DOCSLIB.ORG

A Case Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MEDIATION IN THE NEW DISPUTE RESOLUTION LANDSCAPE; A CASE FOR THE ENHANCEMENT OF ITS APPLICATION IN MALAYSIA NURAH SABAHIAH BINTI MOHAMED FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR 2013 MEDIATION IN THE NEW DISPUTE RESOLUTION LANDSCAPE; A CASE FOR THE ENHANCEMENT OF ITS APPLICATION IN MALAYSIA NURAH SABAHIAH BINTI MOHAMED THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR 2013 UNIVERSITI MALAYA ORIGINAL LITERARY WORK DECLARATION Name of Candidate : Nurah Sabahiah Mohamed (I.C. No: 710625-03-5286) Registration/ Matric No: LHA 070003 Name of Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Mediation in the New Dispute Resolution Landscape; A Case for the Enhancement of Its Application in Malaysia Field of Study: Mediation I do solemnly and sincerely declare that: (1) I am the sole author/writer of this work; (2) This Work is original; (3) Any use of any work in which copyright exists was done by way of fair dealing and for any permitted purposes and any excerpt or extract from, or reference to or reproduction of any copyright work has been disclosed expressly and sufficiently and the title of the Work and its authorship have been acknowledged in this Work; (4) I do not have any actual knowledge nor I do ought reasonably to know the making of this work constitutes an infringement of any copyright work; (5) I hereby assign all and every rights in the copyright to this Work to the University of Malaya (“UM”), who henceforth shall be owner of the copyright in this Work and that any reproduction or use in any form or by any means whatsoever is prohibited without the written consent of UM having been first had and obtained. (6) I am fully aware that if in the course of making this Work I have infringed any copyright whether intentionally or otherwise, I may be subject to legal action as may be determined by UM. Candidate’s Signature……………………… Date______________ (Nurah Sabahiah Binti Mohamed) Subscribed and solemnly declared before; Witness’s Signature_________________ Date_______________ Name_____________________________ Designation___________ ii ABSTRACT This dissertation supports the paradigm shift in the administration of the civil justice system that strives for disputes to be resolved without adjudication. Various measures have been introduced and adopted in many jurisdictions across the common law world to achieve this overriding objective. It cannot be denied that alternative dispute resolution processes play an important and fundamental part in furthering and attaining this principal goal of the new procedural philosophy. The focal point of this dissertation in on the ‘mediation’ as an option for resolving disputes. Mediation, as a form of dispute resolution mechanism, is widely used to facilitate settlement of disagreements across many industries and nature of disputes. The mediation movement continues to gain momentum and popularity in more and more jurisdictions. The civil courts in these jurisdictions are beginning to utilize this mechanism to address and help overcome the tensions or recurrent challenges such as delay, costs and the backlog of cases in the civil justice system. The central theme of this dissertation is the role of mediation in speeding up the disposal of cases, relieving backlog of cases in the civil courts and giving convenient disposals for the disputing parties. Mediation should be regarded and adopted as an imperative component of the dispute resolution landscape in Malaysia. The greater use of private mediation will reduce the volume of cases filed into the civil court and the structured approach of court annexed mediation will speed up the disposal of cases and reducing the number of backlog cases. Therefore the dissertation proposes mediation to be enhanced at these two levels; the private mediation or non court mediation and at the stage of court annexed mediation. This dissertation takes the position that the civil justice system in Malaysia should encourage, facilitate and even mandate the use of mediation in the dispute resolution process. While mediation may not be the sole means to alleviate the problems relating to the delay and backlog of cases, it is submitted that mediation plays a pivotal role in combating the issues encountered by the civil justice systems in most jurisdictions. In this regard, this dissertation will analyse, the suitability of mediation in Malaysia, the problem of backlog cases in the civil court, the manner in which mediation is most effective and attractive for Malaysians and the effective application of private mediation and court annexed mediation in Malaysia. This dissertation will also scrutinize the use of mediation in other jurisdictions, particularly Singapore and Australia as the means to resolve