DOCSLIB.ORG

Hains Tech Report for Lithium Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hains Tech Report for Lithium Project HAINS ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE PANAMINT VALLEY LITHIUM PROJECT, PANAMINT VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for BATTERY MINERAL RESOURCES LIMITED Report for NI 43-101 Effective Date: November 16, 2017 Qualified Person: Donald H. Hains, P.Geo. March 25, 2018 Hains Engineering Company Limited Report Control Form Document Title Technical Report on the Panamint Valley Lithium Project, Panamint Valley, California Client Name & Address Battery Mineral Resources Limited Level 36, Governor Philip Tower, 1 Farrar Place Sydney NSW 2000, Australia Document Reference Status & Project #17-011 Issue No. Version 2 Issue Date March 25, 2018 Lead Author Don Hains (name) (signature & date) Peer Reviewer (name) (signature & date) Project Manager Approval (name) (signature & date) Project Director Approval (name) (signature & date) Report Distribution Name No. of Copies Client 1 pdf Hains Engineering Filing 1 (project box) Hains Engineering Company Limited 2275 lakeshore Blvd. West, Suite 515 Toronto, Ontario M8V 3Y3 Canada Tel: +1 416 971-9783 Fax: +1 416 971-9812 [email protected] HAINS ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Technical Summary .................................................................................................. 1-4 2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 2-1 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ........................................................................... 3-1 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS AND LOCATIONS ..................................................... 4-1 5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................ 5-1 6 HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 6-1 7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION ................................................... 7-1 8 DEPOSIT TYPES ...................................................................................................... 8-1 9 EXPLORATION ......................................................................................................... 9-1 10 DRILLING .............................................................................................................. 10-1 11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ..................................... 11-1 12 DATA VERIFICATION ........................................................................................... 12-1 13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ............................... 13-1 14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE ....................................................................... 14-1 15 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE .......................................................................... 15-1 16 MINING METHODS .............................................................................................. 16-1 17 RECOVERY METHODS ....................................................................................... 17-1 18 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................ 18-1 19 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS................................................................ 19-1 20 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT ..................................................................................................................... 20-1 21 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS .................................................................... 21-1 22 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 22-1 23 ADJACENT PROPERTIES ................................................................................... 23-1 24 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION ................................................. 24-1 25 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................ 25-1 Battery Minerals Resources Limited Technical Report NI 43-101 – March 25, 2018 Page i HAINS ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED 26 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 26-1 27 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 27-1 28 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................ 28-1 29 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON ............................................................. 29-1 30 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................... 30-1 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1-1:Recommended Exploration Budget – Panamint Valley Property1 ............................... 1-3 Table 5.1: Average monthly temperatures and precipitation data from Trona, California........... 5-2 Table 11-1: Panamint Valley Sampling by BMR – Rock Samples ............................................ 11-1 Table 11-2: Panamint Valley Sampling by BMR – Water Samples .......................................... 11-2 Table 11-3: BMR Sample Assay Results – Rock Samples ........................................................ 