Narrating and Practising the State Border Between Uganda and Southern Sudan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Narrating and Practising the State Border Between Uganda and Southern Sudan Narrating and practising the state border between Uganda and Southern Sudan Julian Hollstegge ([email protected]) Royal Holloway, University of London (MA Cultural Geography) Introduction This paper focuses on the reconfigurations and dynamics around the state border between Uganda and today's independent Southern Sudan in the pre‐referendum period. The border separates two regions which for much of their colonial and postcolonial history have been politically and economically marginalised within their respective national contexts and have for several decades experienced a considerable amount of conflict and civil war. Within the alleviation of conflict‐related tensions instituted by the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement in Sudan and a new dynamism in cross‐border relations, it takes a look at the state border as both institution and social construct, based on empirical research at a border crossing between Uganda's West Nile and Southern Sudan's Equatoria region1. By looking at border people's everyday practices and narratives and border management performances it seeks to lay bare multiple meanings and the symbolic functions of the border. In doing so, I will first sketch the conceptual and methodological approach, before briefly outlining the historical context of the border. In the main part of this paper, I will present empirical material by linking dominant views and attitudes towards the border ‐ and the other side of it ‐ to the practises of the border management and border people. Border studies and research on African borderlands: Studying border‐related narratives and practices Related to major questions posed in the panel abstract, in here I want to adopt a perspective on the border which focuses on the manyfold ways in which people (and the state, too) attribute meaning, make sense and use of the border. African borders have for long adhered a "consistently poor reputation" , regarded by many border scholars as either severe obstacles to the African continent or as quasi non‐existent in practice (Nugent 1996: 35). Recent work however goes well beyond the clichée of the artificiality of Africa's colonial and postcolonial boundaries, suggesting that there is actually some common ground to suggest that "African border are often now an accepted, even actively reproduced ground of social and economic life for borderlanders" as they use them, exploit them and interpret them in many various ways (Coplan 2010: 2; see also 1 Fieldwork was conducted between December 2009 and February 2010 as part of a Bachelors thesis in Geography at the University of Bayreuth. Ramutsindela 1999; Miles 2005). Particular attention is paid to borderlands as specific functional and social spaces, which are 'typically distant' from the center (Engel&Nugent 2010; Coplan 2010). As regions of strong economic (both formal and informal), ethnic and cultural cross border linkages a major theme in this context are the various opportunities these frontiers offer for people in the borderlands (Nugent and Asiwaju 1996; Egg&Herrera 1998; Pederby 2000; Konings 2005; Feiyissa&Hoehne 2008). In line with the growing amount of work on borders ‐ rather than borderlands ‐ in Africa (Brambilla 2007; Raeymaekers 2009; Doevenspeck 2011; Doevenspeck&Mwanabiningo forthcoming), I intend to study the Sudan/Uganda border as both institution and social construct. In doing so, I will draw on recent conceptual developments of border studies in Political Geography which, informed by notions of borders as discourse and practice (Paasi 1996;1999), foreground the dynamic and processual nature of borders. Rather than fixed and static political dividing lines demarcating sovereign state territories, the border is here understood "a site at and through which socio‐spatial differences are communicated" (Van Houtum 2005: 672). In here, I will therefore focus on the 'small discourses' of border people, their practices and the performative aspects of the border management operating at a 'micro‐level'. In this conception, the border is understood as part of the daily life of borderlanders, where its impact and effects ‐ be they material or symbolic ‐ might be most obviously visible. Following Newman in his suggestion that "[if] we really want to know what borders mean to people, we need to listen to their personal and group narratives, collecting border narratives and pooling together similar views and dominant attitudes towards the border might help revealing its different barrier and interaction functions and lay bare the lines of inclusion and exclusion that they inherit (Newman 2006: 154) In detail, I will look at how those people who live at, work at, deal with, and cross or don't cross the border 'story' their way of seeing and experiencing the border ‐ and the other side of it. In doing so empirically, I conducted 46 interviews with different kinds of individuals from both sides of the border2, ranging from small‐scale and mobile traders, businesspeople, local border residents from different generations, lorry drivers, clearing agents, shop owners, moneychangers