DOCSLIB.ORG

Basics of PET Imaging: Physics, Chemistry, and Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Basics of PET Imaging: Physics, Chemistry, and Regulations AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page i Basics of PET Imaging Physics, Chemistry, and Regulations AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page iii Gopal B. Saha, PhD Department of Molecular and Functional Imaging, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio Basics of PET Imaging Physics, Chemistry, and Regulations With 64 Illustrations AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page iv Gopal B. Saha, PhD Department of Molecular and Functional Imaging The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, OH 44195 USA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Saha, Gopal B. Basics of PET imaging physics, chemistry, and regulations / Gopal B. Saha. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-387-21307-4 (alk. paper) 1. Tomography, Emission. 2. Medical physics. [DNLM: 1. Tomography, Emission-Computed–methods. 2. Prospective Payment System. 3. Radiopharmaceuticals. 4. Technology, Radiologic. 5. Tomography, Emission-Computed–instrumentation. WN 206 S131b 2004] I. Title. RC78.7.T62S24 2004 616.07¢575—dc22 2004048107 ISBN 0-387-21307-4 Printed on acid-free paper. © 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adap- tation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of going to press, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made.The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed in the United States of America. (BS/EB) 987654321 SPIN 10987100 springeronline.com AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page v To my teachers, mentors, and friends AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page vii Preface From the early 1970s to mid-1990s, positron emission tomography (PET) as a diagnostic imaging modality had been for the most part used in ex- perimental research. Clinical PET started only a decade ago. 82Rb-RbCl and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug admin- istration in 1989 and 1994, respectively, for clinical PET imaging. Reim- bursement by Medicare was approved in 1995 for 82Rb-PET myocardial perfusion imaging and for 18F-FDG PET for various oncologic indica- tions in 1999. Currently several more PET procedures are covered for reimbursement. Based on the incentive from reimbursement for PET procedures and accurate and effective diagnosis of various diseases, PET centers are growing in the United States and worldwide. The importance of PET imaging has flourished to such a large extent that the Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board (NMTCB) is planning to introduce a PET specialty examination in 2004 for nuclear medicine technologists, as well as an augmented version of the PET specialty examination in 2005 for regis- tered radiographers and radiation therapy technologists. Courses are being offered all over the country to train physicians and technologists in PET technology. Many books on clinical PET have appeared in the market, but no book on the basics of PET imaging is presently available. Obviously, such a book is needed to fulfill the requirements of these courses and certifications. This book focuses on the fundamentals of PET imaging, namely, physics, instrumentation, production of PET radionuclides and radiopharma- ceuticals, and regulations concerning PET. The chapters are concise but comprehensive enough to make the topic easily understandable. Balanced reviews of pertinent basic science information and a list of suggested reading at the end of each chapter make the book an ideal text on PET imaging technology. Appropriate tables and appendixes include data and complement the book as a valuable reference for nuclear medicine professionals such as physicians, residents, and tech- nologists. Technologists and residents taking board examinations would vii AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page viii viii Preface benefit most from this book because of its brevity and clarity of content. The book contains 11 chapters. The subject of each chapter is covered on a very basic level and in keeping with the objective of the book. It is assumed that the readers have some basic understanding of physics and chemistry available in standard nuclear medicine literature. At the end of each chapter, a set of questions is included to provoke the reader to assess the sufficiency of knowledge gained. Chapter 1 briefly reviews the structure and nomenclature of the atoms, radioactive decay and related equations, and interaction of radiation with matter. This is the gist of materials available in many standard nuclear medicine physics book. Chapter 2 describes the properties of various detec- tors used in PET scanners. Descriptions of PET scanners, hybrid scintilla- tion cameras, PET/CT scanners, small animal PET scanners, and mobile PET scanners from different manufacturers as well as their features are given. Chapter 3 details how two-dimensional and three-dimensional data are acquired in PET and PET/CT imaging. Also included are the different factors that affect the acquired data and their correction method. Chapter 4 describes the image reconstruction technique and storage and display of the reconstructed images. A brief reference is made to DICOM, PACS, and teleradiology. The performance characteristics of different PET scanners such as spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, and so on, are