ENVIRONMENTAL PLANS VOLUME 8

ENVIRONMENTAL ALIGNMENT SHEET PACKAGE FOR THE TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE ULC TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT NEB CONDITION 72

October 2017 REV 4 687945 01-13283-SG-0000-CHE-DWG-0001 R4

Prepared for:

Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. Suite 2700, 300 – 5th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 5J2 Ph: 403-514-6400 Visual Guide to TMEP’s Environmental Plans to the NEB Conditions Related to the Environmental Protection Plan

Trans Mountain’s environmental program during construction is presented in ten volumes of the Environmental Plans as shown in the visual guide below. The Environmental Plans will be implemented by contractors and Environmental Inspectors during all phases of construction. Consequently the ten volumes of plans cover all aspects of Environmental Management. To demonstrate compliance with NEB Conditions, Trans Mountain will file the Environmental Plans with the NEB. To clarify how TMEP’s Environmental Plan Volumes relate to Condition documents filed with the NEB please see the table below.

Trans Mountain Expansion Project Guide to the Environmental Plans

Environmental Plans NEB Condition and Filing ID Volume 1 – Temporary Construction Lands and 78 Facilities Environmental Protection Plan Infrastructure Environmental Protection Plan Volume 2 – Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan 72 Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan Volume 3 – Facilities Environmental Protection Plan 78 Facilities Environmental Protection Plan Volume 4 – Westridge Marine Terminal Environmental 81 Westridge Environmental Protection Plan Protection Plan Volume 5 – Reactivation Environmental Protection Plan 72 Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan Volume 6 – Environmental Management Plans 72 Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan 78 Facilities Environmental Protection Plan 81 Westridge Environmental Protection Plan Volume 7 – Resource-Specific Mitigation Tables 72 Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan Volume 8 – Environmental Alignment Sheets 72 Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan Volume 9 – Burnaby Mountain Tunneling Environmental 72 Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan Protection Plan Volume 10 – Compliance Management Plan 72 Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan 78 Facilities Environmental Protection Plan 81 Westridge Environmental Protection Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL ALIGNMENT SHEET GUIDE

GENERAL INFORMATION

The Environmental Alignment Sheets (EAS) provide information pertaining to the environmental and socio-economic setting above the Photomosaic. Potential environmental and socio-economic issues identified during Project planning, and their corresponding mitigation measures, are positioned below their respective location on the Photomosaic. Resource-specific Environmental Notes are included below the Photomosaic outlining mitigation measures to be implemented during construction of the Project as described in the Environmental Plans, specifically the Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan (Pipeline EPP) (Volume 2 of the Environmental Plans), the Environmental Management Plans (Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans) and the Resource-Specific Mitigation Tables (Volume 7 of the Environmental Plans). The mitigation measures included on these Index Sheets do not include all of the potential mitigation measures that may be implemented. Consult the Environmental Plans for additional protection measures as necessary. Drawings can be found in Appendix C of the Pipeline EPP.

Environmental and Socio-Economic Setting Information Environmental Protection Applicable EAS Note Applicable Resource-Specific Mitigation Table EAS Band1 (Above Photomosaic) (Below Photomosaic) (Index Sheet #) (Volume 7 of the Environmental Plans) Jurisdiction Regional, municipal or provincial jurisdictional authority N/A N/A N/A Land Ownership Indicates whether land is Private or Crown Land as encountered by the trench line N/A N/A N/A Line List (Tract Numbers) Reference to land parcel identification numbers as encountered by the trench line N/A N/A N/A Hydrology (Wetlands and Watercourses) Watercourse and drainage crossings, watercourse crossing class, fish presence, species Pipeline and equipment/vehicle crossing methods for watercourses, drainages and See AQ Notes 1 to 5 (Index Sheets 4 and 5) Section 6.0 (Wetlands) provides locations and site-specific mitigation for wetland features. This section also at risk presence, navigability status channels. Recommendations are specified for non-frozen conditions and assume the See WT-Notes 1 to 4 (Index Sheet 4) includes information on wetland class, area of wetland in the Project footprint and other pertinent information Crossing Recommendations presence of water. Additional recommendations for dry or frozen conditions are located in Section 7.0 (Watercourses/Hydrology) provides location and names of watercourses crossed by the pipeline Watercourse (Pipeline: Vehicle) and Classification of wetlands encountered by the construction footprint the watercourse crossing summary table route. This section also includes information on watercourse class, sensitivity rating, water quality monitoring Wetland Measures to be implemented for wetlands requirement, fish presence, Least Risk Biological Window, pipeline and vehicle crossing methods, riparian area Measures to address navigable and potentially navigable waterbodies and other pertinent information to watercourses. This section also includes information on location and mitigation measures for groundwater features and water wells identified in the vicinity of the Project Footprint Riparian Habitat Coloured band indicating the riparian habitat and site-specific riparian buffer area for Locations where coarse woody debris will be placed during reclamation of the pipeline N/A Section 10.0 (Reclamation – Coarse Woody Debris Volumes) provides locations and volumes for the placement watercourses (dark blue) and wetlands (light blue) of coarse woody debris following construction Terrestrial Features Important wildlife habitat, critical habitat ranges, site-specific features and wildlife habitat Measures to address wildlife habitat, critical habitat ranges, site-specific features and See WF-Notes 1 to WF-Note 8 (Index Sheets 3 and Section 4.0 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat provides locations and site-specific mitigation measures for wildlife on federal lands wildlife habitat on federal lands 4) features and habitat areas, as well as information on timing restrictions (where applicable), recommended setback distances as well as identified species at risk Rare vascular plants, mosses and liverworts, and lichens, rare ecological communities and Measures to mitigate impacts to rare plants, plant communities/ecosystems, lichens, See VG-Note 1 to VG-Note 6 (Index Sheet 4) Section 5.0 Vegetation provides locations and site-specific mitigation measures for rare plant and rare critical habitat ranges. Old Growth Management Areas (OGMAs) are identified in British liverworts, critical habitat areas and OGMAs ecological communities, critical habitat ranges, locations and details for Old Growth Management Areas Columbia. Cryptogamic Crust Salvage location are identified in British Columbia. (OGMAs), as well as areas of high weed density Areas of high weed density Areas where soil containment should occur due to high weed density N/A Socio-Economic Considerations Select agricultural operations, soil borne pathogens, and socio-economic features Measures to address agricultural impacts and soil borne pathogens See AG-Note 1 to AG-Note 10 (Index Sheet 2 and 3) Section 1.0 Socio-Economics and Agriculture provides approximate locations and details for socio-economic features, agricultural features, and biosecurity concerns See AK-Note 1 and TLU-Note 1 for heritage and Section 2.0 Heritage Resources provides approximate locations (buffered) for heritage features Buffered ranges of known archeological or paleontological concerns and areas with known Measures being considered through ongoing consultation with applicable regulators and TLRU, respectively (Index Sheet 3) Section 3.0 Traditional Land and Resource Use provides approximate locations (buffered) and mitigation traditional land and resource use (TLRU) values communities measures for traditional land and resource use features that are being considered in ongoing discussions with applicable regulators and communities Other Environmental Considerations Areas with groundwater concerns, moderate and high risk potential to encounter Measures to be implemented in areas with groundwater concerns See HY-Note 1 (Index Sheet 5) Section 7.0 (Watercourses/Hydrology) provides locations and mitigation measures for areas where groundwater contamination, site-specific watercourse drawings, shallow bedrock and acid rock drainage Measures to be implemented in areas with potential for acid generating rock and Shallow See GEO-Note 1 and GEO-Note 2 (Index Sheet 5) features have been identified. potential bedrock. Section 8.0 Soils/Geology provides locations and details on soil types encountered and their characteristics. Measures to be implemented in areas with moderate and high risk potential for See SO-Note 8 (Index Sheet 6) This section also includes locations with potential for acid-generating rock contamination Drawing reference for the site-specific watercourse crossing detail Soil Parent Material2 Soil parent material from which current soils have evolved N/A - Soil types, along with expected topsoil thickness and slope class are indicated on the N/A See Sections 8.0 (Soils/Geology) photomosaic Land Use Predominant land use at the time of survey N/A N/A N/A Reclamation Unit Site-specific reclamation units associated with vegetative cover, biogeoclimatic zone (BC), Recommended seed mix for the reclamation unit N/A Section 9.0 Reclamation – Seed Mix provides locations and details of the reclamation units including Reclamation Seed Mix and soil profile corresponding Biogeoclimatic (BC) zones, subzones, and descriptions of land use and setting as well as recommended seed mixes Construction Work Window N/A - Assigned to site-specific watercourses and wildlife features mentioned in the Wildlife Allowable work window or least risk biological window for site-specific environmental N/A Sections 4.0 (Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat) and 7.1 (Watercourses) provides information pertaining to and Wildlife Habitat and Hydrology bands features recommended construction timing windows for wildlife and aquatic construction work windows, respectively Proximity to TMPL N/A - TMPL is shown on the photomosaic Distance between the existing TMPL line and the proposed TMEP trench line N/A N/A Soil Handling - Stripping Depth2 N/A - Soil salvage depths are depicted on the photomosaic Recommended topsoil/root zone material depths to be used as a guide during soil handling N/A See Section 8.1 (Soils) Soil Handling – Procedure2 N/A - Pipeline construction footprint is shown on the photomosaic Recommended topsoil salvage width for non-frozen ground conditions. Does not account N/A See Section 8.1 (Soils) for site-specific features that may require alternative soil handling procedures Soil Erosion2 N/A - Soil units are depicted on the photomosaic Soil erosion by wind and water controls and/or alleviation measures See SO-Notes 1 and 6 (Index Sheet 6) See Section 8.1 (Soils) Other Soil Considerations2 Measures to address compaction and rutting, poor-quality lower subsoils, topsoil berms, See SO-Notes 2, 4, 5, and 7 (Index Sheet 6) See Section 8.1 (Soils) and areas not surveyed for soil Trench Stability2 Flagging of potential for trench instability See SO-Note 3 (Index Sheet 6) See Section 8.1 (Soils) Contamination Risk Coloured band indicating areas with moderate and high risk contamination. High risk areas Measures to address contaminated soil or water. See SO-Note 4 (Index Sheet 6) See Section 8.3 (Contamination) that have been sampled are verified in this band Species of Concern N/A Coloured band to show vegetation and wildlife species of concern -- -- Notes: 1 For better presentation and to avoid information clusters on the EAS, environmental and socio-economical features have been grouped at many locations. 2 In cases where there are multiple soil types along the construction footprint, soil properties encountered along the trench line are shown in the environmental protection bands. It is recommended that the Contractor reviews the properties of all the soil breaks within the same areas.

