Energy Optimisation of Communication Techniques Between Communicating Objects Yue Peng

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy Optimisation of Communication Techniques Between Communicating Objects Yue Peng Energy optimisation of communication techniques between communicating objects Yue Peng To cite this version: Yue Peng. Energy optimisation of communication techniques between communicating objects. Elec- tronics. UNIVERSITE DE NANTES, 2015. English. tel-01250686 HAL Id: tel-01250686 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01250686 Submitted on 5 Jan 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Public Domain Thèse de Doctorat Yue PENG Mémoire présenté en vue de l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université de Nantes Sous le label de l’Université Nantes Angers Le Mans École doctorale Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et Mathématiques (STIM) Discipline : Electronique Laboratoire : IETR UMR 6164 Soutenance le 9 novembre 2015 Energy optimisation of communication techniques between communicating objects JURY Président M. Kosaï RAOOF, Professeur, ENSIM, Université du Maine Rapporteur M. Olivier BERDER, Professeur, IUT de Lannion Rapporteur M. Yannis POUSSET, Professeur, Université de Poitiers Examinateur M. Jean-Yves BAUDAIS, Chargé de Recherche CNRS/HDR, IETR, Rennes Directeur de Thèse M. Jean-François DIOURIS, Professeur, Ecole polytechnique de l’université de Nantes Encadrant M. Guillaume ANDRIEUX, Maître de Conférences, IUT de la Roche s/Yon ED-503 Acknowledgments Have a lot of wonderful memories, I went through four years journey in Nantes. The people I met here is really unbelievable. A few words mentioned here cannot capture all my appreciation to your supports and the pleasure you brought to me. First of all, I would like to express my great thanks to my advisor, Professor Jean- François Diouris. It has been a pleasant experience of working with him. I want to thank him for his gentleness, encouragement and inspiration. I have benefited tremen- dously from that, not only at the academic research but also on the personal growth. This impact will go along with me throughout my life. I would also like to thank Guillaume Andrieux, Assistant Professor, for many con- tributions of his perspective to refine the works of my thesis and for his countless help during the writing of my thesis. Grateful acknowledgments are also given to Professor Yannis Pousset and Pro- fessor Olivier Berder, the reviewers of my thesis, for their acceptance of being the reviewer of my thesis. The IETR lab has provided a great collegial environment for academic research. I thank Professor Yide Wang, for his tremendous supports and also good care for my daily life. The works in IETR cannot be so efficient without help from Sandrine Char- lier, secretary of IETR, Marc Brunet, engineer of IETR. They deserve many thanks. At last, for my family and my friends, I want to thank Zhu QI, Ting Zhang, Xiaoting Xiao, Zhaoxin Chen, Hong kun... We had a wonderful memory of both working and traveling in Europe. 3 Contents 1 Introduction 15 1.1 Energy conservation in Wireless Sensor Networks........... 16 1.2 Objectives of the work......................... 19 1.3 The outline of the thesis......................... 19 2 Energy efficient transmission techniques 21 2.1 Fundamental Shannon limit....................... 22 2.2 Modulation............................... 26 2.2.1 Binary phase-shift keying (BPSK)............... 26 2.2.2 OOK.............................. 27 2.2.3 Orthogonal modulation..................... 27 2.3 Minimum energy coding schemes................... 31 2.3.1 Minimum energy coding.................... 31 2.3.2 Modified minimum energy coding............... 34 2.4 Error control scheme.......................... 37 2.4.1 Overview of error control................... 37 2.4.2 Example of error-correction code: Hamming code...... 38 2.4.3 Error correction in ME-Coding................. 40 2.4.4 Error correction codes combined with ME-Coding...... 42 2.5 ME-coding on different communication channels........... 43 2.5.1 AWGN channel and Rayleigh fading channel......... 44 2.5.2 Error probability in AWGN channel and Rayleigh fading channel 46 2.5.3 Simulation results versus theoretic results.......... 55 2.6 Summary................................ 57 3 Energy consumption models 59 3.1 The architecture of a typical wireless sensor node........... 60 3.2 General energy consumption model.................. 62 5 6 CONTENTS 3.2.1 General energy consumption model of fully-functioning node 63 3.2.2 General power consumption model of communication link.. 65 3.2.3 Application of the model to based OOK ME Coding..... 67 3.3 OOK matched energy consumption models.............. 69 3.3.1 Normal energy consumption model.............. 69 3.3.2 Condition and analysis of the proposed model........ 74 3.3.3 Shutdown energy consumption model............. 78 3.4 Conclusion............................... 82 4 Energy efficiency of Minimum Energy coding 83 4.1 Description of the studied devices................... 84 4.1.1 The first OOK transmitter................... 