NEW PATRIOTIC PARTY V ATTORNEY-GENERAL [1993-94] 2 GLR 35—192

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEW PATRIOTIC PARTY V ATTORNEY-GENERAL [1993-94] 2 GLR 35—192 NEW PATRIOTIC PARTY v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [1993-94] 2 GLR 35—192 SUPREME COURT, ACCRA 8 March 1994 ARCHER CJ, ADADE FRANCOIS, ABBAN, AMUA-SEKYI, AIKINS, BAMFORD- ADDO, HAYFRON-BENJAMIN AND AMPIAH JJSC Constitution Law — Constitutional issue — Jurisdiction of Supreme Court — Action against declaration of 31 December as statutory public holiday — Contention by plaintiff that celebration not be financed with public finds and resources — Action not questioning overthrow of government of Third Republic in coup d'etat of 31 December 1981— Whether Supreme Court competent to hear action — Constitution, 1992, Sched 1.s 34(1) and (2). Constitutional law — Constitutional issue — Jurisdiction of Supreme Court — Interpretation of Constitution — Ghanaians granted right to defend constitutional order — Right exercised by seeking interpretation of Constitution — Action by plaintiff for declaration that celebration of 31 December as public holiday with public funds breach of constitution — Whether Supreme Court vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate matter — Constitution, 1992, arts 2 and 3(4). Constitutional law — Constitutional issue — Jurisdiction of Supreme Court — Political question — All issues of constitutional interpretation justiciable by Supreme Court — High Court and chieftaincy tribunals respectively granted, jurisdiction under Constitution over matters with high political content — Constitution essentially political document — Whether Supreme Court to decline jurisdiction on ground case political one. Constitutional law — Constitution, 1992 — Directive Principles of State Policy — Justifiability — No indication within Constitution that principles non-justiciable — Principles not exempted from effect of articles 1(2) and 2(1) which render any law, act or omission inconsistent with any provision of Constitution null and void — Judiciary obliged article 34(1) to be guided by principles when applying or interpreting Constitution — Whether principles justiciable — Constitution, 1992, arts 1(2), 2(1), 34(1) and Chp 6. [p.36] Constitutional law — Constitution, 1992 — Defence of — Celebration of 31 December as statutory public holiday — Article 3(4) vesting Ghanaians with right to defend Constitution — Scope of right — Effect of celebration on people adversely affected by coup d'etat and on resolve of people to resist coups — Whether celebration subverting Constitution — Whether celebration against letter and spirit of Constitution — Claim that celebration for good works, and values, of coup d'etat — Whether constitutional justification for expenditure national resources on it — Whether plaintiff entitled to resist expenditure — Constitution, 1992, arts 3(3), (4)(a) and (b), 41(f) and Sched 1, s 34(2). Constitutional law — Executive and legislative power — Limitation on — Injunction remedy — Supremacy of Constitution — Any law or act inconsistent with any provision of Constitution void — Whether injunction available to restrain President from enforcing or obeying void law — PNDCL 220 declaring 31 December as statutory public holiday and imposing penalties for breach of provision — Action by plaintiff to have declaration by executive of 31 December as statutory public holiday declared unconstitutional — No reference by plaintiff to PNDCL 220 — Provision recognising 31 December as statutory public holiday inconsistent with letter and spirit of Constitution — Whether provision null and void — Constitution, 1992, arts 1(2), 3, 35(1) and 41(f) — Public Holidays Law, 1989 (PNDCL 220), ss 1(1), 5 and Sched. Constitutional law — Executive and legislative power — Limitation on — Government expenditure — Financial estimates in operation before Constitution came into force with any constitutional provision — Financial provision approved by Parliament for celebration of 31 December as statutory public holiday — Celebration unconstitutional — Whether utilisation of public funds for purpose lawful — Constitution, 1992, Sched 1, ss 18, 19 and 36. HEADNOTES On 31 December 1981 the Government of Ghana, duly elected under the Constitution, 1979 was overthrown in a coup d'etat. Subsequently, the military regime which took over the reins of government, the Provisional National Defence Council, declared 31 December a statutory public holiday. Accordingly, each year the anniversary of the coup was celebrated, inter alia, by personnel of the security forces with military parades, route marches and carnivals throughout the country. These activities were financed with public funds. On 7 January 1993 the reign of the PNDC came to an end with the assumption of power by a civilian government which had been elected into office under the Constitution, 1992. When on 19 December 1993 the