DOCSLIB.ORG

Nmfs Arbo Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nmfs Arbo Ii UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Northwest Region 7600 Sand Point Way N.E., Bldg. 1 Seattle, WA 98115 Refer to NMFS Nos.: NWP-2013-9664 April 25, 2013 Kent Connaughton, Regional Forester Jerome E. Perez, State Director Pacific Northwest Region 6 Oregon/Washington USDA Forest Service USDI Bureau of Land Management 333 SW First Avenue 333 SW First Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204-3440 Portland, Oregon 97204 Stanley Speaks, Regional Director Northwest Region Bureau of Indian Affairs 911 NE 11th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232-4169 Re: Reinitiation of the Endangered Species Act Section 7 Formal Programmatic Conference and Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for Aquatic Restoration Activities in the States of Oregon and Washington (ARBO II). Dear Mr. Connaughton, Mr. Perez, and Mr. Speaks: This document contains a programmatic conference and biological opinion (opinion) on reinitiation of consultation on the effects of the U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) (acting for the Coquille Indian Tribe) funding or carrying out aquatic restoration actions in the States of Oregon and Washington.1 Actions covered in this opinion are modified from those analyzed in the biological opinion, issued on April 28, 2007, as summarized in the consultation history section of the opinion. 1 The authority for restoring lands administered by the USFS, BLM and BIA derives from many laws enacted by Congress and Presidential executive orders (E.O.s) whose objectives include reestablishment and retention of ecological resilience on those lands to achieve sustainable management and provide a broad range of ecosystem services. Those statutes and E.Os include the Organic Administration Act, Weeks Law, Knutson-Vandenberg Act, Anderson-Mansfield Reforestation and Revegetation Joint Resolution Act, Granger-Thye Act, Surface Resources Act, Sikes Act, Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act, Wilderness Act, Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act, National Forest Management Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, North American Wetland Conservation Act, Healthy Forests Restoration Act, Stewardship End Result Contracting Projects Guidance (i.e., Omnibus Appropriations Bill of 2003, section 323), Tribal Forest Protection Act, Wyden Amendment, E.O. 11514 as amended by E.O. 11991 (Protection and enhancement of environmental quality); E.O. 11644 (Use of off-road vehicles on the public lands, amended by E.O. 11989 and E.O. 12608), E.O. 11988 Floodplain management), E.O. 11990 (Protection of wetlands); and E.O. 13112 (Invasive Species). -2- During this consultation, NMFS concluded that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect southern DPS green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris) or Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus), or their designated critical habitat, or southern resident killer whales (Orcinus orca), which does not have designated critical habitat within the action area. NMFS also concluded that proposed program is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the following fish species listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA, or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their proposed or designated critical habitats: 1. Lower Columbia River (LCR) Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) 2. Upper Willamette River (UWR) spring-run Chinook salmon 3. Upper Columbia River (UCR) spring-run Chinook salmon 4. Snake River (SR) spring/summer-run Chinook salmon 5. SR fall-run Chinook salmon 6. Puget Sound (PS) Chinook salmon 7. Columbia River (CR) chum salmon (O. keta) 8. Hood Canal chum salmon 9. LCR coho salmon (O. kisutch) 10. Oregon Coast (OC) coho salmon 11. Southern Oregon/Northern California Coasts (SONCC) coho salmon 12. Lake Ozette sockeye salmon (O. nerka) 13. SR sockeye salmon 14. LCR steelhead (O. mykiss) 15. UWR steelhead, 16. Middle Columbia River (MCR) steelhead 17. UCR steelhead 18. Snake River Basin (SRB) steelhead 19. PS steelhead 20. Southern distinct population segment eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus) As required by section 7 of the ESA, NMFS is providing an incidental take statement (ITS) with the opinion. The ITS describes reasonable and prudent measures NMFS considers necessary or appropriate to minimize the impact of incidental take associated with this program. The ITS also sets forth nondiscretionary terms and conditions, including reporting requirements, that the Federal action agency must comply with to carry out the reasonable and prudent measures. Incidental take from actions that meet these terms and conditions will be exempt from the ESA’s prohibition against the take of the listed species considered in this opinion, except eulachon because NMFS has not yet promulgated an ESA section 4(d) rule prohibiting take of threatened eulachon. However, anticipating that such a rule is likely to be issued in the future, we have included terms and conditions to minimize take of eulachon. These terms and conditions are identical to the terms and conditions required to minimize take of listed salmon and steelhead. Therefore, we expect the action agencies would follow these terms and conditions regardless of whether take of eulachon is prohibited. The take exemption for eulachon will take effect on the effective date of any future 4(d) rule prohibiting take of eulachon. The proposed action addressed in this consultation includes projects that will replace or relocate an existing irrigation diversion structure, or modify an existing irrigation diversion structure so -3- that it will meet NMFS’s fish screen criteria. However, the proposed action does not include the issuance of any easement, permit, or right-of-way that would authorize construction of a new diversion structure, or conveyance of water across Federal land. Those types of action require an individual consultation under section 7 of the ESA whenever they may affect an ESA-listed species or designated critical habitat. Moreover, any take that may be due to the use of an existing irrigation diversion structure to withdraw water, or to the use of a water system to convey water across Federal land, is not incidental to the proposed action, and is not exempted from the ESA’s prohibition against take by the ITS of this document. This document also includes the results of our analysis of the action’s likely effects on essential fish habitat (EFH) pursuant to section 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), and includes three conservation recommendations to avoid, minimize, or otherwise offset potential adverse effects on EFH. Section 305(b)(4)(B) of the MSA requires Federal agencies to provide a detailed written response to NMFS within 30 days after receiving these recommendations. If the response is inconsistent with the EFH conservation recommendation, the Forest Service, BLM, or BIA must explain why the recommendations will not be followed, including the scientific justification for any disagreements over the effects of the action and the recommendations. In response to increased oversight of overall EFH program effectiveness by the Office of Management and Budget, NMFS established a quarterly reporting requirement to determine how many conservation recommendations are provided as part of each EFH consultation and how many are adopted by the action agency. Therefore, in your statutory reply to the EFH portion of this consultation, we ask that you clearly identify the number of conservation recommendations accepted. If you have questions regarding this consultation, please contact Kenneth Phippen, OSHO Branch Chief, in the Roseburg Oregon State Habitat Office, at 541.957-3385. Sincerely, William W. Stelle, Jr. Regional Administrator cc: Pauly Bridges, USFWS Paul Henson, USFWS Scott Lightcap, BLM Scott Peets, Forest Service, Michael Pond, BIA Endangered Species Act – Section 7 Programmatic Consultation Conference and Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for Reinitiation of Aquatic Restoration Activities in States of Oregon and Washington (ARBO II) NMFS Consultation Number: NWR-2013-9664 Federal Action Agencies: USDA Forest Service USDI Bureau of Land Management USDI Bureau of Indian Affairs Affected Species and Determinations: Is the action Is the Is the action likely to Action likely to destroy adversely ESA likely to or adversely ESA-Listed Species affect this Status jeopardize modify critical species or this habitat for this its critical species? species? habitat? Lower Columbia River Chinook salmon T Yes No No Upper Willamette River spring-run Chinook salmon T Yes No No Upper Columbia River spring-run Chinook salmon E Yes No No Snake River spring/summer-run Chinook salmon T Yes No No Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon T Yes No No Puget Sound Chinook salmon T Yes No No Columbia River chum salmon T Yes No No Hood Canal summer-run chum salmon T Yes No No Lower Columbia River coho salmon T Yes No No* Oregon Coast coho salmon T Yes No No Southern Oregon/Northern California Coasts coho salmon T Yes No No Lake Ozette sockeye salmon T Yes No No Snake River sockeye salmon E Yes No No LCR steelhead T Yes No No UWR steelhead T Yes No No Middle Columbia River steelhead T Yes No No Upper Columbia River steelhead T Yes No No Snake River Basin steelhead T Yes No No Puget Sound steelhead T Yes No No* Southern green sturgeon T No No NA Eulachon T Yes No No Southern resident killer whale T No No NA Steller sea lion T No No NA *Critical habitat has been proposed for LCR coho salmon and PS steelhead. Fishery Management Plan that Describes EFH Would the action adversely Are EFH conservation in the Action Area affect EFH? recommendations provided? Coastal Pelagic Species Yes Yes Pacific Coast Groundfish Yes Yes Pacific Coast Salmon Yes Yes Consultation Conducted By: National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Region Issued by: ________________ William W.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lost in Coos
    LOST IN COOS “Heroic Deeds and Thilling Adventures” of Searches and Rescues on Coos River Coos County, Oregon 1871 to 2000 by Lionel Youst Golden Falls Publishing LOST IN COOS Other books by Lionel Youst Above the Falls, 1992 She’s Tricky Like Coyote, 1997 with William R. Seaburg, Coquelle Thompson, Athabaskan Witness, 2002 She’s Tricky Like Coyote, (paper) 2002 Above the Falls, revised second edition, 2003 Sawdust in the Western Woods, 2009 Cover photo, Army C-46D aircraft crashed near Pheasant Creek, Douglas County – above the Golden and Silver Falls, Coos County, November 26, 1945. Photo furnished by Alice Allen. Colorized at South Coast Printing, Coos Bay. Full story in Chapter 4, pp 35-57. Quoted phrase in the subtitle is from the subtitle of Pioneer History of Coos and Curry Counties, by Orville Dodge (Salem, OR: Capital Printing Co., 1898). LOST IN COOS “Heroic Deeds and Thrilling Adventures” of Searches and Rescues on Coos River, Coos County, Oregon 1871 to 2000 by Lionel Youst Including material by Ondine Eaton, Sharren Dalke, and Simon Bolivar Cathcart Golden Falls Publishing Allegany, Oregon Golden Falls Publishing, Allegany, Oregon © 2011 by Lionel Youst 2nd impression Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-9726226-3-2 (pbk) Frontier and Pioneer Life – Oregon – Coos County – Douglas County Wilderness Survival, case studies Library of Congress cataloging data HV6762 Dewey Decimal cataloging data 363 Youst, Lionel D., 1934 - Lost in Coos Includes index, maps, bibliography, & photographs To contact the publisher Printed at Portland State Bookstore’s Lionel Youst Odin Ink 12445 Hwy 241 1715 SW 5th Ave Coos Bay, OR 97420 Portland, OR 97201 www.youst.com for copies: [email protected] (503) 226-2631 ext 230 To Desmond and Everett How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami Inundation Map for Coos
    G E O L O G Y F A N O D STATE OF OREGON T Tsunami Inundation Map Coos-05 N M I E N DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES M E T R R A Tsunami Inundation Maps for Coos Bay - North Bend, A www. OregonGeology.org L Local Source (Cascadia Subduction Zone) Tsunami Inundation Map P I E Coos County, Oregon N D D Larry Givens, Governing Board Chair U N S O T Vicki S. McConnell, Director and State Geologist G R E Plate 1 I R E S O Don WT. Lewis, Assistant Director Coos Bay - North Bend, Oregon Rachel R. Lyles Smith, Project Operations Manager 2012 1937 Ian P. Madin, Chief Scientist 124°20'0"W 124°18'0"W 124°16'0"W 124°14'0"W 124°12'0"W L N TRANS-PACIFIC LN I C I F C A R O B I N R D - P 43°26'0"N S N D A R R T E V O C N N N L A D D OV E R W O J 100 S W A L L O W R D E A ! S T B A Y R D North Bay RFPD M Jordan A L L A R D L N Cove 43°26'0"N ¤£101 R O S E M T N L N 100 C o o 25 City of North Bend "7 s E . C . R D B "5 M C C L U R G L N 200 a 100 y 25 EAST BAY RD y L N E E City of North Bend S a R U O B C City of Coos Bay G O L F D s F E R R Y R o ¤£101 E V C A A o City of Coos Bay R L S O R R N P 25 H O R T S I S 100 M C N L I N A R I O North W R Pony E S P V E E A O Bend A I R R ! L P 100 T Fire N O Slough W R SHERMAN AVE T W E I L A V N Y Y A B 200 L O O P C O L O R A D O A V E O O D City of North Bend A R B AY S T O M L A O P C L E L E A F F S T F L O R I D A A V E M A P L E S T H AY E S S T A R T H U R S T J O H N S O N S T M O N TA N A A V E D C O N N E C T I C U T A V E T R S ¤£101 L L W E D A X A M E MCPHERSON AVE H U N I O N A V E L
    [Show full text]
  • Coos Bay BCS Number: 47-8
    Coos Bay BCS number: 47-8 ***NOTE: The completion of this site description is still in progress by our Primary Contact (listed below). However, if you would like to contribute additional information to this description, please contact the Klamath Bird Observatory at [email protected]. Site description author(s) Jennifer Powers Danielle Morris, Research and Monitoring Team, Klamath Bird Observatory Primary contact for this site Mike Graybill, South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Manager. Telephone: 541-888-5558 ext. 24, e-mail: [email protected]. Site location (UTM) Datum: NAD83, Zone: 10, Easting: 394143, Northing: 4802686 General description The Coos Bay estuary covers 54 square miles of open channels and tide flats located near the towns of the Coos Bay and North Bend on the southern Oregon coast. The estuary ranges between a mile and a mile and a half wide. A 42 ft. deep, sixteen-mile long ship channel is maintained from the harbor entrance to the Port of Coos Bay. Numerous slough systems and freshwater channels flow into Coos Bay. The narrow estuary is maintained at its mouth by two rock jetties extending from North Spit on the north and Coos Head on the south. From the harbor entrance the main channel bears northward past the communities of Charleston, Barview and Empire, then east around the city of North Bend, and south past downtown Coos Bay. At Coos Bay the channel bears east to the mouth of the Coos River. About two miles upstream the river divides into the Millicoma River on the left and the South Fork of the Coos River on the right.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INVENTORY of MARITIME ANTIQUES and RELICS of the COOS BAY AREA REFLECTIONS of a SOMETIMES FORGOTTEN PAST by Gail E. Curtis Or
    AN INVENTORY OF MARITIME ANTIQUES AND RELICS OF THE COOS BAY AREA REFLECTIONS OF A SOMETIMES FORGOTTEN PAST By Gail E. Curtis Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Summer, 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ,INTRODUCTION 1 - EXPLANATIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE INVENTORIED COLLECTIONS 7 MARITIME ANTIQUES AND RELICS 17 BOAT NAME PLATES 28 HALF MODELS 29 MARITIME LITERATURE 31 MARITIME MAPS, CHARTS, AND DRAWINGS 35 MARITIME PHOTOGRAPHS 39 LIFE SAVING STATION General History 75 LIFES SAVINGS CREW, STATION AND EQUIPMENT PHOTOGRAPHS.. 76 CAPE ARAGO LIGHTHOUSE PHOTOGRAPHS 78 JETTY CONSTRUCTIONS PHOTOGRAPHS BO EARLY MARSHFIELD PHOTOGRAPHS 83 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS Victor West 87 BIBLIOGRAPHY 92 DISTRIBUTION LIST 93 INTRODUCTION Coos Bay has always been tied to the sea. From the rich estuarys earliest settlement in the 1830s, its lines of supply Ind communication have been with the sea rather than the hinter- land across the Coast Range Mountains. Even as late as 1915 when the railroad came to southwestern Dregon, the sea, the bay, and the rivers of the Coos Bay region represented the main forms of coastwise trade with California and the inter-community trade from the farms and lumber camps of the interior to the urban market areas of Marshfield (Coos Bay) and later North Bend. In some respects,modern Coos Bay remains even more tied to the sea than in the past. Emerging as a major port of international trade, mainly through the export of its forest products, Coos Bays leaders recognize their communitys future fortune lies with the sea, for a form of transportation, an important food supply, and a desirable periphery for a living environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Above the Falls
    Revised, Second Edition Revised, Second Edition ABOVE THE FALLS Second Edition Joe Schapers’ homestead on Upper Glenn Creek, 1913 ABOVE THE FALLS Second Edition An Oral and Folk History of Upper Glenn Creek, Coos County, Oregon by Lionel Youst Including tape-recorded interviews, narratives, and other material by Alice Wilkinson Allen, Warren Browning, Belle Leaton Clarke, Hattie Leaton Cotter, Helen Cummings, Lillian Austin Edgehill, Wilma Leaton Hoellig, Allen Lively, Charles Middleton, Robert Milton, Erma Ott, Harold Ott, Jerry Phillips, Elwin Saling, Franklyn E. Smith, Marvin Stemmerman, Patricia Wilkinson, and George Youst. Written at Allegany, Oregon, September 1991 to September 1992, with revisions based on material received between 1992 and 2003. Golden Falls Publishing Allegany, Oregon Golden Falls Publishing, Allegany, Oregon © 2003 by Lionel Youst All rights reserved. First edition 1992 Second edition 2003 First impression 2003 Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-9726226-0-8 ISBN 0-9726226-1-6 (pbk.) Library of Congress cataloging data: F882.C7 Dewey Decimal cataloging data: 979.523 Youst, Lionel D., 1934 - Above The Falls, Second Edition Includes index, maps, bibliography, & photographs Frontier and Pioneer Life – Oregon – Coos County Logging – Oregon – Coos County – History Lumber Trade – Oregon – Coos County – History Coos County, Oregon – History Quotations at the beginning of each of the major parts of this book are from Rethinking Home: A Case for Writing Local History, by Joseph A. Amato, University of California Press (2002). They are used here with permission from the Regents of the University of California. Passages from A Century of Coos and Curry, by Peterson and Powers (1952), and Glancing Back (1972) are used with permission from the Coos County Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Bandon Hatchery
    BANDON HATCHERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 Bandon Hatchery (Beaver Creek, Big Creek Pond, Blossom, Charleston, Cunningham Creek, Coquille, Eel Creek, Ferry Creek, Hodges, Laverne Park, Millicoma Pond, Morgan Creek, Noble Creek, Saunders, Sevenmile Creek, Tenmile and Woodward Creek Acclimation Sites) INTRODUCTION Bandon Hatchery is located one mile east of the City of Bandon. The site is at an elevation of approximately 98 feet above sea level, at latitude 43.1161 and longitude -124.3842. Total land area is 32.7 acres. The hatchery water supply is obtained from two sources: Ferry Creek and Geiger Creek. Water from both sources is supplied by gravity. Starting on October 13, 2017, 3.5 cfs was transferred to the hatchery in which 2.5 was dedicated for fish production and 1 cfs for instream rights. This now gives the hatchery a combined total of 5.5 cfs. The facility is staffed with 3.0 FTE's. Rearing Facilities at Bandon Hatchery Unit Unit Unit Unit Unit Number Total Construction Type Length Width Depth Volume Units Volume Material Age Condition Comment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft3) (ft3) Adult Holding Pond 80 20 3.25 5200 1 5200 concrete 1950 poor spawning building built over first 20' of pond Raceway 120 20 3.5 8400 1 8400 concrete 1950 fair Raceway 110 20 3.67 8074 1 8074 concrete 1950 fair Raceway 50 20 5.5 5500 1 5500 concrete 1937 poor used for settling pond for vacuum sludge Raceway 45 15 2.5 1688 1 1688 concrete 1950 good Raceway 100 20 3.5 7000 1 7000 concrete 1950 poor used as acclimation ponds Raceways 100 20 3.5 7000 2 14000 concrete 1958 good Troughs 16 3.2 2 102 2 205 concrete 1958 fair Troughs 16.75’ 2.2 3 110.55 2 221.1 fiberglass 2018 excellent Troughs 16 2.5 1.33 53 4 213 fiberglass 1991 good Vertical incubators 448 2003 excellent 28 stacks of 16 trays PURPOSE Bandon Hatchery was constructed in 1925 and facility operations are funded by the State of Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis Was Because of Riparian Reserve Density Management Treatments Proposed in the Slater Rocks EA
    WATERSHED ANALYSIS MIDDLE FORK COQUILLE ANALYTICAL WATERSHED Version 1.1 Bureau of Land Management Coos Bay District Myrtlewood Resource Area October 2007 Approved by: ___________________________________ Myrtlewood Area Manager Note to reader: The reason for the second version (version 1.1) of the Middle Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis was because of Riparian Reserve density management treatments proposed in the Slater Rocks EA. Density management in Riparian Reserves was added to this Watershed Analysis as Issue 10: Density Management Treatments within Riparian Reserves. TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary......................................................................1 Introduction.................................................................5 Description of the Middle Fork Coquille Analytical Watershed.................7 Table 1. Land Ownership, basin area, and stream miles.......................7 Beneficial Uses/Values.......................................................8 Land Allocations.............................................................9 Table 2. BLM Land Allocations..............................................12 Fig. 1: Location of Coquille River in Oregon...............................13 Fig. 2: Coquille River Basin with Key Watersheds...........................14 Issues Evaluated in the Analysis............................................15 Issue 1: Native Fish Stocks................................................15 Issue 2: Riparian Condition................................................18 Issue 3: Aquatic Habitat...................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • The Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon
    Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon By Krista L. Jones, Jim E. O’Connor, Mackenzie K. Keith, Joseph F. Mangano, and J. Rose Wallick Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Open-File Report 2012–1064 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: South Fork Coquille River in the Broadbent Reach (Photograph by Krista L. Jones, U.S. Geological Survey, July 2010.) Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon By Krista L. Jones, Jim E. O’Connor, Mackenzie K. Keith, Joseph F. Mangano, and J. Rose Wallick Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Open-File Report 2012–1064 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.govFor more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Jones, K.L., O’Connor, J.E., Keith, M.K., Mangano, J.F., and Wallick, J.R., 2012, Preliminary assessment of channel stability and bed-material transport in the Coquille River basin, southwestern Oregon: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • State Waterway Navigability Determination
    BODY OF WATER & LOCATION NAV CG NON-NAV CG REMARKS yellow highlight = apply to USCG for permit up to RM stipulated Alsea Bay, OR X Estuary of Pacific Ocean. Alsea River, OR X Flows into Alsea Bay, Waldport, OR. Navigable to mile 13. Ash Creek, OR X Tributary of Willamette River at Independence, OR. Barrett Slough, OR X Tributary of Lewis and Clark River. Bayou St. John, OR X Court decision, 1935 AMC 594, 10 Mile Lake, Coos County, OR. Bear Creek (Coos County), OR X Tributary of Coquille River (tidal at mile 0.5) Beaver Creek, OR X Tributary of Nestucca River. Beaver Slough, OR X See Clatskanie River. Big Creek (Lane County), OR X At U.S. 101 bridge (tidal). Big Creek (Lincoln County), OR X Flows into Pacific Ocean. Big Creek Slough, OR X Upstream end at Knappa, OR (tidal). At site of Birch Creek (Sparks) Bridge on Canyon Road near Birch Creek, OR X Pendleton, OR. Side channel of Yaquina River. 3 mi. downstream from Toledo, Blind Slough, OR X OR (tidal). Tributary of Knappa Slough. 10 mi. upstream from Astoria, OR Blind Slough/ Gnat Creek, OR X (tidal at mile 2.0). Boone Slough, OR X Tributary of Yaquina River between Newport and Toledo, OR. Side channel of Willamette River. 3 miles upstream from Booneville Channel, OR X Corvallis, OR. Boulder Creek, OR X 7 miles N of Lake Quinalt. Side channel of Columbia River. 5 miles N of Clatskanie, OR Bradbury Slough, OR X (tidal). Brownlee Reservoir, ID /OR X See Snake River. Also known as South Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Coos River Paddling
    OREGON SOUTH COAST COOS RIVER PADDLING The spirit of Oregon South Coast flows through its waterways, sharing Fed by more than two dozen freshwater tributaries and spread over nearly common characteristics, offering similar bounties, yet each one distinct. 20 square miles, Coos Bay is the largest estuary on the Oregon South Coast, Whether finding their sources high in the Cascades, like the Umpqua and offering a variety of year round paddling opportunities. Ride the tides up Rogue, or rising from the rugged Coast Range, like the Coos, Coquille and sloughs and inlets, launch expeditions along the working waterfronts and Chetco, the rivers play a vital role, from wildlife and fish habitat to early- around bay islands, or explore the peaceful reaches of Sough National day transportation corridor and sport-fishing destination. For local tribes, Estuarine Research Reserve, the nation’s first protected estuary. “everything was about the river,” and this profound connection is still very Estuaries are protected embayments where rivers meet the sea. They support much a part of their culture. Today the rivers also enjoy a growing popularity a fascinating tapestry of life – from worms, clams and other tiny creatures with paddlers who have discovered these little-visited gems of Oregon South buried deep in the mud, to multitudes of young fish and crabs, to dozens of Coast. species of resident and migratory birds. Parts of Rogue and Chetco are federally-designated Wild and Scenic Rivers, In addition to its many natural attractions, the area has a rich and colorful and the Umpqua, Coos and Coquille flow into wide-ranging estuaries as they history, with fascinating remnants of the early pioneer days, as well as traces of near the sea, with inlets, sloughs, channels and quiet back waters to explore.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Steelhead Fishing in Oregon's Umpqua, Coos and Coquille Rivers
    Winter Steelhead Fishing in Oregonʼs Umpqua, Coos and Coquille Rivers 4/22/18, 1242 AM Custom Search BestFishingInAmerica.com Share Best Fishing in Oregon Home Winter Steelhead on the South-Central Best of Oregon Coast: Coos, Coquille and Umpqua Oregon Map Rivers About Us Southwestern Oregon’s rivers are known for excellent fishing for winter steelhead, a rainbow trout that fattens in the ocean like a salmon before returning to rivers from late fall through winter to spawn. Photo courtesy of Big K Ranch's Guide Service The following rivers (listed north to south) are the best spots in Douglas and Coos counties in the Oregon Shop New Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Southwest Zone. For Yamaha Sport rivers at the southern end of this zone, see Best Winter Boats Steelhead Fishing on Oregon’s South Coast. Also, for a look at some of the lesser-known and smaller winter steelhead fisheries in the zone, including some with wild fish harvest, try: Small Winter Steelhead Streams in Southwest Oregon. Umpqua River The Umpqua has plenty of fishing options – from huge You might also like these articles: salmon, sturgeon and striped bass to feisty smallmouth bass and shad. It also has tons of steelhead that run almost Best Winter Steelhead Fishing on the every month of the year. Rogue and Southern Oregon Coast Best Fishing in Oregon's Southwest Zone (Umpqua and Coos Bay Area) The mainstem can produce huge catches, as in 2006-07 Best Fishing in Oregon's Southwest Zone when nearly 4,200 fish were harvested. The previous few (Rogue and South Coast Rivers) Best Summer Steelhead Fishing on the seasons saw retention above 2,300, according to ODFW Oregon Coast catch records, but then fishing was pretty tough for a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Recent Physical Changes of the Oregon Coast
    rOREGON STATE UNIVERS TY LIBRARIES IIIIII 111IIIII1 IIII III 12 0002098016 65458 .8 05 cop .3 FINAL RE PORT (Report on an investigation carried out under Contract Nonr-2771 (04), Project NR 388-062, between the University of Oregon and the Office of Naval Research, U. S. Department of the Navy.) Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. SOME RECENT PHYSICAL CHANGES OF THE OREGON COAST by Samuel N. Dicken assisted by Carl L. Johannessen and Bill Hanneson Department of Geography University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon November 15, 1961 Reprinted in the public interest by the EugeneRegister-Guard and the Lane County Geographical Society,Inc., April, 1976. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The subject of coastal changes is of interest to many people living on or near the Oregon coast and, as a result, numerous interviews, only a few of which can be acknowledged, furnished much information not otherwise available. Valuable assistance came from persons concerned professionally with some aspect of coastal change. The staff of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, was most helpful, especially H. A. Kidby of the Rivers and Harbors Section, Lloyd Ruff of the Geology Section, Mr. Charles Oros of the Photogrammetry Office and Dorothy McKean, Librarian. Mr. E. Olson of the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey located copies of old charts and other materials.Ralph Mason of the Oregon State Department of Geology and Mineral Industriescon- tributed notes on Ecola Park and other areas. Robert L. Brown and the staff of the U. S. Soil Conservation Service furnished photographs andspec- ific information on vegetation changes of the dunes.Park Snavely of the U.
    [Show full text]