biosensing devices, which is one of main advantages for paper to be used in microfluidic sensor applications [72]–[75]. The main disadvantage of paper is that it is not a medical grade material.
39
Biodegradability Light Weight Wide availability Cost-effective (lowest for microfluidics) Hydrophilicity (Water Wicking) Electrophoretic Capability Disposable Flexibility Low dielectric substrate
Figure 2.8 A paper based microfluidic device example and its main advantages [76].
A paper microfluidic device is created by several techniques which focus on creating hydrophobic barriers to aid the flow of fluid through the hydrophilic paper material. Wax printing, negative tone lithography and plasma activation are some of the major techniques involved in creating this hydrophobic surface on paper [77]–[86]. Paper based sensors have been explored in the past with the importance given to the strain encountered by the flexible substrate. While using passive sensing elements, the strain induced by the paper should be considered as a parasitic effect during the analyte measurement. This has been incorporated in electrochemical and resistive sensing techniques [87]–[91]. An illustration of electrochemical sensor and effect of strain on the flexible paper substrates is shown in Fig. 2.9 (Liu et al.). Paper based microfluidic devices have been also incorporated into this dissertation, since they are ideal for printing and low-cost applications. However, the natural surface roughness and strain is always a concern in characterizing a passive sensing element (capacitor) during analyte detection (physical or chemical). This is why, besides standard device structures, alternative physical and geometrical arrangements and redundancy should be explored as approaches to improve the accuracy of novel paper- based capacitor sensors as explored by four-channel parallel measurement in Chapter 4.
40
Figure 2.9 Paper based MEMS sensor with strain response [92].
2.2.3 Fluid Mechanics in a Microfluidic Channel The behavior of fluids at nanoscale and confined to a microchannels is very different from normal flow of bulk fluid. The fluid mechanics, dynamics and behavior changes at microscale have been well studied and exploited to create unique LoC devices over the years. Surface tension plays a dominant role as opposed to gravity in such small volumes of fluids that can be subjected to also very large pressure differentials. In fact, this small volume and large flow rates constitute some of the major advantages of microfluidic LoC devices. As a result, expensive analytes may be conserved and tested in high speeds which is made possible by appreciation of fluid flow in such confined volumes. A well-scaled microfluidic LoC device can easily result in massive (1/1000 or better) reductions of fluid volume under use, that can be especially important for drug development and testing. In any confined basic microfluidic or capillary flow, two of the prime parameters with significant impact on the flow are: Reynolds Number Capillary Number Reynolds number compares the inertial and viscous effects present in the fluid flow and determines the flow patterns in a microchannel. Whereas, capillary number compares the viscosity of the fluid to the surface tension of the substrate-fluid interface and determines the elasticity and capillary effects including the droplet size on the surface 41
[93]. Reynolds number can be represented as the ratio of inertial and viscous forces (Eqn. 2.1) 푓 푅 = (2.1) 푓 The Reynolds number for water in a microfluidic system with specific ranges of design considerations is given in Table 2.3.
Table 2.3 Calculation of Reynolds number for a typical microfluidic channel. Fluid Water Viscosity 1.025 cP Temperature 25ºC Density 1 g/mL Radius/Height 1 µm – 100 µm Velocity of fluid 1 m/s – 1 cm/s Reynolds Number 10-6 - 10
The Navier-Stokes equation is the primary rule governing fluid dynamic properties in fluids and also holds for a microchannel (Fig. 2.10). It expresses the momentum conservation in a capillary fluid flow.
Figure 2.10 Navier-Stokes equation (vector form) indicating the forces acting on a fluid in a microchannel.
A low Reynolds Number, which is the main regime applicable to microfluidic applications based on very small device dimensions and large pressure differentials, indicates that the viscous forces dominate the inertial forces and the LHS of equation shown in Fig. 2.10 cancels out resulting in a linear flow.
42
Electro-osmotic flow is one of the main condition in characterizing dielectrophoretic effects (DEP) [94], [95]. Surface charge manipulation to control the electroosmotic flow has been vastly explored in the past [96]. This approach also enabled the design of electro-osmotic pumps using the concept of fluid dynamics to drive a fluid flow at controlled rates in a microchannel with biasable electrodes. However, the concept of exploiting the electroosmotic properties of polar fluids to predict the flow rate of a solution in motion has never been explored in the past. In this dissertation, the electrokinetic/electroosmotic effects in combination with a surface induced electrical double layer (EDL) has been utilized to develop a capacitive flow-rate sensor which is detailed in Chapter 4. 2.3 Printed Electronics Printed electronics (PE) came into existence in early 1960’s when printed circuit boards with flexible characteristics were considered as suitable alternatives to develop future electronic devices. Albert Hanson is considered as the first person in the world who discovered the concept of printed circuits [97]. However, rapid expansion of silicon micro-chips and resulting rapid integration of electronics at chip level took away this early interest. With the Moore’s law remaining in effect for five-decades, scaling down of devices from macroscale to nanoscale, the traditional electronic devices and components is reaching to its natural limits today. Thus, interest has shifted from pure miniaturization to utility, portability and wearability of electronic devices. At this critical juncture, PE plays a crucial role since it offers alternative ways to morph existing electronic systems into daily items and come up with entirely novel applications such as flexible displays and wearable electronics. Hence, as rapid growth of conventional electronics due to Moore’s scaling slows down, PE has created a new revolution and a commercial outburst in research and industrial sectors with its key impact felt in as many field as sensors, photovoltaics, battery, displays and the traditional CMOS devices. With the continuous requirements resulting ever more capable printed systems every day and growing demand, PE is likely to become a major driver in electronics. A forecast of evolution and influence of PE for future technology is provided in Fig. 2.11.
43
Figure 2.11 Future Flexible devices along with IDTechEx Market Research displaying the impact of PE on future technology [98], [99].
PE offers novel pathways to successfully fabricate light-weight, flexible, cost- effective and scalable electronics. Besides offering entirely novel devices, PE has also helped conserve the resources needed to fabricate conventional electronic devices. In contrast to the conventional fabrication processes like lithography, which is a subtractive process, PE is an additive process for electronic device fabrication. Moreover, PE proves efficient in comparison to traditional semiconductor fabrication by providing inexpensive and high throughput devices using roll-to-roll (R2R) manufacturing toolset. In fact, R2R can drop the fabrication costs even further for PE, thus providing a huge boom for the commercial production of electronic devices. PE is turning out to be a huge success in development of directly printed sensors, photovoltaics, LED, battery and CMOS devices [99]. Its main drawback is limited resolution in high-speed printing and manufacturing, which is typically limited to ~50 microns. 2.3.1 Types of Printing PE development process can employ a variety of methods to create the desired devices. The selection of application specific printing method is dependent upon the resolution of device structure. A list of existing printing methods is shown in Fig. 2.12. For instance, the resolution of the inkjet printable device depends on the volume of ink jetted out of the nozzle. The latest devices have scaled down to droplet sizes in the range of fL using nanoplotting tools and custom designed nozzles [100]. The two major categories in printing are contact and non-contact modes. The printed technology used in this dissertation uses a piezoelectrically driven microplotter (Sonoplot®) which can perform both contact and non-contact printing to achieve a resolution in the order of few 44 microns. Sonoplot uses custom-made tips with diameter decided in accordance to the feature size requirements. The other alternative approach used in this work is a commercial material inkjet tool (Dimatix DMP-2831), which delivers the deposited materials in small droplets.
Figure 2.12 Printing methods to create PE devices [101].
One of the main fields of growth for PE is in developing low-cost and flexible devices which are compact and disposable. With its capability to print on different materials, PE changed the structure of sensors developed today and is the main reason for flexible sensors gaining prime importance in the healthcare industry. PE has been explored by a number of research groups around the world to create functionalized biosensors, transistors, LED’s, high-resolution printed patterns, bioelectronics, biological microarrays, stretchable electronics and field-effect transistors (FET’s) [102]–[112]. However, the application of PE to print high-resolution interdigitated capacitors (IDC) for a wide range of sensing applications by functionalizing the dielectric layer between the capacitance has not been accomplished yet. This dissertation focusses on developing such novel biosensors and chemical sensors interest to LoC/PoC systems and environmental applications using printed capacitive sensors integrated with microfluidics. 45
The two printing tools used in this work has proven ability to print on flexible substrates such as PET and Cannon extra glossy paper. Fig. 2.13 shows the capacitors printed on flexible substrates via Sonoplot. The typical range of such printed capacitor ranges from 500 fF to 1nF, depending on its design and area. The capacitance values can be designed to match the application requirements by varying the length, distance between and the number of fingers printed. The working of such printed and annealed capacitors should be tested and confirmed using an LCR meter, especially on paper surfaces that have rough surfaces. For glass-PDMS microfluidics, IDCs were printed on a glass slide.
Figure 2.13 Printed capacitor on (a) PET and (b) Cannon Extra Glossy Paper.
2.4 Bio & Chemical Sensors Professor Leland C. Clark Jr. (The 2005 Russ Prize recipient – Ohio University) is called the father of biosensors for his invention of the first glucose monitor. The Clark Oxygen electrode invented in 1954 is referred to as a setpoint to measure the oxygen levels in blood till date [113], [114]. Biochemical sensors are key components today and are an integral part of extended fields of research as shown in Fig. 2.14.
46
Figure 2.14 Venn-diagram demonstrating the significance of biochemical sensors.
The historical milestones for the development and evolution of biological and chemical sensors are detailed in Table 2.4 [115].
Table 2.4 Evolution of Bio and Chemical Sensors [115]. YEAR Development YEAR Development 1916 First Report of Protein Immobilization 1975 First microbe-based sensor 1922 First glass pH electrode 1975 First protein-binding Biosensor 1925 First blood pH electrode 1975 First Immunosensor 1954 Oxygen electrode 1979 Surface acoustic wave sensor 1954 pCO2 electrode 1980 Fiber-optic pH sensor 1962 First Amperometric Biosensor 1982 Fiber-optic glucose biosensor 1962 Lipid Bilayer Membrane Generation 1983 Molecular level device fabrication 1964 Piezoelectric Quartz sensor 1986 First tissue-based Biosensor 1969 First Potentiometric Biosensor 1987 First receptor-based Biosensor 1974 First commercial glucose analyzer
Healthcare industry is one of the primary commercial sectors that will benefit from developments in nanomaterials and PE technology empowering creation of novel bio-chemical sensors. In addition to hand-held compact medical LoC and PoC systems for traditional health care applications such as disease detection, analysis and drug delivery, these sensors drive today entirely novel application areas. As the technology is moving towards flexible and wearable sensing technology, preventive health monitoring systems and fitness tracking have become a part of modern life, almost like a necessity 47
(Fig. 2.15). In fact, as summarized in Fig.2.15, wearable health monitoring market is expected to grow exponentially in the next five years (2019-2024). High quality analytical tools and low-cost measurement techniques developed mainly for LoC/PoC systems, will gradually find their way to such wearable devices thanks to affordable and flexible PE technology.
Figure 2.15 Wearable health monitors will lead to a boom in bio-medical sensor market as anticipated by CCC Insight market research [116].
2.4.1 Types of Biosensors A biosensor includes a set of components to detect the analyte and turn it into an end-user display (Fig. 2.16). Apart from healthcare application, the demand for bio and chemical sensors have been escalating in field of biomedicine, tissue engineering, food industry (bacterial and fungal monitoring) and environmental applications (heavy metals, chemical and pathogen detection) [117]. 48
Figure 2.16 Architecture of sensor - from analyte to end-user display.
The first step in development of a biosensor is to determine the analyte to be detected. This could be a biological cell, gas molecules, proteins, metal ions, pH, bacteria, or nucleotides (DNA/RNA) [118]–[139]. Once the target is determined, there must be a receptor/binder/aptamer which specifically attracts the target molecule. This step is called functionalization, which can be categorized into polymers, metal binding groups, chelators, proteins, RNA’s, antibodies and enzymes [140]–[148]. The functionalization is typically done on the surface of the sensor electrodes. However, it is often a demanding chemical process that may lose its effectiveness in air and overtime. It is especially useful when a very specific molecule needs to be detected but could be expensive and limited for the same reason. In this work, we avoid electrode functionalization and instead focus on the dielectric layer (medium between the printed sensor) to induce or monitor electric charge transfer. This charge is then transduced into electric signal using capacitive sensing elements (Fig. 2.17).
49
Figure 2.17 Difference between electrode functionalization (common) and dielectric functionalization (this dissertation).
There are a number of ways to sense the analytes which include optical, electrical, electrochemical, thermal, chemical, mechanical and piezoelectric sensing [126]–[141]. Each kind of sensing has specific transducing devices to convert the detected signal into a set of raw data specific to the sensing mechanism. The raw data obtained has to be post- processed in any kind of sensor to improve SNR and eliminate parasitic caused by human and machine errors. This is usually done by filtering the data using a software tool. The converted data require further calibration to convert it to user-readable data corresponding to the analyte sensed. Calibration is not a trivial task and often determines how useful a biosensor is. The mission of the developing biosensing trend is focused on providing affordable testing devices for underdeveloped nations [165]. Integration of PE and microfluidics have had a huge impact in creating the foundation for the development of such affordable sensors in the current era [166]. There have been many applications of microfluidic devices and microfluidic integrated sensors focused in field of healthcare industries that will be highly relevant for low-cost solutions in the developing and disadvantaged countries [167]– [177].
50
2.5 Capacitive Chemical Sensors 2.5.1 Capacitance – An overview A capacitor is a fundamental passive device with the ability to store charges, due to electrostatic attraction across a polarizable medium. A traditional capacitor is represented by two parallel conductive plates of area ‘S’ separated by a finite distance
‘d’. The dielectric material has its own dielectric constant specific to each material (εr). The charge storage capacity is determined by all the above parameters and the magnitude of capacitance is calculated as shown in Fig. 2.18 [178].
Figure 2.18 Structure and working of a traditional parallel plate capacitor [178].
The difference between the structure of a parallel plate capacitor and IDC is shown in Fig. 2.19. The geometrical factors determining the capacitance in an IDC is slightly different from the traditional capacitor and is explained in the following section.
Figure 2.19 Structural comparison of a) Parallel Plate b) IDC [179].
51
The analytical expressions describing the characteristics of IDC’s is clearly detailed in the theoretical work by R. Igreja and C.J. Dias [180], who used specialized mapping transformation to simplify the complex 3D shape to flatten 2D electrodes. The basic design parameters and cross section of an IDC they consider for modeling is shown in Fig. 2.20.
Figure 2.20 a) Layout and b) Cross-section of an IDC [180].
As an example to calculate the total capacitance of a N-finger IDC, an equivalent circuit of a 6-finger IDC is shown in Fig. 2.21 where CE is the capacitance of external electrode with reference to the ground at either side of the structure and Ci is half the individual capacitance of the internal electrodes. Since symmetry conditions are different between such devices it is important to distinguish between these electrodes.
52
Figure 2.21 Equivalent circuit of a 6-finger IDC [180].
The final equation for the capacitance (C) of an IDC with at least 3 electrodes is given by eqn. 2.2. A MATLAB code utilizing this theory is provided in Appendix D. 퐶 퐶 퐶 퐶 = (푁 − 3) + 2 (2.2) 2 퐶 + 퐶