11-5 Table 11-3 cont’d: BMR Panamint Sample Assays – Water Samples ....................................... 11-6 Table 12-1: Due Diligence Samples – Assay Methods .............................................................. 12-1 Table 12-2: Due Diligence Sample Assay Results ..................................................................... 12-2 Table 19-1: Key Attributes of Brine and Hard Rock Lithium Deposits ..................................... 19-1 Table 19-2: New Vehicle Build by Engine Type ....................................................................... 19-5 Table 19-3: Global Mine Production of Lithium by Company - 2015 ....................................... 19-6 Table 26-1: Exploration Budget1 – Panamint Property .............................................................. 26-1 Battery Minerals Resources Limited Technical Report NI 43-101 – March 25, 2018 Page ii HAINS ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1-1: Property Location Map ............................................................................................ 1-45 Figure 2-1: BMR Corporate Structure .......................................................................................... 2-1 Figure 4-1: Panamint Property Location Map .............................................................................. 4-2 Figure 4-2: Panamint Property Claim Map 4-3 Figure 7-1: Panamint Regional Geology ...................................................................................... 7-2 Figure 7-2: Pleistocene Drainage Systems in Owens Lake – Death Valley Region .................... 7-4 Figure 7-3: Late Cenozoic Deformation in Central Panamint Valley .......................................... 7-5 Figure 7-4: Panamint Valley Major Structural Features .............................................................. 7-7 Figure 7-5: Schematic diagrams showing slip directions and fault interactions for the Searles Valley, Manly Pass, Panamint Valley, and Ash Hill fault zones. .............................................. 7-10 Figure 7-6: Panamint Property Geology ..................................................................................... 7-12 Figure 7-7: Cross Section A-A’ and B-B’ across Panamint Valley property ............................. 7-14 Figure 7-8: USGS Drill Holes in Owens Lake – Panamint Valley Region ................................ 7-15 Figure 7-9: USGS Panamint Valley Drill Logs .......................................................................... 7-17 Figure 8-1: Schematic Deposit Model for Lithium Brines ........................................................... 8-2 Figure 8-2: Clayton Valley Lithium Brine Deposit Model ......................................................... 8-4 Figure 8-3: Clayton Valley Geology ............................................................................................ 8-5 Figure 9-1: Gravity Survey Coverage – Panamint Valley Property ............................................. 9-2 Figure 9-2: Intrepreted Faults Based on Gravity Survey – Panamnit Project .............................. 9-3 Figure 9-3: Intrepreatted Horst blocks based on gravity survey – panamint project .................... 9-4 Figure 9-4: Intrepreted sub-surface Drainage pattern based on gravity survy – Panamint ......... 9-5 Figure 11-1: Panamint Valley Sample and Drill Hole Locations .............................................. 11-4 Figure 19.1: Lithium Supply by Country and Forecast Supply to 2025 ..................................... 19-2 Figure 19.2: Global Lithium Demand – 2013 – 2025 ................................................................ 19-3 Figure 19.3: Electric Vehicle Demand to 2025 .......................................................................... 19-5 Battery Minerals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Climate of Death Valley, California
    THE CLIMATE OF DEATH VALLEY, CALIFORNIA BY STEVEN ROOF AND CHARLIE CALLAGAN The notoriously extreme climate of Death Valley records shows significant variability in the long-term, including a 35% increase in precipitation in the last 40 years. eath Valley National Park, California, is widely known for its extreme hot and Ddry climate. High summer temperatures, low humidity, high evaporation, and low pre- cipitation characterize the valley, of which over 1300 km2 (500 mi2) are below sea level (Fig. 1). The extreme summer climate attracts great interest: July and August visitation in Death Valley National Park has doubled in the last 10 years. From June through August, the average temperature at Furnace Creek, Death Valley [54 m (177 ft) below sea level] is 98°F (37°C).1 Daytime high temperatures typically exceed 90°F (32°C) more than half of the year, and temperatures above 120°F (49°C) occur 1 Weather data are reported here in their original units in to order retain the original level of precision re- corded by the observers. FIG. I. Location map of the Death Valley region. Death Valley National Park is outlined in blue, main roads shown in red, and the portion of the park below sea level is highlighted in white. AFFILIATIONS: ROOF—School of Natural Science, Hampshire E-mail: [email protected] College, Amherst, Massachusetts; CALLAGAN—National