84 4.1.2 High performance OOK transmitter.............. 85 4.1.3 OOK receiver.......................... 86 4.2 Energy consumption study of a realistic transmitter.......... 87 4.2.1 Minimum energy coding and BER analysis.......... 88 4.2.2 Energy consumption model.................. 89 4.2.3 Energy Consumption Analysis................. 94 4.2.4 Conclusion........................... 97 4.3 Energy analysis of a high performance transmitter.......... 98 4.3.1 Energy consumption model of the 52pJ/bit OOK transmitter. 98 4.3.2 Energy consumption improvement............... 101 4.3.3 Optimization of the coding size................ 103 4.3.4 Conclusion........................... 106 4.4 Receiver energy consumption...................... 106 4.4.1 Energy consumption Model.................. 107 4.4.2 Energy consumption of the receiver.............. 108 4.5 Conclusion............................... 111 5 Error control schemes and Application 115 5.1 Error Control Protocols......................... 116 5.1.1 Automatic repeat request Protocol............... 116 5.1.2 Energy consumption performance analysis.......... 118 5.1.3 Numerical results........................ 120 5.1.4 Conclusion........................... 124 5.2 Self powered Energy Efficient OOK Transmitter............ 124 CONTENTS 7 5.2.1 Optimization of the autonomous transmitter.......... 125 5.3 Summary................................ 134 6 Conclusion and future works 137 6.1 Conclusion............................... 137 6.2 Future works.............................. 139 A Index of value definition 141 B Optimization of the coding size 143 C Résumé étendu (French extended abstract) 147 D Research and Published Papers 153 List of Tables 2.1 Minimum-Energy Code table for k = 2 and 3.............. 33 3.1 System parameter............................ 68 3.2 The simulation parameter........................ 75 3.3 The simulation parameter........................ 80 4.1 The parameter of the transmitter.................... 100 4.2 The transmit parameter of the transmitter............... 101 4.3 The parameter of particular case.................... 106 4.4 Energy per codeword in shutdown mode................ 108 5.1 The circuit parameters......................... 123 5.2 PIC12LF 1501 power consumption as the function of the DC voltage using the low energy 31kHz internal oscillator............ 128 5.3 RT40-433 power model parameters.................. 128 5.4 Required r(M) in dB for M orthogonal modulations......... 130 9 List of Figures 1.1 Taxonomy of approaches to energy savings in sensor networks..... 17 2.1 Trade-off between energy efficiency and bandwidth efficiency..... 24 2.2 Transmit and total energy per bit as a function of the bit rate..... 25 2.3 Constellation diagram example for BPSK................ 26 2.4 The probability of bit error for othogonal modulations......... 29 2.5 Trade-off between energy efficiency and spectrum efficiency for or- thogonal modulations.......................... 30 2.6 Typical OOK Modulation Scheme.................... 31 2.7 Block Diagram of ME Mapping Scheme................ 32 2.8 Flow of chip-by-chip detection process................. 34 2.9 The principle of MME coding...................... 35 2.10 Receive MME to ME energy gain.................... 37 2.11 Bit error probability for Hamming code and BPSK modulation..... 40 2.12 Error Correction with Code-by-Code Detection............. 41 2.13 AWGN Channel............................. 44 2.14 Example of hard decision process for ME-Coding........... 49 2.15 Performance of ME-coding in AWGN channel............ 56 2.16 Performance of ME-coding in Rayleigh fading channel........ 56 3.1 The architecture of a typical wireless sensor node............ 60 3.2 Power consumption of a typical wireless sensor node......... 61 3.3 Block diagram of a fully-functioning node............... 62 3.4 A link model............................... 63 3.5 A model of the microsensor node.................... 63 3.6 Burst receive/transmit cycle for Bluetooth Transceiver......... 65 3.7 Transmitter Circuit Blocks (Analog)................... 66 3.8 Receiver Circuit Blocks......................... 66 11 12 LIST OF FIGURES 3.9 Energy consumption
Recommended publications
  • Blind Denoising Autoencoder
    1 Blind Denoising Autoencoder Angshul Majumdar In recent times a handful of papers have been published on Abstract—The term ‘blind denoising’ refers to the fact that the autoencoders used for signal denoising [10-13]. These basis used for denoising is learnt from the noisy sample itself techniques learn the autoencoder model on a training set and during denoising. Dictionary learning and transform learning uses the trained model to denoise new test samples. Unlike the based formulations for blind denoising are well known. But there has been no autoencoder based solution for the said blind dictionary learning and transform learning based approaches, denoising approach. So far autoencoder based denoising the autoencoder based methods were not blind; they were not formulations have learnt the model on a separate training data learning the model from the signal at hand. and have used the learnt model to