INDEX SHEET 1 of 9

GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES

TOPSOIL/ROOT ZONE MATERIAL STRIPPING ACCESS MANAGEMENT

Where soils are not readily distinguishable by colour, salvage a minimum of 10 cm from all lands, except for areas of disturbed land, areas Candidate access management locations have been identified on the map face of the Alignment sheets with an “AC- “prefix followed by a with rocky outcrops (unless otherwise specified), and treed areas, which have root zone material stripped to a minimum of 15 cm. Salvage unique number, which relates to the unique ID listed in Section 1.4 of the Resource Specific Mitigation Tables (Volume 7 of the Pipeline topsoil/root zone material from the pipeline construction footprint (i.e., trench, spoil storage and work areas) on level terrain, and from all EPP). The candidate locations are approximate; they do not represent the final access control locations. The Environmental Inspectors, in areas to be graded on all land uses during non-frozen conditions or as shown on the Environmental Alignment Sheets. Salvage topsoil to a consultation with the Construction Manager or designate, will use the candidate locations and the decision frameworks in the Access maximum depth of 40 cm, unless a greater depth is specifically noted for selected soils. During Frozen conditions, salvage topsoil/root zone Management Plan (Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans) to identify suitable site-specific locations and measures for access management material from all areas being excavated. This includes a minimum of a blade width, or up to 6 m of topsoil/root zone material centred over in the field, based on site-specific conditions. The Alignment sheet map face has a limited view to the area directly around the pipeline the trench in areas where grading is not required. Refer to Section 8.1 in Volume 7 of the Environmental Plans for detailed information right-of-way, therefore not all locations with candidate access management points on the temporary access roads appear on the map. related to topsoil properties. Salvage depth at locations where no topsoil/root zone material depth is specified on the EAS will be determined in the field at the time of the construction based on the discretion of an Environmental Inspector. Areas of thick topsoil may require that the SITE-SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION NOTES topsoil is salvaged from a narrower area and stored as a ramp rather than in a windrow. Mitigation measures for each of the resource-specific features is provided in the Environmental Notes (below). More detailed mitigation General Topsoil Handling Conditions: Salvage topsoil from all areas to be graded and excavated. The area salvaged is to correspond to measures can be found in the Pipeline EPP. The Environmental Notes that follow are associated with potential environmental issues and the area that is to be graded. Topsoil/root zone material must be salvaged on all lands, except for areas of disturbed land and areas with are arranged by discipline in the following categories: rocky outcrops (unless otherwise specified). Implement topsoil handling procedures provided in Section 7.0 and Section 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP (Volume 2 of the Environmental Plans) during topsoil salvage operations. Topsoil salvage procedures to be implemented are described Resource Feature Note Prefix Resource Feature Note Prefix below and provided in the General Topsoil Salvage Procedures Table (below). Agriculture AG Hydrology HY Aquatics AQ Soils SO Land Type Frozen Non-frozen Archaeology AK Traditional Land Use TLU All land uses (except level well-sodded lands and wetlands) Blade Width Full Width Geology (Acid Rock Drainage, Bedrock) GEO Vegetation VG Areas to be graded or excavated and ALR lands in BC Full Width Full Width Wetlands WT Disturbed lands, rocky outcrops (RO soil units) and deep undeveloped Organic soils (e.g., DEV2 soil type) No Salvage No Salvage Wildlife WF

Full Width: Salvage topsoil from the trench and spoil storage areas, and from the pipe makeup, and primary and secondary work lanes of the construction footprint on all locations in non-frozen conditions, to minimize the potential for topsoil/subsoil mixing. Full Width salvage is SOCIO-ECONOMICS AND AGRICULTURE also required during frozen conditions on all Agricultural Land Reserves (ALR) (in British Columbia), where grading is required and areas AG-Note 1: Specialty Field Crops – Ensure production systems continue to operate during construction activities, or provision of suitable where pipe installation cannot be completed on frozen topsoil. The subsoil must be sufficiently decompacted and levelled prior to returning alternatives as needed, and successfully re-established during clean-up. Implement applicable measures outlined in Section 7.0 of the the surface material (topsoil or root zone material) over the areas stripped of this material during clean-up See the following drawings in Pipeline EPP and the Agricultural Management Plan (Section 2.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans). Critical production system Appendix C of the Pipeline EPP: components may include irrigation and drainage lines, power to production facilities and continued access to fields during construction. • Dwg. 7 [Topsoil Salvage on Agriculture Lands – Full Width – Non-Frozen Conditions] • Dwg. 8 [Topsoil/Root Zone Material Salvage in Forest – Full Width – Non-Frozen] AG-Note 2: Livestock Operations – Notify the landowner of the construction schedule in advance to allow for the relocation and • Dwg. 9 [Root Zone Material Salvage (Graded) – Non-Frozen re-establishment of production systems. Implement applicable measures outlined in Section 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP and the Agricultural • Dwg. 11 [Root Zone Material Salvage (Graded) – Frozen] Management Plan. Critical production system components may include water lines, implementing biosecurity protocols, restricting cattle • Dwg. 12 [Sidehill Grading – Wooded] provided in Appendix C of the Pipeline EPP from the construction zone, and maintaining continued access to fields across the pipeline construction footprint during construction. Ensure all water lines, fencing and corral systems are re-established following construction. Half-Width: Salvage topsoil from the trench and spoil storage areas on the construction footprint where the designated workspace does not allow windrowing of the topsoil adjacent to the area being stripped, or in areas where the topsoil is consistently thicker than approximately AG-Note 3: Organic Lands – Implement applicable mitigation measures outlined in the Agricultural Management Plan. Ensure construction 35 cm. The topsoil may need to be stored as a ramp on the work side and will need to be driven on during pipe installation. There may be activities do not threaten the certification of the organic farm, and do not introduce foreign substances (e.g., pesticides, herbicides, limitations for use of the work side if the topsoil becomes wet or saturated and the risk of soil deformation becomes high. If the risk is high, chemicals) unless with prior approval of the landowner and Certification Board. All material imported onto organic lands must meet mats may be required to protect the topsoil from impact during pipe installation. certification requirements and be approved by an Environmental Inspector. Ensure equipment cleaning methods, and weed treatments, are not in contravention with organic land requirements. Blade Width: Salvage topsoil from a blade width (i.e., approximately 4-6 m) centred over the trench (see Dwg. 10 [Topsoil/Root Zone Material Salvage – Blade Width - Frozen Conditions] provided in Appendix C of the Pipeline EPP) on all locations where the topsoil remains AG-Note 4: Cranberry and mixed berry farms – Refer to the line list and special conditions in the landowner agreement for site-specific frozen for the duration of pipe installation (except ALR lands and areas that require grading). Blade width salvage may also be effective on requirements. Detailed mitigation measures have been developed for these farms and are included in the landowner agreement that must well-sodded, level ground where the trench spoil can readily be removed from the spoil storage area without scalping the sod. be reviewed prior to accessing these lands and commencing construction activities.

Modification of Topsoil/Root Zone Material Salvage Width: Refer to Section 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP for mitigation measures pertaining AG-Note 5: Turf farm – Implement applicable measures outlined in Section 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP and the Agricultural Management Plan. to increased/decreased topsoil/root zone material salvage width for the protection of environmental features or topsoil/root zone material Notify landowners in advance of construction to allow turf farm operators the opportunity to remove turf prior to construction. Survey the resources. construction footprint prior to construction to identify irrigation and drainage systems. Maintain irrigation, access and site drainage or ensure provision of alternate sources as needed. Re-establish irrigation, drainage and access following construction. ALTERNATIVE SOILS HANDLING AG-Note 6: Container nursery farms – Maintain water lines, adhere to site-specific biosecurity protocols and ensure continued access is Three-Lift Soils Handling: Salvage topsoil to the width specified in the salvage procedures band. At three-lift soil handling areas, square maintained to container beds during construction as needed. Notify the landowner in advance of construction to allow for the relocation and brackets indicate upper subsoil salvage depths. For example, “20 [30]” indicates 20 cm of topsoil followed by 30 cm of upper, good-quality re-establishment of production systems. If production systems cannot be maintained during construction, ensure provisional systems subsoil to be salvaged. Ensure that the lower lift of poorer-quality spoil is backfilled before the upper lift of good-quality spoil where three-lift (i.e., water lines) are put in place as necessary. Adhere to measures outlined in Section 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP and the Agricultural soils handling has been conducted. Compact the lower lift of spoil prior to backfilling of the upper lift at locations where three-lift soils handling Management Plan. Ensure irrigation, drainage, nursery beds and access are re-established following construction. has been conducted. Refer to Dwg 13 [Topsoil Salvage – Three-Lift Soils Handling on Cultivated Land (Non-Frozen)] provided in Appendix C of the Pipeline EPP.

INDEX SHEET 2 of 9

AG-Note 7: Agricultural Land Reserve British Columbia – Implement the topsoil/root zone material handling measures outlined in Section • British Columbia recommended construction timing windows: 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP and adhere to the applicable permit conditions. Ensure a person with extensive soils handling experience is on site − Bald Eagle – September 1 to December 31; during topsoil handling (salvage and replacement) activities on ALR lands. − Osprey – September 15 to March 31; and AG-Note 8 – Confirmed Soil Borne Pathogens - Adhere to the mitigation measures outlined in the Agricultural Management Plan and the − Other raptors (e.g., red-tailed hawk) – October 1 to February 28. Biosecurity Management Plan (Section 2.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans) and the equipment cleaning measures found in the landowner line lists. Avoid the movement of soil between land uses and quarter-sections to prevent the spread of clubroot spores. Minimize WF-Note 3: Construction Timing – Implement the General Pipeline Construction Mitigation Measures found in Section 7.0 of the Pipeline vehicle travel on topsoil, especially in wet soil conditions. Avoid the use of topsoil imported from clubroot infested or suspected clubroot EPP. Adhere to the Least Risk Window/Timing Constraint applicable to the site-specific wildlife habitat area or habitat feature where feasible. areas. When travelling on foot, remove excess topsoil from footwear and any equipment (e.g., shovels) before moving between cultivated Notify the appropriate authorities if construction activities are scheduled to occur within the timing restriction. Refer to Section 4.2 of the quarter-sections. Ensure all vehicles, (trucks, ATVs) and equipment driving on topsoil or involved in clearing and topsoil handling activities RSMT for the least risk window/timing constraint within provincially identified wildlife areas and Section 4.3 of the RSMT for the least risk arrive on site in a clean condition. During clearing and topsoil handling activities (salvage and replacement), equipment will be mechanically window/timing constraint within critical habitat as identified by Environment and Climate Change Canada. cleaned (Level 1) at designated locations, and pressure washed (Level 2) and disinfected with a 1-2 % bleach solution (Level 3) at designated locations where the risk of clubroot is moderate to high. WF-Note 4: Identified Wildlife Area (Alberta) – Refer to Table 4.2-1 in Section 4.3 of Volume 7 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures. Schedule constructions activities during the recommended construction timing window as provided below. If construction cannot AG-Note 9: Potential Soil Borne Pathogens – Adhere to the mitigation measures in the Agricultural Management Plan and the Biosecurity be scheduled during the recommended window, engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist and consult with AEP to discuss practical options Management Plan, and the equipment cleaning measures found in the landowner line lists. Avoid movement of soil between land uses and and mitigation measures. quarter sections to prevent the potential spread. Ensure all vehicles, (trucks, ATVs) and equipment driving on topsoil or involved in clearing and topsoil handling activities arrive on site in a clean condition. During clearing and topsoil handling activities (salvage and replacement), • Key Wildlife and Biodiversity Zone – recommended construction window of May 1 to January 14. equipment will be mechanically cleaned (Level 1) at designated locations, and pressure washed (Level 2) and disinfected with a 1-2 % • Trumpeter Swan Waterbodies – recommended construction window of October 1 to March 31. bleach solution (Level 3) at designated locations where the risk of clubroot is moderate to high. • Special Access Zone and Grizzly Bear Zone – there is no timing constraint associated with these areas. AG-Note 10: Blueweed Containment Area – No parking of vehicles or equipment on vegetated areas within containment zone. Vehicles and equipment traveling through the containment zone will be cleaned regularly and routinely inspected (undercarriage and wheels) to WF-Note 5: Identified Wildlife Area (BC) – Refer to Table 4.2-2A in Section 4.3 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures. Schedule ensure there is no movement of seed or plant fragments to areas outside the containment zone. Unnecessary access through containment construction activities during the recommended construction timing window where applicable (see below). If construction cannot be zone will be restricted whenever practical. Earth moving equipment will be thoroughly cleaned before leaving the containment zone. Refer scheduled during the recommended window, engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist and consult with BC MFLNRO to discuss practical to the Weed and Vegetation Management Plan (Section 5.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans). options and mitigation measures as necessary.

