Whole Genome Data Provides Evidence of Divergent Selection And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whole Genome Data Provides Evidence of Divergent Selection And Whole genome data provides evidence of divergent selection and gene flow between two populations of red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica with implications for conservation Grace Walsh Degree project in biology, Master of science (2 years), 2021 Examensarbete i biologi 60 hp till masterexamen, 2021 Biology Education Centre and Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Supervisors: Jacob Höglund and Barry John McMahon External opponent: Chaz Hyseni ABSTRACT Red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica are endangered in Ireland but are widespread in other parts of their range. Their decline in Ireland is attributed to increases in generalist predators and habitat loss due to changing land use. Once widespread in Ireland, its population is now reduced and fragmented. For the effective conservation of this species, an understanding of genomic diversity and local adaptation can be important. In this study whole-genome sequencing of contemporary and historic samples was used to assess the level of differentiation, inbreeding and population structure between two populations of red grouse as well as to identify candidate genes putatively under divergent selection. Irish and English populations are shown to be differentiated (FST=0.095). There is clear population structure between English and Irish red grouse, with evidence of admixture into the Irish population. This is evidence of gene flow from the English to the Irish population. There were signs of recent inbreeding in the contemporary Irish population more so than in the historical or English samples. The contemporary Irish population has significantly more long runs of homozygosity than the other two populations. Outlier analysis between the contemporary samples identified 661 candidate genes under putative divergent selection. These were involved in a large variety of processes including immune response, pigmentation and food intake. This study provides more evidence that Irish red grouse are locally adapted and stressed that conservation efforts should focus on conserving the Irish population as one unit. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 STUDY SPECIES ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Red Grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica) ........................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Taxonomic status and overview of genetic studies .......................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Parasite mediated selection ............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.4 Pigmentation .................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 STUDY OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................ 9 2. METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 STUDY SAMPLES .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 DNA EXTRACTIONS ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.3 LIBRARY PREPARATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.4 SEQUENCING ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.5 MAPPING AND SNP CALLING ............................................................................................................... 10 2.6 ANALYSES ........................................................................................................................................... 12 2.6.1 Genetic diversity............................................................................................................................. 12 2.6.2 Population structure and local adaptation using pcadapt ............................................................. 12 2.6.3 Analysis of Admixture .................................................................................................................... 12 2.6.4 Fst outlier analysis ......................................................................................................................... 12 2.6.5 Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis ...................................................................................... 13 2.6.6 Runs of Homozygosity analysis ...................................................................................................... 13 3. RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 SEQUENCES, MAPPING AND SNP CALLING .......................................................................................... 13 3.2 GENETIC DIVERSITY ............................................................................................................................ 13 3.3 PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND OUTLIER DETECTION ............................................................. 14 3.4 ANALYSIS OF ADMIXTURE ................................................................................................................... 14 3.5 WINDOW-BASED FST SCANS ................................................................................................................. 15 3.6 OUTLIER ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.6.1 Immune response ............................................................................................................................ 16 3.6.2 Pigmentation .................................................................................................................................. 19 3.6.3 General genes and outlier method overlaps .................................................................................. 21 3.6.4 Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis ...................................................................................... 24 3.7 RUNS OF HOMOZYGOSITY ................................................................................................................... 24 3.7.1 Short/medium ROH ........................................................................................................................ 25 3.7.2 Long ROH ...................................................................................................................................... 25 4. DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................................. 26 4.1 GENETIC DIVERSITY............................................................................................................................. 26 4.2 GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION ................................................................................................................. 27 4.3 OUTLIER ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................. 28 4.3.1 Immune response ............................................................................................................................ 28 4.3.2 Pigmentation .................................................................................................................................. 29 4.3.3 Other relevant genes ...................................................................................................................... 30 4.3.4 Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis ...................................................................................... 31 4.4 RUNS OF HOMOZYGOSITY ................................................................................................................... 32 4.5 MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS ............................................................................................................. 33 4.6 STUDY LIMITATIONS............................................................................................................................ 34 4.7 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 34 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 35 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 36 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. 47 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Current global extinction rates are 100-1000 higher than what is considered to be the natural background
Recommended publications
  • Silkworm Z Chromosome Is Enriched in Testis-Specific Genes
    Supporting Information http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/genetics.108.099994/DC1 Silkworm Z Chromosome is Enriched in Testis-Specific Genes K. P. Arunkumar, Kazuei Mita and J. Nagaraju Copyright © 2009 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.099994 2 SI K. Arunkumar et al. File S1 Gene Ontology annotation GO annotation generates a dynamic controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all organisms, even while knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is still accumulating and changing. To this end, the Seqdblite FASTA sequence flat file was downloaded from the GO database. By running BLAST against Seqdblite, closest homologue was identified. From BLAST output, molecular functions, biological processes and cellular localisation were parsed by building an in-house GO database in MySQL from the GO-term-database flat file, downloaded from Gene Ontology Database Downloads (http://www.godatabase.org/dev/). The Perl-DBI was used to interface with MySQL, to extract the parent terms of each individual GO term that are obtained by parsing BLAST output. The output was then represented graphically. All ESTs were assigned a biological process, molecular function and cellular component using Gene Ontology (GO) database. The closest annotated homologue in the GO database was used for assigning these categories. The results of the GO annotation are graphically represented in Figures S1-3. Many of the gene products were found to be localized in cell (42%). In cell, gene products were predominant in intracellular region (78%) which comprised of localizations in intracellular organelle (38%) and cytoplasm (29%). The other localizations were organelle (29%) followed by protein complex (18%) (Figure S1).
