Ex-Minister Unloads on Rudd Govt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ex-Minister Unloads on Rudd Govt Ex-minister unloads on Rudd govt SAMANTHA MAIDEN From: The Sunday Telegraph April 24, 2011 12:00AM ONE of the Labor Government's "gang of four" key ministers has taken a swipe at his former colleagues and reveals that one of Kevin Rudd's grand election promises - a powerful business advisory panel - was pure fantasy that never existed. In the first memoir written by a Rudd government insider, former finance minister Lindsay Tanner also describes Ms Gillard's "moving forward" election slogan as setting "new records for banality". Mr Tanner, who quit politics on the same day that Julia Gillard became Prime Minister, said the 2010 election campaign was the "worst in living memory", with "banal slogans, robotic delivery, and trivial policy announcement deployed by both the major parties". He also says Ms Gillard has dyed her hair red for years to help build her personal brand. "It makes her more noticeable. She has registered as an individual personality in the sideshow." Delivering a damning assessment of politics, Mr Tanner largely blames the media in a new book, Sideshow, for descending into "info-tainment" rather than serious policy analysis. Mr Tanner, who was one of the "gang of four" ministers who ran Labor's policy agenda, also writes that the media failed to twig that the government did nothing for two-and-a-half years to deliver on a key economic pledge by Mr Rudd in 2008 to boost national savings. In 2007, when Mr Rudd announced the business advisory panel headed by the respected Sir Rod Eddington, The Australian "splashed the story on its front page, complete with a big photo of a smiling Rudd and shadow treasurer Wayne Swan"."Did anything actually happen?" Mr Tanner writes. The truth, he explains, was that "Kevin Rudd may have announced the creation of the advisory panel but ultimately it was never established". "In spite of occasional cursory inquiries from journalists about when the names of its members would be announced, no one ever worked out that it was a chimera. A potentially highly embarrassing story was never written," Mr Tanner said. The Sunday Telegraph did not obtain an embargoed copy of the book, released this week, but was briefed on key extracts, and understands Mr Tanner: DENIES he was the source of damaging cabinet leaks that derailed the ALP's election campaign after it was claimed that Ms Gillard opposed an aged pension increase, accusing the media of "collective psychosis" after he refused to rule himself in or out as the culprit. ATTACKS Ms Gillard's 2010 election slogan of Moving Forward as a clich aac that would have irritated anyone who had spent time with second tier business executives. REVEALS the ABC edited out of a Lateline interview a stumble when he was asked by Leigh Sales to describe Mr Rudd in one word and replied, "Nasty." Mr Tanner quips his gaffe was edited out because he thought he was talking about John Howard.. His book is believed to pull its punches on the ETS debate, following Mr Rudd's claims that Ms Gillard and Treasurer Wayne Swan were in favour of dumping it while Mr Tanner and Senator Penny Wong were against. .
Recommended publications
  • Budget Estimates 2011-12
    Senate Standing Committee on Economics ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Innovation, Industry, Science and Research Portfolio Budget Estimates Hearing 2011-12 30 May 2011 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT: INNOVATION, INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND RESEARCH TOPIC: PMSEIC REFERENCE: Written Question – Senator Colbeck QUESTION No.: BI-132 Senator COLBECK: Is a list of attendees documented for each of the PMSEIC meetings? If so, could these lists be provided for each of the meetings of 23 April 2008, 9 October 2008, 5 June 2009, 18 March 2010 and 4 February 2011? Alternatively, could you please provide a full breakdown of which Departmental secretaries have attended each of these meetings respectively? ANSWER Yes, full lists of attendees are documented for each of the PMSEIC meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry Mccrann: Which Is It Labor … Are We in Recession Or Can We Afford Higher Power Prices? Terry Mccrann, Herald Sun, March 11, 2019 8:00Pm Subscriber Only
    Terry McCrann: Which is it Labor … are we in recession or can we afford higher power prices? Terry McCrann, Herald Sun, March 11, 2019 8:00pm Subscriber only Labor’s top duo Bill Shorten and Chris Bowen want to have it both ways. On the one hand, they say the economy is in deep trouble — indeed, that it has actually already slid into recession, according to Bowen, in “per capita” (per person) terms. MORE MCCRANN: WHY BOWEN’S RECESSION CALL IS RUBBISH JAMES CAMPBELL: SCOMO IS ROLLING THE DICE ON BOATS Yet on the other, that households — and even more, small and medium-sized businesses — who are already paying cripplingly high gas and electricity prices, are actually in such great financial shape that they can happily pay higher and higher prices yet. And further, that an incoming Labor government can hit investors with over $200 billion of new taxes and the economy will just keep riding smoothly on. Shadow treasurer Chris Bowen says Australia is already in a “per capita” recession. At least they can’t be accused of hiding any of this. The disastrous economic managers they promise to be — especially Bowen who is on the record as thinking Wayne Swan was one of Australia’s greatest treasurers — is ‘hiding’ not just in plain sight, but in right-in-your face sight. The so-called “per capita recession” that Bowen came out with last week was just rubbish. Yes, the economy slowed in the second half of last year. In the first half, GDP — the measure of Australia’s economic output — was growing at close to a 4 per cent annual rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Australian Political Opinion Results from the Australian Election Study 1987– 2019