HERITAGE • Southern Mountain Caribou – Core Range – recommended construction window of January 16 to November 14. AK-Note1: Heritage Site – Refer to Section 2.0 of the Resource-Specific Mitigation Tables (Volume 7 of the Environmental Plans) for site- • Southern Mountain Caribou – Matrix Range – there is no timing constraint associated with this range. specific mitigation requirements. Suspend work in proximity (i.e., within 30 m) of archaeological features (e.g., arrowheads, modified bone, • Ungulate Winter Range U-3-004 for Wells Gray Caribou Range – recommended construction window of January 16 to November 14. pottery fragments, fossils) discovered during construction. No work at that particular location shall continue until permission is granted by • Ungulate Winter Range U-3-003 for Mule Deer – there is no timing constraint associated with this UWR. the appropriate regulatory authority. Follow the contingency measures identified provided in the Heritage Resources Discovery Contingency • Plan in Appendix B of the Pipeline EPP. Ungulate Winter Range U-2-006 for Mule Deer and Columbian Black-Tailed Deer – there is no timing constraint associated with this UWR. TRADITIONAL LAND USE • Sowaqua Spotted Owl Wildlife Habitat Area – There is no timing constraint associated with this area. However, three spotted owl TLU-Note1: TLU/TLRU Site – Implement the mitigation measures outlined in Section 3.0 of the Resource Specific Mitigation Tables surveys for two consecutive years must be completed prior to Project activity, including one survey within the same year of planned (RSMT)for traditional land use sites. Implement the contingency measures identified in the Traditional Land Use Sites Discovery Contingency activity. Spotted owl surveys are scheduled for 2017 and will be completed prior to Project activity in Fall 2017. If no owls are detected Plan (see Appendix B of the Pipeline EPP) in the event traditional land use sites not previously identified are found during pipeline and during these surveys, Project activity can begin and continue until March 2018. In the event that Project activity is anticipated to extend associated component construction. beyond March 2018, BC MFLNRO will be consulted to determine if additional spotted owl surveys are necessary. Refer to Table 4.2-2B of the RSMT for additional mitigation measures required in this area. WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT • Important Bird Area recommended construction window outside of the migratory bird nesting periods provided below: WF-Note 1: Amphibian Breeding Pond/Stream - Adhere to the General Pipeline Construction Mitigation Measures found in Section 6.0 − Douglas Lake Plateau (BC172) recommended construction window of August 17 to March 27. of the Pipeline EPP. Schedule clearing/construction activities during the recommended construction timing window where feasible (refer to − English Bay and Burrard Inlet (BC020) recommended construction window of August 18 to March 19. Table 4.1-1 and Table 4.1-2 in Section 4.1 of Volume 7 of the RSMT for site-specific timing windows). If clearing/construction is scheduled during the sensitive period an amphibian salvage is required prior to clearing/construction where a conventional crossing method is planned WF-Note 6: Final and Proposed Critical Habitat as identified by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) – Refer to Tables, (note, a salvage and relocation of amphibians outside the area of impact is required for incidentally encountered outside of the sensitive 4.3-1A,B (for Williamson’s Sapsucker), Table 4.3-2 (for Oregon Forestsnail), Table 4.3-3 (for Pacific Watershrew), Table 4.3-4 (for breeding period.). Salvages should be conducted as per the conditions of the salvage permit, generally these should be conducted two Townsend’s mole) and Table 4.3-5A in Section 4.3 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures required within the areas of critical habitat, weeks prior to wetland crossings and 3 days prior to stream crossings. If a trenchless crossing is planned a salvage may not be required. as well as areas of Proposed critical habitat that have been refined for Lewis’s woodpecker. Schedule construction activities during the The Environmental Inspector with the assistance of a Wildlife Resource Specialist, will determine the need for an amphibian salvage prior recommended construction timing window provided below. to a trenchless crossing. The Environmental Inspector with the assistance of a Wildlife Resource Specialist may recommend the installation of exclusion fencing to prevent amphibians from re-entering the pipeline construction footprint. Implement the mitigation measures for Final and Proposed critical habitat has been identified in a posted (final or proposed) federal Recovery Strategy. Where this has been amphibian breeding ponds/streams outlined in Section 4.1 of the RSMT. For the identified breeding ponds of Great Basin spadefoot, mapped, ECCC is working to make the spatial boundaries publicly available. The information on Final and Proposed critical habitat was implement the mitigation measures outlined in the Great Basin Spadefoot Mitigation and Habitat Restoration Plan in Section 6.0 of Volume provided to Trans Mountain for Project planning purposes, and this information has been used by Trans Mountain with the permission of 6 of the Environmental Plans. ECCC. WF-Note 2: Raptor Nest – Adhere to the General Pipeline Construction Mitigation Measures found in Section 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP. • Williamson’s Sapsucker and Lewis’s Woodpecker – recommended construction window of August 19 to April 3. In the event that Schedule clearing and construction activities within the buffer of identified raptor nests during the recommended construction timing windows clearing and construction cannot be scheduled during this period, engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct area searches provided below. In the event clearing/construction activities cannot be scheduled during the recommended timing windows engage a Wildlife within seven days of clearing to identify active nests along the Project Footprint. Refer to Table 4.3-1A (for Williamson’s Sapsucker) Resource Specialist to conduct a site visit to determine the status of the nest. If an active nest is found it will be subject to site-specific and Table 4.3-5A (for Lewis’s woodpecker) for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. In addition, refer to Table 4.3-1B mitigation measures (e.g., clearly marked species-specific buffer around the nest and non-intrusive monitoring). Refer to Table 4.1-1 and (Williamson’s sapsucker) and Table 4.3-5B (Lewis’s woodpecker) for mitigation measures required for identified site-specific habitat Table 4.2-1 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures for raptor nests. features (i.e., suitable nest trees, ant colonies and fruit-bearing shrubs). • Alberta recommended construction timing window: late July to early March.

