DOCSLIB.ORG

Juvenile Diversion Guidebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Juvenile Diversion Guidebook Juvenile Diversion Guidebook Prepared by the Models for Change Juvenile Diversion Workgroup Prepared by: The Models for Change Juvenile Diversion Workgroup: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice National Juvenile Defender Center National Youth Screening and Assessment Project Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps The preparation of this document was supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation through its Models for Change initiative. The authors represent five of the member organizations from the National Resource Bank, an association of organizations that provide technical assistance to states through Models for Change. Anyone may use the content of this publication, as long as it is unchanged and in the whole, for redistribution, commercial and noncommercial, with credit to Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice, National Juvenile Defender Center, National Youth Screening and Assessment Project, and Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps and by reprinting the copyright notice below. © Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice, National Juvenile Defender Center, National Youth Screening and Assessment Project, and Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps March 2011 Models for Change Models for Change is an effort to create successful and replicable models of juvenile justice reform through targeted investments in key states, with core support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Models for Change seeks to accelerate progress toward a more effective, fair, and developmentally sound juvenile justice system that holds young people accountable for their actions, provides for their rehabilitation, protects them from harm, increases their life chances, and manages the risk they pose to themselves and to the public. Key states in the Models for Change initiative have been Illinois, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Washington, and through action networks focusing on key issues, in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, and Wisconsin. Juvenile Diversion Guidebook Prepared by the Models for Change Juvenile Diversion Workgroup ModelsforChange Systems Reform in Juvenile Justice Contents Part I. Introduction ....................................................................................................................7 Purpose for Guidebook................................................................................................7 Background ..................................................................................................................8 Part II. Overview of Diversion ................................................................................................11 A Brief History ...........................................................................................................11 Research Evidence on Diversion ..............................................................................11 Review of Statutes ...................................................................................................13 Part III. Developing & Improving Juvenile Diversion Programs .......................................17 Getting Started ..........................................................................................................17 About the Steps ........................................................................................................17 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................23 Step 1. The Objectives ........................................ 23 Step 2. Referral Decision Points ......................... 25 Step 3. Extent of Intervention ............................. 27 B. Oversight ...............................................................................................................30 Step 4. Operations ............................................... 30 Step 5. Funding .................................................... 32 C. Intake Criteria .......................................................................................................34 Step 6. Referral and Eligibility ............................ 34 Step 7. Screening and Assessment .................... 38 D. Operation Policies ................................................................................................41 Step 8. Participant Requirements ....................... 41 Step 9. Services ................................................... 44 Step 10. Incentives .............................................. 48 Step 11. Consequences of Failure to Comply .... 49 Step 12. Program Completion/Exit Criteria ........ 50 E. Legal Protections...................................................................................................52 Step 13. Information Use .................................... 52 Step 14. Legal Counsel ....................................... 53 F. Quality ....................................................................................................................56 Step 15. Program Integrity .................................. 56 Step 16. Outcome Evaluation ............................. 