    Trends in Australian Political Opinion Results from the Australian Election Study 1987– 2019 Sarah Cameron & Ian McAllister School of Politics & International Relations ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences australianelectionstudy.org Trends in Australian Political Opinion Results from the Australian Election Study 1987– 2019 Sarah Cameron Ian McAllister December, 2019 Sarah Cameron School of Social and Political Sciences The University of Sydney E [email protected] Ian McAllister School of Politics and International Relations The Australian National University E [email protected] Contents Introduction 5 The election campaign 7 Voting and partisanship 17 Election issues 31 The economy 51 Politics and political parties 71 The left-right dimension 81 The political leaders 85 Democracy and institutions 97 Trade unions, business and wealth 107 Social issues 115 Defence and foreign affairs 129 References 143 Appendix: Methodology 147 Introduction The Liberal-National Coalition The results also highlight how In 2019 two further surveys are win in the 2019 Australian federal voter attitudes contributed available to complement the election came as a surprise to the to the election result. Factors AES. The first is Module 5 of the nation. The media and the polls advantaging the Coalition in the Comparative Study of Electoral australianelectionstudy.org had provided a consistent narrative 2019 election include: the focus Systems project (www.cses. in the lead up to election day that on economic issues (p. 32), an org). This survey used the Social > Access complete data files and Labor was headed for victory. area in which the Coalition has Research Centre’s ‘Life in Australia’ documentation to conduct your When we have unexpected election a strong advantage over Labor panel and was fielded just after the own analysis results, how do we make sense of (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor's Debt Timebomb
    Labor’s debt timebomb A BANK is very happy to lend you money when you don't need it. It's only when you get into trouble that the bank makes it hard to get a loan. Before 2008 there was no limit on the amount the federal government could borrow. There was no need. The government wasn't borrowing. It was in the business of repaying its debts. It was the government of Kevin Rudd and Wayne Swan that introduced the debt limit, initially $75 billion. They explained that they did not want to spend all this money, that it was just to help financial traders who wanted to be able to trade more Commonwealth bonds. When he moved the legislation in the House of Representatives, the ever-so-serious Chris Bowen (then the assistant treasurer and now the shadow treasurer) assured the public: "The government's commitment to strong fiscal discipline means that there is no need to issue debt securities to finance spending." Back then no one could imagine the government would actually spend a loan of $75 billion. Until it did. So in 2009, Labor increased the debt ceiling to $200 billion - just to be sure it could borrow enough money to cover all its spending proposals. It spent its way up to that. So in 2011 it raised the limit to $250 billion. Last year it was increased further to $300 billion and pretty soon - possibly in a few days - the government will spend its way up to that limit as well. So the argument is whether the debt ceiling should go to $400 billion as Bowen says, or $500 billion as Hockey says, or to no limit as the Greens say.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010
    The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 Edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/rudd_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Rudd government : Australian Commonwealth administration 2007 - 2010 / edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans. ISBN: 9781921862069 (pbk.) 9781921862076 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Rudd, Kevin, 1957---Political and social views. Australian Labor Party. Public administration--Australia. Australia--Politics and government--2001- Other Authors/Contributors: Aulich, Chris, 1947- Evans, Mark Dr. Dewey Number: 324.29407 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by ANU E Press Illustrations by David Pope, The Canberra Times Printed by Griffin Press Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Contributors . ix Part I. Introduction 1 . It was the best of times; it was the worst of times . 3 Chris Aulich 2 . Issues and agendas for the term . 17 John Wanna Part II. The Institutions of Government 3 . The Australian Public Service: new agendas and reform . 35 John Halligan 4 . Continuity and change in the outer public sector .