INDEX SHEET 3 of 9

• Oregon Forestsnail – Schedule Project clearing only after a salvage has been conducted and exclusion fencing installed. Engage a Indian Reserves. A permit is required under Section 73 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA) if those persons conducting activities on federal Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct a salvage during the active period for Oregon forestsnail, these periods are provided below. lands that affect species listed as extirpated, endangered or threatened on Schedule 1 of SARA, contravene SARA’s general or critical Refer to Table 4.3-2 for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. habitat prohibitions. General prohibitions state that no person shall kill, harm, harass, capture or take a wildlife species (Section 32) or − February (depending on weather) to late-June; or damage or destroy the residence of one or more individuals of a wildlife species (Section 33) that is listed as extirpated, endangered or threatened on Schedule 1 of SARA. Destruction of any part of the critical habitat of any endangered, threatened or extirpated species (if a − September to October prior to winter hibernation. recovery strategy has recommended the reintroduction of the species into the wild in Canada) is also prohibited (Section 58). SARA Section 73 Permit Applications for the Project are under review by ECCC. A SARA Permit may not be need on an Indian Reserve if there is no • Pacific Water Shrew – Schedule Project activity only after a Pacific water shrew salvage has been completed by a Wildlife Resource contravention of SARA. For those Indian Reserves that require a SARA Permit, the Conditions of the Permit must be adhered to. Specialist. The salvage must follow the conditions set out in the salvage permit and typically occur for 8 consecutive nights prior to planned clearing activities. A salvage cannot occur if frost, heavy rainfall or cold temperatures (no less than 3°C) are expected to occur. VEGETATION Refer to Table 4.3-3 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. • Townsend’s Mole – Prior to clearing and construction activities engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct an area search for VG-Note 1: Rare Plant and Rare Ecological Communities: Adhere to the General Pipeline Construction Mitigation Measures found in evidence of Townsend’s mole (e.g., mounds). In the event that evidence of Townsend’s mole is present, a Wildlife Resource Specialist Section 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP. Implement the appropriate site-specific mitigation measures related to known rare vascular plants, rare will conduct a salvage as per conditions set out in the salvage permit. Refer to Table 4.3-4 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures lichens, rare liverworts, rare mosses and rare ecological communities of concern as identified in Section 5.1 of the RSMT. Follow the Rare required in this area. Ecological Community and Rare Plant Population Management Plan (see Section 5.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans). • – Great basin spadefoot breeding ponds identified to date are provided in Table 4.3-6 of the RSMT. Schedule Great Basin Spadefoot VG-Note 2: Final, Candidate Regeneration, and Early Draft Critical Habitat as identified by Environment and Climate Change clearing and construction that encounters identified breeding ponds is recommended from July to September. Where clearing and Canada (ECCC): Adhere to the General Pipeline Construction Mitigation Measures found in Section 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP. Within Early construction occur adjacent to an identified breeding pond schedule activities from April to June. If clearing cannot be scheduled during Draft Critical Habitat mitigation is applicable to where the biophysical attributes of critical habitat are present, which may not include the full these periods, contact BC MFLNRO to discuss the site-specific circumstances, practical options and mitigation measures. Refer to extent of Early Draft critical habitat areas. Areas where the biophysical attributes of critical habitat are present are identified in Section 5.1 Table 4.3-6 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. of the RSMT and the Rare Ecological Community and Rare Plant Population Management Plan (see Section 5.0 of Volume 6 of the • Coastal Giant Salamander – Engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct a salvage for three consecutive days prior to clearing Environmental Plans). and construction (as per conditions set out in the salvage permit). Schedule clearing and construction during the fall (i.e., late August to early November) when salamanders can more easily disperse from the area. Refer to Table 4.3-7 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation Final critical habitat has been identified in a posted (final or proposed) federal Recovery Strategy. Where this has been mapped, ECCC is measures required in this area. working to make the spatial boundaries publicly available. The information on Final critical habitat was provided to Trans Mountain for Project planning purposes, and this information has been used by Trans Mountain with the permission of ECCC. WF-Note 7: Early Draft and Candidate Critical Habitat as identified by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) – Refer to Section 4.3 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures required within the areas of critical habitat. Mitigation is applicable to where the Information on Candidate and Early Draft critical habitat (mapped areas) is not publicly available, but was provided to Trans Mountain by biophysical attributes of critical habitat are present, which may not include the full extent of Candidate and Early Draft critical habitat areas. ECCC for Project planning purposes. The information on Candidate and Early Draft critical habitat has been used by Trans Mountain with For more information, including locations where the areas of Early Draft and Candidate critical habitat areas have been refined to date for the permission of ECCC. this Project, refer to Tables, 4.3-8A,B (for Barn owl), Table 4.3-9 (for American badger), Table 4.3-10A,B (for Western screech-owl), Table 4.3-11A,B (for Western rattlesnake and Great Basin gophersnake) and Table 4.3-12 (for Oregon spotted frog), Section 4.3 of the RSMT. VG-Note 3: Rare Plants Located Off Right-of-Way: Rare plant populations located off of the ROW, within 2 m of right-of-way boundary. Adhere to the General Pipeline Construction Mitigation Measures found in Section 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP. Follow the Rare Ecological Information on Candidate and Early Draft critical habitat (mapped areas) is not publicly available, but was provided to Trans Mountain by Community and Rare Plant Population Management Plan (see Section 5.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans). ECCC for Project planning purposes. The information on Candidate and Early Draft critical habitat has been used by Trans Mountain with the permission of ECCC. Schedule construction activities during the recommended construction timing window provided below. VG-Note 4 – Alteration of Old Growth Management Areas (OGMAs): – Obtain necessary permits and approvals from the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (FLNRO) prior to clearing. Narrow the pipeline construction footprint, where practical, to • Barn Owl – Schedule clearing and construction between September and February to avoid the sensitive nesting and fledging period avoid or minimise disturbance within the OGMA. Refer to the Old Growth Management Areas Mitigation and Replacement Plan provided in for barn owls. Where activities cannot be scheduled during this period, engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct area searches Section 5.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans. within seven days of clearing activities to locate active barn owl nests along the Project Footprint. Refer to Table 4.3-8A for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. In addition, refer to Table 4.3-8B of the RSMT for mitigation measures required for identified VG Note 5 – High Density Weeds (Soil Containment Area) – Ensure topsoil is stored on the land parcel from where it was salvaged. site-specific suitable nest trees. Stake or flag topsoil/root zone material windrows containing high density weeds. Refer to Sections 6.0 and 7.0 of the Pipeline EPP and the • American Badger – Prior to clearing and construction activities engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct pre-construction Weed and Vegetation Management Plan (Section 5.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans) for mitigation measures to be implemented sweeps (1-2 weeks prior to clearing) to search for active dens from April 1 to July 15 (maternal and summer dens) and from July 15 to in areas where high density weeds are encountered. the onset of snowfall (winter dens). Refer to Table 4.3-9 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. VG Note 6 – Cryptogamic Crust Salvage Locations – Salvage cryptogamic crust and store appropriately in accordance with the measures • Western Screech-owl (macfalanei and kennicottii ssp.) – Schedule clearing and construction between September and mid-February specified in the Grassland Survey and Mitigation Plan. Re-apply the salvaged cryptogamic crust material after the surface soils have been to avoid the sensitive nesting and fledging period for western screech-owl. Where clearing and construction cannot be scheduled replaced and imprinted and prior to seeding. between September and mid-February engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct area searches prior to clearing in locations of suitable habitat to locate active western screech-owl nests along the Project Footprint. Refer to Table 4.3-10A of the RSMT for detailed WETLANDS mitigation measures required in this area. In addition, refer to Table 4.3-10B of the RSMT for mitigation measures required for identified site-specific suitable nest trees. WT-Note 1: Wetland – Adhere to the wetland crossing mitigation measures found in Section 14.0 of the Pipeline EPP. A list of wetlands • Western Rattlesnake and Great Basin Gophersnake – Schedule clearing and construction between November and mid-March to encountered along the construction footprint and associated mitigation measures is provided in Section 6.0 of Volume 7 of the Environmental avoid the active season for western rattlesnake and Great Basin gophersnake. Where clearing and construction cannot be scheduled Plans. Refer to the Pre-Construction Wetland Survey and Mitigation Plan provided in Section 7.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans. between November and mid-March engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to complete pre-construction sweep of the Project Footprint prior to clearing (as per the conditions set out in the salvage permit) to identify and relocate and snakes found within the Project WT-Note 2: Potentially Navigable Wetland – Adhere to the notification measures provided in Section 5.0 of the Pipeline EPP for navigable Footprint. Refer to Table 4.3-11A of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. In addition, refer to Table 4.3-11B wetlands. Notify recreational boaters of the hazards associated with pipeline construction activities in accordance with NEB requirements or of the RSMT for mitigation measures required for identified site-specific microhabitat features (i.e., talus slopes, rock piles). approval conditions for Navigable Wetlands. Place warning signs (e.g., “Warning – Pipeline Construction Ahead”) on both sides of the • Oregon Spotted Frog – Schedule clearing and construction from mid-August to October during the active period for Oregon spotted navigable wetland crossing. Refer to the Navigation and Navigation Safety Plan provided in Section 8.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental frogs to facilitate successful salvage of individuals. Engage a Wildlife Resource Specialist to conduct a salvage prior to clearing and Plans. construction activities, salvages will be conducted for the duration set out in the salvage permit, generally salvages occur two weeks prior to initiating clearing activities. Refer to Table 4.3-12 of the RSMT for detailed mitigation measures required in this area. WT-Note 3: Wet Area – Adhere to the general construction mitigation measures for potentially wet low-lying areas. These areas include ecosystems that possess wetland vegetation characteristics, low areas, and deep water due to anthropogenic disturbances (i.e., artificial WF-Note 8: Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat on Federal Lands – Refer to Section 4.5 of the RSMT for more information. Contractors and ponds, borrow pits), but do not meet the vegetation, hydrological and/or soil requirements to be classified as a wetland. Environmental Inspectors need to be aware if a Species at Risk Act (SARA) Permit has been obtained where the Project interacts with INDEX SHEET 4 of 9

WT-Note 4: Wetland Complex – Implement the relevant Wetland Crossing Mitigation Measures found in Section 14.0 of the Pipeline EPP SO-Note 2: Compaction and Rutting – Work during dry and/or frozen soil conditions, where feasible, to ensure that there is sufficient frost while crossing complex wetlands (consisting of multiple wetland types and classes). A list of wetland complexes encountered along the or low soil moisture to allow construction to take place without causing rutting or compaction (as determined by an Environmental Inspector construction footprint and associated mitigation measures is provided in Section 6.0 of the RSMT. Refer to the Pre-Construction Wetland in discussion with the Construction Manager or designate). Implement measures outlined in Sections 7.0 and 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP, and Survey and Mitigation Plan provided in Section 7.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans. in the Wet/Thawed Soils Contingency Plan (Appendix B of the Pipeline EPP) to minimise compaction and rutting of susceptible soils.

WATERCOURSES SO-Note 3: Unstable Trench – If trench instability is anticipated, salvage topsoil/root zone material from a wider area to accommodate a wider trench and the spoil generated from that trench. Store salvaged topsoil/root zone material at a sufficient distance from the trench so AQ-Note 1: Fish-Bearing – Implement the appropriate measures for fish-bearing watercourses outlined in Section 14 of the Pipeline EPP that topsoil/ root zone material does not slough into the trench if the walls collapse, and so that trench spoil does not slough back into the and Section 7.0 of the RSMT. Undertake instream activities for pipeline and vehicle/equipment crossings during the construction timing trench and has to be re-excavated. Additional spoil storage space will be needed to accommodate the additional spoil material generated window indicated, where feasible, unless otherwise specified in Section 7.0 of the RSMT. Salvage of fishes is required at all fish-bearing by the widened trench and the spoil that has sloughed back into the trench. watercourses, where an isolated crossing method is used. Water quality monitoring will be required unless otherwise specified. All instream works to be conducted in isolation of flowing water. SO-Note 4: Unsurveyed Lands – Adhere to the general pipeline construction mitigation measures outlined in Sections 7.0 and 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP. Develop mitigation measures in co-operation with an Environmental Inspector, the Environmental Compliance Manager, and AQ-Note 2: Non Fish-Bearing – Implement the appropriate measures for nonfish-bearing watercourses outlined in Section 14 of the the Environmental Manager if the measures identified in the Pipeline EPP prove to be ineffective, or should soils have characteristics that Pipeline EPP and Section 7.0 of the RSMT. Water quality monitoring is not required, however, the Environmental Inspector, in consultation are prone to erosion (by wind or water), sloughing, pulverisation, compaction, and/or rutting. with the Aquatic Resource Specialist (QAES/QEP) may require water quality monitoring to be undertaken if fish habitat occurs within the immediate downstream zone of influence. SO-Note 5: Existing Foreign Topsoil Berms – Remove the topsoil berm prior to construction. Adhere to the general topsoil salvage and topsoil handling measures outlined in Sections 7.0 and 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP. Salvage the topsoil underneath the berm. Stripping depths AQ-Note 3: Navigable Waters – Adhere to the notification measures provided in Section 5.0 of the Pipeline EPP for Navigable and soil handling measures should be assigned in co-operation with the Environmental Inspector, the Environmental Compliance Manager, Watercourses. Notify recreational boaters of the hazards associated with instream construction in accordance with NEB requirements or and the Environmental Manager. approval conditions for navigable waters protection. Place warning signs (e.g., “Warning – Pipeline Construction Ahead”) upstream and downstream from all crossings of watercourses deemed navigable. Refer to the Navigation and Navigation Safety Plan provided in SO-Note 6: Soil Erosion by Water – Implement erosion control measures outlined in Sections 7.0 and 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP to prevent Section 8.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans. soil erosion by water. In the event erosion occurs, implement the Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Contingency Plan (Appendix B of the Pipeline EPP). AQ-Note 4: Potentially Navigable Waters – Recreational use of potentially navigable waters is unlikely, but remains possible with small watercraft, such as canoes/kayaks. Formal public notification and placement of signage is not required. However, construction during open SO-Note 7: Poor Quality Lower Subsoils – Refer to Section 8.1 of the RSMT for areas recommended for three-lift soils handling. Ensure water conditions should remain vigilant for the potential presence of recreational users. Assistance with the safe portage of small watercraft that the poorer-quality lower lift of subsoil is backfilled and compacted before the better-quality upper lift of subsoil is replaced where three-lift across the work site may be required. soils handling has been conducted. Refer to Dwg. 13 [Topsoil Salvage – Three-Lift Soils Handling on Cultivated Land (Non-Frozen)] provided in Appendix C of the Pipeline EPP. AQ-Note 5: Fish-Bearing Species at Risk Act (SARA) Watercourses & Critical Habitat – Implement the appropriate measures for fish-bearing watercourses identified as containing Species at Risk Act listed species and Critical Habitat outlined in Section 14 of the Pipeline SO-Note 8 Moderate and High Risk Contamination – Ensure a Contamination Resource Specialist is present to check for indications of EPP and Section 7.0 of the RSMT. Undertake instream activities for pipeline and vehicle/equipment crossings at fish-bearing watercourse potential contamination (i.e., groundwater sheen and adjacent soil staining) during trench excavation in areas where there is higher potential crossings during the construction timing window indicated (i.e., the window of least-risk for proposed crossings in BC and outside the for encountering contamination (e.g., known areas of existing contamination) as identified in the Contamination Identification and Restricted Activity Periods (RAPs) for proposed crossings in Alberta), unless otherwise specified in Section 7.0 of the RSMT. Salvage of Assessment Plan (Section 3.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans). Implement the Contamination Discovery Contingency Plan (see fishes is required at all fish-bearing watercourses, where an isolated crossing method is used, and must also follow safe handling measures Appendix B of the Pipeline EPP) in the event that an unidentified contaminated soils or groundwater are discovered during construction. prescribed by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Water quality monitoring will also be required. Site-specific mitigation and/or reclamation Adhere to applicable measures provided in the Waste Management Plan (see Section 3.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans) for measures may be required. Refer to the Nooksack Dace and Salish Sucker Management Plan provided in Section 8.0 of Volume 6 of the handling and disposal of contaminated material. Environmental Plans in the event that a trenchless crossing is not feasible. GEOLOGY HYDROLOGY GEO-Note 1: Potentially Acid Generating (PAG) Rock: Inspection of bedrock must be conducted by a qualified person or qualified HY-Note 1: Underground Water – Adhere to the applicable hydrogeology mitigation measures found in Section 6.0 and Section 7.0 of the person-trainee for the presence of sulfides or characteristics suggesting material may be permissive of Metal Leaching/Acid Rock Drainage Pipeline EPP for shallow groundwater and unconfined aquifers. Flag all field identified wells within 150 m of the pipeline construction footprint (ML/ARD) conditions. Excavated PAG or sulfide-bearing rock should be maximized as trench backfill and, if volumes exceed backfill as well as groundwater locations prior to construction to avoid any damage. Where groundwater contamination is suspected, implement the capacities, material will be stored above ground at sites adhering to characteristics described in the ML/ARD Management Plan. For areas Contaminated Sites Discovery Contingency Plan (Appendix B of the Pipeline EPP). For site-specific mitigation, refer to the Groundwater with exposed PAG surfaces (e.g., rock cuts), refer to the ML/ARD Management Plan for possible mitigation strategies to manage acidic Management Plan provided in Section 4.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans. and/or metal-rich runoff. Monitoring protocols should be initiated for areas with acidic/metal-rich drainage, at frequencies/testing discussed in the ML/ARD Management Plan (Section 4.0 of Volume 6 of the Environmental Plans). Appropriate field personnel (i.e., Environmental SOILS Inspector) will be notified of sampled locations, above ground storage sites and areas with observed/monitored drainage/runoff