58 Appendix A. Models for Change .............................................................................................69 Appendix B. Diversion Workgroup ........................................................................................70 Appendix C. Advisory Board Members .................................................................................71 Appendix D. Models for Change Juvenile Diversion Survey Data Summary ................72 Appendix E. 50 State Statutory Review .................................................................................89 Attachment: Juvenile Diversion Workbook .......................................................................137 v Part 1: Introduction At one time or another, almost all adolescents engage system. These statistics, along with documented reports in risky behaviors, act without thinking, and make bad of inadequate and inappropriate care and treatment of decisions more often than they will as adults; thus, youth, have prompted reform efforts across the country many may engage in what would be judged as illegal at both the state and local levels. As a result, many behavior.1 Most youth are not apprehended every time states and localities are exploring diversion programs as they do so, but arrest is a common experience among a way to keep youth out of the juvenile justice system. adolescents, especially for youth of color in urban areas. This Guidebook aims to assist juvenile justice systems Yet only a minority of those youth will ever be arrested in developing and improving diversion programs and for a second delinquent act, or will become repeat processes. It was developed by the Models for Change offenders in adulthood.2 In other words, for the majority Juvenile Diversion Workgroup, funded by the John D. of youth who are arrested, their first delinquency is not a and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. In 2004, the sign of a future delinquency problem. MacArthur Foundation launched a major reform effort, known as the Models for Change initiative, in response Given these facts, a strong argument can be made to the concerns expressed here. The Models for Change for having a way to avoid formal processing of youth initiative is “grounded in a commitment to a separate through the juvenile justice system under certain justice system for youth that is responsive to their conditions. Without such a mechanism, large numbers developmental needs and focused on their practical of youth are unnecessarily charged and processed rehabilitation” and seeks to “harness and direct local through the system, thus increasing a youth’s probability reform work into a larger, coordinated effort to share of further delinquencies due to their exposure to other replicable models of reform and catalyze change across delinquent youth during this process. Moreover, by the nation.”5 See Appendix A for more information on formally processing these youth, resources available Models for Change. to the juvenile justice system are used in ways that weaken the system’s capacity to process and respond to the minority of youth who actually present a risk to Purpose for the Guidebook public safety and need juvenile justice adjudication and Programs that divert youth from involvement in the rehabilitation. juvenile justice system have become more frequent in response to the growing recognition that such Over 2 million youth in the U.S. under the age of 18 are involvement often is not necessary to achieve society’s arrested each year.3 Over 600,000 youth are placed in goals. The concept of diversion was first adopted by the detention centers annually, and approximately 95,000 adult criminal justice system, and in the 1960s, became reside in secure juvenile correctional settings on any a topic of discussion in the juvenile justice system.6 In given day.4 Many of these youth become involved 1967, the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement with the juvenile justice system for relatively minor and Administration of Justice recommended exploring and nonviolent offenses. Often a lack of appropriate alternatives for addressing the needs of troubled youth community-based treatments and services to address outside of the justice
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 53 Rolling, Trying to Grab on with My Spike Claws
    AN APPLE PAPERBACK SCHOLASTIC INC. New York Toronto London Auckland Sydney Mexico City New Delhi Hong Kong For Scott Bremner And for Michael and Jake <They're going after the elementary school,> Tobias said. <They're going after everything,> I answered. <Why are they doing this? It makes no sense,> Tobias said. <It's not just brutal; it's stu- pid. Pointless destruction.> The nearest Bug fighter swooped low and slow. It fired its Dracon beams and the two-story gym exploded into charred stucco and twisted steel beams. It drifted almost casually above the tired old low-slung classrooms and fired again, dragging the beam end-to-end along the buildings. <They're sending a message,> I said. <Mess with us and this is what we do.> 1 We had destroyed the Yeerk pool. The Yeerk More Bug fighters than I'd ever seen in one pool was now the world's biggest sinkhole. It place. Maybe fifty of the things. They blasted looked like a crater. It was a crater, with half the schools; they blasted businesses; they blasted mall in ruins on one slope, jumbled bits of homes and churches. The shock waves would fast-food restaurants, streetlights, ripped up reach us, echoes of destruction. Pillars of smoke concrete, cars, skinny trees, all tumbled rose high in the air. Fires, some blazing and roar- together at the bottom. The water of the Yeerk ing, others smoldering sullenly, created thermal pool, looking like molten lead, soaked up updrafts that were bread and butter to three through the dirt.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading for Life and Adolescent Re-Arrest: Evaluating a Unique Juvenile Diversion Program