disputes and to reduce backlog cases. We will draw from the experiences and lessons learnt from these jurisdictions; and offer suggestions for the adoption and/or reform of the mediation practice in Malaysia. iii ABSTRAK Kajian ini mendokong peningkatan model didalam pentadbiran sistem keadilan sivil yang menekankan penyelesaian pertikaian tanpa perbicaraan. Berbagai pendekatan telah diperkenalkan dan dipakai di dalam banyak negara untuk mencapai objektif ini. Sesunguhnya tidak dapat dinafikan bahawa proses pertikaian alternatif memainkan peranan yang penting dan asas untuk menjayakan pendekatan prosedur baru ini. Fokus utama kajian ini adalah ke atas pemakaian ‘mediasi’sebagai satu kaedah penyelesaian pertikaian. Mediasi telah diguna pakai secara meluas untuk menyelesaikan pertikaian dan mencapai kata sepakat didalam banyak industri dan untuk berbagai jenis pertikaian. Mediasi telah berkembang dan semakin mendapat tempat di beberapa negara. Mahkamah-mahkamah sivil di negara terbabit juga telah mula menggunakan mediasi sebagai satu mekanisme untuk penyelesaian masalah yang berbangkit di mahkamah terutamanya masalah kes- kes tertunggak. kelewatan penyelesaian kes dan kos mahkamah yang tinggi. Tema utama kajian ini adalah peranan mediasi sebagai satu mekanisme untuk mempercepatkan penyelesaian dan mengurangkan kes-kes tertunggak di mahkamah sivil serta peranan mediasi dalam memberikan penyelesaian terbaik kepada pihak-pihak yang bertikai. Mediasi seharusnya dianggap dan digunapakai sebagai satu komponen untuk landskap penyelesaian pertikaian di Malaysia. Kajian ini mengutarakan bahawa sistem keadilan sivil di Malaysia seharusnya menggalakkan, memudahkan dan seterusnya mewajibkan pemakaian mediasi sebagai satu cara penyelesaian pertikaian. Pemakaiaan mediasi di luar mahkamah secara meluas akan mengurangkan jumlah kes yang difailkan ke mahkamah dan pendekatan mediasi yang berstruktur dan terancang di mahkamah pula akan memepercepatkan penyelesaian kes- kes dan seterusnya akan mengurangkan jumlah kes tertunggak. Untuk itu kajian ini mencadangkan penggunaaan mediasi dipertingkatkan di ke dua peringkat ini; iaitu mediasi di luar mahkamah dan juga mediasi di dalam mahkamah. Walaupun mediasi adalah bukan satu-satunya cara untuk mengurangkan kes-kes tertunggak dan kelewatan di mahkamah, penggunaannya telah memberikan impak yang besar dalam menyelesaikan isu-isu berbangkit dengan sistem keadilan di beberapa negara, terutamanya dalam menangani masalah kes-kes tertunggak. Untuk itu tesis ini akan mengkaji kesesuaian pemakaian mediasi di Malaysia, permasalahan kes-kes tertunggak di mahkamah sivil, bentuk mediasi yang paling efektif and menarik kepada penduduk Malaysia dan juga pemakaian mediasi di luar mahkamah dan mediasi didalam mahkamah yang paling efektif. Selain itu kajian ini juga akan meneliti penggunaan mediasi di beberapa negara terutamanya di Singapura dan Australia sebagai satu mekanisme penyelesaian pertikaian dan pengurangan kes di tertunggak di mahkamah. Pengalaman dan pengajaran dari negara-negara ini akan di jadikan panduan dan cadangan untuk satu reformasi pemakaian mediasi di Malaysia. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the help and support of many people especially my husband, Mustaza and our children; Musfira, Munif and Maisara. I thank each one of them for their understanding and support. I am particularly indebted to my supervisor, Professor Dr. Choong Yeow Chong for his constructive criticisms, assistance and patience in supervising my research. My deep gratitude also goes to Assoc. Prof. Dr Juriah Abd Jalil, the Head of Legal Practice Department for her constant encouragement. I also wish to express my gratitude to Encik Osman Ahmad of Consumer Claims Tribunal, Puan Ruzita Ramli and Encik Rosdi Hanafi from Jabatan Kehakiman Shariah Malaysia, Puan Dayang Ellyn Narisa Abang Ahmad and Tuan Sharizad from Kuching High Court and Puan Isma Julia from Legal Aid Department for their kind cooperation and assistance. I also wish to express my gratitude to David Leonard and Colin Lavars from Dispute Settlement Centre, Victoria, Di Moloney of Family Relationship Center Melbourne, Ian De Lacey from the Victorian Administrative Tribunal, Melboune, Nicholas Flaskas, Laurie Walton, Steve Jupp and Jeannie Highet from the Supreme Court of New South Wales in granting me the facilities and assistance in my research. Many thanks also to Puan Hidayah from the University of Sydney for the facilities and guidance. My appreciation also goes to Puan Kamaria Djorimi and Encik Mustafalhadi from the Shariah Court Singapore, Angela Mitakidis and Elliot Goon from Singapore Mediation Centre, Josephine Kang, Joyce Law and Marvin from the Primary Dispute Settlement
Recommended publications
  • Court-Annexed Mediation Practice in Malaysia: What the Future Holds