and local commuters to border officials. Most of the interviews and less formal conversations were conducted at or in close proximity to the border, sometimes even while crossing it. Spending a considerable amount of time at and in between the border crossing in search for talk on the border and frequently crossing the border back and fourth ‐ whether alone or with borderlanders ‐ were strategies employed to observe, find out and talk about the practices of border crossers, and the performance and constant negotiations of the border management. In order to situate the findings, I will first briefly outline the historical context of the border. Placing the border in context: rebels, refugees and trade 2 In numbers, 17 of my interviewees were Sudanese and 28 came from Uganda, while one allegedly had double citizenship. This imbalance reflects the challenges of gaining access to Southern Sudanese more generally, a fact which may also have impacted on the quality of some of the interview data. Basically agreed upon between the Anglo‐Egyptian Sudan and the British Protectorate of Uganda in 1914, the border and the areas close to it have been of marginal interest to the colonial powers. While the negligibility of the border area in colonial times is in some way be illustrated by the frequent exchange of the 'Lado enclave' (comprising today's West Nile in Uganda and adjacent territories in Congo and Sudan) between the Belgian Congo, the Anglo‐Egyptian Sudan and the Protectorate of Uganda, of which it has been successively part, the marginalisation of the borderlands persisted in the postcolonial period (Leopold 2009). With initial tensions erupting as early as at the dawn Sudan' independence, causing large scale migration from Sudan to Uganda began in the late 50's, and continuing as refugee movements during the first Sudanese Civil War, the borderland has been characterised by persistent conflict with the frequent crossing of rebels, large numbers refugees on either side and large‐scale cross‐border informal trade (Leopold 2009). Shortly after the return of many Sudanese refugees in the 70's, they were soon followed by nearly 80% of West Nile's total population when Ugandan dictator Idi Amin ‐ a West Niler from Koboko ‐ was ousted from power in 1979, and soldiers of former and later president Obote engaged in massive revenge killings, collectively holding guilty West Nilers for Amin's atrocities (Lomo&Hovil 2004). Regrouping under two different rebel movements, former Amin soldiers subsequently launched attacks on Obote's troops from bases in Sudan (Hovil&Okello 2007). Shortly afterwards the outbreak of the second Sudanese Civil War between the SPLA and the Khartoum government again caused major refugee streams into Uganda. Alongside the intense refugee movements across the border also came an increasingly flourishing 'informal' triangular trade between Uganda, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo from the 70s onwards. Commonly refered to as the 'magendo' trade, which goes back to collapse of the Ugandan economy under Idi Amin and persisted during the war years, this trade consisted of "legal goods illegally traded and illegal goods illegally traded" and included goods such as gold, coffee, minerals, diamonds, tropical timbers and petroleum products (Leopold 2009: 473; Meagher 1990). Initially rooted in internal struggles and causing only minor interferences between Khartoum and Kampala governments, conflicts in the borderland became part of wider cross‐border phenomena as both governments started to support rebel groups operating on the other side from the 90's onwards. Besides the Lord's Resistance Army, the Khartoum government helped the less well‐known West Nile Bank Front (WNBF) and the the UNRF II (a reformed rebel group of former Amin soldiers) to form and launch attacks in West Nile, while the Ugandan government backed the SPLA. Having abandoned international relations between 1994 and 1999, Sudan and Uganda "were running an undeclared war on their common border" using the rebel groups as proxies to destablise each other (Prunier 2004: 359). At the border in Kaya, first captured by the SPLA in 1990, government armies started overtly fighting alongside each others enemies. While the Sudan army recaptured Kaya in 1995, the WNBF briefly occupied the border post in Oraba, before in 1997 the SPLA and the Uganda army launched a joint offensive from the border, soon taking over large parts of Sudan's Equatoria
Recommended publications
  • Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko
    Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko Municipal Council Empowering Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work II2 Empowering Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work Foreword This report ‘Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko Municipal Council’ comes in a time when local governments in Uganda are grappling with the effects of refugees who have moved and settled in urban areas. As a country we have been very welcoming to our brothers and sisters who have been seeking refuge and we are proud to say that we have been able to assist the ones in need. Nonetheless, we cannot deny that refugees have been moving out of the gazetted settlements and into the urban areas, which has translated into increasing demands on the limited social amenities and compromises the quality of life for both refugees and host communities, this whilst the number of self-settled refugees continues to grow. This report aims to address the effects the presence self-settled refugees have on urban areas and the shortfalls local governments face in critical service delivery areas like education, health, water, livelihoods and the protection of self-settled refugees if not properly catered for. So far, it has been difficult for the local governments to substantiate such cases in the absence of reliable data. We are therefore very pleased to finally have a reference document, which addresses the unnoticed and yet enormous challenges faced by urban authorities hosting refugees, such as Koboko Municipal Council. This document provides us with more accurate and reliable data, which will better inform our planning, and enhances our capacity to deliver more inclusive services.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Rural Electrification Agency ENERGY FOR RURAL TRANSFORMATION PHASE III GRID INTENSIFICATION SCHEMES PACKAGED UNDER WEST NILE, NORTH NORTH WEST, AND NORTHERN SERVICE TERRITORIES Public Disclosure Authorized JUNE, 2019 i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CDO Community Development Officer CFP Chance Finds Procedure DEO District Environment Officer ESMP Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan ESMF Environmental Social Management Framework ERT III Energy for Rural Transformation (Phase 3) EHS Environmental Health and Safety EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESMMP Environmental and Social Mitigation and Management Plan GPS Global Positioning System GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development NEMA National Environment Management Authority OPD Out Patient Department OSH Occupational Safety and Health PCR Physical Cultural Resources PCU Project Coordination Unit PPE Personal Protective Equipment REA Rural Electrification Agency RoW Right of Way UEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited WENRECO West Nile Rural Electrification Company ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIC of UGANDA Public Disclosure Authorized UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY
    E1879 VOL.3 REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Public Disclosure Authorized UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY FINAL DETAILED ENGINEERING Public Disclosure Authorized DESIGN REPORT CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR UPGRADING TO PAVED (BITUMEN) STANDARD OF VURRA-ARUA-KOBOKO-ORABA ROAD Public Disclosure Authorized VOL IV - ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized The Executive Director Uganda National Roads Authority (UNRA) Plot 11 Yusuf Lule Road P.O.Box AN 7917 P.O.Box 28487 Accra-North Kampala, Uganda Ghana Feasibility Study and Detailed Design ofVurra-Arua-Koboko-Road Environmental Social Impact Assessment Final Detailed Engineering Design Report TABLE OF CONTENTS o EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 0-1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT ROAD........................................................................................ I-I 1.3 NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDy ...................................... 1-3 1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE ESIA STUDY ............................................................................................... 1-3 2 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 INITIAL MEETINGS WITH NEMA AND UNRA............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D.R.C. South Sudan
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only Reference Map Uganda - West Nile Sub-region Production date: 19 October 2017 ² South Sudan Chakulia Angilia D KerÛ wa D E" Afoji Û D ! Metuli E" Menzere Busia D Û Koboko Yumbe District Metu E" District Moyo H¹ Amua Moyo ! ! Metu Midigo Û ! Laufori Lobe Laufori " ! ! E Lima Moyo Dufile Û ! ! ! Elegu Laropi ED" Elegu CP Koka Baringa ! Old Dufile ! ! ! District ! Aoba Rumogi Nimule ! Oraba ! ! Umi OrabaD ! Mocha Û Ludara Lori Û Kuluba CP ! ! ! Palorinya Lire Orijini ! ! Palorinya RC " ! C#" Onigo E Longira Kirila ! E ! Kuluba Û Barakala ! Ogujebe ! Yumbe Bidibidi RC E" Baratuku # C# Elema C# Oliji C Luruno Aranga # NÛ yumanzi ! Nyai ! ! ! Kali ! C Alere II ! C# Media Kuniro Aringa Aringa Poko ! ! C# Nyumanzi TC ! ! E" Lodonga Bidibidi Pachara ! Lomunga Koboko ! ! ! Pagrinya Nori Agojo Adjugopi Yoyo Langi C# Û ! LobuleC#! Lobule ! ! ! ! Zaipi RÛ C2 Padombo Gimara " ! ! ! " Wolo E EÛ Nyangilia Lurujo Odravu Tokaru Dzaipi C# Pagrinya ! ! ! Adjumani ! " Danya Pakelle E Aupi ! O!koyu! Pagrinya RC1 Noko ! C# Ajebe Mirieyi ! Paranga ! Tara ! ! Erezeli ! Oleba Udupi C# Arumva Lugbari C# ! Buramali ! Yivu ! Omugo ! Boroli Ayilo I Kimiru ! ! ! ! ! ! Lewa Û Imvepi ! Simbli Yivu Olua II C# ! Maracha Kubala Utumbari # Delu Obongi ! ! ! ! C ! ! ! ! C# Ayilo II Atiak Kamaka Abiria Imvepi RC E" Ariwa C# Olua I C# Abia Torome Akpokoa ! Obongi Maaji I Michu ! O!vujo ! District Yidu ! Kamaka Moyiga Obuje ! ! ! !Biria Ongoro Otravu Koyi Cilio ! ! ! ! Tondolo ! Adu ! Oluvu # Oluffe Paranga Otrevu Mvepi C Maaji II # Mongula I !