SO-Note 1: Soil Erosion by Wind – Suspend topsoil handling operations if drifting or topsoil loss is evident due to erosion by wind. GEO-Note 2: Shallow Bedrock – Where ripping or typical trenching methods are not feasible, drill and blast competent bedrock Implement the erosion control measures outlined in Sections 7.0 and 10.0 of the Pipeline EPP to prevent soil erosion by wind. In the event encountered within trench depth. Refer to Sections 10.0, 11.0 and 12.0 of the Pipeline EPP for mitigation measures to be implemented while that soil erosion by wind occurs, implement the Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Contingency Plan (Appendix B of the Pipeline EPP). working in areas of bedrock. Refer to Section 6.0 of the Pipeline EPP for measures related to disposal of bedrock and importation of bedding and padding materials.

INDEX SHEET 5 of 9

LEGEND

LAND USES HIGH DENSITY WEED SPECIES See the Land Use band See the Terrestrial Features Land Use1 EAS Label Species (EAS Label if Applicable) Description AC reed canarygrass Cleared land that has had the trees removed but was never ploughed BD butterfly bush Cultivated land used for the purposes of growing crops (excluding hay crops) BU burdock species Disturbed Land (DL) industrial or residential land or soils that have been disturbed due to prior construction activity CL cutleaf blackberry Drainage Channel (DC) areas generally without defined bed and banks with poorly-drained gleysolic soils CT Canada thistle Hay land used primarily for hay production DK diffuse knapweed Native Grassland land that supports native grass vegetation DT Dalmatian toadflax Open Water (O) Areas of depression with standing water HA hoary alyssum Recreational land designated for recreational use (e.g., ball park and golf course) HI Himalayan blackberry River major watercourses HO English holly Tame Pasture (TAME-PAST) cleared land that is not being actively cultivated and does not support native grass vegetation and is predominantly used for grazing HS hawkweed species Tree Farm land used primarily for commercial tree production HT common hound's-tongue Treed (T) areas that are treed (a description of tree species present is available in the site inspection list of the soils technical reports) HU narrow-leaved hawkweed Treed Pasture (T-PAST) areas that are a mixture of trees and pasture IM policeman's helmet JK Japanese knotweed KH king-devil hawkweed AGRICULTURAL LAND USES KS knapweed species See the Socio-Economic Considerations band MB tall buttercup Agriculture Type General Description MH meadow hawkweed Unique Agricultural Organic Farm Lands organic fruit and vegetable production lands or organic poultry/livestock MK meadow knapweed Operations Container Nursery Farm container nursery with recognizable irrigation systems and nursery beds MN small touch-me-not Turf Farm intensive commercial sod production OD oxeye daisy Cranberry Farm cranberry fields and fields with more than one berry crop OG orchard-grass Mixed Berry Field mixed berry fields with more than one berry crop in the footprint OH orange hawkweed Livestock Operations Livestock (Beef) beef/feed lot within the construction footprint H poison hemlock Livestock (Equestrian) barns, paddocks and riding ring PS perennial sow-thistle Livestock (Dairy) dairy barns within the construction footprint QH queen-devil hawkweed Livestock (Farm Yard) farm land with recognizable livestock barns and/or corrals SC sulphur cinquefoil Livestock (Poultry) poultry facility within the construction footprint SH scentless chamomile Specialty Field Crops Vineyard grape fields SK spotted knapweed Field Nursery field production tree nursery with recognizable irrigation systems TC common tansy Raspberry Cultivation raspberry fields TR tansy ragwort Blueberry Cultivation blueberry fields WP whiplash hawkweed YG yellow archangel YH queen-devil hawkweed YT yellow/common toadflax

INDEX SHEET 6 of 9

WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT RARE PLANT AND RARE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES See the Terrestrial Features See the Terrestrial Features EAS Label (Top) Associated Feature Name Feature Code Common Names Columbia spotted frog Amphibian Breeding Pond Rare Plants and Lichens ANEMCAN Canada anemone long-toed salamander BOTRALA Alaska moonwort Great Basin spadefoot BOTRASC upswept moonwort northern Pacific tree frog BOTRCRE dainty moonwort northern red-legged frog BOTRECH echo moonwort northwestern salamander BOTRMIC Michigan moonwort BOTRMON mountain moonwort roughskin newt CARECAN silvery sedge unidentified tadpoles CARDPRA toothed bittercress western toad CONOSAL snakeskin liverwort western toad and Columbia spotted frog COPTTRI three-leaved goldthread EPILHOR Hornemann's willowherb wood frog GYMNDIS crested wood fern coastal tailed frog Amphibian Breeding Stream HYDRTEN Pacific waterleaf northwestern salamander NAJAFLE slender naiad Bald Eagle Nest Raptor Nest ONCOVIR green spur-fruited fork moss Barred Owl Nest PELISP Pellia species PHYSCHL Physciella lichen Osprey Nest PYROELL white wintergreen Peregrine Falcon Nest RACOAFF Racomitrium moss Red-tailed Hawk Nest SARMSAR Sarmenthypnum moss Oregon Forestsnail Final Critical Habitat Final Critical Habitat: Rare Ecological Communities Pacific Water Shrew Final Critical Habitat ABIEAMA amabilis fir - western redcedar/devil's club Moist Submaritime ARTETRI big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass Townsend’s Mole Final Critical Habitat BETUNAN scrub birch/water sedge Williamson’s Sapsucker Final Critical Habitat CAREROS beaked sedge marsh Lewis’s Woodpecker Proposed Critical Habitat Proposed Critical Habitat: DRYOCRI crested wood fern Coastal Giant Salamander Proposed Critical Habitat EQUIFLU swamp horsetail - beaked sedge marsh Great Basin Spadefoot Proposed Critical Habitat FESTCAM rough fescue - bluebunch wheatgrass JUNCBAL Baltic rush - common silverweed Barn Owl Candidate Critical Habitat Candidate Critical Habitat LEYMCIN giant wildrye Herbaceous Vegetation American Badger Early Draft Critical Habitat Early Draft Critical Habitat PICEMAR black spruce/skunk cabbage/peat-mosses Great Basin Gophersnake Early Draft Critical Habitat PINUCON lodgepole pine / peat-mosses Very Dry Maritime Oregon Spotted Frog Early Draft Critical Habitat lodgepole pine/velvet-leaved blueberry/clad lichens ponderosa pine/bluebunch wheatgrass Western Rattlesnake Early Draft Critical Habitat ponderosa pine/bluebunch wheatgrass - rough fescue Western Screech-owl Early Draft Critical Habitat POPUTRE trembling aspen/common snowberry/Kentucky bluegrass North Saskatchewan River Key Wildlife and Biodiversity Zone Wildlife Area trembling aspen/common snowberry/ mountain sweet-cicely Athabasca River Key Wildlife and Biodiversity Zone POPUTRI black cottonwood–red alder / salmonberry Trumpeter Swan Waterbody PSEUMEN Douglas-fir/common snowberry - saskatoon PSEUSPI bluebunch wheatgrass – junegrass Special Access Zone SALIBEB beaked willow/red-osier dogwood shrubland Grizzly Bear Zone Bebb's willow/bluejoint reedgrass Wells Gray Caribou Herd Range SALIEXI narrow-leaf willow Shrubland Groundhog Caribou Range SALISIT Sitka willow/Sitka sedge Ungulate Winter Range SALISPP willow species/ostrich fern SCHOACU hard-stemmed bulrush Deep Marsh Sowaqua Spotted Owl Wildlife Habitat Area TYPHLAT common cattail Marsh Important Bird Area THUJPLI western redcedar - Douglas-fir/false Solomon's seal Notes: 1 Final: federal Recovery Strategy and critical habitat have gone through all phases of review and the process is complete. This information is publicly available in a posted western redcedar - Douglas-fir/vine maple Recovery Strategy. western redcedar - paper birch/oak fern western redcedar – Sitka spruce/skunk cabbage 2 Proposed: federal Recovery Strategy has completed all stages of regional review and pre-registry consultation. The recovery strategy’s next step is to be posted on the Western redcedar/slough sedge Species at Risk Public Registry for a 60-day consultation as a 'proposed' recovery strategy. This information is publicly available in a posted Recovery Strategy. western redcedar/sword fern Dry Maritime 3 Candidate: federal Recovery Strategy has completed an internal review and has been partially vetted by BC and (if relevant) other agencies (i.e., Fisheries and Oceans western redcedar/sword fern-skunk cabbage Canada or Parks Canada). This information is not publicly available and is provided with the permission of ECCC. Candidate Regeneration, Early Draft, and Final Critical Habitat1 AZOLMEX Mexican mosquito fern early draft critical habitat 4 Early Draft: federal Recovery Strategy has not completed an internal federal review. This information is not publicly available and is provided with the permission of ECCC. BROTROE Roell’s brotherella moss early draft critical habitat ROTARAM Toothcup final critical habitat PINUALB whitebark pine candidate regeneration critical habitat Notes: 1 Refer to the notes of the Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat table for definitions of critical habitat