government announced that 31 December 1993 would be a public holiday and should be celebrated and observed as such, the plaintiff, one of the registered political parties in the country, claiming that the celebration would be unconstitutional, brought an action under article 2(1) of the Constitution 1992 against the Attorney-General for a declaration that the public celebration of the coup d'etat of 31 December out of public funds was inconsistent with or in contravention of the letter and spirit of the Constitution, 1992 particularly articles 3(3)-(7), 35(1) and 41(f) and an order compelling the government to cancel the preparations for the celebration and refrain from carrying out the [p.37] celebration with public funds. In support of the plaintiff's case, it was contended, inter alia, that it was clear from the relevant provisions of the Constitution, 1992 that the people of Ghana had resolved never to allow the Constitution, 1992 to be overthrown or undermined and since the intended celebration would glorify coups d'etat and in the result would undermine the people's resolve to resist coups, it would be unconstitutional. Accordingly, expenditure of public funds on the celebration would constitute waste and misuse of public funds which the Constitution enjoined the people to resist. In his defence on the other hand, the defendant objected to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to entertain the action on the ground that (a) the action sought to question the legality of the coup d'etat of 31 December 1981 contrary to section 34(2) of the transitional provisions of the Constitution, 1992; and (b) the question whether 31 December should be celebrated was a political question which should be reserved to the executive or Parliament to decide. And on the merits, the defendant contended, inter alia, that (i) the celebration of 31 December as a public holiday could not be said to be subverting or overthrowing the Constitution in contravention of article 3(3) as to require any defensive action by anyone under article 3(4); (ii) the Directive Principles of State Policy contained in chapter 6 of the Constitution, 1992 were not justiciable and therefore articles 35 and 41 which were part of the principles could not ground a cause of action; and (iii) 31 December was a statutory public holiday by virtue of the Public Holidays Law, 1989 (PNDCL 220) and moneys were lawfully appropriated under the 1993 budget estimates approved by Parliament for its celebration in recognition of the historical values and good works that the revolution stood for and therefore the intended expenditure was lawful. Held, (Archer CJ, Abban, Bamford-Addo and Ampiah JJSC dissenting): (1) the Supreme Court had jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff's action because (a) The essence of the plaintiff's action was that whatever the nature of the coup d'etat of 31 December 1981, legal or illegal, its anniversary after 7 January 1993, should not be celebrated out of public funds and other resources. Since the action did not relate to the overthrow of the government of the Third Republic or the abrogation of the Constitution, 1979, section 34(2) of the transitional provisions of the Constitution, 1992 which conferred immunity on and freed the persons covered by it from punishment or from paying compensation to anyone did not apply to the case. (b) By virtue of article 3(4) of the Constitution, 1992 every citizen of Ghana had the constitutional right to protect the constitutional order established by the Constitution so that it was not abolished or sought to be abolished. The citizen had to exercise that right by seeking an interpretation as to the meaning and effect of a particular provision or provisions of the Constitution. Since in the [p.38] instant case, the determination of the controversy as to whether the celebration of the 31 December revolution offended the Constitution depended on the interpretation of the Constitution, it raised a justiciable issue which the Supreme Court had jurisdiction under article 2 of the Constitution, 1992 to adjudicate upon and make such orders and give such directions as it might consider appropriate. Tuffuor v Attorney [1980] GLR 637, CA sitting as SC cited. (c) The doctrine of "political question" was inapplicable in Ghana since under articles 1, 2 and 130 of the Constitution, 1992 issues of constitutional interpretation were justiciable by the Supreme Court. Besides, even though questions of human rights invariably had large components of political issues, yet under article 33 of the Constitution, 1992 those questions were reserved in the first instance to the High Court. Similarly even though chieftaincy disputes almost always involved local and often national politics, they were as provided by chapter 22 of the Constitution, 1992 cognisable only by the chieftaincy tribunals in the
Recommended publications
  • Doing Business Guide in EMEIA: Payroll Operations
