DOCSLIB.ORG

Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections RUT MITIGATION TECHNIQUES at INTERSECTIONS TECHNIQUES at RUT MITIGATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections RUT MITIGATION TECHNIQUES at INTERSECTIONS TECHNIQUES at RUT MITIGATION 5 Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections RUT MITIGATION TECHNIQUES AT INTERSECTIONS TECHNIQUES AT RUT MITIGATION This document is the fifth in a series of best practices for the design, maintenance and management of municipal roads and sidewalks. For titles of other best practices in this and other series, please refer to www.infraguide.ca. Roads and Sidewalks National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections — September 2003 1 Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections Issue No. 1.0 Publication Date: September 2003 © 2003 Federation of Canadian Municipalities and National Research Council The contents of this publication are presented in good faith and are intended as general guidance on matters of interest only. The publisher, the authors and the organizations to which the authors belong make no representations or warranties, either express or implied, as to the completeness or accuracy of the contents. All information is presented on the condition that the persons receiving it will make their own determinations as to the suitability of using the information for their own purposes and on the understanding that the information is not a substitute for specific technical or professional advice or services. In no event will the publisher, the authors or the organizations to which the authors belong, be responsible or liable for damages of any nature or kind whatsoever resulting from the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. 2 Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections — September 2003 Introduction INTRODUCTION InfraGuide – InfraGuide – Innovations and Best Practices Innovations and Best Practices Why Canada Needs InfraGuide A Knowledge Network of Excellence Canadian municipalities spend $12 to $15 billion InfraGuide´s creation is made possible through annually on infrastructure but it never seems to be $12.5 million from Infrastructure Canada, in-kind enough. Existing infrastructure is ageing while demand contributions from various facets of the industry, grows for more and better roads, and improved water technical resources, the collaborative effort of and sewer systems responding both to higher municipal practitioners, researchers and other standards of safety, health and environmental experts, and a host of volunteers throughout the protection as well as population growth. The solution country. By gathering and synthesizing the best is to change the way we plan, Canadian experience and design and manage knowledge, InfraGuide infrastructure. Only by doing helps municipalities get the so can municipalities meet maximum return on every new demands within a dollar they spend on fiscally responsible and infrastructure – while being environmentally sustainable framework, while mindful of the social and environmental implications preserving our quality of life. of their decisions. This is what the National Guide to Sustainable Volunteer technical committees and working Municipal Infrastructure (InfraGuide) seeks to groups — with the assistance of consultants and accomplish. other stakeholders — are responsible for the research and publication of the best practices. This is a system In 2001, the federal government, through its of shared knowledge, shared responsibility and shared Infrastructure Canada Program (IC) and the National benefits. We urge you to become a part of the Research Council (NRC), joined forces with the InfraGuide Network of Excellence. Whether you are Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) to create a municipal plant operator, a planner or a municipal the National Guide to Sustainable Municipal councillor, your input is critical to the quality of Infrastructure (InfraGuide). InfraGuide is both a new, our work. national network of people and a growing collection of published best practice documents for use by decision Please join us. makers and technical personnel in the public and Contact InfraGuide toll-free at 1-866-330-3350 or visit private sectors. Based on Canadian experience and our Web site for more information. We look forward to research, the reports set out the best practices to working with you. support sustainable municipal infrastructure decisions and actions in six key areas: 1) municipal roads and sidewalks 2) potable water 3) storm and wastewater 4) decision making and investment planning 5) environmental protocols and 6) transit. The best practices are available on-line and in hard copy. Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections — September 2003 3 The InfraGuide Best Practices Focus Municipal Roads and Sidewalks Sound decision making and preventive maintenance are essential to managing municipal pavement infrastructure cost effectively. Just as $1 of timely rehabilitation will save $5 of reconstruction, $1 of timely prevention will delay $5 of rehabilitation. Municipal roads and sidewalks best practices address two priorities: front-end planning and decision making to identify and manage pavement infrastructures as a component of the infrastructure system; and a preventive approach to slow the deterioration of existing roadways. The best practices set out will ensure for instance that the right treatment is selected for the right road at the right time and will provide guidance in implementing individual treatments successfully, e.g. crack- sealing, rut mitigation. Example topics include timely preventative maintenance of municipal roads; construction and rehabilitation of utility boxes; and progressive improvement of asphalt and concrete pavement repair practices. Decision Making and Investment Environmental Protocols Planning Environmental protocols focus on the interaction Elected officials and senior municipal of natural systems and their effects on human administrators need a framework for articulating quality of life in relation to municipal the value of infrastructure planning and infrastructure delivery. Environmental elements maintenance, while balancing social, and systems include land (including flora), water, environmental and economic factors. Decision- air (including noise and light) and soil. Example making and investment planning best practices practices include how to factor in environmental transform complex and technical material into considerations in establishing the desired level non-technical principles and guidelines for of municipal infrastructure service; and decision making, and facilitate the realization of definition of local environmental conditions, adequate funding over the life cycle of the challenges and opportunities with respect to infrastructure. Examples include protocols for municipal infrastructure. determining costs and benefits associated with desired levels of service; and strategic benchmarks, indicators or reference points for investment policy and planning decisions. Potable Water Transit Potable water best practices address various Urbanization places pressure on an eroding, approaches to enhance a municipality’s or water ageing infrastructure, and raises concerns about utility’s ability to manage drinking water declining air and water quality. Transit systems delivery in a way that ensures public health and contribute to reducing traffic gridlock and safety at best value and on a sustainable basis. improving road safety. Transit best practices Issues such as water accountability, water use address the need to improve supply, influence and loss, deterioration and inspection of demand and make operational improvements distribution systems, renewal planning and with the least environmental impact, while technologies for rehabilitation of potable water meeting social and business needs. systems and water quality in the distribution systems are examined. Storm and Wastewater Ageing buried infrastructure, diminishing financial resources, stricter legislation for effluents, increasing public awareness of environmental impacts due to wastewater and contaminated stormwater are challenges that municipalities have to deal with. Storm and wastewater best practices deal with buried linear infrastructure as well as end of pipe treatment and management issues. Examples include ways to control and reduce inflow and infiltration; how to secure relevant and consistent data sets; how to inspect and assess condition and performance of collections systems; treatment plant optimization; and management of biosolids. 4 Rut Mitigation Techniques at Intersections — September 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 7 4. Application of Rut Mitigation Techniques . 27 Executive Summary. 9 4.1 New and Existing Pavements . .27 1. General . 11 4.2 New Construction and 1.1 Introduction . .11 Reconstruction . .27 1.2 Purpose and Scope . .11 4.2.1 Flexible and Rigid 1.3 Glossary . .11 Pavement Design . .27 1.4 Acronyms . .13 4.2.2 Mitigation of Instability Rutting . .27 1.4.1 Agencies and Associations . .13 4.2.3 Perpetual Pavements . .28 1.4.2 Technical Terms . .14 4.3 Pavement Preservation, Overlays, 1.5 How to Use This Document . .15 and Rehabilitation . .33 2. Rationale . 17 4.3.1 Selection of Rehabilitation Method . .33 2.1 Background . .17 4.3.2 Mill and Overlay with 2.1.1 Concerns with Asphalt Asphalt Concrete . .33 Pavement Rutting . .17 4.3.3 Rut Filling Using Spray 2.1.2 Types of Asphalt Pavement Patching, Thin Overlays, or Rutting . .17 Micro-Surfacing . .34 2.2 Instability Rutting of Asphalt Concrete . .20 4.3.4 Grinding and Precision 2.2.1 Causes at Intersections . .20 Milling . .34 2.2.2 Rutting Types . .20 4.3.5 Whitetopping (Conventional and Concrete Inlay) . .34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Concrete Pavementspavements N a a T T I I O O N N a a L L
    N N a a t t i i o o n n a a Technical Services l l , R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o Vail, Colorado u u t t May 22-25, 2005 Steve Waalkes, P.E. C C o o n n f f e e r r e e Managing Director n n c American Concrete Pavement Association c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 TRB National Roundabouts Conference D D Concrete Roundabouts R R Concrete Roundabouts A A F F T T N N a a Flexible Uses liquid asphalt as binder Pro: usually lower cost Con: requires frequent maintenance & rehabilitation t t i i Asphalt o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C Terminology Terminology o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 D D R R A A Rigid Uses cement as binder Pro: longer lasting Con: higher cost Concrete F F T T N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C o o s n n c f f e i e r r t e e n n e y c c t e h e t 2 2 e 0 0 f s 0 0 aterials onstructability a e conomics 5 erformance (future maintenance) 5 Why Concrete Roundabouts? Why Concrete Roundabouts? D D E C P M R R • • • • •S •A A A F F T T Realize there is a choice N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 What performance characteristics of Where do we typically use concrete pavement? (situations, traffic conditions, applications, etc.) concrete pavement make it the best choice for roundabouts? 5 5 Why Concrete Roundabouts? Why Concrete Roundabouts? D D R R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Highway Sufficiency Ratings