Park Service, DOI: 10.1 175/BAMS-84-12-1725 Death Valley National Park, Death Valley, California. In final form 17 January 2003 CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Steve Roof, School of Natural © 2003 American Meteorological Society Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA 01002 AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY DECEMBER 2003 BAfft I 1725 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/09/21 10:14 PM UTC 5-20 times each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    Technical Memorandum DATE: July 3, 2019 PROJECT: 19-1-047 TO: Shawnda Grady, ESQ Ellison, Schneider, Harris & Donlan FROM: Eddy Teasdale, P.G., CHG. Mehrdad Bastani SUBJECT: Ground Water (Hydrologic) Technical Memorandum Report to Support San Bernardino Conditional Use Permit Related to Adequate Service Certification Water and Sewer (Form W2) - PVL Lime Plant APN: 0485-031-12 1 INTRODUCTION This Technical Memorandum (TM) describes the process used to determine groundwater availability and evaluate potential impacts of operating a new planned industrial well on existing groundwater users in the area. Provided herein are the key findings, conclusions, and preliminary recommendations regarding water availability for the proposed PVL processing plant in Trona, California (Project). Implementation of the Project will utilize water from a recently installed on-site production well. For drinking water, the Project proposed to utilize an estimated 1.3 gallons per minute (gpm). To meet operational requirements related to domestic and processing usage, the new planned well will need to produce a maximum of 30 gpm (49 AF/year). 2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY Searles Valley is a north-trending structural valley that is bound by the Argus Range on the west and north and by the Slate Range on the north and east. The Garlock Fault is generally recognized as the southern limit of the groundwater basin, however topographically, the surface water drainage area of the valley continues south of the Garlock fault. The area of the Searles Valley drainage basin is estimated to be about 693 square miles. There are three primary hydrogeologic units within the Searles Valley, alluvial deposits, saline deposits and bedrock complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Boiler 26 SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS
    SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS — TRONA, ARGUS and WESTEND FACILITY MDAQMD Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 MOJAVE DESERT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 For: SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS OPERATIONS, INC. Facility: TRONA, ARGUS, AND WESTEND (FACILITIES) Renewed Pursuant to MDAQMD Regulation XII Effective Date: March 14, 2017 This Federal Operating Permit Expires On: March 14, 2022 Issued By: Br., Poiriez Executive Director 14306 PARK AVENUE, VICTORVILLE, CALIFORNIA 92392 PHONE (760) 245-1661 FAX (760) 245-2022 SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS – TRONA, ARGUS and WESTEND FACILITY MDAQMD Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 PERMIT REVISIONS This Federal Operating Permit (FOP) is renewed pursuant to Regulation XII- Federal Operating Permits. See Statement of Legal and Factual Basis for a summary of items related to this FOP renewal and an explanation of pertinent applicability determinations made to this FOP during renewal. 2 SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS – TRONA, ARGUS and WESTEND FACILITY MDAQMD Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Permit Revisions ......................................................................................................2 Part I Introductory Information ...................................................................................... I-4 Part II Applicable Requirements and Emissions Limitations .........................................II-9 Part III Monitoring, Recordkeeping, Reporting and Testing Requirements ................ III-32 Part IV Standard Federal Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Neogene Stratigraphy and Tectonics of Death Valley — a Review
    Earth-Science Reviews 73 (2005) 245–270 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Upper Neogene stratigraphy and tectonics of Death Valley — a review J.R. Knott a,*, A.M. Sarna-Wojcicki b, M.N. Machette c, R.E. Klinger d aDepartment of Geological Sciences, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834, United States bU. S. Geological Survey, MS 975, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States cU. S. Geological Survey, MS 966, Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225-0046, United States dTechnical Service Center, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, P. O. Box 25007, D-8530, Denver, CO 80225-0007, United States Abstract New tephrochronologic, soil-stratigraphic and radiometric-dating studies over the last 10 years have generated a robust numerical stratigraphy for Upper Neogene sedimentary deposits throughout Death Valley. Critical to this improved stratigraphy are correlated or radiometrically-dated