DOCSLIB.ORG

NZMJ 1515.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NZMJ 1515.Indd EDITORIAL The Government’s proposal to legalise cannabis in New Zealand: 10 key questions Chris Wilkins, Marta Rychert national referendum on the legal information (eg, price, product range) and status of recreational cannabis use “advice and recommendations” about A and supply in New Zealand will be products from within retail outlets. There held at the next general election in Sep- will be a home cultivation limit of two tember 2020.1 The referendum will involve cannabis plants per person or four plants voting to support or oppose the Coalition per household. Social sharing of up to 14 Government’s recently released fi nal draft grams of cannabis will be permitted. The of the Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill CLCB will prohibit the public consumption (CLCB).2,3 The Government has indicated that of cannabis; the sale of cannabis products they will conduct a public education cam- with alcohol and tobacco; and any impor- paign in the months leading up to the refer- tation of cannabis. endum to inform voters about the details of 1. What will be the price of legal the proposal.2,3 The aim of this editorial is to highlight a number of key questions arising cannabis? Alcohol and tobacco research has shown from the fi nal CLCB release, and to raise that price is a particularly strong infl uence wider issues relating to the regulation and on level of consumption and related harm, enforcement of the proposed legal cannabis and, contrary to popular belief, heavy and market that go beyond the Bill. Our purpose younger users are particularly sensitive is to stimulate public discussion and inform to price.4–6 Cannabis is essentially a basic the upcoming public education campaign. agricultural crop, and drug policy analysts We believe the questions raised will be of have suggested that under legal production interest to readers regardless of whether conditions its price could conceivably fall they currently support or oppose cannabis to a fraction of the current black market legalisation. price.7 The price of legal cannabis in US Overview of the Cannabis states has declined by as much as 50% Legalisation and Control Bill since legalisation, refl ecting economies As proposed by the CLCB, the purchase of scale of legal production and growing and use of cannabis will be restricted to market competition.7–9 The CLCB includes those 20 years or older (two years older a provision to set an excise tax on different than the alcohol purchase age). There will cannabis products based on weight and THC be a daily purchase and possession limit content, but no indication of the level of the of 14 grams of cannabis per user. Sales respective product excise rate (cl269(2)). of cannabis will be restricted to licensed The key question is will the cannabis excise physical stores only (ie, no mail order be similar to beer (approx. 10% retail price) or internet sales), and there will also be and wine (15%), or more like the excise rate separate licensed public consumption on spirits (38%) or tobacco (76%)? A high premises for those who cannot consume at legal price for cannabis will reduce legal home (eg, people in shared living arrange- consumption and harm, and may make ments or renters). Advertising will be non-commercial legal home growing more banned except for the provision of objective attractive. Conversely, high legal prices NZMJ 22 May 2020, Vol 133 No 1515 ISSN 1175-8716 © NZMA 9 www.nzma.org.nz/journal EDITORIAL may encourage purchasing from the black types. Furthermore, given the evidence of market. Yet, the legal cannabis market cannabis concentrates overseas, are these will provide a range of advantages beyond products consistent with the harm reduction strictly price, including convenience, safety objectives of the CLCB? and the absence of legal risk. Legal cannabis 3. How strictly will retail outlets be regimes that place too high a priority on reducing the black market will encourage regulated? Alcohol and tobacco research has shown weak regulatory regimes that generate high that higher outlet density and longer health costs.10 opening hours are associated with higher One way to address declining prices in levels of consumption and harm.5,15,16 Similar legal cannabis markets is to mandate a set results have been found for proximity to minimum price per unit, as has been imple- medicinal cannabis dispensaries.15,17,18 New mented in some countries for alcohol. The Zealand’s recent attempt to establish a CLCB includes a provision to raise the excise regulated commercial market for so-called for cannabis for a maximum period of 12 “legal highs” under the Psychoactive months if the price falls too much (cl263(2)). Substances Act 2013 (PSA) highlighted a However, the power is discretionary, time number of issues with retail outlets.19 The limited, and has no set minimum price for PSA required the development of Local when it would be activated. Approved Products Policies (LAPP) that set 2. What will be the maximum minimum physical distances between stores potency of products? and sensitive sites such as schools (often Historically, the THC level of cannabis 500 metres), but the PSA did not include any plant material from the black market has limits on