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early
    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Proteome-Wide Survey of the Autoimmune Target Repertoire In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Proteome-wide survey of the autoimmune target repertoire in autoimmune polyendocrine Received: 28 October 2015 Accepted: 23 December 2015 syndrome type 1 Published: 01 February 2016 Nils Landegren1,2,*, Donald Sharon3,4,*, Eva Freyhult2,5,6, Åsa Hallgren1,2, Daniel Eriksson1,2, Per-Henrik Edqvist7, Sophie Bensing8, Jeanette Wahlberg9, Lawrence M. Nelson10, Jan Gustafsson11, Eystein S Husebye12, Mark S Anderson13, Michael Snyder3 & Olle Kämpe1,2 Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS1) is a monogenic disorder that features multiple autoimmune disease manifestations. It is caused by mutations in the Autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene, which promote thymic display of thousands of peripheral tissue antigens in a process critical for establishing central immune tolerance. We here used proteome arrays to perform a comprehensive study of autoimmune targets in APS1. Interrogation of established autoantigens revealed highly reliable detection of autoantibodies, and by exploring the full panel of more than 9000 proteins we further identified MAGEB2 and PDILT as novel major autoantigens in APS1. Our proteome-wide assessment revealed a marked enrichment for tissue-specific immune targets, mirroringAIRE ’s selectiveness for this category of genes. Our findings also suggest that only a very limited portion of the proteome becomes targeted by the immune system in APS1, which contrasts the broad defect of thymic presentation associated with AIRE-deficiency and raises novel questions what other factors are needed for break of tolerance. Autoimmune responses can ultimately be defined at the molecular level by the specific interaction between T- or B-cell receptors and a distinct self-molecule. In tissue-specific autoimmune disorders the immune system typically target molecules that are exclusively expressed in the affected tissue and involve a combined cellular and humoral response with cognate specificities1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • 75 2. INTRODUCTION Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
    [Frontiers in Bioscience, Scholar, 11, 75-88, March 1, 2019] The persisting puzzle of racial disparity in triple negative breast cancer: looking through a new lens Chakravarthy Garlapati1, Shriya Joshi1, Bikram Sahoo1, Shobhna Kapoor2, Ritu Aneja1 1Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, India TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Dissecting the TNBC racially disparate burden 3.1. Does race influence TNBC onset and progression? 3.2. Tumor microenvironment in TNBC and racial disparity 3.3. Differential gene signatures and pathways in racially distinct TNBC 3.4. Our Perspective: Looking racial disparity through a new lens 4. Conclusion 5. Acknowledgement 6. References 1. ABSTRACT 2. INTRODUCTION Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), is characterized by the absence of estrogen a subtype of breast cancer (BC), accounts for and progesterone receptors and absence 15-20% of all BC diagnoses in the US. It has of amplification of human epidermal growth been recognized that women of African descent factor receptor (HER2). This disease has no are twice as likely to develop TNBC than approved treatment with a poor prognosis women of European descent (1). As the name particularly in African-American (AA) as foretells, TNBCs lack estrogen, progesterone, compared to European-American (EA) and human epidermal growth factor receptors. patients. Gene ontology analysis showed Unfortunately, TNBCs are defined by what they specific gene pathways that are differentially “lack” rather than what they “have” and thus this regulated and gene signatures that are negative nomenclature provides no actionable differentially expressed in AA as compared to information on “druggable” targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Figure and Table Legends