denoise test samples. Such a The main disadvantage of such an approach is that, one methodology fails when the test image (to denoise) is not of the never knows how good the learned autoencoder will same kind as the models learnt with. This will be first work, generalize on unseen data. In the aforesaid studies [10-13] where we learn the autoencoder from the noisy sample while denoising. Experimental results show that our proposed method training was performed on standard dataset of natural images performs better than dictionary learning (K-SVD), transform (image-net / CIFAR) and used to denoise natural images. Can learning, sparse stacked denoising autoencoder and the gold the learnt model be used to recover images from other standard BM3D algorithm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Delayed Self-Heterodyne Interference Measurement of Laser Linewidth Using Mach-Zehnder and Michelson Interferometers
    Sensors 2011, 11, 9233-9241; doi:10.3390/s111009233 OPEN ACCESS sensors ISSN 1424-8220 www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors Article A Comparison of Delayed Self-Heterodyne Interference Measurement of Laser Linewidth Using Mach-Zehnder and Michelson Interferometers Albert Canagasabey 1,2,*, Andrew Michie 1,2, John Canning 1, John Holdsworth 3, Simon Fleming 2, Hsiao-Chuan Wang 1,2 and Mattias L. Åslund 1 1 Interdisciplinary Photonics Laboratories (iPL), School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (J.C.); [email protected] (H.-C.W.); [email protected] (M.L.Å.) 2 Institute of Photonics and Optical Science (IPOS), School of Physics, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] (S.F.) 3 SMAPS, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] (J.H.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-9351-1984. Received: 17 August 2011; in revised form: 13 September 2011 / Accepted: 23 September 2011 / Published: 27 September 2011 Abstract: Linewidth measurements of a distributed feedback (DFB) fibre laser are made using delayed self heterodyne interferometry (DHSI) with both Mach-Zehnder and Michelson interferometer configurations. Voigt fitting is used to extract and compare the Lorentzian and Gaussian linewidths and associated sources of noise. The respective measurements are wL (MZI) = (1.6 ± 0.2) kHz and wL (MI) = (1.4 ± 0.1) kHz. The Michelson with Faraday rotator mirrors gives a slightly narrower linewidth with significantly reduced error.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernoulli-Gaussian Distribution with Memory As a Model for Power Line Communication Noise Victor Fernandes, Weiler A
    XXXV SIMPOSIO´ BRASILEIRO DE TELECOMUNICAC¸ OES˜ E PROCESSAMENTO DE SINAIS - SBrT2017, 3-6 DE SETEMBRO DE 2017, SAO˜ PEDRO, SP Bernoulli-Gaussian Distribution with Memory as a Model for Power Line Communication Noise Victor Fernandes, Weiler A. Finamore, Mois´es V. Ribeiro, Ninoslav Marina, and Jovan Karamachoski Abstract— The adoption of Additive Bernoulli-Gaussian Noise very useful to come up with a as simple as possible models (ABGN) as an additive noise model for Power Line Commu- of PLC noise, similar to the additive white Gaussian noise nication (PLC) systems is the subject of this paper. ABGN is a (AWGN) model. model that for a fraction of time is a low power noise and for the remaining time is a high power (impulsive) noise. In this context, In this regard, we introduce the definition of a simple and we investigate the usefulness of the ABGN as a model for the useful mathematical model for the noise perturbing the data additive noise in PLC systems, using samples of noise registered transmission over PLC channel that would be a helpful tool. during a measurement campaign. A general procedure to find the With this goal in mind, an investigation of the usefulness of model parameters, namely, the noise power and the impulsiveness what we call additive Bernoulli-Gaussian noise (ABGN) as a factor is presented. A strategy to assess the noise memory, using LDPC codes, is also examined and we came to the conclusion that model for the noise perturbing the digital communication over ABGN with memory is a consistent model that can be used as for PLC channel is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • EP Signal to Noise in Emp 2
    TN0000909 – Former Doc. No. TECN1852625 – New Doc. No. Rev. 02 Page 1 of 5 Understanding the EP Signal-to-Noise Calculation in Empower 2 This document: • Provides a definition of the 2005 European Pharmacopeia (EP) signal-to-noise ratio • Describes the built-in EP S/N calculation in Empower™ 2 • Describes the custom field necessary to determine EP S/N using noise from a blank injection. 