DOCSLIB.ORG

Negotiating Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean: the Archaic and Classical Greek Multiethnic Emporia Denise Demetriou Index More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01944-7 - Negotiating Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean: The Archaic and Classical Greek Multiethnic Emporia Denise Demetriou Index More information Index Abu Simbel, 112n, 149 emporia, importance of in, 91–2, 94, 103 Adjiyska Vodenitza, 159n, 158–60, 160n Epaktia, 93 Adonia, 222 Epilimenia, 91, 92 Adonis, 84, 222 Euploia, 93, 218 Aegean Galenaia, 93 North, 155, 159–60, 168.SeealsoPistiros, Gravisca, worship of in, 77, 83, 86n, 88–90, trade network 102, 103, 139, 235 Sea, 19–21, 106, 130, 178, 188, 199 Hellenion and, 144, 234 Aeolians, 12–13, 110, 146–7, 236 Kition, worship of at, 222, 237 Aeschylus, 101, 167–8 Kos, worship of at, 92–3, 141 Africa, North, 4, 68, 106 kourotrophos, 101–2, 139 Agathe, 22, 24, 29–30, 37–8, 38n Naukratis, worship of in, 81, 89, 114, 138, Agde.SeeAgathe 139–42, 235 Aigina, 64, 80, 91, 92–3, 103, 145n.Seealso navigation, patron of, 91–5, 234 Gravisca Ourania, 93, 220–1 Athens and, 184, 197 Pandemos, 93, 140, 141 Naukratis and, 80, 110, 129, 135, 142, Peiraieus, worship of in, 92, 218–22, 228 237 Pontia, 93, 141 script of, 64, 78, 80 Pontia kai Limenia, 93 temple of Aphaia in, 68 prostitutes and, 140–1 Aiginetan(s), 80–1, 129, 138–9, 237.Seealso sacred prostitution and, 82, 90–1 Sostratos of Aigina traders and, 93–5 Gravisca, 64, 83, 103 Turan and, 90, 97–8, 102, 103–4, 233 Alexander, 119, 155, 216n Apollo, 70, 89.Seealsocity-ethnic, Apollo Amadokos II, 163, 164, 165n, 182, 183, 185 Aigina and, 64, 80, 83, 103, 211, 237 Amasis, Pharaoh, 7, 148, 150–1 archegetes, 57, 59, 87 foundation of Naukratis by, 111n, 112n, Delos and, 58 111–13, 114–15, 121, 122, 125, 129, Delphi and, 7, 59, 107 217–18 Delphinios, 55, 59 philhellene, 106–7, 110, 122n, 127, 149.See Didyma and, 59n also Delphi Gravisca and, 77, 103 stele of, 148–9 healing god, 99 Amnisos, 89, 96 Hellenion and, 144, 234 Amphipolis, 184n, 189 Miletos, worship of in, 59, 80 anchors, votive, 64, 80, 86–8, 89, 91, 138.See Naukratis, worship of in, 113, 130, 135, also Aphrodite 137–9, 142, 146, 151, 235, 237 Andalusia, 20, 24, 38, 107 navigation, god of, 86–7, 91 Aphrodite Apollonia, 163, 182 anatomical offerings to, 99, 101 Apollonians, 36, 162, 171, 174, 182, 184, 186, anchor dedications to, 87, 88, 91, 92, 95, 234 104 Apollonides of Halikarnassos, 79 Astarte and, 115, 222 Apollonides of Sidon, 213 coastal temples of, 92 Apollonios of Rhodes, 87, 167 284 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01944-7 - Negotiating Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean: The Archaic and Classical Greek Multiethnic Emporia Denise Demetriou Index More information Index 285 Apries, 113n, 131n, 149.SeealsoAmasis, stele klerouchy, 188 of metronomoi of, 194 Ares, 156n, 170 navy of, 192, 196–7, 202 Arganthonios, 24, 30, 64.SeealsoTartessos Odrysian Dynasts and, 163, 170, 185 Aristarche, 55–6 port of at Phaleron, 196 Aristotle, 25, 34n sitophylakes of, 194 Artaxerxes, 206 Thrace and, 