    Court-Annexed Mediation Practice in Malaysia: What the Future Holds

    ARTICLES & ESSAYS DOI 10.6092/issn.2531-6133/6751 Court-Annexed Mediation Practice in Malaysia: What the Future Holds † CHOONG YEOW CHOY & TIE FATT HEE & CHRISTINA OOI SU SIANG TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction; 2. Court-Annexed Mediation – The Motivations and the Mechanism of the Programme; 3. Provisions on Court-Annexed Mediation; 4. Practice Direction No. 5 of 2010 (Practice Direction on Mediation); 5. Rules for Court Assisted Mediation; 6. The Mediation Act 2012; 7. Role of the Courts and Judiciary in Court-Annexed Mediation; 8. Overcoming the Challenges; 9. What the Future Holds; 10. Conclusion. ABSTRACT: It is an indubitable fact that the use of mediation as a form of dispute resolution has gained traction across the globe. More importantly, the practice of mediation has also been transformed through the establishment of several techniques for formalized mediation. This article will provide insights into one of these avenues for formalised mediation, namely, court-annexed mediation practice in Malaysia. It will first discuss the motivations that led to the introduction of such a programme. This will be followed by an analysis of the operational aspects of the practice. A matter of utmost importance concerns the role of the courts and the judiciary in court- annexed mediation and will be considered in great detail. This article will then offer suggestions on how some of the challenges that exist and are inherent in this particular method of formalised mediation could be overcome. These views are expressed with the hope that court-annexed mediation can function as an effective alternative dispute resolution mechanism under the umbrella of the Malaysian courts.
  • July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report » East Asia and Pacific » Malaysia

    July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report » East Asia and Pacific » Malaysia

    Malaysia Page 1 of 12 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » International Religious Freedom » July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report » East Asia and Pacific » Malaysia Malaysia BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report Report September 13, 2011 The constitution protects freedom of religion; however, portions of the constitution as well as other laws and policies placed some restrictions on religious freedom. The constitution gives the federal and state governments the power to "control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam." The constitution also defines ethnic Malays as Muslim. Civil courts generally ceded authority to Sharia (Islamic law) courts on cases concerning conversion from Islam, and Sharia courts remained reluctant to allow for such conversions. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period. Muslims generally may not legally convert to another religion, although members of other religions may convert to Islam. Officials at the federal and state government levels oversee Islamic religious activities, and sometimes influence the content of sermons, use mosques to convey political messages, and prevent certain imams from speaking at mosques. The government maintains a dual legal system, whereby Sharia courts rule on religious and family issues involving Muslims and secular courts rule on other issues pertaining to both Muslims and the broader population. Government policies promoted Islam above other religions. Minority religious groups remained generally free to practice their beliefs; however, over the past several years, many have expressed concern that the civil court system has gradually ceded jurisdictional control to Sharia courts, particularly in areas of family law involving disputes between Muslims and non-Muslims.
  • AI Sentencing in Sabah and Sarawak

