DOCSLIB.ORG

A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah 2 ai a$ A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF 3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN •8 73 THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE PI r 2 2 NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH 5> -7<3 > by t/i Vi David B. Madsen PI i/i 2i/i zt»i H o > 73 ft B > p] O r o o n • r 73 PI C/l O 3 73 ft PI (/i H B 2 H B PI o •73 Z iO n73 > 1/3 PI PI n/I > r zc H PI Z o z • r 2 o z G 2 zpi H G Q i/i ft CIRCULAR 95 1997 | UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY e S" a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen CIRCULAR 95 1997 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien Public-at-Large C. William Berge Mineral Industry Jerry Golden Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth Economics-Business/Scientific David Terry, Director, Trust Lands Administration Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow Editor Vicky Clarke, Sharon Hamre Graphic Artists Patricia H. Speranza, James W. Parker, Lori Douglas Cartographers UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY is organized into five geologic programs with Administration, Editorial, and Computer Resources providing necessary support to the programs. The ECONOMIC GEOLOGY PROGRAM undertakes studies to identify coal, geothermal, uranium, hydrocarbon, and industrial and metallic resources; initiates detailed studies of these resources including mining dis­ trict and field studies; develops computerized resource data bases, to answer state, federal, and industry requests for information; and encourages the prudent development of Utah's geologic resources. The APPLIED GEOLOGY PROGRAM responds to requests from local and state governmental entities for engineering-geologic investigations; and identifies, documents, and interprets Utah's geologic hazards. The GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM maps the bedrock and surficial geology of the state at a regional scale by county and at a more detailed scale by quadrangle. The GEOLOGIC EXTENSION SERVICE answers inquiries from the public and provides information about Utah's geology in a non-technical format. The ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES PROGRAM maintains and publish­ es records of Utah's fossil resources, provides paleontological and archeological recovery services to state and local governments, con­ ducts studies of environmental change to aid resource management, and evaluates the quantity and quality of Utah's ground-water resources. The UGS Library is open to the public and contains many reference works on Utah geology and many unpublished documents on aspects of Utah geology by UGS staff and others. The UGS has several computer data bases with information on mineral and energy resources, geologic hazards, stratigraphic sections, and bibliographic references. Most files may be viewed by using the UGS Library. The UGS also manages a sample library which contains core, cuttings, and soil samples from mineral and petroleum drill holes and engineer­ ing geology investigations. Samples may be viewed at the Sample Library or requested as a loan for outside study. The UGS publishes the results of its investigations in the form of maps, reports, and compilations of data that are accessible to the public. For information on UGS publications, contact the Department of Natural Resources Bookstore, 1594 W. North Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116, (801) 537-3320. The Utah Department of Natural Resources receives federal aid and prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, age, national origin, or disability. For information or complaints regarding discrimination, contact Executive Director, Utah Department of Natural Resources, 1594 West North Temple #3710, Box 145610, Salt Lake City, UT 84116-5610 or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1801 L Street, NW, Washington DC 20507. TAKEAJ^IN —, UMJAH \/e /$? Printed on recycled paper 3/97 PREFACE The purpose of this report is to provide a preliminary inventory of the archeological resources within the newly created Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument for two principal reasons. First, in establishing the monument, President Clinton proclaimed the opportunities for scientific study, expounding at length on the archeological resources and sites. He directed the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to develop a management plan for the monument within three years. Information on the location, extent, and importance of archeological resources needs to be available to the monument planners, to archeologists and other scientists, and to the interested public to help determine how these resources will be incorporated into the management plan. Will scientists be allowed to excavate sites? Can a sample be removed for additional study or curation? These and many other questions will have to be answered in the management plan. The more information that can be provided to the BLM, the better they should be able to anticipate the location and size of potential impacts from scientific research. Second, about 176,000 acres of surface lands managed by the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration for the benefit of Utah's school children are within the monument's boundaries. The President promised to trade out School Trust lands ("inholdings") for comparable federal lands elsewhere, presumably in Utah. The Trust Lands contain significant known and potential deposits of minerals and energy resources. In addition, these surface lands contain significant and potentially significant archeological artifacts and sites. There are different opinions about the impact of artifacts and archeological sites on land values. The scientific values are difficult to assess financially and it is generally not even attempted. To place a dollar value on a scientific specimen may tend to establish a price for illegally obtained or stolen pieces. In some real estate markets, however, the presence of archeological sites, along with deed covenants to protect them, actually enhances land values. Alternatively, the presence of scientifically and culturally valuable artifacts may limit or, in rare cases, even prohibit other land development. In these instances, it is argued that the archeological resources have reduced