the number of outlets or opening 19 been around 5–10%, but enhanced hydro- hours. As a consequence, some central ponic cultivation techniques have produced Auckland legal high stores operated on a 20 potencies as high as 15–20%.11,12 In US legal near 24-hour basis. cannabis markets, new cannabis concentrate Under the CLCB, the central government products with THC levels of over 50–60% Cannabis Regulatory Authority is tasked with have become increasingly popular.9,14 developing local license premise policies for Studies of higher potency cannabis, every district and city council in the country including concentrates, have found higher (ie, 67 territorial authorities in total). These risk of psychosis, psychosis relapse and policies will provide guidance with respect dependency.13,14 The CLCB includes a to the location and opening hours of retail maximum THC potency of cannabis plant of outlets (cl16(2)) and must take into account 15% THC (Schedule 8). This cap appears to the characteristics of the territory, location of be at the higher end of the levels currently sensitive sites (eg, schools, churches, sports found in the black market. The CLCB also facilities) and whether a retail outlet will includes provision for the sale of cannabis reduce the “amenity and good order” of the edibles and extracts (concentrates), but territory (cl16(3)). The Authority is required indicates these products will initially not be to “consult” with “local persons and groups approved (Schedule 7). The CLCB includes who may be affected” and local government potency levels for these products (Schedule authorities (cl16(6)(7)), but it is not clear 8), but they are expressed as milligrams “per what role local government will play and unit” and “per package”, and these terms the infl uence these local groups will have. are not defi ned. Furthermore, the potency During the PSA, there were a number of caps outlined in the CLCB do not appear to instances where there was a clear disconnect apply to home grown cannabis, creating between central government licensing of the potential for social sharing of higher legal high outlets and local government and potency products and leakage to the black community concerns about these outlets, market. The possibility of future concentrate indicating the need for early engagement and edible sales raises the question of what and communication of policy aims between will be the cap on potency on these product central and local government.19,21,22 NZMJ 22 May 2020, Vol 133 No 1515 ISSN 1175-8716 © NZMA 10 www.nzma.org.nz/journal EDITORIAL 4. Which government agency will to issue an infringement notice than administer the new sector? proceed with an arrest under the previous approach.25 Cannabis users were also The CLCB establishes the Cannabis Regu- continued to be convicted and imprisoned latory Authority to regulate the new regime for non-payment of infringement notices.26,27 but does not state which government agency One way the CLCB could improve the like- will administer the new legal recreational lihood of payment of infringement fees is cannabis sector. This will be key to how to lower the fees set for infringements and/ the sector is perceived and regulated.23 or provide non-fi nancial resolution options, Government agencies with any kind of such as attending a cannabis education economic development mission (ie, business, session or completing community work. innovation or tourism agencies) will place greater emphasis on facilitating cannabis 6. How will purchase and business growth and jobs. For example, the possession limits be enforced? gaming machine regime is regulated by the The CLCB proposes a daily cannabis Ministry of Internal Affairs and they have purchase limit of 14 grams per day shown a willingness to respond to the needs (considered by offi cials to be suffi cient for of the gaming industry.24 Alternatively, a a week of regular use) (cl29). It is not clear health agency is more likely to focus on the how such a daily purchasing limit will be adverse health outcomes from cannabis use. enforced in practice without a real-time 5. How will the cannabis retail system that includes all retail outlets infringement scheme be operated? and collects personal identifying infor- mation from buyers to prevent them The CLCB includes provisions for civil purchasing the maximum daily quantity infringement fees of $200–$500 (NZD) for from multiple retail outlets. In Uruguay, a exceeding the 14-gram personal possession biometric system requires registered buyers or purchase limit, exceeding the personal to submit a thumbprint before making a plant cultivation limit, and for public use purchase.28,29 In New Zealand, police already and public cultivation (Part 3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Product Disclosure Statement Initial Public Offering of Ordinary Shares in Rua Bioscience Limited