INDEX SHEET 7 of 9

WETLANDS DESCRIPTIONS See the Hydrology (Wetlands and Watercourses) band Dominant Wetland Class General Wetland Class Characteristics Wetland Type Description of Wetland Type Bog Wetlands that have a water table at or near the surface. Stagnant water Treed bog Black spruce dominate the upper story with sphagnum mosses. without water flow. Depend on precipitation for water inputs. Fen Peat accumulating wetlands that tend to have their surfaces level with the Non-treed fen Herbaceous-dominated vegetation communities with brown mosses present. water table and typically have water flow on the surface as well as Shrubby fen Upper story of the vegetation community dominated by shrubs, such as Labrador tea, willows and birches. subsurface. Treed fen Tamarack dominate the upper story with brown mosses. Swamp Mineral wetlands with up to 20 cm peat veneer. The water table is typically at Broad leafed tree swamp Deciduous tree species (e.g., paper birch, aspen) dominate the upper story of the vegetation community. or just below the ground surface. Mixedwood treed swamp Deciduous and coniferous tree species (e.g., paper birch, aspen, and spruce) dominate the upper story of the vegetation community. Needle-leaf treed swamp Coniferous tree species (e.g., black and white spruce) dominate the upper story of the vegetation community. Shrubby swamp Shrub species (e.g., willows) dominate the upper story of the vegetation community. Marsh Mineral wetlands with shallow water levels that can fluctuate quickly. Wet Meadow Marshes with temporary water levels (often dry by late spring). Permanency of water also varies. Seasonal marsh or seasonal emergent marsh Marshes with seasonal water levels (often dry by late summer). Emergent marsh Marshes with semi-permanent water levels (often present into the fall). Shallow Open Water Permanent in nature and can be associated with other wetland types. Shallow Artificial Pond (non-wetland) Construction ponds, such as dugouts and stormwater retention facilities. open water wetlands typically are less than 2 m deep. Flood Association (non-wetland) Ecosystems that possess wetland characteristics but do not meet the strict definition of a wetland. Sites typically do not meet the vegetation, hydrological and/or soil requirements to be considered wetlands. Open water pond Ponds with permanent water levels. Wetland Complex Features that are hydrologically connected (e.g., through drainage features) Wetland Complex Wetlands within complexes are typically connected by ground or surface waters, which increases the length of the water flow path. Long flow paths allow for longer retention times for sediment, nutrients and or exhibit more than one wetland type (e.g., swamp and marsh). other contaminants to settle out from the water column, be attenuated by vegetation or be incorporated into any biogeochemical processes.

FISH AND FISH HABITAT HYDROLOGY See the Hydrology (Wetlands and Watercourses) band See the Other Environmental Considerations band Class Description Riparian Buffer Area Hydrological Feature Description Alberta Class B watercourses classes designated by provincial fisheries biologists and 30 m Shallow Groundwater Locations with increased potential to experience groundwater discharge into open excavations by intersecting the water table or Class C defined in the Codes of Practice 30 m (fish-bearing) Shallow groundwater; artesian comprising the integrity of a shallow confining unit 10 m (nonfish-bearing) conditions British Columbia S1A (fish-bearing large rivers) mean channel width > 100 m 50 m S1B (fish-bearing) mean channel width > 20-100 m 50 m S2 (fish-bearing) mean channel width > 5-20 m 30 m CONTAMINATION RISK S3 (fish-bearing) mean channel width 1.5-5 m 20 m See the Other Environmental Considerations band S4 (fish-bearing) mean channel width < 1.5 m 15 m Contamination Risk Description S5 (nonfish-bearing) mean channel width > 3 m 10 m Moderate Risk Contamination Identified as having a potential impact to the Project Footprint. S6 (nonfish-bearing) mean channel width ≤ 3 m 10 m High Risk Contamination Identified as a property with current and/or historical activities that have known contamination, or will likely have contamination, within the Project Footprint. Sampled Areas of high risk contamination that have been sampled and confirmed within the Project Footprint

INDEX SHEET 8 of 9

TOPOGRAPHY CLASSES SOIL PHASES Included in the soils symbols on the Photomosaics Included in the soils symbols on the Photomosaics Symbol % Slope Description Soil Phase EAS Label Description 1 0-0.5 Level Bouldery by bouldery at the surface 2 >0.5-2 Nearly Level Disturbed di previously disturbed by construction activities 3 >2-5 Very Gentle Slopes Gleyed gl imperfectly drained and exhibit mottling and gleying features in the subsoil 4 >5-10 Gentle Slopes Overlying gravel /gv gravelly at depth 5 >10-15 Moderate Slopes Peaty pt Gleysolic soils that have 20-50 cm of the surface peat 6 >15-30 Strong Slopes Saline sa moderately saline and strongly sodic subsoils 7 >30-45 Very Strong Slopes Saline lower subsoil sc saline lower subsoils 8 >45-70 Extreme Slopes Shallow sh non-conforming parent material within 1.0 m of the surface 9 >70-100 Steep Slopes Stony st stonier than normal 10 > 100 Very Steep Slopes

SOIL PARENT MATERIAL See the Soil Parent Material band Parent Material EAS abbreviation (if Applicable) Description Colluvium C Colluvial deposits occur mostly on or at the base of steep slopes and consist of materials originating from nearby sources that have been re-deposited by the force of gravity. The deposits are usually loose, moderately to rapidly permeable and variable in depth to hard bedrock. Usual textures are gravelly sandy loam with a high proportion of stones and cobbles. They tend to be unstable and in some areas may still actively be accumulating. Topography is usually moderately to extremely sloping. Colluvial fan Cf Colluvial fan deposits occur in areas below steeply sloping valley walls where the material has spread out onto valley bottoms. The material is generally very coarse textured and reflects the lithology of the local bedrock or surficial materials from the adjacent uplands. The material is non-saline, non-sodic and usually non-calcareous. Eolian E Eolian deposits consist of material deposited by wind. The material is usually stone-free and silt loam to sand textured. Eolian deposits are sometimes underlain by morainal or other surficial deposits. Fluvial F Most fluvial deposits occur on level to gently undulating floodplains but also occur adjacent to some of the smaller creeks and rivers. Textures range from sandy to silty in the surface and usually grade to sand at depths of 0.5 m to 2 m. Most areas are affected by high groundwater tables and many areas are poorly drained. Periodic flooding during the winter months in the Fraser Valley is common on these deposits. Fluvial fan Ff Fluvial fan deposits usually occur where relatively swiftly flowing streams abruptly lose velocity and deposit the heavier part of their sediment load in a fan shaped pattern. Many are still in the process of formation. The deposits are usually moderately to excessively stony and are variable in texture, with coarse to moderately coarse textured being the most common. Topography varies from gently to steeply sloping in the direction of stream flow. Glaciofluvial GF Glaciofluvial deposits consist of material deposited by streams flowing within (eskers) and from the ice sheet. Glaciofluvial deposits vary from gravelly to loamy sand to sand textured. Glaciofluvial deposits occur on undulating to gently rolling upland terraces but occasionally may also occur on steeply sloping terrain. Glaciofluvial sands and gravels are non-saline, non-sodic and non-calcareous. Glaciolacustrine GL Glaciolacustrine deposits consist of material deposited from glacial meltwater into lakes. Glaciolacustrine clays and silts occur mainly on gently undulating to gently rolling landscapes. The glaciolacustrine clays and silts are non-saline and non-sodic. Glaciomarine GM Glaciomarine sediments consist of massive, compact, very slowly permeable silty to clayey sediments, which have not been preloaded by glacial ice as is the case with morainal deposits. The glaciomarine deposits, which were laid down in near-shore locations during glacial recession and subsequently exposed through isostatic rebound, contain variable amounts (usually minor) of stones, cobbles and gravel incorporated from floating ice. Topography varies from gently undulating to strongly sloping on the eolian veneer deposits that overlie morainal or glaciomarine materials. Hard consolidated R Assemblage of hard minerals bound together or sometimes a mass of a single mineral. rock Competent bedrock Lacustrine L Stone-free lake deposits range in texture from silt loam to silty clay and occur on relatively level topography. Lacustrine deposits consist of sediments deposited in lake environments during post-glacial time. Most areas of lacustrine deposits have shallow groundwater tables in the Fraser Valley. Organic O Organic deposits form when the rate of organic accumulation exceeds the rate of decomposition. The peat is derived from accumulations of reeds, sedges, grasses and moss, in various stages of decomposition. In some areas, a proportion of mineral material is mixed with the organic material, which was usually carried in and deposited during flooding by adjacent watercourses. Pitted Deltaic PD Pitted deltaic deposits consist of water-worked morainal material that is comprised mainly of bedded fine sand and silt. These deposits occur in the Stony Plain and Carvel area, west of Edmonton. Pitted deltaic deposits vary in texture from fine sandy loam to silty clay loam and occur on gently undulating to strongly rolling landscapes. The deposits are non-saline and non-sodic but occasionally may be weakly calcareous to the surface. (The pits were created by the ablating blocks of ice in the delta that formed and created Glacial Lake Edmonton.) Glacial Till GT Glacial till (morainal) deposits are heterogeneous material deposited directly by glacial ice. Glacial till is usually slightly to very stony but can be exceedingly stony. Some of the glacial till deposits may be gravelly in texture and sometimes hard consolidated bedrock occurs within a metre of the surface. The glacial till is non-saline and non-sodic but can be moderately calcareous within 50 cm of the surface. Glacial till deposits occur on undulating to extremely sloping terrain. Weathered bedrock B Weathered bedrock is soft and can be excavated using standard excavation equipment. TBD -- Soil parent material not discernible or not present. Soil surveys may not have been completed on these lands.

INDEX SHEET 9 of 9

117°0'0"W 116°0'0"W 115°0'0"W 114°0'0"W N " 0 ' 0 3

° Iosegun 4 5 Lake OP33 Crooked ENVIRONMENTAL ALIGNMENT Lake F O X C R EEK SHEETS OVERVIEW - 32 EDMONTON TO HINTON ¯ OP OP2 SPREADS 1 AND 2 Smoke Lake Carson-Pegasus Provincial TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT Park er ! iv . Kilometre Post (KP) R a sc r ba ") Terminal / Tank Farm t ive a W E S T LOCK Li tle Smoky R 43 th 18 OP A Thunder Lake OP W H I T E COURT .! Pump Station Provincial Park B A R R HEAD Redwa te *# Construction Spread Break r R k iv e er N e " Trans Mountain Expansion Project 0 r '

44 0

C OP ° 4 5

n r R E D W ATER e N r Village / Hamlet " v a i e v e 0 R r ' and i 18 iv L E G AL 0 B rl m OP ° e R

d R 4 l na 5 O bi

d M A Y E R T HORPE em !(1 Highway o P er e iv L R c Railway ca 43 BON s M OP G I B B ONS a b ACCORD a Shiningbank Environmental Alignment Sheet h M O R I N VILLE t Lake A OP33 OP28 City / Town / District Municipality OP32 2 OP OP15 Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement Sundance O N O WAY OP37 ST. Provincial National Park Park ALBERT Lobsti ck Ri ver Chip Spread 2b Provincial Park 140 Lake GAINFORD 100 80 60 SPRUCE EDSON 90 PUMP 43 50 1 Park / Protected Area / KP 175! OP GROVE Spread 1 William A. Obed Lake PUMP 170 KP 200 . .! STATION Conservancy Area Provincial Park .! .! .! *# .! .! KP 100 KP 75 40 ").! Switzer STATION .! .! *# EDMONTON N "

190 0 Provincial *#.! 16 WOLF 110 KP 150 30 TERMINAL ' 200 KP 225 OP 130 120 KP 125 .! 0 .! # KP 0 3 Provincial Boundary Park 160 PUMP Wabamun 70 * ° 3

.! E D S ON STATION 5 N " 150 Lake S T O NY KP 50 EDMONTON 0 KP 250 ' 180 Spread 2c 0 210 P L A IN Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N.