    Reading For Life and Adolescent Re-Arrest: Evaluating a Unique Juvenile Diversion Program A. D. Seroczynski (Center for Children and Families, University of Notre Dame) William N. Evans (Wilson Sheehan Lab for Economic Opportunities, University of Notre Dame and NBER) Amy D. Jobst (Reading for Life, Inc.) Luke Horvath (Wilson Sheehan Lab for Economic Opportunities, University of Notre Dame) Giuliana Carozza (Wilson Sheehan Lab for Economic Opportunities, University of Notre Dame) July 15, 2015 Abstract We present results of an evaluation of Reading for Life (RFL), a diversion program for non-violent juvenile offenders in a medium-sized Midwestern county. The unique program uses philosophical virtue theory, works of literature, and small mentoring groups to foster moral development in juvenile offenders. Participants were randomly assigned to RFL treatment or a comparison program of community service. The RFL program generated large and statistically significant drops in future arrests. The program was particularly successful at reducing the recidivism of more serious offenses for those groups with the highest propensity for future offenses. Acknowledgements: This research was supported by grants from the Templeton Foundation and the University of Chicago’s Arête Initiative, the Florence V. Carroll Charitable Trust, the Stanley A. and Flora P. Clark Memorial Community Trust Foundation, the Muessel-Ellison Memorial Trust Foundation, the John, Anna and Martha Jane Fields Trust Foundation, the Wilson Sheehan Lab for Economic Opportunities, and the Fellow Irish Social Hub. The authors would like to thank the staff of the St. Joseph County Juvenile Justice Center’s Probation Department for their support of this project. Specifically, we would like to acknowledge the assistance of Bill Bruinsma, Ph.D., former Director, Thomas N.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL DISASTERS: Protecting the Public's Health
    Scientific Publication No. 575 NATURAL DISASTERS Protecting the Public’s Health Pan American Health Organization NATURAL DISASTERS: Protecting the Public’s Health Scientific Publication No. 575 Pan American Health Organization Pan American Sanitary Bureau, Regional Office of the World Health Organization 525 Twenty-third Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037, USA ii NATURAL DISASTERS: Protecting the Public’s Health Also published in Spanish with the title: Los desastres naturales y la protección de la salud ISBN 92 75 31575 2 PAHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Pan American Health Organization Natural disasters: Protecting the public’s health. Washington, D.C. : PAHO, ©2000. xi, 119 p.—(Scientific Publication, 575) ISBN 92 75 11575 3 I. Title II. (Series) 1. NATURAL DISASTERS 2. HEALTH EFFECT OF DISASTERS 3. DISASTERS PLANNING — organization and administration 4. EMERGENCIES IN DISASTERS — organization and administration 5. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION NLM HV553 The Pan American Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Applications and inquiries should be addressed to the Publications Program, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., which will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. ©Pan American Health Organization, 2000 Publications of the Pan American Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in ac- cordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights are reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Pan American Health Organization concerning the status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Youth Diversion Program
    MASSACHUSETTS YOUTH DIVERSION PROGRAM Model Program Guide A Report of the Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Policy (JJPAD) Board Community-Based Interventions Subcommittee March 2021 http://www.mass.gov/juvenile-justice-policy-and-data-board 1 | Page Members of the JJPAD Community Based Interventions (CBI) Subcommittee This report is the product of the efforts of the JJPAD CBI Subcommittee: Member Name Affiliation Maria Mossaides, Chair Office of the Child Advocate Thomas Capasso Juvenile Court Colleen O’Donnell Massachusetts Probation Service Kimberly Lawrence Nokuthula Sibanda Department of Youth Services Rebecca Brink Department of Children and Families Gretchen Carleton Karin Orr Department of Mental Health Brian Jenney Department of Public Health Josh Dohan Committee for Public Counsel Services Migdalia Nalls Michael Glennon Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office Leon Smith Citizens for Juvenile Justice Barbara Wilson Children’s League of Massachusetts Dawn Christie Parent representative Kevin Kennedy Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association Melissa Threadgill (Staff) Office of the Child Advocate Kristi Polizzano (Staff) Office of the Child Advocate Acknowledgements: This Model Program Guide benefited from collaboration with and feedback from Elizabeth Mulcahey and Naomi Bledsoe (Northwestern District Attorney’s Office), Bryan House (Berkshire District Attorney’s Office), Marlies Spanjaard (CPCS/the EdLaw Project),Nicole Robbins (Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office), James Barrett (Cambridge Police Department), Marie-Elena Edwards and Erin Cuddy (DYS Victim Services Unit), Katie Byrne and Sharifa Garvey (Department of Youth Service JDAI), JDAI county committees, and Leila Khelfaoui, Jasmine Jackson and Tessa Upin from the Crime and Justice Institute (which provided technical assistance on this project). The Subcommittee acknowledges and thanks these individuals for sharing their expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • An Outcomes Study of Juvenile Diversion Programs On