    Product Disclosure Statement Initial Public Offering of ordinary shares in Rua Bioscience Limited This document gives you important information about this investment to help you 25th September 2020 decide whether you want to invest. There is other useful information about this offer on LEAD MANAGER CO-MANAGER disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz/. Rua Bioscience Limited has prepared this document in accordance with the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. You can also seek advice from a financial adviser to help you to make an investment decision. 2 RUA Bioscience Limited • Key information summary Key information summary 1.1 Rua has secured a sales agreement with leading German wholesale importer and distributor Nimbus Health GmbH What is this? (Nimbus), and has developed two commercial-scale facilities: a controlled cultivation facility in Ruatorea and an extraction This is an offer of ordinary shares (Offer Shares) in Rua and manufacturing facility in Gisborne. By prioritising Bioscience Limited (Rua or the Company). Ordinary shares in wholesale exports in the short term, Rua intends to generate Rua give you a stake in the ownership of Rua. You may receive revenue to support its on-going investment into a range of long a return if dividends are paid or Rua increases in value and you term value opportunities, including genetics research, product are able to sell your Shares at a higher price than you paid development, clinical trials and brand development. for them. Rua holds a Medicinal Cannabis Licence from New Zealand’s If Rua runs into financial difficulties and is wound up, you will Medicinal Cannabis Agency, permitting it to operate in be paid only after all creditors have been paid.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Perspective on the Legalisation Debate: the Dutch Case
    AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE LEGALISATION DEBATE: THE DUTCH CASE Martijn Adriaan Boermans* Introduction Understanding the consequences of drug legalisation versus prohibition is important for policy. Most recently this subject has gained much political attention not only globally, but specifically in the Netherlands.1 This study will provide a contribution to the legalisation debate based on a microeconomic analysis of the effects of illegal markets. The research question is how to design a coherent soft drugs policy framework that maximizes social welfare within the Netherlands that precludes most historical, sociological and political debates. In particular, attention is restricted to ‘soft drugs’ better known as cannabis derived products like hashish and marijuana.2 The focus is on the Dutch case, since traditionally the Netherlands has been a forerunner in terms of drug-related policies, as exemplified by coffeeshops. In a country with a population of 16 million about 1 million indicate to use soft drugs on a regular basis. Almost all consumers buy soft drugs in coffeeshops.3 Interestingly, there is no stereotypical Dutch soft drug consumer, since users are representative of the Dutch population, for example in terms of education levels. Prices vary between 150-250 euro per * M.A. Boermans, MPhil, is a PhD Candidate and works for the Innovation and Business Centre (InnBus) at the Hogeschool Utrecht where he also is Lecturer. His other works include economic papers on international trade. He holds a research master degree in Multidisciplinary Economics from the Universiteit Utrecht and obtained his undergraduate degree from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Corresponding email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis in New Zealand Perceptions of Use, Users and Policy
    Cannabis in New Zealand perceptions of use, users and policy Geoff Noller A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Otago, Christchurch Aotearoa, New Zealand November 5, 2008 ABSTRACT Introduction Despite humanity’s lengthy relationship with psychoactive substances, their consumption in contemporary societies is perceived as highly problematic. Cannabis, the most commonly imbibed illicit psychotropic, has come to embody these concerns. Medical and scientific research informs notions of use and user, with these being further constructed in the public realm by law, the media and policy against a backdrop of health deficits and other harms including risk taking, criminality and deviance. With many studies drawing on clinical populations, e.g. high intensity users or those in treatment, a pathologized view of the user predominates. Where general population studies incorporate user data, these typically concentrate on the epidemiology of use: frequency, intensity, duration, and symptoms of abuse and dependence. This, however, tells us little about the meaning of use for users or why use continues despite universal official disapprobation. A lack of studies incorporating user perspectives thus ensures the limited focus of much present research and a policy accent on supply reduction at the expense of harm minimisation and safe use education. Those choosing to continue use are stigmatised as deviant or dependant. This has the effect of further bolstering enforcement, a strategy showing little evidence of efficacy. The present study sought a comparison between this dominant discourse on cannabis use and the perspectives of users, with a range of exploratory hypotheses being identified. Method Eighty cannabis-using respondents participated in open-ended face-to-face interviews, of which seventy-six successfully completed a follow-up questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Mattersofsubstance