    [Show full text]
  • Arua District Investment Profile
    ARUA DISTRICT INVESTMENT PROFILE Uganda ARUA DISTRICT | Figure 1: Map of Uganda showing the location of Arua District 2 ARUA DISTRICT INVESTMENT PROFILE SNAPSHOT ONARUA Geography Location: West Nile Neighbors: Maracha, Koboko, Yumbe, Adjumani, Nebbi, Zombo District area: 4,274.13 Km2 Arable land area: 3,718.86 Km2 Socio-Economic Characteristics Population (2016 projection): 820,500 Refugees and Asylum seekers (April 211,749 (26%) 2017): Languages: Lugbara, English, Kiswahili, Lingala and Arabic Main Economic Activity: Agriculture Major tradeables: Cassava, Sweet Potatoes and Plantain Market target: 71 million, including DRC and South Sudan Infrastructure and strategic positioning Transport network: Arua Airport; (road network) Communication: MTN, Airtel, Africel, UTL, the internet GEOGRAPHY  Arua district lies in the  In total the district covers an North-Western Corner of Ugan- area of 4,274.13Km2, of which da. It is bordered by Maracha about 87% is arable. It is located district in the North West; Yum- 520 km from Kampala and only be in the North East; Democratic 80 km from the South Sudan Republic of Congo in the West; Border. Nebbi in the South; Zombo in the South East; and Amuru district in the East. ARUA DISTRICT INVESTMENT PROFILE 3 DEMOGRAPHY  Arua town is very busy and cos-  The refugees, mainly from South mopolitan, with major languag- Sudan are of diverse ethnic es: English, Kiswahili, Lingala backgrounds; Dinkas, Kuku, Nuer, and Arabic and many local Kakwa, Madi, and Siluk and have dialects widely spoken, and mul- close ethnicity with the locals tiple cultures freely celebrated. who are Kakwa, Madi, Alur and This demonstrates the unique Lugbara.
    [Show full text]
  • RSS Final Report
    TRADE MARK EAST AFRICA Study on Establishment of Roadside Stations (RSSs) along the Northern Corridor TMEA/PO/20120301 . July 2014 Final Report – 2nd Volume Grupo TYPSA Balbino Marron 3, Edificio Viapol A/1/4&5 41018 Seville, Spain Tel.: (34) 954 925 325 - Fax: (34) 954 640 359 www.typsa.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 3 2. RESULTS OF THE SURVEYING FACILITIES ALONG THE NORTHERN CORRIDOR 13 3. APPROVED ROADSIDE STATIONS ............................................................................. 120 4. BASIC INFORMATION FOR THE DIMENSIONING OF PRE-SELECTED ROADSIDE STATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 159 5. RESULTS OF THE RSS MODEL DESIGN .................................................................... 181 ANNEX 1: STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION ANNEX 2: GRAPHICS OF RESULTS OF THE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR ALL THE ROADSIDE STATIONS ANNEX 3: ToRs Study on Establishment of Roadside Stations (RSSs) along the Northern Corridor First Interim Report 2 1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK We have focused on two key aspects: the strategic and environmental framework and the border regulations. The main characteristics of these frameworks are as follows. Strategic and environmental legal framework Uganda The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 In Uganda all pieces of legislation that govern environmental protection and conservation are derived from statutes
    [Show full text]
  • Arua District Profile
    ARUA DISTRICT Investment Profile MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ARUA DISTRICT ACCESSIBILITY MAIN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY Agriculture Hospitality Cottage Industry Manufacturing Trade Transport [Road and Air] BRIEF DISTRICT PROFILE Geography Location West Nile Subregion Neighbours Maracha, Koboko, Yumbe, Adjumani, Nebbi, Madi-okollo District area 4,274.13 km² Arable land area 3,718.86 km² Socio-economic characteristics Population (estimate as of 2019) 820,500 Languages Lugbara, English, Kiswahili, Lingala, Arabic, Luganda, Kakwa, Madi, French and Alur Main economic activity Agriculture, hospitality, trade, cottage industry, manufactur- ing, transport industry (road and air) Major tradeable commodities Sorghum, simsim, cassava, soya beans, groundnuts, honey, fish, mangoes, oranges, avocado and tobacco Infrastructure and strategic positioning Transport network Road: There is a tarmac road connecting the two international borders in the vicinity i.e. Vurra Customs (Democratic Republic of Congo) to Oraba Customs (South Sudan) Air: Three domestic flights per day Telecommunication network MTN, Airtel, Africel, UTL, internet PHOTO CREDIT: https://www.westnileweb.com Geography Demography • Arua District is in North - western Uganda • Arua is a provincial town where English, bordered by Maracha District in the Lugbara, Kiswahili, French, Arabic and north-west, Yumbe District in the north- many local dialects are widely spoken east, the Democratic Republic of Congo with a diverse range of cultures freely in the west, Nebbi in the south, Zombo in celebrated. the south-east and Amuru District in the • The district hosts a population of east. 820,500. In 2016, the refugee population 2 • Arua District covers a total of 4,274.13km was at approximately 36,731 (4.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • Annexe 2 SMALL ARMS PROLIFERATION RESEARCH IN
    Annexe 2 SMALL ARMS PROLIFERATION RESEARCH IN THE BORDER AREAS OF UGANDA A CASE STUDY OF WEST NILE DISTRICTS OF ARUA YUMBE, MOYO AND NEBBI BY CEFORD NOVEMBER / DECEMBER 2002 34 ACRONYMS. AAH Action Africa Haile ADEO Africa Development Emergency Organisation ACORD Agency for Cooperation and Research in Development AK47 Alexander Kalasnoskov 47 assault riffle BAT British American Tobacco BISO Border internal security organization CEFORD Community empowerment for rural development CoU Church of Uganda CP central police DISO District internal security orgnization DPC District police commander DRC Democratic republic of Congo GISO Gombolola internal security organisation H/Q Headquarter IO Intelligence Officer LAP Local administrative police LC Local council LDU Local defence unit LMG Light machine gun LRA Lords Resistance Army Lt Lieutenant NGO Non Governmental organization NRA National resistance army OC Officer in charge PPU Presidential Protection Unit RDC Resident district commissioner Rtd Retired S/C Sub county SISO Sector Internal Security Officer SMG Sub machine gun SPC Special police constable SPLA\M Sudan people’s liberation army/movement SSI Semi structured interview T.C Trading center/Town council TPDF Tanzanian People’s Defence Forces UCB Uganda Commercial Bank UNLA Uganda national Liberation army UNRF Uganda national rescue front UPDF Uganda people defence force URA Uganda revenue authority WNBF West Nile Bank Front 35 1.0 INTRODUCTION. Possession and use of small arms by unauthorized and undisciplined persons have been identified as the main source of insecurity in West Nile region. The small arms have also been linked to rising crimes; armed robberies, and poaching of wild life in the National parks and game reserves within and those bordering the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Austrian Pilgrims Captivate Christians in Arua Diocese
    July/August 2015 Published by the Communications Department and printed by the Arua Diocese Printing Services, P.O. Box 454, Arua No. 138 Austrian pilgrims captivate Christians in Arua Diocese By Sr. Grace Candiru, MSMMC unday 12th, July 2015 wit- nessed a vibrant celebration S of the Holy Mass at Ediofe Cathedral jointly animated by an all- Boys’ Choir from Austria and St Daniel Comboni of Ediofe cathedral. The holy mass which was led by Ab- bot Thomas Renner of Altenburg Monastery and co-celebrated by Bishop Sabino Ocan Odoki of Arua Diocese and several other priests attracted hundreds of Christians as the two choirs took turns in leading the hymns for the Mass. The end of each hymn by the visiting choir was met with ululations and hand claps from the congregation. And when it came to the time of the “Our Father”, the Austrian choir shocked the mammoth congrega- tion, by intoning the hymn in the L-R: Bishop Sabino Ocan Odoki, a member of the Boys’ Choir and Abbot Thomas Renner local Lögbara dialect, which they during a luncheon hosted in honour of the Austrian pilgrims at the Bishop’s Residence. composed. As the choir sung the hymn, many in and his monks lived. According to Abbot Thomas, the choir, their patron/matron and par- the congregation could not contain To date, the monks are still involved ents on annual basis, make pilgrim- themselves and not surprisingly, the in pastoral care of eight parishes. end of the hymn was met with a thun- Some of the monks are teachers while age to various countries and, “this has led us to your beautiful country, derous hand clap and ululations from most of them work in agriculture, for- Uganda.” “It was our relationship the congregation.
    [Show full text]
  • The —Uganda Gazette X
    165 The TM UnKk lVlVK^A —Uganda Gazette x Vol. XCVII No. 26 28th May, 2004 Price: Shs. 1000 CONTENTS Page General Notice No. 182 of 2004. The Electoral Commission—Notices ................. 165-166 THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS ACT, 2001. The Companies Act—Notices................................... 166 Act No. 8 of 2001. The Trade Marks Act— Registration of applications 166-169 , Section 29(1 )(a) Advertisements ........................................................... 169-170 NOTICE D;„ SUPPLEMENTS PUBLICATION OF POLLING STATIONS FOR THE PARLIAMENTARY BY-ELECTION IN KOBOKO No.10—The International Criminal Court Bill, 2004. COUNTY, ARUA DISTRICT Notice is hereby given by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 29(1 )(a) of the Parliamentary General Notice No. 180 of 2004. Elections Act No. 8 of 2001, that the list of polling stations THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION ACT, 1997. in the Schedule to this Notice is hereby published for Act No. 3 of 1997 purposes of the Parliamentary by-election in Koboko Section 25( 1) County, Arua District. Cap. (240) LIST OF POLLING STATIONS NOTICE 02 ARUA DISTRICT APPOINTMENT OF DISPLAY PERIOD FOR THE 008 KOBOKO COUNTY 01 KOBOKO TOWN COUNCIL PARLIAMENTARY BY-ELECTION IN KOBOKO Parish COUNTY, ARUA DISTRICT Polling Station 25 APAWARD 01 GBUKUTU SUB WARD A NonCE is hereby given by the Electoral Commission in 02 GBUKUTU SUBWARD B accordance with section 25(1) of the Electoral Commission Act No. 3 of 1997, that the period commencing I Oth June, 2004 and 28 MALENGA 01 MALENGA B ending 1st July, 2004, is hereby appointed display period of 02 MALENGA A copies of the Voters’ Register in all the polling stations in 03 ABELE ■Koboko County, Arua District from 8:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Uganda Data Collection Survey on Social Infrastructure Needs of Refugee-Hosting Communities in Northern Uganda
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA DATA COLLECTION SURVEY ON SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OF REFUGEE-HOSTING COMMUNITIES IN NORTHERN UGANDA FINAL REPORT JULY 2018 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) KATAHIRA & Engineers International PADECO Co., Ltd. EI KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. JR 18-068 Data Collection Survey on Social Infrastructure Needs of Refugee-Hosting Communities in Northern Uganda Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF PHOTOS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS STUDY PHOTOS CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND OUTLINE OF THE STUDY ............................................ 1-1 1.1 Background of the Study ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Study .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Target Areas ........................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Relevant Ministries, Departments and Agencies to the Study ............................................... 1-2 1.5 Timeline of the Study ............................................................................................................ 1-2 CHAPTER 2 STUDY APPROACH, METHODOLOGY & PLAN ............................................. 2-1 2.1 Approach of the Study ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Alignment
    [Show full text]