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download the Stalking of Julia Gillard: How the Media and Team
    THE STALKING OF JULIA GILLARD: HOW THE MEDIA AND TEAM RUDD BROUGHT DOWN THE PRIME MINISTER PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kerry-Anne Walsh | 320 pages | 15 Feb 2014 | Allen & Unwin | 9781742379227 | English | Sydney, Australia The Stalking of Julia Gillard: How the Media and Team Rudd Brought Down the Prime Minister PDF Book July 11, at pm. It reminds one that journalists have often been compared to used car salesmen, the sale is the important thing not the truth. On this point Walsh remarks: One wonders if their bile and venom would be directed at a man; the disrespect they show Gillard and the office of prime minister is unprecedented. Disastrous because the book is just as quickly out of date as soon as it arrives on shelves. I've also heard good things about "Downfall". Does Walshe hold out her book as the definitive work or did she make and break a pact with MH that she would write a book to suit his wants on this? And the Daily Telegraph and The Age have never been the bastions of truth - ummm der! Given the negotiation that would have had to happen to get any legislation passed, this can only be seen as successful and a testament to their ability to negotiate with independents and other members of parliament. Leaks, rumours, polls and deniability: Kerry-Anne Walsh paints an ugly picture of Kevin Rudds road back to the prime ministership. It is about a politician who was never given a fair go; not in the media, not by Rudd, not by some in caucus.
    [Show full text]
  • Kevin Rudd: a Professional Profile 59 the Queensland Office of the Cabinet 61 the Council of Australian Governments 69 Conclusion 77
    The Entrepreneurial Bureaucrat A Study of Policy Entrepreneurship in the Formation of a National Strategy to Create an Asia-Literate Australia Christopher fames Mackenzie Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by research in Victoria University of Technology August 2001 .. 11 Contents .. Contents 11 . Declarations V1 .. Acknowledgements V11 Abstract Vlll . Abbreviations lX Introduction Policy Entrepreneurship and the NALSAS Strategy 1 Context of the Study 5 Microeconomic, Public Sector and Intergovernmental Reform in Australia 5 Engagement with Asia and the Significance of Asian Studies 8 Significance of the Study 10 Research Methodology 12 The Case Study 12 Interview Data and Documentary Evidence 13 Data Analysis 19 Summary of Methodology 21 Preview of the Organisation of the Study 21 Chapter One: Entrepreneurship in Policy Making: Theoretical Perspectives Introduction 24 Policy Entrepreneurs 27 Placing the Entrepreneur in a Theoretical Framework 32 Theories of Policy Entrepreneurship 39 Conclusion 52 Chapter Two: The Entrepreneur: Location and Context Introduction 57 111 Kevin Rudd: A Professional Profile 59 The Queensland Office of the Cabinet 61 The Council of Australian Governments 69 Conclusion 77 Chapter Three: The Development of Asian Studies in Australian Schools Introduction 78 Making Education Policy in Australia 79 The Teaching of Asian Languages in Australia 81 The Auchmuty Report 83 The Asian Studies Association of Australia (ASAA) 86 The National Policy on Languages 91 The Asian
    [Show full text]
  • 27 Gillard Web July 2013
    27 Julia Eileen GILLARD Prime Minister 24 June 2010 – 27 June 2013 • Julia Gillard became the 27th Prime Minister after she was elected unopposed in a ballot for the leadership of the Australian Labor Party. • Member of the Australian Labor Party. • Member of the House of Representatives for Lalor (Vic) 1998-, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, Minister for Education and Minister for Social Inclusion 2007-2010. Main achievements (2010-13) • The first woman to become Prime Minister, and the first woman to be Deputy Prime Minister. • Introduced the Clean Energy Bill 2011, a package of legislation establishing an emissions trading scheme to reduce Australia’s carbon emissions. • Introduced the National Disability Insurance Scheme, DisabilityCare Australia • Introduced legislation to reform the education system following the Gonski review, including funding to primary and secondary education. Personal life • Born 29 September 1961 in Barry, Glamorgan, Wales. Father John was a coal miner. • As a child suffered respiratory problems. Emigrated with her family to Adelaide in 1966 as ’£10 poms’ as a warmer climate was more suited to her health. • Attended Unley High School, University of Adelaide and University of Melbourne, graduating with arts and law degrees in 1986. • President of the Australian Union of Students 1983-1984 • Joined law firm Slater and Gordon in 1987. • Chief of Staff to Victorian ALP leader (later Premier) John Brumby 1996-1998 • Partner (since 2006) is Tim Mathieson. Character ‘Julia Gillard answers questions readily, laughs easily and has a nice line in self-deprecation...she is easy to talk to, hiding any natural wariness behind a smiling and relaxed manner.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 ALP National Platform
