53118-001: Livable Cities Investment Project for Balanced Regional

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

53118-001: Livable Cities Investment Project for Balanced Regional Draft Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 53118-001 August 2021 Georgia: Livable Cities Investment Project for Balanced Regional Development Package LCIP-CW-15 Rehabilitation of the Central Part of Velistsikhe Village, Gurjaani Municipality Prepared by the Municipal Development Fund and Ministry of Regional Development & Infrastructure, Government of Georgia for the Asian Development Bank. This draft initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 11 June 2021) Currency units – United states Dollars (USD) USD 1.00 = GEL 3.1559 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ha – hectares km – kilometers km² – square kilometers m – meters m3 – cubic meters mm – millimeters NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AASHTO - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials CSC - Construction Supervisory Consultant DIN - Deutsches Institut für Normung EA - Executing Agency EARF - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EHS - Environmental, Health and Safety EAC - Environmental Assessment Code EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMoP Environmental Monitoring Plan EMP - Environmental Management Plan ERP - Emergency Response Plan EU - European Union IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IA - Implementing Agency IFC - International Finance Corporation IUAP - Integrated Urban Action Plans GEO - Georgia GRC - Grievance Redress Commission GIS - Geographic Information System GoG - Government of Georgia GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism HSP - Health and Safety Plans LARF - Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy Framework LARP - Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan LCIP - Livable Cities Investment Program MDF - Municipal Development Fund MPC - Maximum Permissible Concentrations MRDI - Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure MoEPA - Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture MESD - Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development MPC - Maximum Permissible Concentration NACHP - National Agency for Cultural Heritage Preservation NEA - National Environmental Agency PCRs - Physical Cultural Resources PIU - Project Implementation Unit PWD - People with Disabilities REA - Rapid Environmental Assessment SanN&R - Sanitarian Norms and Rules SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement SSEMP - Site-Specific Environmental Management Plan SWMCG - Solid Waste Management Company of Georgia TRTA - Transaction Technical Assistance WMP - Waste Management Plan WWTP - Wastewater Treatment Plant TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A. Project Rationale, Impact, Outcome and Outputs 1 B. Environmental Categorization and Environmental Due Diligence 2 C. Conclusions and recommendations 3 INTRODUCTION 5 A. Background 5 B. Purpose of the Initial Environmental Examination 6 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 7 A. Country Environmental Safeguard Policies 7 B. International Environmental Agreements and Applicability to LCIP 22 C. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement’s Environmental Requirements 23 D. Compatibility between Country’s and ADB Safeguard Policy 26 E. Administrative Framework 34 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 35 A. Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of Buildings 36 B. Rehabilitation of Central Street and Square Near Theater 38 C. Rehabilitation of Recreational Park 39 D. Construction of Bus Station 41 E. Wastewater Treatment 41 F. Drainage Network 45 ANALYSES OF ALTERNATIVES 47 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT 49 A. General Description 49 B. Geology, Geomorphology and Hazardous Geological Processes 50 C. Climate and Air Quality 50 D. Noise 55 E. Vibration 58 F. Hydrology 59 G. Soils 62 H. Biological Environment 65 I. Socio-Economic Environment 69 J. Infrastructure 70 K. Education 70 L. Cultural heritage 70 M. Tourism 73 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 74 A. Methodology 74 B. Summary of Activities and Anticipated Impacts 74 C. Required Environmental Documents 77 D. Air quality 77 E. Noise and Vibration 78 F. Water quality 80 G. Soil Quality and Topsoil Management 82 H. Biological Environment 82 I. Waste Management 84 J. Traffic 87 K. Impacts on Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Sites 88 L. Health and Safety Risks for Local Community 90 M. Occupational Health and Safety Risks 92 N. Construction Camps 93 O. Above plans will be approved by the Engineer prior to the beginning of Cumulative and Transboundary Impacts 94 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION 95 A. Stakeholder Consultations 95 B. Grievance Redress Mechanisms 95 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN 100 A. Environmental Management Plan (EMP) 100 B. Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) 119 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 125 A. Conclusions 125 B. Recommendations 127 Annex A. Impact Assessment Criteria 129 Annex B. esults of the inventory of trees and plants in the study area 138 Annex C. Minutes of Online Meetings with Stakeholders 171 Annex D. Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) 179 Annex E. NACHP Confirmation Letter on Approval of the Envisaged Works 187 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Applicable GoG Environmental Legislation and Specific Requirements for LCIP 7 Table 2 Ambient Air Quality Standards 14 Table 3 Georgian Standards for Noise Levels 15 Table 4 Applicable Noise Level Guidelines Per IFC EHS Guideline 16 Table 5 Applicable Work Environment Noise Limits Per IFC EHS Guidelines 16 Table 6 Georgian General Admissible Vibration Values 16 Table 7 AASHTO Maximum Vibration Levels for Preventing Damage 17 Table 8 Max. Admissible Concentrations of Various Substances and Elements in Soils 17 Table 9 Potable Water Criteria 18 Table 10 Applicable Standards for Surface Water Quality 18 Table 11 Water Quality Requirements by Water Use Category 19 Table 12 Indicative Values for Treated Sanitary Sewage Discharges 20 Table 13 Clearances and Permissions Required 21 Table 14 International conventions and treaties and Applicability to LCIP 22 Table 15 Comparative Analysis of Government and ADB Safeguard Requirements 26 Table 16 Quality requirements for (treated) wastewater 43 Table 17 Technical characteristics of biological treatment 44 Table 18 Air quality measurement results 51 Table 19 CO2 Measurement Results 51 Table 20 Dust (PM2,5; PM10) Measurement Results 52 Table 21 Noise measurement results 55 Table 22 Vibration measurement results 59 Table 23 Water sampling results in selected wells and Tchermiskhevi River 60 Table 24 List of taken samples 62 Table 25 Sampling methodology description 63 Table 26 Results of chemical analysis of soil mg/kg 64 Table 27 Anticipated site-specific impacts of the project 75 Table 28 Worker’s safety aspects 92 Table 29 Environmental Management Costs 105 Table 30 Environmental Management Matrix 107 Table 31 Environmental Monitoring Plan 120 Table 32 Impact assessment criteria for noise and vibration 129 Table 33 Impact assessment criteria for water 130 Table 34 Impact assessment criteria for soil 131 Table 35 Impact assessment criteria for geological environment 132 Table 36 Impact assessment criteria for the biological environment 133 Table 37 Impact assessment criteria for the visual/landscape environment 134 Table 38 Impact assessment criteria for the social environment 135 Table 39 Impact assessment criteria for the historical-cultural monuments 137 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project direct and indirect impact areas 35 Figure 2 Plan of the buildings to be rehabilitated within the project 37 Figure 3 Existing situation and render of Velisthikhe local administration office 37 Figure 4 Current situation and proposed render of the Square near the Theatre 38 Figure 5 Current situation and render of central street of the village 38 Figure 6 Current situation and render of the Theater of the village Velistsikhe 39 Figure 7 Drawing of central park of Velistsikhe 40 Figure 8 Existing appearance of the central park of Velistsikhe 40 Figure 9 Render of the pavilion 41 Figure 10 Biological treatment plant 42 Figure 11 Location of the planned wastewater treatment plants 42 Figure 12 Distance between planned WWTPs and the nearest residential house 45 Figure 13 Existing situation of the area for WWTP construction 46 Figure 14 Location of village Velistsikhe 49 Figure 15 15-minute dust (PM2,5) test in the park 52 Figure 16 15-minute dust (PM2,5) test nearby Church street 53 Figure 17 15-minute dust (PM10) test nearby Church street 53 Figure 18 15-minute dust (PM2,5) test nearby the proposed WWTP 54 Figure 19 15-minute dust (PM10) test nearby the proposed WWTP 54 Figure 20 12-hour uninterrupted noise level graph in the park 55 Figure 21 3-hour (9:00 -12:00) noise level graph near Church street 56 Figure 22 9-hour (12:00 – 21:00) noise level graph near Church street 56 Figure 23 12-hour uninterrupted noise level graph near the proposed WWTP 56 Figure 24 Nearby Church street 57 Figure 25 Nearby the proposed WWTP 57 Figure 26 VM-6380 Digital 3-Axis Vibration Meter Piezoelectric Sensor 58 Figure 27 Map of the vibration measurement locations 59 Figure 28 Water sampling locations 61 Figure 29 Greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus
Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    b Public Disclosure Authorized Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Construction Works for the Bakurtsikhe-Tsnori (16km) Public Disclosure Authorized Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Draft report October 2018 LIST OF ACRONIMS EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan ESIA - Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP - Environmental and Social Management Plan HSE - Health, Safety, Environment HS - Health and Safety GIS - Geographic Information System GoG - Government of Georgia IPPC - Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control KP - Kilometer Post MESD - Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia MEPA - Ministry of Environment Protection and Agriculture of Georgia MLHSA - Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia NGO - Non-Governmental Organization RD - Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia MRDI - Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia ToR - Terms of Reference WB - The World Bank Table of Contents 2.1 Environmental Policies and Laws of Georgia ....................................................................................... 2 2.2 Laws and Regulations Related to Social Aspects and Land Ownership .............................................. 5 2.3 Labor Legislation ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RBMP SEA Report ENG FINAL
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF THE DRAFTALAZANI-IORI RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN SEA Report November 2020 2 This SEA report was prepared by the national SEA team established for the pilot project “The Application of a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Draft Alazani-Iori River Basin Management Plan” (hereinafter also the SEA pilot project): Ms. Elina Bakradze (water and soil quality aspects), Ms. Anna Rukhadze (biodiversity, habitats and protected areas), Ms. Lela Serebryakova (health related aspects), Mr. Giorgi Guliashvili (hydrology and natural hazards), Mr. Davit Darsavelidze (socio-economic aspects), Mr. Irakli Kobulia (cultural heritage aspects and GIS) and the UNECE national consultant Ms. Irma Melikishvili (the team leader also covering climate change aspects), under the guidance and supervision of the UNECE international consultant Mr. Martin Smutny. Maps: The thematic maps presented in the SEA Report are produced by Mr. Irakli Kobulia on the basis of the GIS database provided by the EUWI + programme. The SEA Report also includes maps developed in the framework of the EUWI + programme (under result 2) by the REC Caucasus, subcontractor of the EUWI+ programme. The SEA pilot project was carried out under the supervision of Mr. Alisher Mamadzhanov, the EUWI+ programme leader from UNECE with the support provided by Ms. Christine Kitzler and Mr. Alexander Belokurov, UNECE and Ms. Eliso Barnovi, the EUWI+ Country Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019
    Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019 1 Table of Contents List of maps and figures......................................................................................................................3 List of tables ......................................................................................................................................3 List of Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. Introduction – background and justification. Geographical Coverage of the Programme .....6 1.1. General background ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Selection of the regions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II. Socio-economic situation and development trends in the targeted regions .........................9 Chapter ...........................................................................................................................................24 III. Summary of territorial development needs and potentials to be addressed in targeted regions .... 24 Chapter IV. Objectives and priorities of the Programme ................................................................... 27 4.1. Programming context for setting up PIRDP’s objectives and priorities ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Presidential Election First Interim Report of the Pre-Election Monitoring
    2018 Presidential Election First Interim Report of the Pre-Election Monitoring (August 1 - September 8) 13 September 2018 This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). Views expressed in this publication belong solely to the International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or the NED. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Key Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 2 III. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 4 IV. Electoral Administration ............................................................................................................. 5 Appointment of Temporary Members of DECs ................................................................................. 5 V. Media environment ........................................................................................................................ 9 VI. Intimidation/harassment on alleged political grounds ...................................................... 12 VII. Physical confrontation ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 Km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized
    Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure of Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Construction Works for the Gurjaani (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized October 2018 LIST OF ACRONIMS EA - Environmental Assessment EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan ESIA - Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP - Environmental and Social Management Plan HSE - Health, Safety, Environment HS - Health and Safety GIS - Geographic Information System GoG - Government of Georgia IPPC - Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control KP - Kilometer Post MESD - Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia MEPA - Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia MLHSA - Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia NGO - Non-Governmental Organization RD - Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia MRDI - Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia ToR - Terms of Reference WB - The World Bank Contents 2.1 Environmental Policies and Laws of Georgia ...............................................................................................2 2.2 Laws and Regulations Related to Social Aspects and Land Ownership ......................................................5 2.3 Labor Legislation ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Support in the Delineation and Characterization of Groundwater Bodies and the Design of a Ground- Water Monitoring Network in the Alazani-Iori Basin Districts
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 SUPPORT IN THE DELINEATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GROUNDWATER BODIES AND THE DESIGN OF A GROUND- WATER MONITORING NETWORK IN THE ALAZANI-IORI BASIN DISTRICTS IN GEORGIA Version EUWI-EAST-GE-03; February 2019 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Michael Sutter, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Georgia Zurab Jincharadze Responsible international thematic lead expert Christoph Leitner, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Responsible Georgian thematic lead expert Nana Kitiashvili and Merab Gaprindashvili (Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Geor- gia, LEPL National Environmental Agency) Authors Prepared by: Georgian Geothermal Association+ G. Melikadze, Al. Gventsadze, N. Kapanadze, S. Vepkhvadze, M. Todadze Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the technical report “SUPPORT IN THE DELINEATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GROUNDWATER BODIES AND THE DESIGN OF A GROUNDWA-TER MONITORING NET-WORKIN THE ALAZANI-IORI AND KHRAMI-DEBED RIVER BASIN DISTRICTS IN GEORGIA”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Economic Development Plan
    Local Economic Development Plan Gurjaani Municipality Georgia September 2019 Preface from Mayor Gurjaani is a municipality with a growing economic potential, having tourism and agriculture as the main sectors. It is a center of winemaking and viticulture, with a history of grapes and wine, dating back to more than 8,000 years. Most family wine cellars, wine factories and unique micro-zones are located here. Gurjaani Municipality has a natural transit location and is connected to almost all municipalities in Kakheti region, allowing it to play a leading role in terms of logistics, transport and tourism. Gurjaani should become a European type municipality – this is the main task and the core concept of the Gurjaani development platform. Introduction of the principles and experience of successful governance of the EU member states will guarantee enhancing of local economy in our municipality and will promote a positive dynamic in the process of development. The Local Economic Development Plan, developed within the framework of the initiative “Mayors for Economic Growth”, based on the local resources and capabilities, is an important document designed to overcome existing challenges and develop economy in 2020-2021. The activities envisaged in the mentioned document will be financed from the municipal budget, some activities will be co-financed from the state budget, with the involvement of private and civil sectors and donor organizations. This project will be a platform for attracting additional financial resources. I would like to express my commitment to facilitate the effective and proper implementation of the elaborated strategy and activities envisaged in it thus ensuring sustainable economic development of Gurjaani Municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia
    Road Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Reconstruction of Gurjaani-Bakurtsikhe Bypass Road Kakheti Regional Roads Improvement Project and Third Secondary and Local Roads Project Draft Final Report August 2015 LIST OF ACRONYMS AH Affected households AP Affected people CSC Construction Supervision Consultant CC Construction Contractor EA Environmental Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EWH East-West Highway GIS Geographic Information System GoG Government of Georgia GRC Grievance Redress Committee HSE Health, Safety, Environment HS Health and Safety HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle KP Kilometer Post MCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resource Protection MESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia MLHSA Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs NACHP National Agency of Cultural Heritage Protection NGO Non-Governmental Organization OP/BP World Bank’s Operational Policy / Bank Policy QC/QA Quality Control and Quality Assurance RAP Resettlement Action Plan RD Road Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia MENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection MRDIG Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia RBG Red Book of Georgia Protected Species RD Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia RoW Right of Way SEP Stakeholder
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency International Georgia Tbilisi, June 2014 Website
    Transparency International Georgia Tbilisi, June 2014 Website: http://transparency.ge/en The G-MEDIA program is made possible by support from the American people through USAID. The content and opinions expressed herein are those of Transparency International Georgia and do not reflect the views of the U.S. Government, USAID or IREX. Table of Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Ownership transparency ............................................................................................................................. 4 Sustainability of regional media ............................................................................................................... 5 Market Concentration ................................................................................................................................... 5 Financing of media outlets and media-related services from the local municipalities ........ 6 TV stations ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Trialeti TV and Radio (Gori) ....................................................................................................................... 7 TV Radio
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL
    Chapter V Affordable, Quality Healthcare and Social Security 1.1. Social Security of Population (Program Code: 35 02) Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL 1.1.1. Pension Payments to Population (Program Code: 35 02 01) • Beneficiaries of state pensions and state compensations envisaged in Laws of Georgia on State pension, State Commensations and State Academic Bursaries have been paid pensions through financing the commitments made by the State on pension payments; • State pensions have been paid in January to over 708.1 thousand individuals, in February – to over 708.6 thousand individuals, in March – to over 709.4 thousand individuals, in April – to over 710.6 thousand individuals, in May – to over 711.5 thousand individuals, in June – to over 713.0 thousand individuals, in July – to over 714,2 thousand individuals, in August – to over 716.3 thousand individuals, in September – to over 717.8 thousand individuals, while state compensations have been paid in January-February to over 20.7-20.7 thousand beneficiaries, in March – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries, in April-May – to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries, in June – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries and July-September - to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries. Total expenditure towards this end in the reporting period has been 1 153.1 MLN GEL. 1.1.2. Social Security of Targeted Groups of Population (Program Code: 35 02 02) • Number of beneficiaries getting subsistance minimum in January has amounted over 407.3 thousand individuals, February – over 422.0 thousand
    [Show full text]
  • National Assessment of Georgian Municipalities (2019)
    RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% % 21% 31% % 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% 31% 21% 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Proactive Disclosure of Public Information Participation and Accountability Administrative General The Council of Civil Advisors 7% Expenses 50% Information is yet to be created in MUNICIPALITIES 11% 11 Legal 40% Entities Legal Acts and Court Decisions 19% 33% Budget Property Only 26 MAYORS MAJORITY OF MEMBERS of only 15 held public hearings of their municipal councils held public hearings of 29% performance reports their performance
    [Show full text]