    AI Sentencing in Sabah and Sarawak

    Artificial Intelligence in the Courts: AI sentencing in Sabah and Sarawak VIEWS 40/20 | 18 August 2020 | Claire Lim and Rachel Gong Views are short opinion pieces by the author(s) to encourage the exchange of ideas on current issues. They may not necessarily represent the official views of KRI. All errors remain the authors’ own. This view was prepared by Claire Lim and Rachel Gong, a researcher from the Khazanah Research Institute (KRI). The authors are grateful for valuable input and comments from Aidonna Jan Ayub, Ong Kar Jin, and representatives of the courts of Sabah and Sarawak and SAINS. Corresponding author’s email address: [email protected] Introduction Attribution – Please cite the work as The Covid-19 pandemic has accelerated the need for many follows: Lim, Claire and Rachel Gong. 2020. Artificial Intelligence in the Courts: industries to undertake digital transformation. Even the AI Sentencing in Sabah and Sarawak. traditionally conservative judicial system has embraced Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research this ‘new normal’, for example, by holding court trials Institute. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0. online1. However, adapting to technological change is not foreign to the Malaysian judiciary. Earlier this year, even Translations – If you create a translation before the pandemic forced industries to embrace digital of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This transformation, the Sabah and Sarawak courts launched a translation was not created by Khazanah pilot artificial intelligence (AI) tool2 as a guide to help judges Research Institute and should not be considered an official Khazanah with sentencing decisions.
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CONTENTS I

    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CONTENTS I

    JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTSJAC COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CONTENTS i CONTENTS PAGE CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 - 3 BACKGROUND 4 - 7 q History of Establishment q Members of the Commission MEETINGS 8 - 10 q Judicial Appointments Commission Meetings q Selection Meetings APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES 11 - 17 q Selection Criteria q Selection Process q Appointment of Superior Court Judges v Federal Court Judges v Court of Appeal Judges v High Court Judges v Judicial Commissioners JUDICIAL ACADEMY 18 - 47 q Training Programmes Conducted in 2018 q Publication Activities for 2018 IMPROVING THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 48 THE SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMISSION 49 q Roles and Functions q Financial Allocation JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD 1 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD Transparency and integrity are important dimensions that guarantee justice based on the principle of the Rule of Law. As the most important element in the practice of separation of power doctrine in Malaysia, judicial institutions need to be a reference model to legislative and executive institutions. Hence, the presentation of the Annual Report of the Judicial Appointments Commission Year 2018 is not merely to comply with the requirements of Section 31 of the Judicial Appointments Commission Act (Act 695). In fact, it is a form of manifestation towards realising the responsibility of institutionalising the spirit and practice of high transparency and integrity. This report is an important channel for disseminating information on the functions, performance and achievements of the Commission in 2018 to all stakeholders, especially law practitioners and the public at large.
  • DR LOURDES DAVA RAJ CURUZ DURAI RAJ V. DR MILTON LUM SIEW WAH & ANOR

    DR LOURDES DAVA RAJ CURUZ DURAI RAJ V. DR MILTON LUM SIEW WAH & ANOR

    JE34/2020 10 September 2020 Dr Lourdes Dava Raj Curuz Durai Raj [2020] 5 MLRA v. Dr Milton Lum Siew Wah & Anor 333 DR LOURDES DAVA RAJ CURUZ DURAI RAJ v. DR MILTON LUM SIEW WAH & ANOR Federal Court, Putrajaya Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ, Rohana Yusuf PCA, Azahar Mohamed CJM, David Wong Dak Wah CJSS, Nallini Pathmanthan FCJ [Civil Appeal No: 02(i)-118-12-2018(W)] 29 July 2020 Administrative Law: Judicial review — Judicial review proceedings — Rules of natural justice — Adverse order made against person directly affected who was deprived of his right to be heard — Whether rules of natural justice breached — Whether order a nullity and ought to be set aside — Whether principle in Hong Leong Bank Bhd v. Staghorn Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals applied — Rules of Court 2012, O 15 r 6, O 53 r 4(2) The appellant (‘Dr Lourdes’) was, at the material time, the Chief Medical Service Officer and person in charge of Assunta Hospital. The 1st respondent (‘Dr Milton’) was then a Visiting Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist at the same hospital while the 2nd respondent was the Malaysian Medical Council (‘MMC’). Pursuant to a complaint by Dr Milton, the MMC charged Dr Lourdes with infamous conduct in a professional respect. An inquiry was carried out and, by a majority, the MMC found that Dr Lourdes had no case to answer. Dr Milton was dissatisfied with the outcome of the inquiry and proceeded to institute judicial review proceedings for an order of certiorari against the MMC’s majority decision. Dr Milton additionally sought a declaration that Dr Lourdes was guilty of the charge against him and that the MMC be ordered to hear his plea in mitigation and for the imposition of an appropriate sentence.
  • Laporan Tahunan 2019 Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman

    Laporan Tahunan 2019 Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman

    SURUHANJAYA PELANTIKAN KEHAKIMAN LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2019 SURUHANJAYA PELANTIKAN KEHAKIMAN KANDUNGAN PRAKATA PENGERUSI 1 RINGKASAN EKSEKUTIF 3 LATAR BELAKANG 5 MESYUARAT 9 PELANTIKAN HAKIM 13 AKADEMI KEHAKIMAN 21 URUS SETIA 46 SURUHANJAYA PELANTIKAN KEHAKIMAN PRAKATA PENGERUSI SURUHANJAYA PELANTIKAN KEHAKIMAN PRAKATA PENGERUSI Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh. Kebebasan Institusi Kehakiman adalah asas kepada setiap sistem undang-undang di dunia, termasuk Malaysia. Justeru, proses yang mana Hakim dilantik hendaklah bersih, telus dan bertanggungjawab. Ini adalah antara alasan utama Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman (Suruhanjaya) ditubuhkan; iaitu untuk mengukuhkan dan meningkatkan integriti institusi kehakiman dan memenuhi kehendak dan aspirasi rakyat untuk melihat ketelusan dan keadilan dalam sistem kehakiman Malaysia dipatuhi. Pembentangan Laporan Tahunan Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman ini bukanlah sekadar memenuhi kehendak seksyen 31 Akta Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman (Akta 695) tetapi untuk menunjukkan bahawa dalam menjalankan fungsi-fungsi statutorinya, Suruhanjaya ini mendukung kebebasan berterusan institusi kehakiman dan secara lanjutan, prinsip the rule of law. Dengan itu, saya dengan sukacitanya mengalu-alukan pembentangan Laporan Tahunan Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman Tahun 2019. Semua pemegang taruh/ pihak yang berkepentingan termasuk hakim, pegawai kehakiman dan perundangan, pengamal undang-undang dan orang awam boleh melihat daripada Laporan Tahunan Suruhanjaya Pelantikan Kehakiman Tahun
  • In the Federal Court of Malaysia (Appellate Jurisdiction) Criminal Appeal No. 05-94-05/2017(B) Between Alma Nudo Atenza [No

    In the Federal Court of Malaysia (Appellate Jurisdiction) Criminal Appeal No. 05-94-05/2017(B) Between Alma Nudo Atenza [No

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 05-94-05/2017(B) BETWEEN ALMA NUDO ATENZA [NO. PP: EB 920334] … APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR … RESPONDENT [In The Court Of Appeal Malaysia Criminal Appeal No. B-05(M)-132-04/2016 (PHL) Between Alma Nudo Atienza … Appellant [Passport No. EB9203346) And Public Prosecutor … Respondent] HEARD TOGETHER WITH IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 05-193-08/2017(W) BETWEEN ORATHAI PROMMATAT (PASSPORT NO.: AA 3289996) … APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR … RESPONDENT 1 [In The Court of Appeal Malaysia Criminal Appeal No. W-05(M)-389-10/2016 Between Orathai Prommatat … Appellant And Public Prosecutor … Respondent] Coram: Richard Malanjum, CJ David Wong Dak Wah, CJSS Ramly Bin Haji Ali, FCJ Balia Yusof Bin Haji Wahi, FCJ Alizatul Khair Binti Osman Khairuddin, FCJ Rohana Binti Yusuf, FCJ Tengku Maimun Binti Tuan Mat, FCJ Abang Iskandar Bin Abang Hashim, FCJ Nallini Pathmanathan, FCJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT INTRODUCTION 1. The common and central issue in the present appeals is on the constitutional validity of section 37A of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (“DDA”), with reference to Articles 5, 8, and 121 of the Federal Constitution (“FC”). 2 2. Each of the Appellants in these two appeals was charged before and convicted by two different trial Judges for drug trafficking under section 39B of the DDA. However, since both appeals were premised on one common and crucial issue we proceeded to hear them together while conscious of the fact that on merits these two appeals might differ.
  • T Study on JICA's Technical Cooperation to Malaysia Volume 2