2005 European Pharmacopeia (EP) Definition: Signal-to-Noise Ratio The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) influences the precision of quantification and is calculated by the equation: 2H S/N = λ where: H = Height of the peak (Figure 1) corresponding to the component concerned, in the chromatogram obtained with the prescribed reference solution, measured from the maximum of the peak to the extrapolated baseline of the signal observed over a distance equal to 20 times the width at half-height. λ = Range of the background noise in a chromatogram obtained after injection or application of a blank, observed over a distance equal to 20 times the width at half- height of the peak in the chromatogram obtained with the prescribed reference solution and, if possible, situated equally around the place where this peak would be found. Figure 1 – Peak Height Measurement TN0000909 – Former Doc. No. TECN1852625 – New Doc. No. Rev. 02 Page 2 of 5 In Empower 2 software, the EP Signal-to-Noise (EP S/N) is determined in an automated fashion and does not require a blank injection. The intention of this calculation is to preserve the sense of the EP calculation without requiring a separate blank injection.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement and Estimation of the Mode Partition Coefficient K
    Measurement and Estimation of the Mode Partition Coefficient k Rick Pimpinella and Jose Castro IEEE P802.3bm 40 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s Fiber Optic Task Force November 2012, San Antonio, TX Background & Objective Background: Mode Partition Noise in MMF channel links is caused by pulse-to-pulse power fluctuations among VCSEL modes and differential delay due to dispersion in the fiber (Power independent penalty) “k” is an index used to describe the degree of mode fluctuations and takes on a value between 0 and 1, called the mode partition coefficient [1,2] Currently the IEEE link model assumes k = 0.3 It has been discussed that a new link model requires validation of k The measurement & estimation of k is challenging due to several conditions: Low sensitivity of detectors at 850nm The presence of additional noise components in VCSEL-MMF channels (RIN, MN, Jitter – intensity fluctuations, reflection noise, thermal noise, …) Differences in VCSEL designs Objective: Provide an experimental estimate of the value of k for VCSELs Additional work in progress 2 MPN Theory Originally derived for Fabry-Perot lasers and SMF [3] Assumptions: Total power of all modes carried by each pulse is constant Power fluctuations among modes are anti-correlated Mechanism: When modes (different wavelengths) travel at the same speed their fluctuations remain anti-correlated and the resultant pulse-to-pulse noise is zero. When modes travel in a dispersive medium the modes undergo different delays resulting in pulse distortions and a noise penalty. Example: Two VCSEL modes transmitted in a SMF undergoing chromatic dispersion: START END Optical Waveform @ Detector START t END With mode power fluctuations Decision Region Shorter Wavelength Time (arrival) t slope DL Time (arrival) Longer Wavelength Time (arrival) 3 Example of Intensity Fluctuation among VCSEL modes MPN can be observed using an Optical Spectrum Analyzer (OSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Noise Measurements on Business Machines (Bo0125)
    BO 0125-11 Introduction to Noise Measurements on Business Machines by Roger Upton, B.Sc. Introduction In recent years, manufacturers of DIN 45 635 pt.19 ization committees in the pursuit of business machines, that is computing ANSI Si.29, (soon to be superced- harmonization, meaning that the stan- and office machines, have come under ed by ANSI S12.10) dards agree with each other in the increasing pressure to provide noise ECMA 74 bulk of their requirements. This appli- data on their products. For instance, it ISO/DIS 7779 cation note first discusses some acous- is becoming increasingly common to tic measurement parameters, and then see noise levels advertised, particular- With four separate standards in ex- the measurements required by the ly for printers. A number of standards istence, one might expect some con- various standards. Finally, it describes have been written governing how such siderable divergence in their require- some Briiel & Kjaer measurement sys- noise measurements should be made, ments. However, there has been close terns capable of making the required namely: contact between the various standard- measurements. Introduction to Noise Measurement Parameters The standards referred to in the previous section call for measure• ments of sound power and sound pres• sure. These measurements can then be used in a variety of ways, such as noise labelling, prediction of installation noise levels, comparison of noise emis• sions of products, and production con• trol. Sound power and sound pressure are fundamentally different quanti• ties. Sound power is a measure of the ability of a device to make noise. It is independent of the acoustic environ• ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Noise, Noise Sensitivity, and Attitudes Towards Neighbours, and a Subjective Experiment Using a Rubber Ball Impact Sound