    AN OUTCOMES STUDY OF JUVENILE DIVERSION PROGRAMS ON NON-SERIOUS DELINQUENT AND STATUS OFFENDERS by MELODY J. STEWART Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Victor K. Groza Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2008 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of Melody J. Stewart, candidate for the Ph.D. degree*. (signed) Victor K. Groza, Ph.D. (chair of the committee) Kathleen J. Farkas, Ph.D. David B. Miller, Ph.D. Emilia N. McGucken, Ph.D. (date) May 21, 2008 * We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein ii Copyright © 2008 by Melody J. Stewart All rights reserved iii Table of Contents Page List of Tables ………………………………………………………………….. 4 List of Figures …………………………………………………………………. 6 Acknowledgements and Dedication ………………………………………… 7 Abstract ………………………………………………………………………… 10 Chapter 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………. 12 Overview of Problem …………………………………. 13 Overview of Juvenile Diversion Programs …………. 17 Cuyahoga County Juvenile Diversion Programs …. 22 2. Theoretical Perspectives …………………………………….. 26 Labeling Theory ………………………………………. 26 Restorative Justice …………………………………… 28 Outcomes of Diversion Programs ………………….. 32 Effectiveness of Diversion Programs ………………. 35 Summary and Research Questions ………………… 39 3. Methodology …………………………………………………… 43 Research Design ……………………………………… 44 Sample and Selection Criteria ……………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Area of Origin and a Columbia River Diversion Ralph W
    University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Articles Faculty Publications 1971 The Area of Origin and a Columbia River Diversion Ralph W. Johnson University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Ralph W. Johnson, The Area of Origin and a Columbia River Diversion, 46 Wash. L. Rev. 245 (1971), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/491 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AREA OF ORIGIN AND A COLUMBIA RIVER DIVERSIONt Ralph W. Johnson* In 1968 Congress declared a ten-year moratorium on any study of diversion of Columbia River water to the Southwest.' One of the reasons for the moratorium was to give residents of the Pacific North- west time to analyze their region's water needs to determine if "sur- plus" waters are available for export, and to establish, in a broader sense, a regional policy towards diversion proposals. This article as- sumes a neutral stance2 towards the ultimate issue of diversion and attempts only to analyze the problem of protecting the area of origin in the event of a Columbia River to Southwest interbasin water trans- fer t Part of the research on this article was performed under a grant from the Washington Water Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Stress and Diapause in Two Calliphoridae Species
    Effect of stress and diapause in two Calliphoridae species. by Bobbie Johnson A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences The University of Birmingham January 2013 0 Abstract Cultures of two Dipteran flies (Calliphora vicina (R-D) and C. vomitoria (L.)) were established to answer questions in regards to responses to thermal and desiccation stress, effects of diapause and the mechanisms which underpin diapause. The findings are divided in to two sections. Unequivocal new findings – Calliphora vomitoria were seen to depend on water being present in culture medium for survival to be high. Furthermore, C. vomitoria were found to be less able to resist desiccation than C. vicina. Larvae of C. vicina and C. vomitoria showed different cold tolerance strategies, with C. vicina being freeze-avoiding and C. vomitoria ‘partially’ freeze- tolerant. Metabolomics, using 1H-NMR, revealed that diapause and non-diapause had distinct metabolic profiles. Diapause larvae were seen to reduce energy synthesis from the Krebs cycle and increase glycolysis. Calliphora vicina and C. vomitoria also exhibited different diapause phenotypes; C. vicina entered a maternally regulated facultative diapause as an L3 larvae, Calliphora vomitoria had a less distinct diapause, with maternal conditions having little effect. Speculative new findings - Despite the above differences in culturing, desiccation and cold tolerance, C. vicina and C. vomitoria were able to produce a viable cross, though field fresh C. vomitoria were not used, as such it cannot be confirmed if this could occur in the wild. Field studies showed that increased temperatures due to climate change may affect both phenology and survival of insects; C.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Making on Ambulance Diversion at the Emergency Department
    UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN MASTER RESEARCH PROJECT DECISION MAKING ON AMBULANCE DIVERSION AT THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT August 15, 2018 Author M. Witvoet S2421968 Supervised by: Dr. M.J. Land Dr. ir. D.J. Van der Zee Supervisors MCL: H. Lameijer, MD J.M. Theunissen, MD R.S. Stolmeijer, MD Ambulance diversion at the emergency department Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Emergency department ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Overcrowding ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Ambulance diversion ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Causes of ambulance diversion ...................................................................................................... 7 2.5 Implications .................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Research context &
    [Show full text]
  • "The Politics and Policy of Juvenile Diversion Programs"
    Bellas 1 “The Politics and Policy of Juvenile Diversion Programs” Christopher M. Bellas, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Criminal Justice & Forensic Sciences Youngstown State University Youngstown, Ohio 44555 [email protected] ABSTRACT Policymaking involves the allocation of governmental resources often based on public opinion about a particular salient event. The choices, outputs, and impact of policy decisions are dependent upon the perceived injustices by society which generally commence with mass mobilization and ends with politicians placing the controversial issue on the legislative agenda. This is particularly so when the issue involves matters related to criminal justice. This paper takes a look at the historical and political development of one salient issue, juvenile delinquency. First, an examination of the Child Saver‘s Movement is highlighted as it was the impetus for separating juveniles from adults on matters related to criminal justice. This separation continued well into the 1960‘s and 1970‘s and received financial and policy support at the federal level until funding sources were depleted. The paper then shifts to the theoretical foundations for juvenile diversion programs viewed from a criminological perspective. Labeling Theory is closely tied to juvenile diversion programming however as several of the case studies suggest, a more community integrated theory may best explain both the onset of delinquency and how best to address the issue of youthful misbehavior. A program‘s success often depends on those who implement it. Prior work on diversion programs suggests there are only slight differences between legal and therapeutic actors regarding decision making, but the perceptions by youth when it comes to the formal and informal system often differ.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Review of Police-Led Diversion Programs
    This project was supported by grant number 2012-CK-WX-K014 awarded by the Offce of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the offcial position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specifc agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant fux, the author(s) cannot vouch for their current validity. Recommended citation: Tallon, Jennifer A., Melissa Labriola, and Joseph Spadafore. 2018. Creating Off-Ramps: A National Review of Police-Led Diversion Programs. New York: Center for Court Innovation. Published 2018 CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Executive Summary vii Phase One: A national survey of police-led diversion programs . vii Phase Two: Case studies of eight promising programs . ix Introduction 1 Prior research on police-led diversion . .2 About this study . 4 Part One: 7 A National Survey Of Police-Led Diversion Programs 7 Chapter 1—Phase One Research Design: Surveys 9 Survey overview. 9 Survey sampling plan . .9 Survey content . 10 Data collection . 10 Analysis plan .. ......................................... 12 Defning diversion programs. 13 List of responding agencies . 14 Chapter 2—Phase One Survey Results: Diversion History, Structure, Screening, and Eligibility 15 Prevalence of police-led diversion . 15 History and structure . 16 Screening and eligibility determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Advice on Jail Diversion   Funding
    outcomesmental health courtcriminal justice accountabilitysustainability advocacy community Practical Advice on Jail Diversion funding spanner Ten Years of Learnings on Jail Diversion from the evidence-based boundary CMHS National GAINS Center practices CMHS National GAINS Center transportation CMHS GAINS TAPA Center for Jail Diversion family reentry housingchild carepublic safetyrecoveryintegrated treatment Practical Advice on Jail Diversion: Ten Years of Learnings on Jail Diversion from the CMHS National GAINS Center CMHS National GAINS Center CMHS GAINS TAPA Center for Jail Diversion Delmar, NY Recommended citation: CMHS National GAINS Center. (2007). Practical advice on jail diversion: Ten years of learnings on jail diversion from the CMHS National GAINS Center. Delmar, NY: Author. This publication is based on content produced by the CMHS National GAINS Center and the CMHS GAINS Technical Assistance and Policy Analysis (TAPA) Center for Jail Diversion, with support from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS). The material contained in this publication does not necessarily represent the position of the SAMHSA Center for Mental Health Services. Susan Milstrey Wells was contracted to write this publication. The CMHS National GAINS Center acknowledges the members of the review panel, program and evaluation staff of the 32 grantees of the CMHS Targeted Capacity Expansion for Jail Diversion Programs initiative, the communities that provided feedback, and the individuals and programs that shared expertise and materials for the project. This publication is available from the CMHS National GAINS Center website at http://www.gainscenter.samhsa. gov. You can contact the Center at (800) 311-4246 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Beijing Rules")
    1 United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice ("The Beijing Rules") Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/33 of 29 November 1985 Part one GENERAL PRINCIPLES 1. Fundamental perspectives 1.1 Member States shall seek, in conformity with their respective general interests, to further the well-being of the juvenile and her or his family. 1.2 Member States shall endeavour to develop conditions that will ensure for the juvenile a meaningful life in the community, which, during that period in life when she or he is most susceptible to deviant behaviour, will foster a process of personal development and education that is as free from crime and delinquency as possible. 1.3 Sufficient attention shall be given to positive measures that involve the full mobilization of all possible resources, including the family, volunteers and other community groups, as well as schools and other community institutions, for the purpose of promoting the well-being of the juvenile, with a view to reducing the need for intervention under the law, and of effectively, fairly and humanely dealing with the juvenile in conflict with the law. 1.4 Juvenile justice shall be conceived as an integral part of the national development process of each country, within a comprehensive framework of social justice for all juveniles, thus, at the same time, contributing to the protection of the young and the maintenance of a peaceful order in society. 1.5 These Rules shall be implemented in the context of economic, social and cultural conditions prevailing in each Member State. 1.6 Juvenile justice services shall be systematically developed and coordinated with a view to improving and sustaining the competence of personnel involved in the services, including their methods, approaches and attitudes.
    [Show full text]