    Welcome to Labor’s 2021 National Platform In March 2021, delegates to the Australian Labor Party’s Special Platform Conference gathered to debate and adopt our National Platform. Our online Special Platform Conference was an event like nothing Labor – or any other Australian political party – had attempted before. Over two days, delegates, branch members and observers joined from home, from work and from community spaces in every corner of the country. The coronavirus pandemic may have prevented our movement from coming together as we traditionally have, but it did not prevent Labor from updating and renewing our National Platform. As Anthony Albanese notes in the foreword to the National Platform, Labor’s historic task is to advance an agenda of fairness that creates a better society, a better nation and a better world. The 2021 National Platform sets out the contemporary policy agenda that an Albanese Labor Government will implement to progress that great task. It is the product of countless hours of debate, discussion, and deliberation by Labor members in the 18 months leading up to the Special Platform Conference. I want to particularly acknowledge the work of the National Policy Forum, particularly the Forum’s office bearers led by our National President, Wayne Swan; Senators Jenny McAllister and Deborah O’Neill; and our NPF Secretary, Misha Zelinsky. I commend the 2021 National Platform to the Party and the people of Australia. Paul Erickson ALP National Secretary Conference resolution relating to the ALP National Platform That
    [Show full text]
  • April 2004 Monthly Report
    EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO AUSTRALIA Canberra, 8 August 2012 BS/bs 12.201 – 01.05 MONTHLY REPORT ON AUSTRALIA July 2012 Table of Contents 1. POLITICAL SITUATION.......................................................................................2 2. INTERNATIONAL ISSUES ...................................................................................3 Defence and Security...............................................................................................4 The Pacific...............................................................................................................5 Development and Aid ..............................................................................................5 EU-Australia relations .............................................................................................5 3. SECTORAL ISSUES ..............................................................................................6 Trade and Investment...............................................................................................6 Economic and Financial Affairs...............................................................................6 Regulatory Issues.....................................................................................................8 Agriculture and Fisheries .........................................................................................8 Environment ............................................................................................................8 Transport and Infrastructure.....................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Version
    ACCEPTED VERSION Carol Johnson The Australian Right in the “Asian Century”: Inequality and the Implications for Social Democracy Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2018; 48(4):1-27 © 2018 Journal of Contemporary Asia This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Contemporary Asia 06 Mar 2018 available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1441894 PERMISSIONS http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/sharing-your-work/ Accepted Manuscript (AM) As a Taylor & Francis author, you can post your Accepted Manuscript (AM) on your personal website at any point after publication of your article (this includes posting to Facebook, Google groups, and LinkedIn, and linking from Twitter). To encourage citation of your work we recommend that you insert a link from your posted AM to the published article on Taylor & Francis Online with the following text: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI].” For example: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Africa Review on 17/04/2014, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/12345678.1234.123456. N.B. Using a real DOI will form a link to the Version of Record on Taylor & Francis Online. The AM is defined by the National Information Standards Organization as: “The version of a journal article that has been accepted for publication in a journal.” This means the version that has been through peer review and been accepted by a journal editor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minerals Resource Rent Tax: the Australian Labor Party and the Continuity of Change
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2014 The minerals resource rent tax: the Australian Labor Party and the continuity of change John Passant University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Passant, John, "The minerals resource rent tax: the Australian Labor Party and the continuity of change" (2014). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 1772. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/1772 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The minerals resource rent tax: the Australian Labor Party and the continuity of change Abstract Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to look at the recent history of proposals to tax resource rents in Australia, from Australia's Future Tax System Report (the "Henry Tax Review") through to the proposed Resource Super Profits axT ("RSPT") and then the Minerals Resource Rent Tax ("MRRT"). The process of change from Henry to the RSPT to the MRRT can best be understood in the context of the Australian Labor Party (ALP) as a capitalist workers' party. The author argues that it is this tension in the ALP, the shift in its internal balance further towards capital and the lack of class struggle, that has seen Labor preside over what the father of rent tax in Australia, Ross Garnaut, describes as a "problematic" tax.
    [Show full text]