3 Spread 2a ° .! KP 275 Facilities: provided by KMC 2012; Proposed KPs and Centreline 3 220 5 20 .! 10 SSEID005.1: provided by UPI, Apr. 20, 2017; Transportation: USNIMA KP 300 2000, BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan 2015; Geopolitical Boundaries: d Fickle x KP 25 NRCan 2003, AltaLIS 2016, IHS Inc. 2010 & ESRI 2005; First Nation m . Lake r 60 2 H I N TON 22 ve OP Lands: AltaLIS 2010, Government of Canada 2016 & IHS Inc. 2015; _ OP i B E A U MONT

1 D E V ON Hydrology: IHS Inc. 2004; Parks and Protected Areas: ATPR 2012,

d R

a NRCan 2016 & AltaLIS 2012; Edmonton TUC: Alberta Infrastructure

e n r 230 2015; Canadian Hillshade: TERA Environmental Consultants 2008; US p a

S 19 _ ew OP Hillshade: ESRI 2009. 4 .! ch 0 t v ska

e This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by r North Sa R 47 e the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary _ 240 OP v 8 KP 325 to KMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written 8 i C A L MAR 9 consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying 0 R 0 243 purposes, nor for doing any work on or around KMC's pipelines and facilities, _ rras Eagle Point S HINTON ba all of which require KMC's prior written approval. A *#.! LEDUC E D R A Y TON Provincial

_ PUMP STATION m

M E V A L LEY Park 2 H

C M

_ Spread 2 end

P 39

A OP c M

_ L

1 40 0 OP eod 7 Riv 1 e 0 r r M I L LET Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated 2 e \ v with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of

d i

a R these data are advised that errors in the data may be present.

e Coal

r a

p n

S i Lake y b B N \ m " 0 w

e ' e 0 i P °

v Pigeon B R IT ISH r

3 AL B E RTA

e WETASKIWIN 5 v Lake C O LU MBIA N O " z \

0 k ' 4 0 0 e °

v Brazeau Dawson

3 e e r Grande (!2

5 Creek R C 13 Prairie \ Reservoir OP

8 e t 97 43 8 (! (! s 9

e 0 Brazeau

0 d

_ o B Prince S Lake Edmonton

A 2 2A George

a E M OP OP 16 _ (! t Hinton

M t Edson 2 C nal Riv l

H a ! rdi er e Quesnel Red C 40 Jasper Deer _ OP Valemount R P A JASPER i Blue River JasM per 22 v (!2 _ OP e Williams 1 20 r Lake 0 NATIONAL PARK (!97 Calgary 7 OP 1 1 Darfield (! 0 2

\ Kamloops S A E \

S r P O N OKA Kelowna E e L I v F 3 Maligne i (! _ 53 Vancouver P

R OP (Burnaby) Hope A Lake R I M BEY M US A u \ P a E e M 53 M ver i z MAP NUMBER PAGE T S OP - o R e a S u k I t s d 201701_MAP_CH2M_EAS_00988_REV04_SPREAD1_2 h e r SHEET 1 OF 6

G i \ c B R i DATE CH2M REF. REVISION

N n

C e October 2017 664818 04

\ 93 N s OP "

e R 0 SCALE DISCIPLINE r Gull ' PAGE SIZE a i 0 h v LACOMBE 3 ° S Lake 1:900,000 11x17 EAS \

e 2 n Crimson Lake r 5 DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN N o "

0 A m B E N T LEY ' Provincial Park AJ CMR TGG 0 m t 12 3 o h

° OP c \ 2 a

l km l

5 12 i b OP h 0 10 20 30 40 a m R O C KY 2 117°0'0"W 116°0'0"W 115°0'0"W 114°0'0"W s B L A C K FALDS h c

c ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE

\ M O U N TAIN a \ H O U SE R iv e r !

120°0'0"W ! Dunster

16 Mount Robson Lanezi OP Provincial Park Lake Spread 3a Mount Robson ¯ 1 ! Ghost 10 H*#ARGREAVES Lake .! TRAP SITE JASPER REARGUARD NATIONAL ! .! .! PUMP PARK Tête Jaune Cache *# STATION Mitchell KP 500 Lake Spread 3b Cariboo Mountains Moose Lake Provincial Park

20 V A L E M OUNT OP16

! .! F KP 525 *# r Cedarside a s Spread 3c e r R ! i 30 v er

! !

N ! Albreda o r th T 40 h .! o m p KP 550 so Hobson n Lake R ive r 50

r e v i Azure y R 60 sefl Lake Hor Angus .! ! Horne Lake KP 575

!

70 5 Crooked OP Lake Clearwater Lake Mcdougall Lake

Kostal 80 .! Lake KP 600

BLUE RIVER Wells Gray PUMP Mud Lake Provincial Murtle STATION Kinbasket *#.!! Park Lake Blue River Lake 90 Spread 4a 23 N

" OP

0 C ' 0

°

C o 2 5 l

l

e u a

m

r N w "

b 0 .! '

i 0

KP 625 ° a a 2

t 5

R e 100

r i v

R e Mahood iv r e Lake r ! Canim Lake ! Tumtum Mahood Falls Lake 110

! ! ! .! ! KP 650 Avola 120

C L E A R WATER KP 675 Taweel 140 .! .! Provincial 160 MCMURPHY Upper Seymour ! 130 PUMP STATION River Provincial Park Park .! KP 725 OP5 Blackpool ! ! KP 700 *# Spread 4b Birch .! ! .! 170 Island 150 Vavenby ! d x 180 m . 4 _ 3

d ! 24

a OP 23 e

r OP p

S Bridge _ 4

0 Lake v e

R KP 750 _

8 .!

8 ! 9 0 0

_ Little Fort S A E _ M

2 190 H C _ P A M _

1 196

0 DARFIELD 7 1

0 Spread 4 end *#.! TRAP 2

\ Bonaparte !

d SITE a

e Lake r Darfield p S

y !Simpcw B

\ Adams w e

i Lake v

r ! e v !Seymour Arm O

z Chinook Cove \ 4 0

v 120°0'0"W e R

\ ! 8 8 9 0 0

_ .! S BRITISH Kilometre Post (KP) Village / Hamlet Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement A !

E ALBERTA

_ COLUMBIA M 2

H Dawson ") Terminal 1 Highway National Park C Grande 2 !( _ Creek (!

P Prairie A (!97 M (!43 _ ! 1 . Pump Station Railway Provincial Park ENVIRONMENTAL 0 7 Edmonton ! 1 ALIGNMENT SHEETS OVERVIEW -

0 Prince

2 George 16 \ (! Hinton S Edson HARGREAVES TO DARFIELD

A *# Construction Spread Break Environmental Alignment Sheet Park / Protected Area / Conservancy Area E

\ Quesnel S Red SPREADS 3 AND 4

E Valemount Jasper

L Deer I F

_ Blue River 2 Trans Mountain Expansion Project City / Town / District Municipality Provincial Boundary P Williams (! ! A Lake TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT M (!97 Calgary \ 1 P Darfield (! E

M Kamloops ! T ! MAP NUMBER PAGE -

S ! I 201701_MAP_CH2M_EAS_00988_REV04_SPREAD3_4 G Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N. SHEET 2 OF 6

\ Kelowna R Facilities: provided by KMC 2012; Proposed KPs and Centreline SSEID005.1: provided by UPI, Apr. 20, 2017; Transportation: IHS Inc. 2016, BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan 2015; Geopolitical DATE CH2M REF. REVISION N (!3 C Vancouver \ Boundaries: NRCan 2003, AltaLIS 2016, BC MFLNRO 2007, IHS Inc. 2010 & ESRI 2005; First Nation Lands: AltaLIS 2010, Government of Canada 2016 & IHS Inc. 2015; Hydrology: IHS Inc. 2004; October 2017 664818 04 s (Burnaby) Hope e r Parks and Protected Areas: ATPR 2012, BC MFLNRO 2008, NRCan 2016 & AltaLIS 2012; Canadian Hillshade: TERA Environmental Consultants 2008; US Hillshade: ESRI 2009. SCALE PAGE SIZE DISCIPLINE a

h US A S ! 1:650,000 11x17 EAS \

n ! o This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary to KMC and is not to be provided to any other DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN m recipient without the written consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying purposes, nor for doing any work on or around KMC's pipelines and facilities, all of which require KMC's AJ CMR TGG m

o prior written approval. c \ l l

i Km

h Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these data are advised that errors in the data may be present.

m 0 5 10 15 20 25

2 ! h

c ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE \ \

! 120°0'0"W

ek Spread 5a Cre ss ri 197 C *#.! BLACK PINES OP97 Porcupine Meadows PROPOSED Provincial Park PUMP STATION ¯ Arrowstone 200 Provincial Park Little Shuswap Lake KP 825 .! 210 C A C HE Kamloops

Lake r C R E EK e v i 220 R n o s p A S H C ROFT m KAMLOOPS o Th KAMLOOPS th T TERMINAL ") Sou

h

o 230 m .! p Tunkwa 1 s OP o

n Provincial

R Park

i

v

e r OP5A

240 5 OP OP97 L O G AN L A KE .! KP 875 250

8 OP Stump Lake lmon Rive r Sa 260

KP 900 270 .!

Nicola Lake Douglas 280 OP5A Lake .! KP 925 MERRITT

290 N " 0 1 '

Pennask 0 OP ° 0 Lake 5 N " 0 ' 0 ° 0 5 300 Trepanier .! KP 950 Provincial Park WEST .! KINGSVALE PUMP KELOWNA STATION

310 d x m . Missezula PEACHLAND a 5 d a Lake e r p S _ 4

0 .! KP 975 v e R

_ 97 8 OP 8 9 0 0 _

S 320 A E _ M 2 H C _ P A M _ 1 0 7 1

0 SUMMERLAND 2 \

d 330 a *# e r

p Spread 5b S y 5A B

\ OP w KP 1000 e i v .! r e v O z \ 4

0 120°0'0"W v e R \ 8 8 9 0 0 ! _ .

S BRITISH Kilometre Post (KP) Village / Hamlet Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement A ALBERTA E

_ COLUMBIA M 2

H Dawson ") Terminal !(1 Highway National Park C Creek Grande (!2 _ Prairie P

A 97 (! 43 M (! ENVIRONMENTAL _ .!

1 Pump Station Railway Provincial Park 0

7 Edmonton ALIGNMENT SHEETS OVERVIEW - 1 Prince 0 16 2 George (! Hinton BLACK PINES TO HOPE \ S Edson *# Construction Spread Break Environmental Alignment Sheet Park / Protected Area / Conservancy Area A

E SPREAD 5A \ Quesnel Red S Valemount Jasper E Deer L I F Blue River _ (!2 Trans Mountain Expansion Project City / Town / District Municipality Provincial Boundary P Williams TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT A Lake 97 Calgary M (! \ (!1 P Darfield E

M Kamloops MAP NUMBER PAGE T .! - S I Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N. 201701_MAP_CH2M_EAS_00988_REV04_SPREAD5A SHEET 3 OF 6 G Kelowna \ Facilities: provided by KMC 2012; Proposed KPs and Centreline SSEID005.1: provided by UPI, April 20, 2017; Transportation: IHS Inc. 2016, BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan 2015; Geopolitical R DATE CH2M REF. REVISION 3

N (!