    4 Pavement Data 1 Report New York State Department of Transportation 20 CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................ i Location / Identification ........................................................... ii Physical Characteristics ......................................................... iii Traffic Information .................................................................. v Condition Information ............................................................. v Other Data .............................................................................. ix Glossary ................................................................................. xi Region/County Abbreviations ................................................. xii New York State Parkways by Jurisdiction .............................. xiii Notes for the New York State Thruway .................................. xiv Pavement Data Report ........................................................... 1 This report was prepared by Pavement Data Services, New York State Department of Transportation. Inquiries or requests for information should be directed to: Pavement Data Services, NYSDOT, 50 Wolf Road POD 42, Albany, New York 12232 (518-457-1965). A pdf file of this report is available for download from the Pavement Management page of the Department’s website at www.nysdot.gov. Hard copies of the report are no longer created. 2014 Pavement Data Report for New York State Highways INTRODUCTION The New York State Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Gravel Roads Maintenance & Frontrunner Training Workshop
    A Ditch In Time Gravel Roads Maintenance Workshop 1 So you think you’ve got a wicked driveway 2 1600’ driveway with four switchbacks and 175’ of elevation change (11% grade) 3 Rockhouse Development, Conway 4 5 6 Swift River (left) through National Forest into Saco River that drains the MWV Valley’s developments 7 The best material starts as solid rock that is drilled & blasted… 8 Then crushed into smaller pieces and screened to produce specific size aggregate 9 How strong should it be? One big truck = 10,000 cars! 10 11 The road surface… • Lots of small aggregate (stones) to provide strength with a shape that will lock stones together to support wheels • Sufficient “fines,” the binder that will lock the stones together, to keep the stones from moving around 12 • The stone: hard and uniform in size and more angular than that made just from screening bank run gravel 13 • A proper combination of correctly sized broken rock, sand and silt/clay soil materials will produce a road surface that hardens into a strong and stable crust that forms a reasonably impervious “roof” to our road • An improper balance- a surface that is loose, soft & greasy when wet, or excessively dusty when dry (see samples) 14 One way to judge whether gravel will pack or not… 15 Here’s another way… 16 Or: The VeryFine test The sticky palm test As shown in the Camp Roads manual 17 • “Dirty” gravel packs but does not drain • “Clean” gravel drains but does not pack 18 Other road surfacing materials: • Rotten Rock- traditional surfacing material in the Mt Washington Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Evaluation of Rutting Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Ivan Syed University of New Mexico - Main Campus
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Civil Engineering ETDs Engineering ETDs Fall 11-7-2017 Comprehensive Evaluation of Rutting Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Ivan Syed University of New Mexico - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ce_etds Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Syed, Ivan. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Rutting Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ce_etds/187 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Engineering ETDs at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Civil Engineering ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ivan Anwar Syed Candidate Civil Engineering Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: Dr. Rafiqul A. Tarefder, Chairperson Dr. John C. Stormont Dr. Tang-Tat Ng i COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF RUTTING PERFORMANCE OF ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURES by IVAN ANWAR SYED B.S., CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, 2014 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Civil Engineering The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2017 ii DEDICATIONS This thesis is dedicated to my family, Lenore Syed, Anwar Aziz, & Allen Syed For their endless love, support, and inspiration iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Rafiqul A. Tarefder, my Advisor and MS thesis Committee Chair, for the inestimable guidance, enthusiasm and support throughout the development of this thesis. This study was jointly funded by the New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) and the Southern Plains Transportation Center (SPTC).