155, 157–8, 168, 183, 188, Artemis, 70 222–7, 238 archegetis, 57, 63 Attica, 15, 105, 181, 188, 189 Bendis and, 156n, 226, 229 Avram, Alexandru, 167, 171, 174, 178–80 Ephesos, of on Black Sea coast, 68n Baal, 209, 217, 229 and Emporitan identity, 63 Babylonians, 6n, 107 and Ionian identity, 28, 57–8, 63, 152 Balearic Islands, 4, 67 and Greek identity, 28 Basigerros, 52 and Massaliote identity, 28, 53, 60, 62 Basped, 43, 52 and Phokaian identity, 28, 63, 80, 83, 211, Belana emporia, 162, 163–4, 166n, 167, 169, 237–8 177–9, 181, 214, 238.SeealsoDeris, worship of, 60–1, 145, 225, 235, 238 Kobrys, Kypasis healing, goddess of, 99 Bendis, 7, 156, 156n Hegemone, 56, 63 Athens, worship of in, 218, 223n, 222–7, Hellenion and, 144, 234 228–9, 234, 235, 238 Leukophryne, 57–8 orgeones of, 224–6, 228, 234 Mounychia, 227 Berisades, 163, 164, 165n, 182, 185 Orthia, 61 Berytos, 210–11, 237 Soteira, 56 Bes, 88, 89–90, 101–2, 107, 117 Thrace, worship of in, 170 Black Sea, 178, 181, 189, 199 Asia Minor, 13, 24, 58–9, 68, 122, 146n, 147, lead letters from, 41n 165, 199, 237 settlements along, 3, 4, 19, 101, 155 Asklepios, 54, 99, 99n Bleruas, 43, 52 Astarte, 93n, 100n, 101, 115, 222 boat-owner, 79, 93, 94, 199, 202, 210–12, 213, asylia, 57, 172 215–16.Seealsonaukleros Athena, 87, 101n, 168 Boiai, 56–7, 58 Hellenia, 145n Braudel, Fernand, 2, 2n, 3n Lindia, 107, 125, 127 Bravo, Benedetto, 175–7 Athenaios, 111, 119, 124, 141 Bresson, Alain, 18n, 18–19, 119–20, 122, Athenians, 147, 181, 184, 191, 196, 198, 200, 146 203, 210, 212, 215–16 Bulgaria, 153, 155, 158 Athens agora of, 68, 193, 198, 202, 204–5, 232 cadastral studies, 37–9 agoranomoi of, 193, 194 Campania, 37, 99 Aphrodite, worship of in, 89, 101, 140 Canaanites, 10.SeealsoPhoenicians astynomoi of, 194 Caria, 106, 173 currency of, 134, 189, 230 Carians, 82–3, 130, 148, 150, 151 dokimastes of, 195 Carthage, 26, 68, 76, 107 emporikai dikai of, 172, 194, 198, 201n, Carthaginian(s), 7, 68 204–5, 233 Catalonia, 26, 29, 31, 62 emporion of, 19–21, 92, 188, 190–2, 194–6. Charaxos, 157.SeealsoSappho, Rhodopis See also Peiraieus Chersonese, 155, 166, 170, 181, 188n foreign residents of, 4–5, 106, 190, 198–9, Chians, 81, 129, 137–9, 140 220, 232 Chios, 89, 110, 123, 129, 131, 213 foreigners, rewards to granted by, 211–17, city-ethnic, 36, 36n, 78, 81, 120, 134, 137, 139, 233 150, 203, 212, 221, 236 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01944-7 - Negotiating Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean: The Archaic and Classical Greek Multiethnic Emporia Denise Demetriou Index More information 286 Index city-state culture, 6, 67, 90, 105, 230, 239 perceptions of Greeks in, 147–51, 158, 174, colonization, 4, 13, 26–7, 33, 39, 57–8, 63, 100, 236 135, 156, 188 Persian period of, 112, 123 Copenhagen Polis Centre, 6n, 17, 33, 120 popularity of art of, 8, 89, 95, 107–8 Corinth, 19, 91n, 93, 196 religion of, 101, 105. See also individual gods Corinthian(s), 107, 144, 196 Ehrhardt, Norbert, 77, 82 Corsica, 4, 56n, 67–8, 70, 238 eisphora, 202, 208, 215, 232 Coulson, William D. E., 114, 144 Elephantine, 122, 148, 150 Crete, 4, 89, 96, 196 emporion/emporia