Giving and Sharing in the Computer-Mediated Economy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Giving and Sharing in the Computer-Mediated Economy Journal Code Article ID Dispatch: 13.10.14 CE: C B 1 4 9 9 No. of Pages: 9 ME: 1 Journal of Consumer Behaviour, J. Consumer Behav. (2014) 66 2 Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/cb.1499 67 3 68 4 69 5 Giving and sharing in the computer-mediated economy 70 6 71 7 JOHN HARVEY1*, ANDREW SMITH2 and DAVID GOLIGHTLY3 72 8 1Horizon Digital Economy Research, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK 73 9 2Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham University, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK 74 10 3Human Factors Research Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 75 11 76 12 77 13 ABSTRACT 78 14 The paper examines how digital technology mediates the behaviour of consumers in three online systems that facilitate offline gift giving 79 15 and sharing (Freecycle, Couchsurfing, and Landshare). Findings derived from a netnography and depth interviews reveal how technology is 80 16 used to enact and influence the management of identity, partner selection, ritual normalisation, and negotiation of property rights. The findings 81 17 have significant implications for the design and management of systems that encourage non-monetary forms of collaborative consumption. 82 18 Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 83 19 84 20 85 21 86 22 INTRODUCTION research objective is to understand how technology mediates 87 23 the ambiguities that arise from this hybridization in order 88 24 A variety of informal offline exchange systems have been to create and perpetuate structured, ritualised behaviour. 89 25 facilitated by the internet. Consumers with common interests The following section reviews the principal dimensions of 90 26 come together online before meeting offline for the purpose giving and sharing. The research design is then discussed, 91 27 of exchanging, giving or sharing goods. Many of the services prior to an exposition of the results of the netnographies 92 28 are designed and positioned as being explicitly pro-social, and depth interviews. 93 29 i.e. the participants who offer their possessions to others do 94 30 so at a personal cost and without immediate gain (Penner 95 31 et al., 2005). As mobile technology has become ubiquitous, FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF GIVING AND 96 32 the number of these systems appears to be increasing in SHARING 97 33 number as a result of the improved potential to match 98 34 people across space and time. Recently, there has been a The phenomenon of gift giving has received an enormous 99 35 surge of commercial activity in the field of ‘collaborative amount of cross-disciplinary attention over the past century. 100 36 consumption’—atermfirstcoinedbyFelsonandSpaeth Because seminal work by Mauss (1925) and Malinowski 101 37 (1978) and popularised in Botsman and Rogers, 2011 by (1922) scholars in anthropology, sociology, economics, 102 38 Botsman and Rogers. These systems help consumers to exploit philosophy, and consumer research have examined the 103 39 a spare pool of resources; they can reduce the cost of acquisi- antecedents of giving. Sharing in contrast has received less 104 40 tion and the environmental impact of consumption in com- explicit attention than gift giving but has been the focus of 105 41 parison to the more typical product lifecycle. Crucially, many studies in numerous different disciplines (e.g. Benkler, 2004; 106 42 of these systems eschew or even prohibit monetary-based Widlock, 2004; Belk, 2010). Despite this wealth of research, 107 43 transactions, favouring deliberate redistribution of resources the scope of gift giving and sharing is so diverse and complex 108 44 without formalised quid-pro-quo exchange (Albinnson and that application of universal rules or typologies is difficult, if 109 45 Perera, 2012). Unlike comparable transactions (that rely on not impossible. However, there are a number of dimensions 110 46 money to create equivalence through a shared understanding that can be used to classify these types of economic exchanges, 111 47 of quantified value), technology helps to mediate the transfer, including agency, structure, ritual and property. These are 112 48 aiding both donor and recipient alike. Despite the wealth of now discussed in turn. 113 49 research into gift giving and sharing as well as the abundance 114 50 of computer-mediated pro-social exchange systems, the role 115 51 that technology plays in these economic transfers has received AGENCY AND STRUCTURE 116 52 little attention in the consumer research literature. Dobscha 117 53 and Arsel (2011) have described the emergence of these Yan (2005) suggests that a core classification variable of gift 118 54 systems as a form of hybridised exchange that does not giving behaviour is the agency of social actors, that is, do 119 55 correspond to a singular prototypical behaviour such as people exchange gifts on