given in Chapter 5. Quality control tests and acceptance tests of PET scanners are also included. Chapter 6 contains the general description of the princi- ples of cyclotron operation and the production of common PET radionu- clides. The synthesis and quality control of some common PET radiopharmaceuticals are described in Chapter 7. Chapter 8 covers perti- nent regulations concerning PET imaging. FDA, NRC, DOT, and state regulations are discussed. In Chapter 9, a historical background on reimbursement for PET procedures, and different current codes for billing and the billing process are provided. Chapter 10 outlines a variety of factors that are needed in the design of a new PET center. A cost estimate for setting up a PET facility is presented. Chapter 11 provides protocols for four common PET and PET/CT procedures. I do not pretend to be infallible in writing a book with such significant scientific information. Errors of both commission and omission may have occurred, and I would appreciate having them brought to my attention by the readers. I would like to thank the staff in our Department of Molecular and Functional Imaging for their assistance in many forms. I am grateful to Ms. Lisa M. Saake, Director of Healthcare Economics, Tyco Healthcare/ Mallinckrodt Medical, for her contribution to Chapter 9 in clarifying several issues regarding reimbursement and reshaping the front part of the chapter. It is beyond the scope of words to express my gratitude to Mrs. Rita Konyves, who undertook the challenge of typing and retyping the manu- AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page ix Preface ix script as much as I did in writing it. Her commitment and meticulous effort in the timely completion of the manuscript deserves nothing but my sincere gratitude and thanks. I am grateful and thankful to Robert Albano, Senior Clinical Medical Editor, for his suggestion and encouragement to write this book, and others at Springer for their support in publishing it. Cleveland, OH Gopal B. Saha, PhD AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page xi Contents Preface . vii 1. Radioactive Decay and Interaction of Radiation with Matter . 1 Atomic Structure . 1 Radioactive Decay . 2 Radioactive Decay Equations . 5 General Decay Equations . 5 Successive Decay Equations . 7 Units of Radioactivity . 9 Units of Radioactivity in System Internationale . 9 Calculations . 9 Interaction of Radiation with Matter . 10 Interaction of Charged Particles with Matter . 10 Interaction of g Radiation with Matter . 12 Attenuation of g Radiations . 14 Questions . 16 References and Suggested Reading . 18 2. PET Scanning Systems . 19 Background . 19 Solid Scintillation Detectors in PET . 20 Photomultiplier Tube . 23 Pulse Height Analyzer . 24 Arrangement of Detectors . 25 PET Scanners . 28 Hybrid Scintillation Cameras . 29 PET/CT Scanners . 30 Small Animal PET Scanner . 34 Mobile PET or PET/CT . 36 Questions . 37 References and Suggested Reading . 38 xi AHAPR 10/20/2004 1:32 PM Page xii xii Contents 3. Data Acquisition and Corrections . 39 Data Acquisition . 39 Two-Dimensional Versus 3-Dimensional . 43 PET/CT Data Acquisition . 45 Factors Affecting Acquired Data . 47 Normalization . 47 Photon Attenuation . 48 Random Coincidences . 53 Scatter Coincidences . 54 Dead Time . 55 Radial Elongation . 56 Questions . 57 References and Suggested Reading . 58 4. Image Reconstruction, Storage and Display . 59 Simple Backprojection . 59 Filtered Backprojection . 61 The Fourier Method . 62 Types of Filters . 64 Iterative Reconstruction . 67 3-D Reconstruction . 70 Partial Volume Effect . 70 Storage . 72 Display . 73 Software and DICOM . 74 PACS . 76 Teleradiology . 79 Questions . 79 References and Suggested Reading . 80 5. Performance Characteristics of PET Scanners . 81 Spatial Resolution . 81 Sensitivity . 84 Noise Equivalent Count Rate . 86 Scatter Fraction . 87 Contrast . 87 Quality Control of PET Scanners . 89 Daily Quality Control Tests . 89 Weekly Quality Control Tests . 89 Acceptance Tests . 90 Spatial Resolution . 92 Scatter Fraction . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the First Electromagnetic Measurement of the Velocity of Light by Wilhelm Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch
    Andre Koch Torres Assis On the First Electromagnetic Measurement of the Velocity of Light by Wilhelm Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch Abstract The electrostatic, electrodynamic and electromagnetic systems of units utilized during last century by Ampère, Gauss, Weber, Maxwell and all the others are analyzed. It is shown how the constant c was introduced in physics by Weber's force of 1846. It is shown that it has the unit of velocity and is the ratio of the electromagnetic and electrostatic units of charge. Weber and Kohlrausch's experiment of 1855 to determine c is quoted, emphasizing that they were the first to measure this quantity and obtained the same value as that of light velocity in vacuum. It is shown how Kirchhoff in 1857 and Weber (1857-64) independently of one another obtained the fact that an electromagnetic signal propagates at light velocity along a thin wire of negligible resistivity. They obtained the telegraphy equation utilizing Weber’s action at a distance force. This was accomplished before the development of Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory of light and before Heaviside’s work. 1. Introduction In this work the introduction of the constant c in electromagnetism by Wilhelm Weber in 1846 is analyzed. It is the ratio of electromagnetic and electrostatic units of charge, one of the most fundamental constants of nature. The meaning of this constant is discussed, the first measurement performed by Weber and Kohlrausch in 1855, and the derivation of the telegraphy equation by Kirchhoff and Weber in 1857. Initially the basic systems of units utilized during last century for describing electromagnetic quantities is presented, along with a short review of Weber’s electrodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion of the MKSA Units to the MKS and CGS Units