Croesus, 7, 58, 82–3, 147 agrarian vs. commercial colonies/apoikia vs. Cyprus, 8, 68, 92, 94, 99, 133, 199, 212–13 emporion, 21–2, 33–9, 118 Aphrodite in Paphos, temple of in, 94, 142 archaeology of, 21–3 Aphrodite, worship of in, 92n, 94n, 101 communities that were emporia vs. island identity of, 134 communities that had an emporion, 18 mercenary soldiers and, 106 definition of, 14, 18–19, 33, 74 Naukratis and, 130, 138 dependent, 19, 23 Phoenicians on, 4, 133n inland, 19n, 158 Cypriot(s), 133n, 132–4, 145, 222n multiethnic nature of, 15, 20, 22–3, 44, 139 Damoxenos, 124–7, 129, 214 name of settlement, 39n.SeealsoEmporion Daphnai, 122, 131 non-Greek, 20, 28 Delos, 58, 79, 87, 89, 93, 106n port-of-trade as, 17–18 koina on, 210–11, 222, 224, 237 trading post as, 17, 140 Delphi, 7, 13 Emporion.SeealsoEmporitai, Iberia, Iberians, Amasis and, 107 Indiketans, Neapolis, Palaiapolis oracle of, 56, 56n, 59n, 191 civic identity of, 49, 52, 63, 236 proxenoi at, 145, 235 commercial vs. agrarian colony, 37–9, 118 Rhodopis and, 157 common constitution of, 50, 63 treasuries at, Etruscan, 68 dipolis,as,45–7, 49, 63 Demeter, 7n, 77, 84–6, 101n, 102–3 distinct political identities in, 49–52 Kore and, 38, 86 foundation of, 29 Demosthenes, 79, 124, 163, 166, 169, 171–2, Iberians in, 46–9 180–1, 194 Ionian identity in, 28, 50, 63 Deris, 166, 178.SeealsoKobrys, Kypasis, Hellenic identity in, 28, 50 Belana emporia lead letters of, 35–6, 40–4, 52, 227, 231 Dexikreon, 94 Massalia and, 23, 30, 31, 50 Dionysus, 67, 97, 156n, 162, 170n, 169–71, Massaliote identity in, 31, 53 186, 234, 238 mixed Greek pottery in, 40 Diopeithes, 209–11, 237.SeealsoShama-baal Phokaian identity in, 31, 50, 63 Dioskouroi, 77, 84, 103, 139, 144, 234 worship of Artemis of Ephesos in, 53–4, Dorians, 50, 59 59–61, 225, 234 Hellenion and, 110, 146–7, 236 Emporitai, 35, 40, 53 identity of, 12–13, 146 emporitai, 36, 162, 167, 171, 173–6, 177, 179, Domaradzka, Lidia, 168, 174 181–2, 183, 184 Doricho.SeeRhodopis enktesis, 202, 204, 213, 215, 216, 218–20, 222–5, 226, 233 Egypt/Egyptians, 15.SeealsoNaukratis epaulistai, 162, 167–8, 169, 175, 176 Athens and, 5, 199, 220 Ephesos, 55, 57–8, 61, 82, 238 foreigners in, 106, 125–7, 214 Epimeletes/epimeletai. See also Peiraieus, Greek perceptions of, 108–9 epimeletai identity of, 105, 109, 117, 151 orgeones of, 224 Mediterranean, connections with, 4, 105–7 thiasos of, 222 foreign mercenaries in, 5, 106, 120, 122, Eros, 97, 102 148–51, 157 ethnicity, 1, 9, 11, 133, 144 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01944-7 - Negotiating Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean: The Archaic and Classical Greek Multiethnic Emporia Denise Demetriou Index More information Index 287 Etruria, 4, 15, 64–7. See also individual cities Hellenes, 10, 13–14, 151, 211 city-state culture of, 6, 67 Hellenicity, 13–14, 145, 238 Delphi and, 7, 68 Hellenion, 105, 109, 142, 174.Seealsoprostatai Greeks in, 66.SeealsoGravisca of emporia popularity of Attic pottery in, 78, 189 foundation date of, 112, 144 religion of, 70, 97.
Recommended publications
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021

    Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021

    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
  • The Origins of the Kouros

    The Origins of the Kouros

    THE ORIGINS OF THE KOUROS By REBECCA ANN DUNHAM A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Rebecca Ann Dunham This document is dedicated to my mom. TABLE OF CONTENTS page LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................................x CHAPTER 1 DEFINITION OF THE KOUROS TYPE ....................................................................1 Pose...............................................................................................................................2 Size and material...........................................................................................................2 Nudity ...........................................................................................................................3 Body Shape and Treatment of Musculature .................................................................3 Execution ......................................................................................................................4 Function ........................................................................................................................5 Provenances ..................................................................................................................7
  • Naukratis, Heracleion-Thonis and Alexandria

    Naukratis, Heracleion-Thonis and Alexandria

    Originalveröffentlichung in: Damian Robinson, Andrew Wilson (Hg.), Alexandria and the North-Western Delta. Joint conference proceedings of Alexandria: City and Harbour (Oxford 2004) and The Trade and Topography of Egypt's North-West Delta, 8th century BC to 8th century AD (Berlin 2006), Oxford 2010, S. 15-24 2: Naukratis, Heracleion-Thonis and Alexandria - Remarks on the Presence and Trade Activities of Greeks in the North-West Delta from the Seventh Century BC to the End of the Fourth Century BC Stefan Pfeiffer The present article examines how Greek trade in Egypt 2. Greeks and SaTtic Egypt developed and the consequences that the Greek If we disregard the Minoan and Mycenaean contacts economic presence had on political and economic condi ­ with Egypt, we can establish Greco-Egyptian relations as tions in Egypt. I will focus especially on the Delta region far back as the seventh century BC.2 A Greek presence and, as far as possible, on the city of Heracleion-Thonis on in the Delta can be established directly or indirectly for the Egyptian coast, discovered by Franck Goddio during the following places: Naukratis, Korn Firin, Sais, Athribis, underwater excavations at the end of the twentieth Bubastis, Mendes, Tell el-Mashkuta, Daphnai and century. The period discussed here was an exceedingly Magdolos. 3 In most of the reports, 4 Rhakotis, the settle­ exciting one for Egypt, as the country, forced by changes ment preceding Alexandria, is mentioned as the location in foreign policy, reversed its isolation from the rest of the of the Greeks, an assumption based on a misinterpreted ancient world.
  • Spies (Kataskopoi, Otakoustai)

    Spies (Kataskopoi, Otakoustai)

    ch3.qxd 10/18/1999 2:12 PM Page 103 Chapter 3 Beyond the Pale: Spies (Kataskopoi, Otakoustai) It is almost as dif‹cult to de‹ne a spy as to catch one. The most common word among the Greeks for spies was kataskopoi, but throughout the classical era they did not use this term for spies alone: an author might employ it in one context where we would say “spy,” in another where we would understand “scout,” in a third where we would have dif‹culty translating it at all.1 Otakoustai were consistently used as covert agents, but they were rarely sent abroad.2 Is it then anachronistic to distinguish spies from other agents? The answer to this problem can perhaps be found in a distinction in the social perception of different types of kataskopoi (et al.). Some kataskopoi (i.e., spies) were perceived by their victims as treacherous and seem to have been subject to legislation concerning treachery; others (i.e., scouts et al.) were not.3 Whereas spies were normally interrogated under 1. Thucydides, e.g., used kataskopoi for spies at 6.45.1 (they were not named but were distinguished from other sources reporting to the Syracusans) and 8.6.4 (the perioikos Phry- nis, discussed shortly); mounted scouts at 6.63.3; and of‹cial investigators at 4.27.3–4 (Cleon and Theagenes, chosen by the Athenians to investigate matters at Pylos) and 8.41.1 (men appointed to oversee the Spartan navarch Astyochus). The word kataskopos is not found in Homer—he instead used episkopos or skopos indiscriminately for spies, scouts, watchers, and overseers.
  • Naukratis: Greek Diversity in Egypt