behalf of the respective groups that 120 56 giving, sharing, or commodity exchange (refer to Belk, 2010) they belong to, such as family, lineage or community? Or, 121 57 but instead demonstrate characteristics of each. The core alternatively, is the gift exchanged between two autonomous 122 58 individuals? Much of the anthropological research into gift 123 59 giving examines intercommunity gifting and describes how 124 *Correspondence to: John Harvey, Horizon Digital Economy Research Hub, 60 University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. giving as a means of economic distribution within archaic 125 61 E-mail: [email protected] societies creates social bonds that form important macro- 126 62 127 63 128 64 Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 129 65 130 1 2 J. Harvey et al. 66 2 67 3 level structures. Contemporary research into gifting has resource? Subtractability defines the potential of a resource 68 4 primarily focused on dyadic perspectives because giving to be consumed repeatedly, that is, if one person consumes 69 5 as a means of economic distribution has largely been re- a resource, is it then possible to be consumed again, either 70 6 placed with immediate reciprocity, that is, secularised mar- by the original consumer or another? Because of the ease 71 7 ket economies. Within the field of consumer research of replicating digital information, consumption by one 72 8 Sherry (1983) developed a processual model of giving that person does not necessarily diminish the consumption 73 9 provided a conceptual springboard for others in the field. quality for another—it is therefore not beleaguered by 74 10 Here, the gift is viewed as a continuous act of reciprocity, subtractability like most physical resources. A property right 75 11 whereby the act of giving provides a dialectical chain be- is an enforceable authority to undertake particular actions in 76 12 tween dyads. The process can be studied across three phases a specific domain (Commons, 1968). “Property rights define 77 13 through which the relationship between giver and receiver actions that individuals can take in relation to other individuals 78 14 progresses: gestation, prestation, and reformulation. Much regarding some ‘thing’. If one individual has a right, someone 79 15 of the research in this area emphasises the importance of else has a commensurate duty to observe that right” 80 16 giving and receiving as a means of fostering and maintain- (Ostrom, 2003, p.249). Research into sharing and giving 81 17 ing interpersonal connections with family and friends often focuses on alienability as the predominant means of 82 18 (Wooten, 2000; Joy, 2001; Wooten and Wood, 2004; Brad- understanding consumer behaviour, or as Barthes (1972, p.73) 83 19 ford, 2009). once criticised the bourgeoisie, property is seen as nothing 84 20 Recently, attention has been paid to the concept of “but a dialectical moment in the general enslavement of 85 21 intracommunity gifting, that is, non-reciprocal or asymmet- Nature.” It makes little sense to speak of alienability (or 86 22 ric relationships of economic transfer between an individual inalienability) as a simple dualism; property rights are much 87 23 and a community. These types of gifts are perhaps best de- more nuanced than simple changes of ownership. Many 88 24 scribed as a form of sharing. According to Weinberger and actors (either individual or grouped) can simultaneously lay 89 25 Wallendorf (2011), previous research has primarily focused claim to aspects of a resource. This has been called ‘tenure 90 26 on gifting in which the central goal is interpersonal relation- niche’ and can be construed in different ways depending on 91 27 ship maintenance. Intracommunity gifting occurs when the type of resource being appropriated (Bruce, 1995). 92 28 community members in one social position give to commu- Ostrom and Hess (2007), updating Ostrom and Schlager, 93 29 nity members in another position in which the central goal 1996) recognise a hierarchy of seven positions that can be 94 30 is intracommunity, rather than interpersonal. Most of the associated with bundles of property rights: access, contri- 95 31 research into giving online has been explored in relation bution, extraction, removal, management, exclusion, and 96 32 to crowd sourcing projects and peer-to-peer networks, alienation. The most basic right ‘Access’ is defined as the 97 33 where gifts manifest virtually. In his study of Napster, right to enter a defined physical area and enjoy non- 98 34 Giesler (2003, 2006) acknowledges that the traditional subtractive benefits. The highest property right that a person 99 35 models of dyadic gift giving offer only a limited insight can attain over a resource is that of alienation, that is, the 100 36 into the digital sphere as a result of the one-to-many right to sell, lease or give away extraction, management, 101 37 forms of giving made possible by networked technologies and exclusion rights. Crucially, the right of alienation is 102 38 such as the internet.