the land value. It is not our intention to enter into these arguments here. Rather, it is the long-term goal of the Utah Geological Survey to provide an inventory of archeology resources on School Trust lands to identify their scientific importance and their impact on potential energy and mineral resource development. The summary information in this report indicates that archeological resources in the monument may be extensive, but that their distribution and locations are not well known. An active program of resource assessment on School Trust lands needs to be completed as part of the inholdings exchange. Longer term, a continuing program of assessment on federal lands, along with recovery and preservation, needs to become part of one of the monument's principal missions: archeological study. M. Lee Allison February, 1997 Other publications on the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument from the Utah Geological Survey: A preliminaiy assessment of energy and mineral resources within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, by M. Lee Allison, Circular 93 A preliminary assessment of paleontological resources within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monu­ ment, Utah by David D. Gillette, State Paleontologist, and Martha C. Hay den, 1997, Circular 96 Topographic map of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah, 1997, Public Information Series 49 CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1 SITE TYPES AND DENSITIES 3 CULTURAL SEQUENCE 6 CONCLUSIONS 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 10 REFERENCES 11 APPENDIX A: Presidential proclamation 12 APPENDIX B: Summary of known archaeological resources on School and Institutional Trust Lands ... 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 2 Figure 2. Location of School and Institutional Trust Lands within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 4 Figure 3. Plot of known archaeological sites in six sections of a township in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 6 Figure 4. Schematic of environmental zones available to prehistoric peoples in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 7 Figure 5. Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 9 INTRODUCTION On September 18,1996, by the authority vested through section 2 of the Antiquities Act of June 8, 1906 (34 Stat. 225,16 U.S.C. 431), President Clinton established by proclamation the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (appendix A). The monument sets aside some 1.7 million acres, or about 2,700 square miles, in southern Utah to be protected for its scientific, historic, biologic, cultural, and scenic attributes. The proclamation cites examples of the attributes of the monument including: (1), exposed sedimentary rock layers that offer unobscured views of stratigraphy and geologic processes; (2) natural features like The Grand Staircase, White and Vermilion Cliffs, Paria Canyon, East Kaibab Monocline (The Cockscomb), Circle Cliffs, Waterpocket
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. ,I!! CIRCULAR 95 . 1997 I~\' UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ." if;~~ 6EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison~ Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) .................................................................................................. Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith ................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ....................................................................................................................... Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ......................................................................................................................... Public-at-Large C. William Berge .............................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ..................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002
    Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 By Dale E. Wilberg and Bernard J. Stolp U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5233 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Salt Lake City, Utah 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 2329 West Orton Circle Building 810 Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Box 25286, Denver Federal Center http://ut.water.usgs.gov Denver, CO 80225-0286 1-888-ASK-USGS iii CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Physical Setting and Hydrogeology..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Includes ¨ Why Go? Day Hikes . .. 140 The largest park in the Southwest, Grand Staircase-Escalante Overnight Hikes . 144 National Monument (GSENM) features spectacular scenery Driving . 145 in rough-cut wilderness. From the Grand Canyon floor, geo- Cycling . 149 logical strata climb in staircase fashion 3500ft to Bryce Can- yon and the Escalante River canyons. These rock layers tell Sleeping . 149 260 million years of history in a riot of color. The diversity of landscapes is astounding – pink dunes, white cliffs, red canyons, vast slickrock and undulating slot canyons. The monument was established in 1996 by US President Best Hikes Bill Clinton in a controversial designation. Many ranchers and residents were concerned about losing access. Local ¨ Slot Canyons of Dry Fork/ legislators and mining interests were stymied. Environment Coyote Gulch (p142) activists appeared and conflicts ensued. Years later, federal ¨ Willis Creek (p143) versus local control is still a hot issue, though there is also rec- ¨ Lower Calf Creek Falls ognition that the land needs, and deserves, some protection. (p141) ¨ Escalante River Natural Bridge (p140) Driving Distances (miles) Bryce Canyon National Park ¨ Boulder Mail Trail (p144) (Park Entrance) 80 Escalante 30 50 Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (Canonville Visitor Center) 65 15 35 Best Drives Kanab 150 75 120 85 ¨ Burr Trail (p145) Grand Canyon North Rim (Park Entrance) 2157145 190 155 0 ¨ Hole-in-the Rock Road (p145) ) ¨ Cottonwood Canyon Road (p147) e b Boulder Bryce Canyon National Park (Park Entrance) Escalant Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (Canonville Visitor Center Kana Note: Distances are approximate 137 Entrances PARK POLICIES & REGULATIONS There are no entrance stations; the monument is accessible 24/7.