    Naukratis: Greek Diversity in Egypt

    Naukratis: Greek Diversity in Egypt Studies on East Greek Pottery and Exchange in the Eastern Mediterranean Edited by Alexandra Villing and Udo Schlotzhauer The British Museum Research Publication Number 162 Publishers The British Museum Great Russell Street London WC1B 3DG Series Editor Dr Josephine Turquet Distributors The British Museum Press 46 Bloomsbury Street London WC1B 3QQ Naukratis: Greek Diversity in Egypt Studies on East Greek Pottery and Exchange in the Eastern Mediterranean Edited by Alexandra Villing and Udo Schlotzhauer Front cover: Fragment of North Ionian black-figure amphora (?) from Naukratis. British Museum GR 1886.4-1.1282 (Vase B 102.33) ISBN-13 978-086159-162-6 ISBN-10 086159-162-3 ISSN 0142 4815 © The Trustees of the British Museum 2006 Note: the British Museum Occasional Papers series is now entitled British Museum Research Publications.The OP series runs from 1 to 150, and the RP series, keeping the same ISSN and ISBN preliminary numbers, begins at number 151. For a complete catalogue of the full range of OPs and RPs see the series website: www/the britishmuseum.ac.uk/researchpublications or write to: Oxbow Books, Park End Place Oxford OX1 1HN, UK Tel:(+44) (0) 1865 241249 e mail [email protected] website www.oxbowbooks.com or The David Brown Book Co PO Box 511, Oakville CT 06779, USA Tel:(+1) 860 945 9329;Toll free 1 800 791 9354 e mail [email protected] Printed and bound in UK by Latimer Trend & Co. Ltd. Contents Contributors v Preface vii Naukratis and the Eastern Mediterranean: Past, Present and
  • Ideas Concerning the Historical Identity and the Connections of the City of Phaselis an Eastern Mediterranean Port*

    Ideas Concerning the Historical Identity and the Connections of the City of Phaselis an Eastern Mediterranean Port*

    Mediterranean Journal of Humanities mjh.akdeniz.edu.tr II/1, 2012, 205-212 Ideas Concerning the Historical Identity and the Connections of the City of Phaselis an Eastern Mediterranean Port* Bir Doğu Akdeniz Limanı Olarak Phaselis Kentinin Tarihsel Kimliği ve Bağlantıları Hakkında Düşünceler Nihal TÜNER ÖNEN** Abstract: This article is based upon ancient sources and numismatic and epigraphic evidence and evaluates the historical identity of Phaselis, located on the border of Lycia-Pamphylia, within the framework of its relations with eastern Mediterranean ports. Phaselis and settlements such as: Gagai, Corydalla and Rho- diapolis had a Hellenic identity in early times and this is compatible with Rhodes’ attempts especially in the VII c. to found new colonies in Lycia and Cilicia, reflecting its desire to participate in the ongoing commercial activities in the eastern Mediterranean. When the temporal context of this dominance is investigated, antroponymic data interestingly reveals that Phaselis retained its Hellenic characters until the Roman Period, while other Rhodian colonies on the east Lycian coast lost many elements of their Hellenic identity in the V and IV centuries B.C. The second section deals with the inferences drawn concerning the historical identity of the city in the perspective of its connections within the eastern Mediterranean. This section examines the commercial aspects of this relationship in particular through presenting the spread of Archaic Period coins struck by Phaselis in eastern Mediterranean cities such as: Damanhur, Benha el Asl, Zagazig, in Syria, in the Anti-Lebanon and in Jordan. Thus, through extending the observations of these commercial links within the context of emporion the city possessed in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods, data concerning the network of regional and inter-regional relations formed by Phaselis in the eastern Mediterranean are examined in detail.
  • Daftar Arsip Legiun Veteran Ri Daerah Pendaftaran Sumatera Selatan Tahun 1959-1983