    American Journal of Electromagnetics and Applications 2018; 6(1): 24-27 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajea doi: 10.11648/j.ajea.20180601.14 ISSN: 2376-5968 (Print); ISSN: 2376-5984 (Online) Progress of the SI and CGS Systems: Conversion of the MKSA Units to the MKS and CGS Units Askar Abdukadyrov Mechanical Faculty, Kyrgyz Technical University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Email address: To cite this article: Askar Abdukadyrov. Progress of the SI and CGS Systems: Conversion of the MKSA Units to the MKS and CGS Units. American Journal of Electromagnetics and Applications . Vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 24-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ajea.20180601.14 Received : April 16, 2018; Accepted : May 2, 2018; Published : May 22, 2018 Abstract: Recording of the equations in mechanics does not depend on the choice of system of measurement. However, in electrodynamics the dimension of the electromagnetic quantities (involving current, charge and so on) depends on the choice of unit systems, such as SI (MKSА), CGSE, CGSM, Gaussian system. We show that the units of the MKSA system can be written in the units of the MKS system and in conforming units of the CGS system. This conversion allows to unify the formulas for the laws of electromagnetism in SI and CGS. Using the conversion of units we received two new formulas that complement Maxwell's equations and allow deeper to understand the nature of electromagnetic phenomena, in particular, the mechanism of propagation of electromagnetic waves. Keywords: SI, CGS, Unit Systems, Conversion of Units, Maxwell's Equations Thus, to unify the formulas of electrodynamics in SI and 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Redefinition of the International System of Units
    Redefinition of the International System of Units Martin Hudlička Czech metrology institute [email protected] CTU FEE K13117 Departmental seminar, 12th February 2019, Prague Overview • SI history • Measurement traceability • The need for change of SI units • Preparations for change – the kilogram – the mole – the ampere – the kelvin • Consequences for users • Further reading CTU FEE K13117 Departmental seminar, 12th February 2019, Prague SI history • various units used for thousands of years, some of systems stable over time • mostly based on nature or human body measures (which were thought to be constant) – Babylonian system (example – units of length) source: Wikipedia CTU FEE K13117 Departmental seminar, 12th February 2019, Prague SI history – Egyptian system measurement of length, volume, mass, time bronze capacity weight measure standard source: Wikipedia CTU FEE K13117 Departmental seminar, 12th February 2019, Prague SI history • many other official measurement systems for large societies (Olympic system of Greece, Roman system, ...), some of the systems adopted into later systems • English system – measurements used in England up to 1826, huge number of units for various areas – liquid measures (dram, teaspoon, tablespoon, pint, gallon, ...) – length (digit, finger, inch, nail, palm, hand, ...) – weight (grain, pound, nail, stone, ounce, ...) • Imperial system (post-1824) used in the British Empire and countries in the British sphere of influence credit: D. Pisano, Flickr CTU FEE K13117 Departmental seminar, 12th February 2019,
    [Show full text]
  • The Daniell Cell, Ohm's Law and the Emergence of the International System of Units
    The Daniell Cell, Ohm’s Law and the Emergence of the International System of Units Joel S. Jayson∗ Brooklyn, NY (Dated: December 24, 2015) Telegraphy originated in the 1830s and 40s and flourished in the following decades, but with a patchwork of electrical standards. Electromotive force was for the most part measured in units of the predominant Daniell cell. Each company had their own resistance standard. In 1862 the British Association for the Advancement of Science formed a committee to address this situation. By 1873 they had given definition to the electromagnetic system of units (emu) and defined the practical units of the ohm as 109 emu units of resistance and the volt as 108 emu units of electromotive force. These recommendations were ratified and expanded upon in a series of international congresses held between 1881 and 1904. A proposal by Giovanni Giorgi in 1901 took advantage of a coincidence between the conversion of the units of energy in the emu system (the erg) and in the practical system (the joule) in that the same conversion factor existed between the cgs based emu system and a theretofore undefined MKS system. By introducing another unit, X (where X could be any of the practical electrical units), Giorgi demonstrated that a self consistent MKSX system was tenable without the need for multiplying factors. Ultimately the ampere was selected as the fourth unit. It took nearly 60 years, but in 1960 Giorgi’s proposal was incorporated as the core of the newly inaugurated International System of Units (SI). This article surveys the physics, physicists and events that contributed to those developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Units of Measurement Course Handouts