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Background Noise, Noise Sensitivity, and Attitudes towards Neighbours, and a Subjective Experiment Using a Rubber Ball Impact Sound Jeongho Jeong Fire Insurers Laboratories of Korea, 1030 Gyeongchungdae-ro, Yeoju-si 12661, Korea; [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-887-6737 Abstract: When children run and jump or adults walk indoors, the impact sounds conveyed to neighbouring households have relatively high energy in low-frequency bands. The experience of and response to low-frequency floor impact sounds can differ depending on factors such as the duration of exposure, the listener’s noise sensitivity, and the level of background noise in housing complexes. In order to study responses to actual floor impact sounds, it is necessary to investigate how the response is affected by changes in the background noise and differences in the response when focusing on other tasks. In this study, the author presented subjects with a rubber ball impact sound recorded from different apartment buildings and housings and investigated the subjects’ responses to varying levels of background noise and when they were assigned tasks to change their level of attention on the presented sound. The subjects’ noise sensitivity and response to their neighbours were also compared. The results of the subjective experiment showed differences in the subjective responses depending on the level of background noise, and high intensity rubber ball impact sounds were associated with larger subjective responses. In addition, when subjects were performing a Citation: Jeong, J. Background Noise, task like browsing the internet, they attended less to the rubber ball impact sound, showing a less Noise Sensitivity, and Attitudes towards Neighbours, and a Subjective sensitive response to the same intensity of impact sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation from Quantized Gaussian Measurements: When and How to Use Dither Joshua Rapp, Robin M
    1 Estimation from Quantized Gaussian Measurements: When and How to Use Dither Joshua Rapp, Robin M. A. Dawson, and Vivek K Goyal Abstract—Subtractive dither is a powerful method for remov- be arbitrarily far from minimizing the mean-squared error ing the signal dependence of quantization noise for coarsely- (MSE). For example, when the population variance vanishes, quantized signals. However, estimation from dithered measure- the sample mean estimator has MSE inversely proportional ments often naively applies the sample mean or midrange, even to the number of samples, whereas the MSE achieved by the when the total noise is not well described with a Gaussian or midrange estimator is inversely proportional to the square of uniform distribution. We show that the generalized Gaussian dis- the number of samples [2]. tribution approximately describes subtractively-dithered, quan- tized samples of a Gaussian signal. Furthermore, a generalized In this paper, we develop estimators for cases where the Gaussian fit leads to simple estimators based on order statistics quantization is neither extremely fine nor extremely coarse. that match the performance of more complicated maximum like- The motivation for this work stemmed from a series of lihood estimators requiring iterative solvers. The order statistics- experiments performed by the authors and colleagues with based estimators outperform both the sample mean and midrange single-photon lidar. In [3], temporally spreading a narrow for nontrivial sums of Gaussian and uniform noise. Additional laser pulse, equivalent to adding non-subtractive Gaussian analysis of the generalized Gaussian approximation yields rules dither, was found to reduce the effects of the detector’s coarse of thumb for determining when and how to apply dither to temporal resolution on ranging accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Image Denoising by Autoencoder: Learning Core Representations
    Image Denoising by AutoEncoder: Learning Core Representations Zhenyu Zhao College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University, Australia, [email protected] Abstract. In this paper, we implement an image denoising method which can be generally used in all kinds of noisy images. We achieve denoising process by adding Gaussian noise to raw images and then feed them into AutoEncoder to learn its core representations(raw images itself or high-level representations).We use pre- trained classifier to test the quality of the representations with the classification accuracy. Our result shows that in task-specific classification neuron networks, the performance of the network with noisy input images is far below the preprocessing images that using denoising AutoEncoder. In the meanwhile, our experiments also show that the preprocessed images can achieve compatible result with the noiseless input images. Keywords: Image Denoising, Image Representations, Neuron Networks, Deep Learning, AutoEncoder. 1 Introduction 1.1 Image Denoising Image is the object that stores and reflects visual perception. Images are also important information carriers today. Acquisition channel and artificial editing are the two main ways that corrupt observed images. The goal of image restoration techniques [1] is to restore the original image from a noisy observation of it. Image denoising is common image restoration problems that are useful by to many industrial and scientific applications. Image denoising prob- lems arise when an image is corrupted by additive white Gaussian noise which is common result of many acquisition channels. The white Gaussian noise can be harmful to many image applications. Hence, it is of great importance to remove Gaussian noise from images.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Background Noise on Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Hearing Screenings Amy E