    Mattersof Substance. august 2015 Volume 26 Issue No.3 www.drugfoundation.org.nz Taking the pulse of Māori public health Restoring equality and addressing health outcomes for Ma¯ori comes with many challenges. CONTENts FEATURE Taking the STORY pulse of 18 Māori public health COVER: Health inequalities for Mäori remain, but much progress is being made getting the right sort of help COVER ABOUT STORY 06 28 A DRUG WORLD NEWS FEATURE: 02 THE CRUEL C 14 $ $ $ $ ? FEATURES Become 06 14 18 24 a member Taking the pulse of The cruel C The UNGASS A school’s Maori public health With hepatitis C rates 2016 primer core business The New Zealand Drug Foundation has Health inequalities for growing, is there any A comprehensive Focusing on a positive school been at the heart of major alcohol and Mäori remain, but much relief in sight? introduction to the environment means alcohol other drug policy debates for over 20 years. progress is being made UN’s special session on and other drugs aren’t such During that time, we have demonstrated getting the right sort the world drug problem a big deal at Ötaki College a strong commitment to advocating of help policies and practices based on the best evidence available. You can help us. A key strength of the Drug Foundation lies in its diverse membership REGULARS base. As a member of the Drug Foundation, you will receive information about major The Director’s Cut 01 alcohol and other drug policy challenges. You can also get involved in our work to 30 34 36 Events 01 find solutions to those challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • How Fluctuations in the Value of Cocaine Markets Influence the Recourse to Lethal Violence
    International Ph.D. in Criminology – Ph.D. Thesis UNIVERSITÁ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE MILANO Dottorato di ricerca in Criminologia Ciclo XXIX S.S.D: SPS/12 Shrinking businesses and expanding graveyards: how fluctuations in the value of cocaine markets influence the recourse to lethal violence Tesi di Dottorato di: Alberto Aziani Matricola: 4 2 1 2 2 2 7 Anno Accademico 2015/2016 International Ph.D. in Criminology – Ph.D. Thesis International Ph.D. in Criminology – Ph.D. Thesis Cycle XXIX Shrinking businesses and expanding graveyards: how fluctuations in the value of cocaine markets influence the recourse to lethal violence Ph.D. Thesis Alberto Aziani Academic Year 2015/2016 International Ph.D. in Criminology – Ph.D. Thesis International Ph.D. in Criminology – Ph.D. Thesis 5 International Ph.D. in Criminology – Ph.D. Thesis Abstract Many scholars have investigated the escalation of violence associated with drug trafficking. Despite the plethora of literature, limited attention has been paid to the consequences of fluctuations in the value of markets. This study addresses this lacuna in extant research by proposing an original estimate of the gross value added of cocaine markets in 151 countries between the period 1998-2013, taking into consideration both national and international dimensions of cocaine trafficking through recourse to a flow/network approach. In conjunction with this, the fluctuation of the gross value added of the cocaine market is examined in terms of an etiological factor in the upsurge of interpersonal lethal violence. The analysis demonstrates how expansions and contractions of the gross value added in cocaine markets are significant determinants of the level of violence within the respective countries that constitute the global cocaine network.
    [Show full text]
  • Mattersofsubstance
    Mattersof Substance. february 2013 Volume 24 Issue No.1 www.drugfoundation.org.nz Future drugs All around the world, things are rapidly changing. There are signs the War on Drugs may be running out of steam, new technologies promise new treatment possibilities, and scientific developments may be altering the very nature of drugs themselves. Here in New Zealand, bold new policy initiatives mean the treatment landscape will soon look vastly different. CONTENTS Future ABOUT A DRUG FEATURE: drugs 16 BI INTO BINGE CoveR: slowly the world COVER is starting to realise the STORY FEATURE: 26 War on Drugs has failed. RUSSIAN What does the future hold for 06 DRUG drug policy and recovery? POLICY 22 NZ NEWS BI BINGE? 02 Future drug policy treatments drugs FEATURES Become 20 22 26 30 a member The Drug War Crime and punishment: Putting the ‘bi’ How we see things in retreat? the sorry state of into binge from our front gate The NZ Drug Foundation has been at The UN has been forced to Russian drug policy Recent reports about In 2011, Russell School the heart of major alcohol and other act on the War on Drugs. Russia treats its addicted bisexual binge drinking are became the centre for a drug policy debates for over 20 years. Where to from here? citizens with cruelty. flawed and the reporting battle against Big Alcohol. During that time, we have demonstrated What’s going on behind ridiculous. What’s actually Where is it at now? a strong commitment to advocating the Iron Curtain? going on? policies and practices based on the best evidence available.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Structure for Recreational Cannabis