tephra beds and tuffs that range in age from N3.58 Ma to b1.1 ka. These tephra beds and tuffs establish relations among the Upper Pliocene to Middle Pleistocene sedimentary deposits at Furnace Creek basin, Nova basin, Ubehebe–Lake Rogers basin, Copper Canyon, Artists Drive, Kit Fox Hills, and Confidence Hills. New geologic formations have been described in the Confidence Hills and at Mormon Point. This new geochronology also establishes maximum and minimum ages for Quaternary alluvial fans and Lake Manly deposits. Facies associated with the tephra beds show that ~3.3 Ma the Furnace Creek basin was a northwest–southeast-trending lake flanked by alluvial fans. This paleolake extended from the Furnace Creek to Ubehebe. Based on the new stratigraphy, the Death Valley fault system can be divided into four main fault zones: the dextral, Quaternary-age Northern Death Valley fault zone; the dextral, pre-Quaternary Furnace Creek fault zone; the oblique–normal Black Mountains fault zone; and the dextral Southern Death Valley fault zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources and Mineral Resource Potential of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas Inyo County, California
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resources and mineral resource potential of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas Inyo County, California Chester T. Wrucke, Sherman P. Marsh, Gary L. Raines, R. Scott Werschky, Richard J. Blakely, and Donald B. Hoover U.S. Geological Survey and Edward L. McHugh, Clay ton M. Rumsey, Richard S. Gaps, and J. Douglas Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 84-560 Prepared by U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines for U.S. Bureau of Land Management This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resources and mineral resource potential of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas Inyo County, California by Chester T. Wrucke, Sherman P. Marsh, Gary L. Raines, R. Scott Werschky, Richard J. Blakely, and Donald B. Hoover U.S. Geological Survey and Edward L. McHugh, Clayton M. Rumsey, Richard S. Gaps, and J. Douglas Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 84-560 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1984 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1. Mineral resource potential map of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas, Inyo County, California................................ In pocket Figure 1. Map showing location of Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas, California.............. 39 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS CHAPTER II.4
    Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS CHAPTER II.4. ALTERNATIVE 1 II.4 ALTERNATIVE 1 Alternative 1 is one of five action alternatives considered and analyzed in the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP or Plan) and Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS). The description of Alternative 1 is first provided at an interagency level (Section II.4.1), which describes all Plan elements of the alternative. After the interagency description, the individual elements of the alternative are described, including the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) elements of the DRECP (Section II.4.2), the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) elements of the DRECP (Section II.4.3), and the General Conservation Plan (GCP) elements of the DRECP (Section II.4.4). II.4.1 Interagency Description of Alternative 1 The interagency description of Alternative 1 includes the following main sections: Overview of Alternative 1, Conservation Strategy, Monitoring and Adaptive Management Program, Description of the Covered Activities, and Plan Implementation. The description of Alternative 1 for the DRECP and EIR/EIS encompasses the overall conservation strategy and description of Covered Activities on federal and nonfederal lands (i.e., state, county, city, and privately owned lands) within the Plan Area. II.4.1.1 Overview of Alternative 1 The following provides a Plan-wide overview of Alternative 1. Alternative 1 integrates the renewable energy and resource conservation with other existing uses in the Plan Area and includes BLM LUPA elements, NCCP elements, and GCP elements. Under Alternative 1 for the DRECP, an interagency conservation strategy for the Plan Area would be established that includes a streamlined process for the permitting of renewable energy and transmission development on both federal and nonfederal lands and a BLM LUPA providing Conservation and Management Actions (CMAs) for resources throughout the Plan Area on BLM-administered lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest and the Panamint Shoshone (E.G., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934)