    T Study on JICA's Technical Cooperation to Malaysia Volume 2

    ~ t Study on JICA's Technical Cooperation to Malaysia Volume 2 J l 1 1 1 .s·~ ·. l JICAJ l l l l l Asset Study on JICA's Technical Cooperation to Malaysia I Volume 2 I J Final Report J J J J ~~~i, :C'<"' "'~ ."' ~,.., ,v~',;;/;} ,"'~,_;•A 0 f•0w,\" " ' r ,E Researc lit ·."·', ~\\ < 't'-.. -~!St "'": ~»v,;,s:"', ~< J Plannjng~ Econ~~C2 nsultan_1s PE Research 5dn Bhd J 1338 Jalan 5525/2, Taman Mewah 47301 Petaling Jaya, 5elangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia J www.peresearch.com.my November 2009 J J I [ I -] l f' [l [ 8 [l u L: IJ ( ~ :J 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c L u u 1 1 Asset Study on JlCA's Technical Cooperation to Malaysia: Volume 2 l Table of Content l ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... Ill INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1 1. AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES ...................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-Based Industry .......... .... ........................ .. ...... .. .. 1-1 l 1.1.1 Department of Agriculture (DOA) ................ ............................... ................. 1-3 1.1.2 Department of Fisheries (DOF) ...... .... ............................. ................ .......... 1-11 1.1.3 Department of Veterinary Services (DVS) .... .. ..... ............................... .. .. .. 1-18 l 1.1.4 Veterinary Research Institute (VRI) .... .... .. ...............................................
  • Case Concerning Sovereignty Over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore)

    Case Concerning Sovereignty Over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore)

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE (MALAYSIA/SINGAPORE) JUDGMENT OF 23 MAY 2008 2008 COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRE|TS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE RELATIVE Av LA SOUVERAINETÉ SUR PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS ET SOUTH LEDGE (MALAISIE/SINGAPOUR) ARRE|T DU 23 MAI 2008 Official citation: Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2008,p.12 Mode officiel de citation: Souveraineté sur Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks et South Ledge (Malaisie/Singapour), arrêt, C.I.J. Recueil 2008,p.12 Sales number ISSN 0074-4441 No de vente: 937 ISBN 978-92-1-071046-6 23 MAY 2008 JUDGMENT SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/ PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE (MALAYSIA/SINGAPORE) SOUVERAINETÉ SUR PEDRA BRANCA/ PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS ET SOUTH LEDGE (MALAISIE/SINGAPOUR) 23 MAI 2008 ARRE|T 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs 1. CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-15 2. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS 16-19 3. GENERAL HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 20-29 4. HISTORY OF THE DISPUTE 30-36 5. SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH 37-277 5.1. Arguments of the Parties 37-42 5.2. The question of the burden of proof 43-45 5.3. Legal status of Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh before the 1840s 46-117 5.3.1. Original title to Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh 46-80 5.3.2.
  • Government of State of Sarawak.Pmd

    Government of State of Sarawak.Pmd

    Government Of The State Of Sarawak & Anor v. Chong Chieng Jen 1 A GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF SARAWAK & ANOR v. CHONG CHIENG JEN COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA DAVID WONG DAK WAH JCA ABDUL RAHMAN SEBLI JCA B ZAMANI A RAHIM JCA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: Q-01-210-06-2014] 7 APRIL 2016 TORT: Defamation – Allegation of mismanagement of State’s financial affairs – C Suit by State Government and State Financial Authority – Whether parties lacked locus to maintain action for defamation – Whether common law principle propounded in Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd (Derbyshire principle) applicable – Whether proceedings by or against Government regulated by statute – Whether s. 3 Government Proceedings Act 1956 allows Government to sue D for defamation by way of civil action – Whether a statutory right – Whether Derbyshire principle consistent with art. 10(1) Federal Constitution – Civil Law Act 1956, s. 3(1) – Chung Khiaw Bank Ltd v. Hotel Rasa Sayang Sdn Bhd CIVIL PROCEDURE: Action – Government proceedings – Defamation – Allegation of mismanagement of State’s financial affairs – Suit by State Government E and State Financial Authority – Whether parties lacked locus to maintain action for defamation – Whether common law principle propounded in Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd (Derbyshire principle) applicable – Whether proceedings by or against Government regulated by statute – Whether s. 3 Government Proceedings Act 1956 allows Government to sue for defamation by way F of civil action – Whether a statutory right – Whether Derbyshire principle consistent with art. 10(1) Federal Constitution – Civil Law Act 1956, s. 3(1) – Chung Khiaw Bank Ltd v. Hotel Rasa Sayang Sdn Bhd & Anor WORDS & PHRASES: ‘other provision’ – Civil Law Act 1956, s.
  • To View the Updated Information Pertaining to the Court Directives for the Penang State Courts