    Daftar Arsip Legiun Veteran Ri Daerah Pendaftaran Sumatera Selatan Tahun 1959-1983

    DAFTAR ARSIP LEGIUN VETERAN RI DAERAH PENDAFTARAN SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN 1959-1983 SUBDIT PENGOLAHAN ARSIP KONVENSIONAL STL 1945 ARSIP NASIONAL REPUBLIK INDONESIA 2010 DAFTAR ARSIP VETERAN PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN TAHUN 1959 – 1983 SUB DIT PENGOLAHAN ARKON SETELAH TAHUN 1945 ARSIP NASIONAL REPUBLIK INDONESIA 2010 KATA PENGANTAR Sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan, bahwa perlu dilakukan pengolahan khazanah arsip statis yang ada di ANRI. Oleh karena itu, pada kesempatan ini ANRI menyajikan hasil pengolahan arsip berbentuk Daftar Arsip Veteran Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Tahun 1959 - 1983. Substansi informasi pada daftar arsip tersebut merupakan daftar perorangan para veteran, data keluarga yang menjadi tanggungan veteran (ahli waris), surat keterangan persaksian, riwayat perjuanan veteran beserta nomor pokok veteran untuk wilayah Sumatera Selatan pada kurun waktu 1959 - 1983. Daftar ini terdiri dari 18 boks, 53 jilid terbagi dalam 3.216 nomor. Daftar arsip ini diharapkan dapat menjadi sumbangan berarti bagi peningkatan layanan publik yang dilakukan oleh Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia, dan dapat meningkatkan aksesibilitas publik pada kahsanah arsip statis yang ada di ANRI. Para pengguna diharapkan dapat memperoleh informasi akurat mengenai arsip veteran di wilayah Sumatera Selatan. Terbitnya Daftar Arsip Veteran Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Tahun 1959 - 1983 merupakan karya yang dihasilkan oleh Tim Pengolah Arsip di lingkungan Sub Direktorat Pengolahan Arsip Konvensional Setelah Tahun 1945. Daftar Arsip Veteran Provinsi Sumatera Selatan ini disajikan kepada publik untuk panduan penemuan arsip yang dibutuhkan dan memberi sumbangan yang berarti bagi para penggunanya. Jakarta, November 2010 Direktur Pengolahan, Drs. Mustari Irawan, MPA KETERANGAN Khazanah arsip Veteran Wilayah Provinsi Sumatera Selatan ini diatur berdasarkan sistem alfabetis dengan mengacu pada abjad nama para anggota veteran.
  • Troas Filipos Tesalónica Berea Atenas

    Troas Filipos Tesalónica Berea Atenas

    Lección 15 © Copyright Basado en material de W. Mark Lanier. Usado con permiso. Europa Asia Europa Asia Filipos Tesalónica Berea Troas Atenas Tesalónica 70 millas (5 días a pie) Tesalónica 70 millas (5 días a pie) Tesalónica 70 millas (5 días a pie) Filipos Tesalónica Berea Troas Atenas Berea 45-50 millas (3 días a pie) Filipos Tesalónica Berea Troas Atenas Éstos eran de sentimientos más nobles que los de Tesalónica, de modo que recibieron el mensaje con toda avidez y todos los días examinaban las Escrituras para ver si era verdad lo que se les anunciaba. (Hechos 17:11 ) Filipos Tesalónica Berea Troas Atenas Los Bereanos ayudan a Pablo a llegar a Atenas Filipos Tesalónica Berea Troas Atenas 1. Unfinished Temple of Zeus 2. Unfinished law courts 3. Painted Stoa 4. Stoa of Hermes 5. Altar of the Twelve Gods 6. Stoa of Zeus with his statue 7. Temple of Hephaestus (Theseion) 8. Bouleyterion 9. Monument of the Eponymous Heroes 10. Tholos 11. Strategeion 12. Southwest Fountain House 13. Heliaia law courts 14. South Stoa 15. Southeast Fountain House 16. Mint 17. Panathenaic festival procession 18. Pnyx (Demosthenes delivered his Third Philippic here.) 19. Areopagus 20. Temple of Athena Nike 21. Propylaia 22. Statue of Athena Promachos 23. Erechtheum 24. Parthenon 25. Royal Stoa 1. Unfinished Temple of Zeus 2. Unfinished law courts 3. Painted Stoa 4. Stoa of Hermes 5. Altar of the Twelve Gods 6. Stoa of Zeus with his statue 7. Temple of Hephaestus (Theseion) 8. Bouleyterion 9. Monument of the Eponymous Heroes 10. Tholos 11.
  • Aparchai and Phoroi: a New Commented Edition of the Athenian