    BERL REPORTS MINISTRY OF JUSTICE DISCLAIMER JUSTICE 1. This report was prepared by Business and Economic Research Limited (BERL), under commission from the Ministry of OFJustice. 2. The views, opinions, recommendations, and advice expressed in this report belong solely to the authors of the report. The views do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of Justice or the New Zealand Government. 3. The report was one of a number of inputsMINISTRY considered by the Ministry in the development of the draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill. The overarching objective of the regulatory framework, which is set out in theTHE draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, is to reduce the harms associated with cannabis use experienced byBY individuals, families, whānau, and communities in New Zealand. In developing the model, harm reduction was preferred over other considerations, including economic ones. 4. The report is not part of the Ministry of Justice’s public information campaign for the referendums. RELEASED PROACTIVELY Lot JUSTICE OF MINISTRY THE BY RELEASED Market structure for recreational cannabis Poutū-te-rangi 2020 berl.co.nz PROACTIVELY JUSTICE OF MINISTRY THE BY Authors: Hillmarè Schulze,RELEASED Sam Green, and Hugh Dixon All work is done, and services rendered at the request of, and for the purposes of the client only. Neither BERL nor any of its employees accepts any responsibility on any grounds whatsoever, including negligence, to any other person. While every effort is made by BERL to ensure that the information, opinions and forecasts provided to the client are accurate and reliable, BERL shall not be liable for any adverse consequences of the client’s decisions made in reliance of any report provided by BERL, nor shall BERL be held to have given or implied any warranty as to whether any report provided by BERL will assist in the performance of the client’s functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Get Real About Drugs
    LET’S GET REAL ABOUT DRUGS Cannabis: Just legalise it Regulating cannabis to reduce harm We need to get real about cannabis. Countries all around the world are realising that prohibition causes more harm than it prevents, and are moving to develop a regulated legal market. With 35% of Australians having used cannabis, it’s time we listened to health experts and joined those countries. The Australian Greens would redefine cannabis as a legal substance for adult use in a tightly regulated market, to reduce harm, increase protections for vulnerable populations, and redirect resources into treatment. - Interaction with criminal dealers rather than trained > CANNABIS PROHIBITION HAS FAILED professionals in safe, regulated outlets is putting people at risk and meaning the cannabis products they purchase are Every year in Australia, both the consumption of cannabis and of unknown strength and quality; arrests associated with its use continue to rise. 35% of - Funds directed into ineffective law enforcement responses Australians have used cannabis,1 and according to the latest to drug use, rather than drug education and health services; statistics from the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, and cannabis accounts for the greatest proportion of illicit drug - The criminal market for cannabis has led to more harmful arrests across Australia – rising 6% from 75,105 in 2014–15 to a strains which contain high levels of THC record 79,643 in 2015–16.2 These statistics show that, despite (tetrahydrocannabinol) and low CBD (cannabidiol). the current illegality of cannabis, Australians choose to use it. The reality of this choice is that millions of Australians are > INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND forced to buy cannabis of unknown quality or strength from criminal drug dealers, or grow cannabis plants at home illegally.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Evaluating Changes in Cannabis Polices: Insights from The
    TECHNICAL REPORT Monitoring and evaluating changes in cannabis policies: insights from the Americas January 2020 I Legal notice This publication of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) is protected by copyright. The EMCDDA accepts no responsibility or liability for any consequences arising from the use of the data contained in this document. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the EMCDDA’s partners, any EU Member State or any agency orinstitution of the European Union. PDF ISBN 978-92-9497-461-7 doi: 10.2810/151487 TD-02-20-009-EN-N Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2020 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Recommended citation: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2020), Monitoring and evaluating changes in cannabis policies: insights from the Americas, Technical report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. About this report This report provides an overview of the changes in cannabis policies in the Americas and the evidence emerging from evaluations of their impact. Highlighting the challenges in monitoring and evaluating regulatory changes in the drugs field, it will be of particular interest to those involved in planning or evaluating any changes to cannabis regulation. About the EMCDDA The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) is the central source and confirmed authority on drug-related issues in Europe. For over 20 years, it has been collecting, analysing and disseminating scientifically sound information on drugs and drug addiction and their consequences, providing its audiences with an evidence-based picture of the drug phenomenon at European level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highs and Lows of Cannabis Law Reform