Recommended publications
  • Bewelcome.Org
    Bewelcome.org – a non-profit democratic hospex service set up for growth. Rustam Tagiew Alumni of TU Bergakademie Freiberg [email protected] Abstract—This paper presents an extensive data-based anal- the difference between the terms user, which is basically a ysis of the non-profit democratic hospitality exchange service profile owner, and member – not every website user had a bewelcome.org. We hereby pursuit the goal of determining the real-life interaction with other members in order to be called factors influencing its growth. It also provides general insights a member. Members are a subset of users. on internet-based hospitality exchange services. The other investi- Hospex services always started as non-profit, donation gated services are hospitalityclub.org and couchsurfing.org. Com- and volunteer-driven organizations, since making profit on munities using the three services are interconnected – comparing their data provides additional information. gratuitous hospitality is considered unethical in modern culture. Nevertheless, business on gratuitous hospitality is common at least in mediation of au-pairs to host families [9, I. INTRODUCTION eg.]. Unfortunately, we can not access the data from CS – the The rite of gratuitous hospitality provided by local biggest hospex service. CS became a for-profit corporation in residents to strangers is common among almost all known 2011 and shut down the access of public science to its data. human cultures, especially traditional ones. We can cite Scientists possessing pre-incorporation CS data are prohibited melmastia of Pashtun [1, p. 14], terranga of Wolof [2, p. to share it with third parties. HC never allowed access of 17] and hospitality of Eskimo [3] as examples of traditional public science to its data.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Platforms for Exchanging and Sharing Goods
    CASE STUDY ONLINE PLATFORMS FOR EXCHANGING AND SHARING GOODS by Anders Fremstad 2/2/2015 A project of EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Americans own huge and underutilized stocks of consumer goods, including furniture, appliances, tools, toys, vehicles, and lodging. Websites like Craigslist, Couchsurfing, and NeighborGoods have lowered the transaction costs associated with acquiring secondhand goods and sharing underused goods, which may help us take advantage of this excess capacity. Indeed, advocates of the so-called sharing economy argue that technology can facilitate peer-to-peer transactions that enable us to save money, build community, and reduce environmental burdens. This case study evaluates the economic, social, and environmental effects of three online platforms. Craigslist provides an online market for local secondhand goods such as vehicles, furniture, appliances, and electronics. Couchsurfing matches travelers with hosts around the world who welcome guests into their homes. NeighborGoods helps people borrow and lend household goods free of charge. Together these case studies provide an overview of the role of online platforms as future economy initiatives. The economic benefits to these three platforms are significant, and likely to grow over time. Americans posted hundreds of millions of secondhand goods for sale on Craigslist in 2014, increasing access to affordable used goods. Couchsurfing has helped provide its members with millions of nights of free lodging, substantially reducing the cost of travel. While NeighborGoods has not achieved the scale of Craigslist or Couchsurfing, online platforms for sharing household goods could save Americans significant sums of money, especially if they can facilitate widespread ride-sharing and car-sharing. Online platforms may particularly improve the livelihoods of poor Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Sofa, So Good Couchsurfing Ist Nicht Mehr Nur Etwas Für Nomaden Aus Dem Netz
    FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE SONNTAGSZEITUNG, 19. APRIL 2015, NR. 16 REISE V3 Sofa, so good Couchsurfing ist nicht mehr nur etwas für Nomaden aus dem Netz. Aber je größer die Gemeinschaft wird, desto schwieriger die Frage: Wem gehört sie eigentlich? Gegenstand der Diskussion: Findet auf dieser Couch kultureller Austausch statt? Oder ist sie nur ein kostenloser Schlafplatz? Fotos Göring enn es eng wird, lich gehört. Offiziell ist die Ant- der Plattform nicht: Er verglich beantwortete Fragen von Mitglie- weltweit. Andamanen, Feuerland, noch weitaus mehr Anhänger fin- sen auch, wo das Geld für ihre Ide- muss man eben zu- wort einfach: der Couchsurfing In- das junge Unternehmen mit der dern. Über 2500 Couchsurfer will Kamtschatka – es gibt tatsächlich den wird, und unterstützen andere en herkommen soll: aus der Com- sammenrücken. 50 ternational Inc. Das war aber nicht Datenkrake Facebook und nannte er in zehn Jahren in seiner Woh- kaum ein Fleckchen auf der Welt, Non-Profit-Projekte. Ein paar der munity, nicht von Investoren. „Die Menschen sitzen im immer so. Eine Firma ist die die neuen Geschäftsbedingungen nung nur wenige Kilometer von auf dem man nicht mit Couchsur- Gruppe haben schon bei Couchsur- Welt braucht dringend ein Sozia- KreuzbergerW Café „Mano“, kein Wohnbörse erst seit 2011, vorher „inakzeptabel und unzulässig“. Die der Golden Gate Bridge beher- fing Urlaub machen könnte. fing mitprogrammiert, dann beim les Netzwerk, das nicht auf Daten Platz ist mehr frei, an der Bar steht war sie sieben Jahre eine gemein- Community wehrte sich; auf Face- bergt haben – aber er hat keine Die Frage bleibt, ob viele Mit- Nachfolgeprojekt „BeWelcome“.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakalářská Práce
    VYSOKÁ ŠKOLA POLYTECHNICKÁ JIHLAVA CESTOVNÍ RUCH BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE Kateřina Klacková 2016 Couchsurfing versus konkurenční sítě Originální list zadání BP Prohlašuji, že předložená bakalářská práce je původní a zpracoval/a jsem ji samostatně. Prohlašuji, že citace použitých pramenů je úplná, že jsem v práci neporušil/a autorská práva (ve smyslu zákona č. 121/2000 Sb., o právu autorském, o právech souvisejících s právem autorským a o změně některých zákonů, v platném znění, dále též „AZ“). Souhlasím s umístěním bakalářské práce v knihovně VŠPJ a s jejím užitím k výuce nebo k vlastní vnitřní potřebě VŠPJ. Byl/a jsem seznámen/a s tím, že na mou bakalářskou práci se plně vztahuje AZ, zejména § 60 (školní dílo). Beru na vědomí, že VŠPJ má právo na uzavření licenční smlouvy o užití mé bakalářské práce a prohlašuji, že souhlasím s případným užitím mé bakalářské práce (prodej, zapůjčení apod.). Jsem si vědom/a toho, že užít své bakalářské práce či poskytnout licenci k jejímu využití mohu jen se souhlasem VŠPJ, která má právo ode mne požadovat přiměřený příspěvek na úhradu nákladů, vynaložených vysokou školou na vytvoření díla (až do jejich skutečné výše), z výdělku dosaženého v souvislosti s užitím díla či poskytnutím licence. V Jihlavě dne 15. dubna 2016 ………………………………… podpis Ráda bych tímto poděkovala Mgr. Martině Černé, Ph.D., která se ujala vedení mé práce. Velice jí děkuji za její ochotu, trpělivost, cenné rady a připomínky, které mi poskytla během řešení bakalářské práce. Velké díky také patří mé rodině a partnerovi za morální podporu nejen při psaní bakalářské práce, ale i po dobu celého studia. VYSOKÁ ŠKOLA POLYTECHNICKÁ JIHLAVA Katedra cestovního ruchu Couchsurfing versus konkurenční sítě Bakalářská práce Autor: Kateřina Klacková Vedoucí práce: Mgr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Consumption As a Reflection of Self-Identity
    Ethical consumption as a reflection of self-identity Hanna Rahikainen Department of Marketing Hanken School of Economics Helsinki 2015 HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Department of Marketing Type of work: Master’s Thesis Author: Hanna Rahikainen Date: 31.7.2015 Title of thesis: Ethical consumption as a reflection of self-identity Abstract: In recent years, people’s increasing awareness of ethical consumption has become increasingly important for the business environment. Although previous research has shown that consumers are influenced by their ethical concerns, ethical consumption from a consumer perspective lacks understanding. As self-identity is an important concept in explaining how consumers relate to different consumption objects, relating it to ethical consumption is a valuable addition to the existing body of research. As the phenomenon of ethical consumption has been widely studied, but the literature is fragmented covering a wide range of topics such as sustainability and environmental concerns, the theoretical framework of the paper portrays the multifaceted and complex nature of the concepts of ethical consumption and self-identity and the complexities existing in the relationship of consumption and self-identity in general. The present study took a qualitative approach to find out how consumers define what ethical consumption is to them in their own consumption and how self-identity was related to ethical consumption. The informants consisted of eight females between the ages of 25 – 29 living in the capital area of Finland. The results of the study showed an even greater complexity connecting to ethical consumption when researched from a consumer perspective, but indicated clearly the presence of a plurality of identities connected to ethical consumption, portraying it as one of the behavioural modes selected or rejected by an active self.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrepreneurship
    SIG 03 - ENT - Entrepreneurship We invite you to submit your research to explore the theme of The Business of Now: the future starts here for the EURAM 20th Conference. We look forward to receiving your submissions. T03_16 - Sharing Economy: Entrepreneurship, Business Models and Ecosystems Proponents: Djamchid Assadi, Burgundy School of Business BSB, France, djamchid.assadi@bsb- education.com; Asmae DIANI, IRG PARIS EST CRETEIL FRANCE / Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco, [email protected]; Birgit Leick, University College Ostfold, Norway, [email protected]; Guillaume BIOT-PAQUEROT, CEREN, EA 7477, Burgundy School of Business - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France, [email protected]; Anand Kumar Rai, G L Bajaj Institute of Management & Research, India, [email protected]; Julienne Brabet, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), France, [email protected]; Alexandre Asselineau, Burgundy School of Business, France, [email protected]; Arvind ASHTA, CEREN, EA 7477, Burgundy School of Business - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France, [email protected]. Short description: The peer-to-peer Sharing Economy tackles the challenges of inclusiveness by linking peers with idling assets to peers in need of assets. In line with the EURAM 2020, this track promotes the “Business of Now” of Sharing Economy which replaces the utility of possession by utility of disposition to leverage the processes and mechanisms of a future of sustainability. The sharing economy has improves both ecological and economic efficiency to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through promoting collective consumption, shifting choices from ownership to demand-fulfilment, dropping carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions by reducing the resources required.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of the Sharing Economy 2 | Sharing Or Paring? Growth of the Sharing Economy | 3
    www.pwc.com/hu Sharing or paring? Growth of the sharing economy 2 | Sharing or paring? Growth of the sharing economy | 3 Contents Executive summary 5 Main drivers 9 Main features of sharing economy companies 12 Business models 13 A contender for the throne 14 Emergence of the model in certain key sectors 16 I. Mobility industry 16 II. Retail and consumer goods 18 III. Tourism and hotel industry 19 IV. Entertainment, multimedia and telecommunication 20 V. Financial sector 21 VI. Energy sector 22 VII. Human resources sector 23 VIII. Peripheral areas of the sharing economy 24 Like it or lump it 25 What next? 28 About PwC 30 Contact 31 4 | A day in the life of the sharing economy While he does his Yesterday Peter applied for an online Nearby a morning workout, Peter data gathering distance young mother 8:00 listens to his work assignment 12:30 offers her Cardio playlist on Spotify. on TaskRabbit. home cooking So he can via Yummber, 9:15 concentrate better, and Peter jumps he books ofce at the space in the opportunity. Kaptár coworking ofce. On Skillshare, 13:45 16:00 he listens to the Nature Photography On the way home for Beginners course. he stops to pick up the foodstuffs he 15:45 To unwind, he starts ordered last week from watching a lm on Netflix, the shopping community but gets bored of it and reads Szatyorbolt. his book, sourced from A friend shows him Rukkola.hu, instead. a new Hungarian board game under development, on Kickstarter. Next week he’s going on holiday in Italy 18:00 He likes it so much with his girlfriend.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Crossroad of Self, Market and Society
    On the crossroad of Self, Market, and Society By Mihăilescu Vintilă Mihail Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisors: Professor Prem Kumar Rajaram Professor Jakob Rigi CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 On the crossroad of Self, Market, and Society A (n)etnography of Freecycle in Romania By Mihăilescu Vintilă Mihail Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisors: Professor Prem Kumar Rajaram CEU eTD Collection Professor Jakob Rigi Budapest, Hungary 2013 Abstract Somebody offers twenty books on mathematics. Someone else raises the stakes with a Walkman from the pre-digital era. Maybe you need some cat litter or a couch with signs of usage? Or a small counter or skis or clothes or functional or not so functional computers? A multitude of different objects. Why throw away an object when you can give it away as handout? The Freecycle Network comes with a pertinent response. All these offerings of objects do not take place in a mall or in a market somewhere at the end of town. They all happen in your email inbox. And in the inboxes of the other few thousand members of the Freecycle Network in Bucharest. Freecycle is a simple Yahoo group that makes connections between people who have objects for which they do not have a usage anymore and want to get rid of, and people who have a usage, if not even a need for those objects.
    [Show full text]
  • 153469 Master Thesis Georgio
    Master thesis in MSc in Business Administration and Information Systems Georgios Lagoudakos Hand in date: 15-September-2016 Supervisor: Ioanna Constantiou Count (excl. Bibliography, Case Study Data Sources and Appendices): Pages: 78 Characters (with spaces): 181.824 The Evolution of a Sharing Economy Platform: A Case Study about CouchSurfing Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Research Philosophy ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Research Approach ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Research Strategy................................................................................................................................................ 9 Research Choices............................................................................................................................................... 10 Time Horizon ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waving the Banana at Capitalism
    Ethnography http://eth.sagepub.com/ 'Waving the banana' at capitalism: Political theater and social movement strategy among New York's 'freegan' dumpster divers Alex V. Barnard Ethnography 2011 12: 419 DOI: 10.1177/1466138110392453 The online version of this article can be found at: http://eth.sagepub.com/content/12/4/419 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Ethnography can be found at: Email Alerts: http://eth.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://eth.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://eth.sagepub.com/content/12/4/419.refs.html >> Version of Record - Nov 25, 2011 What is This? Downloaded from eth.sagepub.com at UNIV CALIFORNIA BERKELEY LIB on November 30, 2011 Article Ethnography 12(4) 419–444 ‘Waving the banana’ ! The Author(s) 2011 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav at capitalism: Political DOI: 10.1177/1466138110392453 theater and social eth.sagepub.com movement strategy among New York’s ‘freegan’ dumpster divers Alex V. Barnard University of California, Berkeley, USA Abstract This article presents an ethnographic study of ‘freegans’, individuals who use behaviors like dumpster diving for discarded food and voluntary unemployment to protest against environmental degradation and capitalism. While freegans often present their ideology as a totalizing lifestyle which impacts all aspects of their lives, in practice, freegans emphasize what would seem to be the most repellant aspect of their movement: eating wasted food. New Social Movement (NSM) theory would suggest that behaviors like dumpster diving are intended to assert difference and an alternative identity, rather than make more traditional social movement claims.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Gender Equality in the U.S
    GENDER EQUALITY IN THE U.S. Assessing 500 leading companies on workplace equality including healthcare benefits SPECIAL REPORT DECEMBER 2020 Equileap is the leading organisation providing No part of this report may be reproduced data and insights on gender equality in the in any manner without the prior written corporate sector. permission of Equileap. Any commercial use of this material or any part of it will require We research and rank over 3,500 public a licence. Those wishing to commercialise companies around the world using a the use should contact Equileap at info@ unique and comprehensive Gender Equality equileap.com. ScorecardTM across 19 criteria, including the gender balance of the workforce, senior management and board of directors, as well as the pay gap and policies relating to parental leave and sexual harassment. This report was commissioned by the Tara Health Foundation. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................6 GENDER EQUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE.............................................................................7 Key Findings.......................................................................................................................................7 Top 25 Ranking...................................................................................................................................8 Category A / Gender balance in Leadership & Workforce........................................9 Category B /
    [Show full text]
  • Couchsurfing Involvement in Non-Profit Peer-To-Peer Accommodations and Its Impact on Destination Image, Familiarity, and Behavioral Intentions
    This is a repository copy of Couchsurfing involvement in non-profit peer-to-peer accommodations and its impact on destination image, familiarity, and behavioral intentions. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/162828/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Kuhzady, S., Çakici, C., Olya, H. orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-0744 et al. (2 more authors) (2020) Couchsurfing involvement in non-profit peer-to-peer accommodations and its impact on destination image, familiarity, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44. pp. 131-142. ISSN 1447-6770 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.05.002 Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Kuhzadi, S., Çakici, C., Olya, H., Mohajer, B., & Han, H. (2020). Couchsurfing involvement in non- profit peer-to-peer accommodation and its impact on destination Image, familiarity, and behavioral intentions, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 1-13.
    [Show full text]