    AETD MINI-COURSE 115: UNITS OF MEASUREMENT COURSE HANDOUTS D.G. SIMPSON FEBRUARY 2013 GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, MARYLAND Contents 1 Metric Prefixes 2 1.1 SI Prefixes............................................ 2 1.2 Computer Prefixes....................................... 3 2SIUnits 4 2.1SIBaseUnits.......................................... 4 2.2SIDerivedUnits(StandardMKSABaseUnits)........................ 5 2.3SIDerivedUnits(MVSABaseUnits)............................. 6 2.4SIEquationsofElectromagnetism............................... 7 3 Electrostatic Units 8 3.1ElectrostaticBaseUnits..................................... 8 3.2ElectrostaticDerivedUnits................................... 9 3.3ElectrostaticEquationsofElectromagnetism.......................... 10 4 Electromagnetic Units 11 4.1ElectromagneticBaseUnits................................... 11 4.2ElectromagneticDerivedUnits................................. 12 4.3ElectromagneticEquationsofElectromagnetism........................ 13 5 Gaussian Units 14 5.1GaussianBaseUnits...................................... 14 5.2GaussianDerivedUnits..................................... 15 5.3GaussianEquationsofElectromagnetism........................... 16 6 Heaviside-Lorentz Units 17 6.1Heaviside-LorentzBaseUnits................................. 17 6.2Heaviside-LorentzDerivedUnits................................ 18 6.3Heaviside-LorentzEquationsofElectromagnetism...................... 19 7 Units of Physical Quantities 20 8 Formula Conversion Table 23 9 Unit Conversion Tables 25 10 Physical
    [Show full text]
  • The 1856 Weber-Kohlrausch Experiment (The Speed of Light)
    The 1856 Weber-Kohlrausch Experiment (The Speed of Light) Frederick David Tombe, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, [email protected] 18th October 2015 Abstract. Nineteenth century physicists Wilhelm Eduard Weber, Gustav Kirchhoff, and James Clerk-Maxwell are all credited with connecting electricity to the speed of light. Weber’s breakthrough in 1856, in conjunction with Rudolf Kohlrausch, revealed the speed of light in the context of a ratio as between two different units of electric charge. In 1857 Kirchhoff connected this ratio to the speed of an electric signal travelling along a wire. Later, in 1862, Maxwell connected this ratio to the elasticity in the all-pervading luminiferous medium that serves as the carrier of light waves. This paper sets out to establish the fundamental cause of the speed of light. Introduction I. The 1856 Weber-Kohlrausch experiment established a ratio between two different units of electric charge. The experiment involved discharging a Leyden jar (a capacitor) that had been storing a known amount of charge in electrostatic units, and then seeing how long it took for a unit of electric current, as measured in electrodynamic units, to produce the same deflection in a galvanometer. This resulted in a ratio C, known as Weber’s constant, and we know today that it is equal to c√2 where c is the directly measured speed of light. Weber interpreted this ratio in connection with the convectively induced force that he had identified and formulated in 1846 as between two charged particles in relative motion. He believed C to be the speed that would produce an exact counterbalancing force to the electrostatic force.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Definitions in Electrostatic Units
    25 Definitions in Electrostatic Units As explained in Section 17.6, the observations made in Oersted's experiment gives rise to either define electrical quantities first, or magnetic quantities first, which are named ESU and EMU. The flowchart of definitions in ESU will be presented in this chapter, and the definitions in EMU will be presented in the following chapter. The definitions will be revised in the future chapters, without the use of magnetic charges. Figure 25.1: The definitions flowchart in electrostatic units. Each of the definitions will be summarized in this chapter. Note that there are no circular definitions of the same quantity, and therefore, the electrical quantities are well defined. It will become clear, why some of the equations presented in the previous chapters are valid only in ESU, or EMU, or common to both ESU and EMU. It will become clear that some of the equations, although the units of the variables are different between ESU and EMU, are common to both the systems of units. 25.1 Electric Charge q The electric charge is defined first in ESU using Coulomb's law, q q F~ = 1 2 r;^ (25.1, ESU) r2 172 where q1 and q2 are two points charges, r is the distance between them, andr ^ is the unit vector indicating the direction of the force. The unit electric charge is defined as two equal unit point charges, separated by 1 cm, exerting a force of 1 dyne on each other. 25.2 Electric Field E~ Once the electric charge has been defined, it follows that the electric field E~ can be defined from the force F~ exerted on charge q, F~ E~ = : (25.2) q 25.3 Voltage V The voltage V between two points A and B is the path integral of the electric field E~ , Z B V = E~ · dl:~ (25.3) A It was proven that the electric field is a conservative field, and the above value is independent of the path from A to B.