    [Show full text]
  • MINERAL POTENTIAL REPORT for the Lands Now Excluded from Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument
    United States Department ofthe Interior Bureau of Land Management MINERAL POTENTIAL REPORT for the Lands now Excluded from Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah Prepared by: Technical Approval: flirf/tl (Signature) Michael Vanden Berg (Print name) (Print name) Energy and Mineral Program Manager - Utah Geological Survey (Title) (Title) April 18, 2018 /f-P/2ft. 't 2o/ 8 (Date) (Date) M~zr;rL {Signature) 11 (Si~ ~.u.. "'- ~b ~ t:, "4 5~ A.J ~txM:t ;e;,E~ 't"'-. (Print name) (Print name) J.-"' ,·s h;c.-+ (V\ £uA.o...~ fk()~""....:r ~~/,~ L{ ( {Title) . Zo'{_ 2o l~0 +(~it71 ~ . I (Date) (Date) This preliminary repon makes information available to the public that may not conform to UGS technical, editorial. or policy standards; this should be considered by an individual or group planning to take action based on the contents ofthis report. Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding it!I suitability for a panicular use. The Utah Department ofNatural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users ofthis product. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................... 4 Oil, Gas, and Coal Bed Methane ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heart of Coyote Gulch Canyoneering Route • Canyons of the Escalante
    Heart of Coyote Gulch Canyoneering Route • Canyons of the Escalante Rating: 2A 5.4R Best Season: Spring or Fall recommended. Time: 8 to 12 hours. Get an early start. Access: Route starts and ends on a spur road of the Hole in the Rock Road. A 4WD car spot would save you 3 miles of hard walking. USGS 7.5’ Map: King Mesa and Stevens Canyon South Permit: Not required for day use. Free overnight permits required for overnight backpacking, available at VCs and trailheads. Equipment: Wading shoes. Climbing skills. Navigation skills, map and compass. 165’ rope and sling may be useful for belaying the exit slab. Drinking Water: Available in the canyon, should be filtered. Flash Flood Risk: Moderate. Difficulties: The climb out requires solo 5.4 slab climbing above a substantial drop. A 165’ rope may be useful for weaker members of the party. Wow. There's really no other way to say it. This is the place - one of the most sacred places in Utah for me. A splendid, deep, lush canyon cut into the Navajo sandstone. A cathedral. This one has it all. And it has "been discovered". This one-day-blitz is a way-too-quick dash through the heart of Coyote Gulch, with an exciting 5th class exit up a rib, and a bit of cross-country navigating to regain the car. The exit climb should not be underestimated - it is truly 5th class with a lot of exposure. Having a rope for beginners is only marginally useful as there are no established anchors, though there are natural features that can be slung, if you can find them.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Cities and Their Population - 2000-2010
    MAJOR CITIES AND THEIR POPULATION - 2000-2010 CITY 2000 2010 % CHANGE ALTITUDE POPULATION POPULATION Antimony 122 122 0 6,460 Boulder 180 226 25.6 6,580 Bryce Canyon 198 7,700 City Cannonville 148 167 12.8 6,100 Escalante 818 797 -2.6 5,750 Hatch 127 133 4.7 6,998 Henrieville 159 230 44.7 6,100 Tropic 508 530 4.3 6,235 Panguitch 1,623 1,520 -6.3 6,720 LAKES AND WATER STORAGE The biggest lake in the county is Panguitch Lake, 15 miles southwest of Panguitch. It is estimated that that there are 50 or 60 small lakes on the Boulder and Escalante Mountains in the central part of the county. In addition, there are the following water storage reservoirs: Tropic Reservoir- west of Bryce Canyon, Wide Hollow – west of Escalante, Spectacle Lake- northwest of Boulder, Jacob’s Reservoir- Boulder Mountains, Bench Irrigation Co. Reservoir- Antimony, North Creek Reservoir- northwest of Escalante, Dog Valley Reservoir- northwest of Panguitch, Pine Lake- east of Panguitch, Upper and Lower Bounds Reservoirs- east of Boulder Mountain. They are used for the enjoyment of sportsmen and to supply water for livestock grazing in that area as well as for irrigation and culinary purposes. IRRIGATION Securing sufficient water and using it for irrigation of crops is a major problem of this area. In 1892, one fork of the Sevier River was taken over the rim of the “Great Basin” to water the area of Tropic. This is unique in that it is the only place that water is diverted from the Great Basin into another drainage area.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Cities and Their Population- 2000-2010 City