    Supplemental figure and table legends Supplementary Figure 1: KIAA1841 is well conserved among vertebrates. NCBI HomoloGene pairwise alignment scores of human KIAA1841 sequence compared to other vertebrate orthologs. Supplementary Figure 2: µ-germline transcripts (GLT) and AID mRNA expression are not affected by overexpression of KIAA1841. Splenic B cells were isolated from wild-type mice, and transduced with retroviral vector control (pMIG) or a vector expressing KIAA1841. Levels of µ-GLT and AID mRNA were determined at 72h post-infection by RT-qPCR, and normalized to -actin mRNA and the pMIG control. The mean of three independent experiments +/- SD is shown. NS, p = not significant, p 0.05, two-tailed paired student’s t-test. Supplementary Figure 3: Overexpression of untagged and Xpress-tagged KIAA1841 does not affect cell proliferation. Splenic B cells were isolated from wild-type mice, stimulated with LPS+IL4, and transduced with retroviral vector control (pMIG) or a vector expressing KIAA1841 or Xpress (Xp)-tagged KIAA1841. Cells are labeled with seminaphthorhodafluor (SNARF) cell tracking dye and SNARF intensity was measured at 0h, 24h, and 48h after retroviral infection. Histograms of transduced cells (GFP+) for pMIG control, KIAA1841 and Xp-KIAA1841 were superimposed at each time point. Three independent retroviral infection experiments are shown. Supplementary Figure 4: Sequence alignment of the putative SANT domain of KIAA1841 with the SANT domain of SWI3. Alignment was performed using ClustalOmega; *, conserved residue, :, strongly similar residues, ., weakly similar residues. Numbers indicate amino acid residues in each sequence. Helix 3, which has been reported to be important for the chromatin remodeling function of SWI3 (Boyer et.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S2.A-B. Differentially Expressed Genes Following Activation of OGR1 by Acidic Ph in Mouse Peritoneal Macrophages Ph 6.7 24 H
    Table S2.A-B. Differentially expressed genes following activation of OGR1 by acidic pH in mouse peritoneal macrophages pH 6.7 24 h. A. Gene List, including gene process B. Complete Table (Excel). Rank Symbol Full name Involved in: WT/KO (Reference: Gene Card, NCBI, JAX, Uniprot, Ratio unless otherwise indicated) 1. Cyp11a1 Cholesterol side chain cleavage Cholesterol, lipid or steroid metabolism. enzyme, mitochondrial (Cytochrome Catalyses the side-chain cleavage reaction of P450 11A1) cholesterol to pregnenolone. 2. Sparc Secreted acidic cysteine rich Cell adhesion, wound healing, ECM glycoprotein (Osteonectin, Basement interactions, bone mineralization. Activates membrane protein 40 (BM-40)) production and activity of matrix metalloproteinases. 3. Tpsb2 Tryptase beta-2 or tryptase II (trypsin- Inflammatory response, proteolysis. like serine protease) 4. Inhba Inhibin Beta A or Activin beta-A chain Immune response and mediators of inflammation and tissue repair.2-5 5. Cpe Carboxypeptidase E Insulin processing, proteolysis. 6. Igfbp7 Insulin-like growth factor-binding Stimulates prostacyclin (PGI2) production and protein 7 cell adhesion. Induced by retinoic acid. 7. Clu Clusterin Chaperone-mediated protein folding, positive regulation of NF-κB transcription factor activity. Protects cells against apoptosis and cytolysis by complement. Promotes proteasomal degradation of COMMD1 and IKBKB. 8. Cma1 Chymase 1 Cellular response to glucose stimulus, interleukin-1 beta biosynthetic process. Possible roles: vasoactive peptide generation, extracellular matrix degradation. 9. Sfrp4 Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 Negative regulation of Wnt signalling. Increases apoptosis during ovulation. Phosphaturic effects by specifically inhibiting sodium-dependent phosphate uptake. 10. Ephx2 Bifunctional epoxide hydrolase Cholesterol homeostasis, xenobiotic metabolism by degrading potentially toxic epoxides.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,605.243 B2 D'amour Et Al