    [Show full text]
  • SI and CGS Units in Electromagnetism
    SI and CGS Units in Electromagnetism Jim Napolitano January 11, 2021 Two divergent systems of units established themselves over the course of the 20th century. One system, known as SI (from the French Le Systeme` International d’Unites),´ is rooted in the laboratory. It gained favor in the engineering community and forms the basis for most undergraduate curricula. The other system, called Gaussian, is aesthetically cleaner and is much favored in the theoretical physics community. We use the Gaussian system in this book, as do most graduate level physics texts on Quantum Mechanics and other subjects. The SI system is also known as MKSA (for meter, kilogram, second, Ampere), and the Gaussian system is some- times called1 CGS (for centimeter, gram, second). For problems in mechanics, the difference is trivial, amounting only to some powers of ten. The difficulty comes when incorporating electromagnetism. As discussed below, SI incorpo- rates a fourth base unit, the Ampere, which implies that charge and other electromagnetic quantities are dimensionally distinct between the SI and Gaussian systems. This one point is the source of all the confusion. In other words, although we can write that a meter is equal to 100 centimeters, the SI unit of charge, called the Coulomb, is not equal to any number of electrostatic units (esu), the Gaussian unit of charge. The two kinds of charges literally have different physical meanings. They should probably have different names, but historically they are both called “charge.” Similar comments apply to electric current, electric and magnetic fields, the electric potential, and so on. This why you see factors like e0 and m0 appear in SI formulas, whereas factors of c are common in Gaussian formulas.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Reading Appendix C. Systems of Units in Nonlinear Optics
    600 Appendices Further reading Jackson, J.D., 1975. Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition. Wiley, New York. Marion, J.B., Heald, M.A., 1980. Classical Electromagnetic Radiation. Academic Press, New York. Purcell, E.M., 1965. Electricity and Magnetism. McGraw-Hill, New York. Appendix C. Systems of Units in Nonlinear Optics There are several different systems of units that are commonly used in nonlin- ear optics. In this appendix we describe these different systems and show how to convert among them. For simplicity we restrict the discussion to a medium with instantaneous response so that the nonlinear susceptibilities can be taken to be dispersionless. Clearly the rules derived here for conversion among the systems of units are the same for a dispersive medium. In the gaussian system of units, the polarization P (t) is related to thefield ˜ strength E(t) by the equation ˜ P (t) χ (1)E(t) χ (2)E2(t) χ (3)E3(t) . (C.1) ˜ = ˜ + ˜ + ˜ +··· In the gaussian system, all of thefields E, P, D, B, H , and M have the same ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ units; in particular, the units of P and E are given by ˜ ˜ � � � � � � statvolt statcoulomb erg 1/2 P E . (C.2) ˜ = ˜ = cm = cm2 = cm3 Consequently, we see from Eq. (C.1) that the dimensions of the susceptibili- ties are as follows: χ (1) is dimensionless, (C.3a) � � � � 1/2 � � 1 cm erg − χ (2) , (C.3b) = E = statvolt = cm3 � ˜ � � � 2 1 � � 1 cm erg − χ (3) . (C.3c) = E2 = statvolt2 = cm3 ˜ The units of the nonlinear susceptibilities are often not stated explicitly in the gaussian system of units; one rather simply states that the value is given in electrostatic units (esu).