    MAJOR CITIES AND THEIR POPULATION- 2000-2010 CITY 2000 2010 % CHANGE ALTITUDE POPULATION POPULATION Antimony 122 122 0 6,460 Boulder 180 226 25.6 6,580 Bryce Canyon 198 7,700 City Cannonville 148 167 12.8 6,100 Escalante 818 797 -2.6 5,750 Hatch 127 133 4.7 6,998 Henrieville 159 230 44.7 6,100 Tropic 508 530 4.3 6,235 Panguitch 1,623 1,520 -6.3 6,720 LAKES AND WATER STORAGE The biggest lake in the county is Panguitch Lake, 15 miles southwest of Panguitch. It is estimated that that there are 50 or 60 small lakes on the Boulder and Escalante Mountains in the central part of the county. In addition, there are the following water storage reservoirs: Tropic Reservoir- west of Bryce Canyon, Wide Hollow – west of Escalante, Spectacle Lake- northwest of Boulder, Jao’s Reseroir- Boulder Mountains, Bench Irrigation Co. Reservoir- Antimony, North Creek Reservoir- northwest of Escalante, Dog Valley Reservoir- northwest of Panguitch, Pine Lake- east of Panguitch, Upper and Lower Bounds Reservoirs- east of Boulder Mountain. They are used for the enjoyment of sportsmen and to supply water for livestock grazing in that area as well as for irrigation and culinary purposes. IRRIGATION Securing sufficient water and using it for irrigation of crops is a major problem of this area. In , oe fork of the “eier Rier as take oer the ri of the Great Basi to ater the area of Tropic. This is unique in that it is the only place that water is diverted from the Great Basin into another drainage area.
    [Show full text]
  • Canyons of the Escalante Information and Hiking Guide
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glen Canyon National Recreation Area Rainbow Bridge National Monument Canyons of the Escalante Information and Hiking Guide Everett Ruess linocuts taken from Everett Ruess: A Vagabond for Beauty by W. L. Rusho, published by Gibbs-Smith. Used by permission. These days away from the city have been the happiest of my life...It has all been a beautiful dream, sometimes tranquil, sometimes fantastic, and with enough pain and tragedy to make the delights possible by contrast. - Everett Ruess from a letter to his friend Bill soon after beginning his journey. The Escalante Canyons include some of the most remote, wild, and beautiful country in the Southwest. The Escalante, the last river in the continental United States to be named, meanders slowly between towering canyon walls. Its tributaries, also deeply entrenched in sandstone, contain arches, natural bridges, and waterfalls. The area is reminiscent of Glen Canyon before Lake Powell and offers some of the finest opportunities for desert hiking on the Colorado Plateau. National Park Service 1 BASIC INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION AND INFORMATION Public lands in the Escalante area are administered by the National Park Service (Glen Canyon National Recreation Area), the Bureau of Land Management (Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument), and the U.S. Forest Service (Dixie National Forest). Information ABOUT THE ESCALANTE AREA: Escalante Interagency Visitor Information Center, PO Box 511 Escalante, UT 84726 435-826-5499 EMERGENCIES National Park Service: Escalante Ranger Station 435-826-4315 24 Hour Dispatch 800-582-4351 Bureau of Land Management: Escalante Office 435-826-4291 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Staircase Escalante 6 Days/5 Nights DAY 1 DAY 3