    109 VyI. NOTES ON BOUNDARIES AND CULTURE OF THE PANAMINT SHOSHONE AND OWENS VALLEY PAIUTE * Gordon L. Grosscup Boundary of the Panamint The Panamint Shoshone, also referred to as the Panamint, Koso (Coso) and Shoshone of eastern California, lived in that portion of the Basin and Range Province which extends from the Sierra Nevadas on the west to the Amargosa Desert of eastern Nevada on the east, and from Owens Valley and Fish Lake Valley in the north to an ill- defined boundary in the south shared with Southern Paiute groups. These boundaries will be discussed below. Previous attempts to define the Panamint Shoshone boundary have been made by Kroeber (1925), Steward (1933, 1937, 1938, 1939 and 1941) and Driver (1937). Others, who have worked with some of the groups which border the Panamint Shoshone, have something to say about the common boundary between the group of their special interest and the Panamint Shoshone (e.g., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934). Kroeber (1925: 589-560) wrote: "The territory of the westernmost member of this group [the Shoshone], our Koso, who form as it were the head of a serpent that curves across the map for 1, 500 miles, is one of the largest of any Californian people. It was also perhaps the most thinly populated, and one of the least defined. If there were boundaries, they are not known. To the west the crest of the Sierra has been assumed as the limit of the Koso toward the Tubatulabal. On the north were the eastern Mono of Owens River.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Valley National Park
    COMPLIMENTARY $3.95 2019/2020 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ACTIVITIES • SIGHTSEEING • DINING • LODGING TRAILS • HISTORY • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS T:5.375” S:4.75” PLAN YOUR VISIT WELCOME S:7.375” In T:8.375” 1994, Death Valley National SO TASTY EVERYONE WILL WANT A BITE. Monument was expanded by 1.3 million FUN FACTS acres and redesignated a national park by the California Desert Protection Act. Established: Death Valley became a The largest national park below Alaska, national monument in 1933 and is famed this designation helped focus protection for being the hottest, lowest and driest on one the most iconic landscapes in the location in the country. The parched world. In 2018 nearly 1.7 million people landscape rises into snow-capped mountains and is home to the Timbisha visited the park, a new visitation record. Shoshone people. Death Valley is renowned for its colorful Land Area: The park’s 3.4 million acres and complex geology. Its extremes of stretch across two states, California and elevation support a great diversity of life Nevada. and provide a natural geologic museum. Highest Elevation: The top of This region is the ancestral homeland Telescope Peak is 11,049 feet high. The of the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe. The lowest is -282 feet at Badwater Basin. Timbisha established a life in concert Plants and Animals: Death Valley with nature. is home to 51 mammal species, 307 Ninety-three percent of the park is bird species, 36 reptile species, two designated wilderness, providing unique amphibian species and five fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Open-File/Color For
    Questions about Lake Manly’s age, extent, and source Michael N. Machette, Ralph E. Klinger, and Jeffrey R. Knott ABSTRACT extent to form more than a shallow n this paper, we grapple with the timing of Lake Manly, an inconstant lake. A search for traces of any ancient lake that inundated Death Valley in the Pleistocene upper lines [shorelines] around the slopes Iepoch. The pluvial lake(s) of Death Valley are known col- leading into Death Valley has failed to lectively as Lake Manly (Hooke, 1999), just as the term Lake reveal evidence that any considerable lake Bonneville is used for the recurring deep-water Pleistocene lake has ever existed there.” (Gale, 1914, p. in northern Utah. As with other closed basins in the western 401, as cited in Hunt and Mabey, 1966, U.S., Death Valley may have been occupied by a shallow to p. A69.) deep lake during marine oxygen-isotope stages II (Tioga glacia- So, almost 20 years after Russell’s inference of tion), IV (Tenaya glaciation), and/or VI (Tahoe glaciation), as a lake in Death Valley, the pot was just start- well as other times earlier in the Quaternary. Geomorphic ing to simmer. C arguments and uranium-series disequilibrium dating of lacus- trine tufas suggest that most prominent high-level features of RECOGNITION AND NAMING OF Lake Manly, such as shorelines, strandlines, spits, bars, and tufa LAKE MANLY H deposits, are related to marine oxygen-isotope stage VI (OIS6, In 1924, Levi Noble—who would go on to 128-180 ka), whereas other geomorphic arguments and limited have a long and distinguished career in Death radiocarbon and luminescence age determinations suggest a Valley—discovered the first evidence for a younger lake phase (OIS 2 or 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Death Valley Springs Geochemical Investigation Yucca Mountain Nuclear Repository, Inyo County Oversight-1998