C Vancouver Boundaries: NRCan 2003, AltaLIS 2016, BC MFLNRO 2007, IHS Inc. 2010 & ESRI 2005; First Nation Lands: AltaLIS 2010, Government of Canada 2016 & IHS Inc. 2015; Hydrology: IHS Inc. 2004; October 2017 664818 04 \ s (Burnaby) Hope e Parks and Protected Areas: ATPR 2012, BC MFLNRO 2008, NRCan 2016 & AltaLIS 2012; Canadian Hillshade: TERA Environmental Consultants 2008; US Hillshade: ESRI 2009. SCALE PAGE SIZE DISCIPLINE r a US A h 1:500,000 11x17 EAS S \ n DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN

o This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary to KMC and is not to be provided to any other m recipient without the written consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying purposes, nor for doing any work on or around KMC's pipelines and facilities, all of which require KMC's AJ CMR TGG m o prior written approval. c \ l Km l i h 0 5 10 15 20

m Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these data are advised that errors in the data may be present. 2 h ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE c \ \ 121°0'0"W

ENVIRONMENTAL ALIGNMENT 330 *# SHEETS OVERVIEW - Spread 5b HOPE TO WESTRIDGE ¯ SPREAD 5B TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT

.! Kilometre Post (KP) .! KP 1000 ") Terminal

.! Pump Station 340 *# Construction Spread Break

Trans Mountain Expansion Project

Village / Hamlet

!(1 Highway Harrison Lake Railway N " 0 ' 0 3 ° F 9 Environmental Alignment Sheet 4

r N "

a 0 ' 0

s 3

° City / Town / District Municipality 9

e 4

r

R 350 Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement

i v National Park

e

r Provincial Park

KP 1025 .! Park / Protected Area / Conservancy Area

National Boundary

Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N. Facilities: provided by KMC 2013; Proposed KPs and Centreline SSEID005.1: provided by UPI, April 20, 2017; Transportation: IHS Inc.

d 2016, BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan 2015; Geopolitical Boundaries: x NRCan 2003, AltaLIS 2016, IHS Inc. 2010 & ESRI 2005; First Nation m . b Lands: AltaLIS 2010, Government of Canada 2016 & IHS Inc. 2015;

5 360 d HOPE Hydrology: IHS Inc. 2004; Parks and Protected Areas: ATPR 2012, a e

r NRCan 2016 & AltaLIS 2012; Edmonton TUC: Alberta Infrastructure p

S 2015; Canadian Hillshade: TERA Environmental Consultants 2008; US _

4 Hillshade: ESRI 2009. 0 v e

R Sasquatch This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by _

8 the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary

8 Provincial Park 370 .! to KMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written 9

0 consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying 0 HOPE _ purposes, nor for doing any work on or around KMC's pipelines and facilities, S

A .! PRESSURE all of which require KMC's prior written approval. E _ CONTROL STATION M

2 KP 1050 H C _ P A M _

1 3 0

7 OP 1 0 2

\ Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated d with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of a

e these data are advised that errors in the data may be present. r p S y B \ w e i v r B R IT ISH e HARR ISON AL B E RTA v O z HOT SPR INGS C O LU MBIA \ 4 0 v 380 e Dawson R Grande (!2 \ Creek

8 Prairie 8 97 9 (! (!43 0 0 _ S Prince A Edmonton E George _ (!16 M Hinton

2 Edson H

C Quesnel Red _ Deer P KENT Valemount Jasper A

M Blue River _ (!2 1 Williams 0

7 Lake (!97 Calgary 1 1 0 Darfield (! 2 \

S Kamloops A E \ S

E Kelowna L I F

_ Wahleach (!3 P Vancouver A Lake (Burnaby) Hope M

\ 9 US A P OP E M T

- MAP NUMBER PAGE S I

G 201701_MAP_CH2M_EAS_00988_REV04_SPREAD5B SHEET 4 OF 6 \ R DATE REVISION N CH2M REF. C

\ 390 September 2017 664818 s Spread 6 04 e r a .! SCALE PAGE SIZE DISCIPLINE h *# S

\ 1:215,000 11x17 EAS n KP 1075 o DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN m

m AJ CMR TGG o c \ l Copyright:© 2014 Esri l i km h

m 0 5 10

2 121°0'0"W h c ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE \ \ 122°0'0"W

ENVIRONMENTAL ALIGNMENT Sasquatch SHEETS OVERVIEW - Provincial Park HOPE TO WESTRIDGE ¯ SPREAD 6 Stave Lake TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT

.! Kilometre Post (KP)

") Terminal Golden Ears Provincial Park Alouette .! Pump Station Lake HARR ISON *# Construction Spread Break Davis Lake HOT SPR INGS Provincial Park 380 Trans Mountain Expansion Project

Village / Hamlet

!(1 Highway

KENT Railway PITT MEADOWS Environmental Alignment Sheet

City / Town / District Municipality

Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement OP9 MAPLE National Park RIDGE Spread 6 Provincial Park

390 *#.! Park / Protected Area / KP 1075 Conservancy Area MISSION National Boundary

Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N. Facilities: provided by KMC 2013; Proposed KPs and Centreline .! OP7 SSEID005.1: provided by UPI, April 20, 2017; Transportation: IHS Inc. 2016, BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan 2015; Geopolitical Boundaries: d

x NRCan 2003, AltaLIS 2016, IHS Inc. 2010 & ESRI 2005; First Nation

m KP 1150 . Lands: AltaLIS 2010, Government of Canada 2016 & IHS Inc. 2015; 6

d Hydrology: IHS Inc. 2004; Parks and Protected Areas: ATPR 2012,

a Spread 7 400 e

r NRCan 2016 & AltaLIS 2012; Edmonton TUC: Alberta Infrastructure p

S *# 2015; Canadian Hillshade: TERA Environmental Consultants 2008; US _

4 Hillshade: ESRI 2009. 0 v e

R This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by

_ the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary 8

8 to KMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written 9 440 0 1 consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying 0 OP _ purposes, nor for doing any work on or around KMC's pipelines and facilities, S

A all of which require KMC's prior written approval. E

_ CHILLIWACK M 2 H C _ P

A KP 1100 M

_ .! 1 0

7 410 1

0 430 2 ! Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated \ .

d with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of a

e these data are advised that errors in the data may be present. r

p KP 1125 S y

B SUMAS \

w ") TERMINAL e i v

r B R IT ISH

e AL B E RTA v

O C O LU MBIA z \

4 420 0 v

e Dawson

R Grande (!2 \ Creek Prairie 8 Cultus 8 97 43 9 (! (!

0 TOWNS HIP OF Lake 0 _ S LANGLEY Prince A Edmonton E George _ (!16 M Hinton

2 Edson H

C Quesnel Red _ Deer P Cultus Lake Valemount Jasper A

M Blue River _ Provincial Park (!2 1 Williams 0

7 Lake (!97 Calgary 1 AB BOTSFORD 1 0 Darfield (! 2 \ S

N Kamloops A " E 0 \ British Colum ' S bia (CANADA) 0 E °

N Kelowna L 9 " I 4 F 0 '

_ 3 0 (! P

° Vancouver A 9 (Burnaby) Hope 4 M

\ US A P E M T

- MAP NUMBER PAGE S I

G 201701_MAP_CH2M_EAS_00988_REV04_SPREAD6 SHEET 5 OF 6 \ R DATE REVISION N CH2M REF. C

\ September 2017 664818 s 04 e r

a SCALE PAGE SIZE DISCIPLINE h S

\ 1:200,000 11x17 EAS n

o DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN m

m AJ CMR TGG o c \

l Copyright:© 2014 Esri l

i km h

m 0 5 10

2 122°0'0"W h

c ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE \ \ Whiskey Vancouver Harbour Sasamat Burrard Inlet Cove Indian Arm Lake Bedwell Bay COQU ITLAM Loon Lake Jacobs Lake ENVIRONMENTAL ALIGNMENT Belcarra Bay SHEETS OVERVIEW - Indian HOPE TO WESTRIDGE Arm ¯ SPREAD 7 Westridge TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT Burrard Inlet Blaney Lake Sturgeon .! Kilometre Post (KP) Lateral Vancouver Slough WESTRIDGE Harbour Sturgeon Goose Lake ") Terminal MARINE Slough TERMINAL Lafarge Lake *#") .! Pump Station PORT MOO DY *# Construction Spread Break 472 Trans Mountain Expansion Project

BURNABY 470 TERMINAL Village / Hamlet ") *# !(1 Highway Westridge Lateral PORT Spread 7 end COQU ITLAM PITT Como Lake MEADOWS Railway Munday Lake Environmental Alignment Sheet

City / Town / District Municipality

Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement .! Burnaby Lake National Park Deer Lake KP 1175 Provincial Park

BUR NABY 460 Park / Protected Area / Conservancy Area

National Boundary

Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N. Facilities: provided by KMC 2013; Proposed KPs and Centreline SSEID005.1: provided by UPI, April 20, 2017; Transportation: IHS Inc. 2016, BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan 2015; Geopolitical Boundaries: d

x NRCan 2003, AltaLIS 2016, IHS Inc. 2010 & ESRI 2005; First Nation m

. Lands: AltaLIS 2010, Government of Canada 2016 & IHS Inc. 2015; 7 d Hydrology: IHS Inc. 2004; Parks and Protected Areas: ATPR 2012, a e

r NRCan 2016 & AltaLIS 2012; Edmonton TUC: Alberta Infrastructure p

S 2015; Canadian Hillshade: TERA Environmental Consultants 2008; US _

4 Hillshade: ESRI 2009. 0 v e

R This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by

_ the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary 8

8 to KMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written 9

0 consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying 0

_ purposes, nor for doing any work on or around KMC's pipelines and facilities,

S NEW

A all of which require KMC's prior written approval. E

_ WES TMINSTER M 2 H C _

P 450 A M _

1 North Arm 0 7 1 0

2 Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated \ d with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of a

e these data are advised that errors in the data may be present. r p S y B \ w e i v r B R IT ISH e AL B E RTA v

O C O LU MBIA z \ 4

0 .! v e KP 1150 Dawson R Grande (!2 \ Creek Prairie 8

8 97 43 9 (! (! 0 0 _ S Prince A Edmonton E Spread 7 George _ (!16 M Hinton

2 Edson

H Annieville C Quesnel Red _ Deer P Channel Valemount Jasper A

M Blue River _ (!2 1 Williams 0

7 Lake (!97 Calgary 1 *# 1 0 Darfield (! 2 \

S Kamloops A E \ S

E Kelowna L I F

_ (!3 P Vancouver A (Burnaby) Hope M

\ US A P E M T

- MAP NUMBER PAGE S I SUR REY G 201701_MAP_CH2M_EAS_00988_REV04_SPREAD7 SHEET 6 OF 6 \ R DATE REVISION N CH2M REF. C

\ September 2017 664818 s 04 e r

a SCALE PAGE SIZE DISCIPLINE h S

\ 1:90,000 11x17 EAS n o DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN m

m AJ CMR TGG o c \ l Copyright:© 2014 Esri l i km h

m 0 1 2 3 4 2 h c ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE \ \