DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 12.3 Field Survey Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System Environmental Impact Assessment Report Appendix 12.3 Field Survey Results Field Survey Results 1 Field Survey Schedule 1.1.1 A summary of the survey dates for various types of terrestrial ecological surveys is presented in Table 1 below. Table 1: Terrestrial ecological field surveys schedule 2012 2013 Survey Wet Season Dry Season Wet Season Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Habitat - - - - - 8 4, 21 8, 30 10, 3 - 16, 3 Mapping and 15 23 Flora Survey Avifauna 22, 22, 13, 11, 14, 21, 12 2*, 9, 6, 22 19, 10, 8, 21 - Survey – 29 30 26 17 29 26 22 24 24 Boat Survey NE 24, 16, 20, 5, 13 11, 4, 19 8, 21 11, 9, 15 10, 12, 2, 26 - 25 24 28 22 25 21 22 - N 25, 19, 14, 12, 9, 21 6, 25 5, 18 3, 16 2, 13, 6, 13 19, 22, - Land 26 29 26, 19 31 29 28 – 28 W 20, 18, 14, 14, 16, 15, 1, 25 18, 3*, 6, 26 3, 23 9, 19 - 27 25 30 27 25 20 19 27, 29 SC 27, 17, 27 11*, 7, 18 6, 18 7, 21 8, 24 20, 17, 19, 12, - 28 26 27, 23 27 29 28 based Survey based Avifauna Survey Survey Avifauna 28 Egretry - - - - - - - 24 23 17 19 - - Survey Avifauna - - - - 29 8 21 - 10, 3 10, 6, 27 - Transect 23 19 Survey Verification - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - Survey for Birds at Existing Runway Herpetofauna - - - - - - - - 10, 3 10, 6, 27 - Survey 23 19 Macroinverte - - - - 29 8 21 - 10, 3 10 6 - brate Survey 23 Stream/estua - - - - - - 8, 9, - 8, 13, 1, 29, 3, 4, 6, 8, - rine Fauna 12, 17, 30 8, 9, 9, 10 Survey 13, 18, 17, 23, 23, 24, 24, 26, 29, 29, 30 30 Notes: *Additional survey to catch up the survey scheduled in the month before which has been cancelled due to adverse weather. 308875/ENL/ENL/03/07/C March 2014 P:\Hong Kong\ENL\PROJECTS\308875 3rd runway\03 Deliverables\07 Final EIA Report\Appendices\Ch 12 Terrestrial Ecology\Appendix 12.3 Field Survey Result.doc 1 Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System Environmental Impact Assessment Report 2 Habitat Mapping and Flora Survey 2.1 Habitat Type and Vegetation within the Study Area 2.1.1 There are 10 major terrestrial habitats identified in the study area. Secondary Woodland Plantation Woodland Tall Shrubland Shrubby Grassland Seasonally Wet Grassland Cultivated Land Stream and Riparian Salt Marsh Wasteland Developed Area 2.1.2 There were also four major coastal habitats identified in the study area. Terrestrial fauna recorded within these coastal habitats are presented in Chapter 12. However, floral and seashore fauna recorded within these habitats are discussed and assessed in detail in Chapter 13. The four coastal habitats included: Mangrove and intertidal mudflat Sandy Shore Rocky Shore Artificial Seawall 2.1.3 The distribution of habitats is shown in the habitat map in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/12-001 to MCL/P132/EIA/12-007. The areas of each habitat type within the study area are listed in Table 2. Table 2: Habitats within the study area Habitat Area (ha) Location A Location B Location C Location D Sub-total % of Total study area Secondary Woodland 248.2 51.0 4.3 4.5 308.0 13.9 % 308875/ENL/ENL/03/07/C March 2014 P:\Hong Kong\ENL\PROJECTS\308875 3rd runway\03 Deliverables\07 Final EIA Report\Appendices\Ch 12 Terrestrial Ecology\Appendix 12.3 Field Survey Result.doc 2 Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System Environmental Impact Assessment Report Habitat Area (ha) Location A Location B Location C Location D Sub-total % of Total study area Plantation Woodland 13.6 6.9 2.2 - 22.7 1.0 % Tall Shrubland 82.4 13.6 1.0 43.6 140.6 6.4 % Shrubby Grassland 124.0 111.5 11.5 - 247.0 11.1 % Seasonally Wet Grassland 1.3 1.4 - - 2.7 0.1 % Cultivated Land 15.4 16.1 - - 31.5 1.4 % Stream and Riparian 2.4 2.4 - - 4.8 0.2 % Salt Marsh 0.5 0.7 - - 1.2 0.1 % Wasteland 5.2 2.0 - - 7.2 0.3 % Developed Area 94.4 115.6 1,237.7 0.6 1,448.3 65.4 % Total 587.4 321.2 1,256.7 48.7 2,214.0 100.0 % 2.1.4 Representative photographs of each habitat type are illustrated in Plates 1 to 29 in Annex A. 2.2 Secondary Woodland 2.2.1 Within Location A, secondary woodland was mainly found on hill slopes near the North Lantau coastline from Sham Wat to Tung Chung except Sha Lo Wan and Hau Hok Wan. The canopy of secondary woodland consisted mostly of semi-mature trees. This habitat supported a high floristic diversity in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layers. A total of 273 floral species have been recorded in this habitat in Location A. Dominant tree species observed included Celtis sinensis, Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Litsea glutinosa, Mallotus paniculatus, Schefflera heptaphylla and Sterculia lanceolata. Dominant shrub species include Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia, Psychotria asiatica, Rhaphiolepis indica and Rhodomyrtus tomentosa. Floral species of conservation interest recorded included Chinese Antirhea Antirhea chinensis, Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis, Cansjera rheedii, Biond’s Hackberry Celtis biondii, Lamb of Tartary Cibotium barometz, Small Persimmon Diospyros vaccinioides, Little-leaved Rourea Gmelina chinensis, Night Blooming Cereus Hylocereus undatus, Hong Kong Pavetta Pavetta hongkongensis and Spiny-fruited Uvaria Uvaria calamistrata. 2.2.2 Within Location B, secondary woodland was mainly found in small patches near Pak Mong and Tai Ho. The canopy of secondary woodland consisted mostly of semi-mature trees. This habitat supported a high floristic diversity in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layers. A total of 269 floral species have been recorded in this habitat in Location B. Dominant tree species observed included Celtis sinensis, Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Litsea glutinosa, Mallotus paniculatus, Schefflera heptaphylla and Sterculia lanceolata. Dominant shrub species include Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia, Psychotria asiatica, Rhaphiolepis indica and Rhodomyrtus tomentosa. Floral species of conservation interest recorded included Chinese Antirhea Antirhea chinensis, Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis, Silver-back Artocarpus Artocarpus hypargyreus, Cansjera rheedii, Biond’s Hackberry Celtis biondii, Lamb of Tartary Cibotium barometz, Small Persimmon Diospyros vaccinioides, Little-leaved Rourea Gmelina chinensis, Night Blooming Cereus Hylocereus undatus, Pitcher Plant Nepenthes mirabilis and Hong Kong Pavetta Pavetta hongkongensis. 2.2.3 Within Location C, secondary woodland was found on the north-facing slope of Scenic Hill. The canopy of secondary woodland consists mostly of semi-mature trees. This habitat supported a 308875/ENL/ENL/03/07/C March 2014 P:\Hong Kong\ENL\PROJECTS\308875 3rd runway\03 Deliverables\07 Final EIA Report\Appendices\Ch 12 Terrestrial Ecology\Appendix 12.3 Field Survey Result.doc 3 Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System Environmental Impact Assessment Report medium floristic diversity in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layers. A total of 134 floral species have been recorded in this habitat in Location C. Dominant tree species observed included Celtis sinensis, Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Litsea glutinosa, Mallotus paniculatus, Schefflera heptaphylla and Sterculia lanceolata. Dominant shrub species included Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia, Psychotria asiatica and Scolopia saeva. Floral species of conservation interest recorded include Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis and Cansjera rheedii. 2.2.4 Within Location D, isolated patches of secondary woodland were found close to the coast line on Lung Kwu Chau and Cha Chau, on the east-facing slope of Sha Chau and behind the temple on the northern tip of Sha Chau. The canopy of secondary woodland consisted mostly of semi- mature trees. This habitat supported a low to moderate floristic diversity in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layers. A total of 58 floral species have been recorded in this habitat in Location D. Dominant tree species observed include Casuarina equisetifolia, Ficus microcarpa, Schefflera heptaphylla and Sterculia lanceolata. Dominant shrub species include Atalantia buxifolia, Daphniphyllum calycinum and Scolopia chinensis. Floral species of conservation interest recorded included Cansjera rheedii. 2.3 Plantation Woodland 2.3.1 Within Location A, plantation woodland was mainly found on North Lantau hill slopes near Sha Lo Wan, Hau Hok Wan and San Tau. It was mostly dominated by semi-mature native and exotic trees of similar age and size. A total of 150 floral species have been recorded in this habitat in Location A. Dominant tree species observed included Acacia confusa, Casuarina equisetifolia, Celtis sinensis, Litsea glutinosa and Mallotus paniculatus. Dominant shrub species include Bidens alba and Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia. Floral species of conservation interest recorded included Chinese Antirhea Antirhea chinensis and Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis. 2.3.2 Within Location B, plantation woodland was mainly found on North Lantau hill slopes along North Lantau Expressway and near village settlement in Pak Mong. The woodland behind Pak Mong is known to have fung shui significance, but has been heavily modified (AECOM, 2009) and therefore grouped under this habitat type. The woodland along North Lantau Expressway is young to semi-mature plantation composed of mainly landscape trees. This habitat was mostly dominated by semi-mature native and exotic trees. A total of 105 floral species have been recorded in this habitat in Location B. Dominant tree species observed included Acacia confusa, Aporusa dioica, Celtis sinensis, Litsea glutinosa, Mallotus paniculatus and Pinus massoniana. Dominant shrub species include Bridelia tomentosa and Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia. Floral species of conservation interest recorded included Chinese Antirhea Antirhea chinensis and Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis.
Recommended publications
  • Original Research Article DOI - 10.26479/2017.0206.01 BIOLOGY of FEW BUTTERFLY SPECIES of AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS of ARID REGIONS of KARNATAKA, INDIA Santhosh S

    Original Research Article DOI - 10.26479/2017.0206.01 BIOLOGY of FEW BUTTERFLY SPECIES of AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS of ARID REGIONS of KARNATAKA, INDIA Santhosh S

    Santhosh & Basavarajappa RJLBPCS 2017 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications Original Research Article DOI - 10.26479/2017.0206.01 BIOLOGY OF FEW BUTTERFLY SPECIES OF AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS OF ARID REGIONS OF KARNATAKA, INDIA Santhosh S. & S. Basavarajappa* Entomology Laboratory, DOS in Zoology, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore-570 006, India ABSTRACT: Agriculture ecosystems have provided congenial habitat for various butterfly species. The Papilionidae and Nymphalidae family member’s most of their life cycle is depended on natural plant communities amidst agriculture ecosystems. To record few butterflies viz., Papilio polytes, Graphium agamemnon, Ariadne merione and Junonia hierta, agriculture ecosystems were selected randomly and visited frequently by adapting five-hundred-meter length line transects during 2014 to 2016. Study sites were visited during 0800 to 1700 hours and recorded the ovipositing behaviour of gravid female of these butterfly species by following standard methods. Eggs along with the host plant leaves / shoot / twigs were collected in a sterilized Petri dish and brought to the laboratory for further studies. Eggs were maintained under sterilized laboratory conditions till hatching. Newly hatched larvae were fed with their preferred host plants foliage and reared by following standard methods. P. polytes and G. agamemnon and A. merione and J. hierta developmental stages included egg, larva, pupa and adult and these stages have showed significant variation (F=21.35; P>0.01). Further, all the four species had four moults and five instars in their larval stage. However, including larval period, pupal duration was also varied considerably among these species. Further, overall life cycle completed in 43, 32.5 to 40, 21 to 30 and 21 to 29 days by P.
  • Dragonfly News 66

    Dragonfly News 66

    Dragonfly News 66 The Magazine of the British Dragonfly Society Autumn 2014 www.british-dragonflies.org.uk Meet the new BDS Chairman, How many Willow Emeralds are David Chelmick ovipositing? Dragonfly hunting....in Sweden? Andy Holt’s unique larval portraits How tatty can a dragonfly be and still fly? Dragonfly News 66 The Magazine of the British Dragonfly Society Published twice a year, in April and October, Dragonfly News covers all aspects of the British Dragonfly Society’s field, recording, monitoring, research, conservation and social activities, as well as information from the wider dragonfly, natural history and conservation world. The emphasis is on dragonflies recorded in the UK. The British Dragonfly Society aims to promote and encourage the study, conservation and understanding of dragonflies and their natural habitats, especially in the UK, and to raise public awareness of dragonflies. Dragonfly News is edited & designed by: Trustees & Officers of the BDS Mark Tyrrell, 8 Warwick Close, Raunds, Chairman: David Chelmick Northants., NN9 6JH Tel. Vice-Chairman: Vacant e-mail: Secretary: Henry Curry, 23 Bowker Way, Whittlesey, Peterborough, PE7 1PY. Tel. Deadlines for inclusion of copy: Spring 31 January Treasurer: Brian Walker, 49 Roman Way, Wantage, Autumn 31 July Oxfordshire, OX12 9YF. Tel. Advertising Rates: Trustees: David Goddard, Stuart Irons, Mick Parfitt. £15 for small-ad (text only); £40 for quarter- Journal Editor: Peter Mill, 8 Cookridge Grove, LEEDS, page; £60 for half-page; £100 for full-page. LS16 7LH. Shop Manager: Lynn Curry, 23 Bowker Way, Whittlesey, Peterborough, PE7 1PY Tel. © British Dragonfly Society 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any Dragonfly Conservation Group (DCG) form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, Convenor: Dave Smallshire, 8, Twindle Beer, Chudleigh, Newton recording or otherwise, without the permission of the British Abbot, Devon, TQ13 0JP.
  • Research Article

    Research Article

    South Asian Journal of Life Sciences Research Article Eco Biology and Life Cycle of the Pea Blue Butterfly, Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera: Lycaenidae) from Southern Andhra Pradesh, India HARINATH PALEM, SURYANARAYANA KANIKE, VENKATA RAMANA SRI PURUSHOTTAM* Department of Zoology, Yogi Vemana University, Y. S. R Kadapa District- 51600, Andhra Pradesh, India. Abstract | Life history of the long tailed blue butterfly also called pea blue, Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus) with respect to larval stages, diet consumption, exploitation and the length of lifae phase was designed to perform. The study was conducted between January to December 2014 at Yogi Vemana University Campus (78°42’46.429’ E, 14°28’10.542’ N) and Campus Botanical garden (78°42’44.539’ E, 14°28’25.59’ N), Kadapa, India. Lampides boeticus completes its life cycle in 15-22 days (Eggs 2-3 days, Larvae: 8-12days, Pre-Pupa:2-3days, Pupa: 3-4 days). The standards of food indices across the instars include Approximate Digestibility (AD): 90 – 96.07%; Growth Rate (GR): 0.51 - 0.64, Con- sumption index (CI): 11.54 - 5.95, Efficiency of Conversion of Digested food (FCD): 03.98 – 11.25%; Efficiency of Conversion of Ingested food (ECD): 03.85 – 10.80% as measured in the research laboratory. The relatively high values of ECD and ECI partially explain the ecological success of this butterfly in the present study enviroment. Keywords | Life history, Lampides boeticus, Vigna trilobata (L.), Food indices, Yogi Vemana University Campus, Soth- ern Andhra Pradesh Editor | Muhammad Nauman Zahid, Quality Operations Laboratory, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Pests in Northwestern Washington Prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS Survey of Apple Trees to Identify All Leaf-Feeding Apple Pests Currently in Whatcom County

    Pests in Northwestern Washington Prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS Survey of Apple Trees to Identify All Leaf-Feeding Apple Pests Currently in Whatcom County

    6. Biology / Phenology a. Biology 1. Exotic Fruit Tree Pests in Whatcom County, Washington Eric LaGasa Plant Services Div., Wash. St. Dept. of Agriculture P.O. Box 42560, Olympia, Washington 98504-2560 (360) 902-2063 [email protected] The Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) has conducted detection surveys and other field projects for exotic pests since the mid-1980's, with funding provided by the USDA/ APHIS Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) program. Recent discovery of several exotic fruit tree pests in northwestern Washington prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS survey of apple trees to identify all leaf-feeding apple pests currently in Whatcom County. Additional exotic apple pest species, new to either the region or U.S. were discovered. This paper presents some brief descriptions of species detected in that project, and other exotic fruit tree pest species discovered in northwest Washington since 1985. Table 1. - Exotic Fruit Tree Pests New to Northwestern Washington State - 1985 to 1995 green pug moth - Geometridae: Chloroclystis rectangulata (L.) An early, persistent European pest of apple, pear, cherry and other fruit trees. Larvae attack buds, blossoms, and leaves from March to June. Damage to blossoms causes considerable deformation of fruit. Larvae are common in apple blossoms in Whatcom County, where it was first reared from apple trees in 1994. This pest, new to North America, was also recently detected in the northeastern U.S. Croesia holmiana - Tortricidae: Croesia holmiana (L.) A common pest of many fruit trees and ornamental plants in Europe and Asia, where it is considered a minor problem. Spring larval feeding affects only leaves.
  • Kerala State Biodiversity Board

    Kerala State Biodiversity Board

    1 2 biodiversity FOR CLIMate RESILIENCE Editors Dr. S.C. Joshi IFS (Rtd.) Dr. V. Balakrishnan Dr. Preetha N. KERALA STATE BIODIVERSITY BOARD 3 Biodiversity for Climate Resilience [This book is a compilation of the papers presented as part of the 1st Kerala State Biodiversity Congress held during 2018] Editors Dr. S.C. Joshi IFS, Dr. V. Balakrishnan, Dr. Preetha N. Editorial Board Dr. K. Satheeshkumar Sri. K.V. Govindan Dr. K.T. Chandramohanan Dr. T.S. Swapna Sri. A.K. Dharni IFS © Kerala State Biodiversity Board 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, tramsmitted in any form or by any means graphics, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, without the prior writted permissionof the publisher. Published By Member Secretary Kerala State Biodiversity Board ISBN: 978-81-934231-2-7 Citation: In. Joshi, S.C., Balakrishnan, V. and Preetha, N. (Eds.), Biodiversity for Climate Resilience. Kerala State Biodiversity Board, Thiruvananthapuram. 4 5 CONTENTS Best Practices of Biodiversity conservation 1. People’s action for Rejuvenating lost waterbodies - The Aadi Pamba Varattar Story - 5 2. Jalasamrudhi – A Modal Initiative on Water Conservation -12 3. Best Practices in Biodiversity Conservation: A Case of M. S. Swaminathan Botanic Garden in Wayanad, Kerala -17 4. Yaongyimchen Community Bio-Diversity Conservation Area , Nagaland - 29 5. Hornbill Monitoring to Ecological Monitoring – One and Half decade of Indigenous community Based Conservation and Monitoring of Endangered Rainforest Species and Habitat in Western Ghats -35 6. Best Practices in Agrobiodiversity Conservation for Climate Resilience - 41 7. Best Practices on Biodiversity Conservation in Rice Ecosystems of Kerala - 46 Biodiversity Conservation Priorities 8.
  • A Study on Butterfly Diversity of East and West Godavari Districts, Andhra Pradesh: an Appraisal for Their Conservation

    A Study on Butterfly Diversity of East and West Godavari Districts, Andhra Pradesh: an Appraisal for Their Conservation

    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(2): 3229-3235 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 2 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.364 A Study on Butterfly Diversity of East and West Godavari Districts, Andhra Pradesh: An Appraisal for their Conservation B. Mounica* and Milu Mathew Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage, Central Integrated Pest Management Centre, Vijayawada, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT A study on butterfly diversity was carried out in East and West Godavari districts K e yw or ds of Andhra Pradesh, India. Eight sites were selected, four in each district and survey was carried out, reporting 40 species of butterflies of five families. It was Butterfly, diversity, East Godavari, observed from the recorded 40 species, majority of species were from West Godavari, Nymphalidae family (17) followed by Pieridae (11), Papilionidae (6) and less conservation number of species were recorded in both Lycaenidae and Hesperiidae with three Article Info species each. Among the species of butterflies observed in study area 17 species were common, 14 species were occasional and 9 were rare species. The study area Accepted: 05 January 2020 is rich in butterfly diversity and further research could be conducted to obtain Available Online: more details and documentation of butterfly diversity for appraising a 10 February 2020 comprehensive conservation strategy. Introduction on their wings, they enhance the earth’s beauty incontestably and add immense The flora and fauna that form today’s aesthetic value to the ambient environment.
  • MOTH CHECKLIST Species Listed Are Those Recorded on the Wetland to Date

    MOTH CHECKLIST Species Listed Are Those Recorded on the Wetland to Date

    Version 4.0 Nov 2015 Map Ref: SO 95086 46541 MOTH CHECKLIST Species listed are those recorded on the Wetland to date. Vernacular Name Scientific Name New Code B&F No. MACRO MOTHS 3.005 14 Ghost Moth Hepialus humulae 3.001 15 Orange Swift Hepialus sylvina 3.002 17 Common Swift Hepialus lupulinus 50.002 161 Leopard Moth Zeuzera pyrina 54.008 169 Six-spot Burnet Zygaeba filipendulae 66.007 1637 Oak Eggar Lasiocampa quercus 66.010 1640 The Drinker Euthrix potatoria 68.001 1643 Emperor Moth Saturnia pavonia 65.002 1646 Oak Hook-tip Drepana binaria 65.005 1648 Pebble Hook-tip Drepana falcataria 65.007 1651 Chinese Character Cilix glaucata 65.009 1653 Buff Arches Habrosyne pyritoides 65.010 1654 Figure of Eighty Tethia ocularis 65.015 1660 Frosted Green Polyploca ridens 70.305 1669 Common Emerald Hermithea aestivaria 70.302 1673 Small Emerald Hemistola chrysoprasaria 70.029 1682 Blood-vein Timandra comae 70.024 1690 Small Blood-vein Scopula imitaria 70.013 1702 Small Fan-footed Wave Idaea biselata 70.011 1708 Single-dotted Wave Idaea dimidiata 70.016 1713 Riband Wave Idaea aversata 70.053 1722 Flame Carpet Xanthorhoe designata 70.051 1724 Red Twin-spot Carpet Xanthorhoe spadicearia 70.049 1728 Garden Carpet Xanthorhoe fluctuata 70.061 1738 Common Carpet Epirrhoe alternata 70.059 1742 Yellow Shell Camptogramma bilineata 70.087 1752 Purple Bar Cosmorhoe ocellata 70.093 1758 Barred Straw Eulithis (Gandaritis) pyraliata 70.097 1764 Common Marbled Carpet Chloroclysta truncata 70.085 1765 Barred Yellow Cidaria fulvata 70.100 1776 Green Carpet Colostygia pectinataria 70.126 1781 Small Waved Umber Horisme vitalbata 70.107 1795 November/Autumnal Moth agg Epirrita dilutata agg.
  • Journal of Threatened Taxa

    Journal of Threatened Taxa

    The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Short Communication Diversity pattern of butterfly communities (Lepidoptera) in different habitat types of Nahan, Himachal Pradesh, India Suveena Thakur, Suneet Bahrdwaj & Amar Paul Singh 26 July 2021 | Vol. 13 | No. 8 | Pages: 19137–19143 DOI: 10.11609/jot.7095.13.8.19137-19143 For Focus, Scope, Aims, and Policies, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/aims_scope For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/policies_various For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher & Host ners are not responsible
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Table of Contents 0.9.06 Stage-6 40 0.1.1 Publication data 3 0.9.07 Stage-7 40 0.1.2 Table of Contents 13 0.9.08 Stage-8 40 0.1.3 Word of thanks 14 0.9.09 Stage-9 41 0.1.4 Foreword Klein 14 0.9.10 Stage-10 41 0.1.5 Foreword Kuiper 15 0.9.11 Stage-11 41 0.1.6 Introduction 16 0.9.12 Stage-12 42 0.1.7 Introduction use 16 0.9.13 Stage-13 42 0.1.8 Use 17 0.9.14 Stage-14 42 0.2 Goal 18 0.9.15 Stage-15 43 0.3.1 Method 19 0.9.16 Stage-16 43 0.3.2 Element Theory 19 0.9.17 Stage-17 43 0.3.3 Classification of Plants 20 0.9.18 Stage-18 44 0.3.4 Classes 20 000.00 Evolution 44 0.4 Result 21 000.00.00 Kingdom 45 0.4.0 Result 21 000.00.00 Plant Kingdom 47 0.4.1 Phyla and Series 21 000.00.20 Kingdom 49 0.4.2 Classes and Series 22 111.00.00 Archaeoplastidae 51 0.4.3 Subclasses and Series 22 111.02.20 Fucus vesiculosus 51 0.4.4 Orders and Phases 23 111.10.00 Rhodophyta 51 0.4.5 Families and Subphases 23 111.10.13 Helminthochortos 51 0.4.7 Number 23 111.10.20 Chondrus crispus 51 0.5 Discussion 24 111.10.20 Porphyra yezoensis 51 0.5.0 Discussion 24 112.20.00 Glaucophyta 51 0.5.1 Discussion Apg 3 24 210.00.00 Chlorophyta 51 0.5.1 Discussion Apg 3 24 210.01.01 Cladophora rupestris 51 0.5.2 Divergence with Apg3 25 211.00.00 Viridiplantae 53 0.5.3 Discussion Phases 25 220.00.00 Charophyta 54 0.5.4 Discussion Sources 25 221.21.00 Characeae 54 0.5.5 Provings 26 221.21.04 Chara intermedia 55 0.5.6 Discussion Cases 26 300.00.00 Bryophyta 56 0.5.7 Discussion Complexity 27 311.10.00 Anthocerotophyta 57 0.6.1 Presentation 28 322.10.00 Marchantiophyta 57 0.6.2 Central
  • Dragonflies of La Brenne & Vienne

    Dragonflies of La Brenne & Vienne

    Dragonflies of La Brenne & Vienne Naturetrek Tour Report 22 - 29 June 2011 Yellow-spotted Emerald, Somatochlora flavomaculata Report and image compiled by Nick Ransdale Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Dragonflies of La Brenne & Vienne Tour leader: Nick Ransdale Participants: Vaughan Patterson Hilary Lawton Chris Benson Margaret Clayton Terry Clayton Summary This two-centre holiday in central-western France gave us an excellent insight into both the dragonfly fauna and abundant butterflies, birds and other wildlife of the region. After spending the first two days in the Vienne, we visited the myriad ponds of the Pinail Nature Reserve on our way to Bellebouche, where we spent three days in the Brenne, 'land of a thousand lakes'. This wide range of sites and habitats yielded a final total of 35 species of dragonflies, 40 species of butterflies, and 136 bird species, not to mention a wide range of other animals and plants, that the combined talents of the group helped to find and identify. The weather ranged from a cool 18°C on Day 2 to a sizzling 40°C plus on Day 6, curtailing walking (and odonata) activity somewhat! However, as the Brenne was a new area for all but one participant, we also took refuge in several of the newer bird hides that now grace the Brenne, enjoying great views of some of the Brennes' special birds. Day 1 Wednesday 22nd June Cool, sunny, 20°C The train from Paris arrived on time at Poitiers, at 16.53, where we all met up except for Hilary, who was meeting us at the hotel in Montmorillon.
  • Butterfly Diversity of Karnatak University Campus, Dharwad

    Butterfly Diversity of Karnatak University Campus, Dharwad

    IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) e-ISSN: 2319-2402,p- ISSN: 2319-2399.Volume 10, Issue 12 Ver. IV (Dec. 2016), PP 77-83 www.iosrjournals.org Butterfly Diversity of Karnatak University Campus, Dharwad Umapati Y; Usha D.N; Vedavati G.N; Girimalleshwar B; Veeranagoudar D.K and Pulikeshi M.B.* Department of Zoology, Karnatak University, Dharwad- 580003, Karnataka, India Abstract: Butterflies are part of our natural heritage which adds to increase the aesthetic value of our nature. They are very sensitive and are severely affected by the slightest variations in the environment. They form an important biota of the class Insecta, belonging to the order Lepidoptera. Butterflies have large, often brightly coloured and conspicuous wings used for fluttering type of flight. They form an important part of food chain and are good bio-indicators for evaluation of habitat change and variations in landscape structures. Butterflies and their caterpillars are dependent on specific host plants, thus the diversity of butterfly indirectly reflects the plant diversity of a particular area. Hence, the present study was undertaken to study the butterfly diversity of Karnatak University (KU) campus, Dharwad, in order to create a base line data for further research. In the present survey a total number of 36 species belonging to 25 genera falling under five different families were observed, identified and photographed. The members of the Nymphalidae family found to be dominated with 16 species under 11 genera followed by Pieridae (8), Papilionidae (6), Lycaenidae (4) and Hesperidae (2). The abundance of butterfly species in a particular area is directly proportional to the type and abundance of different flowers, plants in those respective areas.
  • Vegetation Survey of Batavia Downs, Cape York Peninsula

    Vegetation Survey of Batavia Downs, Cape York Peninsula

    QR91003 Vegetation survey of Batavia Downs Cape York Peninsula V. J. Neldner, J. R. Clarkson Botany Branch Department of Primary Industries & Brisbane Queensland Government Technical Report This report is a scanned copy and some detail may be illegible or lost. Before acting on any information, readers are strongly advised to ensure that numerals, percentages and details are correct. This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1991 For information about this report contact [email protected] Research Establishments Publication QR91003 Vegetation survey of Batavia Downs Cape York Peninsula V. J. Neldner, J. R. Clarkson Botany Branch Department of Primary Industries Brisbane ISSN 0813-4391 Agdex 301/06 This publication was prepared for officers of the Department of Primary Industries. It may be distributed to other interested individuals and organisations. © Queensland Government 1991 Department of Primary Industries, Queensland GPO Box 46 Brisbane Qld4001 Ill Contents List of figures Page iv List of tables iv List of plates iv Summary v 1.