    THE HIGHS AND LOWS OF CANNABIS LAW REFORM Presented by the Equal Justice Project Access Team 2020 Written By: Hurya Ahmad, Greer Bonnette, Jonathan de Jongh, Vivian del Carpio, Gwen Hamilton, Jungwon Jo, Amanda Joshua, Jayna Lee, Tanzeel Patel, Kannu Sachdev, Jess Thwaites-Hardy and Helena Wiseman Special thanks to the Equal Justice Project Communications team for their assistance in editing and compilation This work was undertaken by several volunteers of the Equal Justice Project based on personal research from a variety of official and unofficial sources. No information within this symposium paper will be understood as official. The Equal Justice Project makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The Equal Justice Project will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. THE HIGHS AND LOWS OF THE CANNABIS REFERENDUM CONTENTS Historical Development on the Law on Cannabis in New Zealand 1 Current Legislation 2 Current Policy 3 International Comparison 4 Recreational Use and Regulation 5 Arguments for the Bill 6 1. Regulation 2. Improved Justice Outcomes 3. Economic Benefits Arguments against the Bill 7 1. The Black Market 2. Adverse Effects on Youth 3. Employment Issues THE HIGHS AND LOWS OF THE CANNABIS REFERENDUM HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT The history of cannabis legislation in New Zealand reveals various paradigm shifts in the law over time. The country was one of the very few areas where the United Kingdom discouraged CONTENTS industrial hemp production, as the harakeke plant was thought to be an adequate alternative for fibre.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Controlled Substances
    The Analysis of Controlled Substances. Michael D. Cole Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBNs: 0-471-49252-3 (HB); 0-471-49253-1 (PB) THE ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES Analytical Techniques in the Sciences (AnTS) Series Editor: David J. Ando, Consultant, Dartford, Kent, UK A series of open learning/distance learning books which covers all of the major analytical techniques and their application in the most important areas of physical, life and materials sciences. Titles available in the Series Analytical Instrumentation: Performance Characteristics and Quality Graham Currell, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK Fundamentals of Electroanalytical Chemistry Paul M.S. Monk, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK Introduction to Environmental Analysis Roger N. Reeve, University of Sunderland, UK Polymer Analysis Barbara H. Stuart, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia Chemical Sensors and Biosensors Brian R. Eggins, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Northern Ireland, UK Methods for Environmental Trace Analysis John R. Dean, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry: An Introduction Robert E. Ardrey, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK The Analysis of Controlled Substances Michael D. Cole, Anglia Polytechnic University, Cambridge, UK Forthcoming Titles Infrared Spectroscopy: Experimentation and Applications Barbara H. Stuart, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia THE ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES Michael D. Cole Anglia Polytechnic University, Cambridge,
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Public Health Strategies Related to Cannabis Use and the Most Appropriate Legal Status
    I.6C Inquiry into the public health strategies related to cannabis use and the most appropriate legal status Report of the Health Committee Forty-seventh Parliament (Steve Chadwick, Chairperson) August 2003 Presented to the House of Representatives I.6C INQUIRY INTO HEALTH STRATEGIES AND LEGAL OPTIONS FOR CANNABIS Contents Summary of recommendations to the Government 4 Summary of recommendations to the House 6 Conduct of the inquiry 8 Findings 8 Structure of the report 9 Part 1 Background information 12 Patterns of cannabis use in New Zealand 12 Potency of cannabis 14 Findings on cannabis-related harm 15 Mental illness 17 Behavioural effects 19 Respiratory problems 19 Associated harms 21 Well-being 21 The ‘gateway’ hypothesis 21 Cannabis and alcohol compared 23 Driving under the influence of cannabis 24 Cannabis and Māori 25 Cannabis economy 30 Enforcement of prohibition in New Zealand 31 Search and seizure without warrant 34 Part 2 Public health and health promotion strategies to minimise the use of, and harm associated with, cannabis 37 Submitters’ views of public health strategies 37 Community action programmes 41 Māori-controlled initiatives 43 Drug education: school-based programmes 45 Part 3 Legal status of cannabis in New Zealand 48 Scale of harm 48 Legislative options for cannabis 50 Prohibition with an exemption for medicinal purposes 54 Legislative options for general use 57 Option A: Prohibition 57 Option B: Prohibition with an exemption for medicinal purposes 58 2 INQUIRY INTO HEALTH STRATEGIES AND LEGAL OPTIONS FOR CANNABIS
    [Show full text]