    Grand Staircase Escalante 6 days/5 nights DAY 1 DAY 3 Our tour will meet in the afternoon in Moab From the lodge, we’ll begin a downhill ride on and begin with a shuttle through Utah’s most the Burr Trail through the Grand Staircase- spectacular and largely undiscovered terri- Escalante National Monument. After years of tory. The dynamics of the terrain include the San controversy, the first 30 miles of this trail have been Rafael Swell, the sandstone domes of Capitol Reef paved. The ride begins on a high plateau named National Park, the “Mars-like” landscape of Hanks- Durffy Mesa, which is surrounded by interesting ville and finally aspen swept Boulder Mountain. We slickrock formations. As we drop into the narrows of will land at the charming Boulder Mountain Lodge, in Long Canyon, sheer sandstone walls rise for several Boulder, Utah, where you can walk the grounds as hundred feet above us. Along the way we’ll pass the sun sets over the Escalante canyons. We will dine through The Gulch, the Circle Cliffs and Deer Creek together at Hell’s Backbone Grill, the Lodge’s inti- Recreation Area. We will turn off the Burr Trail toward mate restaurant serving five-star cuisine, and antici- the Lamp Stand formation where we will spend the pate the week’s events. next two nights. Our 270 degree view includes the Henry Mountains, Boulder Mountain and Navajo DAY 2 Mountain, a sacred religious place for the Navajos. After spending a comfortable night at the TOTAL MILEAGE: 26 miles Boulder Mountain Lodge in Boulder, Utah we’ll begin our first ride.
    [Show full text]
  • Boatman's Quarterly Review
    boatman’s quarterly review the journal of Grand Canyon River Guides Inc. volume 10 number 1 winter 1996 - 1997 Future of Glen Canyon Dam Katie Lee Future of Science ctober 1, 1955, Glen Canyon… Bridge Canyon Dam Each new discovery surpasses the last—it seems the tougher these canyons are to Openetrate the more beauty they hide. I leave a part of me in the arms of Navajo Selective Withdrawl Canyon; leave blood and tears in exchange for what I’ve seen and will remember all my life. Over, under and around Wingate boulders, thru water in tunnels of tumbled rock, past New Organizations rabbitbush, datura and stunted cottonwood, we make our way to the base of the Kayenta… Ah-hhh, bedrock at last! Whale Foundation As we round a bend and come over a small rise, I feel like I’ve been hit in the middle of my Adopt-A-Beach everything. I grab for Frank’s arm and say, Wait a minute, Bigfeets, I don’t think I can New Fees take much more of this ... it’s too beautiful! Suddenly I’m crying. He nods, takes my hand Farewells and squeezes hard. When I look at him there are tears in his eyes as well. Air Tour Rules I stop to ask myself, what’s here that triggers an emotion so overwhelming it brings tears? It’s Mary Gibbs not like theatre where our emotions are aroused by what we hear, and we cry over words and Condors Fly evolving situations. This is rock… inert… water, air, aromas, silence, light and shadow- Pork Chops play.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Bighorn Sheep Metapopulations in and Near 15
    Restoration of Bighorn Sheep Metapopulations In and Near 15 National Parks: Conservation of a Severely Fragmented Species Volume 1: Planning, Problem Definition, Key Findings, and Restoration Open File Report 99- 102 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey IIUSGS science for a changing world Restoration of Bighorn Sheep Metapopulations In and Near 15 National Parks fills a critical gap in the understanding and solution to restoring a severely fragmented vertebrate to large areas of the western United States. The program described in these pages represents a truly unique interagency and interdisciplinary effort. Many individuals and groups were involved and deserve credit. In particular, major funding was provided by the National Park Service. Science direction and final report preparation was provided by the Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey. EUSGS science for a changing world U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Restoration of Bighorn Sheep Metapopulations In and Near 15 National Parks: Conservation of a Severely Fragmented Species Volume 1: Planning, Problem Definition, Key Findings, and Restoration By Francis J. Singer, U.S. Geological Survey Michelle A. Gudorf, National Park Service Open File Report 99-102 Final Report to the National Park Service Natural Resource Preservation Program Project No. RMRO-N-411.101 A cooperative enterprise by the Intermountain Region of the National Park Service, the Midcontinent Ecological Science Center (Fort Collins, Colorado) of the Biological Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey, the Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory of the Colorado State University (Fort Collins), and the National Park Service coordinators Dr.
    [Show full text]