    [Show full text]
  • Page I.1 University of New Mexico Department of Physics And
    University of New Mexico Department of Physics and Astronomy __________________________________________________________________ Physics 511 - Graduate Electrodynamics Prof. I. H. Deutsch Lecture I - Overview I.A Introduction Electricity and magnetism is represented by one of the most beautiful and complete physical theories. During mostly the 18th and 19th centuries scientists amassed a huge collection of empirical data ranging from the effect of electricity on the reflex of a frog leg, to Ørsted and Ampère's discovery of the relation between electric current and magnetism, to Faraday's discovery of electromagnetic induction. This produced important knowledge of the phenomenology of electricity and magnetism and gave strong indication of the unity of these phenomena. This all collimated with Maxwell who reformulated the data in 1873 into a mathematical model which agreed with all measurements. But there was something asymmetric about the theory. A changing magnetic flux produced the electric field, but what about the reverse process? From purely theoretical grounds Maxwell added his now famous "displacement current" which in turn led him to PREDICT that light itself was a wave of the electromagnetic field, a prediction that was verified by Hertz in his 1885-1889 experiments, thereby unifying optics with E&M. The early 20th century gave us the null result of the Michaelson-Morley experiment in their search for the "luminiferous ether", followed by Einstein's revolutionary hypotheses at the foundation of relativity and the unification of space and time. Einstein's dream of the unification of gravity and electromagnetism was not achieved; he of course had deep philosophical problems with quantum field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Units in Electricity and Magnetism
    Units in Electricity and Magnetism The tables below list the systems of electrical and magnetic units. They only include units of interest in the field of Radio. The older systems were the CGS(centimeter-gram-second) and Gaussian systems. The Gaussian system being based on a mix of Electrostatic units (ESU) and Electromagnetic units (EMU). The current standard is the International System of Units (SI) and is sometimes referred to as rationalised MKS units. The MKS system of units is a physical system of units that expresses any given measurement using fundamental units of the metre, kilogramme, and/or second (MKS) Conversions from one system to others are given in two ways. Firstly numerically by multiplying factors. Note that c stands for the velocity of light in space and its value is exactly 299792458 metre/second exactly (by definition of the metre). The other method of conversion allows you to change formulas given in old books into the modern SI form. This will be particularly useful to you if, like me, you have books by Terman, Scroggie, etc. or the Admiralty Handbook of Wireless Telegraphy. There were lots of useful formulas in these old books, which can now be given new life. I have tried to make the tables as complete and accurate as possible and have checked lots of different sources. Nevertheless there may be errors and I will be grateful for any corrections or additions. Please email me at the address given on the home page. SI Units Quantity Symbol Unit & (Abbr.) Dimensions ESU EMU Mass m kilogram (kg) M 1000 1000 Length l metre (m) L 100 100 Time t second (s) T 1 1 Power P watt (W) ML2T-3 107 107 Electric Current I ampere (A) I=M½L1½T-2 10c 0.1 Charge Q coulomb (C) TI 10c 0.1 Electric Potential V volt (V) ML2T-3I-1 106/c 108 Resistance R ohm ( ) ML2T-3I-2 105/c2 109 Conductance G siemens (S) M-1L-2T3I2 10-5c2 10-9 Inductance H henry (H) ML2T-2I-2 105/c2 109 Capacitance C farad (F) M-1L-2T4I2 10-5c2 10-9 Electric Field Strength E volt/metre (V m-1) MLT-3I-1 104/c 106 Electric Charge Density coulomb/cu.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CHAPTER 16 CGS ELECTRICITY and MAGNETISM 16.1 Introduction We Are Accustomed to Using MKS (Metre-Kilogram-Second) Units
    1 CHAPTER 16 CGS ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM 16.1 Introduction We are accustomed to using MKS (metre-kilogram-second) units. A second, at one time defined as a fraction 1/86400 of a day, is now defined as 9 192 631 770 times the period of a hyperfine line emitted in the spectrum of the 133 Cs (caesium) atom. A metre was at one time defined as one ten- millionth of the length of a quadrant of Earth's surface measured from pole to equator. Later it was defined as the distance between two scratches on a platinum-iridium bar held on Paris. Still later, it was defined in terms of the wavelength of one or other of several spectral lines that have been used in the past for this purpose. At present, the metre is defined as the distance travelled by light in vacuo in a time of 1/(299 792 458) second. A kilogram is equal to the mass of a platinum-iridium cylinder held in Paris. The day may come when we are able to define a kilogram as the mass of so many electrons, but that day is not yet. For electricity and magnetism, we extended the MKS system by adding an additional unit, the ampère, whose definition was given in Chapter 6, Section 6.2, to form the MKSA system. This in turn is a subset of SI (le Système International des Unités), which also includes the kelvin, the candela and the mole. An older system of units, still used by some authors, was the CGS (centimetre-gram-second) system.
    [Show full text]