    To View the Updated Information Pertaining to the Court Directives for the Penang State Courts

    Please click here (see page 29 onwards) to view the updated information pertaining to the court directives for the Penang State Courts. Circular No 010/2021 Dated 13 Jan 2021 To Members of the Malaysian Bar Notification of Operations at Penang State Courts During the MCO Period We refer to the Movement Control Order (“MCO”) announced by the Prime Minister on 11 Jan 2021, which apply to the states of Selangor, Penang, Melaka, Johore and Sabah, and the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Putrajaya and Labuan, beginning from 13 Jan to 26 Jan 2021. Please click here (see page 2 onwards) to view the court directives for the Penang State Courts. We hope that the information provided here is of assistance. We will continue to notify Members as and when there are updates from the State Courts. Stay safe. A G KALIDAS Secretary Malaysian Bar Tel : 04-2615669 No. 4. Green Hall, Fax/Tel : 04-2628664 1st Floor, E-mail : [email protected] 10200 Penang, Website : www.penangbar.org Malaysia. JAWATANKUASA PEGUAM PULAU PINANG PENANG BAR COMMITTEE Court Liaison 3/21 12 Jan 2021 To Members of the Penang Bar, Information Pertaining to Penang Courts Operations during Movement Control Order from 13 Jan 2021 to 26 Jan 2021 Reference is made to the Movement Control Order (MCO) announced by the Right Honourable Prime Minister on 11 Jan 2021, which applies to the states of Selangor, Penang, Melaka, Johore and Sabah, and the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Putrajaya and Labuan, beginning from 13 Jan 2021 to 26 Jan 2021. The Office of Chief Registrar of the Federal Court of Malaysia has issued a Directive today dated 12 Jan 2021 entitled “Operasi Mahkamah Semasa Pelaksanaan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP) Berkuat Kuasa Mulai 13 Hingga 26 Januari 2021” pertaining to Court operations during the MCO period in the affected areas with directives for both Civil and Criminal cases.
  • (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. S-05-113-05/2012 Between Public Prosecutor A

    (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. S-05-113-05/2012 Between Public Prosecutor A

    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. S-05-113-05/2012 Between Public Prosecutor ……Appellant And Bernadito L. Alenjandro Jr ...…Respondent [In the matter of High Court of Sabah and Sarawak, in Sandakan, Sabah. Criminal Trial No. S-45-04-2011] Between Public Prosecutor And Bernadito L. Alenjandro Jr CORAM AZAHAR MOHAMED, JCA LINTON ALBERT, JCA DAVID WONG DAK WAH, JCA 1 GROUNDS OF DECISION The 14th January 2011 began on a happy note for the respondent who was invited to one Joel Mateo’s birthday party at his estate quarters, opposite to where the respondent stayed. He and his wife went early in the morning to help in the preparations at Joel Mateo’s house. In conjunction with the birthday party there was a long drinking session which ended in a fight resulting in the respondent inflicting serious injury to Renato S. Harder (the deceased) who succumbed to the injury and less serious injuries to James Jimeno who survived. The respondent was subsequently charged for offences under the Penal Code. The first charge read as follows : “That you, on the 14th day of January 2011, at around 7.00 pm to 8.00 pm, at Kongsi Pekerja No. 15D, Ladang Mewah 2, in the District of Kinabatangan, in the State of Sabah, did commit murder by causing the death of one RENATO S. HARDER (M) and thereby commit an offence punishable under section 302 of the Penal Code.” The second charge read : 2 “That you, on the 14th day of January 2011, at around 7.00 pm to 8.00 pm, at kongsi Pekerja No.