    Aparchai and Phoroi: a New Commented Edition of the Athenian

    Thèse de doctorat présentée à la Faculté des Lettres de l'Université de Fribourg (Suisse) Aparchai and Phoroi A New Commented Edition of the Athenian Tribute Quota Lists and Assessment Decrees Part I : Text Björn Paarmann (Danemark) 2007 Contents Preface 3 Introduction 7 Research History 16 The Tribute Lists as a Historical Source 37 Chapter 1. The Purpose of the Tribute Lists 40 1.1 The Tribute Quota Lists 40 1.1.1 Archives or Symbols? 40 1.1.2 Archives? 40 1.1.2 Accounts? 42 1.1.3 Votives? 43 1.1.4 Conclusion 50 1.2 The Assessment Decrees 52 1.3. Conclusion: Θεοί and θεδι 53 Chapter 2. The Geographical Distribution of the Ethnics 55 2.1 The Organisation of the Quota Lists 55 2.2 The Interpretation of the Data 58 2.3 Conclusion 63 Chapter 3. Tribute Amount and the Size of the Pokis 64 3.1 Tribute Amount and Surface Area 64 3.2 Examination of the Evidence 73 3.3 Conclusion 77 Chapter 4. Ethnics and Toponyms in the Tribute Lists 78 Conclusion: On the Shoulders of Giants 87 Future Perspectives 91 Appendix: Size of the Members of the Delian League 92 Bibliography 97 Plates 126 Preface A new edition of the tribute quota lists and assessment decrees needs, if not an excuse, then perhaps at least an explanation. Considering the primary importance of these historical sources, it is astonishing how little attention has been paid to the way they have been edited by Meritt, McGregor and Wade-Gery in The Athenian Tnbute Lists (ATL) I-IV from 1939-1953 and by Meritt in Inscnptiones Graecae (IG I3) 254-291 from 1981 during the last several decades.1 This negligence on the part of contemporary scholars, both ancient historians and, more surprisingly, also Greek epigraphists, stands in sharp contrast to the central place the lists take in academic articles, monographs and history books dealing with Greek history of the fifth century BC.
  • DEMOCRACY in ATHENS 30 000 Slaves Athens Was the City-State in Which Citizens Had the Most Involvement in the Government

    DEMOCRACY in ATHENS 30 000 Slaves Athens Was the City-State in Which Citizens Had the Most Involvement in the Government

    Chapter 3 ANCIENT ATHENS In ancient times, several civilisations developed in the area we now know as Greece. Over time, city-states developed. The most influential of the city-states was Athens, especially in the period that became known as the Classical Age, from the fifth to the fourth century BC. During this period, the Athenians developed the form of government known as democracy, succeeded in fighting off their enemies and developed a rich culture. Pericles was the influential leader at the centre of many of the achievements of this time, which is also known as the ‘Golden Age’ of Athens. Historical knowledge and understanding • Learn about change and its impact on the lives of ancient Athenians. • Learn about the continuity in our own time of the democratic traditions that originated in ancient Athens. • Learn about the contributions of ancient Athenians to the identity of their city and the world beyond it. • Learn about cause and effect by evaluating the role of key individuals and events in ancient Athens. • Learn about sources of information on the ancient Athenian and Greek world. Historical reasoning and interpretation • Frame questions and plan investigations based on your knowledge of ancient Athens. • Develop skills in gathering and documenting A photograph of part of the Erechtheum, Athens, today evidence from sources to analyse what they reveal about the culture and values of ancient Athens. Dark Age • Know and use key words and conventions in the Bronze Age language of history. • Communicate your understanding of history 3000 BC 2000 BC 1000 BC 900 BC 800 BC 700 BC through a variety of presentations.
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion

    Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion

    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 8 | 1995 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.605 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1995 Number of pages: 205-266 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion », Kernos [Online], 8 | 1995, Online since 11 April 2011, connection on 16 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 Kernos Kernos, 8 (1995), p, 205-266. EpigrapWc Bulletin for Greek Religion 1991 (EBGR) This fifth issue of BEGR presents the publications of 1991 along with several addenda to BEGR 1987-1990. The division of the work between New York and Heidelberg, for the first time this year, caused certain logistical prablems, which can be seen in several gaps; some publications of 1991 could not be considered for this issue and will be included in the next BEGR, together with the publications of 1992. We are optimistic that in the future we will be able to accelerate the presentation of epigraphic publications. The principles explained in Kernos, 4 (991), p. 287-288 and Kernos, 7 (994), p. 287 apply also to this issue, The abbreviations used are those of L'Année Philologique and the Supplementum Bpigraphicum Graecum. We remind our readers that the bulletin is not a general bibliography on Greek religion; works devoted exclusively to religious matters (marked here with an asterisk) are presented very briefly, even if they make extensive use of inscriptions, In exceptional cases (see n° 87) we include in our bulletin studies on the Linear B tablets.
  • Cedrus.Akdeniz.Edu.Tr CEDRUS Cedrus V (2017) 57-77 the Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201704

    Cedrus.Akdeniz.Edu.Tr CEDRUS Cedrus V (2017) 57-77 the Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201704

    cedrus.akdeniz.edu.tr CEDRUS Cedrus V (2017) 57-77 The Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201704 ANCIENT CNIDUS AND ITS VICINITY (700-400 BC) ANTİKÇAĞ’DA KNIDOS VE ÇEVRESİ (MÖ 700-400) ∗ ∗∗ MUZAFFER DEMİR ALİCAN DOĞAN Abstract: Scholars still debate the issue of the location of Öz: Knidos’un lokalizasyonu konusunu hala tartışıl- Cnidus. On contrary to the views of some scholars, it ap- maktadır. Bazı bilim adamlarının görüşlerinin aksine pears that Cnidus was not relocated from Burgaz to Tekir Knidos’un Burgaz’dan Tekir’e taşınmadığı, aslında kolo- and that actually it lied just across the promontory of nizasyon döneminden itibaren Knidos Kherrone- Triopium on the mainland at the tip of Cnidian Cherro- sos’unun ucunda anakara üzerindeki Triopion Bur- nesus from the colonial period onwards. It had surren- nu’nun hemen karşısında uzandığı görülmektedir. Kni- dered to the Persian general Harpagus in 546 BC. It does dos, MÖ 546’da Pers generali Harpagos’un eline geç- not seem to have involved in Ionian revolt, even though mişti. Karia kentlerinin çoğunun Ionia Ayaklanması’na most of the Carian cities supported it. After the establish- destek vermesine rağmen Knidos isyana katılmamış gibi ment of the Delian League in 478 BC, its military leaders, görünmektedir. Hatta isyan süreci ve sonrasında Persleri Pausanias and Cimon, sailed to the coasts of Caria and desteklemiş bile olabilirler. Pers tehdidine karşı MÖ 478 Lycia to control over the cities there and then get their yılında Attika Delos Birliği kurulduktan sonra Pausanias financial support, including Cnidus. Having extended ve Kimon gibi birliğin bazı askeri liderleri, kentleri her political hegemony over the seas, Athens secured the hâkimiyet altına almak için Karia ve Lykia kıyılarına overall control of the League by 454 BC.