    Payroll Operations in Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa — essential compliance and reporting considerations Introduction This booklet contains market-by-market newly established, stand-alone guidance1 on key HR payroll matters to operations. Where the EMEIA operation be considered as you expand your is a regional headquarters or a holding operations across EMEIA. company for foreign subsidiaries, or if In our experience, careful consideration there are existing operations in EMEIA, of these matters at the outset is the other considerations must be taken into most effective way of avoiding any account. issues and ensuring an optimal setup In all situations, we recommend that you structure of your business and seek specific professional advice from employees in new EMEIA markets. the contacts listed in each chapter. They This booklet is general in nature and not will take into consideration your specific to be relied on as professional advice. circumstances and objectives. Furthermore, the chapters focus on NB: This guide will work best with Adobe Acrobat Pro. 1 This information was compiled in July 2019. 2 Payroll Operations in Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa — essential compliance and reporting considerations EY contacts Payroll Operate Services Sheri Sullivan Michael Van Den Brand EY Global Payroll Operate Leader EY EMEIA Payroll Operate Leader T: +17168435050 T: +34 933 666 340 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Country Payroll leader Email address Armenia Kamo Karapetyan [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Incentive Based Collection of E-Waste in Ghana
    Incentive Based Collection of E-Waste in Ghana Findings from the pilot incentive system for waste cables from March 2018 to August 2019 Incentive based collection of e-waste in Ghana | As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH P.O. Box KA 9698 7 Volta Street Airport Residential Area Accra I Ghana T +233-302-760-448 F +233-302-777-375 E [email protected] I www.giz.de Programme/project description: Environmentally Sound Disposal and Recycling of E-waste in Ghana (E-Waste project) Airport Residential Area Accra – Ghana Head of Programme: Markus Spitzbart https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/63039.html Author: Andreas Manhart (Oeko-Institut e.V.), Freiburg, Germany Bennett Akuffo (GreenAd), Accra, Ghana Kweku Attafuah-Wadee (GreenAd), Accra, Ghana Sampson Atiemo (MRI), Accra, Ghana Alexander Batteiger (GIZ), Accra, Ghana Johanna Jacobs (Oeko-Institut e.V.), Freiburg, Germany Nana Osei (GreenAd), Accra, Ghana Editor: Alexander Batteiger, (GIZ), Accra, Ghana Design/Layout: Jude Agboada (Peps Springs), Accra Photo credits/sources: Main text: Source given next to image Cover Pager: First four rows (GIZ/Veronika Johannes); lowest row left to right (GIZ/ Markus Spitzbart, GIZ/Alexander Batteiger, GreenAD, City Waste Recycling) 2 | Incentive based collection of e-waste in Ghana URL links: This publication contains links to external websites. Responsibility for the content of the listed external sites always lies with their respective publishers. When the links to these sites were first posted, GIZ checked the third-party content to establish whether it could give rise to civil or criminal liability.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Coast Organising and Decent Work Conditions Among
    © University of Cape Coast https://erl.ucc.edu.gh/jspui UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST ORGANISING AND DECENT WORK CONDITIONS AMONG INFORMAL STONE QUARRY WORKERS IN GHANA MOSES SEGBENYA 2019 Digitized by Sam Jonah Library © University of Cape Coast https://erl.ucc.edu.gh/jspui ©Moses Segbenya University of Cape Coast ii Digitized by Sam Jonah Library © University of Cape Coast https://erl.ucc.edu.gh/jspui UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST ORGANISING AND DECENT WORK CONDITIONS AMONG INFORMAL STONE QUARRY WORKERS IN GHANA BY MOSES SEGBENYA Thesis submitted to the Department of Integrated Development Studies of the School for Development Studies, College of Humanities and Legal Studies, University of Cape Coast, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy degree in Development Studies MAY 2019 ii Digitized by Sam Jonah Library © University of Cape Coast https://erl.ucc.edu.gh/jspui DECLARATION Candidate’s Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis is the result of my own original research and that no part of it has been presented for another degree in this university or elsewhere. Candidate’s Signature: …………………………. Date: ……………………. Name:…………………………………………………. Supervisors’ Declaration We hereby declare that the preparation and presentation of the thesis were supervised in accordance with the guidelines on supervision of thesis laid down by the University of Cape Coast. Principal Supervisor’s Signature: ……………… Date: ……………… Name:…………………………………………….. Co Supervisor’s Signature ……………………… Date: ……………… Name:………………………………………………. ii Digitized by Sam Jonah Library © University of Cape Coast https://erl.ucc.edu.gh/jspui ABSTRACT Informal workers as active agents could use collective identity as a means to achieve better working conditions for themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Supreme Court in the Development of Constitutional Law in Ghana
    THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN GHANA by SETH YEBOA BIMPONG-BUTA i THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN GHANA by SETH YEBOA BIMPONG-BUTA Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LAW – LLD at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA PROMOTER PROFESSOR B P WANDA 1 February 2005 ii ABSTRACT The Theme running through this Dissertation is intended to prove that the Supreme Court has a role to play in the promotion, enforcement and sustenance of a proper democratic system of government, good governance and fundamental human rights and freedoms in Ghana. The Study would therefore address the role of the Supreme Court in the development of Constitutional Law in Ghana, with particular emphasis on the court’s contribution to the underlying concepts of the Fourth Republican Constitution of 1992; the guiding principles of constitutional interpretation and the vexed issue of whether the court should adopt a mechanical and literal approach to the interpretation of the Constitution or adopt a liberal, beneficent and purposive approach. The Supreme Court has asserted in the locus classicus decision: Tuffuor v Attorney-General [1980] GLR 637 that the 1979 Constitution as the supreme law, must be construed as a living political document capable of growth. Is there any evidence now to support that claim? The study shall also investigate the question of the power of the Supreme Court to review legislative and executive action. We shall also examine the role of the Supreme Court in the interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms in relation to the rights and obligations of the individual and the State with the view to achieving good governance.
    [Show full text]
  • KWAHU CULTURAL VALUES-CONTENTS.Pdf
    Kwahu Cultural Values: Their Impact On The People’s Art BY Emmanuel Yaw Adonteng (BE.D. IN ART) A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in African Art And Culture on July, 2009. July, 2009 © 2009 Department of General Art Studies DECLARATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work towards the MA (African Art and Culture) and that, to the best of my knowledge, it contains no materials previously published by another person nor material which has been accepted for the i award of any other degree of the University except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text EMMANUEL YAW ADONTENG ( 20045462) ………………………………………….…….. ……………… ………… Student Name & ID Signature Date Certified by: DR. O. OSEI AGYEMANG ………………………………………….. ……………… ………… Supervisor‟s Name Signature Date Certified by: DR. JOE ADU-AGYEM ………………………………………….. ……………… ………… Head of Dept Name Signature Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I express my gratitude to God Almighty for the love, kindness and protection accorded me and also enabling me to write this thesis. I also want to extend my heartfelt gratitude and appreciation to those who extended the love ii and support needed most in making this thesis a reality. I also register my sincere thanks to the authors whose books and articles I cited as sources of references. My utmost thanks go to Dr Opamshen Osei Agyeman, my supervisor and a lecturer of the college of Art, KNUST, KUMASI for his assistance, guidance and encouragement. I am grateful to Dr Ben K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana @ 60: Governance and Human Rights in Twenty-First Century Africa
    GHANA @ 60: GOVERNANCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AFRICA Edited by Michael Addaney & Michael Gyan Nyarko 2017 Ghana @ 60: Governance and human rights in twenty-first century Africa Published by: Pretoria University Law Press (PULP) The Pretoria University Law Press (PULP) is a publisher at the Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria, South Africa. PULP endeavours to publish and make available innovative, high-quality scholarly texts on law in Africa. PULP also publishes a series of collections of legal documents related to public law in Africa, as well as text books from African countries other than South Africa. This book was peer reviewed prior to publication. For more information on PULP, see www.pulp.up.ac.za Printed and bound by: BusinessPrint, Pretoria To order, contact: PULP Faculty of Law University of Pretoria South Africa 0002 Tel: +27 12 420 4948 Fax: +27 86 610 6668 [email protected] www.pulp.up.ac.za Cover: Yolanda Booyzen, Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria ISBN: 978-1-920538-74-3 © 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments v Foreword vi Abbreviations and acronyms viii Contributors xii List of laws xviii List of cases xxi PART I: INTRODUCTION Governance and human rights in twenty-first 1 century Africa: An introductory appraisal 2 Michael Addaney & Michael Gyan Nyarko PART II: GHANA AT 60 – HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSOLIDATION OF GOOD GOVERNANCE IN A CHALLENGING ERA By accountants and vigilantes: The role of 2 individual actions in the Ghanaian Supreme Court 16 Kenneth NO Ghartey Electoral justice under Ghana’s