    The HYDRODYNAMICS Group studies in mass and energy transport in the earth Death Valley Springs Geochemical Investigation Yucca Mountain Nuclear Repository, Inyo County Oversight-1998 Submitted to: Inyo County Planning Department: Yucca Mountain Repository Oversight Program March, 1999 Michael J. King, R.G., C.HG. John D. Bredehoeft, Ph.D., NAE The HYDRODYNAMICS Group 16711 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, WA 98026 Phone (425) 787-6728, Fax (425) 742-8493 Page 1 The Hydrodynamics Group DEATH VALLEY SPRINGS GEOCHMICAL INVESTIGATION YUCCA MOUNTAIN NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY, INYO COUNTY OVERSIGHT-1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Yucca Mountain, Nevada is under study as the site of the only proposed high-level nuclear waste repository in the United States. The repository concept uses the philosophy of multiple barriers, both engineered and natural, each of which impedes the movement of radionuclides into the accessible environment. The proposed repository would be in the unsaturated zone in Tertiary tuffaceous rocks. The principal transporting mechanism for radionuclides is moving ground water. Underlying the repository is an extensive Lower Carbonate Aquifer known to be highly permeable. Inyo County, as an affected unit of local government under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, as amended, is concerned with the connections between the Lower Carbonate Aquifer underlying Yucca Mountain and the carbonate sources of waters in Inyo County, especially the Death Valley region. This report is a summary of the investigations conducted by Inyo County’s consultants, the Hydrodynamics Group, during calendar year 1998. This report presents the results of The Hydrodynamics Group’s 1998 collection of water samples from 23 springs and 2 creeks in Death Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 As Amended
    the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as amended U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Desert District Riverside, California the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as Amended IN REPLY REFER TO United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT STATE OFFICE Federal Office Building 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Dear Reader: Thank you.You and many other interested citizens like you have made this California Desert Conservation Area Plan. It was conceived of your interests and concerns, born into law through your elected representatives, molded by your direct personal involvement, matured and refined through public conflict, interaction, and compromise, and completed as a result of your review, comment and advice. It is a good plan. You have reason to be proud. Perhaps, as individuals, we may say, “This is not exactly the plan I would like,” but together we can say, “This is a plan we can agree on, it is fair, and it is possible.” This is the most important part of all, because this Plan is only a beginning. A plan is a piece of paper-what counts is what happens on the ground. The California Desert Plan encompasses a tremendous area and many different resources and uses. The decisions in the Plan are major and important, but they are only general guides to site—specific actions. The job ahead of us now involves three tasks: —Site-specific plans, such as grazing allotment management plans or vehicle route designation; —On-the-ground actions, such as granting mineral leases, developing water sources for wildlife, building fences for livestock pastures or for protecting petroglyphs; and —Keeping people informed of and involved in putting the Plan to work on the ground, and in changing the Plan to meet future needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Panamint Butte Quadrangle, Inyo County, California
    Geology of the Panamint Butte Quadrangle, Inyo County, California By WAYNE E; HALL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1299 Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology KhCEIVED JUL161971 u.8.1 teuisfiUt, it UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 75-610447 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract_________________________________-_.-______-__--_-_--_--- 1 Introduction. ___________-______--_____--_----.--___--__-__--------- 2 Climate.and vegetation._________.__....__.._____-___________-__ 3 Water supply-________________________________________________ 3 Previous work__________________________.___._____._1________ 4 Acknowledgments- _______________._______..____-__-_---------_- 4 General geology.__________________________-__..____--_----_-_--__-- 5 Precambrian(?) rocks._____________.__________.._----___-___-_-_-__- 7 Paleozoic rocks._____.__.___--________-___-____-_-----_---_--.-.-_- 8 Cambrian System_____________________________________________ 8 Carrara Formation.__________________..-_____--____---__-_- 8 Bonanza King Formation___._.______..__._._.....____.____ 10 Nopah Formation._____...____-_-_.....____________-_-_-__- 11 Ordovician System___________________________________________ 13 Pogonip Group_____-__-______-____-_-..----------_--._-_-_- 13 Eureka Quartzite.______________-_____..___-_-_---_-----_--_ 16 Ely Springs Dolomite__---__-______________________________ 18 Silurian and Devonian Systems___________..__-_-__----_-__-___- 21 Hidden Valley Dolomite......._____________________________ 21 Devonian System_____________________________________________ 22 Lost Burro Formation.....__________________________________ 22 Mississippian System.___._____..____._.._..__.___..._._._..__.
    [Show full text]