    USOO9605243B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,605.243 B2 D'Amour et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 28, 2017 (54) MARKERS OF DEFINITIVE ENDODERM 6,117,986 A 9, 2000 Nardone et al. 6,165,993 A 12/2000 Herrmann et al. (71) Applicant: ViaCyte,7 Inc., San Diego, CA (US) 6,251,6716,200,806 B1 3/20016/2001 ThomsonHogan et al. (72) Inventors: Kevin Allen D'Amour, San Diego, CA 3. R 1658 R.S.A. (US); Alan D. Agulnick, San Diego, 6,506,574 B1 1/2003 Rambhatla et al. CA (US); Emmanuel Edward Baetge, 6,872,389 B1 3/2005 Faris Encinitas, CA (US) 6,921,811 B2 7/2005 Zamora et al. s 7,033,831 B2 4/2006 Fisk et al. 7,153,684 B1 12/2006 Hogan (73) Assignee: ViaCyte, Inc., San Diego, CA (US) 7.256,042 B2 8/2007 Rambhatla et al. - 7,326,572 B2 2/2008 Fisk et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 7,510,876 B2 3/2009 D'Amour et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 23: R: 258 Nation et al U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 8,586,357- I k B2 11/2013 D'Amour'Amour et al. 2002/00721 17 A1 6/2002 Xu et al. (21) Appl. No.: 14/066,441 2002/0090723 A1 7/2002 Carpenter et al. 2003. O138948 A1 7/2003 Fisk et al. (22) Filed: Oct. 29, 2013 2003. O138949 A1 7/2003 Bhushan et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silkworm Z Chromosome Is Enriched in Testis-Specific Genes
    Copyright Ó 2009 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.099994 The Silkworm Z Chromosome Is Enriched in Testis-Specific Genes K. P. Arunkumar,* Kazuei Mita† and J. Nagaraju*,1 *Centre of Excellence for Genetics and Genomics of Silkmoths, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Tuljaguda, Nampally, Hyderabad 500001, India and †National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Owashi 1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan Manuscript received December 22, 2008 Accepted for publication March 22, 2009 ABSTRACT The role of sex chromosomes in sex determination has been well studied in diverse groups of or- ganisms. However, the role of the genes on the sex chromosomes in conferring sexual dimorphism is still being experimentally evaluated. An unequal complement of sex chromosomes between two sexes makes them amenable to sex-specific evolutionary forces. Sex-linked genes preferentially expressed in one sex over the other offer a potential means of addressing the role of sex chromosomes in sexual dimorphism. We examined the testis transcriptome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori, which has a ZW chromosome constitution in the female and ZZ in the male, and show that the Z chromosome harbors a significantly higher number of genes expressed preferentially in testis compared to the autosomes. We hypothesize that sexual antagonism and absence of dosage compensation have possibly led to the accumulation of many male-specific genes on the Z chromosome. Further, our analysis of testis-specific paralogous genes suggests that the accumulation on the Z chromosome of genes advantageous to males has occurred primarily by translocation or tandem duplication.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Low Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary and Its
    Characterization of Low Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary and its Precursor Lesions by Taymaa May A Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for Degree of Masters of Science Institute of Medical Sciences University of Toronto © Copyright by Taymaa May 2008 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-72054-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-72054-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1 Double Treatment Vs Single Treatment
    Supplementary table 1 Double treatment vs single treatment Probe ID Symbol Gene name P value Fold change TC0500007292.hg.1 NIM1K NIM1 serine/threonine protein kinase 1.05E-04 5.02 HTA2-neg-47424007_st NA NA 3.44E-03 4.11 HTA2-pos-3475282_st NA NA 3.30E-03 3.24 TC0X00007013.hg.1 MPC1L mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1-like 5.22E-03 3.21 TC0200010447.hg.1 CASP8 caspase 8, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase 3.54E-03 2.46 TC0400008390.hg.1 LRIT3 leucine-rich repeat, immunoglobulin-like and transmembrane domains 3 1.86E-03 2.41 TC1700011905.hg.1 DNAH17 dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 17 1.81E-04 2.40 TC0600012064.hg.1 GCM1 glial cells missing homolog 1 (Drosophila) 2.81E-03 2.39 TC0100015789.hg.1 POGZ Transcript Identified by AceView, Entrez Gene ID(s) 23126 3.64E-04 2.38 TC1300010039.hg.1 NEK5 NIMA-related kinase 5 3.39E-03 2.36 TC0900008222.hg.1 STX17 syntaxin 17 1.08E-03 2.29 TC1700012355.hg.1 KRBA2 KRAB-A domain containing 2 5.98E-03 2.28 HTA2-neg-47424044_st NA NA 5.94E-03 2.24 HTA2-neg-47424360_st NA NA 2.12E-03 2.22 TC0800010802.hg.1 C8orf89 chromosome 8 open reading frame 89 6.51E-04 2.20 TC1500010745.hg.1 POLR2M polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide M 5.19E-03 2.20 TC1500007409.hg.1 GCNT3 glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 3, mucin type 6.48E-03 2.17 TC2200007132.hg.1 RFPL3 ret finger protein-like 3 5.91E-05 2.17 HTA2-neg-47424024_st NA NA 2.45E-03 2.16 TC0200010474.hg.1 KIAA2012 KIAA2012 5.20E-03 2.16 TC1100007216.hg.1 PRRG4 proline rich Gla (G-carboxyglutamic acid) 4 (transmembrane) 7.43E-03 2.15 TC0400012977.hg.1 SH3D19
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for Proteomics DOI 10.1002/Pmic.200500648
    Supporting Information for Proteomics DOI 10.1002/pmic.200500648 Fiona M. McCarthy, Amanda M. Cooksey, Nan Wang, Susan M. Bridges, G. Todd Pharr and Shane C. Burgess Modeling a whole organ using proteomics: The avian bursa of Fabricius ª 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.proteomics-journal.com Supporting Text: Determining Tissue Expression Patterns for Transcription Factors. We identified 107 transcription factors (TFs) from post-hatch bursas. Since the Transfac database (1) did not contain all of these TFs, we used PubMed literature searches to determine expression patterns for each. For each transcription factor, we searched PubMed for a combination of the protein and gene names, as determined by both NCBI and UniProt records. For example, Pax7 (gi:2576239; UniProt O42349) was searched as both PAX7 and Pax-7. In each case, articles were manually searched to confirm TF expression. We combined the TF names with the following terms to obtain reported tissue expression patterns: 1. Expression in the bursa. AND bursa* OR DT40 eg. (Pax7 OR “Pax-7”) AND (bursa* OR DT40) returned no items. 2. Expression in immune tissue. AND lymphocyte* OR leukocyte* OR “bone marrow” OR spleen OR “embryonic liver” OR hematopoietic eg. (Pax7 OR “Pax-7”) AND (lymphocyte* OR leukocyte* OR “bone marrow” OR spleen OR “embryonic liver” OR hematopoietic) returned 17 articles. 3. Expression during development. AND development OR embryo* eg. (Pax7 OR “Pax-7”) AND (development OR embryo*) returned 135 articles. 4. Expression in nervous tissue. AND neuron* OR nervous OR CNS OR retina* 1 eg. (Pax7 OR “Pax-7”) AND (neuron* OR nervous OR CNS OR retina*) returned 53 articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptome Profiling Reveals the Complexity of Pirfenidone Effects in IPF
    ERJ Express. Published on August 30, 2018 as doi: 10.1183/13993003.00564-2018 Early View Original article Transcriptome profiling reveals the complexity of pirfenidone effects in IPF Grazyna Kwapiszewska, Anna Gungl, Jochen Wilhelm, Leigh M. Marsh, Helene Thekkekara Puthenparampil, Katharina Sinn, Miroslava Didiasova, Walter Klepetko, Djuro Kosanovic, Ralph T. Schermuly, Lukasz Wujak, Benjamin Weiss, Liliana Schaefer, Marc Schneider, Michael Kreuter, Andrea Olschewski, Werner Seeger, Horst Olschewski, Malgorzata Wygrecka Please cite this article as: Kwapiszewska G, Gungl A, Wilhelm J, et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals the complexity of pirfenidone effects in IPF. Eur Respir J 2018; in press (https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00564-2018). This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJ online. Copyright ©ERS 2018 Copyright 2018 by the European Respiratory Society. Transcriptome profiling reveals the complexity of pirfenidone effects in IPF Grazyna Kwapiszewska1,2, Anna Gungl2, Jochen Wilhelm3†, Leigh M. Marsh1, Helene Thekkekara Puthenparampil1, Katharina Sinn4, Miroslava Didiasova5, Walter Klepetko4, Djuro Kosanovic3, Ralph T. Schermuly3†, Lukasz Wujak5, Benjamin Weiss6, Liliana Schaefer7, Marc Schneider8†, Michael Kreuter8†, Andrea Olschewski1,
    [Show full text]