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana Presentation
    A SHORT PRESENTATION ABOUT OUR MOTHERLAND, GHANA. Presented by; Benjamin,Rahmatu and Gabriel. Our National Anthem MAP OF AFRICA AND GHANA A NATURAL STONE IN A FORMATION OF AFRICA MAP IN BUNKPURUGU First President of Ghana Current president of Ghana • Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah • His Excellency Nana Addo Danquah Akuffo-Addo This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC Ghana flag MEANINING OF GHANA FLAG COLOURS RED: The red symbolizes the bloodshed and struggles for independence YELLOW/GOLD: It symbolizes the country’s minerals wealth GREEN: It symbolizes the country’s forest and natural wealth BLACK STAR: Symbolizes Africa Emancipation • Ghana was colonized by; • The British till 1957 BRIEF HISTORY OF GHANA MORE ABOUT GHANA • Gained independence on 6th March 1957 • Located in West Africa • Capital is Accra • Official language is English ( over 70 local languages) • Currency is cedi (¢) • Three Major Religion: Christianity, Islam and African traditional religion (ATR) • Population is 31,732,129 million ( 2020) • Current president is Nana Addo Dankwa Akoffu Addo • Ghana has sixteen regions and 216 districts • Motto of Ghana is freedom and justice • Over 70 tribes( largest Akan) • GHANA IS THE 1ST BLACK AFRICAN NATION TO GAIN INDEPENDENCE FROM COLONIAL RULE. PUBLIC HOLIDAYS IN GHANA • New year January 1 • Independence day March • Worker's day May 1 • African union day May 25 • Republic day July 1 • Founders' day September 21 • Farmer's day : first Friday of every December •
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report Ghana May 2019
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Country Report Ghana Generated on May 13th 2019 Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square London E14 4QW United Kingdom _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For 60 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square The Economist Group London 750 Third Avenue E14 4QW 5th Floor United Kingdom New York, NY 10017, US Tel: +44 (0) 20 7576 8181 Tel: +1 212 541 0500 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7576 8476 Fax: +1 212 586 0248 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Hong Kong Geneva The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 1301 Cityplaza Four Rue de l’Athénée 32 12 Taikoo Wan Road 1206 Geneva Taikoo Shing Switzerland Hong Kong Tel: +852 2585 3888 Tel: +41 22 566 24 70 Fax: +852 2802 7638 Fax: +41 22 346 93 47 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] This report can be accessed electronically as soon as it is published by visiting store.eiu.com or by contacting a local sales representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Festivals & Events in Aripo Member States
    CULTURAL FESTIVALS & EVENTS IN ARIPO MEMBER STATES 2019 2019 ISBN: 978-1-77929-566-8 Copyright © 2019 by ARIPO. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the copyright legislation of an ARIPO Member State, as the case may be, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form, or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the ARIPO Office. Any correspondence on copyright and other issues contained in this publication should be addressed to: The Director General, ARIPO Office, No. 11 Natal Road, Belgravia, P.O. Box 4228, HARARE. Zimbabwe. ISBN: 978-1-77929-566-8 CULTURAL FESTIVALS & EVENTS IN ARIPO MEMBER STATES ARIPO Harare, Zimbabwe 2019 FOREWORD It is with great delight that we present the first report on the Cultural festivals and events within ARIPO Member States. Since the inclusion of copyright and related rights in the mandate of the Organization in 2002, ARIPO has been working with its Member States with the aim of creating national environments that promote and provide effective protection, management and enforcement of copyright and related rights in the respective Member States. Under the strategies to consider in awareness raising programs, the government through the national copyright office needs to play a leading role in raising awareness on copyright and Intellectual Property rights. This would require devising strategies that leverage and take advantage of information and communication technology to disseminate information for outreach and advocacy. With that in mind, creativity can be linked with culture in a bid to raise copyright awareness, Culture can be used as a vehicle for information dissemination about the need to protect and respect copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report Ghana September 2019
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Country Report Ghana Generated on September 13th 2019 Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square London E14 4QW United Kingdom _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For 60 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square The Economist Group London 750 Third Avenue E14 4QW 5th Floor United Kingdom New York, NY 10017, US Tel: +44 (0) 20 7576 8181 Tel: +1 212 541 0500 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7576 8476 Fax: +1 212 586 0248 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Hong Kong Geneva The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 1301 Cityplaza Four Rue de l’Athénée 32 12 Taikoo Wan Road 1206 Geneva Taikoo Shing Switzerland Hong Kong Tel: +852 2585 3888 Tel: +41 22 566 24 70 Fax: +852 2802 7638 Fax: +41 22 346 93 47 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] This report can be accessed electronically as soon as it is published by visiting store.eiu.com or by contacting a local sales representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Brokers of Modernity Berliner Beiträge Zur Ethnologie Band 30 Tina Heinze
    Tina Heinze • Brokers of Modernity Berliner Beiträge zur Ethnologie Band 30 Tina Heinze BROKERS OF MODERNITY Life Stories of Educated Muslims in Ghana, 1935–2005 Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über www.d-nb.de abruf bar. Als Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades eines Dr. Phil., vorgelegt dem Fachbereich 07 Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz von Tina Heinze aus Berlin, Mainz 2010 Referent: Prof. Dr. Thomas Bierschenk Korreferentin: Prof. Dr. Carola Lentz Gedruckt auf holz- und säurefreiem Papier, 100 % chlorfrei gebleicht. ©Weißensee Verlag, Berlin 2013 www.weissensee-verlag.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten Printed in Germany ISSN 1610-6768 ISBN 978-3-89998-207-7 Contents Map of Ghana ....................................................... 7 Introduction ........................................................ 9 Muslims in Ghana .................................................... 13 Chapter One: Methodological and Theoretical Reflections .......... 17 Change of Discipline: From History to Anthropology ...................... 17 Modification of Topic: From Institution to Generation .................... 21 Adjustment of Method: From Participant Observation to Biographical Interview .............................................. 22 Chapter Two: Historical Overview on Muslims and Education in West Africa ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Power Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: Determinants of Success
    CHAPTER 2 1 Independent Power Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: Determinants of Success Anton Eberhard and Katharine Nawal Gratwick t the beginning of the 1990s, virtually all major had the potential to benchmark state-owned supply to power generation providers in Sub-Saharan gradually introduce competition (APEC Energy Working Africa were financed by public coffers, including Group 1997). cAoncessiona ry loans from development finance institutions In 1994 Côte d’Ivoire became one of the first African (DFIs). These publicly financed power generation assets countries to attract a foreign-led IPP to sell power to the were considered one of the core elements of state-owned, national grid under long-term contracts with the state util- vertically integrated power systems. A confluence of fac- ity. Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda, tors, however, brought about a significant change in the among others, opened their doors to foreign and local ensuing years. investors in their power sectors shortly thereafter. With insufficient public funds for new power generation Although IPPs were considered part of larger power sec- and decades of poor performance by state-run utilities, tor reform programs in Sub-Saharan Africa, the reforms African countries began to adopt a new model for their were not far-reaching. In most cases, state utilities remained power systems, influenced by pioneering reformers in vertically integrated and maintained a dominant share of Chile, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United the power generation market, while private investors were States.1 Urged on by multilateral and bilateral develop- allowed to operate only on the margin of the sector.2 Policy ment institutions, which were withdrawing funding from frameworks and regulatory regimes, necessary to maintain a state-owned projects, a number of countries adopted competitive environment, were limited.
    [Show full text]