    [Show full text]
  • Poston Brick Company Memoir
    University of Illinois at Springfield Norris L Brookens Library Archives/Special Collections Poston Brick Company Memoir P846. Poston Brick Company Interview and memoir 5 tapes, 240 mins., 78 pp. The narrators discuss personnel, machines, operations and types of bricks manufactured at the Poston Brick Company in Springfield. Narrators also discuss working conditions, hazards, co-workers, and the structures located on the factory grounds. Interviews by Garnetta Cook, 1972 OPEN: see individual names for legal release See individual collateral files : interviewer's notes, photos of factory, photocopies of articles about the factory, list of buildings built with the company's bricks, and background notes. Archives/Special Collections LIB 144 University of Illinois at Springfield One University Plaza, MS BRK 140 Springfield IL 62703-5407 © 1972, University of Illinois Board of Trustees ! ' • Poston Brick Company Ivory Carter (23 pages) Estol Cook (11 pages) Mark Cook (14 pages) William E. Poston ( 4 pages) Earl Robinson (10 pages) Henrietta Van Cleve ( 4 'pages) These interviews are part of a project on the Poston Brick Company in Springfield, Illinois. People interviewed include a former employee's wife, former employees, and the president of Poston Brick. They relate their working experiences with regard to making bricks. The interviewer was Garnetta Cook. COPYRIGHT@ 1985 SANGAMON STATE UNIVERSITY, SPRINGFIELD, ILUNOIS. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Oral History Office, Sangamon State University, Springfield, Illinois 62708.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavement Condition Assessment V2.0W
    NYSDOT Network Level Pavement Condition Assessment V2.0w Surface Distress Rating Ride Quality (IRI) Pavement Condition Index IRI Deduct 35 30 IRI >170 in/mi y = 1.08 (9E-06x3 - 0.0075x2 + 2.0532x - 154.37) 25 20 IRI <170 in/mi y = 0.90 (2E-06x3 + 0.0004x2 + 0.0596x - 5.2585) 15 DeductValue 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 IRI (in/mi) New York State Department of Transportation i Network Level Pavement Condition Assessment Preface This document describes the procedures used by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) to assess and quantify network-level pavement condition. There are four general facets of pavement condition: surface distress, ride quality, structural capacity and friction. Because the data collection tools currently available to measure structural capacity and friction are not efficient for network-level data collection, the NYSDOT condition assessment procedures are limited to certain surface distresses and to ride quality. Network-level data for these condition factors is readily available through ongoing data collection programs. Information about pavement condition and performance is critical to the decision making that occurs to successfully manage highway pavements. Accurate and timely data is used to assess system performance and deterioration, identify maintenance and reconstruction needs, and determine financing requirements. The annual assessment and reporting of pavement conditions is required by the New York State Highway Law (§ 2 Section 10). NYSDOT has assessed pavement surface distress information annually on 100% of the state highway system using a visual windshield rating system since 1981. The original paper-based collection procedure was replaced in 2004 with the E-Score electronic recording system.
    [Show full text]
  • RECORD PACKET COPY APPLICANTS: Michael & Kimberly Doyle AGENT: Nancy A
    " STATE OF CALIFORNIA- THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION Appeal Filed: 6/29/20~0 i South Coast Area Office Permit Approved: 11/18/2004 Mtt ·- 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 Staff: CP-LB ·. (562) 590-5071 Staff Report: 3/2/2005 W8b Hearing Date: March 16, 2005 Commission Action: STAFF REPORT: REVISED FINDINGS DE NOVO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPEAL NUMBER: A-5-RDB-04-261 RECORD PACKET COPY APPLICANTS: Michael & Kimberly Doyle AGENT: Nancy A. Lucast APPELLANTS: Robert & Linda Moffat, Jill & Tony Pietrini, Kevin Farr, and Shannon Gyuricza PROJECT LOCATION: 801 Esplanade, City of Redondo Beach, Los Angeles County. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add 23-foot high, 835 square foot second story addition to an existing 13-foot high (above street), 1 ,673 square foot single­ family residence, and remove ficus tree and private development from the adjacent public access easement. Lot Area 3,000 square feet Building Coverage 2,000 square feet Pavement Coverage 500 square feet Landscape Coverage 500 square feet Parking Spaces 2 Zoning R-1 Plan Designation Single Fnmily Residential Building Height 23 feet above street {approved add'n) COMMISSIONERS ON Burke, Kram, Kruer, Neely, Orr, Peters, Potter, Reilly, Wan and PREVAILING SIDE: Chair Caldwell. SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Commission has jurisdiction over the proposed project as the result of an appeal of the City of Redondo Beach approval of Local Coastal Development Permit No. 04-01. On August 12, 2004, the Commission found that a substantial issue existed in regards to the proposed project's effect on the public view from the Knob Hill area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Cadillac Escalade Owner Manual
    Cadillac Escalade/Escalade ESV Owner Manual - 2011 Black plate (1,1) 2011 Cadillac Escalade/Escalade ESV Owner Manual M In Brief . 1-1 Storage . 4-1 Climate Controls . 8-1 Instrument Panel . 1-2 Storage Compartments . 4-1 Climate Control Systems . 8-1 Initial Drive Information . 1-4 Roof Rack System . 4-3 Air Vents . 8-8 Vehicle Features . 1-16 Performance and Instruments and Controls . 5-1 Driving and Operating . 9-1 Maintenance . 1-21 Controls . 5-2 Driving Information . 9-2 Warning Lights, Gauges, and Starting and Operating . 9-30 Keys, Doors and Windows . 2-1 Indicators . 5-11 Engine Exhaust . 9-38 Keys and Locks . 2-2 Information Displays . 5-26 Automatic Transmission . 9-40 Doors . 2-9 Vehicle Messages . 5-31 Drive Systems . 9-45 Vehicle Security. 2-13 Vehicle Personalization . 5-40 Brakes . 9-45 Exterior Mirrors . 2-16 Universal Remote System . 5-50 Ride Control Systems . 9-47 Interior Mirrors . 2-18 Cruise Control . 9-51 Windows . 2-19 Lighting . 6-1 Object Detection Systems . 9-54 Roof . 2-22 Exterior Lighting . 6-1 Fuel . 9-63 Interior Lighting . 6-10 Towing. 9-70 Seats and Restraints . 3-1 Lighting Features . 6-11 Conversions and Add-Ons . 9-82 Head Restraints . 3-2 Front Seats . 3-3 Infotainment System . 7-1 Vehicle Care . 10-1 Rear Seats . 3-9 Introduction . 7-2 General Information . 10-2 Safety Belts . 3-18 Radio . 7-10 Vehicle Checks . 10-4 Airbag System . 3-35 Audio Players . 7-19 Headlamp Aiming . 10-34 Child Restraints . 3-51 Rear Seat Infotainment .
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Road Maintenance Manual
    GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENANCE MANUAL A Guide for Landowners on Camp and Other Gravel Roads Kennebec County Maine Department of Soil and Water Environmental Protection Bureaus of Land Conservation District Resources and Water Quality April 2016 For the purposes of this manual, the terms “gravel road” and “camp road” are used interchangeably and are used to describe private and public roads that are typically narrow and unpaved. - TABLE OF CONTENTS - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I INTRODUCTION 1 A Little History on Camp Roads 1 Some Questions and Answers 3 TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE 7 Road Surface Problems 7 Culvert Problems 9 Ditch Problems 10 UNDERSTANDING THE BASICS 11 Soil Erosion 11 Factors Linked to Erosion 12 Water and Your Road 13 Surface Water 14 Groundwater 14 Erosion Control Principles 15 Work with Nature 17 Where to Drain to: Vegetated Buffers 17 Types of Buffers 18 How to Have an Effective Buffer 18 Buffers: Cost-Effective, Low Maintenance, and Good for the Lake 19 CAMP ROAD MAINTENANCE 20 Road Surface 20 Road Level 20 Road Materials 21 Road Material Composition 22 Alternative Road Surfacing Materials 24 Geotextiles as Road Base 24 Reclaimed Pavement/Recycled Asphalt (Reclaim) 26 Pavement 27 Other Alternative Surface Materials 27 Grading 28 Crowning and Super-Elevating 30 Alternative Equipment 33 Steel Tine Rake 33 Frontrunner Device 34 Dust Control 35 Winter Maintenance 37 Road Drainage 39 Ditches 39 Ditch Shape 40 Ditch Size and Depth 42 Ditch Erosion and Stabilization 43 Erosion in Ditches 43 Seeding and Mulching 44 Erosion Control Mix 46 Erosion
    [Show full text]
  • Gravel Roads Construction and Maintenance Guide Table of Contents Subject Page
    Errata ­ Replaces page 137 Reconstruction Using a Detour When the reconstruction and resulting berm are significant, the work space takes all or most of the road surface, leaving no room for traffic to negotiate past the work activities. An agency may need to reconstruct the unpaved roadway by correcting the drainage and/or adding surface materials. With this type of work, additional equipment may be used and a large amount of material may create a large berm (12 inches or more across). This will present significant hazards for the traveling public. To improve safety for mo­ torists and workers, a detour may be the best TTC. Not all road users will be familiar with the local road system and some may be confused by the road closure, so signing should be used to assist users negotiating the detour. Reconstruction work space. (Source: Greg Vavra, SDLTAP). Notes: 1. Not all local agencies use route makers for their system. MUTCD Section 6F.59 states “A Street Name sign should be placed above, or the street name should be incorporated into, a DETOUR (M4­9) sign to indicate the name of the street being detoured.” 2. With an increase in traffic at the intersections where the detour begins and ends, a review of the usage of the STOP and YIELD signs should be completed. 3. Flashing warning lights and/or flags may be used to call attention to advance warning signs. 4. Flashing warning lights may be used on the Type 3 Barricades, which should be installed at the point where the road is closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Concrete Roundabouts Rigid Pavement Well-Suited for Increasingly Popular Intersection Type
    Concrete Roundabouts Rigid Pavement Well-Suited for Increasingly Popular Intersection Type In certain areas of the United States, traffic engi- Design neers are recognizing the benefits of using round- abouts instead of traditional signalized intersec- The two primary design aspects for any intersection tions. These benefits include reduced accident construction project and for roundabouts in particu- rates, reduced delay time, and lower speeds, to lar, are pavement thickness design and jointing name a few. system design. Today’s roundabouts are different than traffic In most pavement thickness design procedures, circles. When designed and striped correctly, designing the pavement structure requires, at roundabouts offer better traffic flow and safety minimum, determining the following factors: characteristics than most other intersection types. The vehicles on the entering roadways must yield to 1. Concrete Properties – Flexural strength or traffic in the circulating roadway. This ensures that modulus of rupture, MR; and modulus of there is no gridlock in the roundabout. elasticity, E. 2. Support Conditions – Strength of the sub- Why Concrete for Roundabouts grade, or subgrade-subbase combination (modulus of subgrade reaction, k). The roundabout designer has a choice of pavement 3. Desired Life – Design period, which is typi- type for roundabouts; concrete or asphalt. Concrete cally 20 years, but may range from less roundabouts are long-lasting and easy to maintain, than 5 to more than 50 years. because concrete does not push, shove, or rut 4. Expected Traffic – The weights, frequen- under the turning motion of heavy vehicles around cies, and types of truck axle loads that the the intersection. Concrete provides a long-term fix, pavement will carry during the design pe- and is well-suited to areas where future disruption to traffic must be kept to a minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Principles of Dynamic Pricing in Transportation
    The four principles of dynamic pricing in transportation How to adjust tolls and parking rates for faster, more efficient roadways The four principles of dynamic pricing in transportation 30% of cars in congested downtown traffic are Get a grip on your looking for parking traffic flows Traffic planners and transport As the morning progresses, many of those cars Dynamic pricing can help. The idea is simple: decision-makers are stuck in a rut. will be clogging city roads looking for a place to by adjusting toll and parking rates to demand, park. An average across several studies suggests traffic planners gain a powerful tool for managing The same situation repeats itself daily: at rush that 30% or more of drivers in congested traffic flows. Many cities have proven it. Thinking hour, an overwhelming number of cars will downtown traffic are looking for parking. about pricing in a new way can: inevitably clog toll roads, free- and expressways. Every day, this stop-and-go causes frustration, For transportation authorities in particular, these • Increase car occupancy congestion, stress, and pollution, as well as realities translate into many challenges – not • Promote alternatives to driving dangerous conditions for vulnerable road users enough space for additional infrastructure and • Maximize your existing infrastructure such as bicyclists and pedestrians. limited funding among them. And even if funds • Encourage drivers to travel outside peak times are there, a growing consensus is that more – • Guide drivers to more available spaces more roads, more lanes, more parking • Make journeys more predictable – doesn’t necessarily solve the problem. • Reduce emissions Yet, the truth is, planning organizations and elected officials have the ability to change people’s behavior.
    [Show full text]