    Louisiana Tech University Louisiana Tech Digital Commons Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School Spring 2012 The effects of background noise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing screenings Amy E. Hollowell Louisiana Tech University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.latech.edu/dissertations Part of the Speech Pathology and Audiology Commons Recommended Citation Hollowell, Amy E., "" (2012). Dissertation. 348. https://digitalcommons.latech.edu/dissertations/348 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Louisiana Tech Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Louisiana Tech Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF BACKGROUND NOISE ON DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS AND HEARING SCREENINGS by Amy E. Hollowell, B.S. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Audiology COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY May 2012 UMI Number: 3515927 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. DiygrMution UMI 3515927 Published by ProQuest LLC 2012. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY THE GRADUATE SCHOOL 2/27/2012 Date We hereby recommend that the dissertation prepared under our supervision by Amy E.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Aircraft Noise Exposure on Heart Rate During Sleep in the Population Living Near Airports
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Effects of Aircraft Noise Exposure on Heart Rate during Sleep in the Population Living Near Airports Ali-Mohamed Nassur 1,*, Damien Léger 2, Marie Lefèvre 1, Maxime Elbaz 2, Fanny Mietlicki 3, Philippe Nguyen 3, Carlos Ribeiro 3, Matthieu Sineau 3, Bernard Laumon 4 and Anne-Sophie Evrard 1 1 Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE, UMR T_9405, F-69675 Bron, France; [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (A.-S.E.) 2 Université Paris Descartes, APHP, Hôtel-Dieu de Paris, Centre du Sommeil et de la Vigilance et EA 7330 VIFASOM, 75004 Paris, France; [email protected] (D.L.); [email protected] (M.E.) 3 Bruitparif, the Center for Technical Assessment of the Noise Environment in the Île-de-France Region of France, 93200 Saint-Denis, France; [email protected] (F.M.); [email protected] (P.N.); [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (M.S.) 4 IFSTTAR, Transport, Health and Safety Department, F-69675 Bron, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2018; Accepted: 15 January 2019; Published: 18 January 2019 Abstract: Background Noise in the vicinity of airports is a public health problem. Many laboratory studies have shown that heart rate is altered during sleep after exposure to road or railway noise. Fewer studies have looked at the effects of exposure to aircraft noise on heart rate during sleep in populations living near airports. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the sound pressure level (SPL) of aircraft noise and heart rate during sleep in populations living near airports in France.
    [Show full text]
  • ECE 417 Lecture 3: 1-D Gaussians Mark Hasegawa-Johnson 9/5/2017 Contents
    ECE 417 Lecture 3: 1-D Gaussians Mark Hasegawa-Johnson 9/5/2017 Contents • Probability and Probability Density • Gaussian pdf • Central Limit Theorem • Brownian Motion • White Noise • Vector with independent Gaussian elements Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) A “cumulative distribution function” (CDF) specifies the probability that random variable X takes a value less than : Probability Density Function (pdf) A “probability density function” (pdf) is the derivative of the CDF: That means, for example, that the probability of getting an X in any interval is: Example: Uniform pdf The rand() function in most programming languages simulates a number uniformly distributed between 0 and 1, that is, Suppose you generated 100 random numbers using the rand() function. • How many of the numbers would be between 0.5 and 0.6? • How many would you expect to be between 0.5 and 0.6? • How many would you expect to be between 0.95 and 1.05? Gaussian (Normal) pdf Gauss considered this problem: under what circumstances does it make sense to estimate the mean of a distribution, , by taking the average of the experimental values, ? He demonstrated that is the maximum likelihood estimate of if Gaussian pdf Attribution: jhguch, https://commons. wikimedia.org/wik i/File:Boxplot_vs_P DF.svg Unit Normal pdf Suppose that X is normal with mean and standard deviation (variance ): Then is normal with mean 0 and standard deviation 1: Central Limit Theorem The Gaussian pdf is important because of the Central Limit Theorem. Suppose are i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed), each having mean and variance . Then Example: the sum of uniform random variables Suppose that are i.i.d.
    [Show full text]